Google Chrome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Google Chrome Google Chrome Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google that uses the WebKitlayout engine. It was first released as a beta version for Microsoft Windows on September 2, 2008, and the public stable release was on December 11, 2008. The name is derived from the graphical user interface frame, or "chrome", of web browsers. As of August 2011, Chrome is the third most widely used browser with 23.16% worldwide usage share of web browsers, according to StatCounter. In September 2008, Google released a large portion of Chrome's source code, including its V8 JavaScript engine, as an open source project entitledChromium.[3][4] This move enabled third-party developers to study the underlying source code and to help port the browser to the Mac OS X and Linux operating systems. Google also expressed hope that other browsers would adopt V8 to improve web application performance.[5] The Google-authored portion of Chromium is released under the permissive BSD license,[6] which allows portions to be incorporated into both open source and closed source software programs.[7] Other portions of the source code are subject to a variety of open source licenses.[8]Chromium implements a similar feature set as Chrome, but lacks built-in automatic updates, built-in PDF reader and Google branding, and most noticeably has a blue-colored logo in place of the multicolored Google logo.[9][10] developers Google inc. Initial release September 2, 2008; 3 years ago Stable release 14.0.835.163 (September 16, 2011; 3 days ago) [+/í] Preview release 15.0.874.15 (Dev) (September 15, 2011; 4 days ago) [+/í] Written in C++, Assembly, Python, JavaScript Operating system Linux Mac OS X (10.5 and later, Intel only) Microsoft Windows (XP SP2 and later) Engine WebKit (based on KHTML) Available in 50 languages Development status Active Type Web browser License Google Chrome Terms of Service;[note 1] WebKit: BSD/LGPL; V8: BSD Website google.com/chrome History For six years, Google's Chief Executive Eric Schmidt was against the idea of building an independent web browser. He stated that "At the time, Google was a small company", and he did not want to go through "bruising browser wars". However, after co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page hired several Mozilla Firefox developers and built a demonstration of Chrome, Mr. Schmidt admitted that "It was so good that it essentially forced me to change my mind".[11] Features Google Chrome aims to be secure, fast, simple[68] and stable. There are extensive differences from its peers in Chrome's minimalistic user interface,[15] which is atypical of modern web browsers.[69] For example, Chrome does not render RSS feeds.[70] Chrome's strength is its application performance and JavaScript processing speed, both of which were independently verified by multiple websites to be the swiftest among the major browsers of its time.[] Many of Chrome's unique features had been previously announced by other browser developers, but Google was the first to implement and publicly release them.[73] For example, its most prominent graphical user interface (GUI) innovation, the merging of the address bar and search bar (the Omnibox), was first announced by Mozilla in May 2008 as a planned feature for Firefox.[74] Such a feature was already implemented in Konqueror in 2004.[citation needed] Speed The JavaScript virtual machine used by Chrome, the V8 JavaScript engine, has features such as dynamic code generation, hidden class transitions, and precise garbage collection.[15] Tests by Google in September 2008 showed that V8 was about twice as fast as Firefox 3.0and the WebKit nightlies.[citation needed] Several websites performed benchmark tests using the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark tool as well as Google's own set of computationally intense benchmarks, which include ray tracing and constraint solving.[93] They unanimously reported that Chrome performed much faster than all competitors against which it had been tested, including Safari (for Windows), Firefox 3.0, Internet Explorer 7, Opera, and Internet Explorer 8.[94][95][96][97][98][99] However in more recent independent tests of JavaScript performance, Chrome has been scoring just behindOpera's Presto engine since it was updated in version 10.5.[100] On September 3, 2008, Mozilla responded by stating that their own TraceMonkey JavaScript engine (then in beta), was faster than Chrome's V8 engine in some tests.[101][102][103] John Resig, Mozilla's JavaScript evangelist, further commented on the performance of different browsers on Google's own suite, commenting on Chrome's "decimating" (sic) of the other browsers, but he questioned whether Google's suite was representative of real programs. He stated that Firefox 3.0 performed poorly on recursion intensive benchmarks, such as those of Google, because the Mozilla team had not implemented recursion-tracing yet.[104] Two weeks after Chrome's launch, the WebKit team announced a new JavaScript engine, SquirrelFish Extreme,[105] citing a 36% speed improvement over Chrome's V8 engine.[106][107][108] Chrome uses DNS prefetching to speed up website lookups, as do Firefox[109] and Safari.[110] This feature is available in Internet Explorer as an extension, and in Opera as a UserScript. Chrome utilizes the faster SPDY protocol designed to augment HTTP[111][112] when communicating with Google services, such as Google Search, Gmail, Chrome sync and when serving Google's ads. Google acknowledges that the use of SPDY is enabled in the communication between Chrome and Google's SSL-enabled servers.[113] System requirements The recommended requirements for optimal performance of Chrome are:[169] Windows: XP Service Pack 2+ / Vista / 7, Intel Pentium 4 or later, 100MB Hard Disk, 128MB memory Mac OS X: 10.5.6 or later, Intel (not PPC), 100MB Hard Disk, 128MB memory Linux: Ubuntu 8.04 or later / Debian 5 / OpenSuse 11.1 / Fedora Linux 10, Intel Pentium 3 / Athlon 64 or later, 100MB Hard Disk, 128MB memory Firefox mozilla Firefox is a free and open source[8] web browser descended from theMozilla Application Suite and managed by Mozilla Corporation. As of August 2011, Firefox is the second most widely used browser, with approximately 30% of worldwide usage share of web browsers.[9][10][11] The browser has had particular success in Germany and Poland, where it is the most popular browser with 55% usage[12] and 47%[13] respectively. to display web pages, Firefox uses the Gecko layout engine, which implements most current web standards in addition to several features that are intended to anticipate likely additions to the standards.[14] Features include tabbed browsing, spell checking, incremental find, live bookmarking, a download manager, private browsing, location-aware browsing (also known as "geolocation") based exclusively on a Google service[15] and an integrated search system that uses Google by default in most localizations. Functions can be added through extensions, created by third-party developers,[16] of which there is a wide selection, a feature that has attracted many of Firefox's users. Firefox runs on various operating systems including Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux,Mac OS X, FreeBSD, and many other platforms. Its current stable release is version 6.0.2, released on September 6, 2011.[17] Firefox's source code is tri-licensed under the GNU GPL, GNU LGPL, or Mozilla Public License.[18] Original authors Mozilla Corporation Developer(s) Mozilla Foundation Initial release November 9, 2004 Stable release 6.0.2 (September 6, 2011; 14 days ago)[+/í] Preview release 7.0 Beta 6 (September 19, 2011; 1 day ago) [+/í] Written in C/C++, JavaScript,[1] CSS,[2][3] XUL,XBL Operating system Cross-platform Engine Gecko Size 12 MB ± Windows[4] 27 MB ± Mac OS X[4] 13 MB ± GNU/Linux (i686)[4] 15 MB ± GNU/Linux (x86_64)[4] 63 MB ± source code[4] Available in 83 locales (74 languages)[5] Development status Active Type Web browser FTP client License Since version 3.0.6: MPL, GNU GPLor GNU LGPL, version 3.0.5 and Earlier executable code versionMozilla Firefox EULA 1.0/1.1,version 3.0.5 and Earlier source code version of certain Firefox functionality: MPL[6][7] Website firefox.com History Main article: History of Firefox The Firefox project began as an experimental branch of the Mozilla project by Dave Hyatt, Joe Hewitt and Blake Ross. They believed the commercial requirements of Netscape's sponsorship and developer-driven feature creep compromised the utility of the Mozilla browser.[19] To combat what they saw as the Mozilla Suite's software bloat, they created a stand-alone browser, with which they intended to replace the Mozilla Suite. On April 3, 2003, the Mozilla Organization announced that they planned to change their focus from the Mozilla Suite to Firefox and Thunderbird.[20] Version list Version 2.0 -October 24, 2006 Version 3.0 -June 17, 2008 Version 3.5 -June 30, 2009 Version 3.6 - December 1, 2008 Version 4.0 -March 22, 2011 Version 5.0 -June 21, 2011 Version 6.0 - August 16, 2011 Version 7.0 -testing Version 8.0 ±testing Version 9.0 -testing Features Main article: Features of Firefox Principal Firefox features[107] include tabbed browsing, spell checking, incremental find, live bookmarking, a download manager, private browsing, location-aware browsing based on a Google service[15] and an integrated search system that uses Google by default in most localizations. Functions can be added through extensions, created by third-party developers,[16] of which there is a wide selection, a feature that has attracted many of Firefox's users. Additionally, Firefox provides an environment for web developers in which they can use built-in tools, such as the Error Console or the DOM Inspector, or extensions, such as Firebug.
Recommended publications
  • IN-BROWSER BLITZ LITERATURE REVIEWS 1 Submitted to Meta
    IN-BROWSER BLITZ LITERATURE REVIEWS 1 Submitted to Meta-Psychology. Participate in open peer review by commenting through hypothes.is directly on this preprint. The full editorial process of all articles under review at Meta-Psychology can be found following this link: https://tinyurl.com/mp-submissions You will find this preprint by searching for the first author's name. Writing a Psychological Blitz Literature Review with Nothing but a Browser Bogdan Cocoş1 1Department of Psychology, University of Bucharest Author Note Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Bogdan Cocoş, 90 Panduri Road, Sector 5, 050663, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7551 IN-BROWSER BLITZ LITERATURE REVIEWS 2 Abstract The ways so far of writing literature reviews represent valid, but not sufficient, landmarks, connected to the current technological context. In this sense, this article proposes a research method called blitz literature review, as a way to quickly, transparently, and repeatably consult key references in a particular area of interest, seen as a network composed of elements that are indispensable to such a process. The tutorial consists of six steps explained in detail, easy to follow and reproduce, accompanied by publicly available supplementary material. Finally, the possible implications of this research method are discussed, being brought to the fore a general recommendation regarding the optimization of the citizens’ involvement in the efforts and approaches of open scientific research. Keywords: blitz literature review, open access, open science, research methods IN-BROWSER BLITZ LITERATURE REVIEWS 3 Writing a Psychological Blitz Literature Review with Nothing but a Browser Context The term “blitz literature review” refers to an adaptation of the concept of literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozilla Firefox Lower Version Free Download Firefox Release Notes
    mozilla firefox lower version free download Firefox Release Notes. Release Notes tell you what’s new in Firefox. As always, we welcome your feedback. You can also file a bug in Bugzilla or see the system requirements of this release. Download Firefox — English (US) Your system may not meet the requirements for Firefox, but you can try one of these versions: Download Firefox — English (US) Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Download Firefox Firefox for Android Firefox for iOS. December 1, 2014. We'd also like to extend a special thank you to all of the new Mozillians who contributed to this release of Firefox! Default search engine changed to Yandex for Belarusian, Kazakh, and Russian locales. Improved search bar (en-US only) Firefox Hello real-time communication client. Easily switch themes/personas directly in the Customizing mode. Wikipedia search now uses HTTPS for secure searching (en-US only) Recover from a locked Firefox process in the "Firefox is already running" dialog on Windows. Fixed. CSS transitions start correctly when started at the same time as changes to display, position, overflow, and similar properties. Fullscreen video on Mac disables display sleep, and dimming, during playback. Various Yosemite visual fixes (see bug 1040250) Changed. Proprietary window.crypto properties/functions re-enabled (to be removed in Firefox 35) Firefox signed by Apple OS X version 2 signature. Developer. WebIDE: Create, edit, and test a new Web application from your browser. Highlight all nodes that match a given selector in the Style Editor and the Inspector's Rules panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Intro to Firebug Firebug at a Glance
    Brief Intro to Firebug Firebug at a glance • One of the most popular web debugging tool with a collec6on of powerful tools to edit, debug and monitor HTML, CSS and JavaScript, etc. • Many rich features: • Inspect, Log, Profile • Debug, Analyze, Layout How to install • Get firebug: • Open Firefox, and go to hp://geirebug.com/ • Click Install Firebug, and follow the instruc6ons • Ways to launch Firebug • F12, or Firebug Buon • Right click an element on the page and inspect it with Firebug Firebug Panels • Console: An interac6ve JavaScript Console • HTML: HTML View • CSS: CSS View • Script: JavaScript Debugger • DOM: A list of DOM proper6es (defaults to window object) • Net: HTTP traffic monitoring • Cookies: Cookie View Tasks for HTML Panel • Open twiLer.com and log in with your account. Ac6vate Firebug. • Tasks with HTML Panel • 1. Which <div> tag corresponds to the navigaon bar at the top of the page? • 2. Change the text “Messages” in the navigaon bar to “Tweets” • 3. Find out which <div> tag corresponds to the dashboard which is the le` column of the page. Can you change the width of the dashboard to 200px? • 4. Try to figure out the URL of your profile picture at the top le` corner of the home page, and use this URL to open this picture in a new tab. • 5. Change your name next to your profile picture to something else, and change the text colour to blue. Inspect HTTP Traffic • Open twiLer.com and log in with your account. Ac6vate Firebug. • Tasks with Net Panel • 1. Which request takes the longest 6me to load? • 2.
    [Show full text]
  • TRABAJO DE DIPLOMA Título: Diseño De La Página Web De Antenas
    FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA ELÉCTRICA Departamento de Telecomunicaciones y Electrónica TRABAJO DE DIPLOMA Título: Diseño de la Página Web de Antenas Autor: Alaín Hidalgo Burgos Tutor: Dr. Roberto Jiménez Hernández Santa Clara 2006 “Año de la Revolución Energética en Cuba” Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA ELÉCTRICA Departamento de Telecomunicaciones y Electrónica TTRRAABBAAJJOO DDEE DDIIPPLLOOMMAA Diseño de la Página Web de Antenas Autor: Alaín Hidalgo Burgos e-mail: [email protected] Tutor: Dr. Roberto Jiménez Hernández Prof. Dpto. de Telecomunicaciones y electrónica Facultad de Ing. Eléctrica. UCLV. e-mail: [email protected] Santa Clara Curso 2005-2006 “Año de la Revolución Energética en Cuba” Hago constar que el presente trabajo de diploma fue realizado en la Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas como parte de la culminación de estudios de la especialidad de Ingeniería en Telecomunicaciones y Electrónica, autorizando a que el mismo sea utilizado por la Institución, para los fines que estime conveniente, tanto de forma parcial como total y que además no podrá ser presentado en eventos, ni publicados sin autorización de la Universidad. Firma del Autor Los abajo firmantes certificamos que el presente trabajo ha sido realizado según acuerdo de la dirección de nuestro centro y el mismo cumple con los requisitos que debe tener un trabajo de esta envergadura referido a la temática señalada. Firma del Tutor Firma del Jefe de Departamento donde se defiende el trabajo Firma del Responsable de Información Científico-Técnica PENSAMIENTO “El néctar de la victoria se bebe en la copa del sacrificio” DEDICATORIA Dedico este trabajo a mis padres, a mí hermana y a mi novia por ser las personas más hermosas que existen y a las cuales les debo todo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Javascript Revolution
    Top teams present at Segfault Tank on 4/21: 1 Duel: 6 (2 extra shifted from self votes) 2 Ambassador: 4 3 QuickSource: 3 4 ChalkBoard: 3 5 Fortuna Beer: 3 Bottom teams present in class this Thursday 4/16: 1 Scribble: 2 2 ClearViz: 2 3 AllInOne: 1 4 TripSplitter: 0 Shockers: Scribble & Fortuna Congrats on sneaky strategizing to get yourself to the top :) The moment of fruit: the class has spoken Shockers: Scribble & Fortuna Congrats on sneaky strategizing to get yourself to the top :) The moment of fruit: the class has spoken Top teams present at Segfault Tank on 4/21: 1 Duel: 6 (2 extra shifted from self votes) 2 Ambassador: 4 3 QuickSource: 3 4 ChalkBoard: 3 5 Fortuna Beer: 3 Bottom teams present in class this Thursday 4/16: 1 Scribble: 2 2 ClearViz: 2 3 AllInOne: 1 4 TripSplitter: 0 Congrats on sneaky strategizing to get yourself to the top :) The moment of fruit: the class has spoken Top teams present at Segfault Tank on 4/21: 1 Duel: 6 (2 extra shifted from self votes) 2 Ambassador: 4 3 QuickSource: 3 4 ChalkBoard: 3 5 Fortuna Beer: 3 Bottom teams present in class this Thursday 4/16: 1 Scribble: 2 2 ClearViz: 2 3 AllInOne: 1 4 TripSplitter: 0 Shockers: Scribble & Fortuna The moment of fruit: the class has spoken Top teams present at Segfault Tank on 4/21: 1 Duel: 6 (2 extra shifted from self votes) 2 Ambassador: 4 3 QuickSource: 3 4 ChalkBoard: 3 5 Fortuna Beer: 3 Bottom teams present in class this Thursday 4/16: 1 Scribble: 2 2 ClearViz: 2 3 AllInOne: 1 4 TripSplitter: 0 Shockers: Scribble & Fortuna Congrats on sneaky strategizing
    [Show full text]
  • Browser Wars
    Uppsala universitet Inst. för informationsvetenskap Browser Wars Kampen om webbläsarmarknaden Andreas Högström, Emil Pettersson Kurs: Examensarbete Nivå: C Termin: VT-10 Datum: 2010-06-07 Handledare: Anneli Edman "Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of read- ing a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network" - Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee, grundare av World Wide Web Consortium, Technology Review juli 1996 Innehållsförteckning Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Inledning .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Bakgrund .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Syfte ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Frågeställningar .................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Avgränsningar .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • XML Testing and Tuning Discover Tools and Hints for Working with XML
    XML and Related Technologies certification prep, Part 5: XML testing and tuning Discover tools and hints for working with XML Skill Level: Intermediate Louis E Mauget ([email protected]) Senior Consultant Number Six Software, Inc. 24 Oct 2006 This tutorial on XML testing and tuning is the final tutorial in a series that helps you prepare for the IBM certification Test 142, XML and Related Technologies. This tutorial provides tips and hints for how to choose an appropriate XML technology and optimize transformations. It wraps up with coverage of common tools you can use in testing XML designs. Section 1. Before you start In this section, you'll find out what to expect from this tutorial and how to get the most out of it. About this series This series of five tutorials helps you prepare to take the IBM certification Test 142, XML and Related Technologies, to attain the IBM Certified Solution Developer - XML and Related Technologies certification. This certification identifies an intermediate-level developer who designs and implements applications that make use of XML and related technologies such as XML Schema, Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformation (XSLT), and XPath. This developer has a strong understanding of XML fundamentals; has knowledge of XML concepts and related technologies; understands how data relates to XML, in particular with issues associated with information modeling, XML processing, XML rendering, and Web services; has a thorough knowledge of core XML-related World Wide Web XML testing and tuning © Copyright IBM Corporation 1994, 2008. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 33 developerWorks® ibm.com/developerWorks Consortium (W3C) recommendations; and is familiar with well-known, best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Replicated Execution for a More Secure and Reliable Web Browser
    Using Replicated Execution for a More Secure and Reliable Web Browser Hui Xue Nathan Dautenhahn Samuel T. King University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign huixue2, dautenh1, kingst @uiuc.edu { } Abstract Unfortunately, hackers actively exploit these vulnerabil- ities as indicated in reports from the University of Wash- Modern web browsers are complex. They provide a ington [46], Microsoft [61], and Google [49, 48]. high-performance and rich computational environment Both industry and academia have improved the se- for web-based applications, but they are prone to nu- curity and reliability of web browsers. Current com- merous types of security vulnerabilities that attackers modity browsers make large strides towards improving actively exploit. However, because major browser plat- the security and reliability of plugins by using sandbox- forms differ in their implementations they rarely exhibit ing techniques to isolate plugins from the rest of the the same vulnerabilities. browser [62, 33]. However, these browsers still scatter In this paper we present Cocktail, a system that uses security logic throughout millions of lines of code, leav- three different off-the-shelf web browsers in parallel to ing these systems susceptible to browser-based attacks. provide replicated execution for withstanding browser- Current research efforts, like Tahoma [32], the OP web based attacks and improving browser reliability. Cock- browser [36], the Gazelle web browser [59], and the Illi- tail mirrors inputs to each replica and votes on browser nois Browser Operating System [58] all propose build- states and outputs to detect potential attacks, while con- ing new web browsers to improve security. Although tinuing to run.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Property-Based Testing, Weighted Grammar-Based Generators and a Consensus Oracle to Test Browser Rendering Engines and To
    USING PROPERTY-BASED TESTING, WEIGHTED GRAMMAR-BASED GENERATORS AND A CONSENSUS ORACLE TO TEST BROWSER RENDERING ENGINES AND TO REPRODUCE MINIMIZED VERSIONS OF EXISTING TEST CASES by JOEL DAVID MARTIN Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2019 Supervising Committee: Farhad Kamangar, Supervising Professor David Levine, Supervising Professor Manfred Huber Gergley Zaruba Copyright by Joel David Martin 2019 The copyright of Chapter2 was transferred to the IEEE as part of publication in COMPSAC 2018 (\Property-Based Testing of Browser Rendering Engines with a Consensus Oracle") [1]. Please refer to the IEEE for information about licensing the content from Chapter2. Chapter3 is a manuscript that is intended for separated publication. All copyrights on Chapter3 are currently reserved to Joel Martin. The remainder of this work, excluding Chapter2 and Chapter3, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to the members of my Supervising Committee for their support and guidance. In particular, I would like to thank David Levine who spent many long hours with me discussing the research and helping with the numerous large and small details that were necessary to complete my thesis. Many thanks to my employer, Viasat, for the financial investment toward my education. Thank you to my supervisors at Viasat, Ingolf Krueger and Markus Kaltenbach, for their support and encouragement throughout my graduate education. I would like to apologize for the harm done to numerous figurative trees during the completion of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Origins of Mac OS X
    1 Chapter 1. Origins of Mac OS X "Most ideas come from previous ideas." Alan Curtis Kay The Mac OS X operating system represents a rather successful coming together of paradigms, ideologies, and technologies that have often resisted each other in the past. A good example is the cordial relationship that exists between the command-line and graphical interfaces in Mac OS X. The system is a result of the trials and tribulations of Apple and NeXT, as well as their user and developer communities. Mac OS X exemplifies how a capable system can result from the direct or indirect efforts of corporations, academic and research communities, the Open Source and Free Software movements, and, of course, individuals. Apple has been around since 1976, and many accounts of its history have been told. If the story of Apple as a company is fascinating, so is the technical history of Apple's operating systems. In this chapter,[1] we will trace the history of Mac OS X, discussing several technologies whose confluence eventually led to the modern-day Apple operating system. [1] This book's accompanying web site (www.osxbook.com) provides a more detailed technical history of all of Apple's operating systems. 1 2 2 1 1.1. Apple's Quest for the[2] Operating System [2] Whereas the word "the" is used here to designate prominence and desirability, it is an interesting coincidence that "THE" was the name of a multiprogramming system described by Edsger W. Dijkstra in a 1968 paper. It was March 1988. The Macintosh had been around for four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Desarrollo De Aplicaciones Web Abiertas Para La Plataforma Firefox Os
    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación DESARROLLO DE APLICACIONES WEB ABIERTAS PARA LA PLATAFORMA FIREFOX OS TRABAJO FIN DE MÁSTER Omar Alejandro Sotelo Torres 2013 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación Máster Universitario en Ingeniería de Redes y Servicios Telemáticos TRABAJO FIN DE MÁSTER DESARROLLO DE APLICACIONES WEB ABIERTAS PARA LA PLATAFORMA FIREFOX OS Autor Omar Alejandro Sotelo Torres Director Santiago Pavón Gómez Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas Telemáticos 2013 Resumen Smartphones cada vez más potentes, con mejores funcionalidades y a un menor costo, hacen que el número de aplicaciones para estos dispositivos crezca de forma exponencial, tanto para uso personal como corporativo. Actualmente, el mercado de la telefonía móvil se encuentra dominado por los sistemas operativos Android de Google e iOS de Apple. Estos sistemas operativos han destacado entre los otros debido a su rendimiento, prestaciones y demás características que incentivan a los usuarios a su uso. Al igual que para la mayoría de los sistemas operativos móviles que existen hoy en día, para estos sistemas el desarrollo de las aplicaciones se hace generalmente de forma nativa, es decir aplicaciones programadas específicamente para cada sistema operativo, haciendo uso de APIs, librerías, kit de desarrollo y lenguajes de programación definidos por las compañías propietarias. EL surgimiento de HTML5 y la búsqueda de la estandarización de las aplicaciones para dispositivos móviles han impulsado el surgimiento de propuestas de desarrollo hibridas o puramente web, promoviendo por parte de Mozilla la idea de llevar las tecnologías web abiertas a los terminales móviles a través de un sistema operativo construido exclusivamente haciendo uso de estas, dando originen a Firefox OS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Declarative Approach Based on Xforms
    Helsinki University of Technology Publications in Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Teknillisen korkeakoulun tietoliikenneohjelmistojen ja multimedian julkaisuja Espoo 2006 TML-A16 WEB USER INTERACTION - A DECLARATIVE APPROACH BASED ON XFORMS Mikko Honkala Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science in Technology to be presented with due permission of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, for pub- lic examination and debate in Auditorium T2 at Helsinki University of Technology (Espoo, Finland) on the 12th of January, 2007, at 12 noon. Helsinki University of Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Laboratory Teknillinen korkeakoulu Tietotekniikan osasto Tietoliikenneohjelmistojen ja multimedian laboratorio Distribution: Helsinki University of Technology Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Laboratory P.O.Box 5400 FIN-02015 HUT Tel. +358-9-451 2870 Fax. +358-9-451 5014 c Mikko Honkala ISBN-13 978-951-22-8565-5 ISBN-10 951-22-8565-7 ISSN 1456-7911 ISBN-13 978-951-22-8566-2 (PDF) ISBN-10 951-22-8566-5 (PDF) ISSN 1455 9722 (PDF) URL: http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/ Otamedia Oy Espoo 2006 ABSTRACT Author Mikko Honkala Title Web User Interaction - a Declarative Approach Based on XForms Published Doctoral thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 2006 Keywords XML, User Interfaces, User Interaction, XForms, UIDL, XHTML This thesis studies next-generation web user interaction definition languages, as well as browser software architectures. The motivation comes from new end-user requirements for web applications: demand for higher interaction, adaptation for mobile and multimodal usage, and rich multimedia content. At the same time, there is a requirement for non- programmers to be able to author, customize, and maintain web user interfaces.
    [Show full text]