Stump, Morphotactics Lecture 2, 7-10-17.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
7-6-17 Morphotactics 1 1. Canonical typology 2. Canonical inflection 3. Canonical morphotactics 7-6-17 Morphotactics 2 1. Canonical typology ✔ ︎ 2. Canonical inflection ✔ ︎ 3. Canonical morphotactics 7-10-17 Morphotactics 3 First off, what is morphotactics? The internal patterns according to which a language’s complex word forms are defined constitute its morphotactics. In the morpheme-based approaches to morphology that emerged in the twentieth century, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the concatenation of morphemes (a perspective still held by many linguists). In rule-based conceptions of morphology, by contrast, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the interaction of its rules of morphology in the definition of a word form. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 4 First off, what is morphotactics? The internal patterns according to which a language’s complex word forms are defined constitute its morphotactics. In the morpheme-based approaches to morphology that emerged in the twentieth century, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the concatenation of morphemes (a perspective still held by many linguists). In rule-based conceptions of morphology, by contrast, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the interaction of its rules of morphology in the definition of a word form. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 5 First off, what is morphotactics? The internal patterns according to which a language’s complex word forms are defined constitute its morphotactics. In the morpheme-based approaches to morphology that emerged in the twentieth century, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the concatenation of morphemes (a perspective still held by many linguists). In rule-based conceptions of morphology, by contrast, a language’s morphotactic principles are constraints on the interaction of its rules of morphology in the definition of a word form. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 6 A morphotactic system is canonical to the extent that it satisfies the criteria in (1). (1) a. A rule of affixation introduces a single affix. b. A rule of affixation is either a rule of suffixation, a rule of prefixation or a rule of infixation. c. An affix is morphologically unanalyzable; that is, a rule of affixation is not a combination of rules of affixation. d. A morphological rule always expresses the same content. e. Relations of paradigmatic opposition hold between individual rules. f. Allomorphy is locally conditioned. g. Where X and Y are derivational affixes, a stem of the form Stem‑X‑Y entails a stem of the form Stem‑X, but the reverse is not true. h. The application of a rule of affixation may be conditioned by the grammatical properties that it realizes and by the properties of the stem to which it applies, but is not directly sensitive to the application of any other rule of affixation. i. Rules of inflectional affixation apply in a fixed sequence. j. A rule of affixation applies at most once in the definition of a word form’s morphology. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 7 A morphotactic system is canonical to the extent that it satisfies the criteria in (1). (1) a. A rule of affixation introduces a single affix. ✔ ︎︎ b. A rule of affixation is either a rule of suffixation, a rule of prefixation or a rule of infixation. ✔ ︎︎ c. An affix is morphologically unanalyzable; that is, a rule of affixation is not a combination of rules of affixation. ✔ ︎︎ d. A morphological rule always expresses the same content. ✔ ︎︎ e. Relations of paradigmatic opposition hold between individual rules. ✔ ︎︎ f. Allomorphy is locally conditioned. ✔ ︎︎ g. Where X and Y are derivational affixes, a stem of the form Stem‑X‑Y entails a stem of the form Stem‑X, but the reverse is not true. h. The application of a rule of affixation may be conditioned by the grammatical properties that it realizes and by the properties of the stem to which it applies, but is not directly sensitive to the application of any other rule of affixation. i. Rules of inflectional affixation apply in a fixed sequence. j. A rule of affixation applies at most once in the definition of a word form’s morphology. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 8 (1g) Where X and Y are derivational suffixes, a stem of the form Stem‑X‑Y implies a stem of the form Stem‑X, but the reverse is not true. Swahili Stem-an-isha [Stem-RECIPROCAL-CAUSATIVE] Stem-ana: [Stem-RECIPROCAL] kupiga ‘to beat’, kupiganisha ‘to cause to beat each other’, hence kupigana ‘to beat each other’ Walmart, Walmartization but not *Walmartize 7-10-17 Morphotactics 9 (1g) Where X and Y are derivational suffixes, a stem of the form Stem‑X‑Y implies a stem of the form Stem‑X, but the reverse is not true. Swahili Stem-an-isha [Stem-RECIPROCAL-CAUSATIVE] Stem-ana: [Stem-RECIPROCAL] kupiga ‘to beat’, kupiganisha ‘to cause to beat each other’, hence kupigana ‘to beat each other’ Walmart, Walmartization but not *Walmartize 7-10-17 Morphotactics 10 (1g) Where X and Y are derivational suffixes, a stem of the form Stem‑X‑Y implies a stem of the form Stem‑X, but the reverse is not true. Swahili Stem-an-isha [Stem-RECIPROCAL-CAUSATIVE] Stem-ana: [Stem-RECIPROCAL] kupiga ‘to beat’, kupiganisha ‘to cause to beat each other’, hence kupigana ‘to beat each other’ Walmart, Walmartization but not *Walmartize 7-10-17 Morphotactics 11 (1h) The application of a rule of affixation may be conditioned by the grammatical properties that it realizes and by the properties of the stem to which it applies, but is not directly sensitive to the application of any other rule of affixation. Swahili ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ a-vi-soma-vyo ‘which he reads’ a-me-vyo-vi-soma ‘which he has read’ 7-10-17 Morphotactics 12 (1h) The application of a rule of affixation may be conditioned by the grammatical properties that it realizes and by the properties of the stem to which it applies, but is not directly sensitive to the application of any other rule of affixation. Swahili ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ a-vi-soma-vyo ‘which he reads’ a-me-vyo-vi-soma ‘which he has read’ 7-10-17 Morphotactics 13 (1h) The application of a rule of affixation may be conditioned by the grammatical properties that it realizes and by the properties of the stem to which it applies, but is not directly sensitive to the application of any other rule of affixation. Swahili ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ a-vi-soma-vyo ‘which he reads’ a-me-vyo-vi-soma ‘which he has read’ 7-10-17 Morphotactics 14 (1i) Rules of inflectional affixation apply in a fixed sequence. ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ A B C Inflectional prefixes in Chintang (Kiranti; Nepal) u–kha–ma–cop–yokt–e. u–ma–kha–cop–yokt–e. 3NSA–1NSP–NEG–see–NEG–PST kha–u–ma–cop–yokt–e. ‘They didn’t see us.’ ma–u–kha–cop–yokt–e. kha–ma–u–cop–yokt–e. ma–kha–u–cop–yokt–e. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 15 (1i) Rules of inflectional affixation apply in a fixed sequence. ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ A B C Inflectional prefixes in Chintang (Kiranti; Nepal) u–kha–ma–cop–yokt–e. u–ma–kha–cop–yokt–e. 3NSA–1NSP–NEG–see–NEG–PST kha–u–ma–cop–yokt–e. ‘They didn’t see us.’ ma–u–kha–cop–yokt–e. kha–ma–u–cop–yokt–e. ma–kha–u–cop–yokt–e. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 16 (1i) Rules of inflectional affixation apply in a fixed sequence. ha-tu-ta-taka ‘we will not want’ A B C Inflectional prefixes in Chintang (Kiranti; Nepal) u–kha–ma–cop–yokt–e. u–ma–kha–cop–yokt–e. 3NSA–1NSP–NEG–see–NEG–PST kha–u–ma–cop–yokt–e. ‘They didn’t see us.’ ma–u–kha–cop–yokt–e. kha–ma–u–cop–yokt–e. ma–kha–u–cop–yokt–e. 7-10-17 Morphotactics 17 (1j) A rule of affixation applies at most once in the definition of a word form’s morphology. Latin laudābantur ‘they were being praised’ Perfect-tense forms of HUṚ ‘see’ in Pengo [S. Central Dravidian] Singular Plural st 1 huṛ-t-aŋ-n-aŋ EXCL. huṛ-t-ap-na, INCL. huṛ-t-ah-na 2nd huṛ-t-ay-na huṛ-t-ader-na 3rd m. huṛ-t-an-na huṛ-t-ar-na f. huṛ-t-ik-n-ik huṛ-t-at-na n. huṛ-t-iŋ-n-iŋ 7-10-17 Morphotactics 18 (1j) A rule of affixation applies at most once in the definition of a word form’s morphology. Latin laudābantur ‘they were being praised’ Perfect-tense forms of HUṚ ‘see’ in Pengo [S. Central Dravidian] Singular Plural st 1 huṛ-t-aŋ-n-aŋ EXCL. huṛ-t-ap-na, INCL. huṛ-t-ah-na 2nd huṛ-t-ay-na huṛ-t-ader-na 3rd m. huṛ-t-an-na huṛ-t-ar-na f. huṛ-t-ik-n-ik huṛ-t-at-na n. huṛ-t-iŋ-n-iŋ 7-10-17 Morphotactics 19 (1j) A rule of affixation applies at most once in the definition of a word form’s morphology. Latin laudābantur ‘they were being praised’ Perfect-tense forms of HUṚ ‘see’ in Pengo [S. Central Dravidian] Singular Plural EXCL. huṛ-t-ap-na, 1st huṛ-t-aŋ-n-aŋ INCL. huṛ-t-ah-na 2nd huṛ-t-ay-na huṛ-t-ader-na 3rd m.