Glantz Vol III Companion LATEST.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Glantz Vol III Companion LATEST.Indd © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xix Index Maps xxiii Appendix 1. Opposing Orders of Battle, 19 November 1942– 1 February 1943 1 Appendix 2. Soviet Strategic Planning and the Genesis of Plan Uranus 82 Appendix 3. The Uranus Force and Plan 105 Appendix 4. The Balance of Opposing Forces 126 Appendix 5. The Penetration Battle and Encirclement, 19–23 November 1942 138 Appendix 6. Reducing the Stalingrad Pocket and Forming the Outer Encirclement Front, 24–27 November 1942 189 Appendix 7. Reducing the Stalingrad Pocket and the Outer Encirclement Front, 28–30 November 1942 218 Appendix 8. Competing German and Soviet Dilemmas 251 Appendix 9. The Southwestern Front’s Battles along the Krivaia and Chir Rivers, 1–15 December 1942 279 Appendix 10. The Stalingrad Front’s Defense against Operation Wintergewitter [Winter Tempest], 1–19 December 1942 299 Appendix 11. The Don and Stalingrad Fronts’ Battle for the Stalingrad Pocket, 1–15 December 1942 343 Appendix 12. Operation Little Saturn and the Soviet Tormosin Offensive, 16–31 December 1942 379 Appendix 13. The End of Wintergewitter and Donnerschlag [Thunder Clap] and the Stalingrad Front’s Kotel’nikovo Offensive, 16–31 December 1942 417 Appendix 14. The Stalingrad Pocket, 16–31 December 1942 462 Appendix 15. Sixth Army’s Situation, Preliminaries, and the Don Front’s Plan, 1–9 January 1943 491 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents Appendix 16. Destruction: The First Stage, 10–17 January 1943 504 Appendix 17. Destruction: The Second Stage, 18–25 January 1943 537 Appendix 18. Destruction: The Finale, 26 January–2 February 1943 569 Appendix 19. 62nd Army’s Struggle in Stalingrad City, 19 November 1942–2 February 1943 617 Appendix 20. Conclusions 795 Index to Orders of Battle, Documents, and Tables 809 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Maps, Tables, and Illustrations MAPS 1. Fourth Panzer Army’s situation at 0000 hours on 5 December 1942 302 2. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 12 December 1942 312 3. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 13 December 1942 315 4. General Raus’s perception of the battle at Verkhne-Kumskii, 13 [14–18] December 1942 321 5. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 14 December 1942 327 6. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 15 December 1942 329 7. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 16 December 1942 330 8. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 17 December 1942 332 9. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 18 December 1942 334 10. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 19 December 1942 335 11. The situation in Stalingrad on 1 December 1942 353 12. The situation in Stalingrad on 8 December 1942 367 13. Army Group Hollidt’s (Romanian Third Army’s) situation on 31 December 1942 410 14. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 20 December 1942 432 15. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 21 December 1942 435 16. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance on 23 December 1942 439 17. The Stalingrad Front’s Kotel’nikovo offensive, 24–31 December 1942 453 18. LVII Panzer Corps’ defense on 25 December 1942 455 19. The Don Front’s operation Kol’tso [Ring], 10 January–2 February 1943 535 20. 21st Army’s operations, 10–12 January 1943 536 21. 21st Army’s operations, 21–25 January 1943 567 22. The Stalingrad pocket [Kessel], 23 January 1943: A German Perspective 568 23. 21st Army’s operations, 26–30 January 1943 610 24. 64th Army’s operations, 10 January–2 February 1943 611 25. 66th Army’s operations, 10–31 January 1943 612 26. 45th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 19 November 1942 618 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. x Maps, Tables, and Illustrations 27. 95th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 19 November 1942 619 28. 95th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 20 November 1942 622 29. 92nd Separate Rifle Brigade’s positions on 21 November 1942 624 30. 45th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 23 November 1942 626 31. 45th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 29 November 1942 628 32. 92nd Separate Rifle Brigade’s positions on 27 November 1942 629 33. 13th Guards Rifle Division’s positions, 27 November– 4 December 1942 630 34. 284th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 14 December 1942 639 35. 95th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 15 December 1942 641 36. 92nd Separate Rifle Brigade’s positions at 2000 hours on 15 December 1942 642 37. 138th Rifle Division’s defenses at 1800 hours on 16 December 1942 644 38. 95th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 19 December 1942 647 39. 138th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 21 December 1942 655 40. The situation in Stalingrad on 22 December 1942 657 41. 95th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 22 December 1942 658 42. 95th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 25 December 1942 664 43. 45th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 25 December 1942 665 44. 45th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 30 December 1942 676 45. The situation in Stalingrad on 2 January 1943 686 46. 156th Fortified Region’s positions at 2000 hours on 2 January 1943 687 47. 284th Rifle Division’s attack plan, 8 January 1943 700 48. 138th Rifle Division’s positions on 11–12 January 1943 709 49. 138th Rifle Division’s actions on 13 January 1943 715 50. 284th Rifle Division’s positions at 2000 hours on 14 January 1943 719 51. 138th Rifle Division’s positions on 14–16 January 1943 720 52. 138th Rifle Division’s positions at 1900 hours on 20 January 1943 736 53. 284th Rifle Division’s positions on 30–31 January 1943 761 54. 284th Rifle Division’s actions on 2 February 1943 770 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Maps, Tables, and Illustrations xi PHOTOGRAPHS (following p. 612) Lieutenant General Vasilii Ivanovich Chuikov Division Commissar Kuz’ma Akimovich Gurov Major General Nikolai Ivanovich Krylov Major General Aleksandr Il’ich Rodimtsev Major General Stepan Savel’evich Gur’ev Colonel Vasilii Akimovich Gorishnyi Colonel Ivan Il’ich Liudnikov, commander of 138th Rifle Division, with his deputy commander for political affairs, N. I. Titov, his chief of staff, V. I. Shuba, and his chief of artillery, S. Ia. Tychinsky Colonel Nikolai Filippovich Batiuk, commander of 284th Rifle Division, in his command bunker (following p. 774) Stalingrad (Volgograd today) from the Volga River westward toward the Factory district (Krasnyi Oktiabr’ sector) Stalingrad from the Volga River westward toward the Factory district (Tractor Factory sector) Ruins in the Factory district Ruins of dugouts on the Volga River’s western bank in the Factory district Houses Nos. 77 and 78 on Lenin Prospect (on Liudnikov’s island) Entrance to a house on Lenin Prospect (on Liudnikov’s island) Ruins of the Rote Haus [Red House], the headquarters of Colonel Liudnikov’s 138th Rifle Division Ruins of the Kommissarhaus [Commissar House] (on Luidnikov’s island) The infamous fuel tanks southeast of the Barrikady factory Southward along the railroad west of the Krasnyi Oktiabr’ factory toward Mamaev Kurgan, with the victory monument in the distance Westward from the Volga River toward Mamaev Kurgan and the postwar monument to victory Stalingrad from Mamaev Kurgan eastward toward the Volga River Stalingrad from Mamaev Kurgan northward across the Bannyi ravine toward the Factory district (Krasnyi Oktiabr’) Stalingrad from Mamaev Kurgan westward toward Hill 112.0 and Stalingradskii Stalingrad from Mamaev Kurgan southeastward across the Dolgii and Krutoi ravines toward the northern part of the city center The ruins of Pavlov’s house on the eastern side of the 9th of January Square, with the inscription “Feats of arms and labor mingled together in this house.” “We stood up for your native Stalingrad!” © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. xii Maps, Tables, and Illustrations The ruins of the Mill building (Lieutenant Zabolotnyi’s house) next to Pavlov’s house Stalingrad’s Railroad Station No. 1 The front of the Univermag [department store] on the Square of Fallen Heroes, in whose basement Field Marshal von Paulus surrendered The entrance to Field Marshal Paulus’s headquarters in the basement of the Univermag The Theater on the 1st of May Square The landing stage on the Volga’s western bank in central Stalingrad (now east of the Avenue of Heroes) Eastward to the Volga River from the Square of Fallen Heroes Southeastward from Pushkinskaia and Krasnoznamennskaia streets along the Tsaritsa River valley to the Volga River The grain elevator in southern Stalingrad from the southwest Inside the top floor of the grain elevator From the grain elevator southward toward the El’shanka River and El’shanka From the grain elevator eastward toward the Volga River From the grain elevator northeastward toward the Tsaritsa River (the tall building with cranes on top on the left side) General Paulus’s headquarters in Golubinskaia From Paulus’s headquarters toward the Golubaia River A German cemetery at Bol’shaia Rossoshka A German war memorial near Peschanka TABLES 1. The Distribution of Replacement Personnel and Weapons Sent to the Red Army’s Operating Fronts during the Period from 1 October to 20 November 1942 126 2. The Strength of the Soviet Fronts Conducting the Stalingrad Counteroffensive (Operation Uranus) 127 3.
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Soviet/Russian Western Group of Forces in Germany 1945-1994
    Copyright by Elliott Carson Nowacky 2012 The Thesis Committee for Elliott Carson Nowacky Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: From Occupation to Withdrawal: A Short History of the Soviet/Russian Western Group of Forces in Germany 1945-1994 APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Thomas J. Garza Bella B. Jordan From Occupation to Withdrawal: A Short History of the Soviet/Russian Western Group of Forces in Germany 1945-1994 by Elliott Carson Nowacky, B.A History Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin August 2012 Dedication To my late parents Ed and Catherine. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the help of many people. I would like to thank Professor Thomas Garza and Dr. Bella Bychkova-Jordan for their guidance, constructive criticism and ever present enthusiasm during the writing process. My appreciation also goes to Andriy, Elena and Yuri at the NovaMova Language Institute in Kiev. Andriy, who is also one of the people I interviewed for this project, went above the call of duty in arranging an additional interview with another ZGV veteran in L’viv for me during my short time in Ukraine. Yuri helped me slog through Michael Boltunov’s Gorkaya Doroga Domoi and Elena assisted in preparing my interview questions in Russian. Kudos are also in order for Jay K. and Brandon P, my former “battle buddies” here at UT; Thanks for helping a middle-aged graduate student remain sane.
    [Show full text]
  • East German TO&Es 1980-1989 V1.3
    East German TO&Es 1980-1989 v1.3 BATTLEGROUP CWEG-01 (a) The East German Army (NVA) had x2 Panzer Divisions (7th & Panzer Division 1980s (a) 9th) and x4 Panzer-Grenadier Divisions (1st, 4th, 8th & 11th). These were grouped into two higher administrative formations – the BATTLEGROUPS 3rd and 5th Military Districts. Each Military District had x1 Panzer Division and x2 Panzer-Grenadier Divisions, plus Army Support BG CWEG-03 Assets. Some sources record these formations as ‘Armies’, but in x3 Panzer Regiment reality the Military Districts were administrative formations only. In war the six East German divisions would have come under the BG CWEG-04 command of five of the six Soviet Armies in Germany (28th, 2nd Guards, 8th Guards, 20th Guards & 3rd Shock Armies, but not 1st x1 Panzer-Grenadier Regiment (Tracked) Guards Army), while the East German Army support assets would form the Army Troops of 2nd Guards Army and 8th Guards Army. BG CWEG-08 Consequently, East German divisions could have Soviet Army x1 Panzer-Reconnaissance Battalion Troops in support and vice versa. The East Germans were widely regarded as the most reliable of all Warpac armies (the expression ‘There’s none so fanatical as a convert’ springs to mind) and in x1 Pioneer Battalion (b) some cases were regarded as more combat-efficient than many Soviet units in Germany. FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENTS (b) The Divisional Pioneer Battalion had a single Pioneer Company that could be considered an ME for game purposes (ME CWEG- FSE CWEG-05 14), while the rest of the battalion consisted of road-building, Divisional Artillery Regiment bridging, amphibian, position preparation and demolition equipment, which is unlikely to feature very heavily in a game.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 10-Final Cover
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN Issue 10 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. March 1998 Leadership Transition in a Fractured Bloc Featuring: CPSU Plenums; Post-Stalin Succession Struggle and the Crisis in East Germany; Stalin and the Soviet- Yugoslav Split; Deng Xiaoping and Sino-Soviet Relations; The End of the Cold War: A Preview COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN 10 The Cold War International History Project EDITOR: DAVID WOLFF CO-EDITOR: CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN ADVISING EDITOR: JAMES G. HERSHBERG ASSISTANT EDITOR: CHRISTA SHEEHAN MATTHEW RESEARCH ASSISTANT: ANDREW GRAUER Special thanks to: Benjamin Aldrich-Moodie, Tom Blanton, Monika Borbely, David Bortnik, Malcolm Byrne, Nedialka Douptcheva, Johanna Felcser, Drew Gilbert, Christiaan Hetzner, Kevin Krogman, John Martinez, Daniel Rozas, Natasha Shur, Aleksandra Szczepanowska, Robert Wampler, Vladislav Zubok. The Cold War International History Project was established at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C., in 1991 with the help of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and receives major support from the MacArthur Foundation and the Smith Richardson Foundation. The Project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to disseminate new information and perspectives on Cold War history emerging from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side”—the former Communist bloc—through publications, fellowships, and scholarly meetings and conferences. Within the Wilson Center, CWIHP is under the Division of International Studies, headed by Dr. Robert S. Litwak. The Director of the Cold War International History Project is Dr. David Wolff, and the incoming Acting Director is Christian F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issues of War with Japan Coverage in the Presidential Project «Fundamental Multi-Volume Work» the Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «»
    Vyatcheslav Zimonin Captain (Russia NAVY) Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Military University, Honored Scientist Of The Russian Federation and Academy of Natural Sciences The issues of war with Japan coverage in the Presidential project «Fundamental multi-volume work» The Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «» Fundamental multi-volume work «The Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945» is being developed in accordance with the Decree № 240-рп of May 5, 2008 of the President of the Russian Federation. The work is developed under the organizational leadership of the main drafting committee headed by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Army General Sergey Shoigu. Major General V.A. Zolotarev, well-known Russian scientist, Doctor of Historical and Legal Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Natural Sciences, State Councilor of the Russian Federation Deputy Chairman of the GRK is appointed as scientific director of the multi-volume work. Fundamental structure of a multivolume work: Volume 1 - «The main facts of the war,» Volume 2 - «The origin and the beginning of the war» Volume 3 - «Battles and actions that changed the course of the war,» Volume 4 - «Freeing of the USSR, 1944 « Volume 5 - «The final victory. Final operations of World War II in Europe. War with Japan « Volume 6 - «The Secret War. Intelligence and counterintelligence in the Great Patriotic War « Volume 7 - «Economy and weapons of war» Volume 8 - «Foreign policy and diplomacy of the Soviet Union during the war» Volume 9 - «Allies of the USSR in the war» Volume 10 - «The power, society and war» Volume 11 - «Policy and Strategy of Victory.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Krym Nash': an Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare
    ‘Krym Nash’: An Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare ‘De Krim is van ons’ Een analyse van hedendaagse Russische wijze van oorlogvoeren – inmenging door misleiding (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 16 december 2020 des middags te 12.45 uur door Albert Johan Hendrik Bouwmeester geboren op 25 mei 1962 te Enschede Promotoren: Prof. dr. B.G.J. de Graaff Prof. dr. P.A.L. Ducheine Dit proefschrift werd mede mogelijk gemaakt met financiële steun van het ministerie van Defensie. ii Table of contents Table of contents .................................................................................................. iii List of abbreviations ............................................................................................ vii Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vii Country codes .................................................................................................................................................... ix American State Codes ....................................................................................................................................... ix List of figures ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Battle Organisation of the Soviet Units
    Orders of Battle Organisation of the Soviet units Some of the great historical information we just didn’t have These organisations allow you to also see why certain enough room to include in Hammer and Sickle were the battalions have the number of combat companies they complete organisations and orders of battle of the four Soviet have. For example you can see that the reason a Hammer corps featured in the book. This PDF includes a breakdown and Sickle Tankovy Batalon can have three Tankovy of all four corps. Companies is because the 1st Mechanised Corps’ tank regiments had two battalions of three companies rather One thing we did a little differently for these orders of battle than the more normal three battalions of two compa- was to display the companies and platoons using the Flames nies of the tank corps or the three battalions of two Of War terms. This is intended to give you a better idea of medium tank companies and a light tank company of the where in the larger structure of a Soviet corps your Combat, 3rd Mechanised Corps. Weapons, and Support companies and platoons come from. I hope you find these orders of battle useful, or at least Another reason to include orders of battle is as a resource interesting, as you go about creating your Soviet force from for those looking to theme their force on a particular units. Hammer and Sickle. Where the information is available we have tried to give the types of guns and vehicles in the units. This allows your to Wayne Turner work out which corps’ weapons and tanks spark your interest and help direct you to the most suitable Flames Of War company or platoon.
    [Show full text]
  • River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: the Soviet Experience
    The Journal of Slavic Military Studies ISSN: 1351-8046 (Print) 1556-3006 (Online) Journal homepage: http://tandfonline.com/loi/fslv20 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau To cite this article: Lester W. Grau (2016) River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29:1, 73-98, DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 Published online: 16 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 51 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fslv20 Download by: [Combined Arms Research Library] Date: 09 May 2016, At: 10:45 JOURNAL OF SLAVIC MILITARY STUDIES 2016, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 73–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau Foreign Military Studies Oce ABSTRACT In the history of warfare, ground and naval forces frequently have to cooperate. There are usually problems putting these two forces together since their missions, equipment, training, communications and mutual unfamiliarity get in the way. These problems are common during transport of ground force equipment and personnel aboard naval vessels, exacer- bated during amphibious landings and assaults and very di- cult when operating together along major rivers. This article analyzes the Soviet history of defensive river otilla combat during the rst period of the Great Patriotic War (World War II against Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Glantz Vol III Book 1 LATEST.Indd
    © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xxi Part I. Soviet Strategic Planning 1. Framework for Disaster 3 Frustration 3 The Wehrmacht in November 1942 8 German Field Commanders 11 The Red Army in November 1942 12 Soviet Field Commanders 15 2. Soviet Strategic Planning: The Genesis of Plan Uranus 20 Who Formulated Plan Uranus? The Historical Debate 20 Competing Offensive Concepts 23 Triumph of the “Different Solution,” 1–13 October 31 Plan Uranus Takes Shape, 14–31 October 38 Final Preparations, 1–18 November 41 Reflections 50 3. Gathering the Troops: Soviet Order of Battle and the Uranus Plan 55 Regrouping Forces for the Counteroffensive 55 Soviet Order of Battle 58 The Uranus Plan 79 Front and Army Plans 93 4. The Balance of Opposing Forces on 18 November 127 Soviet Forces 127 Axis Forces and Defenses 131 The Correlation of Opposing Forces 165 Part II. The Uranus Counteroffensive 5. The Penetration Battle, 19–20 November 185 Preliminaries 185 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 19–20 November 192 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 20 November 248 6. The Encirclement Closes, 21–23 November 268 German Dilemmas on 21 November 268 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 21 November 271 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 21 November 288 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 22 November 299 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 22 November 323 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 23 November 337 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 23 November 358 The Situation Late on 23 November 369 German Dilemmas on 23 November 371 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Playbook Part 1
    MBT Playbook 1 PLAYBOOK GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www.GMTGames.com © 2016 GMT Games, LLC 2 MBT Playbook TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.0 TO&Es . 2 9.2.3 Point Values of Units . 6 8.1 Military Formations . 2 9.2.4 Objectives . 7 8.1.1 Headquarters – HQ . 2 9.2.4.1 Meeting Engagement . 7 8.1.2 Ad-Hoc Formations . 2 9.2.4.2 Delaying Action . 7 8.1.2.1 Over-Strength Formations . 2 9.2.4.3 Defensive Engagement . 7 8.1.2.2 Under-Strength Formations . 2 9.2.4.4 Counterattack . 7 8.2 Unit Summary Charts . 3 9.2.5 Determining Victory Margin . 7 8.2.1 Individual Units . 3 10.0 27 September 1987 . 8 8.2.2 Point Values . 3 10.1 Overview . 8 8.2.2.1 Vehicle, Towed & Helicopter Point Values . 3 10.2 Soviet OB . 9 8.2.2.2 Leg Unit Point Values . 3 10.2.1 Group of Soviet Forces Germany (GSFG) . 9 8.2.2.3 Artillery Battery Unit Point Values . 3 10.2.2 Central Group of Forces (CGF) . 9 8.2.2.4 Fixed-Wing Aircraft Point Values . 3 10.3 NATO OB . 9 9.0 The Scenarios . 3 10.3.1 NATO CENTAG (US 7th Army) . 9 9.1 Scenario Format . 3 10.3.2 NATO NORTHAG (BAOR) . 9 9.1.1 Situation . 3 NATO TO&E . 11 9.1.2 Map . 3 SOVIET TO&E . 15 9.1.3 Setup . 3 US Unit Summary Chart .
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Armed Forces Order of Battle 1988
    Central Group of Forces Version 3.0.0 Central Group of Forces [Czechoslovakia] (Централъная Группа Войск (ЦГВ)) (Tsentral’naya Gruppa Voisk (SGV)) (II Formation) Version 3.0.0 17 February 2007 Headquarters: Milovice, Czechoslovakian Democratic Republic Commander-in-Chief: General-Colonel E. A. Vorob’ev (appointed December 1987) 28th Army Corps 15th Guards Tank Division 18th Guards Motorized Rifle Division 48th Motorized Rifle Division Independent Assets History: This is actually the second formation of the Central Group of Forces. The first one was formed in June 1945, controlling the occupation forces in Czechoslovakia, Austria and Hungary (see Appendix 4). It was disbanded in 1955 when the forces in Austria and Hungary were withdrawn from those countries. The second formation occurred as a result of the Warsaw Pact invasion Czechoslovakia in August 1968. As a result of a directive issued on 16 October 1968, on 24 October 1968 the Headquarters of the Central Group of Forces was re-established, this time for forces solely on Czech territory. These forces would remain “temporarily” until, as a result of the agreement signed between Czechoslovakia and the USSR, all Soviet forces are to be withdrawn by July 1991. This was agreement was fulfilled when on 27 June 1911 the Headquarters, Central Group of Forces was disbanded with the departure of the last Soviet forces. A. Group-level Assets: 1. Group Headquarters – Milovice, Czechoslovakia 2. Combat units: a. 259th Independent Security & Protection Battalion – b. 901st Air Assault Battalion – Riechki c. 680th Independent Special Purpose Company [SPETSNAZ] – Bogdanech d. 155th Helicopter Regiment (+) – Mimoň-Hradčany 1. 426th Independent Aerodome-Technical Support Battalion (attached) d.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario Book TABLE of CONTENTS
    Scenario Book TABLE OF CONTENTS RS1: Morning Recon ...............................................................2 RS19: Air Interdiction ............................................................30 RS2: Operation Boloski ...........................................................3 RS20: Birds of Prey ...............................................................31 RS3: First Strike .......................................................................4 RS21: Breakthrough ...............................................................33 RS4: Opening Rounds..............................................................6 RS22: BUFFs .........................................................................34 RS5: Vertical Envelopment ......................................................7 RS23: Bridge Busting ...........................................................36 RS6: Sanitized Corridors .........................................................9 RS24: I Must Break You ........................................................37 RS7: Aerial Blockade .............................................................10 RS25: Day of Days ................................................................39 RS8: Runway Busting ............................................................12 RS26: Belgian Barrage ..........................................................40 RS9: Nighthawks ...................................................................14 RS27: High Speed Recon .......................................................42 RS10: Frontal
    [Show full text]