Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft
Ramon Lobato; Julian Thomas Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 2019 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13670
Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article
Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Lobato, Ramon; Thomas, Julian: Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising. In: Marek Jancovic, Axel Volmar, Alexandra Schneider (Hg.): Format Matters. Standards, Practices, and Politics in Media Cultures. Lüneburg: meson press 2019, S. 65–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13670.
Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0/ Attribution - Share Alike 4.0/ License. For more information see: Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ [3] Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising
Ramon Lobato and Julian Thomas
Leaderboards,pushdowns,skyscrapers,expandables,interstitials, carouselads,sponsoredsearchresults,promotedtweets,full-page takeovers,recommendationwidgets—theseareafewoftheadvertising formatsthatconsumersarelikelytoencounterintheireverydayinter- netuse.Sincetheinventionofgraphicalwebbrowsersintheearly1990s, hundredsofadformatshaveappearedanddisappearedfromtheweb, fromfamiliarbannersandbillboardstobespokevideo,audio,andmobile formatsforspecificplatformslikeSnapchatandSpotify.Withtherapid developmentofmobilemedia,adformatsdesignedforsmartphoneshave furtherproliferatedandcross-pollinatedwithdesktop-specificformats.
Theseformatsareofinteresttomediascholarsforseveralreasons.They haveintroducednewanddiverseaestheticformsintoeverydaydigital culture;generateddistinctiveeconomicpractices,includingreal-time biddingandcomplex“ad-tech”valuechains;and,inthecaseofpop-ups andvideoads,attractedcriticismfordegradingusers’onlineexperience, spreadingmalware,wastingbandwidth,andspawninganewad-blocking industry.Notwithstandingtheimportantworkofinternetadvertising scholars(Turow2011;Gehl2014;Crain2013),andtheparallelprofessional literatureontheeffectivenessofparticularadformats(Rejón-Guardiaand Martínez-López2017),researchinthisarearemainssomewhatscarce.Con- sequently,thehistoriesof theseadformats,andthecomplexdistribution andgovernancesystemsbehindthem,remainpoorlyunderstood. 66 Format Matters
Thischaptertellsonepartofthelargerstory.Ourfocushereisonhow internetadformatscametobestandardized(tosomedegreeatleast)and whatthismeansforwiderdebatesabouttheinstitutionalandtechnical governanceofmediaformats.Foralmosttwentyyearstheindustry’skey lobbyandstandardsgroup,theInteractiveAdvertisingBureau(IAB),has beentryingto“formalize”(LobatoandThomas2015)theunrulyadvertising marketsoftheinternet,toestablishinteroperabletechnicalstandards,and toweedoutaberrantformatsandpractices—withonlylimitedsuccess.In thischapterweexplorethereasonsforthispartialfailureofformalization. Wearguethatinternetadvertising,comparedtoolderadvertisingformats inprintandbroadcastmedia,ischaracterizedbyaproliferation of formats as well as their instability.Beyondthelegitimateconcernsaboutinternet advertising,automation,andsurveillance,wesuggestthereisalsoanother storytobetoldhereaboutthelimitsofstandardization—itssuccessand failure—inahighlyfragmented,increasinglyautomated,andinternallycon- flictedsectorofthemediaindustries.
Internet Advertising Formats
The term format hasaspecificmeaningwithininternetadvertising.Beyond referringtothemanydifferentkindsofadvertisingthatappearonline (video,mobile,text,in-app,andsoon),formatalsodesignatesthe technical attributesthatdeterminehowanadappearsandbehavestotheuser. Theseattributesincludebasicpropertiessuchasdimensionsandratio, aswellasmoretechnicalattributessuchasfiletype,filesize,definition, CPUload,autoplayfeatures,filerequests,expandability,andthepresence orabsenceofclosebuttons.Wemayalsoseeadistinctionbetweenthe formatsofadinventory,thespacespublishersprovideonwebsitesorin appsforadcontent,andtheformatsofcreative,thetermusedtodenote actualadcontent.Thetwoarenotalwaysthesame.Insomecases,format isalsousedtorefertothetradinganddistributionsystemsunderlying specificadtypes,suchasreal-timebiddingandretargeting.Thereis,in otherwords,aloosenessinhowthetermisusedbothwithinandbeyond advertisingindustrypractice.
Whenstudyinginternetads,itishelpfultobeginwithadistinctionbetween standardformatsandcustomformats.Standardformats,suchasthebill- boardandtheleaderboard,arethebasicdisplayunitsofwebadvertising. Mostofthesehaveevolvedinanad-hocwayovermanyyearsoftrialand experimentationamongpublishers.Witnessingtheenormousexpansion ofdweban latermobileadvertisingsincethe1990sandthesimultaneous Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 67 proliferationofscreensizesanddevicetypes,advertisingindustrystake- holdershavelongrecognizedtheneedforstandardization.
Oneoftheindustrybodieschargedwithresponsibilityforstand- ardizingformatsistheInteractiveAdvertisingBureau,whichhasbeen issuingstandardsandprotocolstoencourageinteroperabilityininternet advertisingsinceitsfoundingin1996.BasedinNewYork,with43offices aroundtheworld,theIABistheprivatestandard-settingbodyforinter- netadvertising.Itsfundingcomesfromannualmembercontributions paidbymajorbrands,adagencies,technologyproviders,andother companiesseekingaseatatthetableforregulatoryandtechnicaldiscus- sionsaffectingtheindustry.TheIABalsoperformsadispute-settlement functionbymediatingconflictsastheyariseintheindustryandproposing technicalsolutionstoaddressindustryproblems(thoughIABpolicies, whichareprivateinnatureandhavenolegalstanding,arefrequently ignoredbyadvertisers).Overthelasttwodecades,asinternetadvertising hasmigratedfromthewebtoplatforms,theIABhasbeenincreasingly tornbetweenitscoremembershipbase—mostofwhomarepublishers, agencies,andad-techproviders—andthenew“duopoly”ofGoogleand Facebookwhosebusinessmodelsposeadirectthreattomany ofitsother members.Assuch,theIABisaninherentlyfragmentedandconflict-ridden organization.
TheIAB’skeystandardsdocumentistheIABAdPortfolio,whichispub- lishedannuallyandcontainsalistofapprovedformatsandtheirtechnical specifications.Theaimoftheportfolioistominimizeproductioncosts foradvertisersandenableautomatedplacementoftheirartworkacross millionsofdifferentwebsites,platforms,andapps.Becausetheever- increasingnumberofmobiledevicesandscreensizesposesachallengefor anystandardizedportfolio,theIABhasinrecentyearsmovedawayfrom fixed-sizeadstowardflexiblesizeadformats(22intotal)thatcanbescaled upanddownasneeded.Theseflexiblesizeformatsareshownintable1. Alsoincludedisaselectionofothercurrentandsomehistoric“delisted”ad formats,whichhavedisappearedfrommainstreamusebutstillappearat themarginsoftheweb(oncasinoandtorrentsites,forexample). 68 Format Matters
Current IAB flexible display Other common Older display formats formats formats in use delisted by IAB 2x1horizontal(Halfpage) Paidsearch Pop-ups 4x1horizontal(Billboard) Recommendation Floatingads 6x1horizontal(Smartphone widgets Auto-expansion banner) Promotedlisting Hoverorrollover 8x1horizontal(Leaderboard) In-gameads expansion 10x1horizontal(Super In-bannervideo Forcedcountdown leaderboard/pushdown) Video360 Scrollover/scrolling 1x2vertical Pushnotifications overlay 1x3vertical(Portrait) Lockscreenads Flashinganimation 1x4vertical(Skyscraper) Audioin-streamads Adhesion/stickyads 1x1tiles(MediumRectangle) Chatbots Expandwhilescrolling 2x1tiles(Financial) VRandARads Underlayads Fullpageportrait(various Brandedemojis dimensions) Fullpagelandscape(various dimensions) Featurephonesizes(small, medium,largebanner)
[Table1]Interactiveadvertisingformats.Sources:IAB(2017)andReina(2017).
Customformatsarethesecondfamilyofinternetadvertisingformats. Unlikestandardformats,whichrequireahighdegreeoftechnicaluni- formity,customformatsareownedandcontrolledbyspecificplat- forms.Forexample,Twitter’ssignatureadformatisthePromotedTweet; SnapchatisknownforitsLensesandFiltersthatoverlaybrandinformation ontousers’photos;andSpotifyoffersSponsoredPlaylistsandSponsored Sessions.Customformats,inotherwords,areallaboutdifferentiationand novelty,ratherthanstandardization.
OneofthemostfamouscustomformatsisAdwords,Google’ssignature adproduct,whichwaslaunched inbetain2000.TheAdwordsformat isdeceptivelysimple.Advertisersprovideafewlinesoftext,atarget URL,andthesearchtermstheywanttheiradstoappearalongside(for example,“toothache”isanattractivetermforlocaldentists).Everytime ausersearchesonGoogle,areal-timeauctionoccursbetweenpotential advertisersbiddingonthedesignatedkeyword(s)todeterminewhosead appearsintheresults.Wheretheadappearsthendependsalsoonits relevancetothesearch,calculatedbyGoogle’salgorithms.Thehumble Adwordsformat,withitsunfashionableplain-textaestheticanditsself- serve,cost-per-clickmodel,hasbeenextraordinarilysuccessful;itisthe coreofGoogle’svastadvertisingandartificialintelligenceenterprise. Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 69
WhileGooglephasedouttheAdwordsbrandin2018,replacingitwiththe monikerGoogleAds,thiswasapurelycosmeticchange;theunderlying technologyandbusinessprocessesofAdwordscontinuetogeneratemost ofGoogle’srevenues.
Understoodintheseterms,thesuccessofAdwordscanbeseenasa reactiontotheinefficienciesorperceivedfailuresofitsrivalformats,and thebannerformatinparticular.Inthecontextofthetechcrashoftheearly 2000s,thebannerwasanexpensive,intrusiveformat.Itwasthecreation ofprintmediapublishers(thefirstbanneradsappearedin Wired’s online publication Hotwired circa1994),anditemulatedthedisplayadsofprint media.AsthetradepaperDigiday putit,“Foryears,thebanneradwasthe workhorseofdigitaladvertising,andwhatamiserablenagitwas:Banners haddiminishedclick-throughrates,stymiedpublishers’webdesigners andinfuriatedagenerationofreaderswhosawsitesgetmoreandmore crowdedwithads”(Willens2016).Incontrast,theAdwordsformatwasnew, inexpensive,lower-bandwidth,andautomated.Andunlikethebanner,its pricereflectedamarketoperatinginrealtimeanditsrelevancetousers ratherthanapricesetbypublishers.eW returntotheAdwordsformat belowinthecontextofautomation.
Othertitansofthetecheconomyhavetheirowncustomformats.Amazon, ane-commerceplatformwithalucrativeadvertisingandinfrastructure businessontheside,sellsarangeofcustomformats,includinglanding pagesforbrands,sponsoredsearchresults,anddailydeal“sitestripes.” Atthesametime,AmazonalsosellsdisplayadsinstandardIABformats, suchasbannersandrectangles,whichappearinvariousplacesastheuser searchesforproductsontheAmazonwebsiteorapp.Theendresultisan unusuallydensecommercialenvironmentofferingawidearrayoftouch points.Ausershoppingforjeans,forexample,mightseeaLevi’svideo ad,aLevi’slandingpage,orLevi’s-sponsoredsearchresultsatvarious pointsintheirsearch.Eachoftheseformatsistheresultofalongprocess ofresearchanddevelopment,aswellascarefulcalculationweighingthe revenuepotentialagainsttheriskofuserexperiencedegradation.
Astheseexamplessuggest,novel,customadformatsareakeyfoundation oftheinterneteconomy.Morethansimplytechnicalspecificationsto ensureinteroperability,formatsarenexuspointswherethemediabuying sideofadvertisinginteracts withthecreativeside;wherecommercial, aestheticandtechnicallogicsintertwine;andwheretheduelingforcesof standardizationanddifferentiationenterintoproductivetension. 70 Format Matters
The Political Economy of Ad Formats
Internetadvertisingreliesonaconstantchurnofformats.Comparedto otherareasofthemediaindustries—suchasbroadcastandradio—inter- activeformatsarehighlyunstable.Whilethe30-secondadhasbeenthe mainstayoftelevisionadvertisingsincethe1970s,manyformatsusedin web,mobile,andonlinevideoadvertisingarebarelyafewyearsold.In otherwords,thereisenormousinnovation,andinstability,inthissectorof themediaindustries.
Thelongreignofthe30-secondtelevisioncommercialreliedonthe extendedpostwarhegemonyofthecommercialTVbroadcastingsystem. Hardwareandtechnicalstandardsevolvedslowlyandincrementally,and standardanalogscreenresolutionspersistedoveranextendedperiod, withagradualtransitiontodigitalequivalentsfromtheturnofthecentury. Periodicuser-drivendisruptions—remotecontrols,videorecorders— challengedadformatsandshapedindustryresponses,justasadblockers arenowdisruptinginternetadvertising.Butscreensizesandprogram formatsremainedrelativelystable.
Thecontemporarysituationisdifferent.Convergencehasdestabilizedthe formatsystem,asadvertisers,publishers,andplatformsexperimentwith newwaystocommanduserattention.Itcouldbearguedthatformats themselvesarethebasic“products”oftheinternetadvertisingindustry, even thoughtheycannotbeboughtbyaconsumer.Forplatformsespe- cially,formatsareapointofcompetitivedifference:thebusinessofrunning aplatforminvolvesinventing,refining,andmarketingnewadformatsthat canreachaudiencesineffectiveways.Theseformatscanthenbepricedas premiumadproductsdeliveringeffective,targetedmessagingthatcannot bereplicatedbyotherplatforms.
ConsiderthecaseofFacebook,whichhasdevelopeddozensofcustom formatssinceitsearlyyearsasanonlinecollegedirectory.Facebook’s firstadformatwastheFlyer,averticaltext-and-imagedisplayboxthat appearedonthesideofthehomescreen.TheFlyerwasakintoaclas- sifiedadvertisementandwasusedmostlybyUScollegestudentsandlocal businessescateringtothosestudents.LaterFacebookadformatsincluded Pages,SponsoredGroups,andSponsoredStories(fig.1).Facebookhas fullcontrolovertheseformatsandcanthereforespecifywhatconstitutes appropriateconduct,context,anddisclosure.ThisgivesFacebookaclear competitiveadvantageoverotherpublishersandplatformsthatrelyon standardadformats. Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 71
[Figure1]ExampleofaFacebookSponsoredStoryad(2011).Imagecredit:ChrisMessina. AvailablefromFlickr(CClicense).
Thevitalcontextherewastheshifttomobilemedia.Fromaround 2010onwards,thesmartphonechangedadvertising,andtherefore advertisingformats,inwaysthatamountedtoabifurcationofthe“inter- active”advertisingworldintomobileanddesktopdomains,eachwith specificcharacteristics,constraints,anddynamics—anddistinctpolitical economies.Mobilemeantmanythings:smallerscreensandtouch-based interfaces,dramaticallyrefinedlocationalservices,andanappeconomy thatbegantodisplacethecentralroleofthebrowserindesktopmedia (Burgess2012;SnickarsandVonderau2012).Mobileplatformsweremore controlledthandesktopenvironments,especiallyinthecaseofApple’siOS ecosystem.Usersspentmoretimeconnected.Thesmartphonewasaper- sonaldevice,designedwithsingleusersinmind,incontrasttothemulti- useraffordancesofdesktopsystems.
Allthiscreated,veryrapidly,wholenewrealmsofadvertisingopportunity and,atthesametime,anurgentneedtoreconsiderandreinventformats fromthegroundup.Thedisplayadformatsthatworkedonthedesktop webfailedonthephone.“Mobile[banner]adsareeasilyignored,”recalled oneindustryobserver, “andwhentheyaren’t,they’reaccidentallyclicked” (Bilton2014).Formatstailor-madeforsmartphones,however,werevery successful.Popundersbecamepointless;notificationsemerged.
Facebook’sresponsewastoevolveitssignatureadformatstoalignwith thesmartphoneuserexperience.“In-feed”mobileadsbecamethenew goldstandardbecausetheywereintegratedintotheflowofthenews feedandthereforedifficulttoavoid.TheSponsoredStoriesformat,which effectivelybroadcastauser’sLikestoalltheirfriends,wasparticularly 72 Format Matters
important:itrevealedtheextraordinarypotentialofin-feedformats,and theproblemstheyraised.Theformatwasphasedoutin2014,partlyasa resultofprivacyconcernsandarelatedUS$20millionclassactionlawsuit.
Facebookhasalsotrialedanumberofvideoadformatsovertheyears, includingshortGIFs,cinemagraphs,andvideotakeoverads,alldesigned forin-feedviewing.Clearly,Facebook’ssuccesshasbeenpremisedonthe continualinventionofnewadvertisingformatsthatintegratepaidads intothestreamofuser-to-usercommunicationsasdiscreetly(somewould saydeceptively)aspossible.AfurtheradvantageofFacebook’scustom formatsisthattheyaresomewhatmoredifficultforadblockerstodetect. Since2016,Facebookhasbeenclaimingitcanoutsmartdesktopadblockers becauseofthewayitembedsitsadsintheplatform,althoughAdblockPlus developershavealsoinventednewworkaroundsinresponse(Bosworth 2016;Tan2017).Theendresultisthefamiliar“whack-a-molegameofcon- stantlycreatingadformatstoblocktheblockers,onlytohavethemfigure outawork-around”(InnovationMedia2017).So,whilenoformatistotally impervioustoadblocking,customformatsmaybehardertoblockbecause oftheirdeepintegrationinto theplatform.
Astheseexamplessuggest,thepoliticaleconomyofformatshelpsusto understandwhyandhowtheinternetadvertisingeconomyhasevolvedin recentyearsintoa“duopoly”ofFacebookandGoogle,thetwocompanies thatnowcommandthevastmajorityofnewadvertisingexpenditure andwhosedominationofadvertisingandmediaissobitterlycontested. Controloverformatswasapreconditionforthismassiveconcentrationof industrypower.
Format Governance
ThestoryofGoogleandFacebook,andtheirmasteryofcustomadformats, remindsusofwhatisatstakeherecommercially.Bothcompanieshave investedenormousresourcesinstandardizing,scaling,andautomating theiradvertisinginfrastructure.Theynowofferend-to-endadvertising solutionsinwhichallelementsofthetransactionarecontrolledand monitoredin-platform.However,thesituationisdifferentinadvertising supplychainsthatrelyonstandarddisplayadformats,suchasthose shownonmostwebsitesandinapps.Thesesupplychainsremainhighly complex,volatile,andconflicted.Inthedisplayadvertisingecology,the processofstandardizationhasbeenonlypartiallysuccessful. Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 73
ThesetensionscanbeseenplainlyinthehistoryoftheIAB,theindus- try’sreluctantandineffectualwatchdog.Asexplainedearlier,theIAB wasfoundedin1996tolendsomeordertoanincreasinglydisorganized industry.Manyreaderswillrecallthatthemid1990sweretherough-and- readyyearsofbanneradvertising,whenbannerswereproliferatingacross thewebinawiderangeofsizes,shapes,andcolorschemes.By1996, therewereanestimated250differentbannersizesinuse(Collins1996).As RobertGehl(2014)notes,
Websitesvariedwildly;evenwiththestandards-settingbodythe W3C,the“browserwars”betweenMicrosoft’sInternetExplorerand Netscape’sNavigator,coupledwiththeinevitablegrowingpainsof anynewmedium,meantthatusersconfrontedasometimesbizarre mediascapeofsites“underconstruction,”deadlinks,andpop-upads. Acommonmetaphorofthe1990swasthattheWorldWideWebwas the“WildWildWest.”Inthisspace,interactionwasasopen-endedas manyotherhumanactivities;uncertainty,surprise,andanxietywere theorderoftheday.(99)
TheIAB’sfirstmissionwastodramaticallyreducethenumberofbanner adsizesfrom250downtoeight.Theorganizationissueda“Proposalfor VoluntaryModelBannerSizes”(IAB1996)inDecember1996whichdefined specsfortheeightmostcommonwebadvertisingbanners.Thesebecame thestandardIABunits,whichpublishersandadvertiserswereencouraged toadopt.Inlateryears,theIABwouldextenditsstandardizationagenda toincludevideoads,mobileads,andotherissueslikeprivacyandtracking (table2).ItwouldalsochangeitsnametotheInteractiveAdvertising Bureautoindicateitsnewlyenlargedfocus. 74 Format Matters
1996: FoundedasInternetAdvertisingBureau;setsbannersizestandards 1997: Establishesfirstinternationalchapters 1998: IssuesOnlineAudienceMeasurementGuidelines;definesthead “impression” 2000:IssuesIABPrivacyGuidelines 2002: IssuesUniversalAdPackageGuidelines 2004:IssuesPop-Up/UnderGuidelines 2007:OpensIABPublicPolicyOffice 2008:Issuesvideoadguidelinesandstandards 2011: ReleasesMobileRichMediaAdInterfaceDefinitions(MRAID)andGuiding PrinciplesofDigitalMeasurement 2012: Developsvideoadprotocols 2013: Developsvideostandards 2016: DevelopsLEAN(lightweight,encrypted,AdChoice-supported,noninvasive) principles;phasesoutsetadsizesinfavorofratios;deliststhepop-up
[Table2]InteractiveAdvertisingBureaukeymilestones
TheIABstandardsprocessformedthebasisforawiderrationalizationof internetadvertising(Gehl2014,100).Theclean-upoperationenabledthe growthofadnetworks,whichemergedaround1997andwhoseprimary functionwastosellbanneradvertisingacrossmultiplesites(whichwas onlyfeasibleatscaleforwebsitesthatadoptedIABstandardsizes).IAB standardswerethusintegraltotheautomationofadvertinggenerallyand theadvertisingarchitecturesthatwouldemergeinthesocialmediaplat- formsofthe2000s.Ineffect,asGehl(2014)suggests,theIAB“produced thestandardsnecessaryforeffectivesocialmediasurveillance”(94).This processof sizestandardizationwasrelativelyuncontroversialandthere- forerelativelyeffectiveinitsstatedobjective.Adiverseandunrulysetof formatsandcommercialpracticeswasrationalizedintosomethingmore uniform.However,otherIABcampaignshavebeennotablylesseffective, especiallythoserelatedtousabilityandprivacy.
Asanexample,considertheIAB’slargelyineffectualcampaignagainstpop- upads.Thepop-up—anadthatsuddenlyappearsasanewwindoweither infrontoftheuser’sbrowser,orevenbehindit(thepop-under)—beganto rivalthebannerastheinternet’sdefaultadformatduringthelate1990s. InitiallyappearingonsiteslikeTripod.com,pop-upswereawfulfortheuser experience.Overtime,keystakeholdersintheindustrybegantowonder whetherpop-upsmightbedamagingthereputationandintegrityofinter- netadvertisingasawhole.TheIAB—whosememberswereoftenreliant onrevenuefrompop-ups—tookalongtimetocomearoundtothisway ofthinking.Whileitissueda2004pop-upguidelinesdocumentrequiring Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 75 advertiserstoincludeclosebuttonsandfrequencycaps,itwasn’tuntil2016 thattheIABfinally“delisted”thepop-up,removingitfromitsPortfolioof approvedadformats.Bythistime,usershadtakenmattersintotheirown handsbyinstallingadblockers.Themajorbrowsers—Firefox,Chrome, InternetExplorer,Opera,Safari—hadalsointroducedpop-upblocker functions.
[Figure2]Thedreadedpop-upad.ImagebyRandomLiteratureCouncil.Availablefrom Flickr(CClicense).
TheIABisnowstartingtogovernbadformatsmoreproactively.Inrecent years,ithasissuedguidelinesrestrictingtheuseofforcedcountdownads, non-closableinterstitials,andtheolder-styleflashingads.Itisalsodevel- opingguidelinesandstandardsofpracticeonothercontentiousissues, suchasautoplayvideo,dataallowance,batteryuse,andtrackingscript withinadcodeandcookies.Throughtheseprocesses,theformatiscalled upontoperformakindoftechnicalgovernance:IABstandardsaspireto formalizeachaoticandopaqueindustrybyspecifyingacceptableand unacceptablepractices;tosmoothouttheindustry’sroughedges;and,in general,toprofessionalizewhatisstillafragmentedandconflictedsector ofthemediaindustriesthathashadrelativelylittleregardforusability, transparency,orprivacy.
Formats in the Age of Automation
Advertisinghaslongbeenattheforefrontofautomationinthemedia industries,andadformatshaveplayedacentralroleintheautomation process.WehavealreadyseenhowGooglecombinedanautomated auctionwitharelevancealgorithmtodeterminethepurchaseand placementofAdwordsintheearly2000s.Clearly,thesimple,text-based Adwords formatfacilitatedthedevelopmentofGoogle’ssystem,andits commercialsuccess.Adwordswasframedasadvertising“fortherestof 76 Format Matters
us,”toborrowtherhetoricofanearliereraofpersonalcomputing.Itwas designedforaburgeoninganddiverseweb,withthepromiseofexpanding marketsandlatentcommercialopportunity.Initsearlyphase,theservice wasmarketedwithaquestionandinvitationthatunderlinedthesystem’s speedandeaseofuse:“Haveacreditcardand5minutes?Getyouradon Googletoday”(Levy2011,86).
TheAdwordsformattookonthestripped-back,minimalaestheticof Google’soverallsearchdesign,settingadsalongside“organic”search resultsinawaythatofferedsomedifferentiationfromthem—inorderto meetGoogle’slegalandconsumerobligations—whilegivingthemconsis- tencywiththe“housestyle”ofGoogle’swebsite.Thequestionofwhether theformatenabledconsumerstodistinguishclearlybetweentheadsand actualsearchresultsremainscontentious(DalyandScardamaglia2017). LikeFacebookStoriesorTwitter’spromotedtweets,thepotentialvalue ofthecustomadformatliesatleastinpartintheimplicationthatthis particularcontenthasbeenproducedundertheauspicesofatrusted service(asearchengine,socialnetwork,ormicro-blog).Inanycase,the stabilityandsimplicityoftheAdwordsformatseemstohaveprovideda formofassuranceforbothwould-beadvertisersandconsumerswhileat thesametimesimplifyingtheintegrationofadsintoGoogle’swebsites. Asimple,standardizedformat,madepossiblebycomplex,large-scale automation,servedaesthetic,technical,andcommercialpurposes.
Real-timebiddingandautomatedplacementdidnotemergeinthewider advertisingmarketfordisplayadsuntilaround2010,heraldingtheeraof “programmaticadvertising,”ageneraltermforthelarge-scaleautomation ofbuyingandsellingadvertising.Adiversearrayofnewintermediaries appearedtomanagethecomplexinteractionsbetweenthesuppliersof advertisinginventoryandthemarketofmediabuyers:someincompetition witheachother,someplayingcomplementaryroles,andsomecontrolled bylargetechplatformsoradvertisingconglomerates.Adexchanges, supply-sideanddemand-sideplatforms(SSPs,DSPs),anddataman- agementplatforms(DMPs)emergedtocoordinateandcontroltransactions inwhatwasarapidlygrowingmarket,withthespectaculargrowthof mobilemedia,theappearanceofin-appadvertising,andastrongtrend towardvideo.Apreconditionofthisnewecosystem,asnotedabove, wasthestandardizationandmodernizationofformats,aprocessheavily promotedbytheIAB,withoutwhichautomatedbuyingandsellingwould notbepossible.Inthis system,adformatscompriseoneofarangeof“ad slotparameters”involvedinautomatedmarketcalculations,alongsidegeo- graphic,demographic,system,anduserinformation. Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 77
Iftheautomationofadvertisinghasdriventhestandardizationofformats, thecurrencyofalgorithmicallyvaluedimpressionshasalsoenablednew formsofmalpractice.Manyformsofadfraudbecomepossibleinasystem involvinganarrayofdifferentparties,andtheformatandplacementof adsisalsosubjecttomisrepresentation.Twotechniquesarenotable: “pixelstuffing”involvesresizingpaidadsto1x1pixelsize,renderingthem effectivelyinvisibleonthepage,while“adstacking,”anothertechnique, involvestheverticalstackingoflargenumbersofadsofthesameformat, sothatonlythetopfewmaybevisible.Therearenowsomanyinter- mediariesinvolvedinprogrammaticadplacementsthatitisoftendifficult topinpointthesourceofthefraud.Thesedeceptivepractices,andthe widerproblemofopacityandrevenueleakagewithinad-tech,aremajor challengesforpublishers.Forexample,The Guardian’sChiefDigitalOfficer HamishNicklin hasstatedthatupto70percentoftherevenuegenerated fromadplacementsonThe Guardian’swebsitesissiphonedofftoad-tech intermediaries.
Theproblemsofadfraudandrevenueleakageunderlinethedegreeto whichquestionsofadformatsarealsoquestionsofcontrol,governance, andpower acrosstheindustry.Studentsofmediahistoryarefamiliarwith debatesabout“formatwars,”suchasBetavs.VHS,whichemphasizethe headyandcontingentmixoftechnologicalchange,capitalinvestment, first-moveradvantage,andintellectualpropertycontrolthattendtodecide suchwars.Thereisalsoarichliteratureinthehistoryofscienceand technologythatemphasizesthesocialaswellastechnicalfactorsthathave determinedtheoutcomeofmanyotherstandardandformatwars,from railwaygaugestoelectrification(Hughes1983).Invariably,thesearestories ofpower,politics,andmoney.Thereisnovirtuousvictoryforthebestidea, thebestinvention.Outofthisprocess,newformatsandstandardsand codesemergeasphenomenathat“takeonasheenofontologywhenthey aremorepreciselytheproductofcontingency”(Sterne2012,298).
Thesehistoriesrevealthedifficultyofbuildingandmaintainingcon- sensusaroundformatsinanylargeindustry.Consensusisespecially challengingininternetadvertisingbecausethesupplychainhassomany participantswithwildlydivergentincentives.Publisherswanttoincrease theiradrevenue,platformswanttobuildandmonetizeauserbase,ad exchangesandmiddle-menwanttooptimizeauctionbidsandtakeat cu alongtheway,third-partyad-techsuppliersofferproprietarytweaksto theauctionformula,datamanagementplatformsselluserdataoverlays (oftenunethicallyobtained)toimproveadtargeting,adnetworksaimto buildthelargestpossibleinventorybase,andsoon.Togetherwiththat 78 Format Matters
systemiccomplexity,thereisalsoongoingchangeinthecompositionand interestsofthekeyactors.Publishers,forexample,rangefromlegacy mediabusinesseswithprintorbroadcastmarketstoentirelyweb-based mediafirmsandappcreatorsforsmartphonesortablets,allwithdifferent problemsandcompetitivepressures.
Thisgivessomesenseofhowdifficultitistogovernsuchacomplex system.Whilethesizeandshapeofadscan,andhasbeen,standardized, itismuchhardertopoliceothertransgressionsliketheuseofinvasive trackingscriptsinadcodethatslowdownpageloadtimes.Advertisers getawaywiththisbecausemostusersdonotrealizethattheadsare causingthedelay,orlatency;nordousersunderstandthattheadscript maybedrainingtheirphonebatteriesandcausingsluggishphoneper- formance.Thisprovidesanalibiforpoorlydesignedadcreativebecause theadvertiser’sincentivestoreduceadfilesizearenotinplace.Inthis context,the“end-to-end”offeringoftheplatformsstartstolookappealing toadvertisersaswellastoconsumers,whodespairoftheinefficiency, opacity,andpooruserexperienceinherentinwebadvertising.Inother words,thechaos ofweb-baseddisplayadvertisinganditsapparentimpos- sibilityofformalizationiscontributingtowhatmanyintheindustry—pub- lishers especially—see as a greater threat: the further empowerment of GoogleandFacebookattheexpenseoftheopenwebbusinessmodel (Hern2018;Orlowski2018).
Themaineffectofthetechnicalandformaltransformationsdescribed here—bothindustrialandcultural—hasbeentoopenhugenewadvertising marketsoverashorthistoricalperiod.Thesenewmarketshavestimulated thegrowthofextraordinarilypowerfuladvertisingplatforms,resultingin adegreeofconsolidationwithfewprecedentsinthepre-internetmedia environment.Inthecaseofadvertising,however,standardizationof adsizeshascreatedchaosaswellasconcentration.Standardizedand automatedadsfeednotonlyarethetitansoftheinternetbutalsocreate spacesforitsdemimonde:thebots,spammers,scammers,andskimmers whoevolveandadaptfastestinahugeandcomplexecosystem.Whenit comestoformats,theirexpertisecontinuestomatchthatofthelargest mediacompaniesontheplanet.
Acknowledgements ManythankstoSamKininmonthforresearchassistance,andtoNicCarahforexpert advice. Formats and Formalization in Internet Advertising 79
References
Bilton,Ricardo.2014.“PublishersInvestinHome-GrownMobileAdInnovations.”Digiday, May13,https://digiday.com/media/publishers-invest-mobile-ad-innovations/. Bosworth,Andrew.2016.“ANewWaytoControltheAdsYouSeeonFacebook,andan UpdateonAdBlocking.”Facebookpressrelease,August9,https://newsroom.fb.com/ news/2016/08/a-new-way-to-control-the-ads-you-see-on-facebook-and-an-update-on- ad-blocking/. Burgess,Jean.2012.“TheiPhoneMoment,theAppleBrand,andtheCreativeConsumer: From‘HackabilityandUsability’toCulturalGenerativity.”InStudying Mobile Media: Cul- tural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone,editedbyLarissaHjorth,Jean Burgess,andIngridRichardson,24–42.London:Routledge. Collins,Glenn.2006.“TradeGroupsProposeWebBannerGuidelines.”New York Times, December12,https://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/12/business/trade-groups-propose- web-banner-guidelines.html. Crain,Matthew.2013.“TheRevolutionWillBeCommercialized:Finance,PublicPolicy, andtheConstructionofInternetAdvertising.”PhDthesis,UniversityofIllinois, Urbana-Champaign. Daly,Angela,andAmandaScardamaglia.2017.“ProfilingtheAustralianGoogleConsumer: ImplicationsofSearchEnginePracticesforConsumerLawandPolicy.”Journal of Consumer Policy40(3):299–320. Gehl,Robert.2014.Reverse Engineering Social Media: Software, Culture, and Political Economy in New Media Capitalism.Temple,PA:TempleUniversityPress. Hern,Alex.2018.“CanWeReallyTrustGoogleasJudge,JuryandExecutionerofOnline Ads?”The Guardian,February15,https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/15/ google-chrome-adblocking-online-ads. Hughes,ThomasP.1983.Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore,MD:JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress. IAB.1996.“InternetAdvertisingBureauandCASIEIdentifyMostCommonlyUsedBanners ontheWeb.”InternetAdvertisingBureau,pressrelease,December 10,https://www.iab. com/news/voluntary-guidelines-banner-advertising-process-exploring-future-internet- advertising-forms-announced-industry-groups/. ———.2017.“IABNewStandardAdUnitPortfolio,July2017:Version1.1.”NewYork:Inter- activeAdvertisingBureau. InnovationMedia.2017.MagazinesReport2017–2018.https://innovation.media/magazines/ monetisation-how-the-heck-do-you-make-in-magazine-media-these-days. Levy,Steven.2011.In The Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives.NewYork: SimonandSchuster. Lobato,Ramon,andJulianThomas.2015.The Informal Media Economy.Cambridge:Polity Press. Lyon,Vicki.2016.“BacktotheBasics:AdCreativeFormatsHoldingBacktheFutureof OTTMonetization.”Ooyalawhitepaper,July21,http://www.ooyala.com/resources/ videomind-blog/back-basics-ad-creative-formats-holding-back-future-ott-monetization. Orlowski,Andrew.2018.“ChromeAdblockalypseWill‘AccelerateGoogle–Facebook Duopoly.’”The Register,February16,https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/02/16/ chrome_adblockalypse_ads_and_media_analysis/. Pidgeon,David.2016.“WhereDidtheMoneyGo?GuardianBuysItsOwnAdInventory.” Mediatel Newsline,October4,https://mediatel.co.uk/newsline/2016/10/04/ where-did-the-money-go-guardian-buys-its-own-ad-inventory. 80 Format Matters
Reina,Edoardo.2017.“MobileAdvertising:AnExplorationofInnovativeFormatsandthe AdoptionintheItalianMarket.”MScthesis.PolitecnicodiMilano. Rejón-Guardia,Francisco,andFranciscoJ.Martínez-López.2017.“AReviewofInternetand SocialNetworkAdvertisingFormats.”InDigital Advertising: Theory and Practice,editedby ShellyRodgersandEstherThorson,362–81.NewYork:Routledge. Sinclair,John.2012.Advertising, the Media and Globalisation: A World in Motion.London: Routledge. Snickars,Pelle,andPatrickVonderau,eds.2012.Moving Data: The iPhone and the Future of Media.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress. Spotify.2018.“SpotifyforBrands.”AccessedonMarch21,2019.https://spotifyforbrands. com/en-AU/ad-experiences/. Sterne,Jonathan.2012.MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham,NC:DukeUniversityPress. Tan,Emily.2017.“AdblockPlusCrackshowtoBlockFacebookAds.” Campaign,September27,https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/ adblock-plus-cracks-block-facebook-ads/1445772. Turow,Joseph.2011.The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress. Willens,Max.2016.“ThePromiseandPeriloftheCustomBannerAd.”Digiday,October28, https://digiday.com/media/promise-peril-custom-banner-ad/.