Beyond the Carbon Curse: a Study of the Governance Foundations of Climate Change Politics in Australia, Canada and Norway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond the Carbon Curse: a Study of the Governance Foundations of Climate Change Politics in Australia, Canada and Norway Beyond the Carbon Curse: a Study of the Governance Foundations of Climate Change Politics in Australia, Canada and Norway by Nathan C Lemphers A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Nathan Lemphers 2020 Beyond the Carbon Curse: A study of the governance foundations of climate change politics in Australia, Canada and Norway Nathan Lemphers Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2020 Abstract Without risking hyperbole, climate change is the greatest political challenge humanity has ever faced. The world must achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century if the most catastrophic damage is to be avoided. The prospect of environmental transformation is most remote for major fossil fuel-exporting countries. Yet amongst the world’s largest exporters of carbon, three countries are more likely to make a transition: Australia, Canada and Norway. Across these three countries, significant climate policy variation exists. Norway developed an early, broad, diverse and durable suite of climate policies compared to Australia and Canada. In this dissertation, I explain the climate policy variation of these three countries and why responses from sympathetic governments were able to make headway and entrench policies in some cases but not others. A novel analytical framework is created to explain these outcomes using within-case process tracing and a comparative case study. Data is obtained largely through interviews with 124 informants and primary document analysis. II My central finding is that the governance foundations of climate policy are critical in explaining climate policy. State strength matters. A strong and democratic state has the potential to assuage the political risk facing economic and regime elites from climate policy. It can restructure policy networks to empower civil society so that transformative climate policy is more likely to be announced and implemented. State strength can explain why switching governments in Australia and to some degree in Canada, as opposed to Norway, meant slow shifts and easy reversal. This dissertation contributes in several ways to the scholarship on comparative environmental politics and green state political theory. First, it foregrounds the role of the state in comparative environmental politics by emphasizing the unique and critical role that states play in providing the governance foundations needed to domestically decarbonize. Second, it theorizes linkages that can reconcile the green state literature with the economic growth imperative and the biogeochemical limits of the planet. Lastly, it provides theoretical insights into the transformative and democratic role of the strong state in addressing climate change by stressing inclusivity throughout the policymaking process. III Acknowledgements This dissertation was borne out of my ignorance and curiosity in how other countries with a similar reliance on fossil fuels production have managed climate policy. Many years later, it is safe to say I have more tools and wisdom than I did before. However, I did not get here on my own. My former colleagues at the Pembina Institute inspired and encouraged my curiosity and got shit done, particularly Clare Demerse, Simon Dyer, Jennifer Grant, Julia Kilpatrick, Jeremy Moorhouse, Aarti Rana, Marlo Raynolds, Tim Weis, Ed Whittingham, and Dan Woynillowicz. Thanks also to my colleagues at Oil Change International, where I worked in my final year of my doctoral studies as I was wrapping up my dissertation. Hannah McKinnon, Matt Maiorana, Greg Muttitt, Kelly Trout, Alex Doukas, Collin Rees, Elizabeth Bast and Steve Kretzmann were a collective source of inspiration for me as exceptionally bright, committed and strategic activists on the leading edge of the climate movement. A special award goes to my dissertation supervisor Steven Bernstein, who took me under his wing knowing I had not taken a political science course in my life. Steven provided generous and sage advice as he guided me through the crucible of doctoral research. My other dissertation committee members, Grace Skogstad and Lou Pauly, shared prescient and timely advice, giving me room to discover things on my own but guidance to anticipate and steer away from intellectual traps. Thanks also to my internal examiner, Matthew Hoffmann, who helped me focus my argument and reminded me of the normative dimensions to my work. Angela Carter, my external examiner, renewed my excitement in turning this dissertation into a timely book. I am deeply appreciated the feedback I received on my dissertation from other academics in Canada, especially Kathryn Harrison, Peter Dauvergne, Jennifer Clapp, Graeme Auld and Laurie Adkin. To the administrative support of the Department of Political Science, notably Carolynn Branton, Mary-Alice Bailey, and Lou Tentsos, I salute you. Your behind-the-scenes work keeps the department afloat and its many graduate students able to navigate our time at the University. IV My friends and colleagues at the University of Toronto’s Department of Political Science and the Environmental Governance Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs were a cherished source of camaraderie and inspiration over the past six years: Steven Denney, Emile Dirks, Wayne Zhu, Laura Tozer, Heather Millar, Hamish van der Ven, Dave Gordon, Erica Petkov, Jacqueline Peterson, Eve Bourgeois, and Amy Janzwood. While I was living in Toronto, I had the privilege to be a Junior Fellow at Massey College. The richly diverse conversations I had with the Massey College community fed the multidisciplinary part of my brain and provided a respite from the, at times restricting, confines of political science. The Round Room offered an appropriately dignified and somewhat intimidating venue for my dissertation defence. For four years during my dissertation, I was a Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation Scholar. It is difficult to enumerate the number of kindred spirits and sources of inspiration I found within the Foundation’s community. There are too many to name them all here but at the core was my 2014 cohort of scholars and Josée St-Martin, the Foundation’s scholarship administrator. For my Canada-based research, I have deep gratitude to Michael Horgan, my mentor through the Trudeau Foundation, who shared his insights as Canada’s Deputy Minister of Finance, Environment, and Natural Resources. He helped open the doors to many key interviews. Former Canadian High Commissioner to Australia Michael Small, Former Canadian Ambassador to Norway Jillian Stirk and Else Kveinen at Norway’s Ottawa Embassy provided valuable advice prior to my international fieldwork. For 5 months in 2017, I had the privilege of living in Oslo. I was a Visiting PhD Student at the climate change policy think tank, CICERO, based at the University of Oslo. Guri Bang and Arild Underdal were instrumental in bringing me on board and making me feel at home. I’d like to thank the members of the climate policy team there, notably: Bård Lahn, Merethe Dotterud Leiren, Solveig Aamodt, Elin Lerum Boasson, Håkon Sælen, and Erlend Hermansen. Much gratitude to Kristin Halvorsen for your interview and your introductions to luminary Norwegians and for Nathalie Schaller for guiding Marie-Camille and I through the underground world of Franco-expat-parents in Oslo. Also in Oslo, I was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI). This connection would not have been possible without V Mikkel Pedersen who found a home for me within the think thank’s Energy and Russia Group. My colleagues Indra Overland, Helge Blakkisrud, Roman Valkchuk, Elana Wilson Rowe, Jakub Godzimirski, Kristian Lundby Gjerde, Kristin Fjæstad, Malin Østevik, and Sigrid Valberg were an excellent collective sounding board on my initial research interviews and helped to educate me on Norway-Russian energy relations. Thanks to Elin Maria Fiane for your outstanding support with the NUPI library. Beyond those at CICERO and NUPI, thanks must be given to the broader community of scholars that welcomed my curiosity: Oluf Langhelle, Helge Ryggvik, Einar Lie, Klaus Mohn, Jon Birger Skjærseth, Tine Handeland, Fay Farstad, Dag Harald Claes, Peter Notre, Else Grete Broderstad, and Berit Kristoffersen. Many thanks to Synnøve Hageberg, the ever-patient librarian at the Norwegian Oil Museum in Stavanger. During my four months in Australia, I had the fortune of being based at the University of Melbourne’s Australia-German Climate and Energy College. It was Anita Talberg that initially recruited me and made me and my family feel immediately welcome in Australia. College Director Malte Meinshausen and his mötley crüe of PhD students provided an engaging and family-friendly environment to puzzle through Australian politics. Thanks to Annabelle Workman and Stephen Pollard for showing me it is possible to have two kids and stay sane while completing a dissertation. Robyn Eckersley, who had the odious task of being my local supervisor in Melbourne, provided excellent counsel on my research as it unfolded Down Under. I would be remiss not to thank the other academics who took the time to meet with me including: Peter Christoff, Paul Burke, Evgeny Postnikov, Christopher Wright, Frank Jotzo, Ross Garnaut, Clive Hamilton, Hugh Saddler, Kate Crowley, Chris Riedy, Tim Flannery, David Karoly and Jim Stanford. It did not take long after arriving in Melbourne for some of our local neighbours to befriend us. Thanks for making us feel at home so quickly. The efficient librarians at the National Library of Australia were very helpful. The staff of the Blackwater International Coal Centre in Central Queensland and the Hunter Valley Coal Industry Centre and local activists in both coal regions shared with me crucial local dimensions that did not emerge from my interviews with downtown elites. I would like thank the 124 interviewees who shared their time and wisdom with me as I sought to solve what I think is particularly vexing public policy issue. A full list of interviewees can be found at the end of my dissertation.
Recommended publications
  • Industry Associations & ASX Companies
    Industry Associations, ASX Companies, Shareholder Interests and Lobbying CONTENTS About the Authors ........................................................................................................................ 3 ACCR ............................................................................................................................................ 3 About ISS-caer ............................................................................................................................. 3 About the Report .......................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 Report Structure .......................................................................................................................... 6 PART 1 - Background ................................................................................................................... 8 What is an Industry Association? .............................................................................................. 8 Advantages and Disadvantages of Belonging to an Industry Association ........................... 10 Australian Legislation and Regulations Covering Industry Associations ............................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth Lobby and Australia's Immigration Policy
    THE GROWTH LOBBY AND AUSTRALIA’S IMMIGRATION POLICY Katharine Betts and Michael Gilding Immigration boosts Australia’s population growth. A growth lobby concentrated among interests based in housing, land development and construction profits from this and actively lobbies for it. During the early years of the Howard Government (1996 to 1999) the lobby faced the novel situation of a presumably pro-business government that reduced immigration. Eventually this induced the lobby to mobilise and to go public, rendering its activity more visible than before. From July 2000 the Government embarked on a series of steep increases in the intake. By the early 1990s immigration in Australia identifies the available evidence on the had become unpopular. In 1991, 73 per cent lobby’s responses to the uncharacteristic of voters said that the numbers coming in state of play in the late 1990s. Fourth, it were ‘too many’ and, in 1996, 71 per cent outlines an alternative explanation for the were still of this opinion. After its 1996 increase in immigration: a growing need election victory, the new Coalition Govern- for skills. Finally, it summarises the ment led by John Howard embarked on a circumstantial evidence for the lobby’s role program of immigration reform. It reori- in ending the immigration lull. ented the program towards skilled migration and away from family reunion, IMMIGRATION AND and cut down on fraud. It also reduced the POPULATION GROWTH numbers by 13 per cent, introducing a lull Australians see the 25 years after 1947 as a in the migrant intake. time of mass migration. Indeed the number The economy was buoyant and the of settler arrivals in the immediate post-war reduction unexpected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bathurst Bay Hurricane: Media, Memory and Disaster
    The Bathurst Bay Hurricane: Media, Memory and Disaster Ian Bruce Townsend Bachelor of Arts (Communications) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract In 1899, one of the most powerful cyclones recorded struck the eastern coast of Cape York, Queensland, resulting in 298 known deaths, most of whom were foreign workers of the Thursday Island pearling fleets. Today, Australia’s deadliest cyclone is barely remembered nationally, although there is increasing interest internationally in the cyclone’s world record storm surge by scientists studying past cyclones to assess the risks of future disasters, particularly from a changing climate. The 1899 pearling fleet disaster, attributed by Queensland Government meteorologist Clement Wragge to a cyclone he named Mahina, has not until now been the subject of scholarly historical inquiry. This thesis examines the evidence, as well as the factors that influenced how the cyclone and its disaster have been remembered, reported, and studied. Personal and public archives were searched for references to, and evidence for, the event. A methodology was developed to test the credibility of documents and the evidence they contained, including the data of interest to science. Theories of narrative and memory were applied to those documents to show how and why evidence changed over time. Finally, the best evidence was used to reconstruct aspects of the event, including the fate of several communities, the cyclone’s track, and the elements that contributed to the internationally significant storm tide. The thesis concludes that powerful cultural narratives were responsible for the nation forgetting a disaster in which 96 percent of the victims were considered not to be citizens of the anticipated White Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Nineteen
    Chapter Six The Politics of Federalism Ben Davies In 1967 Sir Robert Menzies published Central Power in the Australian Commonwealth. In this book he adopted the labels coined by Lord Bryce to describe the two forces which operate in a federation—the centripetal and the centrifugal. For those uneducated in physics, such as myself, centripetal means those forces which draw power towards the centre, or the Commonwealth, whilst centrifugal forces are those which draw power outwards towards the States. Menzies remarked that these forces are constantly competing against each other, and that the balance between them is never static.1 Not surprisingly, his view in 1967 was that the centripetal forces had well and truly predominated during the previous 66 years of Federation. Of course, he would not need long to reach the same conclusion were he to consider the same question now, 40 years later. Essentially there are three levels on which these two forces exert themselves. The first and most fundamental is the legal level, which describes the constitutional structures which determine the federal balance. On questions of federalism this Society has since its inception quite rightly concentrated most on this level of federalism, as it is at this level that the most profound changes have occurred. It is also the most influential level, as it sets the boundaries within which the other two levels can operate. The second level is what I would call the financial level, and this level concerns itself with the question of the relative financial powers of the States and Commonwealth. In particular, this level is characterised by the ever-increasing financial dominance of the Commonwealth relative to the States, and the “vertical fiscal imbalance” with which the States have had to contend for most of their existence since Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol15no4.Pdf
    A new award for young writers Eureka Street is delighted to announce the inaugural Margaret Dooley Young Writers' Award One of the di These arguments ideally address peo pl e who own religious be li ef, and those whose view of the world is secu lar. To reflect ethical ly on public issues is a demanding discipline. h•s field. Margaret and Brendan Dooley have longstanding connection s to the Jesuits and Xavier Co llege . Margaret always appreciated the value of commun ication and education for young people, based on spiritual and personal val ues. She graduated from Sacre Coeur College in 1950, com menced nursing at St Vin ce nt's Hospital and, with Brendan, raised four chil dren. Margaret died in 2004. The Dooley family are pleased to support th is initiative. previously published or unpublished, under the age of 40. Entrants must submit two previously unpublished articles that offer: ethical reflection directed to a non-specialist audience on any serious to pic, appeal to humane values, such as those that are found within, but are not exclusive to, the best of the Christian trad ition , clear argument and elegant expression, and a generosity and courtesy of spirit animating forceful argument. One article shou ld be of no more than 800 words. The second shoul d be of no more than 2000 words. They may take up the sa me, or different, topics. Entries are to be submitted by 5pm Friday, 29 July 2005, to : Margaret Dooley Young Writers' Award, Eureka Street, PO Box 553, Richmond VIC 3121.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Neo-Liberalism? Justifications of Deregulating Financial Markets in Norway and Finland © SIFO 2015 Project Note No 6 – 2015
    Project note no 6-2015 Pekka Sulkunen What is Neo-liberalism? Justifications of deregulating financial markets in Norway and Finland © SIFO 2015 Project Note no 6 – 2015 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Sandakerveien 24 C, Building B P.O. Box 4682 Nydalen N-0405 Oslo www.sifo.no Due to copyright restrictions, this report is not to be copied from or distributed for any purpose without a special agreement with SIFO. Reports made available on the www.sifo.no site are for personal use only. Copyright infringement will lead to a claim for compensation. Prosjektrapport nr.6 - 2015 Tittel Antall sider Dato 48 27.10.2015 Title ISBN ISSN What is Neo-liberalism? Justifications of deregulating financial markets in Norway and Finland Forfatter(e) Prosjektnummer Faglig ansvarlig sign. Pekka Sulkunen 11201014 Oppdragsgiver Norges Forskningsråd Sammendrag Rapporten dokumenter at dereguleringen av den norske og finske økonomien først og fremst handlet om politikk og politiske prosesser, og i liten grad begrunnet i økonomisk teori. Heller ikke neoliberal filosofi slik vi kjenner den fra USA og Storbritannia spilte noen stor rolle i de to landene. Isteden handlet det om forestillingen om, og fremveksten av, en ny type velferdsstat med behov for en moralsk legitimering av autonomi. Summary The report documents that the deregulation of the Norwegian and Finnish economy primarily was about politics and political processes, and to a much lesser extent about justifications rooted in economic theory. Nor neoliberal philosophy as we know it from the US and Britain played a major role in the two countries. Instead, it was about the notion, and the emergence of, a new kind of welfare state in need of a moral legitimization of autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Construction of Climate Change: Deconstructing the Climate Change Debate in Australia
    The Social Construction of Climate Change: Deconstructing the Climate Change Debate in Australia Author Hytten, Karen F Published 2013 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environemnt DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1670 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366505 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The Social Construction of Climate Change Deconstructing the Climate Change Debate in Australia _________________________________________________________________________ Karen F. Hytten B Env Mgt (Hons) 31 May 2013 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane. i ii Abstract _________________________________________________________________________ Since the 1980s there has been a growing recognition of the significant risks associated with climate change. By 2007, the scientific evidence that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions were causing global warming was irrefutable. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its Fourth Assessment Report which describes in great detail the biophysical and social impacts of climate change, some of which are already being experienced. Many argue that Australia is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It is also widely acknowledged that as one of the highest per-capita emitters in the world, Australia has a particular responsibility to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. However, despite this, Australia’s response to climate change has been largely inadequate, giving rise to a need for research into factors shaping this response. Research has identified the important role that discourses play in shaping perceptions of climate change and responses to the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Stortingsvalget 1965. Hefte II Oversikt
    OGES OISIEE SAISIKK II 199 SOIGSAGE 6 EE II OESIK SOIG EECIOS 6 l II Gnrl Srv SAISISK SEAYÅ CEA UEAU O SAISICS O OWAY OSO 66 Tidligere utkommet. Statistik vedkommende Valgmandsvalgene og Stortingsvalgene 1815-1885: NOS III 219, 1888: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 7, 1889, suppl. 2, 1891: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 10, 1891, suppl. 2, 1894 III 245, 1897 III 306, 1900 IV 25, 1903 IV 109. Stortingsvalget 1906 NOS V 49, 1909 V 128, 1912 V 189, 1915 VI 65, 1918 VI 150, 1921 VII 66, 1924 VII 176, 1927 VIII 69, 1930 VIII 157, 1933 IX 26, 1936 IX 107, 1945 X 132, 1949 XI 13, 1953 XI 180, 1957 XI 299, 1961 XII 68, 1961 A 126. Stortingsvalget 1965 I NOS A 134. MARIENDALS BOKTRYKKERI A/S, GJØVIK Forord I denne publikasjonen er det foretatt en analyse av resultatene fra stortings- valget 1965. Opplegget til analysen er stort sett det samme som for stortings- valget 1961 og bygger på et samarbeid med Chr. Michelsens Institutt og Institutt for Samfunnsforskning. Som tillegg til oversikten er tatt inn de offisielle valglister ved stortingsvalget i 1965. Detaljerte talloppgaver fra stortingsvalget er offentliggjort i Stortingsvalget 1965, hefte I (NOS A 134). Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Oslo, 1. juni 1966. Petter Jakob Bjerve Gerd Skoe Lettenstrom Preface This publication contains a survey of the results of the Storting elections 1965. The survey appears in approximately the same form as the survey of the 1961 elections and has been prepared in co-operation with Chr. Michelsen's Institute and the Institute for Social Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?
    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Author Tiernan, Anne-Maree Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Politics and Public Policy DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3587 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367746 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Ministerial Staff under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Anne-Maree Tiernan BA (Australian National University) BComm (Hons) (Griffith University) Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 Abstract This thesis traces the development of the ministerial staffing system in Australian Commonwealth government from 1972 to the present. It explores four aspects of its contemporary operations that are potentially problematic. These are: the accountability of ministerial staff, their conduct and behaviour, the adequacy of current arrangements for managing and controlling the staff, and their fit within a Westminster-style political system. In the thirty years since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government, the ministerial staffing system has evolved to become a powerful new political institution within the Australian core executive. Its growing importance is reflected in the significant growth in ministerial staff numbers, in their increasing seniority and status, and in the progressive expansion of their role and influence. There is now broad acceptance that ministerial staff play necessary and legitimate roles, assisting overloaded ministers to cope with the unrelenting demands of their jobs. However, recent controversies involving ministerial staff indicate that concerns persist about their accountability, about their role and conduct, and about their impact on the system of advice and support to ministers and prime ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Beretning 1989-1990 Beretning for Perioden 01.01.1989
    eretnin 01.01.1989 - 30.06.1990 Arbeiderpartiet Det norskeArbeiderparti ' Det norske Arbeiderparti BERETNING 01.01. 1989 - 30.06. 1990 utarbeidet av partikontoret Grafiskproduksjon: Gjerholm Grafiska.s, Oslo ' Innhold. INNLEDNING ................... 1 ARBEIDERBEVEGELSENS INTERNASJONALE STØTTEKOMITE 37 LANDSMØTET 1989 .............. 2 DNA.S STORTINGSGRUPPE ...... 38 SENTRALSTYRET ................ 4 REGJERINGENS VIRKSOMHET ..... 44 LANDSSTYRET .................. 6 AKTUELT PERSPEKTIV .......... 45 Revisjonsnemda . .... ......... 7 Landsstyrets møter ........... 7 KVINNEBEVEGELSEN ........... 46 SAMARBEIDSKOMITEEN ARBEIDERNES UNGDOMSFYLKNING . 61 MELLOM LO OG DNA .... ...... 13 ARBEIDERBLADET A/S ....... .. 65 PARTIETS REPRESENTASJON I STYRER OG KOMITEER . ....... 14 A-PRESSEN I 1989 OG 1990 ... 67 ARBEI DERBEVEGELSENS PARTIKONTORET .... ............ 16 ARKIV OG BIBLIOTEK . ....... 70 PARTIETS FYLKESSEKRETÆRER 16 ÅRSMØTER I FYLKESPARTIENE 17 ORGANISASJONSARBEIDET ........ 18 Medlemsutviklingen ........... 18 Fra prat til praksis ...... ... 21 Planleggingsheftet . .... .... 21 Sekretærkonferansene ... ...... 21 Studiearbeidet ............... 23 Valgkampen 1989 .............. 24 INFORMASJONSVI RKSOMHETEN ..... 26 LANDSKOMMUNALUTVALGET ........ 27 Lokalpo litisk manifest ..... .. 27 Kommunenes Sentralforbund .... 28 Kommunalt samarbeid i Norden . 30 Kommunalkontoret . .......... .. 30 SAMETI NGSGRUPPA .............. 31 FAGLIG/POLITISK UTVALG ....... 32 1. MAI 1989 OG 1990 .......... 33 NORDISK SAMARBEID ............ 34 EUROPEISK SAMARBEID .........
    [Show full text]
  • What Will a Labor Government Mean for Defence Industry in Australia?
    What will a Labor Government mean for Defence Industry in Australia? Hon Greg Combet AM Opinion polls suggest a change of government in the Australian Federal election in (expected) May 2019. An incoming Labor Government led by Bill Shorten will likely feature Richard Marles as Minister for Defence and Mike Kelly as Assisting Minister for Defence Industry and Support. Jason Clare, a former Minister for Defence Matériel, would likely have influence upon the defence industry portfolio in his potential role as Minister for Trade and Investment. Under a Labor Government, it is possible Shorten would appoint a new Minister for Defence Matériel (as has been an established practice for many years) given the magnitude of expenditure and complexity of the portfolio. Shorten and Marles have been associates since university and have been closely aligned during their trade union and political careers. With extensive practical experience of the Australian industry, Shorten and Marles have a record of working constructively with business leadership. Both have a sound understanding of the role and the significance of defence industry in Australia. Marles, in particular, has a greater interest in national security and strategic issues and would likely concentrate on these in the portfolio and delegate aspects of defence industry to a ministerial colleague. Labor’s defence industry policy was reviewed and adopted during the December 2018 Party National Conference. The policy is consistent with Labor’s approach when it was last in government, reiterating support for: • an Australian defence industry that provides the Australian Defence Force with the necessary capabilities; • sovereign industrial capability where required, specifically identifying naval shipbuilding; • an export focus; • the maximisation of the participation of small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) in defence projects; and • initiatives to develop workforce skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansart Interpreting Hansard Records
    HansART Interpreting Hansard Records THE ENVIRONMENT The following excerpts are taken directly from the Parliament of Australia Hansard records and have not been altered. In using Hansard, please be aware that the standardised style may have changed over time. 1 JOHN HOWARD MP, 1997 MINISTERIAL STATEMENT ON CLIMATE CHANGE Source: Parliament of Australia Since its election the government has addressed the critical issue of global warming in a way that effectively promotes Australia’s national interests. Those interests lie in both protecting Australian jobs and Australian industry whilst ensuring that Australia plays her part in the worldwide effort needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. From the start, we have made it plain that Australia would not accept an unfair share of the burden. We have rejected and will continue to reject mandatory uniform targets which advantage many developed countries to the distinct disadvantage of Australia. We have also made it plain that we are not prepared to see Australian jobs sacrificed and efficient Australian industries, particularly in the resources sector, robbed of their hard-earned, competitive advantage. Moreover, we have persistently stressed the need to involve developing countries as their participation is crucial to any lasting solution to the global warming problem. These principles have guided our approach to the greenhouse gas issue. 2 PETER MCGAURAN MP, 1997, RESPONSE TO A QUESTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE Source: Parliament of Australia I thank the member for Hinkler for his question. Representing, as he does, the city of Gladstone, he has a vital interest in all matters greenhouse. There is a great deal of misinformation and at times hysteria, often deliberately manufactured, about the issue of climate change.
    [Show full text]