DOCSLIB.ORG

Proyecto Fotovoltaico Pachamama Manifestación De Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Particular

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proyecto Fotovoltaico Pachamama Manifestación De Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Particular Proyecto Fotovoltaico Pachamama Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Particular ENR AGS S.A. de C.V. (Grupo Neoen) Septiembre 2017 PROYECTO FOTOVOLTAICO PACHAMAMA SEPTIEMBRE 2017 CONTENIDO Contenido .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Figuras .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Tablas .................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Resumen Ejecutivo ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 I. Datos generales del Proyecto, del promovente y del responsable del estudio de impacto ambiental ............. 17 Proyecto .................................................................................................................................................................... 17 I.1.1. Nombre del Proyecto .................................................................................................................................... 17 I.1.2. Ubicación del Proyecto ................................................................................................................................. 17 I.1.3. Tiempo de vida útil del Proyecto ................................................................................................................. 17 I.1.4. Presentación de la documentación legal ..................................................................................................... 17 Promovente ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 I.2.1. Nombre o razón social .................................................................................................................................. 17 I.2.2. Registro Federal de Contribuyentes del promovente ............................................................................... 17 I.2.3. Nombre y cargo del representante legal ..................................................................................................... 17 I.2.4. Dirección del promovente o de su representante legal para recibir u oír notificaciones.................... 17 Responsable de la elaboración del estudio de impacto ambiental .................................................................. 18 I.3.1. Nombre o Razón Social ................................................................................................................................ 18 I.3.2. Registro Federal de Contribuyentes o CURP ............................................................................................ 18 I.3.3. Nombre del responsable técnico del estudio ............................................................................................. 18 I.3.1. Cedula Profesional ......................................................................................................................................... 18 I.3.2. Dirección del responsable técnico del estudio .......................................................................................... 18 II. Descripción del Proyecto ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Información general del Proyecto ...................................................................................................................... 19 II.1.1. Naturaleza del Proyecto ............................................................................................................................... 19 II.1.2. Selección del sitio.......................................................................................................................................... 19 II.1.3. Ubicación física del Proyecto y planos de localización .......................................................................... 20 II.1.4. Inversión requerida ...................................................................................................................................... 22 II.1.5. Dimensiones del Proyecto .......................................................................................................................... 22 II.1.6. Uso actual de suelo y/o cuerpos de agua en el sitio del proyecto y en sus colindancias .................. 22 II.1.7. Urbanización del área y descripción de servicios requeridos ................................................................ 22 Características Particulares del Proyecto ........................................................................................................... 24 II.2.1. Programa General de trabajo ...................................................................................................................... 26 II.2.2. Preparación del sitio ..................................................................................................................................... 28 2 PROYECTO FOTOVOLTAICO PACHAMAMA SEPTIEMBRE 2017 II.2.3. Descripción de obras y actividades provisionales del Proyecto ............................................................ 28 II.2.4. Etapa de construcción ................................................................................................................................. 29 II.2.5. Operación y mantenimiento ....................................................................................................................... 31 II.2.6. Descripción de las obras asociadas al Proyecto ....................................................................................... 32 II.2.7. Etapa de abandono del sitio........................................................................................................................ 32 II.2.8. Utilización de explosivos ............................................................................................................................. 33 II.2.9. Generación, manejo y disposición de residuos sólidos, líquidos y emisiones a la atmósfera ........... 34 II.2.10. Infraestructura para el Manejo y la Disposición Adecuada de los Residuos .................................... 36 III. Vinculación con los ordenamientos jurídicos aplicables en materia ambiental y, en su caso, con la regulación de uso de suelo ................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Ordenamientos jurídicos federales.................................................................................................................... 38 III.1.1. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013-2018.................................................................................................. 38 III.1.2. Programa Sectorial Nacional de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (PROMARNAT) 2013- 2018 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 39 Programa de ordenamiento ecológico del territorio (POET) ...................................................................... 40 Planes y Programas Estatales ............................................................................................................................. 43 III.3.1. Programa Estatal de Desarrollo Urbano (PDU) 2013 – 2035 ............................................................. 43 III.3.2. Programa Estatal de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial Aguascalientes 2013 -2035 .................. 43 Planes y Programas Municipales ....................................................................................................................... 56 III.4.1. Plan de desarrollo municipal ..................................................................................................................... 56 III.4.2. Programa Municipal de Ordenamiento Ecológico ................................................................................ 56 III.4.3. Programa Municipal de Desarrollo Urbano ........................................................................................... 56 Cumplimiento normativo ................................................................................................................................... 56 III.5.1. Disposiciones constitucionales ................................................................................................................. 56 III.5.2. Ley general del equilibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente (lgeepa) ......................................... 57 III.5.3. Legislación y Normatividad ....................................................................................................................... 60 III.5.1. Ley General de Cambio Climático ........................................................................................................... 61 III.5.2. Vinculación con la Ley de Protección Ambiental para el estado de Aguascalientes ........................ 61 III.5.3. Ley de la Industria Eléctrica .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument
    In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service This page left intentionally blank. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt, William L. Halvorson, and Pamela Anning Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B.F., Schmidt, C.A., Halvorson, W.L., and Anning, Pamela, 2008, Vascular plant and vertebrate inventory of Chiricahua National Monument: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1023, 104 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1023/]. Cover photo: Chiricahua National Monument. Photograph by National Park Service. Note: This report supersedes Schmidt et al. (2005). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering After Childbirth in the Mixtec Highlands (Mexico)
    M~DICAMENTSET ALIMENTS :L'APPROCHE ETHNOPHARMACOLOGIQLJE I 99 Recovering after childbirth in the Mixtec highlands (Mexico) KATZ Esther ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pourle Développement en Coopération) Département MAA (Milieu et Activités Agricoles) 213, rue Lafayette- 75480 PARIS Cedex 10 - FRANCE Fa: 33-1-40351713 RÉSUMÉ Les Indiens du haut pays mixtèque, tout comme d'autres Indiens du Mexique, prennent particulièrement soin des jeunes accouchées. Un certain nombre de travaux portent sur la grossesse et l'accouchement au Mexique, mais le thème du post- partum a été peu étudié en profondeur, bien que les indigknes insistent sur le danger et l'importance des soins à cette période. Dans ce travail, la conception, la grossesse et l'accouchement sont décrits à titre introductif, tandis que les pratiques du post- partum sont analysées en détail : la période de repos de 20 ou 40 jours, le régime alimentaire particulier, l'abstinence sexuelle, les diverses précautions et prohibitions, les soins corporels, les tisanes, les bains de plantes et surtout, le bain de vapeur, à fonction à la fois thérapeutique et rituelle. L'article posele problème de l'analyse des données touchant aux pratiques corpo- relles féminines, difficilement verbalisées. Il amorce également une comparaison avec les pratiques des pays industrialisés occidentaux et suggère de puiser dans les pratiques et les connaissances des sociétés dites << traditionnelles >> pour remédier aux dépressions post-partum. INTRODUCTION 1973;ALVAREZ JEYLlENREICH, 1976; COMINSKY, 1976 1982; QUEZADA 1977;RITA, 1979;L6PEZAUSTIN, Like most of the indigenous peoples of Mexico, the Mixtec AND 1980; GARCfARUIZANDPETRICH, 1983; IRETON, 1987; Indians view pregnancyas a disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rita Experimental Range: 100 Years (1903 to 2003) of Accomplishments and Contributions; Conference Proceedings; 2003 October 30–November 1; Tucson, AZ
    Michael A. Crimmins Theresa M. Mau-Crimmins Climate Variability and Plant Response at the Santa Rita Experimental Range, Arizona Abstract: Climatic variability is reflected in differential establishment, persistence, and spread of plant species. Although studies have investigated these relationships for some species and functional groups, few have attempted to characterize the specific sequences of climatic conditions at various temporal scales (subseasonal, seasonal, and interannual) associated with proliferation of particular species. Research has primarily focused on the climate conditions concurrent with or occurring just prior to a vegetation response. However, the cumulative effect of antecedent conditions taking place for several consecutive seasons may have a greater influence on plant growth. In this study, we tested whether the changes in overall cover of plant species can be explained by antecedent climate conditions. Temperature, precipitation, and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values at various lags were correlated with cover. PDSI had the strongest correlations for several drought-intolerant species at lags up to six seasons prior to the sampling date. Precipita- tion, surprisingly, did not correlate with species cover as strongly as PDSI. This is attributed to PDSI capturing soil moisture conditions, which are important to plant growth, better than raw precipi- tation measurements. Temperature correlations were weak and possessed little explanatory power as predictors of species cover. Acknowledgments: Data sets were provided by the Santa Rita Experimental Range Digital Database. Funding for the digitization of these data was provided by the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station and the University of Arizona. Introduction ______________________________________________________ Climatic variability is reflected in differential establishment, persistence, and spread of plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service
    Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Daniel G. Milchunas General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-169 April 2006 Milchunas, Daniel G. 2006. Responses of plant communities to grazing in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-169. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p. Abstract Grazing by wild and domestic mammals can have small to large effects on plant communities, depend- ing on characteristics of the particular community and of the type and intensity of grazing. The broad objective of this report was to extensively review literature on the effects of grazing on 25 plant commu- nities of the southwestern U.S. in terms of plant species composition, aboveground primary productiv- ity, and root and soil attributes. Livestock grazing management and grazing systems are assessed, as are effects of small and large native mammals and feral species, when data are available. Emphasis is placed on the evolutionary history of grazing and productivity of the particular communities as deter- minants of response. After reviewing available studies for each community type, we compare changes in species composition with grazing among community types. Comparisons are also made between southwestern communities with a relatively short history of grazing and communities of the adjacent Great Plains with a long evolutionary history of grazing. Evidence for grazing as a factor in shifts from grasslands to shrublands is considered. An appendix outlines a new community classification system, which is followed in describing grazing impacts in prior sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Del Bajío Y De Regiones Adyacentes
    FLORA DEL BAJÍO Y DE REGIONES ADYACENTES Fascículo Complementario XXII mayo de 2007 REVISIÓN Y ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL INVENTARIO DE LA FLORA ESPONTÁNEA DEL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO “EL CHARCO DEL INGENIO”, SAN MIGUEL DE ALLENDE, GUANAJUATO (MÉXICO) Por Walter L. Meagher Agua 22, Atascadero, San Miguel de Allende 37740 Guanajuato Rosamond Campbell CONTENIDO pág. A. Introducción 7 Preámbulo 7 Origen y propósito de El Charco 8 Sitio de estudio 8 Clima 10 Geomorfología regional 11 Geomorfología local 12 Geología 12 Suelos 13 B. Panorama de la vegetación 13 Matorral xerófilo y pastizal 13 El Cardonal 14 La hibridación en Opuntia 15 Distribución de otras plantas crasas 15 Suculencia 16 Orchidaceae 17 Árboles pequeños 17 Arbustos 17 Plantas vasculares inferiores 19 Plantas bajas y rastreras 20 Diversidad de pastos 20 Malezas 21 C. Hábitats y microhábitats 22 Introducción 22 Parque Landeta 23 La Fuga del Tubo Roto 24 Al oeste del Tubo Roto 25 La Ladera de los Helechos 25 La Cueva de Caolín 26 Los bordes de la cañada 27 El lado sur 27 El lado norte 28 Las paredes de la cañada 28 El fondo de la cañada 30 La Cuesta Norte 31 Las especies herbáceas y suculentas 32 del centro del pastizal La Peña de las Burseras 32 El Tubo 33 La ladera oeste de la cuesta 34 El extremo de la ladera oeste de la 35 cuesta Zonas húmedas 35 Flora del Arroyo la Longaniza 36 Humedales del extremo este 37 Pastizal y matorral xerófilo arriba del 38 humedal La ribera norte de la presa 38 Zonas húmedas bajo la cortina 39 Áreas de filtración 39 Pozas temporales 40 Lodos 40 Plano de inundación A 40 Plano de inundación B 40 Fisuras en las rocas 41 Vegetación de la isla 41 Las salientes rocosas sobre el arroyo 41 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclassification of North American Haplopappus (Compositae: Astereae) Completed: Rayjacksonia Gen
    AmericanJournal of Botany 83(3): 356-370. 1996. RECLASSIFICATION OF NORTH AMERICAN HAPLOPAPPUS (COMPOSITAE: ASTEREAE) COMPLETED: RAYJACKSONIA GEN. NOV.1 MEREDITH A. LANE2 AND RONALD L. HARTMAN R. L. McGregor Herbarium(University of Kansas NaturalHistory Museum Division of Botany) and Departmentof Botany,University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047-3729; and Rocky MountainHerbarium, Department of Botany,University of Wyoming,Laramie, Wyoming82071-3165 Rayjacksonia R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, gen. nov. (Compositae: Astereae), is named to accommodate the "phyllo- cephalus complex," formerlyof Haplopappus Cass. sect. Blepharodon DC. The new combinationsare R. phyllocephalus (DC.) R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, R. annua (Rydb.) R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, and R. aurea (A. Gray) R. L. Hartman & M. A. Lane. This transfercompletes the reclassificationof the North American species of Haplopappus sensu Hall, leaving that genus exclusively South American.Rayjacksonia has a base chromosomenumber of x = 6. Furthermore,it shares abruptlyampliate disk corollas, deltatedisk style-branchappendages, and corolla epidermalcell type,among other features,with Grindelia, Isocoma, Olivaea, Prionopsis, Stephanodoria, and Xanthocephalum.Phylogenetic analyses of morphologicaland chloroplastDNA restrictionsite data, taken together,demonstrate that these genera are closely related but distinct. Key words: Astereae; Asteraceae; Compositae; Haplopappus; Rayjacksonia. During the past seven decades, taxonomic application lopappus sensu Hall (1928) are reclassifiedand are cur-
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for Managing Yellow and Caucasian (Old World) Bluestems in the Southwest
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture - Field Guide for Managing Yellow and Caucasian (Old World) Bluestems in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-36 October 2018 Cover Photos Top left — Yellow bluestem; courtesy photo by Max Licher, SEINet Top right — Yellow bluestem panicle; courtesy photo by Billy Warrick; Soil, Crop and More Information Lower left — Caucasian bluestem panicle; courtesy photo by Max Licher, SEINet Lower right — Caucasian bluestem; courtesy photo by Max Licher, SEINet Authors Karen R. Hickman — Professor, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK Keith Harmoney — Range Scientist, KSU Ag Research Center, Hays KS Allen White — Region 3 Pesticides/Invasive Species Coord., Forest Service, Albuquerque NM Citation: USDA Forest Service. 2018. Field Guide for Managing Yellow and Caucasian (Old World) Bluestems in the Southwest. Southwestern Region TP-R3-16-36, Albuquerque, NM. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Números Cromosómicos De Asteraceae De La Reserva Ecológica Del Pedregal De San Ángel (REPSA), México, Distrito Federal
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 383-393, 2011 Números cromosómicos de Asteraceae de la Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel (REPSA), México, Distrito Federal Chromosome numbers in Asteraceae of the Ecological Reserve of the Pedregal de San Ángel (REPSA), Mexico City, Mexico Fabiola Soto-Trejo1, 2*, Guadalupe Palomino1 y José Luis Villaseñor2 1 Laboratorio de Citogenética, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., México. 2Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-233 , 04510 México, D.F., México. *Correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen. Se registraron los números cromosómicos mitóticos o meióticos de 31 especies de Asteraceae en la Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel (REPSA), y por primera vez, los conteos cromosómicos de 3 especies endémicas de México: Acourtia cordata (2n= 54), Ageratina cylindrica (2n= 34) y Viguiera buddleiiformis (n= 17). Se discuten los resultados obtenidos de acuerdo con los datos disponibles para cada especie analizada. Palabras clave: números cromosómicos, Asteraceae, Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel, México, Distrito Federal. Abstract. Mitotic or meiotic chromosome numbers are recorded for 31 species of Asteraceae growing in the Ecological Reserve of the Pedregal de San Angel (REPSA), Mexico City. The chromosome counts of 3 species endemic to Mexico are recorded for the first time: Acourtia cordata (2n= 54), Ageratina cilyndrica (2n= 34), and Viguiera buddleiiformis (n= 17). The results are discussed in relation to the available data for each of the analyzed taxa. Key words: chromosome numbers, Asteraceae, Ecological Reserve of the Pedregal de San Ángel, Mexico City, Distrito Federal.
    [Show full text]