DOCSLIB.ORG

Gfe Full Program 13.02.2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gfe Full Program 13.02.2019 Joint Meeting of the German and Israeli Societies of Developmental Biology Vienna, February 17-20, 2019 https://gfe2019.univie.ac.at/home/ Organizers Ulrich Technau, Eli Arama Co-Organizers Michael Brand, Fred Berger, Elly Tanaka, David Sprinzak, Peleg Hasson GfE https://www.vbio.de/gfe-entwicklungsbiologie IsSDB http://issdb.org Gesellschaft für Entwicklungsbiologie e.V. Geschäftsstelle: Dr. Thomas Thumberger Centre for Organismal Studies Universität Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 230 69120 Heidelberg E-mail: [email protected] Contents Sponsors ......................................................................................................................................... 4 General information ..................................................................................................................... 5 Venue .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Getting there................................................................................................................................ 5 From the airport ...................................................................................................................... 6 If you come by long distance train .......................................................................................... 6 Taxi ......................................................................................................................................... 6 If you come by car .................................................................................................................. 6 Transportation in town ............................................................................................................ 6 Useful links for planning your journey ....................................................................................... 6 Registration ................................................................................................................................. 7 Cloak room.................................................................................................................................. 7 Information for speakers ............................................................................................................. 7 Poster sessions ............................................................................................................................ 7 Internet access ............................................................................................................................. 7 Coffee breaks and welcome reception ........................................................................................ 7 Lunch breaks ............................................................................................................................... 8 Conference dinner ....................................................................................................................... 8 Invited Speakers Dinner .............................................................................................................. 9 Awards ........................................................................................................................................ 9 GfE members meeting / IsSDB members meeting ..................................................................... 9 Floor plan of the venue ................................................................................................................. 9 Overview of the sessions ............................................................................................................. 10 Scientific program ....................................................................................................................... 11 Sunday, February 17th ............................................................................................................... 11 Monday, February 18th (morning session) ................................................................................ 12 Tuesday, February 19th (morning session) ................................................................................ 14 Wednesday, February 20th ........................................................................................................ 16 Numbers, presenting authors and titles of the posters ............................................................ 17 A Developmental Cell Biology ............................................................................................... 17 B Neural Development ............................................................................................................ 19 D Single cell approaches ......................................................................................................... 20 E Biophysics of Development ................................................................................................ 21 F New Techniques .................................................................................................................. 21 G Genomic and system approaches of development ............................................................... 21 H Regeneration ........................................................................................................................ 21 I Polarity and axis formation ................................................................................................. 22 J Germline and early cleavages .............................................................................................. 22 K Organogenesis ..................................................................................................................... 22 L EvoDevo .............................................................................................................................. 23 Abstracts of talks (in order of presentation) ............................................................................ 25 Developmental Cell Biology..................................................................................................... 25 Neural Development ................................................................................................................. 33 Stem cells, organoids and disease ............................................................................................. 39 Single cell approaches............................................................................................................... 42 Biophysics of Development ...................................................................................................... 46 IsSDB award ............................................................................................................................. 50 Genomic and system approaches of development .................................................................... 51 Regeneration ............................................................................................................................. 56 2 GfE PhD award ......................................................................................................................... 60 Germline and early cleavages ................................................................................................... 65 GfE Klaus Sander Award .......................................................................................................... 69 Organogenesis ........................................................................................................................... 70 EvoDevo and emerging models ................................................................................................ 74 Poster abstracts ........................................................................................................................... 78 A Developmental Cell Biology ............................................................................................... 78 B Neural Development .......................................................................................................... 126 C Stem cells, organoids and disease ..................................................................................... 137 D Single cell approaches ....................................................................................................... 149 E Biophysics of Development .............................................................................................. 153 F New Techniques ................................................................................................................ 159 G Genomic and system approaches of development ............................................................. 162 H Regeneration ...................................................................................................................... 167 I Polarity and axis formation ............................................................................................... 177 J Germline and early cleavages ............................................................................................ 181 K Organogenesis ................................................................................................................... 183 L EvoDevo ............................................................................................................................ 198 Participants ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bodily Complexity: Integrated Multicellular Organizations for Contraction-Based Motility
    fphys-10-01268 October 11, 2019 Time: 16:13 # 1 HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 15 October 2019 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01268 Bodily Complexity: Integrated Multicellular Organizations for Contraction-Based Motility Argyris Arnellos1,2* and Fred Keijzer3 1 IAS-Research Centre for Life, Mind & Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain, 2 Department of Product and Systems Design Engineering, Complex Systems and Service Design Lab, University of the Aegean, Syros, Greece, 3 Department of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Compared to other forms of multicellularity, the animal case is unique. Animals—barring some exceptions—consist of collections of cells that are connected and integrated to such an extent that these collectives act as unitary, large free-moving entities capable of sensing macroscopic properties and events. This animal configuration Edited by: Matteo Mossio, is so well-known that it is often taken as a natural one that ‘must’ have evolved, UMR8590 Institut d’Histoire et given environmental conditions that make large free-moving units ‘obviously’ adaptive. de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST), France Here we question the seemingly evolutionary inevitableness of animals and introduce Reviewed by: a thesis of bodily complexity: The multicellular organization characteristic for typical Stuart A. Newman, animals requires the integration of a multitude of intrinsic bodily features between its New York Medical
    [Show full text]
  • THU APRIL 21 – SUN APRIL 24 in TQW / Studios and TQW / Halle G
    THU APRIL 21 – SUN APRIL 24 in TQW / Studios and TQW / Halle G ARCHIVES TO COME SCORES N°11 / / ATELIER EDN — EUROPEAN DANCEHOUSE NETWORK Perjovschi (c) Dan CALENDAR ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- MON 18 – SAT 23 APRIL FRI 22 APRIL SAT 23 APRIL SUN 24 APRIL 10.45 h – 12.30 h in TQW / Studios 14.00 h – 17.30 h in Leopold Museum / ongoning at TQW / Studios Passage ongoning at TQW / Studios Passage SHANNON COONEY unteres Atrium DAN PERJOVSCHI DAN PERJOVSCHI TRAINING Legible Archive SIOBHAN DAVIES DANCE Black Belt Drawing Black Belt Drawing Table of Contents ----------------------------------- 12.00 h – 17.30 h in Leopold Museum / 10.30 h – 15.00 h in Leopold Museum / 15.00 h in TQW / Studios Passage unteres Atrium unteres Atrium THU 21 – SAT 23 APRIL DAN PERJOVSCHI SIOBHAN DAVIES DANCE SIOBHAN DAVIES DANCE 13.00 h – 15.30 h in TQW / Studios Black Belt Drawing Table of Contents Table of Contents CLAUDIA BOSSE + GUESTS WORKSHOP The archive as a body, 16.00 h – 21.00 h in TQW / Studios 16.00 h – 21.00 h in TQW / Studios 12.00 h in TQW / Studios the body as an archive DANIEL ASCHWANDEN + DANIEL ASCHWANDEN + FUTURE ARCHIVES CONNY ZENK CONNY ZENK with ARKADI ZAIDES, ----------------------------------- INSTALLATION OPENING INSTALLATION Mobil[e]_migration DAN PERJOVSCHI, Mobil[e]_migration SIOBHAN DAVIES + THU 21 APRIL 16.00 h – 21.00 h in TQW / Studios SCOTT DELAHUNTA, PENELOPE 16.00 h – 21.00 h in TQW / Studios 16.00 h – 21.00 h in
    [Show full text]
  • Mesodermal Anatomies in Cnidarian Polyps and Medusae
    Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50: 589-599 (2006) doi: 10.1387/ijdb.062150ks Review Mesodermal anatomies in cnidarian polyps and medusae KATJA SEIPEL and VOLKER SCHMID* Institute of Zoology, University of Basel, Biocenter/Pharmacenter, Basel, Switzerland Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 589 Diploblasty in the historical perspective .......................................................................................................................................... 589 The cnidarian mesoderm unearthed ...................................................................................................................................................... 591 What is a mesoderm? ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 591 Muscle cells in Cnidaria ............................................................................................................................................................................... 592 Mesodermal muscle in Hydrozoa? ................................................................................................................................................. 592 Mesodermal differentiation in Scyphozoa, Cubozoa and Anthozoa ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Striated Muscle: Jellyfish and the Origin of Triploblasty
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Developmental Biology 282 (2005) 14 – 26 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Review Evolution of striated muscle: Jellyfish and the origin of triploblasty Katja Seipel, Volker Schmid* Institute of Zoology, Biocenter/Pharmacenter, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland Received for publication 6 October 2004, revised 9 March 2005, accepted 27 March 2005 Available online 26 April 2005 Abstract The larval and polyp stages of extant Cnidaria are bi-layered with an absence of mesoderm and its differentiation products. This anatomy originally prompted the diploblast classification of the cnidarian phylum. The medusa stage, or jellyfish, however, has a more complex anatomy characterized by a swimming bell with a well-developed striated muscle layer. Based on developmental histology of the hydrozoan medusa this muscle derives from the entocodon, a mesoderm-like third cell layer established at the onset of medusa formation. According to recent molecular studies cnidarian homologs to bilaterian mesoderm and myogenic regulators are expressed in the larval and polyp stages as well as in the entocodon and derived striated muscle. Moreover striated and smooth muscle cells may have evolved directly and independently from non-muscle cells as indicated by phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain genes (MHC class II). To accommodate all evidences we propose that striated muscle-based locomotion coevolved with the nervous and digestive systems in a basic metazoan Bauplan from which the ancestors of the Ctenophora (comb jellyfish), Cnidaria (jellyfish and polyps), as well as the Bilateria are derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Dance and Exile Research and Showcasing in Austria – an Attempt at a Chronology
    גרט ויזנטל רוקדת את יצירתה אנדנטה, וינה, 08/1906, גרטרוד קראוס רוקדת את יצירתה וודקה, וינה 1924, באדיבות מורה ציפרוביץ, וינה 1920, צילום: לא ידוע, באדיבות מוזיאון התיאטרון צילום: מוריץ נהר, באדיבות מוזיאון התיאטרון מוזיאון התיאטרון בוינה Mura Ziperowitsch, Wien, 1920, Photo: Unknown, Courtesy of Theatermuseum -KHM – Museumsverband Gertrud Kraus in Wodka, Wien 1924, Photo: Martind Grete Wiesenthal in Ändante con moto, Wien, Imboden, Courtesy of Theatermusem – KHM 08/1906, Photo: Moritz Naher, Courtesy of Theatermusuem, KHM-Museumsverband Dance and Exile Research and Showcasing in Austria – An Attempt at a Chronology Andrea Amort The broadly defined topic of exile, to a varying extent still relevant Nazi dictatorship. Presciently, Gertrud Kraus left Austria in 1935 to dance )modern dance and ballet( today, mainly covers those and emigrated to Palestine/Israel. Rudolf von Laban )Bratislava dance practitioners in Austria who, in the wake of Austro-Fascism 1879 – Weybridge, Surrey 1958(, the influential founder of Aus- and the racist and political measures of Nazi dictatorship, were druckstanz )expressionist dance(, is nowadays considered a na- restricted in their activities and went into inner emigration or else tional figure especially in Germany and England and, in recent were active in resistance, persecuted, expelled, or murdered. In years, also in Slovakia despite having been born in the Austro- dance scholarship also artists who had emigrated much earlier Hungarian Monarchy. He left Berlin in 1937 and escaped via Paris on and were committed to Zionism )among others, the Ornstein to England. sisters and Jan Veen, alias Hans Wiener ]sic[( are included in this topic. No precise statistics of the persecuted and murdered are avail- able; we estimate, however, that at least 200 dance practitioners All dance practitioners mentioned in the following – with the ex- were affected.
    [Show full text]
  • WIDERSTAND Gegen Den Nationalsozialismus in Berlin Widerstand Gegen Den Nationalsozialismus War Schwierig, Aber Möglich
    WIDERSTAND gegen den Nationalsozialismus in Berlin Widerstand gegen den Nationalsozialismus war schwierig, aber möglich. Er endete für die han- delnden Akteure oftmals mit Verhaftung, Folter, Verurteilung und Tod. Dennoch sind manche Menschen mutig diesen Weg gegangen. Herausgeber: Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt e. V. Die Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt ist ein gemeinnütziger Verein, der seit 1981 besteht. Im Zent- rum unserer Arbeit stehen Alltagsgeschichte und die Geschichte „von unten“, wobei wir die Erinnerungsarbeit nicht als Selbstzweck verstehen. Wir wollen anhand des Schicksals der NachbarInnen am Wohnort Zeitgeschichte und die eigene Verstrickung darin nachvollzieh- bar machen. Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt e. V. Tel: 030/215 44 50 [email protected] www.berliner-geschichtswerkstatt.de Widerstand gegen den Nationalsozialismus in Berlin Herausgeber: Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt e. V. Mit Beiträgen von: Geertje Andresen Madeleine Bernstorff Dörte Döhl Eckard Holler Thomas Irmer Jürgen Karwelat Ulrike Kersting Annette Maurer-Kartal Annette Neumann Cord Pagenstecher Kurt Schilde Bärbel Schindler-Saefkow Dokumentation zur Veranstaltungsreihe der Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt e. V. „Widerstand gegen den Nationalsozialismus in Berlin“ Januar bis Juni 2014 Eigenverlag der Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt e. V. Goltzstraße 49, 10781 Berlin, 2014 Druck: Rotabene Medienhaus, Schneider Druck GmbH, Rothenburg ob der Tauber Satz, Layout und Umschlaggestaltung: Irmgard Ariallah, Atelier Juch © für die Texte bei den Autorinnen und Autoren
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Zoology (BIO-225)
    Bergen Community College Division of Mathematics, Science and Technology Department of Biology and Horticulture Invertebrate Zoology (BIO-225) General Course Syllabus SPRING 2016 Course Title Invertebrate Zoology (BIO-225) Course Description: This course is a survey of the organisms without backbones, the invertebrates. Topics include the taxonomic concepts of cladistics versus the Linnaean phylogenetic study of these organisms. Concepts such as prostomates vs. deuterostomates, the development of the coelom, metamorphosis, etc. will be discussed. Laboratory sessions include external and internal examinations (dissections) of these organisms and descriptive and practical reinforcement of lecture materials. Prerequisites: BIO 101, BIO 203 General Education Course: No Course Credits; 4.0 Hours per week: 6.0 3 hours lecture and 3 hours lab Course Coordinator: Elena Tartaglia Required Lecture Pechenik, J.A. 2010. Biology of the Invertebrates. 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill Textbook: Publishers. ISBN 978-0-07-302826-2 Laboratory Manual: Hickman, C.P., Kats, L.B., Dolphin, W.D., Dean, H.L., and R.S. Schuhmacher: Customized Laboratory Manual for General Biology II, McGraw-Hill Companies, Dubuque, IA, 2006. Student Learning Objectives - Lecture The student will be able to: 1. Describe the environment in which invertebrates exist and some of their adaptations. Assessment will be based upon performance on exam questions. 2. Explain how evolution works and how it leads to greater biodiversity. Assessment will be based upon performance on exam questions. 1 3. Discuss how invertebrates are classified. Assessment will be based upon performance on exam questions. 4. Describe the protists, phylogentically, morphologically, and their lifestyles Assessment will be based upon performance on exam questions.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cnidaria Got Its Cnidocysts
    tems: ys Op l S e a n A ic c g c o l e s o i s Shostak, Biol syst Open Access 2015, 4:2 B Biological Systems: Open Access DOI: 10.4172/2329-6577.1000139 ISSN: 2329-6577 Review Article Open Access How Cnidaria Got Its Cnidocysts Stanley Shostak* Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA *Corresponding author: Stanley Shostak, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA, Tel: 0114129156595, E-mail: [email protected] Received date: May 06, 2015; Accepted date: Aug 03, 2015; Published date: Aug 11, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Shostak S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract A complex hypothesis is offered for the origins of cnidarian cnidocysts through symbiogeny. The two-part hypothetical pathway links the origins of tissues through an early amalgamation of amoebic and epithelial cells to and the later introduction of an extrusion apparatus from bacterial parasites. The first part of the hypothesis is based on evidence for morphological, molecular, and developmental similarities of cnidarians and myxozoans indicative of common ancestry. Support is drawn from Ediacaran fossils suggesting that stem-metazoans consisted of symbiogenic pairs of epithelial-like shells enclosing amoeba-like cells. The amoeba-like cells would have evolved into germ cells and cells differentiating as or inducing nerve, muscle, and gland cells. The second part of the hypothesis proposes that cnidocysts evolved in a cnidarian/myxozoan branch of the metazoan tree through the horizontal transfer of bacterial genes encoding an extrusion apparatus to proto-cnidarian amoebic cells and consequently to the Cnidarian germ line.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Biology of Sponges and Ctenophores
    Review The hidden biology of sponges and ctenophores 1 2 3 Casey W. Dunn , Sally P. Leys , and Steven H.D. Haddock 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman St, Providence, RI 02906, USA 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada 3 Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Rd, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA Animal evolution is often presented as a march toward unknown about their morphology, physiology, and molecu- complexity, with different living animal groups each lar biology (Box 1). We know less about their unique complex representing grades of organization that arose through traits than we do about the unique complex traits of many the progressive acquisition of complex traits. There are bilaterians, and our ignorance likely extends to complex now many reasons to reject this classical hypothesis. traits that have yet to be discovered (Box 1). Making matters Not only is it incompatible with recent phylogenetic worse, what is known about ctenophores and sponges is analyses, but it is also an artifact of ‘hidden biology’, filtered through the lens of bilaterian biology (Box 1) and that is, blind spots to complex traits in non-model spe- often misrepresented (Boxes 2 and 3). This leaves consider- cies. A new hypothesis of animal evolution, where many able gaps in our understanding of traits that are key to complex traits have been repeatedly gained and lost, is reconstructing early animal evolution, and the historical emerging. As we discuss here, key details of this new focus on studying complex traits found in Bilateria is often model hinge on a better understanding of the Porifera misinterpreted as evidence that there are few unique com- and Ctenophora, which have each been hypothesized to plex traits found in other animals (Box 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating and Re-Creating Dance Performing Dances Related to Ausdruckstanz
    Creating and Re-Creating Dance Performing Dances Related to Ausdruckstanz Betsy Fisher ACTA SCENICA 12 Creating and Re-Creating Dance Performing dances related to Ausdruckstanz Betsy Fisher ACTA SCENICA 12 Näyttämötaide ja tutkimus Teatterikorkeakoulu - Scenkonst och forskning - Teaterhögskolan - Scenic art and research - Theatre Academy Betsy Fisher Creating and Re-Creating Dance Performing dances related to Ausdruckstanz written thesis for the artistic doctorate in dance Theatre Academy, Department of Dance and Theatre Pedagogy Publisher: Theatre Academy © Theatre Academy and Betsy Fisher Front and back cover photos: Carl Hefner Cover and lay-out: Tanja Nisula ISBN: 952-9765-31-2 ISSN: 1238-5913 Printed in Yliopistopaino, Helsinki 2002 To Hanya Holm who said, “Can do.” And to Ernest Provencher who said, “I do.” Contents Abstract 7 Acknowledgements 9 Preface 11 Introduction 13 Preparation: Methodology 19 Rehearsal: Directors 26 Discoveries: Topics in Reconstruction 43 Performance: The Call is “Places”– an analysis from inside 75 Creating from Re-Creating: Thicket of Absent Others 116 Connections and Reflections 138 Notes 143 References 150 Index 157 Abstract Performance Thesis All aspects of my research relate to my work in dance reconstruction, performance, and documentation. Concerts entitled eMotion.s: German Lineage in Contemporary Dance and Thicket of Absent Others constitute the degree performance requirements for an artistic doctorate in dance and were presented in Studio-Theater Four at The Theater Academy of Finland. eMotion.s includes my performance of solos choreographed by Mary Wigman, Dore Hoyer, Marianne Vogelsang, Hanna Berger, Rosalia Chladek, Lotte Goslar, Hanya Holm, Alwin Nikolais, Murray Louis, and Beverly Blossom. These choreographers share a common artistic link to Ausdruckstanz (literally Expression Dance).
    [Show full text]
  • Hanna Berger-Bio-Köln2012
    Hanna Berger (Wien 1910 – Ost-Berlin 1962) Hanna Berger war eine Vertreterin der großen Bewegung des modernen freien Tanzes, die sich vor allem in Mitteleuropa bis zum Ausbruch des nationalsozialistischen Regimes vielfältig entwickelte und die Grundlagen für eine künstlerische Transformation nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg legte. Aus österreichischer Sicht zählt die in Wien geborene Tänzerin, Choreografin, Regisseurin, Pädagogin, Autorin sowie Leiterin des Wiener Kindertheaters und Leiterin der Wiener Kammertanzgruppe zu den Tanz-Größen Grete Wiesenthal und Rosalia Chladek. Denkt man auch die durch den Nationalsozialismus verfemten freien Tanz-Künstlerinnen aus Österreich mit, zu denen Berger nicht zuletzt auf Grund ihrer politisch widerständischen Einstellung gehörte, ist sie in einem größeren ChoreografInnen-Kreis zu sehen. Dem gehören unter Anderen Gertrud Bodenwieser, Hilde Holger, Gertrud Kraus, Cilli Wang, Andrei Jerschik aber auch der nicht mit Hanna Berger verwandte Fritz Berger (Fred Berk), mit dem sie in Kontakt war, an. Berger selbst nannte, abgesehen von Wiesenthal, Valeria Kratina, Gertrud Kraus und Ellinor Tordis als maßgebliche in Österreich wirkende Persönlichkeiten. Berger war nicht zuletzt auf Grund ihres frühen Todes, sie starb im Alter von 51 Jahren an einem Gehirntumor in Ost-Berlin, in Vergessenheit geraten. Als jüngste der eingangs erwähnten Frauen reicht sie mit ihrem Werk bereits in eine neue Phase des Ausdruckstanzes hinein. Die großen künstlerischen Dogmen waren, nicht zuletzt durch die Zäsur des Zweiten Weltkriegs, aufgeweicht und neue Freiheit und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten standen zur Verfügung. Künstlerische Spartentrennung interessierte Berger nicht; sie wandte jeweils jene Mittel und Methoden an, die ihr richtig erschienen. Leben Hanna (eigentlich Johanna Elisabeth) Berger wurde am 23. August 1910 als uneheliches Kind von Maria Hochleitner und dem „wohlhabenden Bürger“ Eduard Wolfram in Wien geboren und römisch-katholisch getauft.
    [Show full text]
  • Porifera (Sponges) Choanoflagellates Ctenophora (Comb Jellies) Cnidaria (Jellyfish, Corals, Sea Anemones) Acoela (Acoels) Rotife
    Choanoflagellates Fungi ANIMALIA Choanoflagellates Porifera (sponges) ANIMALIA Multicellularity Ctenophora (comb jellies) Cnidaria (jellyfish, corals, sea anemones) Diploblasty Acoela (acoels) LOPHOTROCHOZOA Rotifera (rotifers) Loss of coelom Platyhelminthes Triploblasty (flatworms) Segmentation Annelida (segmented worms) PROTOSTOMES Protostome Mollusca BILATERIA development (snails, clams, squid) ECDYSOZOA Nematoda (roundworms) Cephalization, CNS, coelom Arthropoda Segmentation (insects, spiders, crustaceans) DEUTEROSTOMES DEUTEROSTOMES Radial symmetry Echinodermata (in adults) (sea stars, sand dollars) Deuterostome development Chordata Segmentation (vertebrates, tunicates) General Annelid Characteristics • Coelomate, Triploblastic • Protostome (lophotrochozoan) • Cephalization • Bodies are segmented, worm shaped • Setae (chaetae) • Closed circulatory system • Metanephridia • Complete digestive system • Marine, freshwater, terrestrial Phylum Annelida • Class Polychaeta (nearly all marine) • Class Clitellata – Subclass Oligochaeta (mostly terrestrial or freshwater) – Subclass Hirudinea (mostly freshwater, terrestrial) (Did clitellates also evolve from polychaete ancestors?) One Hypothesis… Is this is true, the Class Polychaeta is not monophyletic Phylum Annelida Class Clitellata Class Polychaeta Subclass Hirudinea 1 2 3 Class Clitellata Subclass Oligochaeta Earthworm Clitellum Metamerism: serial repetition of segments Septa (peritoneum) divide the coelom into compartments Septa Hydrostatic skeleton is partitioned Circular and Longitudinal
    [Show full text]