Syria and the UN Security Council Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Syria and the UN Security Council Dr Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect Occasional Paper Series No. 5, March 2015 Failure to Protect: Syria and the UN Security Council Dr. Simon Adams The Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect was established in February 2008 as a catalyst to promote and apply the norm of the “Responsibility to Protect” populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Through its programs and publications, the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is a resource for governments, international institutions and civil society on prevention and early action to halt mass atrocity crimes. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Simon Adams is Executive Director of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. Dr. Adams has worked extensively with governments and civil society organizations in South Africa, East Timor, Rwanda and elsewhere. Between 1994 and 2002 Dr. Adams worked with Sinn Féin and former IRA prisoners in support of the Northern Ireland peace process. He is also a former anti-apartheid activist and member of the African National Congress. Dr. Adams has written on the Responsibility to Protect as well as the ongoing conflict in Syria for the New York Times, International Herald Tribune and many other publications. Dr. Adams has also appeared as an expert commentator on Al-Jazeera, BBC, ARD (Germany), Chinese Central Television and numerous other media. He has written four books and numerous articles on issues of political conflict and mass atrocity prevention. Dr. Adams previously served as Pro Vice Chancellor at Monash University in Australia and as Vice President of its South African campus. COVER PHOTO: People watch the clashes between Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and Kurdish armed groups in the Syrian border town of Kobani (Ayn al-Arab) from Suruc district of Sanliurfa, Turkey on 9 October 2014. (Photo by Ibrahim Erikan/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) © Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, 2015. All Rights Reserved CONTENTS 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 Phases of the Conflict 8 Mass Atrocity Crimes 10 R2P and the UN Security Council 12 The Failure of the Annan Plan, March-July 2012 13 The West and Military Intervention 14 Russian Obduracy 16 Chemical Weapons and Iranian Interests 17 Three Unresolved Priorities 20 The Responsibility Not to Veto 21 Conclusion FAILURE TO PROTECT: SYRIA AND THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY After four deadly years the Syrian conflict shows no sign of the Syrian government to stop killing its own people, of abating. As the civil war has dragged on its violence has responsibility rests with the one body entrusted and become more widespread, systematic and extreme. The mandated by the 193 members of the United Nations with conflict has also become more intractable, threatening the the maintenance of international peace and security – the peace and stability of the entire Middle East. It has already Security Council. had devastating consequences for neighboring Iraq and poses an enduring threat to Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey. Despite resolutions that led to the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile and improved access to the 12.2 The Responsibility to Protect (R2P), the global commitment million suffering Syrian civilians who remain in desperate adopted at the 2005 United Nations (UN) World Summit, has need of humanitarian assistance, political divisions and been central to the international discourse on how to respond partisan interests within the Security Council have been an to mass atrocity crimes in Syria. Despite the acrimonious insurmountable obstacle. In particular, Russia and China debate surrounding the UN Security Council-mandated have on four separate occasions employed their vetoes to intervention in Libya in 2011, individual states, regional block action in response to mass atrocity crimes in Syria, organizations and UN agencies have struggled to find ways including most recently on a May 2014 draft resolution that and means of upholding their responsibility to protect the would have referred the Syrian situation to the International people of Syria. Public censure of atrocities committed by Criminal Court. As this paper shows, each veto strengthened both government forces and armed opposition groups, as well impunity and encouraged the expansion of war crimes and as bilateral sanctions, investigations by the UN Human Rights crimes against humanity. Council and a Joint Monitoring Mission deployed during the failed 2012 ceasefire, stand as examples of international efforts This occasional paper from the Global Centre for the to confront atrocities in Syria. But it has not been enough. Responsibility to Protect analyzes the Security Council’s response to Syria through the conflict’s various phases and The Responsibility to Protect is an international norm, but argues that without an agreement by the Permanent Members it does not possess independent agency. The failure to end of the Council to refrain from using their veto in future mass atrocities and protect civilians in Syria is not a failure of atrocity situations, the legitimacy and efficacy of the Council R2P, but of the imperfect actors and institutions charged will be increasingly called into question. This is a failure with its implementation. Beyond the primary responsibility that the Security Council, Syria and the world can ill afford. OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES | 3 Silopi 38°E 39°E 40°E Mardin 41°E 42°E Viransehir¸ Sanliurfa Kiziltepe Nusaybin Al Malika SYRIANAdana ARAB REPUBLICGaziantep 37°N TURKEY Al Qāmīshli Ceylanpinar Tarsus Maydān Ikbiz Barak Tall Abu Yumurtalik Ra's al 'Ayn Zahir¸ Icel Gulf of Jarāblus Akçakale Iskenderun Kilis Eu N Tall Tamr p ah h r A r Tall al Abyad l K Iskenderun Manbij a hā Al ¸Hasakah t bū Karatas Afrin e r Tall ‘Afar A'zaz s Kirikhan Sinjar Uluçinar Al Bāb Reyhanli AL HASAKAH¸ Halab¸ (Aleppo) r Antakya AR h RAQQAH a N Harim As Safira Buhayrat 36°N 36°N Idlib Sabkhat Al al Asad Ar Raqqah Jisr-Ash- Jabbul Shugur AL Arīhā ALEPPO CYPRUS Madīnat ath SYRIAN LĀDHIQĪYA IDLIB Thawrah ARAB REP. At Tibni Al Lādhiqīya DAYR AZ ZAWR (Latakia) Dayr az Zawr HAMĀH¸ Rawdah Bānyās As Sa'an Hamāh (Hamath) MEDITERRANEAN TARTUS¸ 35°N ¸ Masyaf E 35°N u Al Mayādīn p h SEA Tartus¸ ¸ ra IRAQ Ar Rastan As Sukhnah te Safita s Himş¸ (Homs) HIM޸ Buhayrat Tiyas Tarabulus- (Tripoli) Qattinah Tadmor Al Quşayr (Palmyra) Abū Kamāl Al Qa'im Jubayl LEBANON Al Qaryatayn National capital 34°N 34°N Baalbek An Nabk Provincial capital Zahle Bayrūt (Beirut) Yabrud Town, village Sab' Ābār Az Zabadānī Al Airport Qutayfah Saida At Tall International boundary Nabatiye et Tahta Dimashq (Damascus) Provincial boundary Darayya At¸ Tanf¸ Qatana Expressway Sūr (Tyre) DIMASHQ ¸ Main road Al Qunaytirah AL As Sanamayn Ar Rutbah Secondary road 33°N 33°N QUNAYTIRAH DAR'Ā Railroad Lake Shahba Haifa Izra' Trebil Oil pipeline Tiberias As Suwaydā' Nazareth Dar'ā AS JORDAN Irbid The boundaries and names shown and the designations 0 20 40 60 80 100 km ISRAEL SUWAYDĀ' used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 0 20 40 60 mi Netanya Salkhad 35°E 36°E Al Mafraq 37°E 38°E 39°E 40°E 41°E 42°E Map No. 4204 Rev. 3 UNITED NATIONS Department of Field Support April 2012 Cartographic Section 4 | GLOBAL CENTRE FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT FAILURE TO PROTECT: SYRIA AND THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL INTRODUCTION our years have passed and more than 220,000 people help protect civilians and halt atrocities.4 Although the Fhave been killed since the Syrian conflict first began, resolution had been supported by 13 of the 15 members but the civil war continues to inspire perpetrators on of the Council, diplomats and human rights advocates in all sides to commit new and appalling atrocities.1 Crude New York were despondent. improvised “barrel bombs” packed with chemical weapons have been dropped from government helicopters while public What became clear in the aftermath of the February 2012 beheadings and the attempted extermination of religious veto was that Security Council inaction emboldened those minorities by the extremist group the Islamic State of Iraq and inside Syria most committed to a military resolution the Levant (ISIL) have shocked the world.2 Caught between of the conflict. The killing rate in Syria increased from the crimes of the government and those of some armed rebel approximately 1,000 per month to approximately 5,000 per groups, villages and towns that have existed for centuries as month during 2012 as the civil war metastasised. Between part of the unique Levantine amalgam of cultures and faiths February and November of 2012 the death toll soared from are now torn apart by sectarianism and war.3 over 5,000 to almost 60,000.5 There was nothing inevitable nor accidental about the Patterns of violence also changed. With each failure of the international community’s failure to prevent Syria’s Security Council to hold the Syrian government accountable conflagration. Three years ago in February 2012, for the for its actions, President Bashar al-Assad’s forces deployed second time since the conflict began, Russia and China vetoed more extreme armed force. This, in turn, strengthened a United Nations (UN) Security Council draft resolution the most uncompromising and severe elements within the aimed at holding the Syrian government accountable for armed opposition, especially those with external sources crimes against humanity. Watching the discussion in the of sustenance. The net effect has been to turn Syria into chamber after the vote, the depth of un-diplomatic emotion the world’s worst case of ongoing mass atrocities, civilian was palpable. In particular, Susan Rice, then United displacement and humanitarian catastrophe. As such, States Ambassador to the UN and now President Barack the permanent members of the Security Council bear a Obama’s National Security Advisor, said her government special burden of responsibility for their failure to protect was “disgusted” by the veto of a resolution intended to the Syrian people.
Recommended publications
  • ABUSING the LEGACY of the HOLOCAUST: the ROLE of Ngos in EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS to DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M
    ABUSING THE LEGACY OF THE HOLOCAUST: THE ROLE OF NGOs IN EXPLOITING HUMAN RIGHTS TO DEMONIZE ISRAEL Gerald M. Steinberg In the wake of the Holocaust, as human rights norms have come to the fore, NGOs have become major actors in international politics in general and in the Arab-Israeli conflict in particular. These organizations and their leaders form an extremely powerful “NGO community” that has propelled the anti-Israeli agenda in international frameworks such as the UN Human Rights Commission and the 2001 UN Conference against Racism in Durban. Through their reports, press releases, and influence among academics and diplomats, these NGOs propagated false charges of “massacre” during the Israeli army’s antiterror operation in Jenin (Defensive Shield) and misrepresent Israel’s separation barrier as an “apartheid wall.” This community has exploited the “halo effect” of human rights rhetoric to promote highly particularistic goals. In most cases small groups of individuals, with substantial funds obtained from non- profit foundations and governments (particularly European), use the NGO frameworks to gain influence and pursue private political agendas, without being accountable to any system of checks and balances. Jewish Political Studies Review 16:3-4 (Fall 2004) 59 60 Gerald M. Steinberg This process has been most salient in the framework of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The ideology of anticolonialism (the precursor to today’s antiglobalization) and political correctness is dominant in the NGO community. This ideology accepted the post-1967 pro-Palestinian narrative and images of victimization, while labeling Israel as a neocolo- nialist aggressor. Thus, behind the human rights rhetoric, these NGOs are at the forefront of demonizing Israel and of the new anti-Semitism that seeks to deny the Jewish people sovereign equality.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and Russian Governments Involvement in the Syrian Crisis and the United Nations’ Kofi Annan Peace Process
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 5 No 27 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2014 The United States and Russian Governments Involvement in the Syrian Crisis and the United Nations’ Kofi Annan Peace Process Ken Ifesinachi Ph.D Professor of Political Science, University of Nigeria [email protected] Raymond Adibe Department of Political Science, University of Nigeria [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n27p1154 Abstract The inability of the Syrian government to internally manage the popular uprising in the country have increased international pressure on Syria as well as deepen international efforts to resolve the crisis that has developed into a full scale civil war. It was the need to end the violent conflict in Syria that informed the appointment of Kofi Annan as the U.N-Arab League Special Envoy to Syria on February 23, 2012. This study investigates the U.S and Russian governments’ involvement in the Syrian crisis and the UN Kofi Annan peace process. The two persons’ Zero-sum model of the game theory is used as our framework of analysis. Our findings showed that the divergence on financial and military support by the U.S and Russian governments to the rival parties in the Syrian conflict contradicted the mandate of the U.N Security Council that sanctioned the Annan plan and compromised the ceasefire agreement contained in the plan which resulted in the escalation of violent conflict in Syria during the period the peace deal was supposed to be in effect. The implication of the study is that the success of any U.N brokered peace deal is highly dependent on the ability of its key members to have a consensus, hence, there is need to galvanize a comprehensive international consensus on how to tackle the Syrian crisis that would accommodate all crucial international actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Arab Republic
    Syrian Arab Republic News Focus: Syria https://news.un.org/en/focus/syria Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Syria (OSES) https://specialenvoysyria.unmissions.org/ Syrian Civil Society Voices: A Critical Part of the Political Process (In: Politically Speaking, 29 June 2021): https://bit.ly/3dYGqko Syria: a 10-year crisis in 10 figures (OCHA, 12 March 2021): https://www.unocha.org/story/syria-10-year-crisis-10-figures Secretary-General announces appointments to Independent Senior Advisory Panel on Syria Humanitarian Deconfliction System (SG/SM/20548, 21 January 2021): https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/sgsm20548.doc.htm Secretary-General establishes board to investigate events in North-West Syria since signing of Russian Federation-Turkey Memorandum on Idlib (SG/SM/19685, 1 August 2019): https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/sgsm19685.doc.htm Supporting the future of Syria and the region - Brussels V Conference, 29-30 March 2021 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2021/03/29-30/ Supporting the future of Syria and the region - Brussels IV Conference, 30 June 2020: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2020/06/30/ Third Brussels conference “Supporting the future of Syria and the region”, 12-14 March 2019: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2019/03/12-14/ Second Brussels Conference "Supporting the future of Syria and the region", 24-25 April 2018: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2018/04/24-25/
    [Show full text]
  • ASOR Cultural Heritage Initiatives (CHI): Planning for Safeguarding Heritage Sites in Syria and Iraq1
    ASOR Cultural Heritage Initiatives (CHI): Planning for Safeguarding Heritage Sites in Syria and Iraq1 S-JO-100-18-CA-004 Weekly Report 209-212 — October 1–31, 2018 Michael D. Danti, Marina Gabriel, Susan Penacho, Darren Ashby, Kyra Kaercher, Gwendolyn Kristy Table of Contents: Other Key Points 2 Military and Political Context 3 Incident Reports: Syria 5 Heritage Timeline 72 1 This report is based on research conducted by the “Cultural Preservation Initiative: Planning for Safeguarding Heritage Sites in Syria and Iraq.” Weekly reports reflect reporting from a variety of sources and may contain unverified material. As such, they should be treated as preliminary and subject to change. 1 Other Key Points ● Aleppo Governorate ○ Cleaning efforts have begun at the National Museum of Aleppo in Aleppo, Aleppo Governorate. ASOR CHI Heritage Response Report SHI 18-0130 ○ Illegal excavations were reported at Shash Hamdan, a Roman tomb in Manbij, Aleppo Governorate. ASOR CHI Incident Report SHI 18-0124 ○ Illegal excavation continues at the archaeological site of Cyrrhus in Aleppo Governorate. ASOR CHI Incident Report SHI 18-0090 UPDATE ● Deir ez-Zor Governorate ○ Artillery bombardment damaged al-Sayyidat Aisha Mosque in Hajin, Deir ez-Zor Governorate. ASOR CHI Incident Report SHI 18-0118 ○ Artillery bombardment damaged al-Sultan Mosque in Hajin, Deir ez-Zor Governorate. ASOR CHI Incident Report SHI 18-0119 ○ A US-led Coalition airstrike destroyed Ammar bin Yasser Mosque in Albu-Badran Neighborhood, al-Susah, Deir ez-Zor Governorate. ASOR CHI Incident Report SHI 18-0121 ○ A US-led Coalition airstrike damaged al-Aziz Mosque in al-Susah, Deir ez-Zor Governorate.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Transnational Rebellion: The Syrian Revolt of 1925-1927 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/99q9f2k0 Author Bailony, Reem Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Transnational Rebellion: The Syrian Revolt of 1925-1927 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Reem Bailony 2015 © Copyright by Reem Bailony 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Transnational Rebellion: The Syrian Revolt of 1925-1927 by Reem Bailony Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor James L. Gelvin, Chair This dissertation explores the transnational dimensions of the Syrian Revolt of 1925-1927. By including the activities of Syrian migrants in Egypt, Europe and the Americas, this study moves away from state-centric histories of the anti-French rebellion. Though they lived far away from the battlefields of Syria and Lebanon, migrants championed, contested, debated, and imagined the rebellion from all corners of the mahjar (or diaspora). Skeptics and supporters organized petition campaigns, solicited financial aid for rebels and civilians alike, and partook in various meetings and conferences abroad. Syrians abroad also clandestinely coordinated with rebel leaders for the transfer of weapons and funds, as well as offered strategic advice based on the political climates in Paris and Geneva. Moreover, key émigré figures played a significant role in defining the revolt, determining its goals, and formulating its program. By situating the revolt in the broader internationalism of the 1920s, this study brings to life the hitherto neglected role migrants played in bridging the local and global, the national and international.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Demographic Engineering in Syria No Return to Homs a Case Study on Demographic Engineering in Syria
    No Return to Homs A case study on demographic engineering in Syria No Return to Homs A case study on demographic engineering in Syria Colophon ISBN/EAN: 978-94-92487-09-4 NUR 689 PAX serial number: PAX/2017/01 Cover photo: Bab Hood, Homs, 21 December 2013 by Young Homsi Lens About PAX PAX works with committed citizens and partners to protect civilians against acts of war, to end armed violence, and to build just peace. PAX operates independently of political interests. www.paxforpeace.nl / P.O. Box 19318 / 3501 DH Utrecht, The Netherlands / [email protected] About TSI The Syria Institute (TSI) is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan research organization based in Washington, DC. TSI seeks to address the information and understanding gaps that to hinder effective policymaking and drive public reaction to the ongoing Syria crisis. We do this by producing timely, high quality, accessible, data-driven research, analysis, and policy options that empower decision-makers and advance the public’s understanding. To learn more visit www.syriainstitute.org or contact TSI at [email protected]. Executive Summary 8 Table of Contents Introduction 12 Methodology 13 Challenges 14 Homs 16 Country Context 16 Pre-War Homs 17 Protest & Violence 20 Displacement 24 Population Transfers 27 The Aftermath 30 The UN, Rehabilitation, and the Rights of the Displaced 32 Discussion 34 Legal and Bureaucratic Justifications 38 On Returning 39 International Law 47 Conclusion 48 Recommendations 49 Index of Maps & Graphics Map 1: Syria 17 Map 2: Homs city at the start of 2012 22 Map 3: Homs city depopulation patterns in mid-2012 25 Map 4: Stages of the siege of Homs city, 2012-2014 27 Map 5: Damage assessment showing targeted destruction of Homs city, 2014 31 Graphic 1: Key Events from 2011-2012 21 Graphic 2: Key Events from 2012-2014 26 This report was prepared by The Syria Institute with support from the PAX team.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (2012 年 7 月 29 日にアクセス)
    2014年 2 月 The 1st volume 【編集ボード】 委員長: 鈴木均 内部委員: 土屋一樹、齋藤純、ダルウィッシュ ホサム、石黒大岳、 渡邊祥子、福田安志 外部委員: 内藤正典 本誌に掲載されている論文などの内容や意見は、外部からの論稿を含め、執筆者 個人に属すものであり、日本貿易振興機構あるいはアジア経済研究所の公式見解を 示すものではありません。 中東レビュー 第 1 号 2014 年 2 月 28 日発行© 編集: 『中東レビュー』編集ボード 発行: アジア経済研究所 独立行政法人日本貿易振興機構 〒261-8545 千葉県千葉市美浜区若葉 3-2-2 URL: http://www.ide.go.jp/Japanese/Publish/Periodicals/Me_review/ ISSN: 2188-4595 ウェブ雑誌『中東レビュー』の創刊にあたって 日本貿易振興機構アジア経済研究所では 2011 年初頭に始まったいわゆる「アラブの春」と その後の中東地域の政治的変動に対応して、これまで国際シンポジウムや政策提言研究、アジ 研フォーラムなどさまざまな形で研究成果の発信と新たな研究ネットワークの形成に取り組ん できた。今回、中東地域に関するウェブ雑誌『中東レビュー』を新たな構想と装いのもとで創 刊しようとするのも、こうした取り組みの一環である。 当研究所は 1975 年 9 月刊行の『中東総合研究』第 1 号以来、中東地域に関する研究成果を 定期的に刊行される雑誌の形態で公開・提供してきた。1986 年 9 月以降は『現代の中東』およ び『中東レビュー』として年 2 回の刊行を重ねてきたが、諸般の事情により『現代の中東』は 2010 年 1 月刊行の第 48 号をもって休刊している。『中東レビュー』はこれらの過去の成果を 直接・間接に継承し、新たな環境のもとでさらに展開させていこうと企図するものである。 今回、不定期刊行のウェブ雑誌『中東レビュー』を新たに企画するにあたり、そのひとつの 核として位置づけているのが「中東政治経済レポート」の連載である。「中東政治経済レポート」 はアジ研の中東関係の若手研究者を中心に、担当する国・地域の政治・経済および社会について の情勢レポートを随時ウェブ発信し、これを年に一度再編集して年次レポートとして継続的に 提供していく予定である。 『中東レビュー』のもうひとつの核は、変動しつつある現代中東を対象とした社会科学的な 論稿の掲載である。論稿についても随時ウェブサイトに掲載していくことで、執筆から発表ま でのタイムラグを短縮し、かつこれを『中東レビュー』の総集編に収録する段階で最終的にテ キストを確定するという二段階方式を採用する。なお使用言語は当面日本語と英語の2カ国語 を想定しており、これによって従来よりも広範囲の知的交流を図っていきたいと考えている。 『中東レビュー』はアジア経済研究所内外にあって中東地域に関心を寄せる方々の、知的・ 情報的な交流のフォーラムとなることを目指している。この小さな試みが中東地域の現状につ いてのバランスの取れた理解とアジ研における中東研究の新たな深化・発展に繋がりますよう、 改めて皆様の温かいご理解とご支援をお願いいたします。 『中東レビュー』編集ボード 委員長 鈴木 均 1 目 次 ウェブ雑誌『中東レビュー』の創刊にあたって 鈴木 均 Hitoshi Suzuki・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・1 ページ 中東政治経済レポート 中東政治の変容とイスラーム主義の限界 Paradigm Shift of the Middle
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • ISCACH (Beirut 2015) International Syrian Congress on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
    ISCACH (Beirut 2015) International Syrian Congress on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 3‐6 DECEMBER 2015 GEFINOR ROTANA HOTEL BEIRUT, LEBANON ISCACH (Beirut 2015) International Syrian Congress on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 3‐6 DECEMBER 2015 GEFINOR ROTANA HOTEL BEIRUT, LEBANON © The ISCACH 2015 Organizing Committee, Beirut Lebanon All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission. Title: ISCASH (International Syrian Congress on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage) 2015 Beirut: Program and Abstracts Published by the ISCACH 2015 Organizing Committee and the Archaeological Institute of Kashihara, Nara Published Year: December 2015 Printed in Japan This publication was printed by the generous support of the Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan ISCACH (Beirut 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……….……………………………………………………….....................................3 List of Organizing Committee ............................................................................4 Program Summary .............................................................................................5 Program .............................................................................................................7 List of Posters ................................................................................................. 14 Poster Abstracts.............................................................................................. 17 Presentation Abstracts Day 1: 3rd December ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Council Fact-Finding in S
    Marauhn: Sailing Close to the Wind: Human Rights Council Fact-Finding in S SAILING CLOSE TO THE WIND: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL FACT-FINDING IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT-THE CASE OF SYRIA THILO MARAUHN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FROM GRAFFITI IN DARA'A TO CIVIL WAR IN SYRIA ............ 402 II. SECURITY COUNCIL INACTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ...... ..... 408 COUNCIL ACTIVISM ........................................... 408 A. Governments' Responses to the Situation in Syria ............. 409 B. Inaction of the U.N. Security Council .............. 415 C. Actions Taken by the U.N. General Assembly and the U.N. Human Rights Council ................. ....... 421 III. THE RISK OF BEING ALL-INCLUSIVE: BLURRING THE LINES.........426 A. Does the Situation in Syria Amount to a Non-International Armed Conflict? ...................... ..... 426 B. The Application ofHuman Rights Law in a Non-International Armed Conflict........................434 C. Fact-finding in Human Rights Law vs Fact-Finding with Respect to the Law ofArmed Conflict....... ............ 444 D. Does Blurringthe Lines Weaken Compliance with the Applicable Law? ................................448 IV. THE BENEFITS OF SAILING CLOSE TO THE WIND .................. 452 V. IMPROVING COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT .............................................. 455 CONCLUSION ....................................... ....... 458 * M.Phil. (Wales), Dr. jur.utr. (Heidelberg), Professor of Public Law, International and European Law, Faculty of Law, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany. The author is grateful to Charles H. B. Garraway, Colonel (ret.), United Kingdom; Nicolas Lang, Ambassador-at-Large for the Application of International Humanitarian Law, Switzerland; and Dr. Ignaz Stegmiller, Justus Liebig University, Germany for comments on earlier drafts. 401 Published by CWSL Scholarly Commons, 2013 1 California Western International Law Journal, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Syrian Supplemental
    PRISM syria A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS About PRISM PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners Vol. 4, Syria Supplement on complex and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; 2014 relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development Editor Michael Miklaucic Communications Contributing Editors Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Alexa Courtney communications to: David Kilcullen Nate Rosenblatt Editor, PRISM 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Copy Editors Fort Lesley J. McNair Dale Erikson Washington, DC 20319 Rebecca Harper Sara Thannhauser Lesley Warner Telephone: Nathan White (202) 685-3442 FAX: (202) 685-3581 Editorial Assistant Email: [email protected] Ava Cacciolfi Production Supervisor Carib Mendez Contributions PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Advisory Board and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States Dr. Gordon Adams and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to prism@ Dr. Pauline H. Baker ndu.edu with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Ambassador Rick Barton Professor Alain Bauer This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted Ambassador James F. Dobbins without permission of the copyright proprietors. PRISM should be acknowledged whenever material is quoted from or based on its content.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the Un Intervene Into to Oppressive Regimes?
    NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF LAW MASTER’S PROGRAM MASTER’S THESIS SHOULD THE UN INTERVENE INTO TO OPPRESSIVE REGIMES? A COMPARATIVE EXAMINATIONS OF THE LEGAL OF HUMAN RIGHT JUSTIFICATIONS FOR INTERVENING IN AFGHANISTAN AND LIBYA AND THE INACTION IN SYRIA Hadi Abdullah MAWLOOD NICOSIA 2016 NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF LAW MASTER’S PROGRAM MASTER’S THESIS SHOULD THE UN INTERVENE INTO TO OPPRESSIVE REGIMES? A COMPARATIVE EXAMINATIONS OF THE LEGAL OF HUMAN RIGHT JUSTIFICATIONS FOR INTERVENING IN AFGHANISTAN AND LIBYA AND THE INACTION IN SYRIA PREPARED BY Hadi Abdullah MAWLOOD 20135446 Supervisor Asst. Prof. Dr Resat Volkan GUNEL NICOSIA 2016 NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Department of Law Master’s Program Thesis Defence Thesis Title: Should The UN Intervene Into To Oppressive Regimes? A Comparative Examinations of The Legal Of Human Right Justifications For Intervening In Afghanistan And Libya And The Inaction In Syria We certify the thesis is satisfactory for the award of degree of Master of Law Prepared By: Hadi Abdullah MAWLOOD Examining Committee in charge Asst. Prof. Dr. Reşat Volkan Günel Near East University Thesis Supervisor Head of Law Department Dr. Tutku Tugyan Near East University Law Department ….………………… Near East University ………… Department Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. MUSTAFA SAĞSAN Acting Director iii ABSTRACT The establishment of the United Nations is for the sole reason of protecting the entire peace and for the entire human race. The protection and advancement of Human Rights as innate and enforceable rights are the known tenets behind the establishment of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]