DOCSLIB.ORG

The Stickleback Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Stickleback Model Introduction: The Stickleback Model Frank A. von Hippel “With respect to reptiles and fishes,” wrote Charles Darwin (1871) in The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, “too little is known of their habits to enable us to speak of their marriage arrangements. The stickleback (Gasterosteus), however, is said to be a polygamist; and the male during the breeding-season differs conspicuously from the female.” With this introduction to the stickleback, Darwin set the stage for its development as a model organism in behavioural studies. And just one year after the publication of The Descent of Man, Darwin (1872) published The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, which, along with his chapter on instinct in The Origin of Species (Darwin, 1859) launched ethology as a science by applying the ideas of natural and sexual selection to the study of behaviour. He concluded his chapter on instinct with a summary of his theory of natural selection, as applied to behaviour: “Finally, it may not be a logical deduction, but to my imagination it is far more satisfactory to look at such instincts as the young cuckoo ejecting its fosters-brothers, — ants making slaves, — the larvæ of ichneumonidæ feeding within the live bodies of caterpillars, — not as specially endowed or created instincts, but as small consequences of one general law leading to the advancement of all organic beings, — namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.” Darwin used the comparative approach with both his animal and hu- man subjects. The co-discoverer of natural selection, Alfred Russel Wallace, wrote in his review of Darwin’s book on the expression of emotions (Wal- lace, 1873): By means of a series of questions sent to correspondents in various parts of the world, Mr. Darwin has ascertained that many well-known modes of expression are almost universal. Even such an apparently conventional action as the shrug of helplessness or apologetic refusal has been ob- served among various savage races. Being thus proved to be natural, not © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 Tinbergen’s Legacy in Behaviour, 3-11 4 von Hippel an acquired, expression, it becomes necessary to account for it, and this is done on the principle of antithesis; every part of the expression being the opposite of that which implies determination and action. Comparatively few human expressions, on the other hand, can be distinctly recognized in animals, that of sneering by raising the upper lip on one side, and thus showing the canine teeth, being one of the most curious. The technique of comparative biology, as established by Darwin, was taken up by Niko Tinbergen. It was Tinbergen who built upon what was al- ready a good body of work on threespine stickleback (first described by Lin- naeus in 1758 as Gasterosteus aculeatus, which means ‘belly bone spined’) and made them a model in ethology. Tinbergen’s book (1951), The Study of Instinct, marked a critical achievement in the maturation of ethology as a scientific enterprise. In it, Tinbergen illustrated his vision of ethology with comparative examples from throughout the animal kingdom, but with special attention paid to threespine stickleback. Of the 210 pages of text, threespine stickleback appears on 42 of them, as well as the photo plate opposite the ti- tle page. The highly ritualized behaviour of the stickleback appealed to Tin- bergen’s penchant for experimentation. The stickleback responded well to models, and this discovery gave rise to a flurry of experiments using dummy males and females. The ease of maintaining stickleback in the lab also ap- pealed to Tinbergen, for here was an animal that could be studied in natural and artificial environments. Tinbergen’s reliance on the stickleback and his other favourite species led one reviewer to write, “In its current stage, ethol- ogy resembles a patchwork quilt, pieced together with bits of stickleback, wasp, cichlid, duck, herring gull, etc., the whole seeming to cover the real- ity better than any theory thus far advanced” (Greenberg, quoted in Kruuk, 2003). Three years before the publication of The Study of Instinct, in 1948, Tin- bergen founded the journal Behaviour to serve the burgeoning field of ethol- ogy. The first issue of the journal included Tinbergen and van Iersel’s (1948) classic paper, “‘Displacement reactions’ in the three-spined stickleback.” By the time Tinbergen received the Nobel Prize in 1973, his former students, such as Jan van Iersel, Piet Sevenster and Desmond Morris, had greatly ex- panded the utility of the stickleback model through their discoveries in the behaviour of the reproductive cycle. The threespine stickleback’s role as a model organism expanded beyond the confines of ethology in the 1960s and 1970s to include morphological.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alfred Russel Wallace and the Darwinian Species Concept
    Gayana 73(2): Suplemento, 2009 ISSN 0717-652X ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE AND THE Darwinian SPECIES CONCEPT: HIS paper ON THE swallowtail BUTTERFLIES (PAPILIONIDAE) OF 1865 ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE Y EL concepto darwiniano DE ESPECIE: SU TRABAJO DE 1865 SOBRE MARIPOSAS papilio (PAPILIONIDAE) Jam ES MA LLET 1 Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London UK, NW1 2HE E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Soon after his return from the Malay Archipelago, Alfred Russel Wallace published one of his most significant papers. The paper used butterflies of the family Papilionidae as a model system for testing evolutionary hypotheses, and included a revision of the Papilionidae of the region, as well as the description of some 20 new species. Wallace argued that the Papilionidae were the most advanced butterflies, against some of his colleagues such as Bates and Trimen who had claimed that the Nymphalidae were more advanced because of their possession of vestigial forelegs. In a very important section, Wallace laid out what is perhaps the clearest Darwinist definition of the differences between species, geographic subspecies, and local ‘varieties.’ He also discussed the relationship of these taxonomic categories to what is now termed ‘reproductive isolation.’ While accepting reproductive isolation as a cause of species, he rejected it as a definition. Instead, species were recognized as forms that overlap spatially and lack intermediates. However, this morphological distinctness argument breaks down for discrete polymorphisms, and Wallace clearly emphasised the conspecificity of non-mimetic males and female Batesian mimetic morphs in Papilio polytes, and also in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Selection: Charles Darwin & Alfred Russel Wallace
    Search | Glossary | Home << previous | next > > Natural Selection: Charles Darwin & Alfred Russel Wallace The genius of Darwin (left), the way in which he suddenly turned all of biology upside down in 1859 with the publication of the Origin of Species , can sometimes give the misleading impression that the theory of evolution sprang from his forehead fully formed without any precedent in scientific history. But as earlier chapters in this history have shown, the raw material for Darwin's theory had been known for decades. Geologists and paleontologists had made a compelling case that life had been on Earth for a long time, that it had changed over that time, and that many species had become extinct. At the same time, embryologists and other naturalists studying living animals in the early 1800s had discovered, sometimes unwittingly, much of the A visit to the Galapagos Islands in 1835 helped Darwin best evidence for Darwin's formulate his ideas on natural selection. He found theory. several species of finch adapted to different environmental niches. The finches also differed in beak shape, food source, and how food was captured. Pre-Darwinian ideas about evolution It was Darwin's genius both to show how all this evidence favored the evolution of species from a common ancestor and to offer a plausible mechanism by which life might evolve. Lamarck and others had promoted evolutionary theories, but in order to explain just how life changed, they depended on speculation. Typically, they claimed that evolution was guided by some long-term trend. Lamarck, for example, thought that life strove over time to rise from simple single-celled forms to complex ones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malay Archipelago
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT The Malay Archipelago: the land of the orang-utan, and the bird of paradise; a IN RETROSPECT narrative of travel, with studies of man and nature ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE The Malay Macmillan/Harper Brothers: first published 1869. lfred Russel Wallace was arguably the greatest field biologist of the nine- Archipelago teenth century. He played a leading Apart in the founding of both evolutionary theory and biogeography (see page 162). David Quammen re-enters the ‘Milky Way of He was also, at times, a fine writer. The best land masses’ evoked by Alfred Russel Wallace’s of his literary side is on show in his 1869 classic, The Malay Archipelago, a wondrous masterpiece of biogeography. book of travel and adventure that wears its deeper significance lightly. The Malay Archipelago is the vast chain of islands stretching eastward from Sumatra for more than 6,000 kilometres. Most of it now falls within the sovereignties of Malaysia and Indonesia. In Wallace’s time, it was a world apart, a great Milky Way of land masses and seas and straits, little explored by Europeans, sparsely populated by peoples of diverse cul- tures, and harbouring countless species of unknown plant and animal in dense tropical forests. Some parts, such as the Aru group “Wallace paid of islands, just off the his expenses coast of New Guinea, by selling ERNST MAYR LIB., MUS. COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, HARVARD UNIV. HARVARD ZOOLOGY, LIB., MUS. COMPARATIVE MAYR ERNST were almost legend- specimens. So ary for their remote- he collected ness and biological series, not just riches. Wallace’s jour- samples.” neys throughout this region, sometimes by mail packet ship, some- times in a trading vessel or a small outrigger canoe, were driven by a purpose: to collect animal specimens that might help to answer a scientific question.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Russel Wallace's Record of His Consignments to Samuel Stevens, 1854-1861
    ZM 75 251-342 | 16 (baker) 12-01-2007 07:52 Page 251 Alfred Russel Wallace’s record of his consignments to Samuel Stevens, 1854-1861 D.B. Baker Baker, D.B. Alfred Russel Wallace’s record of his consignments to Samuel Stevens, 1854-1861. Zool. Med. Leiden 75 (16). 24.xii.2001: 251-341, figs 1-19.— ISSN 0024-0672. D.B. Baker, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford OX1 3PW, U.K. Keywords: A.R. Wallace; C. Allen; S. Stevens; Malaysia; Indonesia; biography; biogeography; bio- diversity. An annotated facsimile of those pages of Alfred Russel Wallace’s notebook recording his consign- ments from the Malay Archipelago to his London agent, Samuel Stevens, is provided. Records of indi- vidual consignments are linked with the stages of Wallace’s and Charles Allen’s itineraries to which they relate and are amplified from data provided by Wallace elsewhere; wherever possible, dates and places of the despatch of consignments and of the dates of their receipt in London are noted; and the dates of material becoming available for study are established, chiefly from British Museum acces- sions registers. It is intended that this should provide readier access to scattered collection data and should in particular assist in determining what specimens may properly be regarded as types or syn- types of the many taxa described by numerous contemporary authors from Wallace’s material. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 254 The notebook ....................................................................................................................................... 254 The emphasis of Wallace’s collecting ...................................................................................... 254 Profit and loss; the dispersal of Wallace’s material .......................................................... 255 The publication of Wallace’s collections ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Home Home > History > Darwin and Wallace
    The Society Media & Events Membership Publications Collections Library Awards History Links Home Home > History > Darwin and Wallace 1 Carl Linnaeus Darwin, Wallace and the Linnean Society Sir James Edward Smith Darwin and Wallace Charles Darwin About the Darwin-Wallace Paper The Darwin-Wallace Paper Charles Darwin was elected a Fellow of the Linnean Society of London on 7 March 1854, nominated for (Complete) Fellowship by Thomas Bell, Sylvester Hanley, Edward Forbes, Robert Brown, John S. Henslow, James J. Bennett and A. White. He remained an active Fellow throughout his life, using the Library as a resource and reviewing papers submitted to the Society. We also received from him copies of his publications which now are a treasured part of the Library. He died on 19 April 1882 and is buried in Westminster Abbey. Alfred Russel Wallace Alfred Russel Wallace was elected to Fellowship of the Society somewhat later, on 18 January 1871 and remained a Fellow until his death on 7 November 1913. He was nominated for Fellowship by George Bentham, H.T.Stainton, J.D.Hooker, A.W.Bennett, S. Stevens, A. Muller, E.W.H. Holdsworth, A. Newton, W.H. Flower, J.W. Dunning, G.R.Gray, and E. Sheppard. By that time he was well established figure in natural history. The Charles Darwin Society is lucky to hold a number of his manuscripts, as well as much of his biological library, often with (1809 - 1882) interesting marginal annotations. The Darwin-Wallace Papers The opportunity to present the joint papers outlining evolutionary theory, with papers by both Darwin and Wallace, on 1 July 1858, arose because of the death of the Vice President, Robert Brown, on 10 June 1858.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Taxonomy
    History of Taxonomy The history of taxonomy dates back to the origin of human language. Western scientific taxonomy started in Greek some hundred years BC and are here divided into prelinnaean and postlinnaean. The most important works are cited and the progress of taxonomy (with the focus on botanical taxonomy) are described up to the era of the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, who founded modern taxonomy. The development after Linnaeus is characterized by a taxonomy that increasingly have come to reflect the paradigm of evolution. The used characters have extended from morphological to molecular. Nomenclatural rules have developed strongly during the 19th and 20th century, and during the last decade traditional nomenclature has been challenged by advocates of the Phylocode. Mariette Manktelow Dept of Systematic Biology Evolutionary Biology Centre Uppsala University Norbyv. 18D SE-752 36 Uppsala E-mail: [email protected] 1. Pre-Linnaean taxonomy 1.1. Earliest taxonomy Taxonomy is as old as the language skill of mankind. It has always been essential to know the names of edible as well as poisonous plants in order to communicate acquired experiences to other members of the family and the tribe. Since my profession is that of a systematic botanist, I will focus my lecture on botanical taxonomy. A taxonomist should be aware of that apart from scientific taxonomy there is and has always been folk taxonomy, which is of great importance in, for example, ethnobiological studies. When we speak about ancient taxonomy we usually mean the history in the Western world, starting with Romans and Greek. However, the earliest traces are not from the West, but from the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Nye - Biography, Facts and Pictures
    5/9/2016 Bill Nye - Biography, Facts and Pictures Home List of Scientists Blog Bill Nye Search Famous Scientists SEARCH Scientist of the Week André Marie Ampère: Founded electromagnetic theory Recent Scientists of the Week Jane Goodall: Discoveries in chimpanzee behavior James Hutton: Founded modern geology Harold Urey: Deuterium and the building blocks of life Andreas Vesalius: Founded modern anatomy Niels Bohr: Quantum mechanics & the atom Barbara McClintock: Jumping genes & crossing chromosomes Francis Bacon: The Scientific Method “The Science Guy.” William Sanford Nye who goes by his more popular moniker Anaximander: An ancient scientific revolution Bill Nye is a science educator who began his career in science as one of Boeing’s mechanical engineers. He is most popularly known as Bill Nye the Science Guy Heinrich Hertz: Discovered radio waves and photoelectric effect where he hosts the Disney/PBS science show for children. Bill Nye is also a Charles Darwin: Evolution by natural selection comedian, actor, scientist, and a writer. He has gained popularity for his many Robert Boyle: The birth of chemistry appearances in today’s media as a fun to watch science educator. Srinivasa Ramanujan: The purest mathematics Ernest Lawrence: Invented the cyclotron; founder of big science Early Life and Education Rudolf Virchow: Discovered diseases strike by attacking cells Irene Joliot­Curie: The first artificial radioactive elements Hans Christian Oersted: Discovered electromagnetism Bill Nye was born in November 27, 1955. His mother was a codebreaker named Jack Horner: New horizons in dinosaur research Jacqueline, and his World War II veteran father was named Edwin Darby. His father had experienced being a prisoner of Japanese war camps, and this made Ronald Fisher: Statistician; and greatest biologist since Darwin? him an enthusiast of sundials.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Russel Wallace and the Destruction of Island Life: the Iguana Tragedy
    Theory Biosci. DOI 10.1007/s12064-013-0193-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Alfred Russel Wallace and the destruction of island life: the Iguana tragedy Ulrich Kutschera • Simon Kleinhans Received: 7 March 2013 / Accepted: 3 June 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract The Gala´pagos Islands (Ecuador) are usually Introduction associated with the explorations and theoretical deductions of Charles Robert Darwin (1809–1882), but Alfred Russel The British naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913) Wallace (1823–1913) also investigated these islands and was a proficient writer, and the author/editor of 22 books published several reports on the living world of this unique on scientific and social issues (Shermer 2002; Smith and archipelago. In contrast to Darwin, Wallace described the Beccaloni 2008). After the publication of his bestseller The destruction of natural ecosystems by humans and foresaw Malay Archipelago (1869), Wallace wrote several addi- the resulting extinction of species. Here, we outline two tional monographs on similar topics, which were related to case studies pertinent to Wallace’s prediction. First, we each other. Accordingly, Wallace considered his 1880 summarize the behavior of the predator-naive marine book Island Life as a ‘‘popular supplement to and com- iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) on the Gala´pagos pletion’’ of his earlier 2-volume-treatise entitled The Geo- Islands, which are threatened by feral dogs and cats graphical Distribution of Animals (Wallace 1880, p. VII). imported by humans. We also describe the unique life The 57-year-old author dedicated his ‘‘Island book’’ to ‘‘Sir cycle of the spiny-tailed iguana (Ctenosaura bakeri) from Joseph Dalton Hooker, who, more than any other writer, the island of Utila (Honduras), a rare species whose pop- has advanced our knowledge of the geographical distribu- ulations are declining because of habitat destructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Confusion and Cohesion in Emerging Sciences : Darwin, Wallace, and Social Darwinism
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 Confusion and cohesion in emerging sciences : Darwin, Wallace, and social Darwinism. Edward S. Rayher University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Rayher, Edward S., "Confusion and cohesion in emerging sciences : Darwin, Wallace, and social Darwinism." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2292. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2292 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. c 315Dt.bDmiS5 JflO CONFUSION AND COHESION IN EMERGING SCIENCES DARWIN , WALLACE, AND SOCIAL DARWINISM A Dissertation Presented by EDWARD S. RAYHER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 1996 Department of Philosophy (cT) Copyright by Edward S. Rayher 1996 All Rights Reserved CONFUSION AND COHESION IN EMERGING SCIENCES DARWIN , WALLACE, AND SOCIAL DARWINISM A Dissertation Presented by EDWARD S. RAYHER Approved as to style and content by: fcwr K- 4-tu- 1 Robert J f . Ackermann, Chair Stan Rachootin, Member Robison, Department Head For Alfred Russel Wallace, if his spirit still likes to read. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks are due to Bob Ackermann for his patience and guidance. The Alternate Track also deserves thanks for making my stay at the University interesting and productive.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Genetics Book Collection Catalogue
    History of Genetics Book Collection Catalogue Below is a list of the History of Genetics Book Collection held at the John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK. For all enquires please contact Mike Ambrose [email protected] +44(0)1603 450630 Collection List Symposium der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Hygiene und Mikrobiologie Stuttgart Gustav Fischer 1978 A69516944 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 5th international congress on tropical agriculture 28-31 July 1930 Brussels Imprimerie Industrielle et Finangiere 1930 A6645004483 œ.00 30/3/1994 7th International Chromosome Conference Oxford Oxford 1980 A32887511 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 20/2/1991 7th International Chromosome Conference Oxford Oxford 1980 A44688257 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 26/6/1992 17th international agricultural congress 1937 1937 A6646004482 œ.00 30/3/1994 19th century science a selection of original texts 155111165910402 œ14.95 13/2/2001 150 years of the State Nikitsky Botanical Garden bollection of scientific papers. vol.37 Moscow "Kolos" 1964 A41781244 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Haldane John Burdon Sanderson 1892-1964 A banned broadcast and other essays London Chatto and Windus 1946 A10697655 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Matsuura Hajime A bibliographical monograph on plant genetics (genic analysis) 1900-1929 Sapporo Hokkaido Imperial University 1933 A47059786 BOOK-HG HG œ.00 15/10/1996 Hoppe Alfred John A bibliography of the writings of Samuel Butler (author of "erewhon") and of writings about him with some letters from Samuel Butler to the Rev. F. G. Fleay, now first published London The Bookman's Journal
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of Alfred Russel Wallace's Theories, 1823-1848
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2016 Facts Are Stubborn Things: The oundF ation of Alfred Russel Wallace's Theories, 1823-1848 Sabrina Rae Cervantez Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cervantez, Sabrina Rae, "Facts Are Stubborn Things: The oundF ation of Alfred Russel Wallace's Theories, 1823-1848" (2016). LSU Master's Theses. 1900. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1900 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS: THE FOUNDATION OF ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE’S THEORIES, 1823-1848 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Sabrina Rae Cervantez B.A., The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 May 2016 © [2016/Copyright] Sabrina Rae Cervantez All Rights Reserved ii This thesis is dedicated with love to my family. My parents, Rudy and Linda Cervantez My brother, Woody Cervantez III iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The present thesis is the culmination of four years of research spanning my undergraduate and graduate career from 2013 to 2016. By no means was it a completely solitary effort.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History Museum General Library Manuscripts Section
    The Natural History Museum General Library Manuscripts Section Alfred Russel Wallace Family Papers c1790-2000 The Natural History Museum General Library Manuscripts Section Alfred Russel Wallace Family Papers c1790-2000 WP Contents Wallace papers collection (fonds) level information……….p.1 WP1…………………………………………………………p.4 WP2………………………………………………………p.182 WP3………………………………………………………p.203 WP4………………………………………………………p.208 WP5………………………………………………………p.215 WP6………………………………………………………p.217 WP7………………………………………………………p.261 WP8………………………………………………………p.299 WP9………………………………………………………p.305 WP10……………………………………………………..p.309 WP11……………………………………………………..p.313 WP12……………………………………………………..p.316 WP13……………………………………………………..p.326 WP14……………………………………………………..p.331 WP15……………………………………………………..p.339 WP16……………………………………………………..p.348 WP17……………………………………………………..p.378 WP18……………………………………………………..p.394 Exported/printed March 2005 The Natural History Museum General Library Manuscripts Section Alfred Russel Wallace Family Papers c1790 – 2000 WP The collection includes personal and related family papers, correspondence, accounts of expenditure, publisher's proofs, reprints, photographs, certificates, pamphlets, press-cuttings, lecture notes and obituaries. The correspondence includes letters from Richard Spruce, and letters written by Wallace to his family from Canada, c. 1886-1887, to his son William c. 1889-1911, to his daughter Violet, to Herbert Walter Bates, and to the Clarion newspaper. Siblings with whom he corresponded or who mentioned in these papers include older brothers William G [George] (died c. 1845), John (c.1819-1895) older sisters Eliza (died 1832) and Frances (Fanny, Mrs Thomas Sims; died 1893) and younger brother Herbert Edward (c.1829- 1851). WP1 Correspondence c. 1838-1913 WP2 Biographical Material and Portraits c. 1850?-1916 WP2/6 Papers re James Marchant's "Letters and Memoirs . ." [1881] c. 1913-1916 WP3 Diaries, Notebooks and Sketchbooks c. 1846-1893 and undated WP4 Houses and architecture, papers re c.
    [Show full text]