Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina By Scott Southworth, Art Schultz, John N. Aleinikoff, and Arthur J. Merschat Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2997 Supersedes USGS Open-File Reports 03–381, 2004–1410, and 2005–1225 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Southworth, Scott, Schultz, Art, Aleinikoff, J.N., and Merschat, A.J., 2012, Geologic map of the Great Smoky Moun- tains National Park region, Tennessee and North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2997, one sheet, scale 1:100,000, and 54-p. pamphlet. (Supersedes USGS Open-File Reports 03–381, 2004–1410, and 2005–1225.) ISBN 978-1-4113-2403-9 Cover: Looking northeast toward Mount Le Conte, Tenn., from Clingmans Dome, Tenn.-N.C. iii Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Previous Investigations.................................................................................................................................1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................3 Field Mapping .......................................................................................................................................3 Digitization and Base Map ..................................................................................................................3 General Geologic Setting and Physiography ...........................................................................................3 Introduction............................................................................................................................................3 Central Blue Ridge Province ..............................................................................................................3 Highlands of the Western Blue Ridge Province ..............................................................................3 Foothills of the Western Blue Ridge Province .................................................................................4 Northern Foothills ........................................................................................................................4 Central Foothills............................................................................................................................5 Southern Foothills ........................................................................................................................5 Tennessee Valley of the Valley and Ridge Province .......................................................................5 Rocks of the Central Blue Ridge Province .................................................................................................5 Rocks of the Highlands of the Western Blue Ridge Province ................................................................5 Mesoproterozoic Basement Complex ...............................................................................................5 Paragneisses ................................................................................................................................7 Ultramafic Rocks .................................................................................................................8 Amphibolite ..........................................................................................................................9 Hornblende-Biotite Gneiss ..............................................................................................10 Orthogneisses.............................................................................................................................10 Migmatitic Biotite Gneiss ...............................................................................................10 Spring Creek Metagranitoid ...........................................................................................10 Metamonzogranite ..........................................................................................................11 Mylonitic Monzogranite ..................................................................................................11 Megacrystic Metagranite ..............................................................................................11 Metagranodiorite .............................................................................................................11 Biotitic Porphyritic Metagranitoid ................................................................................11 Neoproterozoic Ocoee Supergroup ................................................................................................12 Introduction.................................................................................................................................12 Snowbird Group .........................................................................................................................12 Introduction .......................................................................................................................12 Wading Branch Formation ..............................................................................................12 Longarm Quartzite ............................................................................................................12 Roaring Fork Sandstone ..................................................................................................12 Pigeon Siltstone ................................................................................................................13 Metcalf Phyllite .................................................................................................................13 Rich Butt Sandstone .........................................................................................................13 Great Smoky Group ...................................................................................................................14 Introduction .......................................................................................................................14 Elkmont Sandstone ...........................................................................................................14 iv Thunderhead Sandstone .................................................................................................14 Cades Sandstone ..............................................................................................................15 Anakeesta Formation .......................................................................................................15 Copperhill Formation .......................................................................................................16 Wehutty Formation ..........................................................................................................17 Grassy Branch Formation ................................................................................................17 Ammons Formation ...........................................................................................................17 Dean Formation .................................................................................................................17 Rocks of the Murphy Belt .........................................................................................................17 Tusquitee Quartzite and Nantahala Formation ............................................................17 Intrusive Rocks ....................................................................................................................................18 Metadiorite, Metadiabase, and Altered Rocks .....................................................................18 Pegmatite ....................................................................................................................................18 Trondhjemite ...............................................................................................................................19 Vein Quartz .................................................................................................................................19 Rocks of the Foothills of the Western Blue Ridge Province .................................................................19 Neoproterozoic Walden Creek Group .............................................................................................19
Recommended publications
  • 2010 Annual Report • Preserve
    Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park 2010 Annual Report • Preserve. Protect. Provide. Photos by Genia Stadler About This Publication Our 2010 Annual Report exists exclusively in digital format, available on our website at www.FriendsOfTheSmokies.org. In order to further the impact of our donors’ resources for the park’s benefit we chose to publish this report online. If you would like a paper copy, you may print it from home on your computer, or you may request a copy to be mailed to you from our office (800-845-5665). We are committed to conserving natural resources in and around Great Smoky Mountains National Park! The images used on the front and back covers are If your soul can belong to provided through the generosity, time, and talent of a place, mine belongs here. Genia Stadler of Sevierville, Tennessee. Genia Stadler When asked to describe herself and her love for the Smokies, she said, “I was born in Alabama, but Tennessee always felt like home to me. My love for the Smokies started as a small child. My daddy brought me here each summer before he passed away. I was 9 when he died, and by then I had fallen in love with the Smokies. My husband (Gary) and I had the chance to build a cabin and move here in 2002, so we jumped at the chance. Since then, we’ve been exploring the park as often as we can. We’ve probably hiked over 300 miles of the park’s trails (many repeats), and I’m trying to pass my love for this place on to my two children and two grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule
    May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule *ALL SCHEDULES SUBJECT TO CHANGE* The FARMERS’ MARKET, WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS/PRESENTATIONS and OUTDOOR EXCURSION SIGN– UPS will take place at: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge 2986 Teaster Lane Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 Wilderness Wildlife Week’s 2nd Appalachian Homecoming featuring storytelling, music, antique tractor show, non–profit picnic fundraiser and more will begin at 5 PM on Friday, May 12th at: Patriot Park 186 Old Mill Avenue Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 LeConte Center Hours Information Desk: Open Tuesday to Thursday, from 7 AM – 9 PM Information Desk: Open Friday, from 7 AM – 4:30 PM Information Desk: Open Saturday, from 7 AM – 8 PM Farmers’ Market Hours: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8:30 AM – 2:30 PM Pre–registration Desk: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8 AM – 3 PM Pre–registration for LIMITED! Sessions will take the morning of each day for that day’s sessions Vendor/Exhibit Hall: Open daily from 9 AM – 6 PM in LeConte Exhibit Hall *Note: Vendor Hall will close at 4 PM on Friday, May 12. Photography Exhibit opens Tuesday, May 9 from 2 PM to 6 PM. Hours for Wednesday, May 10 until Saturday, May 13 from 9 AM until 6 PM. Photography Exhibit Special Hours: Friday, May 12 from 9 AM until 4 PM. Education Stations located in LeConte Hall. 1 Tuesday, May 9 9 AM: Tuesday Outdoor Excursion Sign-ups – Greenbrier Hall A 9 – 10 AM: NEW! Guiding in the National Parks and Wilderness Areas of the United States: Chris Hoge – North 1 9 – 11 AM: NEW! LIMITED! Design Your Own Bird Greeting Cards: Louise Bales – North 3B Limit 10 Participants must preregister at Registration Table for all LIMITED! sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations Of
    geosciences Article Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations of Montmorillonitic Sands in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation: Implications for Mississippi Embayment Paleodrainage Patterns and Paleogeography Jennifer N. Gifford 1,*, Elizabeth J. Vitale 1, Brian F. Platt 1 , David H. Malone 2 and Inoka H. Widanagamage 1 1 Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA; [email protected] (E.J.V.); [email protected] (B.F.P.); [email protected] (I.H.W.) 2 Department of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: jngiff[email protected]; Tel.: +1-(662)-915-2079 Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 15 February 2020; Published: 22 February 2020 Abstract: We provide new detrital zircon evidence to support a Maastrichtian age for the establishment of the present-day Mississippi River drainage system. Fieldwork conducted in Pontotoc County,Mississippi, targeted two sites containing montmorillonitic sand in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation. U-Pb detrital zircon (DZ) ages from these sands (n = 649) ranged from Mesoarchean (~2870 Ma) to Pennsylvanian (~305 Ma) and contained ~91% Appalachian-derived grains, including Appalachian–Ouachita, Gondwanan Terranes, and Grenville source terranes. Other minor source regions include the Mid-Continent Granite–Rhyolite Province, Yavapai–Mazatzal, Trans-Hudson/Penokean, and Superior. This indicates that sediment sourced from the Appalachian Foreland Basin (with very minor input from a northern or northwestern source) was being routed through the Mississippi Embayment (MSE) in the Maastrichtian. We recognize six lithofacies in the field areas interpreted as barrier island to shelf environments. Statistically significant differences between DZ populations and clay mineralogy from both sites indicate that two distinct fluvial systems emptied into a shared back-barrier setting, which experienced volcanic ash input.
    [Show full text]
  • 129 the Use of Joint Patterns for Understanding The
    129 THE USE OF JOINT PATTERNS FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ALLEGHANIAN OROGENY IN THE UPPER DEVONIAN APPALACHIAN BASIN, FINGER LAKES DISTRICT, NEW YORK TERRY ENGELDER Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Abundantevidence (deformed fo ssils) for layer parallel shortening in western New York indicates the extent to which the Alleghanian Orogeny affected the Appalachian Plateau (Engelder and Engelder, 1977). In addition to low amplitude ( 100 m) long wave length ( 15 km) folds the Upper Devonian sediments of western New York contain many< mesoscopic-scale structures< including joints that can be systematically related to the Alleghanian Orogeny. Based on the nonorthogonality of cleavage and joints, the Alleghanian Orogeny in the Finger Lakes District of New York consists of at least two phases which Geiser and Engelder (1983) correlate with folding and cross-cutting cleavages in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge. To the southeast of the Finger Lakes District the earlier Lackawanna Phase is manifested by formation of the Lackawanna syncline and Green Pond outlier and the development of a northeast-striking disjunctive cleavage within the Appalachian Valley and Ridge mainly fromthe Kingston Arch of the Hudson Valley southwestward beyond Port Jervis, Pennsylvania (Fig. 1). Within the Finger Lakes Distric� New York, a Lackawanna Phase cleavage is absent; and one fm ds instead a cross-fold joint set which is consistent in orientation with a Lackawanna Phase compression. In bedded siltstone-shale sequences (i.e. the Genesee Group) this cross-fold joint set favors development in the siltstones 1# 2#). Main Phase (stops and The is seen as the refolding of the Lackawanna syncline and Green Pond outlier, as well as the development of the major folds in central Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Smoky Mountains National Park THIRTY YEARS of AMERICAN LANDSCAPES
    Great Smoky Mountains National Park THIRTY YEARS OF AMERICAN LANDSCAPES Richard Mack Fo r e w o r d b y S t e v e K e m p Great Smoky Mountains National Park THIRTY YEARS OF AMERICAN LANDSCAPES Richard Mack Fo r e w o r d b y S t e v e K e m p © 2009 Quiet Light Publishing Evanston, Illinois 60201 Tel: 847-864-4911 Web: www.quietlightpublishing.com Email: [email protected] Photographs © 2009 by Richard Mack Foreword © 2009 Steve Kemp Map Courtesy of the National Park Service, Harpers Ferry Harvey Broome quote from "Out Under the Sky of the Great Smokies" © 2001 courtesy The Wilderness Society. Great Smoky Mountains National Park Design: Richard Mack & Rich Nickel THIRTY YEARS OF AMERICAN LANDSCAPES Printed by CS Graphics PTE Ltd, Singapore All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means - graphic, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, taping of information on storage and retrieval systems - without the prior written permission from the publisher. The copyright on each photograph in this book belongs to the photographer, and no reproductions of the Richard Mack photographic images contained herein may be made without the express permission of the photographer. For information on fine art prints contact the photographer at www.mackphoto.com. Fo r e w o r d b y S t e v e K e m p First Edition 10 Digit ISBN: 0-9753954-2-4 13 Digit ISBN: 978-0-9753954-2-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2009921091 Distributed by Quiet Light
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Geosciences Theses Department of Geosciences 4-20-2009 Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States Usha Kharel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/geosciences_theses Part of the Geography Commons, and the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Kharel, Usha, "Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2009. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/geosciences_theses/15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geosciences at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF STREAM RUNOFF TRENDS IN THE BLUE RIDGE AND PIEDMONT OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by USHA KHAREL Under the Direction of Seth Rose ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to examine the temporal trends of three monthly variables: stream runoff, rainfall and air temperature and to find out if any correlation exists between rainfall and stream runoff in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont provinces of the southeast United States. Trend significance was determined using the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test on a monthly and annual basis. GIS analysis was used to find and integrate the urban and non-urban stream gauging, rainfall and temperature stations in the study area. The Mann-Kendall test showed a statistically insignificant temporal trend for all three variables. The correlation of 0.4 was observed for runoff and rainfall, which showed that these two parameters are moderately correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1998 Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP - Cades Cove Subdistrict Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP - Cades Cove Subdistrict Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Camp Louise in the Settlement House Movement of Baltimore’S Jewish Community
    1 “Fresh Air and Cheer”: The Origins of Camp Louise in the Settlement House Movement of Baltimore’s Jewish Community by Barry Kessler One day in 1921, three Baltimoreans set out to visit a potential site for a summer retreat that would serve the city’s immigrant Jewish women. Ida Sharogrodsky, a social worker, and Lillie Straus, a philanthropist, had pleaded with Lillie’s husband, Aaron, one of Baltimore’s wealthiest merchants, to consider purchasing an old hotel in the Catoctin Mountains which they envisioned as an extension of the social service work they were doing in East Baltimore. Midway on the seventy‐mile trip, Aaron Straus seized on the pretext of a storm to turn back, but the ladies were undeterred, and once they arrived, the enchanting view of forested hills and fertile valleys overcame his reluctance. 1 The story of the three founders’ trip has served as the origin myth of Camp Louise, which matured from a vacation spot for working women to a traditional Jewish girls’ summer camp and is still operating almost a hundred years later. It’s a charming tale, retold over generations by camp alumnae and counselors, staff and community leaders. But the actual history of how Camp Louise emerged from Baltimore’s Progressive era efforts to aid, acculturate, and assimilate immigrants is more complex and in many ways more interesting. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Baltimore faced the twin pressures of industrialization and immigration, which gave rise to enormous challenges as well as critical opportunities for the city, and for its Jewish community in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • May 8–12, 2018
    May 8–12, 2018 Event Program Schedule – Web Edition *NOTE 1: All schedules subject to change. *NOTE 2: For all outdoor excursions including hikes, bus trips and activities, please review the specific Outdoor Excursions Schedule for sign-ups and refer to the Outdoor Excursions Procedures and Rules. Tuesday, May 8 8 AM: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge Main Entrance opens 9 – 10 AM: NEW! HERITAGE! Frontier Life: Women’s Role in Western Frontier Living in North Carolina (present-day East Tennessee) – Overmountain Victory Trail Association – Greenbriar Hall A 9 – 4 PM: Pre–registration for Tuesday, May 8 LIMITED Sessions – Preregistration Table 9:30 – 10:30 AM: Wildflowers of the Smokies – Jack Carman – North 3A 9:30 – 11:30 AM: All About Spin Fishing Great Smoky Mountains National Park Area Stocked Trout Streams, As Well As Local Smallmouth – Greg Ward – North 3B Join Greg as he discusses spin fishing techniques while relating his lifetime of fishing knowledge. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! All About Firewise in Pigeon Forge – Kevin Nunn and Matt Lovitt – North 1B Join Pigeon Forge Firefighters Kevin and Matt with the Tennessee Division of Forestry as they discuss the historical perspective of wildfires in East Tennessee, wildfire prevention in Pigeon Forge and recommendations relating to keeping your homes safe through Firewise practices. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! Wilderness Wildlife Week 48 Hour Film Race Registration and Kickoff – Greenbriar Hall C 10 – 6 PM: Wilderness Wildlife Week Digital Display Photography Contest and Special Displays opens – North 1A 10
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS FAMILY CAMP! July 10-15, 2017 SCHEDULE of EVENTS
    GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS FAMILY CAMP! July 10-15, 2017 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Monday WELCOME! PM 3:00-5:00 Arrival, registration and move in to the dorm. EVE 5:45 Supper 6:45 Welcome & Orientation & Sign Up for Activities – meet in @ Cove Room 8:00 Campfire & Intro to Skit Night – meet @ Council House Snack available afterward in the Dining Hall. Tuesday NATURE CLUBS AM 7:30 Morning Yoga Meet @ Pavilion 8:00 Breakfast KEY: (R) Rambler: Includes a hiking distance of roughly a half mile. (E) Explorer: Perhaps as long as a mile hiking distance or slightly longer. (T) Trekker: As many as two miles hiking distance and/or includes significant elevation change. 9:00-11:45 1. It’s in the Bag (R) 2. Wizard Masters of Decomposition (E) 3. Firetender Academy (R) 4. Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (R) 5. Master Trackers (E) PM 12:30 Lunch 1:30-4:15 1. Sand Painting Mandalas (R) 2. Creek Crawlin’ Rock Hoppers (E) 3. Trophic Champions (E) 4. Becoming a Bug-ologist (R) 5. Afternoon Trek: Marcs/Lumber Ridge (T) 1:30 – thru OVERNIGHT BACKPACK TRIP – This one-of-a-kind experience will introduce Weds. morning you to the world of backpacking where you get to carry everything you need for one night in the wilderness on your back. We’ll supply backpacks and most gear. You’ll need to bring your own sleeping bag. We’ll spend the afternoon packing our gear before a journey of two miles. (Is it uphill? Of course! You’re in the mountains!) The return trip will be Wednesday morning following breakfast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Arts Project - 1988
    The Lost Arts Project - 1988 The Cherokee National Historical Society, Inc. and the Cherokee Nation partnered in 1988 to create the Lost Arts Program focusing on the preservation and revival of cultural arts. A new designation was created for Master Craftsmen who not only mastered their art, but passed their knowledge on to the next generation. Stated in the original 1988 brochure: “The Cherokee people are at a very important time in history and at a crucial point in making provisions for their future identity as a distinct people. The Lost Arts project is concerned with the preservation and revival of Cherokee cultural practices that any be lost in the passage from one generation to another. The project is concerned with capturing the knowledge, techniques, individual commitment available to us and heritage received from Cherokee folk artists and developing educational and cultural preservation programs based on their knowledge and experience.” Artists had to be Cherokee and nominated by at least two people in the community. When selected, they were designated as “Living National Treasures.” 24 1 Do you know these Treasures? Lyman Vann - 1988 Bow Making Mattie Drum - 1990 Weaving Rogers McLemore - 1990 Weaving Hester Guess - 1990 Weaving Sally Lacy - 1990 Weaving Stella Livers - 1990 Basketry Eva Smith - 1991 Turtle Shell Shackles Betty Garner - 1993 Basketry Vivian Leaf Bush -1993 Turtle Shell Shackles David Neugin - 1994 Bow Making Vivian Elaine Waytula - 1995 Basketry Richard Rowe 1996 Carving Lee Foreman - 1999 Marble Making Original Lost Arts Program Exhibit Flyer- 1988 Mildred Justice Ketcher - 1999 Basketry Albert Wofford - 1999 Gig Making/Carving Willie Jumper - 2001 Stickball Sticks Sam Lee Still - 2002 Carving Linda Mouse-Hansen - 2002 Basketry Unfortunately, we have not been able to locate information, pictures or examples of art from the following Treasures.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Clingmans Dome, North Carolina
    CLINGMANS DOME QUADRANGLE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ! 4200 F 4400 5000 4400 Grassy 4800 NORTH CAROLINA-TENNESSEE 4200 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Beech Patch Anakeesta Ridge APPALACHIAN NATIONAL Mount 7.5-MINUTE SERIES 4800 4600 83°30' Flats 27'30" 25' SCENIC TRAIL 83°22'30" Sugarland 4600 4800 Chimney Tops Trail 4600 5200 Ambler 274000mE Mountain Trail 4800 275 276 2 720000 FEET (TN) 277 2 2 2 2 283 284 700 000 FEET (NC) 35°37'30" 78 79 80 82 35°37'30" 4000 4400 4800 Sugarland Mountain 4800 5200 5000 4000 Sugarland Mountain Trail Mount Ambler 39 000m 5000 S w 45 N O 5200 710 000 C 5000 ̶ ¤£441 IE R e Rough V a Cre 4200 4800 l SE O ek ai C t FEET (NC) Tr Rough C 4200 5400 r N a 4800 i r T I H l A 4600 nic SW r 4600 e e B 4800 Sc 4200 5200 al 5600 i 4000 h c N n f t 4400 D io e 5200 A t a O a r 4600 N R N 5400 P E P 5000 4400 WFO GA n Indian s UND a C s hi 5800 il c a r 4200 a a 4600 Grave r al Tr G 4400 pp k 5600 A e Flats 4800 re 4600 C 5200 r 5000 e 39 4800 4600 if 44 Mount Mingus 5400 e 4800 ̶ H t t 5000 4600 5000 5200 a 4800 e 4400 w S 3944 5000 Mingus Lead 5000 5400 4200 hian National S Newfound Gap APPALACHIAN NATIONAL 4000 Sweet Ridge palac cenic Ap Tra 4400 5400 il SCENIC TRAIL 4600 Road Prong Trail F! M Sweet Ridge i Sweat Heifer Cr n 4400 5200 Road Prong Indian Gap n 4400 ! i F e 4800 B 5400 4800 4600 4800 a Luftee Jack Bradley Br 5000 l Peruvian Br4600 39 l l Beec r 43 5200 h B Gap Flats r Pro B 4200 ng r C 5200 4000 4400 n y 4200 e e NEW 4200 d k 39 D FO s 4000 Sugarland Mountain A U A 43 4600 N u O 5000 Mount Weaver D G
    [Show full text]