AGENDA NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING October 9-10, 1975 Delta Township Hall - Lansing, Michigan

THURSDAY, October 9, 1975 - 9:00 am - Delta Township Hall Staff Reports

THURSDAY, October 9, 1975 - 1:30 pm - Delta Township Hall I. PUBLIC APPEARANCES Mr. Louis Twardzik, Professor, Michigan State University - Underwater

Park Survey (presentation given by Tom Warner t Research Assistant) Mr. Kim Horrocks - Chemical Treatment of Prairie Creek, Ionia County Mr. Robert H. Allen, Assistant to the Vice President, Special Projects Planning, Presque Isle Corporation, Alpena - Proposed Administrative Rules -- Mine Reclamation Act II. DIRECTOR'S MATTERS III. ANNOUNCEMENTS IV. RECESS

FRIDAY, October 10, 1975 - 9:00 am - Delta Township Hall 1. OLD BUSINESS Approval of Minutes - August 14-15, 1975, Natural Resources Commi 55i on . Proposed Administrative Rules for Mine Reclamation Act-- Tentative Approval - LATE MEMO . 1-19 II. RESOLUTIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS III. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes - September 11-12, 1975, Natural Resources Commission Meeting 2. Administrative Rules to Establish a Relocation Appeal Procedure - Tentative Approval 20-24 3. WATERCRAFT CONTROLS a. Control of Watercraft on the Waters of Union Lake, Sherwood and Union Townships, Branch County - Rescission of Tentative Approval 25 b. Control of Watercraft on the Wate~s of the Detroit River~ Cities of Ecorse, Gibraltar, ( Trenton and Wyandotte, and Grosse 11e Township, Wayne County - Tentative Approval 26-29 c. Control of Watercraft on the Waters of Farewell e and Pine Hills Lakes, Hanover Township, Jackson County - Rescission of Tentative Approval 30 4. Haven Hill Lake, Oakland County - Fishing Closure 31 5. PARKS MEMORANDUMS a. Amendments to Existing Riding Stable Concession Leases 32 b. Lands Open to Hunting at Fisherman's Island State Park 33

6. LAND ~ATTERS (Map - Page 34) a. Park Land Acquisition - Craig Lake State Park 35-36 b. Park Land Acquisition and Boundary Dedication Pinckney Recreation Area 37-39 c. Park Land Acquisition - Negwegon State Park 40-41 d. Park Land Acquisition - Highland Recreation Area 42-43 e. Wildlife Land AcquiSition - Southern Michigan State Game Areas - Shiawassee River State Game Area 44-45 f. Wildlife Land Acquisition and Boundary Dedication - Maple River State Game Area - Wetland Areas 46-47 ( g. Dedication of Lincoln Lake Mini-Game Areas Kent County 48 e h. Easements for Department Installations 49 i. Public Use Conveyance for State-Owned land (Reverter Clause) 50 j. Municipal Conveyance of Undedicated State-Owned Land (Public Use Deeds for $1.00, plus Maintenance charges} 51 .. 52 k. Application for Drilling Permit 53-54 1. Mineral Permits - Gravel 55-56 m. Waterways Land Acquisition - East Arm of Grand Traverse Bay Access Site - LATE MEMO 61-62 n. Grand River Access Site - Jackson County - LATE MEMO 63-64 IV. DIRECTOR'S MATTERS V. ANNOUNCEMENTS The next meeting of the Natural Resources Commission will be November 6 and 7, 1975, at the 01ds Plaza Hotel in Lansing. VI. ADJOURNMENT e( ce

Chairman Johnson called the regular October meeting of the Comnission to order at 9:20 a.m. Commissioners present: Carl T. Johnson (Chairman), E. M. La1tala, Dean Pridgeon, Joan Wolfe, Charles Younglove

Staff present: Director Howard A. Tanner The meeting was turned over to Director Tanner to introduce staff reports as follows: Ralph Purdy, Deputy Director, Environmental Protection Branch, presented the Hat2r Resources Co~issiDn Report. (Copy on file ~ith Executive Assistant.) Purdy high­ lighted Michigan's views on the U.S. Corps of Engineers revised regulations for the disposal of dredged or fill material. He indicated that ~chig~~ was totally (e opposed to the expanded Corps' regulatory progra~ pointing out the program will be costly, duplicative of state efforts, inflaticnary, time consuming. and perplexing to the general public. Purdy reviewed Governor ~lilliken's letter of September ~, 1975, to Mr. Russell E. Train, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, oe~~ng application L~ accordance with Section 3l2(f)(3) of U.S. Pu~lic Law 92-500 to issue a regulation completely prohibiting the discharge from vessels of any se~.;age whether treared or not into the }Uchigan waters of Lakes }lichigan, Huron, Superior, Erie and St. Clair, all waterways connected thereto and all inland lakes. Purdy reported on the Oil and Hazardous Naterials progra;n stating that this pro­ gram created a great workload and some choices on priorities ~.;ould nave to be made. }~rtin Jannereth and Chuck Wolverton, Water Development Services Division, out­ lined the high risk erosion areas under the Shorelands Protection and !-1anagement Act 245, P.A. 1970. They outlined the steps taken in looking at these environ­ mental areas, indicating that meetings were held with the tOw~ships and property owners. Discussions included phase I and phase II under this Act.

Lee Jager, Chief, Air Pollution Control Division, presented the Air Pollution Control Division Report. (Copy on file with Executive Assistant.) Jager indicated that the AECC has scheduled a meeting on October 28, 1975, in Grand Haven to hear additional presentations by Consumers Power Compa;y and by other interested parties regarding a request from Consumers Power Company for change in emission limit for Unit No.2, J. H. Campbell plant. Jager indicated that the APCC approved a Permit to Operate for Molesworth Asphalt Company plant in St. Clair County, despite continuing neighborhood com­ plaints and obj.ections to this operation. The original Permit to Install was issued following a contested case hearing resulting frO(a citizens' intervention. Neither that hearing record nor subsequent field investigations substantiated the citizens' complaints. Jager i~ormed the Commission that Director Tanner issued an Executive Order to 62 October 9-10, 1975 Berlin and Farro, following their failure to cocply with a Consent Order requiring control of their liquid waste incinerator and following the Company's failure to submit an acceptable alternative program. Dr. Tanner's order stated the Company must cease operation of their incinerator, a~d rescinded their liquid waste haulers license and removed their certification as an acceptable disposal site for other liquid waste haulers. The Company obtained from the Genesee County Circuit Court a temporary restraining order. against the Department's enforcement of Dr. Tanner's order. At a court hearing the court ruled in favor of the Department and reinstated Dr. Tanner's order. The Company is now complying with Dr. Tanner's order pending negotiation of an acceptable compliance progr~. Commissioner Laitala asked what was happening to the liquid waste since this cease in operation. Jager responded that there were other operations instate and outs tate in agreement with the Air Pollution Control Commission. Commissioner Laitala asked if homes were there first or if the people moved there after the incinerator was in existence. Jager indicated that in most cases homes were there first, but this disposal technique is new.

Karl Hosford, Cnief, Office of Land Use, discussed the status of the Land Use legislation. H.B. 4234 proposes the establis~cent of a State Land Use Commission and the preparation of a state land use plan. This legislation is currently in the Urban Affairs Committee. Hosford indicated that he felt there would be sub­ stantial amendments to the Bill. He explained the composition of the 7-member State Land Use Commission and the 40-member Advisory Council. The Advisory Council will provide perspective views and input to the SLUe and advise on Commission activities. Hosford outlined the land use plan formulation, indicating that the SLUC shall utilize the land use plans of counties or regions unless such are in conflict with plan requirements and policy provisions. After a state land use plan is approved, the SLUC shall promulgate rules designating specific geographic areas as critical land areas conforming to the approved plan. The rules shall specify the boundaries of each designated area and shall set forth regulations which shall govern development in such area. A county, ounicipality, or the SLUe may grant a development permi"t for developments in critical land areas only if the proposed development meets certain criteria. Hosford discussed the public hearings, appeal process and penalties procedures. Commissioner Laitala inquired about input from different segments. Hosford indicated that the forest service people had input in this legislation, and the Michigan Farm Bureau was active in the development of this bill.

Harry Doehne, Office of Planning Services, presented a status report on the Natural Rivers Program. (Copy on file with Executive Assist~~t.) Doehne outlined the miles of designated mainstream and tributaries and the miles of active study rivers. The designated natural rivers are Jordan, Two-Hearted, Betsie, Rogue and White. Doehne briefly discussed the active study rivers. - Commissioner Laitala complimented Hr. Doehne on this heartening report. He also inquired about the Presque Isle River. Doehne indicated that there was a definite interest in this river, however, most of the land is federally owned and, therefore, offers a lot of protection. Commissioner Wolfe indicated that the Land Use Report and the Natural Rivers Report were great examples of working with and involving citizens and proving its effectiveness.

Dr. Wayne Tody, Chief, Fisheries DiviSion, presented a report on the present status and future management needs of Great Lakes commercial fisheries. Tody indicated that there were 162 licensed commercial"fishermen -- 52 selective gear and 110 gill netters. Tody explained the $1.5 million compensation plan for commercial fishermen. Tody reported on the quota program on chubs and herring. He outlined the status of lake trout, perch, menominee and whitefish in the Great Lakes. Tody indicated the Great Lakes rehabilitation program is going well and the fish are thriving. Commissioner Laitala asked if the Indians were extending their operations beyond their reservations on there own or with the assistance of white fishermen and what action should be taken on this. John Scott, Great Lakes Section, Fisheries Division, discussed the Indian fishing problem and cited two cases pending in the courts. Commissioner Laitala presented a news article to Mr. Scott regarding snagging salmon. (e NATURAL RESOL~CES CO}illISSION 63 Fred Kellow, Chief, Solid Waste Management Division, presented a status report on solid waste management. Under Act 87, P.A. 1965, the local health departments have been given responsibilities in the area of inspection. In a few areas this is carried on but predominantly the local units have not been provided with any increase in funding to support additional staff. The needed inspection is for­ saken for other program f~~ctions. There is a definite need to provide uniform ~urveill~nce t9 ass~re that all operations are maintained in a manner that will protect the environment. Planning at the local level is proceeding as anticipated. Kellow pointed out that it has been encouraging to see some local units work together to effectively solve their mutual problems. The department will be actively engaged in promoting plan implementation. Kellow indicated that 308 land disposal facilities, 7 incinerators, 58 refuse transfer stations and 3 processing plants are currently licensed, adding that there are still some unlicensable facilities in the northern counties. These facilities could legally be ordered closed but the drawback has been the lack of development of facilities to replace them. The expense of transportation is one of the deterrents to an effective system. People don't want to transport waste any distance for disposal. Kellow pointed out that the opposition to refuse handling facilities continues to be a signifi­ cant stumbling block to new landfills. Kellow informed the Commission that the Division will be expanding program activities in the area of resource recovery and volume reduction. One new position has been developed to W'ork directly on source and volume reduction as it relates to products and packaging. Another neW' staff positon will have direct responsi­ bility to promote resource recovery and to provide additional expertise in this area. The next meeting of the Resource Recovery Commission will be held November 19, 1975. There will be a two-hour meeting followed by a field trip of the Huron Valley Steel process in Belleville. Kellow invited the Natural Resources Commis­ sioners to accompany the Resource Recovery Corncissioners on this trip. The next few meetings of the ~~C will be deVOted to such things as review~ng (e the proposed solid waste management policy statement, the develop~ent of regula­ tions for Commission action, a review of pending legislation on solid W'aste -­ H.B. 4592 dealing with the certification of local health departments, increased bonding requirements and changes in the refuse transportation licenSing program. As the Resource Recovery Commissioners become aware of the provisions of both Act 87 and Act 366 and acquire knowledge of the conditions as they exist today, then program direction can be developed. Commissioner Younglove asked Mr. Kellow if incineration were being promoted. Kellow indicated that incineration was not promoted unless it incorporated heat recovery or steam generation. Commissioner Younglove also commented on the Solid Waste Management Policy Statement indicating that he felt this policy would-drive certain industries out of }lichigan. He indicated that we may make environmental gains but eliminate jobs.

Chairman Johnson recessed the meeting for lunch at 12:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 1:50 p.m.

(Commissioner Snell entered the meeting.)

Chairman Johnson reported to the Commission on the results of a special trip to Washington, D. C•• by Director Tanner and himself. (Copy on file with Execut.ive Assistant.)

The Director continued with staff reports:

Henry Webster, Chief, Forestry Division, presented a report on more effective state forest m~nagement. Dr. Webster indicated that there was a marked improve­ ment in the state forestry program, in both recreational uses and timber manage­ ment. Michigan has 3-3/4 million acres in state forests,which places Michigan first among alISO states in total acreage of its state forest. Dr. Webster feels the potential of Nichigan's forests is increasing rapidly for many dif­ ferent purposes. Political and educational institutions contribute to Michigan's potential f~ an outstanding state forestry program. Michigan has strong forestry 64 October 9-10, 1975

education and research in its universities. ~:i.chigan State University, Hichigan Technological University, and the University of Michigan offer programs in forestry and related resource management fields. }lore effective land use planning will result in better protection of forests, agricultural land, and other predominantly rural resources from premature conversion to urban purposes. Webster said improved recreation planning and environmental protection are necessary in areas where heavy use for a wide range of activities frequently exceeds carrying capacity of existing facilities. Such overuse threatens substantial deterioration of both facilities and the supporting forest resource base. Webster outlined the following steps for improved program and performance: improved forest resource management planning; more effective timber growth-utili­ zation and regional economic development; more effective recreation planning and environmental protection for state forests; improving organization to carry out this program. To make this happen the DNR intends to do so to the limit of its personnel and financial resources in the Forestry Division and related units. Webster indicated it is the firm intention of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to press forward on these important steps. The Forestry Division will take leadership in doing so, and will work in harmony with all interested individuals and groups in doing so. Commissioner Laitala commended Dr. Webster on his study and outlook. Commissioner Snell indicated that he was impressed by the forward thinking, new ideas and new approach of the Forestry Division and expressed the hope that Dr. Webster will keep the Commission posted.

Dr. Rupert Cutler of Michigan State University, extended an invitation to the Commission to hold the }!arch philosophical session Thursday, March 25, 1976. at the }BU Brody Auditorium, which is located across from the Kellogg Center. He indicated hopes for a truly impressive ~atural Resource Day. He felt this would be an excellent opportunity to get together for business and pleasure, as a banquet is proposed for that evening. The Commission ~ould be provided with space for the meeting and a" large audience of approximately 200 people.

Commissi0ner Pridgeon, suppcrted by Ca=issio::ler Wolfe, moved that the natural Resources CclllD1ission accept the invitatio.:1. 1:0 hold a philosophical session en Thursday, l-larch 25, 1975, at the Brody Ceup lex, Hichigan State University. The motion was carried unanimously by voice vote.

Public Appearances

Mr. Louis Twardzik, Professor, Michigan State University, introduced Thomas D. Warner, Director of Field Operations, and Dr. Donald F. Holecek, Faculty Project Supervisor, who presented a summary of findings for an underwater inventory of Lake Huron ship.~ecks located off Alpena County, Michigan. Mr. Warner gave a slide presentation indicating that this field survey was conducted June 15-29, 1975. The slides outlined the areas for the study in Alpena County and depicted individ­ ual wrecks. After a review of the findings of this survey, the research staff recommended that the Alpena area concentration of shipwrecks be saved from all but restricted salvage operations. Although the 1975 survey of shipwrecks can only be considered an initial inventory, a sufficient number of wrecks we~e located to warrant the establishment of tentative reserve boundaries. The report stated that in order for action to be taken to preserve this historic resource, a request must be made by the Alpena Cou~ty Commission to the }lichigan Natural Resources Commission to review the findings of the report. The task of deciding how the shipwrecks will be protected, if at all, will lie with the Michi­ gan Natural Resources Commission. This body is responsible for regulating the use of all state owned bottomlands in 1-lichigan. Warner indicated the shipwrecks in Thunder Bay represent a resource with a broad spectrum of historical signifi­ cance for the State of Hichigan. Warner advised that action be taken at an early time to insure time to consider what should be done in any underwater reserve. Commissioner Snell asked what authority the Natural Resources Commission had in this regard. Mr. l-!aslowski, Assistant Attorney General, commented on present limited legislation and the authority of the Commission. Commissio~~nell asked if the staff was intending to make a recommendation. NATURAL RESOURCES COM}lISSWcl 65

Mr. Hilstein, Chief, Bureau of Recreation, indicated that he had not had a chance to fully review this project. He indicated that the Department would be inter­ ested in the action of the Alpena County Coomission. Hr. Warner stated that the Alpena County Commission would provide letters to the Natural Resources Commission. Maslowski indicated that it was difficult to regulate these bottomlands as there ... a~e a lot.of .argumen~s from attorneys. It is difficult to enforce a statute where everything is not spelled out. Commissioner Snell asked if we should wait for more legislation. He indicated that even if the case is arguable, the Department should proceed if this is a unique resource and should try to protect it. George Bruso, Law Enforcement Division, stated that the legislation does give the Commission the authority to set aside areas as a reserve and Thunder Bay area could be set aside. Commissioner Johnson directed Director Tanner to discuss this further with staff. Maslowski added that if there were flagrant abuse, the Law Enforcement Division should be encouraged to bring civil action against these people. The Attorney General's office is prepared to bring civil action against anyone involved in this conduct.

Director Tanner introduced William Rustem, Special Assistant to the Governor.

Kim Horrocks appeared before the Commission presenting his concerns in the chemical treatment of Prairie Creek, Ionia County. Horrocks indicated concern about the environmental impact of stream poisoning. He also was concerned about what may happen as a result of a large increase of fishernen. Dr. Tody, Chief, Fisheries Division, indicated that this chemical treatn:.ent is to wipe out suckers and minnows and then the stream was stocked with bro~TI trout and steelhead. rody stated that there was a public meeting which was advertised in five newspapers to discuss the project. Commissioner Wolfe commented that where fish are planted, it creates certain problems. She felt there should be some kind of policy where the Commission accepts the responsibility for these decisions. Commissioner Snell felt there should be an overall plan for management of the Great Lakes fisheries and that the Commission should make some judgments. Com­ missioner Snell felt there was an obligation to review the im?act of a steelhead plant on every creek, including the impact of people pressure. Director Tanner indicated that this was not an ad hoc decision. Generally a recommendation comes from the field and is reviewed by the staff and then reviewed by the Commission. David Weaver, Fisheries Biologist, Region III, indicated that there were 150,000 steelhead planted in Prairie Creek. Weaver stated that most of the land along Prairie Creek was private. Weaver also felt there wouldn'~ be a large mass of people on Prairie Creek. Commissioner Younglove felt there were a lot of fish planted that the public couldn't get to. Chairman Johnson advised Nr. Horrocks that he would be glad to discuss this further with him after the meeting.

Robert H. Allen, Assistant to the Vice President, Special Projects Planning. Presque Isle Corporation, Alpena, discussed the proposed administrative rules on the Mine Reclamation Act. Allen advised that there ~ere two definitions in­ cluded in the draft of the administrative rules that needed clarification. The two definitions are: HI-lining area" and "Abandonment". Com:nissioner Wolfe asked that Allen give the Commission the Corporations's suggested wording for these definitions. Art Slaughter, Chief, Geological Survey DiviSion, stated that the definition of "mining area" was discussed after the public hearings, and the definition appears as it is stated in Act 92, P.A. 1970, as amended. Commissioner Snell indicated that he didn't see the problem in the definition of "abandonment" as he pointed out that on page 5 of the draft rules this had been clarified.

Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 5:09 p.m. 66 October 9-10, 1975 ce Friday, October 10, 1975 Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 9:20 a.m.

Commissioners present: Carl T. Johnson (Chairman), E. M. Laitala, Dean Pridgeon, Hilary F. Snell, Joan Wolfe, Charles Younglove

Staff present: Director Howard A. Tanner

Natural Resources Commission Minutes - August 1975

Commissioner Wolfe, supported by Coor.~ssioner Laitala, moved approval of the Minutes of the Natural Resources Co=ission for August 14-15, 1975. The moticn was carried ~~~~i~ously by voice vote.

Mine Reclamation Act - Administrative Rules

Director Tanner called attention to the agenda pointing out the suggested changes in the Drafc of the }tlne Reclamation Rules. Commissioner Snell stated that if the Commission wished to make any changes, they should be made before they go to the Attorney General and the Legislative Service Bureau. He expressed concerns with the revised wording, "unless otherwise authorized by the supervi.sor". Commissioner Snell felt if there were not any great urgency, the rules should be tabled another month. He felt that this language should be discussed with the Attorney General. Mr. Slaughter indicated that this ~ording was proposed as an alternative as a result of the Commission's discussion last month, but the wording had not been discussed with the Attorney General. Slaughter also indicated that the staff would rather not include these changes, but use the original proposal.

Commissioner Youn;love, s'.lpported by Conoissioner Lai tala, .coved. that the Proposed Administrative Rules for lUne Recl8.l!lation Act -- Tentative Approval, be tabled. The .cotion «as carried ~~animous:y by voice vote.

Commissioner Snell asked that the Presque Isle Corporation's comments be addressed in the proposed administrative rules for the }tlne Reclamation Act.

Oil and Gas Lease Sale

The following .cemorand~ was presented to the Commission: October 3, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Pursuant to authority granted by the Natural Resources Commission on June 13, 1975, oil and gas lease rights to 170,165.04 acres of state-owned lands and mineral rights were offered at a public auction sale on August 18 and 19. all in accordance with policies, zoning regulations and environmental safeguards previously adopted by the Commission. Bids totaling $511,146 were accepted for the oil and gas lease rights to 58,385.55 acres. Total bonus payments as prescribed by the rules and regulations have been received and will be credited to the General Fund or the Game and Fish Protection Fund as applicable under existing statutes. A detailed list showing the successful bidders, descriptions bid in, and amounts bid has been prepared from the official sale record on file in the Lands Division. Copies are available for review by the Commission and the State Administrative Board. Copies may also be obtained by other interested parties for the cost of reproduction. It is recommended that leasing of these state-owned mineral lands in the develop­ ment and nondevelopment categories under which they were offered be approved by the Natural Resources Commission under the authority of Act 280, P.A. 1909. as amended, and Act 17, P.A. 1929. as amended (pages 91 and 120, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition), subject to special restrictions for protection of privately owned surface interests as well as surface interests held by the U.S. Forest 5.sJ:vice. NATURAL RESOw~CES COXXISSIO~ 67 (e ROBERT G. WOOD Lands Division

I have analyzed and disucssed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TM"NER Director

Commissioner Wolfe, supported by Commissioner Snell, moved that the above memoran­ dum be approved and that the necessarl lease ~orms be prepared for signature, and further approvals be secured as re(J.uired by law. The notice contained in the August 5. 1975. memorandum previously ai::rpted by the Commission need not be incorporated in the lease to be entered into, the Commission being of the opinion that the language merely states applicable law. Finally. the Co~ission reiterates that its position is that each a~plication to the Supervisor of Wells for a permit to drill any of the leasei acreage of the August 1975 sale shall be most carefully scrutinized by staff to ascertain that any drilling to be done will cause minimal environmental d=age. The motion •• as carried unanimously by voice vote.

Commissioner Younglove wished the record to include that he was not able to be present at the September 11 and 12, 1975, Uatural Resources Commission meeting and that he objected vehemently to the action of the Commission in referring the Solid Waste Management Policy Statement to the new Resource Recovery Commission for review and comments before final adoption by the NRC.

Natural Resources Cow~ission Minutes - September 1975

Co=issioner Sr.ell, supported. by Commissioner ?ridgeon, moved approval of the Minutes of the ~iatura1 Resources Commission for Sept=ber 11 and 12, 1975. meeting. The motion was carried unanimously ~y voice vote.

Relocation Appeal ~rocedure

The following tiemorandum was presented to the Co=mission: September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: . It is recommended by the Administration, Engineering. and Lands Divisions ~hat the Commission, under the authority of Section 7, Act 227. P.A. 1972. give tenta­ tive approval of the proposed administrative rules for relocation appeals (copy on file with Executive Assistant).

ROBERT G. WOOD JOHN E. MILLER WILLIAM ROMSEK Lands Division Administration Division Engineering Division I have analyzed and discussed this reco=endation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TANNER Director"

Commissioner Laitala, supported by Commissio~er Wolfe, moved approval of the above memorandum. The motion was carried ur.~~imously by voice vote.

Ken Peterson, Flint Journal, asked if each state department must have its own . rules covering the relocation appeal procedure. Robert Wood, Chief, Lands Division, indicated that each state department promulgates these rules to protect citizens' rights and that these rules were patterned after Department of State Highways and Transportation rules.

\·e 68 October 9-10, 1975 Watercraft Contro1s

The following reco~endations were presented to the Co,~ssion: September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: It is"recommended that under' the provisions of Sec. 12-17, Act 303, P.A. 1967, as amended (pages 53 and 54, Laws Relating to Natural Resources. revision of 1972), the tentative approval of the Natural Resources Comnission of local watercraft controls for Union Lake, Sherwood and Union Townships, Branch County, be rescinded and that further action be taken only at the request of the local units of govern­ ment having jurisdiction. (Specific controls and background information on file with Executive Assistant.)

September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: It is recommended that local watercraft controls, authorized by Sec. 12-17, Act 303, P.A. 1967, as amended (pages 53 and 54, Laws Relating to Natural Resources, Revision of 1972), be tentatively approved on the waters of the Detroit River, Cities of Ecorse, Gibraltar, Trenton and '{yandotte, and Grosse lIe Township, Wayne County. (Specific recommendations and background informa­ tion on file with Executive Assistant.)

September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: It is recommended that under the provisions of Sec. 12-17, Act 303, P.A. 1967, as amended (pages 53 and 54, Laws Relating to ~atural Resources, Revision of 1972). the tentative approval of the Natural Resources Commission of local watercraft controls for Farewell and Pine Hills Lakes, Hanover TO·Nnship. Jackson County, be rescinded and that further action be taken only at the request of the local unit of government having jurisdiction. (Specific recommendations on file with Executive Assistant.) GEORGE H. D.'UIL Law Enforcement Division

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. T~~ER Director

Commissioner Snell, supported by Commissioner Younglove, moved approval of the above recommendations. The motion was carried un&,inously by voice vote.

Haven Hill Lake - Fishing Closure

The following memorandum was presented to the Co~ission:

Dr. Tanner pointed out that this item was a continuation of the closure since 1970 by Commission Order to protect muskellunge brood stock and to protect higher uses of the area (nature study and waterfo..:!. refuge). September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Haven Hill Lake, Oakland County, has been closed to all fishing since 1970 by Commission Order to protect muskellunge brood stock and to protect higher uses of the area (nature study and waterfowl refuge). The order of August 14, 1970, has expired (5 year limitation under Act 230 Commission Orders), and we recommend renewal of the order. It is, therefore, recommended by the Fisheries,Parks, and Law Enforcement Divisions, with concurrence of the Field, that the Natural Resources Commission adopt the order closing Haven Hill Lake" to fishing for a period of 5 years •

WAYNE H. TODY O. J. SCHERSCHLIGT GEORGi H. DAHL • Fisheries-Division Parks Division Law Enforcement Division NATURAL RESOURCES CO}IHISSION 69

The following oemorandums were presented to the Co~~ission: Riding Stable Concession leases September 17, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Continued increases in feed costs, veterinarian services, labor, and general stable upkeep for the three riding stable concessions operating on state park lands has led to concessioners asking for some consideration in a reduction in their commission. Normal businesses can usually pass increased operational costs on to the user by raising prices. However, it is the wish of the Parks Division to maintain prices for horseback riding from state-o~~ed stables at a reasonable level in order that as many persons as possible may enjoy this form of recreation. The present rental rates are $3.00 per hour on weekdays and $4.00 per hour on weekends and holidays, and it is intended that these will be held at that level. Brighton and Highland stables pay a commission of 15% of gross sales while Pontiac Lake pays 16%. To give these three excellent stable operators some degree of relief from costs which they cannot change, it is recommended under authority of Sec. 5, Act 218. P.A. 1919, as amended (page 190, Laws Relating to Natural Resources, revision of 1972), that the commission for all three be reduced 2% effective September I, 1975. O. J. SCHERSCHLIGT Parks Division

Commissioner Laitala commented on the above item. He felt the 2% reduction was minimal and suggested a 10% reduction. O. J. Scherschligt, Chief, Parks Division, explained to the Commission that this 2% figure would offset additional cost for feed for horses. He indicated that all stables, fences, water, etc., were provided by the Department. Scherschligt indicated that the concession operator (e made the determination of what the percentage figure should be. Fisherman's Island State Park - lands Open to Hunting September 17, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: The Commission, at its February 1975 meeting, approved the boundary description and dedication for Fisherman's Island State Park in Charlevoix County. Although the memorandum that was approved supported hunting opportunities, it did not specifically identify those areas of the state park open for hunting activities. It is recommended that until development or intensive recreation use preempts hunting activities, that all state-owned lands within the dedicated boundary of . Fisherman's Island State Park, Charlevoix County, with the exception of the Bells Bay Campground, shall be open to public hunting and trapping under authority of Act 286, P.A. 1929 (page 137, Laws Relating to Natural Resources, revision of 1972). O. J. SCHERSCHLIGT Parks Division

I have analyzed and discussed the above recommendations with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD.A. TAN~ER Director

Commissioner Snell, supported by COIT"~ssioner Yo~~glove, moved approval of the two above items. The motion was carried Q~animously by voice vote. 70 October 9-10, 1975 Tne following memor~~dums were presented to the Comcission: (All land descriptions and background information are on file with the Executive Assistant. )

Parks land Acquisition September 22. 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Craig Lake State Park - Baraga County 80.00 acres - $60.00 per acre - $4,800.00 (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: Escanaba Pulp Company, Escanaba, Michigan Reservations: None Appraisal: Land $4,800.00, improvements 0, timber 0; total $4,800.00 Relocation costs: None

Recommendation: Thac this tract be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands. 1966 edition), with payment to be made from State Park Revenue Bond Funds as appropriated for Various Parks for the 1970-1971 year.

September 22, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Pinckney Recreation Area - Washtenaw County (1) 10.00 acres $1,350.00 per acre - $13,500.00 (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: Robert H. Brooks, Detroit, ~lichigan Reservations: ~one Appraisal: Land $13,500.00, improvements 0, timber 0; total $13.500.00 Relocation costs: None (2) 39.12 acres - $908.23 per acre - $35,530.00 (optioned at 10 percent over appraisal) Vendor: Virginia C. ~~yers, Gregory, Michigan Reservations: Vendor reserves crops planted in 1975 Appraisal: Land $32,300.00, improvements 0, timber 0; total $32,300.00 Relocation costs: None (3) 61.00 acres - $775.00 per acre - $47,275.00 (optioned at 10.7 percent over appraisal) Vendor: William James Fahey, Chelsea, Michigan Reservations: None Appraisal: Land $42,700.00, improvements 0, timber 0; total $42,700.00 Relocation costs: None (4) 21.8 acres - $1,422.02 per ~cre - $31,000.00 (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: Robert Keiser, Gregory, ~tichigan Reservation: None Appraisal: Land $31,000.00, improvement 0, timber 0; total $31,000,00 Relocation costs: None

Recommendations: (1) That these tracts be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edi­ tion) with payments to be made from Public Recreation Bonds as appropriated by the Legislature for Park Land Acquisition in Pinckney Recreation Area as follows: Parcel (1) Year 1970-71; Parcel (2) Year 1970-71; Parcel (3) Year 1970-71; Parcel (4) Year 1971-72. (2) That the bounnary of Pinckney Recreation Area be extended to include parcel No.3, following completion of this purchase . .- NATURAL RESOURCES COill1ISSION 71

September 22, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Negwegon State Park - Alcona County

40.00 acres - $227.50 per acre - $9,100.00 (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: Alcona Township, Black River, }lichigan -Reservation",: None Appraisal: Land $9,100.00, timber O. improvements 0; total $9,100.00 Relocations costs: None

Recommendation: That this tract be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17. P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition), with payment to be made from Public Recreation Bonds as appropriated by the Legislature for Park Land Acquisition in Various Parks and Recreation Areas for the year 1971-'72.

September 22, 1975 Hemorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Highland Recreation Area - Oakland County

0.37 acre - Gift - Limited Purchase Vendor: Donald E. Bowen. Pontiac, Hichigan Stipulation: Reimbursement of or payment of taxes, not to exceed $1,000.00

Recommendation: That this purchase and gift offer be approved under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17. P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition), with payment to be made from Public Recreation Bonds as appropriated by the Legislature for Highland Recreation Area for the year 1970-71.

ROBERT G. WOOD O. J. SCHERSCHLIGT Lands Division Parks Division

I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TA1~ER Director

Wildlife Land Acquisition September 22, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Shiawassee River State Game Area - Saginaw County

10 City Lots - $3,500.00 per lot - $35,000.00 (optioned at 5.7 percent over appraisal) Vendor: Cecil M. Szepanski, St. Charles, Michigan Appraisal: Land $33,000.00, timber 0, i~rove~ents 0; total $33,000.00 Relocation costs: None

Recommendation: The tract be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition), with payment to be made from the Public Recreation Bond Funds as appropriated by the Legislature for the year 1973-74 for Southern Michigan Game Lands, Gratiot-Saginaw State Game Areas. -- 72 October 9-10, 1975 September 22, 1975 ~~morandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Maple River State Game Area - Wetland Areas - Gratiot County

20.00 acres - $577.50 per acre - $11,550.00 (optioned at 5 percent over appraisal) Vendor: John Fabus, Ashley, }lichigan Reservations: (1) Oil and Gas reservation for a 10-year period from date of deed; (2) Lessor's interest in a 10-year Oil and Gas lease dated October 29. 1970; (3) Use of premises for 2 years after date of closing, or to December 1, 1976, unless vendor is notified in writing prior to December 31, 1975. of in­ tention to take possession as of that date for purpose of use in the Maple River Drainage District program; (4) Right to maintain a tile main which extends across the ~1' corner of the property for the benefit of his adjoining land. Appraisal: Land $11,000.00, timber 0, improvements 0; total $11,000.00 Relocation costs: None

Recommendations: (1) The tract be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition), with payment to be made from the Public Recreation Bond Funds as appropriated by the Legislature for Southern Michigan - Wetland Areas, Maple River State Game Area for the year 1970-71. (2) The project boundary be extended after purchase to include the described land.

ROBERT G. WOOD DAVID H. JE11(INS Lands Division Wildlife Division

I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOW~~ A. T~~ER Director

Dedication September 22, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Dedication of Lincoln Lake Mini-Game Area, Kent County - 0.37 acres

The island in Lincoln Lake was surveyed by the United States of America and conveyed to the State in 1961. It has not been under formal jurisdiction since conveya~ce. Department field review of the island indicates it is used locally by wildfowl hunters and provides habitat for nesting of ducks.

Recommendation: It is recommended that this island be dedicated for public use under authority of Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 90, Laws Relating to State Lands. 1966 edition), to be known as Lincoln Lake ~lini-Game Area and administered for wildlife habitat.

ROBERT G. WOOD DAVID H. JENKINS Lands Division Wildlife Division

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWAP~ A. Tfu~ER Director NATURAL RESOURCES CO:'IMISSION 73

Easements September 17, 1975 Hemorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Instruments as indicated below have been secured from the owners of the described lands (copy of complete descriptions on file with Executive Assistant) for the .purposes. indi.c,ated •. The division administering the State lands for which these rights are needed has approved the proposed acquisition. It is -hereby recommended that these instruments be approved for acceptance under authority of Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition).

Instrument: Easement E-1507 Grantor: The Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company and Superior Realty Company. Ishpeming, Michigan Purpose: Cross-country skiing and hiking trail - Luce County Consideration: $25.00 Term: So long 8.S used or until terminated by grantor

Instrument: Easement E-1508 Grantor: Kimberly Clark Corporation, Norway, Michigan Purpose: Access road to state land in }lichigamme State Forest - Marquette County Consideration: $1.00 Term: So long as used ROBERT G. WOOD Lands Division

I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. T~~ER Director

Conveyance of Land September 24, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Application, resolution and remittance have been received from the governmental unit listed below for public use conveyance of state land to be used for public purposes. It has been determined that the land applied for could be conveyed in accordance with the authority provided by Act 223. P.A. 1909, as amended (page 75, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition). This conveyance will be made with the stipulation that when the property is no longer used for school purposes, title will revert to the State. When the bonds were sold for construction of the school, the bonding company specified th~t fee title, including all mineral rights, rights of ingress and egress and aboriginal antiquities were needed. The waiver of these rights has been approved by the Geological Survey Division. Rapid River Public Schools - Delta County - 121.29 acres (Description on file with Executive Assistant.) A parcel of land located two miles east of Rapid River, with county road access off US-2. Desired by the school district for construction of a combination elementary, junior and senior high school, playground area and accessory uses.

HENRY H. WEBSTER ROBERT G. WOOD Forestry Division Lands Division I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TANNER Director

September 22. 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Applications, resolutions, and remittances have been filed by the governmental units as listed below for conveyance of State-owned lands for public use as provided-for under the statutes. It has been determined that the properties 74 October 9-10, 1975

applied for are not needed in connection with any departmental land use program. Approval is recommended with title to be conveyed in accorcance with authority provided by Act 223, P.A. 1909, as amended (page 75, Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition). All mineral rights. rights of ingress and egress, and aboriginal antiquities will be waived. A stipulation will be made in the deed to the effect that if the property is sold, all sale proceeds in excess of actual expense shall be prorated by such municipality ~o all governmental units with a tax interest. (Copy of descriptions on file with Executive Assistant.)

Village of Laurium - Houghton County Two 50- by 94-foot lots on Pewabic Street in the Village on which is located a three-story stucco and wood shingle frame house in very poor condition. Desired by the village for the purpose of removing the condemned house and eventual resale of the lots to adjoining owner.

City of Detroit - Wayne County Sixteen various size lots and parcels scattered throughout the City, located in blighted parts of the City. Desired by the City for public improvements, resale to adjoining property o~~ers, and to continue their program of cooperation with neighborhood organizations in upgrading these areas.

City of Garden City - Wayne County One 142- by l48-foot lot on Pardo Avenue in the City. Desired by the City for eventual resale to adjoining owner.

City of Melvindale - Way~e County Seven various size lots and parcels scattered throughout the City, two on which are located hazardous buildings. Desired by the City for the purpose of removing the building, utilizing soce lots for mini parks and resale to adjoining owners. ROBERT G. WOOD Lands Division \.e ". I have analyzed and discussed these recommendations with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. Tru\~ER Director

Application for Drilling Permit Sept~ber 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: Shell Oil Company and Whitney Oil and Gas Corporation have applied for a permit to drill a directional well to be known as the State Springdale 1-32 from a surface location described as the NE~ of S~ of NE~, Section 32, T 24 N, R 14 W, Springdale Township, }~nistee County, to a bottom hole location described as the SE~ of NE% of N~ of said Section 32. The drilling unit will be comprised of the ~ of N~ of Section 32 which is in compliance with the existing spacing order for wells drilled in that area. We are informed that the most desirable drill site is in the S~ of N~ of ~ of Section 32, but this location was not approved by Department field personnel for the reason that it falls within a cedar swamp~ and the alternate drill site as identified above was approved by the Department's field representative as it was considered the best location available within the drilling unit. The drill pad will be diked in order to prevent any possible drainage toward the swamp. The location has the approval of the Regional Manager. The environmental impact assessment indicates the proposed drill site is located on level, dry ground approximately 200 feet south and east of the swamp, in a mostly open area. Ground cover consists of poplar two to six inches in diameter and scattered oak. Access is proposed from the north by way of an existing two­ track trail road. No special species of wildlife are known to exist nearby and the test well should have a minimal effect on the ecological systems of the area. Special requirements relating to preparation and restoration of the drill site as specified by the Department will be met. The applicant indicates the location will re~re a surface area of approximately 300 by 300 fee: and if an oil well NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION 75

is obtained the production will be moved to a proposed central facility approxi­ mately three-quarters of a mile to the northeast. If gas production is obtained an additional one acre would be required for facility installation. If a dry hole. the hole will be immediately plugged in accordance with Department requirements. In any event, we are advised the surface resources will not be irreversibly com­ mitted, and drilling and producing operations will not cause any major change .in the environment or the existing ecological systems of the area. '. . The proposed 'bottom hole location is part of State Oil and Gas Lease No •. 10,864 issued to Whitney Oil and Gas Corporation on September 15, 1972. This is a so­ called "development" lease which does not contain any special restrictions as to drilling or development. The proposed surface location is part of State Oil and Gas Lease No. N-ll.052 issued to Shell Oil Company on September 15, 1972, and contains the following restriction adopted by the Natural Resources Commission in December of 1970. the inclusion of this restriction having been recommended by field personnel because Lemon Creek crosses that forty:

All other provisions of this lease notwithstanding, it is understood that no drilling or development work shall be conducted on the surface of the land described in this lease without the specific authorization of the Natural Resources Commission, and said Commission will not consider granting such authorization unless production on adjacent land creates the probability of drainage of oil or gas from said state land. Even though there may be a probability of drainage. the Commission may in its discretion deny authorization to drill. Drilling, if authorized, shall be limited to the number of wells necessary to prevent drainage from said state land as determined by the Supervisor of Wells. No operations shall be conducted until written instructions for the proper protection of any and all natural resource interests and/or surface values are issued by the Director of the Department of Natural Resources.

It is the consensus of the Lands and Geological Survey Divisions that the cir­ cumstances relating to this application warrant an exception to this policy. and it is therefore recommended that the Commission authorize the granting of a drilling permit for the desired location to the applicants and for the well as identified above.

ROBERT G. WOOD ARTHUR E. SLAUGHTER Lands Division Geological Survey Division

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TANNER Director

Mineral Permits - Gravel September 23, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission: All of the mineral permit applications (copy of list on file with Executive Assistant) have been reviewed and approved under existing policies and procedures, and involve renewals or continuation of operations in eXisting pits. It is therefore recommended that the Forestry Division be granted authorization to issue the permits as designated in accordance with the provisions of Act 17. P.A. 1921, as amended (page 90. Laws Relating to State Lands, 1966 edition). Such permits must also be approved by the State Administrative Board prior to issuance, and the State Administrative Board will consider such contracts only if they have had the prior approval of the Natural Resources Commission.

HENRY H. WEBSTER ARTHUR E. SLAUGHTER ROBERT G. WOOD Forestry Division Geological Survey Division Lands Division

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TANNER Director 76 October 9-10, 1975 Waterways Land Acquisition

Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

East Arm of Grand Traverse Bay Access Site - Grand Traverse County

1.91 acres - $52,670.15 per acre - $100,600.00 - 347.05 feet of water frontage - $289.87 per front foot (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: Jerry C. Bartosek. Traverse City, Michigan Appraisal: Land and water $100,600.00, improvements 0; total $100,600.00 Relocation costs: $500.00 maximum

It is recommended that this tract be approved for purchase under authority of 'Sec. 4, Act 320, P.A. 1947, as amended (281.501 }lichigan Compiled Laws) and Sec. 3. Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands. 1966 edition), with pa)~ent to be made from the Capital Outlay Account appropria­ tion for land acquisition provided for in the Waterways Fund, including the 1975-1976 line item account. September 22, 1975 Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission:

Grand River Access Site - Jackson County

2.50 acres - $2,400.00 per acre - $6,000.00 580 feet of water frontage - $10.34 per front foot (optioned at appraisal) Vendor: William Mellon, Puryear, Tennessee Appraisal: Land and water $6,000.00, improvements 0, total $6,000.00 Stipulation: Provided that if title examination shows deed or other restrictive encumbrance which may prevent the use of said premises for the pUr?0se of public access, the terms of option agreement may be declared void by the acquiring agency.

Recommendation: It is recommended that this tract be approved for purchase under authority of Sec. 4, Act 320, P.A. 1947, as amended (281.50~}lichigan Compiled Laws), and Sec. 3, Act 17, P.A. 1921, as amended (page 92, Laws Relating to State Lands. 1966 edition), with payment to be made from the 1975-1976 Capital Outlay Account appropriation for land acquisition provided for in the Waterways fund.

ROBERT G. WOOD KEITH WILSON Lands Division Waterways Division

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with the Bureau Chiefs and staff and we concur. HOWARD A. TA.~~ER Director

It was moved by Commissioner Laitala, supported by Commissioner Wolfe, that the preceding recommendations be approved.

Commissioner Wolfe asked if there were any diffe~ences of opinion among staff on any of these land matters. Chairman Johnson asked Director Tanner if any of these matters were of a con­ troversial nature. Keith Wilson, Chief, Waterways Division, discussed the Waterways Land Acquisition - East Arm of Grand Traverse Bay Access Site, which may become a controversial matter. Commissioner Laitala commented on Park Land Acquisition - Negwegon State Park. He also commented on the Wildlife Land Acquisition - Shiawassee River State Game Area, questioning the cost of 10 city lots for $35,000. Dr. Jenkins, Chief, Wildlife Division, stated this was being purchased for a parking area. Commissioner Snell asked if there was material in the files reflecting any cor­ respondence or action by a Commissioner. He was assured that there was no involvement by a Commissioner in any of these land matters. e1 The mot4en was carried unanimously by voice vote. '.

NATURAL RESOURCES CO}lliISSION 77 Director's Matters Director Tanner asked Ralph Purdy to discuss the various attempts to amend Michigan's Environmental Protection Act. There is a Resolution by Representative Tom And~rson which may be introduced in the Fall Session of the Legislature. It . cites the gen~ral public and industry unrest of the complicated-procedures that must be followed in receiving permits from the state. The Resolution will call for a committee of the Legislature which will review sta.tutes and administrative procedures and rules that have been established under the statute. Purdy indicated that there were three commissions involved in the issuance of certain permits. If the resolution is accepted, a committee will determine what action might be necessary on the part of the Legislature or the Department to streamline the procedures with a minim\~ delay. Mr. Purdy also discussed the mini steel plant proposed to be established in the City of Muskegon by the North Star Steel Company.

Commissioner Laitala brought up the subject of the Ionia Recreation Area field trial site. Commissioner Wolfe asked to hear the pros and cons of this project. The Law Enforcement, Parks and Wildlife Divisions are involved in this matter. Mr. Harris assured the Commission that the staff is in agreement on this project. Commissioner Wolfe requested more information on this plan. Dr. Jenkins indicated that when the plan is ready it will be brought before the Commission.

Commissioner Snell asked where the Departl!l.ent and the Commission stand on the issues before the Oil Spill Review Committee. Commissioner Johnson is a member of the Committee and Bill Turney was appointed Chairman. Commissioner Johnson directed Dr. Tanner to contact Mr. Turney regarding the Oil Spill Review Committee and report to the Commission at the November meeting.

It was announced that the next meeting of the Natural Resources Commission will be held at the Olds Plaza Hotel on November 6 and 7.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m.