Screening for Resistance to Smut Disease of Twenty Seven Sugarcane Varieties ﻣﺳﺢ ﻣﻘﺎوﻣﺔ ﻣرض اﻟﺳوﯾد ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﻌﺔ وﻋﺷرون ﺻﻧف ﻣن ﻗﺻب اﻟﺳﻛر

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Screening for Resistance to Smut Disease of Twenty Seven Sugarcane Varieties ﻣﺳﺢ ﻣﻘﺎوﻣﺔ ﻣرض اﻟﺳوﯾد ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﻌﺔ وﻋﺷرون ﺻﻧف ﻣن ﻗﺻب اﻟﺳﻛر Sudan University of Science and Technology College of Graduate Studies Screening for Resistance to Smut Disease of Twenty Seven Sugarcane Varieties ﻣﺳﺢ ﻣﻘﺎوﻣﺔ ﻣرض اﻟﺳوﯾد ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﻌﺔ وﻋﺷرون ﺻﻧف ﻣن ﻗﺻب اﻟﺳﻛر A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.Sc. Degree in Plant Protection By: Mohammed Ali Ahmed Hassin Sudan University of Science and Technology Department of Plant Protection B.Sc. Agric. (Honors), 2012. Supervisor: Dr. Ibrahim Saeed Mohamed Department of Plant Protection Shambat-College of Agricultural Studies Sudan University of Science and Technology 2016 اﻵﯾﺔ ﻗﺎل ﺗﻌﺎﱄ: وَﻫُﻮ َ اﻟﱠﺬِي أَﻧـْﺰَلَ ﻣِﻦَ اﻟﺴﱠﻤﺎءِ (ﻣﺎءً ﻓَﺄَﺧْﺮَﺟْ ﻨﺎ ﺑِﻪِ ﻧَﺒﺎتَ ﻛُﻞﱢ ﺷَﻲ ْ ءٍ ﻓَﺄَﺧْﺮَﺟْ ﻨﺎ ﻣِﻨْﻪُ ﺧَﻀِﺮً ا ﳔُْﺮِجُ ﻣِﻨْﻪُ ﺣَ ﺒﺎ ﻣُﱰَ اﻛِﺒًﺎ وَﻣِﻦَ اﻟﻨﱠﺨْﻞِ ﻣِﻦْ ﻃَﻠْﻌِﻬﺎ ﻗِﻨْﻮانٌ داﻧِﻴ َ ﺔٌ وَﺟَﻨﱠﺎتٍ ﻣِﻦْ أَﻋْﻨﺎبٍ وَ اﻟﺰﱠﻳـْﺘُﻮنَ وَ اﻟﺮﱡﻣﱠﺎنَ ﻣُﺸْﺘَﺒِﻬً ﺎ وَﻏَﻴـْﺮَ ﻣُﺘَﺸﺎﺑِﻪٍ اﻧْﻈُﺮُوا إِﱃ ﲦََﺮِﻩِ إِذا أَﲦَْﺮ َ وَ ﻳـَ ﻨْﻌِﻪِ إِنﱠ ﰲِ ذﻟِﻜُﻢ ْ ﻵَ ﻳﺎتٍ ﻟِﻘَﻮ ْ مٍ ﻳـُﺆْﻣِ ﻨُﻮنَ ((99)) ﺻﺪق اﷲ اﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺳﻮرة اﻷﻧﻌﺎم((99)) I Dedication To my mother To my father To my sisters and brothers To my family To my teachers To my colleagues and friends With love and respect. Mohammed II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS All thanks are due to Almighty Allah (SWT) who gave me health and strength, and helped me tremendously to produce this work. I would like to express my thanks to my supervisor Dr. Ibrahim Saeed Mohamed College of Agricultural studies, Sudan University of science and technology, who devoted most of his time to teach us on various disciplines of scientific research. Thanks are also extended to my dear teachers Khalid Bukhari for their continuous and unlimited helps during this study. From whose blessed hand the statistical analyses were produced. Also Special Thanks are due to my colleagues at the M.Sc. who helped me during the experiments. Grateful thanks are due to all the staff of the Department of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Studies, Sudan University of Science and Technology. III List of Contents Title Page No. I.....................................................................................................................اﻵﯾﺔ Dedication ....................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................. III List of Contents .............................................................................................. IV List of Tables ................................................................................................. VI List of Figures .............................................................................................. VII List of Plates ............................................................................................... VIII Abstract .......................................................................................................... IX X ....................................................................................................... ﻣﻠﺨﺺ اﻟﺒﺤﺚ CHAPTER ONE .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................. 4 LITREATURE REVIEW ................................................................................. 4 2.1. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) .................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Description of the crop ......................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Sugarcane production worldwide ......................................................... 6 2.1.3 Yield and quality .................................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Nutritional value of Sugarcane: ............................................................ 7 2.2 Sugar cane production in Sudan .............................................................. 7 2.2.1 Constraints of sugar cane production .................................................... 8 2.2 Sugarcane smut disease ........................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Classification of sugarcane smut pathogen {Sporisorium scitamineum (Syd.) M. Piepenbr; Stoll, M. & Oberw, 2002} ........................................... 10 2.3.2Symptoms ........................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 The pathogen: ..................................................................................... 12 2.3.4 Variability .......................................................................................... 13 2.3.5 Disease cycle ...................................................................................... 16 IV 2.3.6 Dissemination of spores ..................................................................... 17 2.3.7 Environment ....................................................................................... 18 2.3.8 Economic Impact .............................................................................. 18 2.3.9 Prevention and Control ....................................................................... 19 CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................ 21 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................... 21 3.1. Location of study: ................................................................................ 21 3.2. Test varieties ........................................................................................ 21 3.3. Collection and maintenance of S. scitamineum inoculum ..................... 21 3.4. Seedbed preparation and planting materials .......................................... 22 3.5. Preparation of sugarcane differentials: .................................................. 22 3.6. Inoculation protocol/ methods and field design: ................................... 22 3.6.1. Dip methods (DM): ........................................................................... 22 3.6.2 Natural spreading method (NSM): ...................................................... 23 3.7. Disease incidence and assessment of resistance .................................... 23 3.8. Data collection ..................................................................................... 23 3.9. Statistical analysis ................................................................................ 24 3.10. Evaluation of sugarcane germplasm against smut: .............................. 24 CHAPTER FOUR .......................................................................................... 25 RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Reaction of varieties inoculated with natural infection method .............. 25 4.2 Reaction of varieties to smut inoculated with dip inoculation method ... 29 CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................ 35 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 35 Conclusions and Recommendation ................................................................. 37 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 37 Recommendation ........................................................................................ 38 References .................................................................................................. 39 Appendices..................................................................................................... 46 V List of Tables Title Page No. Table 1: Numerical rating system for sugarcane smut according to (Satya Vir Beniwal, 1978)*............................................................................... 24 Table 2: Rating varieties of smut disease reactions to smut inoculated with natural infection method in plant cane (PC) and in first ratoon (R1). ............................................................................................................... 26 Table 3: Rating varieties of smut disease reactions to smut inoculated with dipping infection method in plant cane PC and in first ratoon R1 ... 30 Table 4: Percentage of stool infection showed the correlation between the natural infection methods and dipping infection methods in plant cane. 33 VI List of Figures Title Page No. Figure 1: Percentage of smut stool infection in plant cane (PC) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with natural infection method ................. 27 Figure 2: Percentage of smut stool infection in first ratoon (R1) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with natural infection methods ............... 28 Figure 3: Percentage of smut stool infection in plant cane (PC) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with dip infection methods. .................... 31 Figure 4: Percentage of smut stool infection in fist ratoon (R1) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with dip infection methods ..................... 32 Figure 5: Percentage of smut stool infection in plant cane (PC) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with natural infection methods ............... 34 Figure 6: Percentage of smut stool infection in plant cane (PC) of sugarcane varieties inoculated with dip infection methods ..................... 34 VII List
Recommended publications
  • Biotechnology Volume 13 Number 51, 17 December, 2014 ISSN 1684-5315
    African Journal of Biotechnology Volume 13 Number 51, 17 December, 2014 ISSN 1684-5315 ABOUT AJB The African Journal of Biotechnology (AJB) (ISSN 1684-5315) is published weekly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. African Journal of Biotechnology (AJB), a new broad-based journal, is an open access journal that was founded on two key tenets: To publish the most exciting research in all areas of applied biochemistry, industrial microbiology, molecular biology, genomics and proteomics, food and agricultural technologies, and metabolic engineering. Secondly, to provide the most rapid turn-around time possible for reviewing and publishing, and to disseminate the articles freely for teaching and reference purposes. All articles published in AJB are peer- reviewed. Submission of Manuscript Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript files should be given the last name of the first author Click here to Submit manuscripts online If you have any difficulty using the online submission system, kindly submit via this email [email protected]. With questions or concerns, please contact the Editorial Office at [email protected]. Editor-In-Chief Associate Editors George Nkem Ude, Ph.D Prof. Dr. AE Aboulata Plant Breeder & Molecular Biologist Plant Path. Res. Inst., ARC, POBox 12619, Giza, Egypt Department of Natural Sciences 30 D, El-Karama St., Alf Maskan, P.O. Box 1567, Crawford Building, Rm 003A Ain Shams, Cairo, Bowie State University Egypt 14000 Jericho Park Road Bowie, MD 20715, USA Dr. S.K Das Department of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, University of Fukui, Japan Editor Prof. Okoh, A. I. N.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Yield Loss in Sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.) Due to Effects of Smut Disease in Some Selected Sugarcane Genotypes Under Sudan Conditions
    Journal Of Agricultural Research ISSN: 2455-7668 ESTIMATION OF YIELD LOSS IN SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM SPP.) DUE TO EFFECTS OF SMUT DISEASE IN SOME SELECTED SUGARCANE GENOTYPES UNDER SUDAN CONDITIONS Marchelo-d’Ragga, P.W. 1* 1 * Author, Philip Wani Marchelo- d’Ragga, Associate Professor, Dept. of Agricultural Sciences, College of Natural Recourses and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, P.O. Box 82 Juba, Republic of South Sudan. [email protected]; Cell phone: +211 (0) 92 823 1001; (0) 95 680 2458; (0) 92 000 8616 ABSTRACT This study was conducted at Sugarcane Research Centre, Guneid, (Latitude 150 N, longitude 330 E) in 2008/2009 cropping season. The objective was to estimate the amounts of losses (field and factory) incurred on sugarcane by the effects of smut disease of sugarcane caused by Ustilago scitaminea (Syd.). Replicated cane stalk samples were taken from each of three cane categories namely, whip-bearing canes from diseased stools (WBC-DS), apparently healthy looking canes from diseased stools (AHC-DS) and healthy canes from healthy stools (HC-HS) from some selected sugarcane genotypes. Results showed significant reductions of 5%, 4%, 5% and 40% for brix, sucrose content (pol %), estimated recoverable sugar (ERS) and stalk weight at (P=0.05), respectively in comparison to healthy canes. Fibre content of whip bearing cane stalks was significantly higher by 7% to that of HC-HS and AHC-DS; this is detrimental and responsible for losses in ERS. Moisture content and purity were however, found to be unaffected by the disease. This study has showed that, smut disease incurs losses to most cane yield parameters both in the field and factory.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Variation of Sporisorium Scitamineum in Mainland China Revealed by RAPD and SRAP Markers
    Molecular Variation of Sporisorium scitamineum in Mainland China Revealed by RAPD and SRAP Markers Y. Que, L. Xu, J. Lin, and R. Chen, Key Lab of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian Province, China; and M. P. Grisham, United States Department of Agriculture–Agricul- tural Research Service, Sugarcane Research Unit, Houma, LA 70360 Abstract Que, Y., Xu, L., Lin, J., Chen, R., and Grisham, M. P. 2012. Molecular variation of Sporisorium scitamineum in mainland China revealed by RAPD and SRAP markers. Plant Dis. 96:1519-1525. Sugarcane smut caused by Sporisorium scitamineum occurs world- showed that, whereas the molecular variation of S. scitamineum was wide, causing serious losses in sugar yield and quality. To study the associated with geographic origin, there was no evidence of co-evolu- molecular variation of S. scitamineum, 23 S. scitamineum isolates col- tion between sugarcane and the pathogen. The results of RAPD, SRAP, lected from the six primary sugarcane production areas in mainland or RAPD-SRAP combined analysis also did not provide any infor- China (Guangxi, Yunnan, Guangdong, Hainan, Fujian, and Jiangxi mation about race differentiation of S. scitamineum. This suggests that provinces) were assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA the mixture of spores from sori collected from different areas should be (RAPD) and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) mark- used in artificial inoculations for resistance breeding and selection. ers. The results of RAPD, SRAP, and RAPD-SRAP combined analysis Sugarcane smut, caused by Sporisorium scitamineum (Basi- The researchers concluded from the results that the fungus mi- onym: Ustilago scitaminea) (25,33), occurs worldwide and is one grated from Asia to other continents, probably through movement of the most prevalent fungal diseases of sugarcane in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Iodiversity of Australian Smut Fungi
    Fungal Diversity iodiversity of Australian smut fungi R.G. Shivas'* and K. Vanky2 'Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Plant Pathology Herbarium, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia 2 Herbarium Ustilaginales Vanky, Gabriel-Biel-Str. 5, D-72076 Tiibingen, Germany Shivas, R.G. and Vanky, K. (2003). Biodiversity of Australian smut fungi. Fungal Diversity 13 :137-152. There are about 250 species of smut fungi known from Australia of which 95 are endemic. Fourteen of these endemic species were first collected in the period culminating with the publication of Daniel McAlpine's revision of Australian smut fungi in 1910. Of the 68 species treated by McAlpine, 10 were considered to be endemic to Australia at that time. Only 23 of the species treated by McAlpine have names that are currently accepted. During the following eighty years until 1990, a further 31 endemic species were collected and just 11 of these were named and described in that period. Since 1990, 50 further species of endemic smut fungi have been collected and named in Australia. There are 115 species that are restricted to either Australia or to Australia and the neighbouring countries of Indonesia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and the Philippines . These 115 endemic species occur in 24 genera, namely Anthracoidea (1 species), Bauerago (1), Cintractia (3), Dermatosorus (1), Entyloma (3), Farysporium (1), Fulvisporium (1), Heterotolyposporium (1), Lundquistia (1), Macalpinomyces (4), Microbotryum (2), Moreaua (20), Pseudotracya (1), Restiosporium (5), Sporisorium (26), Thecaphora (2), Tilletia (12), Tolyposporella (1), Tranzscheliella (1), Urocystis (2), Ustanciosporium (1), Ustilago (22), Websdanea (1) and Yelsemia (2). About a half of these local and regional endemic species occur on grasses and a quarter on sedges.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Sugarcane Smut
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory - Invasive Fungi Fact Sheets Asian sugarcane smut - Sporisorium sacchari Sporisorium sacchari is one of several Asian species parasitizing only the flowers of species of Saccharum, thus causing much less damage to the plants than does the more widespread sugarcane smut that infects buds and reduces growth of shoots. Although windborne, and probably contaminating seeds, S. sacchari spreads less well with the vegetatively propagated cane plants. Nevertheless, its effects on other possible hosts could pose a threat to native or agricultural plants if it were introduced. Sporisorium sacchari (Rabenh.) Vánky 1985 Sori (spore-containing bodies) in swollen ovaries, ovoid to short cylindrical, 3-5 mm long, partly hidden by parts of floret; spore masses covered by a pale brown membrane (peridium) rupturing irregularly, usually at apex, exposing blackish-brown, semi-agglutinated to powdery masses surrounding a short, tapering columella of plant and fungus tissue. Spores initially aggregated in very loose spore balls, 25-30 µm diam, separating later, globose, subglobose, or ovoid to slightly irregular, 7-10 x 7-11(-12) µm, yellowish-brown; wall ca. 0.8 µm thick, finely and densely echinulate (spiny), spore profile appearing smooth or near smooth. Spore germination produces 4-celled basidium bearing fusiform basidiospores. The fungus replaces the ovary and seed in the individual florets with small bodies containing the compacted to powdery, dark spore balls. Dissemination of the spores leaves the erect pale tapering columella in the center of the floret. See Mundkur, 1942; Vanky, 2007. Host range: Species of Saccharum (Poaceae) Geographic distribution: Widespread in Asia from India to Japan NOTES Vanky (1985, 1987) transferred this species to the genus Sporisorium because of its grass host, agreeing with Langdon and Fullerton (1978) that the genus Sphacelotheca is restricted to smuts on dicotyledonous plants in the Polygonaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Loose Kernel Smut Caused by Sporisorium Cruentum Onrhizomes
    Journal of Plant Protection Research ISSN 1427-4337 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Eff ects of loose kernel smut caused by Sporisorium cruentum onrhizomes of Sorghum halepense Marta Monica Astiz Gassó1*, Marcelo Lovisolo2, Analia Perelló3 1 Santa Catalina Phytotechnical Institute, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences UNLP Calle 60 y 119 (1900) La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2 Morphologic Botany, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences – National University Lomas de Zamora. Ruta Nº 4, km 2 (1836) Llavallol, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3 Phytopathology, CIDEFI, FCAyF-UNLP, CONICET. Calle 60 y 119 (1900) La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Vol. 57, No. 1: 62–71, 2017 Abstract DOI: 10.1515/jppr-2017-0009 Th e eff ect of loose kernel smut fungus Sporisorium cruentum on Sorghum halepense (John- son grass) was investigated in vitro and in greenhouse experiments. Smut infection in- Received: July 13, 2016 duced a decrease in the dry matter of rhizomes and aerial vegetative parts of the plants Accepted: January 17, 2017 evaluated. Moreover, the diseased plants showed a lower height than controls. Th e infec- tion resulted in multiple smutted buds that caused small panicles infected with the fungus. *Corresponding address: In addition, changes were observed in the structural morphology of the host. Leaf tissue [email protected] sections showed hyphae degrading chloroplasts and vascular bundles colonized by the fun- gus. Subsequently, cells collapsed and widespread necrosis was observed as a symptom of the disease. Th e pathogen did not colonize the gynoecium of Sorghum plants until the tas- sel was fully developed. Th e sporulation process of the fungus led to a total disintegration of anthers and tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Smut Fungi (Ustilaginomycetes and Microbotryales, Basidiomycota) in Panama
    Rev. Biol. Trop., 49(2): 411-428, 2001 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes and Microbotryales, Basidiomycota) in Panama Meike Piepenbring Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik/Mykologie, Botanisches Institut, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Fax: 0049 7071 295344 E-mail: [email protected] Received 6-V-2000. Corrected 30-X-2000. Accepted 31-X-2000. Abstract: This is the first publication dedicated to the diversity of smut fungi in Panama based on field work, the study of herbarium specimens, and references taken from literature. It includes smuts parasitizing cultivated and wild plants. The latter are mostly found in rural vegetation. Among the 24 species cited here, 14 species are recorded for the first time for Panama. One of them, Sporisorium ovarium, is observed for the first time in Central America. Entyloma spilanthis is found on the host species Acmella papposa var. macrophylla (Asteraceae) for the first time. Entyloma costaricense and Entyloma ecuadorense are considered synonyms of Entyloma compositarum and Entyloma spilanthis respectively. For the new conbination Sponsorium panamensis see note at the end of this publication. Descriptions of the species are complemented by some illustrations, a checklist, and a key. Key words: Checklist, neotropics, Panama, smut fungi, Sponsorium panamensis, Tilletiales, Ustilaginales Smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes and Micro- literature (Zundel 1939, 1953, Toler et al. 1959, botryales, Urediniomycetes; Basidiomycota; Dennis 1970, Comstock et al. 1983). Bauer et al. 1997, 2001) are parasites of plants, The check list in the present publication is especially herbs belonging to the Poaceae and far from complete, being based on only about Cyperaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Modern Mycology Smut Fungi: a Compendium of Their Diversity and Distribution in India
    MycoAsia – Journal of modern mycology www.mycoasia.org ISSN: 2582-7278 Smut fungi: a compendium of their diversity and distribution in India Ajay Kumar Gautam1, Rajnish Kumar Verma2, Shubhi Avasthi3, Sushma4, Bandarupalli Devadatha5, Shivani Thakur4 Prem Lal Kashyap6, Indu Bhushan Prasher7, Rekha Bhadauria3, Mekala Niranjan8 and Kiran Ramchandra Ranadive9 1School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, 175028, India 2Department of Plant Pathology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141004, India 3School of Studies in Botany, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474011, India 4Department of Biosciences, Chandigarh University Gharuan, Punjab, India 5Fungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry, 605014, India 6ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, India 7Department of Botany, Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Panjab University Chandigarh, 160014, India 8Department of Botany, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Doimukh, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh- 791112, India 9Department of Botany, P.D.E.A.’s Annasaheb Magar Mahavidyalaya, Mahadevnagar, Hadapsar, Pune, Maharashtra, India Abstract A compendium of Indian smut fungi with respect to their diversity and distribution is provided in this paper. After compiling all the information available in online and offline resources, it was revealed that Indian smut fungi comprise 18 genera and 159 species belonging to five families. About
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Sporisorium Scitamineum Isolates, the Causative Agent of Sugarcane Smut in Côte D'ivoire
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 ResearchGate Impact Factor (2018): 0.28 | SJIF (2019): 7.583 Structure of Sporisorium Scitamineum Isolates, the Causative Agent of Sugarcane Smut in Côte D'ivoire Yao Kouadio Jacques-Edouard1*2, Kouamé Konan Didier1, Kouamé Koffi Gaston3, Kassi Koffi Fernand Jean-Martial1, N’guessan Aya Carine3, Eponon Eboa Christophe Ghislain1, Koné Daouda1*2 1Félix Houphouët Boigny University, UFR Biosciences, Laboratory of Biotechnology, Agriculture and Valorization of Biological Resources. Research Unit of Plant Physiology and Pathology. 22 B.P.582 Abidjan 22 2African Centre of Excellence on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture (ECA-CCBAD) 3University of Péléforo Gon COULIBALY (UPCG) Korogho Abstract: The aim of this work was to assess the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics and the variability between isolates of Sporisorium scitamineum present in Côte d'Ivoire. Smut whip samples were collected in 2017 and 2018 in Côte d'Ivoire from four agro- industrial complexes. The fungus was isolated out on PDA medium at the Laboratory. The morphological characters were described on the basis of the growth diameter, texture and colonies colors. The microscopic description focused on the spore’s size from medium and teliospores from whips. An analysis of variance was applied to the measured parameters and the means comparison was performed according to the Newman-Keuls test (post-hoc ANOVA test) at the significance level of 5% using the STATISTICA 7.1 software. Macroscopic results indicated two groups of isolates. Group 1 contains 85% of the isolates and characterized by a white mycelial colony with a cottony appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Variation of Sporisorium Scitamineum in Mainland China Revealed by Internal Transcribed Spacers
    Molecular variation of Sporisorium scitamineum in Mainland China revealed by internal transcribed spacers Y.Y. Zhang1,2*, N. Huang1,2*, X.H. Xiao1,2, L. Huang1,2, F. Liu1,2, W.H. Su1,2 and Y.X. Que1,2 1Key Lab of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China 2Sugarcane Research & Development Center, China Agriculture Research System Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China *These authors contributed equally to this study. Corresponding author: Y.X. Que E-mail: [email protected] Genet. Mol. Res. 14 (3): 7894-7909 (2015) Received November 19, 2014 Accepted March 12, 2015 Published July 14, 2015 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.July.14.15 ABSTRACT. Sugarcane smut caused by the fungus Sporisorium scita- mineum is a worldwide disease and also one of the most prevalent diseases in sugarcane production in mainland China. To study molecular variation in S. scitamineum, 23 S. scitamineum isolates from the 6 primary sugar- cane production areas in mainland, China (Guangxi, Yunnan, Guangdong, Hainan, Fujian, and Jiangxi Provinces), were assessed using internal tran- scribed spacer (ITS) methods. The results of ITS sequence analysis showed that the organisms can be defined at the genus level, including Ustilago and Sporisorium, and can also differentiate between closely related spe- cies. This method was not suitable for phylogenetic relationship analysis of different S. scitamineum isolates and could not provide support regarding their race ascription at the molecular level. The results of the present study will be useful for studies examining the molecular diversity of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Daftar Organisme Pengganggu Tumbuhan Karantina
    PERATURAN MENTERI PERTANIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 51/Permentan/KR.010/9/2015 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS PERATURAN MENTERI PERTANIAN NOMOR 93/Permentan/OT.140/12/2011 TENTANG JENIS ORGANISME PENGGANGGU TUMBUHAN KARANTINA DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA MENTERI PERTANIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, Menimbang : a. bahwa dengan Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 93/Permentan/OT.140/12/2011 telah ditetapkan Jenis Organisme Pengganggu Tumbuhan Karantina; b. bahwa berdasarkan hasil analisis risiko dan pemantauan organisme pengganggu tumbuhan terdapat perubahan status jenis organisme pengganggu tumbuhan karantina; c. bahwa berdasarkan pertimbangan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam huruf a dan huruf b, perlu menetapkan Peraturan Menteri Pertanian tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 93/Permentan/ OT.140/12/2011 tentang Jenis Organisme Pengganggu Tumbuhan Karantina; Mengingat : 1. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 1992 tentang Karantina Hewan, Ikan, dan Tumbuhan (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1992 Nomor 56, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3482); 2. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (Persetujuan Pembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia) (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1994 Nomor 57, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3564); 3. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Karantina Tumbuhan (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2002 Nomor 35, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4196); 4. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 1977 tentang Pengesahan International Plant Protection Convention (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1977 Nomor 8) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 45 Tahun 1990 tentang Pengesahan Revised Text of the International Plant Protection Convention (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1990 Nomor 69); 5. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 121/P Tahun 2014 tentang Pembentukan Kementerian dan Pengangkatan Menteri Kabinet Kerja Periode Tahun 2014-2019; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pathology
    PLANT PATHOLOGY Crop Diseases and their Management Professor Y.S.Ahlawat Division of Plant Pathology Indian Agricultural Research Institute New Delhi-110012 (30-04- 2007) CONTENTS Wheat Diseases Rice Diseases Maize Diseases Sorghum Diseases Bajra Diseases Sugarcane Diseases Groundnut Diseases Sunflower Diseases Mustard Diseases Pigeonpea Diseases Soybean Diseases Gram Diseases Lentil Diseases Cotton Diseases Potato Diseases Tomato Diseases Brinjal Diseases Chilli Diseases Vegetable Crucifer Diseases Vegetable Cucurbit Diseases Pea Diseases Bean Diseases Mango Diseases Apple Diseases Papaya Diseases Citrus Diseases Peach and Pear Diseases Guava Diseases Grape Diseases Sapota Diseases Ber Diseases Custard Apple Diseases Coconut Palm Diseases Management of Plant Diseases Keywords Crop disease, symptom, pathogen, control, disease cycle, economic importance Wheat Diseases 1. Rusts of Wheat The rusts of wheat belong to genus Puccinia, family Pucciniaceae, order Uredinales and class Basidiomycotina. Wheat suffers from three rust diseases namely stem, leaf and stripe rust. Stem rust caused by P. graminis, leaf rust caused by P. recondita but currently P. triticina was suggested to be the preferred name, yellow rust of wheat is caused by P. glumarum but later changed as P. striiformis. Rust fungi which are morphologically identical but attack different host genes are known as special forms (formae specialis) for example, P. graminis on wheat is Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, P. recondita as Puccinia recondita f. sp. graminis and P. striiformis as Puccinia recondita f. sp. graminis. In each special form of these rusts are several pathogenic (physiological) races which can be detected on different varieties of the same species by inoculation and these varieties are known as differential hosts.
    [Show full text]