Geological History of Glacial Lake Algonquin and the Upper Great Lakes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geological History of Glacial Lake Algonquin and the Upper Great Lakes Cover. Main Algonquin level of Lake Michigan confluent with the Orillia (?) level of the Lake Huron basin (11 ,200 to 11,000 yr B.P.) . Geological History of Glacial Lake Algonquin and the Upper Great Lakes By CURTIS E. LARSEN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1801 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging In Publication Data Larsen, Curtis E. Geological history of glacial Lake Algonquin and the Upper Great Lakes. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1801) Bibliography: p. 1. Algonquin, Lake. 2. Glacial epoch-Great Lakes. I. Title. II. Series: Geological Survey bulletin ; 1801. QE75.B9 no. 1801 557.3 s 87-600256 [QE698] [551.7'92'0977] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Previous research 3 Lake Algonquin and its outlets 3 Evolution of the hinge line model 4 Relative vertical movement beyond the hinge line 7 Exponential uplift functions and an uplift model for Holocene events in the upper Great Lakes 11 Evidence for low Lake Michigan and Lake Huron levels 14 The Chippewa and Stanley low levels 14 The Main Algonquin low level 16 Overflow from glacial Lake Agassiz 19 The North Bay outlets 19 Reconstructing former water planes 20 A chronology of Lake Michigan and Lake Huron levels 23 Main Algonquin of Huron (MAH) 24 Main Algonquin of Michigan (MAM) 24 The Post-Algonquin lakes 24 The Chippewa and Stanley low levels 24 Pre-Nipissing transgression 25 Nipissing and Algoma Great Lakes 26 Conclusion 26 References 32 Appendix 36 FIGURES 1. Map showing Main Lake Algonquin draining southward through the Chicago and Port Huron outlets 2 2. Map showing position of the Algonquin hinge line 3 3. Relationship of the Main Algonquin and post-Algonquin shorelines of the northern Lake Michigan and Lake Huron basins interpreted on the basis of Goldthwait's hinge-line model 6 4. Model of Goldthwait's hinge-line concept for a southward-draining basin 8 5. Schematic model of shoreline positions in an uplifting basin 9 6. Sketch showing the scenario advocated in this paper, which Goldthwait failed to consider-a case of multiple northern outlets 10 7. Map showing measured historic vertical movement, contoured as uplift in feet per century, on the basis of lake-level gauge records 11 8. Historic uplift rates plotted along the east shore of Lake Michigan 12 9. Calculated Main Algonquin and post-Algonquin water planes plotted normal to isobases of historic uplift along the east shore of Lake Michigan 15 10. Diagram showing dating of the Lake Michigan Formation (Lineback and others, 1979) on the basis of the revised glacial geology of the Lake Superior basin 17 Contents Ill 11. Sketch of probable attitude of late-glacial red glaciolacustrine clays of the Lake Michigan basin 18 12. Calculated late Chippewa water plane at about 8,000 yr B.P. 21 13. Algonquin shoreline data of Lake Huron projected onto the Lake Michigan normal plane 22 14. Decreasing slope coefficients of postglacial water planes following the establishment of the North Bay outlet 23 15. Map showing Calumet-level Lake Chicago and Early Lake Algonquin 26 16. Map showing Calumet-level Lake Chicago and the Main Algonquin level of Lake Huron (11,600 to 11,300 yr B.P.) 27 17. Map showing Main Algonquin level of Lake Michigan confluent with the Orillia(?) level of the Lake Huron basin (11,200 to 11,000 yr B.P.) 28 18. Map showing Chippewa and Stanley low levels (9,900 yr B.P.) 29 19. Map showing pre-Nipissing transgression (about 8,000 yr B.P.) 30 20. Map showing the late Nipissing and Algoma Great Lakes 31 TABLES 1. Summary of Leverett and Taylors Great Lakes chronology 5 2. Comparison of Leverett and Taylors Great Lakes chronology with current interpretations controlled by 14C dating 6 3. Altitudes of raised shoreline features of the Lake Michigan and Lake Huron basins 13 4. Preliminary chronology for the Lake Michigan and Lake Huron basins 25 IV Contents Geological History of Glacial Lake Algonquin and the Upper Great Lakes By Curtis E. Larsen Abstract Lake-level gauge records show modern tilting of the who named it and noted that it had been differentially entire Great Lakes basin at rates ranging from 0.53 m/cen­ uplifted. Subsequent work by Taylor (1894), Goldthwait tury in the north to 0.08 m/century in the south. This pat­ (1906, 1907, 1908, 1910a,b), and Leverett and Taylor tern of historic deformation is used in this study as a (1915) defined the highest or upper Algonquin shoreline control to describe the upper or Main Algonquin shoreline. in the Lake Michigan basin. The shoreline features of this Regression analyses calculated on the uplifted Algonquin former lake had been deformed from an area of minimum beach features show them to descend exponentially with distance to the south. The projected Main Algonquin-Fort displacement in the south to progressively higher altitudes Brady shorelines (about 11,200 to 10,500 B.P.) plunge in the north. The zone at which steeply sloping northern below the level of Lake Michigan at the •hinge line• of terraces blended with a relatively horizontal terrace in the former models and intersect the southern lake bottom south was identified as a hinge line (fig. 2). This explana­ between altitudes 60 and 95 m. tion, which has varied little since the first decade of this Red glaciolacustrine clays, contained in the century, reflects the rigid-earth models favored by the Sheboygan Member of the Lake Michigan Formation and early researchers in the region (Chamberlin and Salis­ transported by meltwater from the Lake Superior basin, are bury, 1904; Chamberlin, 1909, 1926; Taylor, 1910). contemporary with the Main Algonquin-Fort Brady shore­ lines. The descending altitude of these red clays to the The Algonquin shoreline, as defined, has subse­ south points to continuous deformation of the lake basin as quently been used to establish postglacial lake-level chro­ low-level lakes drained northward through lower outlets nologies in the upper Great Lakes region (most recently near North Bay, Ontario. Drexler and others, 1983; Farrand and Drexler, 1985). Comparative regression analyses of the Main More important, however, is that the deformation of the Algonquin shoreline data between lake basins show the Algonquin shoreline has been used to model the glacio­ Main Algonquin of Huron (MAH) to lie altitudinally above isostatic recovery of the Great Lakes basin (Broecker, the Main Algonquin of Michigan (MAM). The MAH was a 1966, 1970; Walcott, 1970, 1972; Brotchie and Silvester, separate low-level preglacial lake with an outlet control at 1969). Thus, ironically, the geomorphic interpretations of Fenelon Falls, Ontario. Its level fell when the isostatically lower Kirkfield outlet system was deglaciated about 11,500 the rigid-earth era are used to examine the responses of a B.P. The MAM, on the other hand, reflects a confluent visco-elastic crust to ice loading. low-level lake in the Michigan and Huron basins that formed upon deglaciation of the Mackinac Straits about This paper investigates the nature of the deformed 11,200 B.P. The MAM drained northward through the Foss­ Main Algonquin shoreline in the Lake Michigan basin mill outlet system south of North Bay, Ontario. and the concept of the hinge line. In an earlier paper (Larsen, 1985b), the rates of measured vertical crustal INTRODUCTION movements, as determined from lake-level gauge records (Clark and Persoage, 1970; Coordinating Committee on Lake Algonquin is currently thought to be the Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, 1977), were shown largest and latest proglacial lake to occupy the three to increase exponentially with distance northward from upper Great Lakes (fig. 1). It is currently considered to the southern shore of Lake Michigan. Following Gilbert's have drained southward through the St. Clair River at Port (1898) suggestion that measured vertical crustal move­ Huron, Mich., and through the Des Plaines and Illinois ments were central to understanding the uplift history of River valleys near Chicago, Ill. the Great Lakes, the middle Holocene Nipissing and The Algonquin shoreline was first described along Algoma shorelines were also shown to conform to an the eastern shore of Lake Huron by Spencer (1888, 1891 ), exponential model (Andrews, 1970a,b). Introduction 1 I -; 100 100 200 • I I -Kilometers Figure 1. Main Lake Algonquin draining southward controlled overflow through the Fossmill outlet. NB is the through the Chicago (C) and Port Huron (PH) outlets. The threshold to the North Bay outlet. Early Lake Erie drains Fenelon Falls (FF) spillway to the Kirkfield outlet has been eastward through the Niagara River (NR) to Lake Iroquois abandoned. The northern outlets remain ice covered. KL in the Lake Ontario basin. (Based on Hough, 1958, 1963; and ML are the Kilrush Lake and Mink Lake sills that Eschman and Karrow, 1985.) Comparison among the historic, middle Holocene, better understand the Great Lakes. Peter Sly deserves and late Wisconsinan deformation of the former shore­ special thanks for patiently reading each draft and pro­ lines suggests that (1) uplift was a continuous glacio­ viding thoughtful comments. Both he and Christine isostatic response to deglaciation of the region, (2) the Kaszycki shared data with me and increased my awareness hinge line of former usage is an invalid concept, (3) the of the Lake Huron basin. Paul F. Karrow and C.F.M. Main Algonquin water plane of Lake Michigan reflected Lewis provided perspectives on their own Great Lakes a low-level phase of the upper lakes, and ( 4) Main Lake research.
Recommended publications
  • Landscriptsummer 2019 Volume 71
    landscriptSUMMER 2019 Volume 71 Lower Woodcock Lake – A Gem in the Platte Watershed A New Preserve on Torch Lake Arcadia Marsh UA Trail Open PHOTO BY D SMITH GTRLC.ORG 1 Protecting significant natural, scenic and farm lands — and advancing stewardship — now and for future generations. PHOTO BY DEKE LUDWIG A Letter from Glen Chown FRIENDS, Not long ago, I came across a quote from the there are the organized trail-building work days We are setting a new standard of excellence legendary naturalist Sir David Attenborough that at places like the newly opened Maplehurst in design and quality of construction that is really stuck with me: “No one will protect what Natural Area where people joyfully contribute exemplified at places like Arcadia Marsh (page they don’t care about, and no one will care about sweat equity to make a tangible impact. XX). And there is a deeply spiritual dimension what they have never experienced.” to “access to nature” investments that I did Since the beginning of the not fully anticipate when we envisioned this As we continue to make campaign, our dedicated campaign. I will never forget the comment of great progress with our staff and board have one dedicated supporter after stepping onto ambitious Campaign for worked hard to make the marsh boardwalk for the very first time. Generations goals, I feel sure that our supporters, “I feel like I am walking on water. What the overjoyed at the truly partners, and the general Conservancy has done here is truly miraculous,” remarkable projects we’ve public have opportunities she exclaimed, her face radiant.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
    Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario a Voice!
    Statue Stories Chicago: The Public Writing Competition Give Lake Ontario a voice! Behind the Art Institute of Chicago, is the Fountain of the Great Lakes. Within the famous fountain is the wistful figure of Lake Ontario. She sits apart from her sister lakes, gazing into the distance with arms outstretched. But what does she have to say for herself? Write a Monologue! Monologos means “speaking alone” in Greek, but we all know that people who speak without thinking about their listener can be very dull indeed. Your challenge is to find a ‘voice’ for your statue and to write an engaging monologue in 350 words. Get under your statue’s skin! Look closely and develop a sense of empathy with the sculpture and imagine how it would feel. How does Lake Ontario feel about her sister lakes? Invite your listener to feel with you: create shifts in tempo and emotion, use different tenses, figures of speech and anecdotes, sensory details and even sound effects. Finding your sculpture’s voice? Write in the first person and adopt the persona of your character: What kind of vocabulary will you use - your own or that of another era/dialect? Your words will be spoken so read them aloud: use their rhythm and your sentence structure to convey emotion and urgency. Read great monologues for inspiration, for example Hamlet’s Alas Poor Yorick, or watch film monologues, like Morgan Freeman’s in The Shawshank Redemption. How will you keep people listening? Structure your monologue! How will you introduce yourself? With a greeting, a warning, a question, an order, a riddle? Grab and hold your listener’s attention from your very first line.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Accent July 1953 - September 1954
    Southern Adventist University KnowledgeExchange@Southern Southern Accent - Student Newspaper University Archives & Publications 1953 Southern Accent July 1953 - September 1954 Southern Missionary College Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/southern_accent Recommended Citation Southern Missionary College, "Southern Accent July 1953 - September 1954" (1953). Southern Accent - Student Newspaper. 33. https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/southern_accent/33 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University Archives & Publications at KnowledgeExchange@Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Southern Accent - Student Newspaper by an authorized administrator of KnowledgeExchange@Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOUTHERN msmm college UBRMV THE OUTH^^ ACCENT Souchern Missionary^ollege, Collegedale, Tennessee, July 3. 1953 o lleven SMC Graduates Ordained Young Men Ordained to M^ Kennedy Supervises Varied Gospel Ministry f. at Five Iprog am of Summer Activities Southern Union Camp Meetings fcht chapel scat Wednesday e c n ng br ngs these comn ents for once tadi week we ha\e chapel Many % r cd ch-ipel progran s ha e been '> p anned bj Dr R chard Hammill of the college rfOMffliililiins ! Thursday udenb and it d(-r e\en ng at the ball field br ngs torth to bu Id up cred cheers as a runner si des the hon e or as the umpire calls 6tr kc Three Student o^ram Comm ... and h ult) al ke mansh p of Profc share the thr II of a hon e run V d) hi\e out! ned Come th me
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Glaciers.PM6
    How the Ice Age Shaped Indiana Jerry Wilson Published by Wilstar Media, www.wilstar.com Indianapolis, Indiana 1 Previiously published as The Topography of Indiana: Ice Age Legacy, © 1988 by Jerry Wilson. Second Edition Copyright © 2008 by Jerry Wilson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 For Aaron and Shana and In Memory of Donna 3 Introduction During the time that I have been a science teacher I have tried to enlist in my students the desire to understand and the ability to reason. Logical reasoning is the surest way to overcome the unknown. The best aid to reasoning effectively is having the knowledge and an understanding of the things that have previ- ously been determined or discovered by others. Having an understanding of the reasons things are the way they are and how they got that way can help an individual to utilize his or her resources more effectively. I want my students to realize that changes that have taken place on the earth in the past have had an effect on them. Why are some towns in Indiana subject to flooding, whereas others are not? Why are cemeteries built on old beach fronts in Northwest Indiana? Why would it be easier to dig a basement in Valparaiso than in Bloomington? These things are a direct result of the glaciers that advanced southward over Indiana during the last Ice Age. The history of the land upon which we live is fascinating. Why are there large granite boulders nested in some of the fields of northern Indiana since Indiana has no granite bedrock? They are known as glacial erratics, or dropstones, and were formed in Canada or the upper Midwest hundreds of millions of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • Champlain Valley (Why Are Clay Soils Where They Are?)
    Geomorphic history of the Champlain Valley (why are clay soils where they are?) part 1) How did landscape evolve and where do “clay” minerals come from? part 2) How were they deposited in Lake Vermont/ Champlain Sea? part 3) Can we predict the distribution of “clay” thickness? (…can we compare prediction with what people observe) 500,000,000 years Today ~500,000,000 years: Sediments of “Champlain Valley Sequence” deposited on shoreline of ancient ocean Monkton quartzite + Taconic Slates Limestones + Marbles ~460,000,000 years: Collision of island arc causes thrusting + metamorphism Champlain Thrust Fault Champlain Thrust: -Exposed at Snake Mtn + Mt. Philo -delineates boundary between “low” and “mid” grade metamorphic rocks -Marbles pf middlebury syncline folded along back of thrust -Topography of Addison County reflects erodibility of bedrock: T1: lower surface: “low grade” sedimentary rocks below thrust (e.g. shale) T2: upper surface: “mid grade” meta-sedimentary rocks above thrust (e.g. marble) Green Mountains= “high grade” metamorphic rocks (e.g. schist and gneiss) T1 T2 Green Mtn gneiss Geologic map of Addison County Taconics Part 2: How were clays deposited in Lake Vermont and the Champlain Sea? 500,000,000 years Today ~96,000 - 20,000 years (i.e. yesterday…): Champlain Valley sat below 1-3 km of ice Soils and clay minerals from previous inter-glacial cycles were stripped by advancing glaciers Rocks were ground into “clay size fraction” and trapped under ice retreating glacial ice withdrew from Champlain Valley between ~14-13 kyr Many depositional features in Champlain Valley record ice retreat -Layers of “basal till” deposited beneath ice sheets (coarse, angular, poorly sorted debris) -Meltwater streams flow between glacier and hillslopes -Sedimentary deposits accumulate, leaving ‘kame terraces’ when glacier retreats Lake Vermont had 2+ stages: Coveville: Ice dammed in So.
    [Show full text]
  • Isobases of the Algonquin and Iroquois Beaches, and Their Significance1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 21, PP. 227-248, PL. 5 JUNE 10, 1910 ISOBASES OF THE ALGONQUIN AND IROQUOIS BEACHES, AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE1 BY JAMES WALTER GOl.DTHWAIT (Read before the Society December 28, 1909) CONTENTS Page Introduction ............................................................................................................... 227 The Algonquin w ater-p lan e.................................................................................... 229 Stage recorded by the Algonquin beach.......................................................229 Isobases of the upwarped portion of the Algonquin plane...................... 233 The horizontal portion of the Algonquin plane.......................................... 236 The “hinge line” or “isobase of zero” ............................................................ 239 The Algonquin plane as a datum plane........................................................ 240 The Iroquois w ater-plane........................................................................................ 241 Relative ages of the Iroquois beach and the Algonquin beach..............241 Isobases of the Iroquois plane........................................................................ 242 Comparison of the two water-planes.................................................................... 243 The isobases and the pre-Cambrian boundary.................................................... 245 Summary ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Region Michigan
    Northwest Region Michigan Michigan’s Northwest Region offers a rich blend of adventure, relaxation and breathtaking natural attractions, making it a must for your travel bucket list. Don’t miss “The Most Beautiful Place in America,” also known as Sleeping Bear Sand Dunes National Lakeshore. In addition to epic sand dunes, the park features forests, historical sites and ancient glacial phenomena. A drive along M-22 will prove though that this is no diamond in the rough – Lake Michigan and the countless inland lakes in the region offer a chance to experience a Lake Effect like no other. CAMPGROUND LOCATIONS: 1. Wilderness State Park Campground Why We Love This Campground: Wilderness State Park offers visitors a variety of year-round recreational activities within its over 10,000 acres. Wilderness areas and 26 miles of beautiful Lake Michigan shoreline provide great places to observe nature from the numerous trails throughout the park. Max RV Length: 45' # Of Sites: 250 Fee: $22-$45 Address: 903 Wilderness Park Dr. Carp Lake MI Contact: (231) 436-5381 2. Petoskey State Park Campground Why We Love This Campground: The Oden Fish Hatchery is a short drive from the park and one of the most advanced facilities of its kind. For anyone interested in how brook and brown trout are raised, this is the premier destination. Max RV Length: 40' # Of Sites: 180 Fee: $31-$37 Address: 2475 M-119 Hwy. Petoskey MI Contact: (231) 347-2311 3. Young State Park Campground Why We Love This Campground: Young State Park on beautiful Lake Charlevoix spans over 560 acres and is a mix of gently rolling terrain, lowlands and cedar swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Iroquois Confederacy?
    04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 82 What was the 4 Iroquois Confederacy? Chapter Focus Questions •What was the social structure of Iroquois society? •What opportunities did people have to participate in decision making? •What were the ideas behind the government of the Iroquois Confederacy? The last chapter explored the government of ancient Athens. This chapter explores another government with deep roots in history: the Iroquois Confederacy. The Iroquois Confederacy formed hundreds of years ago in North America — long before Europeans first arrived here. The structure and principles of its government influenced the government that the United States eventually established. The Confederacy united five, and later six, separate nations. It had clear rules and procedures for making decisions through representatives and consensus. It reflected respect for diversity and a belief in the equality of people. Pause The image on the side of this page represents the Iroquois Confederacy and its five original member nations. It is a symbol as old as the Confederacy itself. Why do you think this symbol is still honoured in Iroquois society? 82 04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 83 What are we learning in this chapter? Iroquois versus Haudenosaunee This chapter explores the social structure of Iroquois There are two names for society, which showed particular respect for women and the Iroquois people today: for people of other cultures. Iroquois (ear-o-kwa) and Haudenosaunee It also explores the structure and processes of Iroquois (how-den-o-show-nee). government. Think back to Chapter 3, where you saw how Iroquois is a name that the social structure of ancient Athens determined the way dates from the fur trade people participated in its government.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING and CHARACTERIZING a RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA in CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN by Christopher B. Connallon a THESIS Submitted T
    MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZING A RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA IN CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN By Christopher B. Connallon A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Geography – Master of Science 2015 ABSTRACT MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZING A RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA IN CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN By Christopher B. Connallon This research focuses on, mapping and characterizing the Chippewa River delta - a sandy, relict delta of Glacial Lake Saginaw in central Lower Michigan. The delta was first identified in a GIS, using digital soil data, as the sandy soils of the delta stand in contrast to the loamier soils of the lake plain. I determined the textural properties of the delta sediment from 142 parent material samples at ≈1.5 m depth. The data were analyzed in a GIS to identify textural trends across the delta. Data from 3276 water well logs across the delta, and from 185 sites within two-storied soils on the delta margin, were used to estimate the thickness of delta sands and to refine the delta's boundary. The delta heads near Mount Pleasant, expanding east, onto the Lake Saginaw plain. It is ≈18 km wide and ≈38 km long and comprised almost entirely of sandy sediment. As expected, delta sands generally thin away from the head, where sediments are ≈4-7m thick. In the eastern, lower portion of the delta, sediments are considerably thinner (≈<1-2m). The texturally coarsest parts of the delta are generally coincident with former shorezones. The thick, upper delta portion is generally coincident with the relict shorelines of Lakes Saginaw and Arkona (≈17.1k to ≈ 16k years BP), whereas most of the thin, distal, lower delta is generally associated with Lake Warren (≈15k years BP).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially-Explicit Modeling of Modern and Pleistocene Runoff and Lake Extent in the Great Basin Region, Western United States
    Spatially-explicit modeling of modern and Pleistocene runoff and lake extent in the Great Basin region, western United States Yo Matsubara1 Alan D. Howard1 1Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia P.O. Box 400123 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 Abstract A spatially-explicit hydrological model balancing yearly precipitation and evaporation is applied to the Great Basin Region of the southwestern United States to predict runoff magnitude and lake distribution during present and Pleistocene climatic conditions. The model iteratively routes runoff through, and evaporation from, depressions to find a steady state solution. The model is calibrated with spatially-explicit annual precipitation estimates and compiled data on pan evaporation, mean annual temperature, and total yearly runoff from stations. The predicted lake distribution provides a close match to present-day lakes. For the last glacial maximum the sizes of lakes Bonneville and Lahontan were well predicted by linear combinations of decrease in mean annual temperature from 0 to 6 °C and increases in precipitation from 0.8 to 1.9 times modern values. Estimated runoff depths were about 1.2 to 4.0 times the present values and yearly evaporation about 0.3 to 1 times modern values. 2 1. Introduction The Great Basin of the southwestern United States in the Basin and Range physiographic province contains enclosed basins featuring perennial and ephemeral lakes, playas and salt pans (Fig. 1). The Great Basin consists of the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. At present it supports an extremely dry, desert environment; however, about 40 lakes (some reaching the size of present day Great Lakes) episodically occupied the Great Basin, most recently during the last glacial maximum (LGM) [Snyder and Langbein, 1962; Hostetler et al., 1994; Madsen et al., 2001].
    [Show full text]