DOCSLIB.ORG

Conociendo Las Orquídeas De La Gran Senda De Málaga Y Provincia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conociendo Las Orquídeas De La Gran Senda De Málaga Y Provincia Gran Senda de Málaga y provincia • CONOCIENDO LAS ORQUÍDEAS 1 Conociendolas rquídeas O de la 2018 © EDICIÓN Y COORDINACIÓN: DIPUTACIÓN DE MÁLAGA - DELEGACIÓN DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y PROMOCIÓN DEL TERRITORIO - EQUIPO GRAN SENDA DE MÁLAGA C/ Pacífico, 54 - Edificio A - 29004 Málaga Equipo de coordinación y supervisión técnica de la guía: Jacinto Segura Moreno y Antonio Cuñado Bernal TEXTOS: Francisco E. Vázquez Toro Jesús Duarte Duarte FOTOGRAFÍAS: Todas las fotografías recogidas en la guía son propiedad de Francisco E. Vázquez Toro, excepto aquellas que han sido cedidas y se indica el autor: Diego Conradi (DC), Francisco Ruiz Benítez (FRB) Javier Ripoll (JR), Jesús Vílchez (JV), Joaquín Ramírez López (JRL), José Antonio Díaz (JAD), José Quiles (JQ), Miguel Cabrera (MC) y Paco Moreno (PM). Fotografías de cubiertas: Anacamptis pyramidalis, Ophrys atlantica (JRL), Ophrys scolopax (JRL), Ophrys tenthedinifera (JRL), Ophrys vernixia (JRL) y Orchis mascula. DISEÑO CUBIERTAS: José Antonio Sencianes DISEÑO Y MAQUETACIÓN: Antonio González Martínez (El Gutenberg) Primera edición: octubre de 2018 Depósito legal: MA-1436-2018 Impreso en Andalucía por: Imprenta Galindo Ronda Edición NO VENAL Las estratagemas mediante las cuales son fecundadas las orquídeas son tan variadas y casi tan perfectas como cualquiera de las más bellas adaptaciones del mundo animal. Charles Darwin A Joaquín Ramírez López, por su contribución a la divulgación de la biodiversidad de la provincia de Málaga. Los autores Índice Índice Presentación. Elías Bendodo Benasayag................................................................................... 9 Preámbulo. Marina Bravo Casero ..............................................................................................11 Introducción a las orquídeas El triunfo de la sensualidad ..........................................................................................................13 Estructura del libro ............................................................................................................................18 Conociendo a las orquídeas Ciclo biológico......................................................................................................................................21 Partes de una orquídea ....................................................................................................................23 Floración ..................................................................................................................................................32 Polinización ............................................................................................................................................33 Los hábitats de las orquídeas en la provincia de Málaga ..............................................39 Clasificación Las orquídeas en el conjunto de las plantas ........................................................................47 Clave dicotómica de identificación de especies .................................................................51 Híbridos en la provincia de Málaga .........................................................................................56 Fichas descriptivas 1. Anacamptis collina ...............................................................................................................................61 2. Anacamptis coriophora ......................................................................................................................64 3. Anacamptis laxiflora............................................................................................................................67 4. Anacamptis morio subsp. champagneuxii ..............................................................................70 5. Anacamptis papilionacea subsp. expansa .................................................................................73 6. Anacamptis pyramidalis ....................................................................................................................76 7. Cephalanthera longifolia ..................................................................................................................79 8. Cephalanthera rubra ............................................................................................................................82 9. Dactylorhiza elata ..................................................................................................................................85 10. Dactylorhiza insularis .......................................................................................................................88 11. Dactylorhiza sulfurea ........................................................................................................................91 12. Epipactis lusitanica .............................................................................................................................94 13. Epipactis tremolsii ..............................................................................................................................97 14. Gennaria diphylla ............................................................................................................................ 100 15. Himantoglossum hircinum ........................................................................................................103 16. Himantoglossum robertianum.................................................................................................106 17. Limodorum abortivum .................................................................................................................109 6 CONOCIENDO LAS ORQUÍDEAS • Gran Senda de Málaga y provincia Índice 18. Limodorum trabutianum ............................................................................................................112 19. Neotinea conica ................................................................................................................................. 115 20. Neotinea maculata .......................................................................................................................... 118 21. Neotinea ustulata ............................................................................................................................. 121 22. Ophrys algarvensis .......................................................................................................................... 124 23. Ophrys apifera ................................................................................................................................... 127 24. Ophrys atlantica ................................................................................................................................ 130 25. Ophrys bombyliflora ...................................................................................................................... 133 26. Ophrys dyris ........................................................................................................................................ 136 27. Ophrys gr. fusca ................................................................................................................................ 139 28. Ophrys incubacea ............................................................................................................................. 142 29. Ophrys lutea ........................................................................................................................................ 145 30. Ophrys scolopax ................................................................................................................................ 148 31. Ophrys speculum ............................................................................................................................. 151 32. Ophrys tenthredinifera .................................................................................................................154 33. Ophrys vernixia ................................................................................................................................. 157 34. Orchis anthropophora ...................................................................................................................160 35. Orchis cazorlensis ............................................................................................................................ 163 36. Orchis italica ....................................................................................................................................... 166 37. Orchis langei....................................................................................................................................... 169 38. Orchis mascula subsp. olbiensis ...............................................................................................172 39. Serapias cordigera ............................................................................................................................ 175 40. Serapias lingua .................................................................................................................................. 178 41. Serapias parviflora ........................................................................................................................... 181 42. Serapias strictiflora .......................................................................................................................... 184 43. Serapias vomeracea ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epipactis Tremolsii Seed Diversity in Two Close but Extremely Different Populations: Just a Case of Intraspecific Variability?
    plants Article Epipactis tremolsii Seed Diversity in Two Close but Extremely Different Populations: Just a Case of Intraspecific Variability? 1 1, , 1 2 Antonio De Agostini , Pierluigi Cortis * y , Annalena Cogoni , Roberta Gargiulo and Giuseppe Fenu 1 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Via Sant’Ignazio da Laconi 13, 09123 Cagliari, CA, Italy; [email protected] (A.D.A.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (G.F.) 2 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Shared first co-authorship. y Received: 9 November 2020; Accepted: 20 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: Analysis of the seed morphology is a widely used approach in ecological and taxonomic studies. In this context, intraspecific variability with respect to seed morphology (size, weight, and density) was assessed in two close Epipactis tremolsii Pau. populations sharing the same ecological conditions, except for the soil pollution distinguishing one of them. Larger and heavier seeds were found in plants growing on the heavy metal polluted site, while no differences in seed density were detected between seeds produced by plants growing on the contaminated and the control site. Moreover, seed coats and embryos varying together in their dimensions were described in the control population, while coats varying in their size independently from embryos were described in plants growing on the polluted site. Seeds from the two studied populations significantly differed in several parameters suggesting that intraspecific seed variability occurred in the case study. Keywords: Epipactis; intraspecific variability; seed ecology; seed morphometry; heavy metals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Du 15E Colloque Sur Les Orchidées De La Société Française D’Orchidophilie
    Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie du 30 mai au 1er juin 2009 Montpellier, Le Corum Comité d’organisation : Daniel Prat, Francis Dabonneville, Philippe Feldmann, Michel Nicole, Aline Raynal-Roques, Marc-Andre Selosse, Bertrand Schatz Coordinateurs des Actes Daniel Prat & Bertrand Schatz Affiche du Colloque : Conception : Francis Dabonneville Photographies de Francis Dabonneville & Bertrand Schatz Cahiers de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, N° 7, Actes du 15e Colloque sur les orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie. ISSN 0750-0386 © SFO, Paris, 2010 Certificat d’inscription à la commission paritaire N° 55828 ISBN 978-2-905734-17-4 Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, D. Prat et B. Schatz, Coordinateurs, SFO, Paris, 2010, 236 p. Société Française d’Orchidophilie 17 Quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Préface Ce 15e colloque marque le 40e anniversaire de notre société, celle-ci ayant vu le jour en 1969. Notre dernier colloque se tenait il y a 10 ans à Paris en 1999, 10 ans c’est long, 10 ans c’est très loin. Il fallait que la SFO renoue avec cette traditionnelle organisation de colloques, manifestation qui a contribué à lui accorder la place prépondérante qu’elle occupe au sein des orchidophiles français et de la communauté scientifique. C’est chose faite aujourd’hui. Nombreux sont les thèmes qui font l’objet de communications par des intervenants dont les compétences dans le domaine de l’orchidologie ne sont plus à prouver.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of the Flora of the Po@Ega Valley and the Surrounding Mountains
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NAT. CROAT. VOL. 7 No 3 227¿274 ZAGREB September 30, 1998 ISSN 1330¿0520 UDK 581.93(497.5/1–18) THE ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE PO@EGA VALLEY AND THE SURROUNDING MOUNTAINS MIRKO TOMA[EVI] Dr. Vlatka Ma~eka 9, 34000 Po`ega, Croatia Toma{evi} M.: The analysis of the flora of the Po`ega Valley and the surrounding moun- tains, Nat. Croat., Vol. 7, No. 3., 227¿274, 1998, Zagreb Researching the vascular flora of the Po`ega Valley and the surrounding mountains, alto- gether 1467 plant taxa were recorded. An analysis was made of which floral elements particular plant taxa belonged to, as well as an analysis of the life forms. In the vegetation cover of this area plants of the Eurasian floral element as well as European plants represent the major propor- tion. This shows that in the phytogeographical aspect this area belongs to the Eurosiberian- Northamerican region. According to life forms, vascular plants are distributed in the following numbers: H=650, T=355, G=148, P=209, Ch=70, Hy=33. Key words: analysis of flora, floral elements, life forms, the Po`ega Valley, Croatia Toma{evi} M.: Analiza flore Po`e{ke kotline i okolnoga gorja, Nat. Croat., Vol. 7, No. 3., 227¿274, 1998, Zagreb Istra`ivanjem vaskularne flore Po`e{ke kotline i okolnoga gorja ukupno je zabilje`eno i utvr|eno 1467 biljnih svojti. Izvr{ena je analiza pripadnosti pojedinih biljnih svojti odre|enim flornim elementima, te analiza `ivotnih oblika.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae)
    Annals of Botany 110: 71–90, 2012 doi:10.1093/aob/mcs083, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes Luis A. Inda1,*, Manuel Pimentel2 and Mark W. Chase3 1Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, carretera de Cuarte sn. 22071 Huesca, Spain, 2Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Corun˜a, Campus da Zapateira sn. 15071 A Corun˜a, Spain and 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2011 Returned for revision: 9 December 2011 Accepted: 1 March 2012 Published electronically: 25 April 2012 † Background and aims Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) comprises around 62 mostly terrestrial genera, which are well represented in the Northern Temperate Zone and less frequently in tropical areas of both the Old and New Worlds. Phylogenetic relationships within this tribe have been studied previously using only nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer, nrITS). However, different parts of the phylogenetic tree in these analyses were weakly supported, and integrating information from different plant genomes is clearly necessary in orchids, where reticulate evolution events are putatively common. The aims of this study were to: (1) obtain a well-supported and dated phylogenetic hypothesis for tribe Orchideae, (ii) assess appropriateness of recent nomenclatural changes in this tribe in the last decade, (3) detect possible examples of reticulate evolution and (4) analyse in a temporal context evolutionary trends for subtribe Orchidinae with special emphasis on pollination systems.
    [Show full text]
  • New Ten Varieties and Five Subspecies of Crocus Baalbekensis K. Addam & M
    MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences Research Article Open Access New ten varieties and five subspecies of Crocus baalbekensis K. Addam & M. Bou-Hamdan (Iridaceae) endemic to Lebanon added to the Lebanese flora Abstract Volume 4 Issue 6 - 2019 Fifteen new world record Crocus baalbekensis var. decorus, fluctus, flavo-album, 1 2 makniensis, youninensis, rasbaalbekensis, rihaensis, shaathensis, shlifensis, tnaiyetensis, Khodr Addam, Mounir Bou-Hamdan, Jihad subsp. ahlansis, anthopotamus, fakihansis, harbatansis, and rassomensis, joined the Takkoush,3 Kamal Hout4 Lebanese flora and particularly the Iridaceae family. They were found in Baalbek-Hermel 1Head, Integrative and Environmental Research Center, AUL from North Baalbek to Hermel. All of them display C. Baalbekensis but vary in many Beirut, Lebanon 2 taxonomic details. The validation for the existence of these new Varieties and Subspecies Integrative Research and Environmental Center, AUL Beirut, were verified by illustrated morphologic descriptions and observations were based on fresh Lebanon 3 materials. More than twenty years of fieldwork and three years of observation, phenology, Business Research Center, AUL Beirut, Lebanon 4Department of PG Studies & Scientific Research, Global and exploration of a host of locations, numerous quantities were found varying mostly from University Beirut, Lebanon ten to more of the new species. Voucher specimens of the plants (Holotypes) were deposited in K. Addam’s Herbarium at Arts, Sciences and Technology University in Lebanon. Correspondence: Dr. Khodr H Addam, Head, Integrative and The goal of this study was to display a comparative account on the anatomical and ecological Environmental Research Center, AUL, Beirut, Lebanon, Tel 03- characters of the 10 varieties and 5 subspecies of Crocus baalbekensis taxa as well as 204930, Email highlight the taxonomical importance of their corm, corm tunic, leaves, measurements, and Received: November 19, 2019 | Published: December 05, comparisons of other structural anatomical differences and similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Odontoglossum Orchidaceae. O. Chiriquense
    138 Origin: from Baronscourt Nurseries, Newtownstewart, Co. Tyrone, but the exact history is not recorded. Now rare, but O it has been distributed by Gary Dunlop, Ballyrogan Odontoglossum Nurseries, Newtownards, Co. Down, who named the plant. Orchidaceae. refs: G. Dunlop (in litt. 25 January 1998); Ballyrogan Nurseries plant lists 1996, 1997 [without description] O. chiriquense ‘Glasnevin Variety’ c. 1900 syn: Oncidium coronarium, Odontoglossum coronarium O. macrodonta [dwarf] before 1922 Flowers plain yellow (without brown markings); in A dwarf shrub ... ‘I have never seen bloom on the dwarf Olearia’ many-flowered inflorescence, about 6cm across. (Praeger 1922). Origin: presumably from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Origin: from Carrablagh, Co. Donegal, noticed by H. C. Hart. Glasnevin, but its origins are not recorded; the species This is said by Praeger (1922) to have arisen ‘curiously comes from central America and Peru. enough, in the same garden ... at Carrablagh on Lough award: AM (17 July 1900), shown by Royal Botanic Gardens, Swilly’ as Escallonia rubra ‘Woodside’ (qv.). Carrablagh and Glasnevin. Woodside belonged to Henry Chichester Hart and his ref: Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc. 25 (1900): clii. family. ref: Ir. gardening 17 (1922): 18-19. ❀❀❀ O. nitida ‘Castlewellan Variety’ c. 1912 Oenothera ‘much better than the type’. Onagraceae. Evening primrose. Origin: from Daisy Hill Nursery, Newry, Co. Down; t his would have been obtained from Earl Annesley, who had a O. fruticosa ‘Lady Brookeborough’ remarkable garden at Castlewellan (see Nelson & Deane unknown syn: O. tetragona ‘Lady Brookeborough’, ‘Lady Brookborough’ (1993)). The name appears in manuscript in Smith’s Flowers ‘large and brilliant’. annotated copy of catalogue no.
    [Show full text]
  • Publikationsliste Hannes F. Paulus (1999-2011) (Ausgewählte Arbeiten)
    Publikationsliste Hannes F. Paulus (1999-2011) (ausgewählte Arbeiten) 2011 HIRTH M & PAULUS HF (2011) Ophrys samiotissa, eine neue Art der O. oestrifera- holosericea-Gruppe aus Samos (Orchidaceae). - J. Eur. Orch. 43 (4) : 863-873 PAULUS HF (2011) Attack or copulate ? Ambivalente behaviour of Xylocopa males against the sexual deceptive orchid Ophrys grigoriana in Crete. Attackieren oder Kopulieren? (Orchidaceae und Insecta, Apoidea). - J.Eur.Orch. 43 (1): 501-528 PAULUS HF & HIRTH M (2011) Die Grabwespe Argogorytes fargeii als Bestäuber von Ophrys regis-ferdinandii (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Crabronidae und Orchidaceae) – Untersuchungen in Rhodos, Chios und Samos. - J.Eur.Orch. 43 (2): 227-239 PAULUS HF (2011) Bienen und Pollen. - Natur & Land 97 (2): 10-15. PAULUS HF & HIRTH M (2011) Ophrys heterochila, Ophrys dodekanensis, Ophrys minutula, Ophrys oreas - Versuch einer Neubewertung. - J. Eur. Orch. 43 (3) : 651-679 PAULUS HF (2011) Zur Bestäubungsbiologie einiger Ophrys-Arten in Nordthessalien mit Beschreibung von Ophrys olympiotissa aus der Ophrys argolica – ferrum-equinum-Gruppe (Orchidaceae und Insecta, Apoidea). - J. Eur. Orch. 43 (3) : 498-526 SCHLÜTER PM, RUAS PM, KOHL G, RUAS CF, STUESSY TF & PAULUS HF (2011)Evidence for progenitor–derivative speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. – Annals of Botany 108 (5): 895-906 VEREECKEN NJ, STREINZER M, AYASSE M, SPAETHE J, PAULUS HF, STÖKL J, CORTIS P & SCHIESTL FP (2011) Integrating past and present studies on Ophrys pollination - a comment to BRADSHAW et al. - Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 165: 329-335 2010 PAULUS HF (2010) Bestäubungsbiologie einiger Ophrys-Arten der Süd-Türkei (Prov. Antalya) mit Beschreibung einer weiteren „Käfer-fusca“ Ophrys urteae spec.nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumscribing Genera in the European Orchid Flora: a Subjective
    Ber. Arbeitskrs. Heim. Orchid. Beiheft 8; 2012: 94 - 126 Circumscribing genera in the European orchid lora: a subjective critique of recent contributions Richard M. BATEMAN Keywords: Anacamptis, Androrchis, classiication, evolutionary tree, genus circumscription, monophyly, orchid, Orchidinae, Orchis, phylogeny, taxonomy. Zusammenfassung/Summary: BATEMAN , R. M. (2012): Circumscribing genera in the European orchid lora: a subjective critique of recent contributions. – Ber. Arbeitskrs. Heim. Orch. Beiheft 8; 2012: 94 - 126. Die Abgrenzung von Gattungen oder anderen höheren Taxa erfolgt nach modernen Ansätzen weitestgehend auf der Rekonstruktion der Stammesgeschichte (Stamm- baum-Theorie), mit Hilfe von großen Daten-Matrizen. Wenngleich aufgrund des Fortschritts in der DNS-Sequenzierungstechnik immer mehr Merkmale in der DNS identiiziert werden, ist es mindestens genauso wichtig, die Anzahl der analysierten Planzen zu erhöhen, um genaue Zuordnungen zu erschließen. Die größere Vielfalt mathematischer Methoden zur Erstellung von Stammbäumen führt nicht gleichzeitig zu verbesserten Methoden zur Beurteilung der Stabilität der Zweige innerhalb der Stammbäume. Ein weiterer kontraproduktiver Trend ist die wachsende Tendenz, diverse Datengruppen mit einzelnen Matrizen zu verquicken, die besser einzeln analysiert würden, um festzustellen, ob sie ähnliche Schlussfolgerungen bezüglich der Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse liefern. Ein Stammbaum zur Abgrenzung höherer Taxa muss nicht so robust sein, wie ein Stammbaum, aus dem man Details des Evo- lutionsmusters
    [Show full text]
  • The Orchids of the Isle of Formentera
    Jour. Eur. Orch. 37 (4): 501 – 528. 2005. Barbara Klahr Translated by Dr.Eckhard Kiehl The Orchids of the Isle of Formentera Keywords Orchidaceae; Aceras anthropophorum, Barlia robertiana, Gennaria diphylla, Neotinea maculata, Ophrys bombyliflora, O. dyris, O. cf. fabrella, O. fusca, O. speculum, O. tenthredinifera, Orchis collina, O. fragrans, Serapias parviflora; Formentera, Pityuses, Balearic Islands; distribution; ecology; endangerment; protection. Summary Klahr, B. (2005): The orchids of Formentera.- Jour. Eur. Orch. 37 (4): 501 XXX. A short review of history and geography of Formentera is given; aspects of flora and fauna of a south mediterranean Island, survival of plants in a half-arid zone without any wells or fresh ground water. As the most southern Island of the Pityuses, Formentera belongs climatically more to Africa than to Europe. It is a very rocky eroded Island after having had a long period without agriculture. Endemic species in flora and fauna are mentioned. Wild Orchids are growing on this small Island mainly in the higher regions of the plateau La Mola and Cap de Barbaria. There is not as much pastureland as in other mediterranean countries. Ophrys and Orchis predominate.. Most areas of Formentera were explored during the whole year, also difficult to reach regions like “Torrentes” (Canyons). The period of my observation is 2002 - 2005. The Orchids are endangered as a result of the reinforced agriculture and chemical fertilizing, subsidized by the EU, and by increasing building activities. Centuries fallow agricultural land that makes very interesting biotopes will be destroyed. The orchids of Formentera are bibliographically quoted; the results are to be supplemented with four new found species and new sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Journal of Botany
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313842333 RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES AFFECT ORCHID DIVERSITY OF ALBANIAN GRAVEYARDS Article · February 2017 CITATIONS READS 4 142 7 authors, including: Attila Molnár V. Zoltán Barina University of Debrecen Hungarian Natural History Museum 157 PUBLICATIONS 610 CITATIONS 64 PUBLICATIONS 361 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Gábor Sramkó Jácint Tökölyi Hungarian Academy of Sciences University of Debrecen 92 PUBLICATIONS 495 CITATIONS 43 PUBLICATIONS 284 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Hydra Eco-Evo-Devo View project NKFIH K-119225 - How can plant ecology support grassland restoration? View project All content following this page was uploaded by Attila Molnár V. on 19 February 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Pak. J. Bot., 49(1): 289-303, 2017. RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES AFFECT ORCHID DIVERSITY OF ALBANIAN GRAVEYARDS ATTILA MOLNÁR V.1,2*, ATTILA TAKÁCS1,2, EDVÁRD MIZSEI3, VIKTOR LÖKI1, ZOLTÁN BARINA4, GÁBOR SRAMKÓ1,2 AND JÁCINT TÖKÖLYI5 1Department of Botany, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 2MTA-DE “Lendület” Evolutionary Phylogenomics Research Group, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 3Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 4Department of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1431 Budapest, Pf. 137, Hungary 5MTA-DE “Lendület” Behavioural Ecology Research Group, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected], Phone: +36-52-/512-900/62648 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Environment Interactions: from Sensory Plant Biology to Active
    Signaling and Communication in Plants Series Editors František Baluška Department of Plant Cell Biology, IZMB, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, D-53115 Bonn, Germany Jorge Vivanco Center for Rhizosphere Biology, Colorado State University, 217 Shepardson Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1173, USA František Baluška Editor Plant-Environment Interactions From Sensory Plant Biology to Active Plant Behavior Editor František Baluška Department of Plant Cell Biology IZMB University of Bonn Kirschallee 1 D-53115 Bonn Germany email: [email protected] ISSN 1867-9048 ISBN 978-3-540-89229-8 e-ISBN 978-3-540-89230-4 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89230-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008938968 © 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMXDesign GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany Printed on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com František Baluška dedicates this book to Prof.
    [Show full text]