DOCSLIB.ORG

A Synopsis of the Mosquitoes of Illinois(Diptera,Culicidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENTOF REGISTRATIONAND EDUCATION NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION A SYNOPSIS OF THE MOSQUITOES OF ILLINOIS (Diptera,Culicidae) Herbert H. Ross Willbm R. Horsf•,11 IllinoisNatural History Survey BiologicalNotes No. 52 Urbana,Illinois March, 1965 CONTENTS DIAGNOSISOF MOSQUITOES.................... 4 KEYS TO CULICIDAE LARVAE .................... 25 KEY TO CULICIDAE AND CHAOBORIDAE........... 4 Key to Generaof Culicidae(Larvae) .......... 26 Adults (Both Sexes) ....................... 4 Key to Speciesof Aedes(Larvae) ............. 29 Larvae ................................... 5 Key to Speciesof Anopheles(Larvae) ......... 37 LIST OF INCLUDED SPECIES ...................... 5 Key to Speciesof Culex (Larvae)............. 39 KEY TO SEXES OF CULICIDAE ADULTS ............. 5 Key to Speciesof Cullseta(Larvae) ........... 40 Key to Speciesof Orthopodomyia(Larvae) ..... 43 KEYS TO CULICIDAE FEMALES .................. 5 Key to Speciesof Psorophora(Larvae) ......... 43 Key to Generaof Culicidae(Females) ......... 6 KEYS TO CULICIDAE EGGS...................... 44 Key to Speciesof aledes(Females) ............ 8 Key to Generaof Culicidae(Eggs) ............. 44 Key to Speciesof alnopheles(Females) ........ 12 Key to Speciesof Aedes(Eggs) ............... 45 Key to Speciesof Culex(Females) ............ 13 Key to Speciesof Psorophora(Eggs) .......... 47 Key to Speciesof Cullseta(Females) .......... 14 Key to Speciesof Orthopodomyia(Females) .... 14 MOSQUITOESAND DISEASE..................... 48 Key to Speciesof Psorophora(Females) ....... 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................... 49 KEYS TO CULICIDAEMALES ..................... 14 SELECTEDREFERENCES ........................ 49 Key to Generaof Culicidae(Males) .......... 15 LITERATURECITED IN THE ILLUSTRATIONS........ 49 Key to Speciesof Aedes(Males) ............. 16 INDEX ...................................... 50 Key to Speciesof Anopheles(Males) .......... 22 Key to Speciesof Culex(Males) .............. 22 COVERDRAWING.--One of the largest Illinois mosquitoesis the "gallinipper,"Psorophora ciliata, which may attain a wing- Key to Speciesof Culiseta(Males) ............ 24 spreadof 15 mm (overhalf an inch). It is a viciousbiter and Key to Speciesof Orthopodomyia(Males) ...... 24 is widelydistributed over Illinois. The larvaeor wrigglersof this speciesbreed in rainpools and have the habit of feedingon larvae Key to Speciesof Psorophora(Males) ......... 24 of other mosquitospecies. A SYNOPSISOF "' THE MOSQUITOES '; OFILLINOIS (Diptera,Culicidae) / Herberr H. Ross William R. Horsfall ............ ß...... •----•.•-• •.•. FIG. 1.--Adult of Aedesaegypti. (From photograph,lent by the U.S. Public Health Service, of model in the American Museum of Natural History.) TO ALL OF US WHO LIVE IN ILLINOIS, mos- of their life histories. All of them,however, have many quitoesare familiaras pests that attackpersons and live- characters and habits in common. The immature form stockout of doorsfrom springto fall. or larva (known as a wriggler) is aquatic,that is, it They may be of greater consequencethan simply livesin water. This form requiresseveral to manydays as biting pests. Somekinds are solelyresponsible for to becomea full-grownlarva. At this time, it transforms transmittingcertain parasites to man and domesticani- into the next life historystage, the pupal (as pupae, mals. Blood parasitessuch as thosethat causemalaria, mosquitoesare called tumblers), and this stage also is yellowfever, dengue, and filariasis must have mosquitoes aquatic. The pupal stage,which lastsonly a few days, to take them from sickto well persons. Severalof the is a transformationstage; within the pupathe tissuesof encephalitis-producingultramicroscopic viruses that at- the larva are transformed into those of the adult mos- tackthe brainand spinalcord are carriedsolely by mos- quito. When the transformationis complete,the pupa quitoesfrom wild animalsto man or from man to man. floats at the surface of the water, its shell cracks and Past control efforts againstmosquitoes have reduced breaksthe surfacefilm, and the wingedadult emerges. someof thesediseases to insignificance.Other diseases Adult mosquitoes(Fig. 1) are entirelyaerial and carriedby mosquitoesstill riseat timesto plagueus. neverenter the water. After a period of feedingand To date,mosquitoes of 55 differentspecies have been mating, the femaleslay eggseither on the surfaceof taken in Illinois. Seven additional species,known in the water or in soil that will be flooded at a later date. neighboringstates from situationssimilar to those in Eggslaid on the waterhatch in a few days;each small this state,may alsooccur in Illinois and are includedin larva emergesdirectly into the water from the end of this synopsis.These 62 species,along with severalhun- the eggthat sticksinto it. Eggslaid in soil hatchwhen dred more in other parts of the world, constitutethe thesoil is floodedand the eggsare covered by the right family Culicidae. This family and a hundredor more kind of water. additionalfamilies of two-wingedflies together comprise This synopsisprovides means for identifyingthe the orderDiptera. mosquitoeslikely to be found in Illinois. It contains The Illinois speciesof mosquitoesdiffer from each keysto eggs,larvae, and adults,because the sanitarian, other in the habitatsthey frequentand in manydetails ecologist,and collectorworking with mosquitoeswill find all stagesof the insectsand may not havethe time This paper is printed by authority of the State of Illinois, or meansto rear the insectsto other stages. It is an IRS Ch. 127, Par. 58.22. It is a contribution from the Section of raunistic Surveys and Insect Identification of the Illinois extensionof the originalreport, The MosquitoesoJ Illi- Natural History Survey. Dr. Ross is head of that section. Dr. YIorsfall is a Professor of Entomology, Department of Ento- nois (Ross1947) in that it includesmore speciesand mology, University of Illinois. The authors wish to express special thanks to James S. presentsa key to eggsof floodwatermosquitoes. Most Ayars, the Survey's Technical Editor, for the creative way in which he has contributed to the production of this Synopsis. of thekeys in thissynopsis have been enlarged from the YIis unstinting and understanding help in simplifying terminol- original report; someof the illustrationsare from the ogy, rephrasing couplets, and clarifying concepts has made this publication useful to a much wider circle. originalreport and some are new. For convenience,the keysto generaand specieshave gateproboscis many times as long as the head, (2) an- beenarranged according to the life historystages of the tennaewhich are much longer than the head and are insects.A personwishing to identifya femalemosquito composedof manysmall, well-separated segments, many will find all the keys for the identificationof females, segmentseach with a ring of hairs, and (3) wings with both to generaand to specieswithin the variousgenera, an arrangementof veins depictedin Fig. 6. A pupa groupedtogether in the samesection. Keys for the is characterizedby being active in water, by having a identificationof males,larvae, and eggsare groupedin curledposture, and by havinga pair of respiratorytubes similar fashion. At the head of each section there is on the dorsumof the thorax (Fig. 2). The pupaeare includeda diagramof the stageconcerned. The dia- gramsare labeledto show the diagnosticareas or parts mentionedin the keys. If only one speciesof a genus occursin Illinois, it is indicatedand treatedin the keys to genera. Eachof the other speciesis treatedin one of the keysto genera;these keys are arrangedalphabeti- callyby genera. Names of certaingenera and speciesmay appearin more than one placei n a key. This practiceallows the useof a large numberof charactersfor recognizingcer- tain distinctivegroups of specieswithin a genusor cer- tain distinctivevariations within a species. The cardinaldirections used for orientingparts of the mosquitobody or appendagesare as follows: apex---Theportion away from the point of attachment; concerningthe abdomenor its segments,the part F•G. 2.--Pupa of mosquito. The two respiratorytubes are more distant from the head. visible in the upper left part of drawing. (After King, Bradley, apical--On or pertainingto the apex. & McNeel 1939.) base--Theportion at the point of attachment;in rela- tion to the abdomenor its segments,the part nearer not diagnosedin this report. A larva of the Culicidae the head. canbe differentiatedfrom other aquatic,free-swimming basal--Onor pertainingto the base. insect larvae by the following combinationof charac- anterior--Forward, toward the head, or in front of. ters: (1) legsabsent; (2) head large and possessinga posterior--Backward,toward the rear, or backof. hard covering; (3) thorax large and wider than the dorsum--Theupper part or back. abdomen;(4) the respiratorysystem opening dorsally dorsal--Onor pertainingto the dorsum. on the next-to-lastsegment of the abdomen;(5) four dorsally--In the directionof the dorsum. blade-like"gills" extendingposteriorly from end of last lateral--Onor pertainingto thesides. abdominalsegment (Fig. 125, 126). In many species, laterally--In the directionof the sides. the larva hasa long or stout,usually hard and dark, air meson--Themidline down the lengthof the animal. tube (Fig. 125). Eggsof mosquitoesare blackor gray mesal--Onor pertainingto the meson. in color,sausage-like or spindle-likein shape,and each renter--The underpart or belly. not morethan 1 mm long. ventral--On or pertainingto the venter. Membersof
Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years of Surveillance for Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus In

    Twenty Years of Surveillance for Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus In

    Oliver et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:362 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2950-1 RESEARCH Open Access Twenty years of surveillance for Eastern equine encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in New York State from 1993 to 2012 JoAnne Oliver1,2*, Gary Lukacik3, John Kokas4, Scott R. Campbell5, Laura D. Kramer6,7, James A. Sherwood1 and John J. Howard1 Abstract Background: The year 1971 was the first time in New York State (NYS) that Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) was identified in mosquitoes, in Culiseta melanura and Culiseta morsitans. At that time, state and county health departments began surveillance for EEEV in mosquitoes. Methods: From 1993 to 2012, county health departments continued voluntary participation with the state health department in mosquito and arbovirus surveillance. Adult female mosquitoes were trapped, identified, and pooled. Mosquito pools were tested for EEEV by Vero cell culture each of the twenty years. Beginning in 2000, mosquito extracts and cell culture supernatant were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: During the years 1993 to 2012, EEEV was identified in: Culiseta melanura, Culiseta morsitans, Coquillettidia perturbans, Aedes canadensis (Ochlerotatus canadensis), Aedes vexans, Anopheles punctipennis, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Psorophora ferox, Culex salinarius, and Culex pipiens-restuans group. EEEV was detected in 427 adult mosquito pools of 107,156 pools tested totaling 3.96 million mosquitoes. Detections of EEEV occurred in three geographical regions of NYS: Sullivan County, Suffolk County, and the contiguous counties of Madison, Oneida, Onondaga and Oswego. Detections of EEEV in mosquitoes occurred every year from 2003 to 2012, inclusive. EEEV was not detected in 1995, and 1998 to 2002, inclusive.
  • Mosquito Species Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks With

    Mosquito Species Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks With

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mosquito species identifcation using convolutional neural networks with a multitiered ensemble model for novel species detection Adam Goodwin1,2*, Sanket Padmanabhan1,2, Sanchit Hira2,3, Margaret Glancey1,2, Monet Slinowsky2, Rakhil Immidisetti2,3, Laura Scavo2, Jewell Brey2, Bala Murali Manoghar Sai Sudhakar1, Tristan Ford1,2, Collyn Heier2, Yvonne‑Marie Linton4,5,6, David B. Pecor4,5,6, Laura Caicedo‑Quiroga4,5,6 & Soumyadipta Acharya2* With over 3500 mosquito species described, accurate species identifcation of the few implicated in disease transmission is critical to mosquito borne disease mitigation. Yet this task is hindered by limited global taxonomic expertise and specimen damage consistent across common capture methods. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are promising with limited sets of species, but image database requirements restrict practical implementation. Using an image database of 2696 specimens from 67 mosquito species, we address the practical open‑set problem with a detection algorithm for novel species. Closed‑set classifcation of 16 known species achieved 97.04 ± 0.87% accuracy independently, and 89.07 ± 5.58% when cascaded with novelty detection. Closed‑set classifcation of 39 species produces a macro F1‑score of 86.07 ± 1.81%. This demonstrates an accurate, scalable, and practical computer vision solution to identify wild‑caught mosquitoes for implementation in biosurveillance and targeted vector control programs, without the need for extensive image database development for each new target region. Mosquitoes are one of the deadliest animals in the world, infecting between 250–500 million people every year with a wide range of fatal or debilitating diseases, including malaria, dengue, chikungunya, Zika and West Nile Virus1.
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA

    Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA

    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
  • 1 It's All Geek to Me: Translating Names Of

    1 It's All Geek to Me: Translating Names Of

    IT’S ALL GEEK TO ME: TRANSLATING NAMES OF INSECTARIUM ARTHROPODS Prof. J. Phineas Michaelson, O.M.P. U.S. Biological and Geological Survey of the Territories Central Post Office, Denver City, Colorado Territory [or Year 2016 c/o Kallima Consultants, Inc., PO Box 33084, Northglenn, CO 80233-0084] ABSTRACT Kids today! Why don’t they know the basics of Greek and Latin? Either they don’t pay attention in class, or in many cases schools just don’t teach these classic languages of science anymore. For those who are Latin and Greek-challenged, noted (fictional) Victorian entomologist and explorer, Prof. J. Phineas Michaelson, will present English translations of the scientific names that have been given to some of the popular common arthropods available for public exhibits. This paper will explore how species get their names, as well as a brief look at some of the naturalists that named them. INTRODUCTION Our education system just isn’t what it used to be. Classic languages such as Latin and Greek are no longer a part of standard curriculum. Unfortunately, this puts modern students of science at somewhat of a disadvantage compared to our predecessors when it comes to scientific names. In the insectarium world, Latin and Greek names are used for the arthropods that we display, but for most young entomologists, these words are just a challenge to pronounce and lack meaning. Working with arthropods, we all know that Entomology is the study of these animals. Sounding similar but totally different, Etymology is the study of the origin of words, and the history of word meaning.
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8

    Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  • A Mosquito Psorophora Ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V

    A Mosquito Psorophora Ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V

    EENY-540 A Mosquito Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Ephraim V. Ragasa and Phillip E. Kaufman2 Introduction For additional information on mosquitoes, see http://edis. ifas.ufl.edu/IN652. Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius) is a large mosquito (Cutwa and O’Meara 2005) that has developed an outsized reputa- tion because of its relatively intimidating heft and persistent Synonymy biting behavior (Gladney and Turner 1969), including Psorophora ciliata (Fabricius 1794) anecdotal historical accounts of its legendary aggressiveness Culex ciliata Fabricius (1794) (Wallis and Whitman 1971) and ‘frightening appearance’ Culex conterrens Walker (1856) (King et al. 1960). The ‘gallinipper’ or ‘shaggy-legged Culex molestus Weidemann (1820) gallinipper’ was used as a common name for Psorophora Culex rubidus Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) ciliata in various published reports (Ross 1947; King et al. Psorophora boscii Robineau-Desvoidy (1827) 1960; Breeland et al. 1961; Goddard et al. 2009). The term Psorophora ctites Dyar (1918) was mentioned much earlier by Flanery (1897) describing (From ITIS 2011) the mosquito as ‘the little zebra-legged thing—the shyest, slyest, meanest, and most venomous of them all’ [sic] but Distribution did not specify what species it was. The word gallinipper Psorophora ciliata usually is associated with other flood- originated as a vernacular term in the southeastern region water mosquitoes, including many species from the Aedes of the United States referring to ‘a large mosquito or other genera (Breeland et al. 1961), and has a wide distribution insect that has a painful bite or sting’ and has appeared in the New World. Floodwater mosquitoes often lay in folk tales, traditional minstrel songs, and a blues their eggs in low-lying areas with damp soil and grassy song referencing a large mosquito with a ‘fearsome bite’ overgrowth.
  • RESCON 2020 Proceedings

    RESCON 2020 Proceedings

    POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF PERADENIYA SRI LANKA PGIS RESEARCH CONGRESS 2020 PROCEEDINGS 26th - 28th November 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Postgraduate Institute of Science All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, stored in a retrieval system, and transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN 978-955-8787-10-6 Published by Postgraduate Institute of Science (PGIS) University of Peradeniya Peradeniya 20400 SRI LANKA Printed by Sanduni Offset Printers (Pvt) Ltd, 1/4, Sarasavi Uyana Goodshed Road, Sarasavi Uyana, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka Printed in the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Director, Postgraduate Institute of Science ....................................... v Message from the Congress Chairperson ..................................................................... vii Message from the Editor-in-Chief .................................................................................ix Message from the Chief Guest .......................................................................................xi Editorial Board ............................................................................................................ xiii Academic Coordinators of the Virtual Technical Sessions .........................................xiv A Brief Biography of the Keynote Speaker .................................................................
  • ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies

    ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies

    64 ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies - Greenwoods, Summer 1995 Wi~~iam L. Butts Expanded sampling of the area inunediately adj acent to the large bog ("Cranberry Bog") for anthrophilic mosquitoes was the main focus of studies at Greenwoods. Initial plans to conduct biting/alighting sampling from a boat at selected sites around the margin of the impoundment were abandoned due to logistical difficulties. Emergent and submerged obstructions made it impossible to move about by boat at a rate that would allow for sampling at a sufficient number of sites within the hours of feeding activity. It was also evident that repeated sampling by boat would cause an unacceptable level of disruption to aquatic vegetation. A series of eight sampling sites marked with bicolored streamers was established along the west side of the bog from the point of access to the main dam northward. A similar series was laid out along the east side with three sampling stations south of the one at the dock site and four stations north of it. Biting/alighting collections were made by the author sitting for 20 minutes at each site with one forearm exposed. Mosquitoes alighting upon that arm or at other points on the body within reach of the other arm were collected by inverting a small killing vial over the mosquitoes. Sampling series were begun at approximately first light and in late evening beginning at a time estimated to terminate the series when unaided visual observation became difficult. In most instances one side of the bog was sampled in the evening and the other side the following morning.
  • The Mosquitoes of Minnesota

    The Mosquitoes of Minnesota

    Technical Bulletin 228 April 1958 The Mosquitoes of Minnesota (Diptera : Culicidae : Culicinae) A. RALPH BARR University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station ~2 Technirnl Rull!'lin :z2g 1-,he Mosquitoes of J\ilinnesota (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicinae) A. llALPII R\lm University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station CONTENTS I. Introduction JI. Historical Ill. Biology of mosquitoes ................................ Zoogeography Oviposition ......................................... Breeding places of larvae ................................... I) Larrnl p;rowth ....................................... Ill ,\atural factors in the control of larvae .................. JI The pupal stage ............................................... 12 .\lating .................................... _ ..... 12 Feeding of adults ......................................... 12 Hibernation 11 Seasonal distribution II I\ . Techniques Equipment Eggs ............................... · .... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Larvae Pupae Adults Colonization and rearing . IB \. Systematic treatment Keys to genera Adult females . l'J \fale terminalia . 19 Pupae ······················································· .... ········ 2.'i Larvae ····················································· ..... ········ 2S :-n Anopheles ········································· ··························· Anopheles (Anopheles) barberi .................... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · earlei ...•......................... · · · · ·
  • A Synopsis of the Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance from a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject

    A Synopsis of the Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance from a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject

    A Synopsis of The Mosquitoes of Missouri and Their Importance From a Health Perspective Compiled from Literature on the Subject by Dr. Barry McCauley St. Charles County Department of Community Health and the Environment St. Charles, Missouri Mark F. Ritter City of St. Louis Health Department St. Louis, Missouri Larry Schaughnessy City of St. Peters Health Department St. Peters, Missouri December 2000 at St. Charles, Missouri This handbook has been prepared for the use of health departments and mosquito control pro- fessionals in the mid-Mississippi region. It has been drafted to fill a perceived need for a single source of information regarding mosquito population types within the state of Missouri and their geographic distribution. Previously, the habitats, behaviors and known distribution ranges of mosquitoes within the state could only be referenced through consultation of several sources - some of them long out of print and difficult to find. It is hoped that this publication may be able to fill a void within the literature and serve as a point of reference for furthering vector control activities within the state. Mosquitoes have long been known as carriers of diseases, such as malaria, yellow fever, den- gue, encephalitis, and heartworm in dogs. Most of these diseases, with the exception of encephalitis and heartworm, have been fairly well eliminated from the entire United States. However, outbreaks of mosquito borne encephalitis have been known to occur in Missouri, and heartworm is an endemic problem, the costs of which are escalating each year, and at the current moment, dengue seems to be making a reappearance in the hotter climates such as Texas.
  • Mosquitoes in Ohio

    Mosquitoes in Ohio

    Mosquitoes in Ohio There are about 60 different species of mosquito in Ohio. Several of them are capable of transmitting serious, possibly even fatal diseases, such as mosquito-borne encephalitis and malaria to humans. Even in the absence of disease transmission, mosquito bites can result in allergic reactions producing significant discomfort and itching. In some cases excessive scratching can lead to bleeding, scabbing, and possibly even secondary infection. Children are very susceptible to this because they find it difficult to stop scratching. Frequently, they are outside playing and do not realize the extent of their exposure until it is too late. Female mosquitoes can produce a painful bite during feeding, and, in excessive numbers, can inhibit outdoor activities and lower property values. Mosquitoes can be a significant burden on animals, lowering productivity and efficiency of farm animals. Life Cycle Adult mosquitoes are small, fragile insects with slender bodies; one pair of narrow wings (tiny scales are attached to wing veins); and three pairs of long, slender legs. They vary in length from 3/16 to 1/2 inch. Mosquitoes have an elongate "beak" or piercing proboscis. Eggs are elongate, usually about 1/40 inch long, and dark brown to black near hatching. Larvae or "wigglers" are filter feeders that move with an S-shaped motion. Larvae undergo four growth stages called instars before they molt into the pupa or "tumbler" stage. Pupae are comma-shaped and non-feeding and appear to tumble through the water when disturbed. 1 Habits and Diseases Carried Mosquitoes may over-winter as eggs, fertilized adult females or larvae.
  • Metropolitan Mosquito Control District 2020 Operational Review & Plans for 2021

    Metropolitan Mosquito Control District 2020 Operational Review & Plans for 2021

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. https://www.lrl.mn.gov METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT 2020 OPERATIONAL REVIEW & PLANS FOR 2021 Annual Report to the Technical Advisory Board Joe Elling, Field Operations Supervisor, Plymouth Facility, testing larvicide treatments by drone in a small wetland. MMCD photo Metro Counties Government Center ~ 2099 University Avenue West ~ St. Paul, MN 55104-3431 www.mmcd.org Metropolitan Mosquito Control District Mission Technical Advisory Board The MMCC formed the TAB in 1981 to provide annual, The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District’s mission is to promote health and well-being by independent review of the field control programs, to enhance protecting the public from disease and annoyance inter-agency cooperation, and to facilitate compliance with caused by mosquitoes, black flies, and ticks in an Minnesota State Statute 473.716. environmentally sensitive manner. Technical Advisory Board Members Governance 2020-2021 The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District, Stephen Kells, Chair University of Minnesota established in 1958, controls mosquitoes and Donald Baumgartner US EPA gnats and monitors ticks in the metropolitan Phil Monson Mn Pollution Control Agency counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. The District John Moriarty Three Rivers Park District operates under the eighteen-member Metropolitan Elizabeth Schiffman Mn Department of Health Mosquito Control Commission (MMCC), Gary Montz Mn Dept. of Natural Resources composed of county commissioners from the Susan Palchick Hennepin Co. Public Health participating counties. An executive director is responsible for the operation of the program and Robert Sherman Independent Statistician reports to the MMCC.