DOCSLIB.ORG

Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building Structural Enhancements Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building Structural Enhancements Project EDWARD J. SCHWARTZ FEDERAL BUILDING STRUCTURAL ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Final Environmental Assessment Prepared by the United States General Services Administration July 2019 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EDWARD J. SCHWARTZ FEDERAL BUILDING STRUCTURAL ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA JULY 2019 Lead Agency: U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) 50 United Nations Plaza San Francisco, CA, 94102 Lead Agency Contact: Mr. Osmahn Kadri Regional Environmental Quality Advisor/NEPA Project Manager Portfolio Management Division (9PTC) U.S. General Services Administration 50 United Nations Plaza, Room 3345, Mailbox 9 San Francisco, California, 94102 Telephone: (415) 522-3617 Email: [email protected] Availability of Final EA: This document is available for public review at the San Diego Central Library, located at 330 Park Blvd, San Diego, CA 92101, and on the GSA website (www.gsa.gov/nepalibrary). Abstract: This document is an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building Structural Enhancements Project. The Project is located at 880 Front Street in San Diego, California at the Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building and United States Courthouse. The Project is proposed in order to improve structural safety for the public traveling underneath the building and for the tenants occupying the building above the Front Street underpass. This Final EA analyzes an Action Alternative and a No Action Alternative. The Action Alternative would consist of structural enhancements to the portion of the existing Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building over Front Street between E and F streets. Existing columns and beams supporting the building at the Front Street underpass would be reinforced with new steel beams and column support structures and pre-cast concrete paneling. Construction would require full and partial closure of Front Street between Broadway and F Street. Street closure options during construction of the Action Alternative are being considered and a comprehensive Traffic Control Plan will be prepared to address the street closure. Under the No Action Alternative, structural enhancements to the existing Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building would not occur. Public Comments: The Draft EA was made publicly available on November 19, 2018 for a 30-day period. The public review period closed on December 17, 2018. The Notice of Availability for the Draft EA was published in the Federal Register on November 19, 2018. A public meeting took place on November 28, 2018 in the Downtown San Diego community. In preparing this Final EA, GSA considered public comments received regarding the Draft EA during the public review period. This Final EA contains revisions to the draft document based, in part, on the public comments received on the Draft EA. Revisions are indicated in this Final EA by a line in the margin. This page intentionally left blank Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building Structural Enhancements Project Environmental Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. S-1 CHAPTER 1.0 – PURPOSE AND NEED ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action ..................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Scope of the EA ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.1 Purpose of the EA ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.2 Scope of the EA ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Document Organization ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination ................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Environmental Review Process ........................................................................................ 1-3 CHAPTER 2.0 – PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Structural Enhancements ................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Street Closure ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Construction Methodology and Schedule .......................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Best Management Practices ............................................................................... 2-3 2.2 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Permits and Approvals Needed ....................................................................................... 2-5 CHAPTER 3.0 – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES; AND AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND/OR MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................. 3.1-1 3.1 Land Use and Community Issues .................................................................................. 3.1-1 3.1.1 Existing and Future Land Use ........................................................................... 3.1-1 3.1.2 Consistency with State, Regional, and Local Plans .......................................... 3.1-3 3.1.3 Parks and Recreational Facilities ..................................................................... 3.1-8 3.1.4 Community Cohesion and Community Character ......................................... 3.1-10 3.1.5 Environmental Justice .................................................................................... 3.1-18 3.1.6 Environmental Health and Safety Risks to Children ...................................... 3.1-20 3.2 Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 3.2-1 3.2.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... 3.2-1 3.2.2 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3.2-1 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................... 3.2-15 3.2.4 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures ................................ 3.2-31 i July 2019 Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building Structural Enhancements Project Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 3.3 Noise and Vibration ...................................................................................................... 3.3-1 3.3.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... 3.3-1 3.3.2 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3.3-1 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences ......................................................................... 3.3-2 3.3.4 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures .................................. 3.3-4 3.4 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................. 3.4-1 3.4.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... 3.4-1 3.4.2 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3.4-5 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences ......................................................................... 3.4-9 3.4.4 Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures ................................ 3.4-12 3.5 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources .......................................... 3.5-1 3.5.1 Action Alternative ............................................................................................ 3.5-1 3.5.2 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 3.5-1 3.6 Cumulative Impacts ...................................................................................................... 3.6-1 3.6.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... 3.6-1 3.6.2 Affected Environment ...................................................................................... 3.6-1 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences ......................................................................... 3.6-2 3.6.4 Avoidance, Minimization and/or Mitigation Measures ................................... 3.6-6 CHAPTER 4.0 – PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COORDINATION ................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Public Scoping Process ..................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Notice of Intent ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Consultation and Coordination with Public Agencies .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Ablueprintforbuildingonesandiego”
    “A Blueprint for Building One San Diego” Mayor Kevin L. Faulconer 1 TRANSITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS June 12, 2014 The Office of the Mayor would like to thank the following members of the One San Diego Transition Advisory Committee for volunteering their time to reviewing materials, attending meetings and providing valuable input for this report. ONE SAN DIEGO TRANSITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHAIRS Stephen Cushman Tony Young MEMBERS Susie Baumann Ben Katz Faith Bautista Leslie Kilpatrick Sam Bedwell Ure Kretowicz Blanca Lopez Brown Pastor Rick Laster Mark Cafferty Elyse Lowe Dr. Constance M. Carroll Lani Lutar Father Joe Carroll William D. Lynch Sharon Cloward Tony Manolatos Byeong Dae Kim Cindy Marten Aimee Faucett Brian Marvel Randy Frisch Vincent E. Mudd Ronne Froman Nicole Murray-Ramirez Gary Gallegos Bob Nelson Rick Gentry Joseph D. Panetta Bill Geppert Dan Stoneman Robert Gleason Russ Thurman Jeff Graham Rick Valencia Abdur-Rahim Hameed Kristen Victor Dan Hom Reverend Walter G. Wells Jennifer Jacobs Faye Wilson Tracy Jarman Christopher Yanov Susan Jester Barbara Ybarra Jeff Johnson Michael Zucchet 2 ONE SAN DIEGO TRANSITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 4 Subcommittee Reports ............................................................................. 7 Education & Youth Opportunity ............................................................ 7 Homeless & Housing Affordability ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday, May 12
    Wednesday,2018 May 9 – Saturday, May 12 – LINK Presenting Sponsors – LINK 2018 – San Diego Region Dear LINK Participants, Welcome to the 22nd LINK program. The purpose of LINK is to expose you, first-hand, to the successes and challenges of other metropolitan areas, while providing networking opportunities with leaders from the region we visit, as well as leaders from our own region. This year we travel to the San Diego region. Known for its innovation economy and beautiful natural environment, San Diego is uniquely located on the U.S.-Mexico border, and shares deep economic and cultural ties with Tijuana. With these great assets come challenges, including an increasing housing affordability and homelessness crisis. Home to a large concentration of U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps troops and installations, the region’s long military roots drew researchers and innovators in communications technology to the region. San Diego leaders also actively recruited life sciences and biotechnology research institutions, further solidifying the region’s innovation economy. We will see the richness of San Diego’s economy and the workforce development work underway to support it, while also hearing from leaders of the innovation and defense sectors. We will also see the region’s challenges in providing enough housing for all San Diegans. Affordability is a challenge across many income levels, and homelessness is growing. Through a series of tours, presentations and panel discussions, LINK participants will explore various topics in the San Diego region, including those mentioned above and many more. It is our hope that the 2018 LINK trip will provide you with fresh ideas and new insights for addressing the issues and opportunities we face back home, such as workforce development and our increasing challenge of housing affordability.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Prepared by the Finance Department San Diego, California 92123 Helix WATER DISTRICT CITY OF * * The Sweetwater Authority is a service organization for the City of National City and the South Bay Irrigation District. Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................................................... 1 Awards and Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 17 San Diego County Water Authority Board of Directors ....................................................................... 19 San Diego County Water Authority Organizational Structure .............................................................. 20 Financial Section Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................... 21 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information) ...................... 25 Financial Statements Statement of Net Position ..................................................................................................................... 35 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ......................................................... 36 Statement of Cash Flows ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Hotel Santee
    MARKET STUDY Proposed Hotel Santee RIVERVIEW PARKWAY SANTEE, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO:PROPOSED PREPARED BY: Ms. Pamela White HVS Consulting & Valuation City of Santee Division of TS Worldwide, LLC 10601 Magnolia Avenue 100 Bush Street, Suite 1625 Santee, California 92071 San Francisco, California 94104 +1 (619) 258-4100 ext. 223 +1 (415) 896-0868 July‐2018 September 10, 2018 Ms. Pamela White City of Santee 10601 Magnolia Avenue Santee, California 92071 HVS SAN FRANCISCO Re: Hotel Market Analysis 100 Bush Street, Suite 1625 San Francisco, California, 94104 Santee, California +1 (415) 896‐0868 HVS Reference: 2017021673 +1 (415) 896‐0516 FAX www.hvs.com Dear Ms. White: Pursuant to your request, please find attached our study of the Santee, California, hotel market. Our investigation reveals that the market has the potential to support new hotel development. This engagement addresses market demand for new hotel development; no analysis of financial feasibility has been undertaken. We hereby certify that we have no undisclosed interest in the property, and our employment and compensation are not contingent upon our findings. This study is subject to the comments made throughout this report and to all assumptions and limiting conditions set forth herein. Sincerely, TS Worldwide, LLC Suzanne R. Mellen, MAI, CRE, FRICS, ISHC, Senior Managing Director - Practice Leader [email protected], +1 (415) 268-0351 McKenna K. Luke, MAI Director [email protected], +1 (303) 704-2636 Superior results through unrivaled hospitality intelligence. Everywhere. Table of Contents SECTION TITLE PAGE 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Market Area Analysis 9 3. Hotel Supply and Demand Analysis 31 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 cover design by m.wojcik COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 San Diego, California 92123 Prepared by the Finance Department This page intentionally left blank. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Awards and Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 12 San Diego County Water Authority Board of Directors .......................................................................... 14 San Diego County Water Authority Organizational Structure ................................................................ 15 Financial Section Independent Auditor’s Report .................................................................................................................... 17 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information) .......................21 Financial Statements Statement of Net Position ........................................................................................................................... 31 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ............................................................ 32 Statement of Cash Flows ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sciences San Diego 1.0 Prepared By
    Health Sciences San Diego 1.0 Prepared By: CSUSM FEMBA Cohort Class 2016 Fall 2015 Health Sciences San Diego 1.0 Table of Contents TABLE OF TABLES III 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IV 1.1. KEY DEMOGRAPHICS 1 2. HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 2.1. KEY PLAYERS 3 2.1.1. UC SAN DIEGO HEALTH 3 2.1.2. SCRIPPS HEALTHCARE 5 2.1.3. KAISER PERMANENTE 5 2.1.4. SHARP HEALTHCARE 5 2.1.5. VETERANS AFFAIRS 6 2.1.6. OTHER HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS 6 2.2. CRITICAL FACTORS 6 2.3. KEY PLAYER INTERACTIONS IN SAN DIEGO 8 2.4. INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT 10 2.4.1. FACILITIES AND EXPANSION 10 2.4.2. HEALTHCARE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HIT) 11 2.5. INDUSTRY CHALLENGES 12 3. BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY 15 3.1. CRITICAL FACTORS 15 3.2. KEY PLAYERS 18 3.2.1. THERMO FISHER 18 3.2.2. ILLUMINA 18 3.2.3. PFIZER 19 3.2.4. JOHNSON & JOHNSON 20 3.2.5. NOVARTIS 21 3.3. KEY PLAYER INTERACTIONS IN SAN DIEGO 21 3.4. INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT 24 3.4.1. INDUSTRY TRENDS – BIOTECHNOLOGY 24 3.4.2. INDUSTRY TRENDS – PHARMACEUTICAL 26 3.4.3. INDUSTRY TRENDS – DIAGNOSTICS 27 3.5. INDUSTRY CHALLENGES 27 3.5.1. COMPETITION OF BIOTECH AND PHARMACEUTICAL IN SAN DIEGO 28 3.5.2. FUNDING, TAXES, AND REGULATION OF BIOTECH AND PHARMACEUTICAL IN SAN DIEGO 28 4. BIOMEDICAL DEVICES INDUSTRY 30 HSSD 1.0 Page i Health Sciences San Diego 1.0 4.1. CRITICAL FACTORS 30 4.2. KEY PLAYERS 33 4.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 3 San Diego's Economy
    Lesson 4: San Diego’s Economy Focus Question: What are the largest industries in San Diego’s economy? The top four industries in San Diego County are manufacturing, defense, tourism, and agriculture. In addition, the City of San Diego focuses on six main industry clusters: Biotechnology/Biosciences Financial and Business Services Defense and Space Manufacturing Software Electronics Manufacturing Telecommunications San Diego's economy, once dominated by military and defense endeavors is led by manufacturing, particularly in the areas of shipbuilding and repair, industrial machinery and computers, metals production, and the manufacture of toys and sporting goods. International trade is an important part of San Diego's economy. The border between the San Diego area and Tijuana is the busiest in the world. Since the founding of San Diego, the city's economy has been tied to San Diego Bay. Today, it is an important link in the nation's international shipping trade and the port also has a growing cruise ship operation, with more than 180 cruise ships docking annually. San Diego's harbor has had the most significant impact on the local economy, however, through the Eleventh Naval District Headquarters, the base for the U.S. Navy Pacific fleet, which is located on the bay. San Diego is the Navy's principal location for West Coast and Pacific Ocean operations. The military/defense industry is the city's second largest economic sector. It includes high-technology research, development, and engineering in satellite communications systems, electronic systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, propulsion systems, deep space cameras, satellites, rugged military computers and displays, and robotic roving vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: City of San Diego Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Study
    Arts and Economic Prosperity® 5 was conducted by Americans for the Arts, the nation’s nonprofit organization for advancing the arts in America. Established in 1960, we are dedicated to representing and serving local communities and creating opportunities for every American to participate in and appreciate all forms of the arts. Copyright 2017 by Americans for the Arts, 1000 Vermont Avenue NW, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005. Arts & Economic Prosperity is a registered trademark of Americans for the Arts. Reprinted by permission. Printed in the United States. Table of Contents The Arts Mean Business ........................................................... 1 By Robert L. Lynch, President and CEO, Americans for the Arts The Economic Impact of the Nonprofit Arts and Culture Industry in the City of San Diego ................................................................ 3 Defining Economic Impact .....................................................................3 Economic Impact of the Nonprofit Arts and Culture Industry ...............4 Direct, Indirect, and Induced Economic Impact: How a Dollar is Respent in the Economy ..........................................................5 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonprofit Arts and Cultural ORGANIZATIONS .................................................................6 An Economic Impact Beyond Dollars: Volunteerism .......................7 The Value of In-Kind Contributions to Arts Organizations ..............7 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonprofit Arts and Cultural AUDIENCES ...........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Q SDSU Economic Impact Report
    APPENDIX (2 SDSU ECONOMIC ~XIPACT REPORT San Diego State University Measuring the Economic Impact on the Region Final WeporQ :i July 19, 2007 i :;::::::::::i-~_i . :il, ~:~-r'~:l:.~~il~~-::~::~::::.i:ii: ~~.lii~;~~~j: ;·I:::::.(·::-.~~-I:_:).i:i-l;,:l: 8 1· ~"~""~ ~, i3~~·B"hi:·ic;;i· ;.-:·: i: :·: ; ~ b ~'"j ~i· :s ·wi ~ li~i~ ~ ~:~P~i ~i~i~ii~i~l-- " 07-032 :·i :: i- i: -~~- ·i::::· ,_~~c~i~o~~,·~id~~s:~r~s ~·-~~~~~B;f 'ICF ~:~·~·1·i I N'i~E R N B`Tia3 M ~L i ~,~· a~s~e~P-- -- ICF INTERNATIONAL - San Diego State University Measuring the Economic Impact on the Region Final Weport July 19, 2007 Prepared for: San Diego State University San Diego, CA Prepared by: ICF International 394 Pacific Avenue, 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 677-7184 07-032 ~sTable of ConQents ·1. Executive Summary ...............................................··.·.·····················································1 -~ 1.1. SDSU's Economic Impact on the San Diego Region: Model-Based Analysis.......... 1-1 1.2. SDSU's Impact on San Diego's Economic Foundations: Qualitative Analysis......... 1-4 1.2.1. Workforce Development ...............................................................·...-····································-········-···1-5 1.2.2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship..........................................................·.······························-······-···1-6 .1.2.3. Quality of Life.....................................................................................-········-··-····-·····.·············-·····-·········1-8 1.2.4. Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Airport Exploratory Study 2.0 Report
    Southern California Airport Exploratory Study 2.0 Tri-County Region: Orange County Riverside County San Diego County Prepared by: CSUSM FEMBA Class of 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: TRI‐COUNTY REGION ...................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Scope and Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Methodology............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Defining the Geographic Reach ......................................................................................................................... 8 Airport Proximity ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Describing the Tri‐County Region ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise in San Diego County
    Regional Economic Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise In San Diego County Prepared for San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative Center for the Blue Economy Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey March 2018 0 Contents List of Figures and Tables .................................................................................................. 2 Authors ................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 10 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ................................................................................................... 15 Major Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 15 How the Risks of Sea Level Rise Shape Vulnerabilities ................................................................... 22 3. Detailed Analysis ......................................................................................................... 23 Summary for San Diego County .................................................................................................... 23 Flooding Scenarios
    [Show full text]
  • Oncepm Bimo and Exhibit Tnvirotents
    oncepm bimo and Exhibit tnvirOTents. Ili'K ,/^"" 'IT ii ;|i'i I lit . I '> nnn,|l,jji:!(l'' 'Mim||l(||l(HH •nillldLltiUll COMPUTER ART CONCEPTUAL ST 010 AND EXH IBJT E'.\/VlROi\MENTS by KONRAD A. JUDD A THL ' tS IN ARCHIT TURE Submitted to th e Architec tu re facu lty of the College uf Ar hitecture of Texas Tech Univer ny in Partial Fulfillment of the Reqmrements for the Degree of BACHELOR OF AR 'HtTECT . RE Charnnan ot Commntee Programming instructor( AR 'H ·-l395 ): . 1r. Bob Pe rl Pro gram ming Directo r: .\J r.David Ori luU Acce pted ~--- ----- - - --- ------- ----- - ---- - ~ · Dean. lJlleg of An:hiLL'. cture May l '-191 Acknowledgments I would like to dedicate this program to the people who are most important to me. my family, for all the love and support they have given me over the years. I would especial 1\ like to recognize my mother and sister for their extra ef tort and support. COMPUTER ART CONCEPTUAL STUDIO AND EXHIBIT ENVIRONMENTS AN INVITATION i to the CUTTING EDGE OF v'*-'••< V i-f ( Lie ^E ''^^' +" 11^ /Vs CONTENTS I RESEARCH A. THESIS RESEARCH B. COMPUTER ART RESEARCH C RESEARCH SYNTHESIS D. THESIS CASE STUDIES II. THESIS STA t EMENT aiid THESIS VEHICLE III. CONTEXT A. CULTURAL CONTEXT and RESPONSE B. PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTEXT and RESPONSE C. BUILT CONTEXT and RESPONSE D. NATURAL CONTEXT and RESPONSE E. CONTEXT CASE STUDIES IV. ANALYSIS of ACTIVrnES A. DERNmON of PRIMARY ACTIVITIES B. DEHNmON of SECONDARY ACnVITIES V. ANALYSIS of SPACES A. RELATIONSHIPS of ACTIVmES to SPACES VI.
    [Show full text]