Lapa Public Lectures and Workshops

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lapa Public Lectures and Workshops LAPA PUBLIC LECTURES AND WORKSHOPS In addition to LAPA’s regular seminar series and conference events, LAPA also sponsors or cosponsors public lectures, informal workshops and other events that are not part of a regular series. Those events are listed here, from the most recent back to LAPA’s beginnings. Robert C. Post, David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School Third Annual Donald S. Bernstein ’75 Lecture May 3, 2007, 4:30 pm Robert C. Post joined the Yale faculty as the first David Boies Professor of Law. He focuses his teaching and writing on constitutional law, and is a specialist in the area of First Amendment theory and constitutional jurisprudence. Before coming to Yale Law, he had been teaching since 1983 at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall). Post is the author of Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management and co-author with K. Anthony Appiah, Judith Butler, Thomas C. Grey and Reva Siegel of Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Antidiscrimination Law. He edited or co- edited Civil Society and Government, Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, Race and Representation: Affirmative Action, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation and Law and Order of Culture. His scholarship has appeared academic journals in the humanities as well as in dozens of important law review articles, many in recent years with his colleague Reva Siegel. In 2003, he wrote the important Harvard Law Review “foreword” to its annual review of Supreme Court jurisprudence. Post was a law clerk to Chief Judge David L. Bazelon of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and for Justice William J. Brennan Jr. of the United States Supreme Court. Prior to joining the Boalt Hall faculty, Post was an associate in the firm Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C., serving in its litigation section. He served as general counsel to the American Association of University Professors 1992-1994 and to Governor Wilson's Independent Panel on Redistricting in 1991. Post has been honored with the Koret Israel Prize and with fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies. He received the 1998 Hughes-Gossett Award for best article in the Journal of Supreme Court History. He is councilor and librarian of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, of which he is a LAPA Public Lectures and Workshops 2 LAPA Review Spring 2007 fellow, and is a member of the American Law Institute. He is a trustee of the National Humanities Center, on the executive committee of the American Council of Learned Societies, and on the editorial board of Representations. Post earned his B.A. summa cum laude from Harvard University, a J.D. from Yale Law School where he served as note editor of the Yale Law Journal, and a Ph.D. in the History of American Civilization from Harvard. Scott Long, Human Rights Watch “The International Silence of the LGBT Community” Public Lecture co-sponsored by LAPA/PIIRS/LGBT April 18, 2007 Scott Long, director of the LGBT rights program for Human Rights Watch, will speak about ongoing efforts to break the silence for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons around the world. Long has been a long-time human rights activist. Beginning in the early 1990s, while living in the former Soviet bloc, he gathered detailed information on Romania's mistreatment of gays and lesbians, and led over forty missions to Romanian penitentiaries, reporting extensively on conditions there. He has worked closely with many LGBT groups in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, as well as with human rights groups including the Romanian Helsinki Committee. In 1993, he conducted the first fact-finding mission on the situation of gays and lesbians in Albania. He is the author, among other articles and reports, of Public Scandals: Sexual Orientation and Criminal Law in Romania, co-published by the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission and Human Rights Watch, and has edited and contributed to recent reports on gay and lesbian parenting, and on the use of sexuality to target women's and feminist organizing worldwide. He holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University; he has taught as a visiting professor at the University of Budapest, and for two years was a Senior Fulbright Professor of American Literature at the University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Kenji Yoshino, Deputy Dean for Intellectual Life and Professor of Law, Yale Law School "The End of Civil Rights?: The Supreme Court's Rejection of Identity Politics" Moffett Lecture, Co-sponsored by UCHV and LAPA April 5, 2007 Kenji Yoshino is professor of law and deputy dean for intellectual life at Yale Law School. The author of Covering: The Hidden Assault on our Civil Rights, Yoshino was educated at Harvard, Oxford, and Yale Law School. He is a specialist in constitutional law, antidiscrimination law, and law and literature and he has published work in a wide variety of academic journals, including the Columbia Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Stanford Law Review, and Yale Law Journal. His writing has been featured in The Boston LAPA Public Lectures and Workshops 3 LAPA Review Spring 2007 Globe, The Nation, The New York Times, and The Village Voice, and he has appeared on The Charlie Rose Show, Fox News Channel’s The O’Reilly Factor, C-SPAN's Washington Journal, and the Tavis Smiley Show. He lives in New Haven, CT, and New York City. Oona Hathaway, Yale Law School “International Law and Domestic Authority” Seminar Co-sponsored by LAPA/Center for Global Governance April 2, 2007 Oona A. Hathaway is an Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School. She earned her B.A. at Harvard University and her J.D. at Yale Law School. Before joining the faculty at Yale, she served as a law clerk for Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and for D.C. Circuit Judge Patricia Wald, held fellowships at Harvard University's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy and Center for the Ethics and the Professions, and served as an Associate Professor at Boston University School of Law. Her current research focuses on how international law shapes countries' behavior. Her recent articles include Revisionism and Rationalism in International Law, Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law, The Cost of Compliance, and Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? A 2004 Carnegie Scholar, she is working on a book on the promise and limits of international law. Robert Gordon, Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and Legal History, Yale Law School “The Legal Profession, 1870-2000”, Seminar co-sponsored by LAPA/American Studies February 22, 2007 Robert Gordon is the Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and Legal History at Yale Law School. His subject areas are contracts, American legal history, evidence, the legal profession, and law and globalization. Prior to coming to Yale, he taught at The University of Wisconsin and Stanford. Professor Gordon has an A.B. and J.D. from Harvard. Peter W. Galbraith, Senior Diplomatic Fellow, Center for Arms Control and Nuclear Nonproliferation; former US Ambassador to Croatia. "The End Of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created A War Without End", Public Lecture Co-sponsored by LAPA/WWS October 10, 2006 LAPA Public Lectures and Workshops 4 LAPA Review Spring 2007 Peter W. Galbraith served as the first US Ambassador to Croatia and has held senior positions in the US Government and the United Nations. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book, The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End (2006). Currently, he is the Senior Diplomatic Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation and a principal at the Windham Resources Group LLC. Walter F. Murphy, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Princeton University “The Constitution, Dead or Alive?” Constitution Day Event Public Lecture Co-sponsored by the Madison Program/LAPA September 19, 2006 Walter F. Murphy, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Princeton University, is among the most distinguished constitutional scholars of the 20th century. A decade after joining the Princeton faculty, he was named the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, succeeding Woodrow Wilson, Edward S. Corwin and Alpheus T. Mason in one of the nation’s most prestigious endowed chairs. Professor Murphy is the recipient of numerous honors, including the Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Political Science Association, Law and Courts Section, and the Chicago Foundation for Literature Award in 1980 for his novel, The Vicar of Christ. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a senior fellow of the Italian Academy for Advanced Study in America. He is the author of Wiretapping on Trial, Elements of Judicial Strategy, and Congress and the Court, as well as works of fiction exploring important political and religious themes, including Upon This Rock: The Life of St. Peter and The Roman Enigma. Professor Murphy earned a Purple Heart, Distinguished Service Cross, three Battle Stars, and a Presidential Unit Citation for his service in the U.S. Marine Corps during the Korean War. He earned a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. President Carl Baudenbacher, Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), “Judicial Dialogue among the European Supreme Courts: The European Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights and the European Free Trade Association Court" Public Lecture, September 18, 2006 Professor Carl Baudenbacher presides over the EFTA court, which hears disputes between European Union member states and the near-EU members (Iceland, Norway, Lichtenstein). He is also a Professor at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. The LAPA Public Lectures and Workshops 5 LAPA Review Spring 2007 author of more than 40 monographs and edited collections, Professor Baudenbacher has written on a wide range of subjects - from European competition (antitrust) and intellectual property law to comparative constitutional law.
Recommended publications
  • ABUSING the LEGACY of the HOLOCAUST: the ROLE of Ngos in EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS to DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M
    ABUSING THE LEGACY OF THE HOLOCAUST: THE ROLE OF NGOs IN EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS TO DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M. Steinberg In the wake of the Holocaust, as human rights norms have come to the fore, NGOs have become major actors in international politics in general and in the Arab-Israeli conflict in particular. These organizations and their leaders form an extremely powerful “NGO community” that has propelled the anti-Israeli agenda in international frameworks such as the UN Human Rights Commission and the 2001 UN Conference against Racism in Durban. Through their reports, press releases, and influence among academics and diplomats, these NGOs propagated false charges of “massacre” during the Israeli army’s antiterror operation in Jenin (Defensive Shield) and misrepresent Israel’s separation barrier as an “apartheid wall.” This community has exploited the “halo effect” of human rights rhetoric to promote highly particularistic goals. In most cases small groups of individuals, with substantial funds obtained from non- profit foundations and governments (particularly European), use the NGO frameworks to gain influence and pursue private political agendas, without being accountable to any system of checks and balances. Jewish Political Studies Review 16:3-4 (Fall 2004) 59 60 Gerald M. Steinberg This process has been most salient in the framework of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The ideology of anticolonialism (the precursor to today’s antiglobalization) and political correctness is dominant in the NGO community. This ideology accepted the post-1967 pro-Palestinian narrative and images of victimization, while labeling Israel as a neocolo- nialist aggressor. Thus, behind the human rights rhetoric, these NGOs are at the forefront of demonizing Israel and of the new anti-Semitism that seeks to deny the Jewish people sovereign equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • By Any Other Name: How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made
    By Any Other Name How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made Genocide Determinations By Todd F. Buchwald Adam Keith CONTENTS List of Acronyms ................................................................................. ix Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Section 1 - Overview of US Practice and Process in Determining Whether Genocide Has Occurred ....................................................... 3 When Have Such Decisions Been Made? .................................. 3 The Nature of the Process ........................................................... 3 Cold War and Historical Cases .................................................... 5 Bosnia, Rwanda, and the 1990s ................................................... 7 Darfur and Thereafter .................................................................... 8 Section 2 - What Does the Word “Genocide” Actually Mean? ....... 10 Public Perceptions of the Word “Genocide” ........................... 10 A Legal Definition of the Word “Genocide” ............................. 10 Complications Presented by the Definition ...............................11 How Clear Must the Evidence Be in Order to Conclude that Genocide has Occurred? ................................................... 14 Section 3 - The Power and Importance of the Word “Genocide” .. 15 Genocide’s Unique Status .......................................................... 15 A Different Perspective ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Treasury FOIA Log 2010 1 Requestor Requesting
    Department of the Treasury FOIA Log 2010 Requestor Requesting Organization Request Short Description Request Type Number (b) (6) 2010-01-001 request for records concerning IG Investigations closed since October 1, 2008 FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-002 request for records concerning personal matters. FOIA Stephen Meardon Bowdoin College 2010-01-003 request for records concerning a report produced within the Division of Monetary FOIA Research in 1938 John Lehrer Baker Hostetler 2010-01-004 request for records pertaining to Revenue Ruling 2006-27, 2006-1 C.B. 915. FOIA Geoffry Walsh National Consumer Law 2010-01-005 request for records concerning Making Home Affordable Program documents FOIA Center Stephen Meardon Bowdoin College 2010-01-006 request for records concerning a 1938 report regarding "The Criteria for Determining FOIA Injury to Domestic Injury (Anti-Dumping Act of 1921) (b) (6) 2010-01-007 request for records pertaining to personal matters FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-008 request for records concerning personal matters FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-009 request for records concerning personal matters FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-010 request for records concerning Secretary Geither's Presidential Commission and Oath FOIA of Office. (b) (6) 2010-01-011 request for records concerning personal matters FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-012 request for records concerning custody permitting or granting Wachovia Bank or any FOIA of its top holders to be agents for general government (b) (6) 2010-01-013 request for records concerning personal matters FOIA (b) (6) 2010-01-014 request
    [Show full text]
  • The September 11Th Victim Compensation Fund
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship Winter 2003 Grief, Procedure and Justice: The eptS ember 11th Victim Compensation Fund Elizabeth M. Schneider Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, and the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation 53 DePaul L. Rev. 457 (2003-2004) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. GRIEF, PROCEDURE, AND JUSTICE: THE SEPTEMBER 11TH VICTIM COMPENSATION FUND Elizabeth M. Schneider* INTRODUCTION The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 is unprece- dented in the American legal system. The Victim Compensation Fund emerged from congressional efforts to bail out the airlines from law- suits arising from the September 11th tragedy. The compromise was to give those who lost family members, or were injured, something in return for waiving the right to sue the airlines-to give them compen- sation for their loss. In this Article, I examine the Fund through the lens of the ex- traordinary grief and trauma-both collective and individual-that has shaped our post-September 11th psychic, social, and political land- scape. The grief and trauma that we have experienced as individuals and as a nation is unprecedented-a level of fear, anxiety, sadness, and a sense of horror as what was previously unimaginable has now become imaginable. Because the grief and trauma experienced as a result of September 11th has been so profound, so widely shared, and so public, it is especially important to consider these issues in assessing the Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • The BP Oil Spill Settlements, Classwide Punitive Damages, and Societal Deterrence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Via Sapientiae: The Institutional Repository at DePaul University DePaul Law Review Volume 64 Issue 2 Winter 2015: Twentieth Annual Clifford Symposium on Tort Law and Social Policy - In Article 19 Honor of Jack Weinstein The BP Oil Spill Settlements, Classwide Punitive Damages, and Societal Deterrence Catherine M. Sharkey Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Catherine M. Sharkey, The BP Oil Spill Settlements, Classwide Punitive Damages, and Societal Deterrence, 64 DePaul L. Rev. (2015) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol64/iss2/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BP OIL SPILL SETTLEMENTS, CLASSWIDE PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND SOCIETAL DETERRENCE Catherine M. Sharkey* INTRODUCTION In late 2012, BP p.l.c. (BP) funded the Court Supervised Settlement Program as part of a class action settlement of the consolidated mul- tidistrict litigation arising from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The BP settlement provided solely for compensatory damages to claimants. It left open the possibility that claimants eligi- ble for punitive damages could be certified as a class for litigation or settlement purposes against BP’s codefendants (but not BP) in the future. In 2014, Halliburton Company (Halliburton) (one of BP’s co- defendants) reached such a classwide punitive damages settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 912 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: OIL SPILL by the OIL RIG * MDL NO. 2179 “DEEPWATER HORIZON” IN THE * GULF OF MEXICO, on APRIL 20, 2010 * * THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: * JUDGE BARBIER * ALL CASES * MAG. JUDGE SHUSHAN * ******************************************* MOTION TO SUPERVISE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN BP DEFENDANTS AND PUTATIVE CLASS MEMBERS N OW INTO COURT come Plaintiffs, who respectfully pray for an order governing ex parte communication between the BP Defendants and putative class members, for the reasons that follow: I . Plaintiffs do not ask the Court to dictate, enjoin or otherwise interfere with the processing or payment of claims by BP thru the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (“GCCF”). II. Plaintiffs, rather, seek to ensure that the proposed Release and associated communications with putative classmembers are neither confusing nor misleading. Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 912 Filed 12/21/10 Page 2 of 8 III BP has been playing a “Shell Game” with the GCCF from the very beginning. When BP wants to rely on the GCCF’s presentment process, or take credit for what the GCCF is doing, then BP freely invokes and adopts the activities of the Claims Facility. When, on the other hand, BP wants to avoid responsibility for the GCCF, or to shield the GCCF from legal or professional responsibilities, then the Claims Facility becomes “independent” from BP. IV. The GCCF should either be a truly separate and independent trust or other juridical entity, with full access and transparency, and attendant fiduciary or other duties to a defined set of beneficiaries, based on a defined set of criteria; or, if, in the alternative, the GCCF is nothing more than an alter ego of the BP Defendants, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria and the UN Security Council Dr
    Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect Occasional Paper Series No. 5, March 2015 Failure to Protect: Syria and the UN Security Council Dr. Simon Adams The Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect was established in February 2008 as a catalyst to promote and apply the norm of the “Responsibility to Protect” populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Through its programs and publications, the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is a resource for governments, international institutions and civil society on prevention and early action to halt mass atrocity crimes. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Simon Adams is Executive Director of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. Dr. Adams has worked extensively with governments and civil society organizations in South Africa, East Timor, Rwanda and elsewhere. Between 1994 and 2002 Dr. Adams worked with Sinn Féin and former IRA prisoners in support of the Northern Ireland peace process. He is also a former anti-apartheid activist and member of the African National Congress. Dr. Adams has written on the Responsibility to Protect as well as the ongoing conflict in Syria for the New York Times, International Herald Tribune and many other publications. Dr. Adams has also appeared as an expert commentator on Al-Jazeera, BBC, ARD (Germany), Chinese Central Television and numerous other media. He has written four books and numerous articles on issues of political conflict and mass atrocity prevention. Dr. Adams previously served as Pro Vice Chancellor at Monash University in Australia and as Vice President of its South African campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Compensation for Economic Loss Following an Oil Spill Incident: Building a New Framework for Thailand
    Compensation for Economic Loss Following an Oil Spill Incident: Building a New Framework for Thailand Tidarat Sinlapariromsuk A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Donsheng Zang, Chair William Rodgers Sanne Knudsen Usha Varanasi Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Law © Copyright 2017 Tidarat Sinlapapiromsuk University of Washington Abstract Compensation for Economic Loss Following an Oil Spill Incident: Building a New Framework for Thailand Tidarat Sinlapapiromsuk Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor of Law Dongsheng Zang School of Law The Rayong Oil Spill of 2013 presents a useful example of the catastrophic consequences of a large oil spill in Thailand, consequences that can provide meaningful lessons for industry and government. Many local residents and businesses throughout the coastal communities in Rayong suffered economic loss largely due to damages to natural resources; however, under the existing legal regime, there is no effective comprehensive legal framework that directly and adequately regulates the compensation regimes that handle claims of economic-loss following an oil-spill incident. Equally, as an alternative to litigation, there is no adequate guidance for the regimes handling rapid compensation payments for such type of claims. In the aftermath of the Rayong Spill, the responsible bodies developed the out-of-court compensation program on the fly, struggling to find a proper way to respond to this unprecedented disaster—yet this response was so haphazard that it left some claimants without clear rights to compensation, or, conceivably, it even left them with unfair levels of compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldstone Report on Gaza and Its Consequences in Israel
    CIDOB • Barcelona Centre for International for Affairs Centre CIDOB • Barcelona notesISSN: 2013-4428 internacionals CIDOB A MISSED OPPORTUNITY: 13 the Goldstone Report on Gaza MARCH 2010 and its consequences in Israel Alvise Vianello Researcher at CIDOB hen Israel started its offensive against the Hamas- Operation Cast Lead started on 27 December 2008, when ruled Gaza Strip in December 2008 it had four Israel began a wave of air-strikes on the Gaza Strip. The manifest objectives: First, to stop rockets being strikes followed Hamas’ decision to end a six-month cease- Wfired into the Northern Negev; second, to weaken the mili- fire. With the ceasefire over, Hamas intensified its rocket tary and security infrastructure of Hamas in Gaza; third, to and mortar attacks against Israel, targeting for the first time restore the deterrence it had lost after the years of rocket at- major Israeli cities such as Beersheba and Ashdod, and vir- tacks against its territory, fourth, to secure release of caporal tually threatening the whole population of the Northern Gilad Shalit, kidnapped by Hamas in 2006. According to most Negev of 700.000. The ground invasion of Gaza begun on international analysts, the war successfully achieved the first January 3rd. Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire on Janu- three goals. Nevertheless the international debate that fol- ary 18, completing its withdrawal on January 21. Between lowed the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UN- 1,166 (source: Israel Defence Forces) and 1,417 (source: Pal- HRC) fact-finding mission on the violation of Human Rights estinian Ministry of Health in Gaza) Palestinians and 13 during the conflict, had three additional unintended results: Israelis were killed, thousands more were injured and lost (1) it widened the differences between Israel and Internation- their homes, Gaza’s infrastructure was annihilated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of “The Interests of Justice
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH 350 Fifth Ave, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118 Phone: 212.290.4700 Fax: 212.736.1300 [email protected] Kenneth Roth, Executive Director Allison Adoradio, Operations Director Michele Alexander, Development & Outreach Director Carroll Bogert, Associate Director Widney Brown, Deputy Program Director Peggy Hicks, Global Advocacy Director Iain Levine, Program Director Dinah PoKempner, General Counsel James Ross, Senior Legal Advisor Joe Saunders, Deputy Program Director Wilder Tayler, Legal and Policy Director PROGRAM DIRECTORS Brad Adams, Asia Holly Cartner, Europe & Central Asia Peter Takirambudde, Africa José Miguel Vivanco, Americas HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East & North Africa POLICY PAPER: Jamie Fellner, United States Bruni Burres, International Film Festival THE MEANING OF “THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE” Joanne Csete, HIV/AIDS Richard Dicker, International Justice IN ARTICLE 53 OF THE ROME STATUTE Arvind Ganesan, Business & Human Rights Diane Goodman, Refugees JUNE 2005 Steve Goose, Arms LaShawn R. Jefferson, Women’s Rights Scott Long, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Rights Lois Whitman, Children’s Rights ADVOCACY DIRECTORS Introduction Steve Crawshaw, London Loubna Freih, Geneva Lotte Leicht, Brussels Under Article 53 of the Rome Statute, the prosecutor has important Tom Malinowski, Washington DC responsibility to decide “whether to initiate an investigation,” and, upon Wendy Patten, United States Joanna Weschler, United Nations investigation, to decide “that there is not a sufficient basis for a BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jane Olson, Chair prosecution.” In making these decisions, the Rome Statute states that a James F. Hoge, Jr., Vice-Chair factor to be considered by the prosecutor is “the interests of justice.” The Sid Sheinberg, Vice-Chair John J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda Richard Johnson March 19, 2013
    The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda Richard Johnson March 19, 2013 Copyright © Richard Johnson 2013 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. ‘Let the Genocidal Parties Back In’ 3 1. The RDR in 2010 2. The FDLR since 1994 8 3. The MDR in 2003 11 III. ‘Do Not Ban their Ideology’ 13 IV. ‘Don’t Hold More Than a Few Perpetrators Accountable, Forget Their Foreign Accomplices’ 16 1. Minimizing the relevance and scale of the genocide 2. Reducing the importance of post-genocide accountability 18 3. Don’t hold more than a few perpetrators accountable: condemning gacaca 20 4. Fighting transfers and extradition to Rwanda 23 5. Ignoring the impunity of fugitive genocide suspects 24 6. Forget about foreign accomplices: France, the Catholic Church 25 V. ‘Admit You Are No Better Than They’ 27 1. Accusations in a mirror and moral equivalency 2. Small brush strokes to damn the RPF 28 3. Embracing the Gersony Report, pressing the ICTR to try RPF leaders 29 4. Endorsing the Bruguière and Merelles indictments 30 5. Touting the UN Mapping Report 31 6. Holding Kagame responsible for any renewed genocide against the Rwandan Tutsi 33 VI. Conclusion 33 VII. Footnotes 36 I. Introduction What Human Rights Watch (HRW) does on Rwanda is not human rights advocacy. It is political advocacy which has become profoundly unscrupulous in both its means and its ends. HRW’s Board of Directors should hold Executive Director Kenneth Roth and the HRW personnel who cover Rwandan issues accountable for this travesty, which has dangerous implications for Western policy toward Rwanda and for the overall credibility of Western human rights advocacy.
    [Show full text]