DOCSLIB.ORG

And Eastern Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Eastern Pennsylvania GEOLOGY OF THE RIDGE AND VALLEY PROVINCE, NORTHWESTERN NEW JERSEY AND EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA JACK B. EPSTEIN U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va. 22092 INTRODUCTION The rocks seen in this segment of the field trip range A general transgressive-shelf sequence followed in age from Middle Ordovician to Middle Devonian and characterized mainly by tidal sediments and barrier bars constitute a.deep basin-continental-shallow shelf succes­ (Poxono Island, Bossardville, Decker, Rondout)~ suc­ sion. Within this succession, three lithotectonic units, or ceeded by generally subtidal and bar deposits (Helder­ sequences of rock that were deformed semi­ burg and Oriskany Groups), and then by deeper sub­ independently of each other, have somewhat different tidal deposits (Esopus, . Schoharie. and Buttermilk structural characteristics. Both the Alleghenian and Falls), finally giving way to another deep~water to Taconic orogenies have left their imprint on the rocks. shoaling sequence (Marcellus Shale through the Catskill Wind and water gaps are structurally controlled, thus Formation). Rocks of the Marcellus through Catskill placing doubt upon the hypothesis of regional super­ will not be seen on this trip. position. Wisconsinan deposits and erosion effects are common. We will examine these geologic features as This vertical stratigraphic sequence is complicated a well as some of the economic deposits in the area. bit because most Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian units are much thinner or are absent toward a paleo­ Figure 1 is an index map of the field-trip area, show­ positive area a few tens of miles southwest of the field­ ing the trip route and quadrangle coverage. Figure 2 is a trip area. Thus, the Palmerton Sandstone of Swartz generalized geologic map, (1939) for example, is a probable shallow-marine sand body correlative with parts of the Schoharie and the STRATIGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTS Buttermilk Falls. The Palmerton crops out near OF DEPOSITION Bossardsville at Stop 3. The stratigraphic units seen on this trip are more than 15,000 feet (4,570m) thick. Their general characteristics STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY are described in Table 1. More detail is given by Epstein and Epstein (1967, 1969, 1972; Epstein, 1973; and Ep­ The rocks in the field-trip area are disharmonically stein and others, 1967), folded. Four lithotectonic units have been mapped in eastern Pennsylvania (Epstein and Epstein, 1969), three A thick sequence of rhythmically bedded shale (now of which will be seen (fig. 3). The folds in each unit dif­ slate) and graywacke was deposited during Middle and fer, and there is evidence that the units are separated by Late Ordovician basin deepening, forming the Mar­ detachment zones or decoUements, The lithologic varia~ tinsburg Formation which averages about 11,000 feet tions and descriptions of folds are given in Table 2. (3,350m) in thickness, The Martinsburg is divided into Rocks overlying lithotectonic unit 3 are more than three members in this area--a middle graywacke-rich 10,000 feet (3,050 m) thick and are in large folds that member (Ramseyburg) separating two distinct slate­ have wavelengths of several miles (e.g., Weir Mountain dominated members (Bushkill and Pen Argyl). Taconic sync1ineand Lehighton anticline, fig. 2). We will com­ deformation and continental convergence peaked in the pare the characteristics of each of the lithotectonic units Late Ordovician when this area emerged. Uplands to the at Stops 2-4, southeast shed nearly 3,000 feet (915 m) of braided stream deposits (Minsi and Tammany Members of the Two mechanisms produced the folds: 0) flexural Shawangunk Formation), transitional continental­ folding, in which bedding was active and movement was shallow marine sediments (Lizard Creek Member of the either by slip (flexural slip) or flow (flexural flow), and Shawangunk Formation), and meandering stream (2) passive folding, in which movement was along deposits (Bloomsburg Red Beds). laminar flow planes (passive flow) or slip planes (passive 70 ;::! "t1 tri TABLE 1. GENERALIZED DESCRIPTION OF MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN TO r MIDDLE DEVONIAN ROCKS IN THE DELAWARE WATER GAP AREA. '=' ...,Vl c:: a tr1 t---Ta------~----,-~---------------------------------------- Vl u o ..-I 'Tl a Z ::> rrl () ..-I Group, Average ~ s:: Formation, Thickness '-0 ...,o tT1 () or in Feet (m) Description ;;t1 Qj III ..., Member en ~ <!J o m .+.l -rl .c ~ 1-1 +.l • tfl:>.. <!J ..-I o (/) Ul .....:l trl o .1:'"'" Qj o .-l Buttermilk Falls 270(82) Medium-gray cherty limestone, argillaceous limestone, o 'tI i1\ "0 and calcareous argillite. Three members, from base '""!! ~ upward: Foxtown. McMichaels, and Stroudsburg. ;po Z f- '=' o Schoharie Formation 100 (30m) Medium-to-medium dark gray massive calcareous c fossiliferous (including Taonurus) siltstone. 8 tTl --1 Esopus Formation 180(55) Medium-to-dark gray silty shale and s~stone containing o Taonurus. Well developed cleavage 'T1m r '=' ~ Ridgely Sandstone 85(26) Light-to-medium gray fine-to-coarse-grained >-1 t:: ;;t1 <\I and conglomeratic fossiliferous sandstone grading ~p.. til :l Shriver Chert down into medium-dark-gray siliceous calcareous and =a 'M 0 en ,.. J..j and cherty shale and siltstone. 00 Port Ewen Shale 150(46) Medium-dark-gray fossiliferous calcareous shale and 1-1 ~ III siltstone that has well-developed cleavage. H ~ Z o o H :> Minisink l5(5m) Dark-to-medium-gray argillaceous limestone. w Q Limestone Po. :l o New Scotland 75 (23) Medium-to-dark gray cherty fossiliferous shale and C-''"' Formation limestone. Two members. from base upwards: Flatbrookville. Maskenozha. 3 ...00 :l ..c Coeymans 55-HO Medium to dark-gray argillaceous arenaceous cherty Q) -0'"' Formation (17-34) fossiliferous partly biohermal limestone and light­ .-l medium to medium gray calcareous fossiliferous pebbly ~ crossbedded sandstone and quartz pebble conglomerate. Four members. from base" upwards: Depue Limestone. Peters Valley, Shawnee Island, Stormville. a tr1 Rondout Formation 30(9) Light-to-dark-gray calcareous argillaceous fossiliferous o I: r-' <t mud-cracked limestone and medium dark-gray mud-cracked o I-I~~ dolomite: Three members. from base upwards: Dutton­ a I---t :g..., § ville. Whiteport Dolomite. Mashipacong. ~ c..!:::1 0. o 2-!!!..E '"T1 -l Decker Formation 85 (26m) Calcareous quartz-pebble conglomerate, sandstone. and ::r: siltstone. argillaceous and arenaceous fossiliferous tr1 limestone and dolomite. Wallpack Center Member. :::0 8 o m Bossardville 100(30) Medium-to dark-gray poorly fossiliferous mud cracked )­ Limestone argillaceous laminated limestone. Z t1 <: )­ Poxono Island 700~(213) Light olive gray-to-green calcareous dolomitic shale, r 1 Formation dolomite. sandstone. and siltstone. r m '"< "tl Bloomsburg Red Beds 1.500±(l457) Red, green, and gray sandstone. siltstone, and shale ""'III -Co. partly in fining-upw~rd sequences. '"o !:::I p < <tJ ::>1 Z n m Tammany 815(248) Medium-to-medium-dark-gray fine to coarse-grained Member conglomeratic (quartz and argillite pebbles as much as 2 in. lon~crossbedded and planar-bedded quartzite and minor argillite. ~ I-------------~------------~--------------------------------------------------~ Q) ~ .-/ ~ Lizard i75(84) Medium-light-gray to medium-dark-gray and light-olive "=' -0 r2 H Creek Member -rl o gray rippled and flaser-bedded sandstone containing l:: p.. burrows and trails, interbedded with medium-dark-gray .., ~ !:::I to dark-gray burrowed siltstone and shale with rare <tJ § fossils (euryptrids. Dipleurozoa. and Lingula). 00 H ~ III m o~ H m~ :1insi Member 300(91) Light-gray to medium~dark-gray and light-alive-gray I crossbedded and planar-bedded quartzite, conglomeratic quartzite, and quartz, chert. and shale-pebble conglomerate (pebbles as much as 2 in. long) and minor ~ locally mud-cracked argillite. !~~?! -l- ,-----~---~--------------~ ~ Pen Argyl 3,000 - Dark-gray to grayish-black thick-to-thin bedded, evenly 6,000 bedded claystone slate. rhythmically interbedded with ~ (915-1820) ....o quartzose slate or graywacke and carbonaceous slate. ~ ""'III Ramseyburg 2.BOO± P. o""' Medium-to-dark gray claystone slate alternating with ::>P. 1 p.. Member (850) light-to-medium-gray thin-to-thick bedded graywacke 00 z "=' J..I and graywacke siltstone which makes up about 20-30 «: !:::I ::J H <II .0 percent of the member. u Ul Qj !:l rl -r1 "=' .... I~ -0 J..I "r-I Bushkill 4,000+ Dark-to-medium gray thin-bedded claystone slate ~ :il Member (1220) containing thin beds of quartzose siltstone and I~ graywacke siltstone and carbonaceous slate. -J 1 IV 73 FIELD STUDIES OF NEW JERSEY GEOLOGY AND GUIDE TO FIELD TRIPS 75°15' o Contour interval 100 feet ••••••• Field-trip route .......... 3 Field-trip stops Figure 1 Index map of parts of northwestern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania showing the field-trip route, stops, and 7-1I2-minute­ quadrangle coverage. slip), and in which bedding was passive and merely Fot many years there has been controversy regarding documented deformation in the movement direction the relative intensities of Taconic and Appalachian (see Donath and Parker, 1964). Flexural slip is indicated (Alleghenian) deformation in eastern Pennsylvania. by bedding-plane slickensides and nearly constant or­ There has also been disagreement on the age and genesis thogonal bedding 'thickness in all parts of the fold, of slaty cleavage, particularly in the Martinsburg Form­ whereas in flexural-flow folding thickness perpendicular ation (see Epstein and Epstein, 1969, p. 163-170, for a to bedding need not be constant. Passive folds are summary). There is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Geology of the Enosburg Area, Vermont
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE ENOSBURG AREA, VERMONT By JOlIN G. DENNIS VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, State Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN No. 23 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 7 INTRODUCTION ...................... 7 Location ........................ 7 Geologic Setting .................... 9 Previous Work ..................... 10 Method of Study .................... 10 Acknowledgments .................... 10 Physiography ...................... 11 STRATIGRAPHY ...................... 12 Introduction ...................... 12 Pinnacle Formation ................... 14 Name and Distribution ................ 14 Graywacke ...................... 14 Underhill Facics ................... 16 Tibbit Hill Volcanics ................. 16 Age......................... 19 Underhill Formation ................... 19 Name and Distribution ................ 19 Fairfield Pond Member ................ 20 White Brook Member ................. 21 West Sutton Slate ................... 22 Bonsecours Facies ................... 23 Greenstones ..................... 24 Stratigraphic Relations of the Greenstones ........ 25 Cheshire Formation ................... 26 Name and Distribution ................ 26 Lithology ...................... 26 Age......................... 27 Bridgeman Hill Formation ................ 28 Name and Distribution ................ 28 Dunham Dolomite .................. 28 Rice Hill Member ................... 29 Oak Hill Slate (Parker Slate) .............. 29 Rugg Brook Dolomite (Scottsmore
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdonald Wayne 42.Pdf (7.426Mb)
    40 Ar/39 Ar AGES OF MUSCOVITE FROM THE WESTERN BLUE RIDGE AND TALLADEGA BELT, GEORGIA AND NORTH CAROLINA Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not include proprietary or classified information. _________________________________________ Wayne M. McDonald Certificate of Approval: ________________________________ ________________________________ Luke J. Marzen Willis E. Hames, Chair Associate Professor Professor Geology and Geography Geology and Geography ________________________ ________________________ Mark G. Steltenpohl George T. Flowers Professor Interim Dean Geology and Geography Graduate School 40 Ar/39 Ar AGES OF MUSCOVITE FROM THE WESTERN BLUE RIDGE AND TALLADEGA BELT, GEORGIA AND NORTH CAROLINA Wayne M. McDonald A thesis Submitted to the graduate faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama May 10, 2008 40 Ar/39 Ar AGES OF MUSCOVITE FROM THE WESTERN BLUE RIDGE AND TALLADEGA BELT, GEORGIA AND NORTH CAROLINA Wayne M. McDonald Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ________________________ Signature of Author ________________________ Date of Graduation iii VITAE Wayne M. McDonald, son of Dr. William J. McDonald and Virginia M. Leritz, was born January 25, 1974, in West Palm Beach, Florida. He graduated from Cardinal Newman High School in 1992. Subsequently, he attended Auburn University, Alabama, and graduated in December, 1998 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Klippe Served the Needs of Cult Worship, Sanctuary of Zeus, Mount Lykaion, Peloponnese, Greece
    Tectonic Klippe Served the Needs of Cult Worship, Sanctuary of Zeus, Mount Lykaion, Peloponnese, Greece George H. Davis, Dept. of Geosciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT Mount Lykaion is a rare, historical, cul- tural phenomenon, namely a Late Bronze Age through Hellenistic period (ca. 1500– 100 BC) mountaintop Zeus sanctuary, built upon an unusual tectonic feature, namely a thrust klippe. Recognition of this klippe and its physical character provides the framework for understanding the cou- pling between the archaeology and geology of the site. It appears that whenever there were new requirements in the physical/ cultural expansion of the sanctuary, the overall geologic characteristics of the thrust klippe proved to be perfectly adapt- able. The heart of this analysis consists of detailed geological mapping, detailed structural geologic analysis, and close cross-disciplinary engagement with archaeologists, classicists, and architects. INTRODUCTION Figure 1. Location of the Sanctuary of Zeus, Mount Lykaion, Peloponnese, Greece. In the second century AD, Pausanias authored an invaluable description of the residual worked blocks of built structures The critical geologic emphasis here is Sanctuary of Zeus, Mount Lykaion, and activity areas, including a hippodrome that Mount Lykaion is a thrust klippe. located at latitude 37° 23′ N, longitude and stadium used for athletic games in Thrusting was achieved during tectonic 22° 00′ E, in the Peloponnese (Fig. 1). ancient times (see Romano and Voyatzis, inversion of Jurassic to early Cenozoic Pausanias’ accounts were originally writ- 2014, 2015). Pindos Basin stratigraphy (Degnan and ten in Greek and are available in a number In 2004, I signed on as geologist for the Robertson, 2006; Doutsos et al., 1993; of translations and commentaries, includ- Mount Lykaion Excavation and Survey Skourlis and Doutsos, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Anja SCHORN & Franz NEUBAUER
    Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences Volume 104/2 22 - 46 Vienna 2011 Emplacement of an evaporitic mélange nappe in central Northern Calcareous Alps: evidence from the Moosegg klippe (Austria)_______________________________________________ Anja SCHORN*) & Franz NEUBAUER KEYWORDS thin-skinned tectonics deformation analysis Dept. Geography and Geology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria; sulphate mélange fold-thrust belt *) Corresponding author, [email protected] mylonite Abstract For the reconstruction of Alpine tectonics, the Permian to Lower Triassic Haselgebirge Formation of the Northern Calcareous Alps (NCA) (Austria) plays a key role in: (1) understanding the origin of Haselgebirge bearing nappes, (2) revealing tectonic processes not preserved in other units, and (3) in deciphering the mode of emplacement, namely gravity-driven or tectonic. With these aims in mind, we studied the sulphatic Haselgebirge exposed to the east of Golling, particularly the gypsum quarry Moosegg and its surroun- dings located in the central NCA. There, overlying the Lower Cretaceous Rossfeld Formation, the Haselgebirge Formation forms a tectonic klippe (Grubach klippe) preserved in a synform, which is cut along its northern edge by the ENE-trending high-angle normal Grubach fault juxtaposing Haselgebirge to the Upper Jurassic Oberalm Formation. According to our new data, the Haselgebirge bearing nappe was transported over the Lower Cretaceous Rossfeld Formation, which includes many clasts derived from the Hasel- gebirge Fm. and its exotic blocks deposited in front of the incoming nappe. The main Haselgebirge body contains foliated, massive and brecciated anhydrite and gypsum. A high variety of sulphatic fabrics is preserved within the Moosegg quarry and dominant gyp- sum/anhydrite bodies are tectonically mixed with subordinate decimetre- to meter-sized tectonic lenses of dark dolomite, dark-grey, green and red shales, pelagic limestones and marls, and abundant plutonic and volcanic rocks as well as rare metamorphic rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Gap Formed
    Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area How the Gap formed What is a water gap? Several words in the English language The Delaware Water Gap is justly famous for denote a “break” or “cleft” in the moun- its depth, width, and scenic beauty. The Gap tains. Chasm and notch are popular in New is a mile wide from New Jersey’s Mount England; pass and gorge in the South and Tammany (1,527 feet) to Pennsylvania’s West of the United States. Gap is especially Mount Minsi (1,463 feet.) The Gap is about common in this part of the country. 1,200 feet deep from the tops of these mountains to the surface of the river, which A gap or wind gap is a break or pass through at this point is 290 feet above sea level. The the mountains, in this case the Appalachian maximum depth of the river at the Gap is Mountains. A water gap is a pass that a river about 55 feet. runs through. How does a gap form? Geology is the study of the earth’s forma- Starting with Native American legend, there tion. Though the geologist’s time frame may have been many ideas about how the seem vast and remote, the results of Delaware Water Gap formed. One current geological processes are the mountains we theory explains the Gap through a series of hike on, the river we swim in, and the processes: continental shift (involving plate scenery we admire. tectonics), mountain building (orogeny), erosion, and the “capturing” of rivers and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician, in CH Shultz Ed, the Geology of Pennsylvania
    SCALE :ii! o 10 20 30 40 50 MI I 'i I' "i' , o 20 40 60 80 KM 41 40 ' EXPLANATION ~ l1li Ordovician rocks in subsurface Autochthonous OrdOllician rocks at surface Hamburg klippe Figure 5-1. Distribution of Ordovician sedimentary rocks In Pennsylvania west of the Martie Line (modified from Berg and others, 1980, and Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 1990). Part II. Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Tectonics CHAPTERS ORDOVICIAN ALLAN M. THOMPSON INTRODUCTION Department of Geology University of Delaware This chapter contains a summary of lithologic, Newark, DE 19716 facies, and temporal relationships of sedimentary rocks of Ordovician age in Pennsylvania west and northwest of the Martie Line (Figure 5-1). Ordovician sedimentary rocks occur only in the subsurface of northern and western Pennsylvania (Fettke, 1961; Wagner, 1966b) and crop out in cen­ tral and southeastern Pennsylvania (Figure 5-1). In central and south-central Pennsylvania, the Ridge and Valley belt contains a nearly complete Ordovician section. The Great Valley contains predominantly Lower and Middle Ordovician strata. The east-central part of the Great Valley contains allochthonous Cam­ brian to Middle Ordovician rocks of the Hamburg klippe; these rocks have been compared to the Ta­ conian allochthons of eastern New York and western New England (Rodgers, 1970; Lash and others, 1984). The Piedmont Lowland contains carbonates and shale of Early and possibly Middle Ordovician age (Gobn, 1978). Possibly coeval rocks of the Glenarm Super­ group, which occur southeast of the Martic Line (Fig­ ure 5-1), are penetratively deformed and variably metamorphosed (see Chapters 3A and 4). Some were assigned Early Ordovician ages by Berg, McInerney, and others (1986), but the evidence is equivocal.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution and Sequence of Thrusting in the High Himalayan, Tibetan-Tethys and Indus Suture Zones of Zanskar and Ladakh, Western Himalaya: Discussion
    Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 129 to 132, 1988 0191-8141/88 $03.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain Pergamon Press pie Structural evolution and sequence of thrusting in the High Himalayan, Tibetan-Tethys and Indus Suture zones of Zanskar and Ladakh, Western Himalaya: Discussion P. B. KELEMEN Department of Geological Sciences A J-20, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. I. REUBER Laboratoire de G~ologie Stratigraphique et Structurale, Universit~ de Poitiers, 40, Avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers C6dex, France and G. FUCHS Geologische Bundesanstalt, Rasumofskygasse 23, A-1031 Wien, Austria (Received 19 May 1987; accepted 29 July 1987) M. P. Searle's recent paper in the Journal of Structural Reuber 1986). In addition, Eocene strata have been Geology (Searle 1986) included a major departure from identified in the melange at the base of the klippe published structural interpretations of the Ladakh (Colchen et al. in press). Thus the final emplacement of Himalaya. The geologic history of Ladakh is a vital key the klippe must post-date Lower Eocene sedimentation to understanding the timing and sequence of events (at least as young as 55 Ma). during the Himalayan orogeny. Ophiolitic rocks and Thrusting of the klippe may have begun substantially island arc volcanics along the Indus Suture zone (Frank earlier than its final emplacement, especially if the possi- et al. 1977, and many others) constitute remnants of a bility of intra-oceanic faulting (Reuber 1986) is con- broad oceanic basin, formerly north of the Indian craton. sidered as part of the emplacement 'event'.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Sharon E
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Center for Applied Energy Research Publications 11-1990 Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Sharon E. Lewis Montana Tech James C. Hower University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub Part of the Geology Commons Repository Citation Lewis, Sharon E. and Hower, James C., "Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data" (1990). Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Publications. 11. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Applied Energy Research at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Applied Energy Research Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Implications of Thermal Events on Thrust Emplacement Sequence in the Appalachian Fold and Thrust Belt: Some New Vitrinite Reflectance Data Notes/Citation Information Published in The Journal of Geology, v. 98, no. 6, p. 927-942. © 1990 by The nivU ersity of Chicago. All rights reserved. The opc yright holder has granted the permission for posting the article here. Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1086/629462 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/caer_facpub/11 IMPLICATIONS OF THERMAL EVENTS ON THRUST EMPLACEMENT SEQUENCE IN THE APPALACHIAN FOLD AND THRUST BELT: SOME NEW VITRINITE REFLECTANCE DATAl SHARON E.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1972
    Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1972 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1394-A I*3P Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1972 By GEORGE V. COHEE and WILNA B. WRIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1394-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600312 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $1.00 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02450 CONTENTS Page Listing of nomenclatural changes _ _ Al Big Dome Formation and revised Tertiary stratigraphy in the Ray- San Manuel area, Arizona, by Medora H. Krieger, Henry R. Corn­ wall, and Norman G. Banks ______________________________ 54 Big Dome Formation ___________________________ 58 Relation to other formations __ _ ____ 61 Problems in correlating the San Manuel Formation and Whitetail Conglomerate _____ __ ____ _____________ 62 Knifley Sandstone and Cane Valley Limestone: Two new members of the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian) in south-central Kentucky, by Roy C. Kepferle and Richard Q. Lewis, Sr _____ 63 Measured sections ___________________________ 68 Metadiabase sills in Negaunee Iron-formation near National Mine, Mich., by George C. Simmons ___________________ 70 Tilden Lake sill ______________________________ 71 National Mine sill _____________________________ 71 Ash-flow stratigraphy and caldera structures in the San Juan volcanic field, southwestern Colorado, by T. A. Steven, P. W. Lipman, and J. C. Olson ___________________________________ 75 Fish Canyon (and La Garita) Tuff __________________ 77 Carpenter Ridge (and Bachelor Mountain) Tuff ___________ 78 Rat Creek and Nelson Mountain Tuffs ________________ 80 Bull Ridge Member of Mission Canyon Limestone, Beartooth Moun­ tains, southern Montana, by William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pander Society Newsletter
    Pander Society Newsletter S O E R C D I E N T A Y P 1 9 6 7 Compiled and edited by P.H. von Bitter and J. Burke PALAEOBIOLOGY DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY, ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM, TORONTO, ON, CANADA M5S 2C6 Number 41 May 2009 www.conodont.net Webmaster Mark Purnell, University of Leicester 2 Chief Panderer’s Remarks May 1, 2009 Dear Colleagues: It is again spring in southern Canada, that very positive time of year that allows us to forget our winter hibernation & the climatic hardships endured. It is also the time when Joan Burke and I get to harvest and see the results of our winter labours, as we integrate all the information & contributions sent in by you (Thank You) into a new and hopefully ever better Newsletter. Through the hard work of editor Jeffrey Over, Paleontographica Americana, vol. no. 62, has just been published to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of the Pander Society and the 150th Anniversary of the first conodont paper by Christian Pander in 1856; the titles and abstracts are here reproduced courtesy of the Paleontological Research Institution in Ithica, N.Y. Glen Merrill and others represented the Pander Society at a conference entitled “Geologic Problem Solving with Microfossils”, sponsored by NAMS, the North American Micropaleontology Section of SEPM, in Houston, Texas, March 15-18, 2009; the titles of papers that dealt with or mentioned conodonts, are included in this Newsletter. Although there have been no official Pander Society meetings since newsletter # 40, a year ago, there were undoubtedly many unofficial ones; many of these would have been helped by suitable refreshments, the latter likely being the reason I didn’t get to hear about the meetings.
    [Show full text]