UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Shadow on the steps : time measurement in ancient Israel Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8q86391z Author Miano, David Ringo Publication Date 2006 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SHADOW ON THE STEPS: Time Measurement in Ancient Israel A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by David Ringo Miano Committee in charge: Professor David Noel Freedman, Co-chair Professor William H.C. Propp, Co-chair Professor Richard Elliott Friedman Professor David Goodblatt Professor Thomas E. Levy Professor Alden A. Mosshammer 2006 © David Ringo Miano, 2006 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of David Ringo Miano is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2006 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………………. iv List of Figures and Tables………………………………………………………vii Vita, Publications, and Fields of Study………………………………………… ix Abstract………………………………………………………………………… x Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 I. Calendars………………………………………………………………..7 A. Natural Units of Time……………………………………………... 7 B. The Day as a Unit of Measurement……………………………….. 8 1. The Hebrew Word for Day…………………………………... 8 2. When Does the Day Begin and End?........................................ 8 3. Measurable Divisions of the Day…………………………….. 15 C. The Month as a Unit of Measurement…………………………….. 22 1. The Hebrew Words for Month……………………………….. 22 2. The Naming and Numbering of Months……………………... 23 3. When Does the Month Begin and End? ……………………... 28 4. Measurable Divisions of the Month …………………………. 32 D. The Year as a Unit of Measurement………………………………. 34 1. The Hebrew Word for Year………………………………….. 34 2. When Does the Year Begin and End?....................................... 36 a. The Agricultural Year……………………………………36 b. The Civil Year…………………………………………... 40 c. The Liturgical Year……………………………………... 45 d. The Regnal Year………………………………………… 46 E. Lunar, Solar, and Lunisolar Calendars……………………………. 52 II. Long-Time Reckoning…………………………………………………. 55 A. The Counting of Time Units……………………………………… 55 iv B. The Egyptian Epoch and the Exodus Era…………………………. 62 C. Counting Generations……………………………………………... 65 III. Genealogical Chronologies…………………………………………….. 72 A. Dating Events by the Life of an Individual……………………….. 72 B. Genealogical Lists Containing Chronological Information………. 74 1. Description…………………………………………………… 74 2. List-Making in the Ancient World…………………………… 75 3. Textual Variants of Genesis 5 and 11 and Their History…….. 78 a. Genesis 5………………………………………………... 78 b. Genesis 11………………………………………………. 88 C. Sources of the Priestly Genealogical Chronology………………… 94 1. Preliminary Considerations…………………………………... 94 2. Pedigrees……………………………………………………... 99 a. Ancient Linear Genealogies in General………………… 99 b. The Life Spans of the Forefathers………………………. 101 c. A Generational Pedigree in Genesis 5 and 11…………... 105 3. Conclusions…………………………………………………... 110 IV. Hegemonic Chronologies……………………………………………….113 A. Chronological Sources of the Deuteronomistic History……………113 1. Time as Seen by the Deuteronomistic Historians and Their Audiences……………………………………………………. 113 2. Chronological Sources for the Book of Jeremiah……………. 114 3. Chronological Sources Relating to the Judges……………….. 118 4. Chronological Sources Relating to the Kings………………... 125 a. Preliminary Considerations……………………………... 125 b. King Lists……………………………………………….. 129 c. Royal Chronicles………………………………………... 145 d. Textual Difficulties in Kings……………………………. 155 e. Conclusions……………………………………………... 173 B. Historical Reconstructions………………………………………... 174 V. Conclusions…………………………………………………………….. 209 v Appendix A: Chronological Tables……………………………………………. 217 Appendix B: What Happened in the Fourteenth Year of Hezekiah?................... 223 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………… 251 vi LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1.1: The Cairo Shadow Clock……………………………………………… 18 Figure 1.2: A Drawing of the Cairo Shadow Clock………………………………... 19 Figure 1.3: Reconstruction of Ahaz’s Roof Chamber……………………………... 19 Figure 1.4: The Shadow Created on the Steps According to the Sun’s Position…... 21 Table 1.1: Priestly Dates that Include Months……………………………………... 25 Table 1.2: Agricultural Activity in Modern Israel…………………………………. 36 Table 2.1: The Count of Days ……………………………………………………... 57 Table 2.2: Time Covered by Solomon’s Building Activities……………………… 60 Table 3.1: Variant Readings of the Numbers in Genesis 5………………………… 78 Table 3.2: Variant Readings of the Numbers in Genesis 11……………………….. 89 Table 3.3: Sources of the Ages in the Priestly Genealogy…………………………. 111 Table 4.1: Readings for Abijam, Asa and Jeroboam………………………………. 159 Table 4.2: Readings for Baasha and Elah………………………………………….. 160 Table 4.3: Totalling the Years of Omri…………………………………………….. 160 Table 4.4: Counts for Omri Assumed in the Manuscripts…………………………. 163 Table 4.5: Readings for Zimri, Tibni, Omri and Ahab…………………………….. 164 Table 4.6: Readings for Ahab, Jehoshaphat and Ahaziah…………………………. 165 Table 4.7: Readings for Ahaziah, Joram and Jehoram…………………………….. 166 Table 4.8: Readings for Jehoram and Ahaziah…………………………………….. 167 Table 4.9: Readings for Amaziah and Azariah…………………………………….. 169 Table 4.10: Readings for Jotham, Ahaz and Hoshea………………………………. 172 Table 4.11: Comparison of Extrabiblical Dates with Judahite King List Dates…… 183 vii Table 4.12: Comparison of Extrabiblical Dates with Israelite King List Dates…… 186 Table 4.14: Comparison of Extrabiblical Dates with Chronicle Dates for the Kings of Judah………………………………………………… 207 Table 4.15: Comparison of Extrabiblical Dates with Chronicle Dates for the Kings of Israel………………………………………………… 208 Table A.1: Chronology of Dtr2…………………………………………………….. 218 Table A.2: Chronology of Dtr1…………………………………………………….. 219 Table B.1: Name Patterns in 2 Kings 18-19……………………………………….. 246 Figure B.1: The Reordering of 2 Kings 18-20……………………………………... 249 viii VITA 1994 A.S. in Communications, Niagara County Community College 1999 B.A. in Classics, State University of New York at Buffalo 1999-2006 Section Instructor, Revelle Humanities Program, UCSD 2003 M.A. in History, University of California, San Diego 2005-2006 Adjunct Instructor, University of San Diego 2005-2006 Adjunct Instructor, San Diego Mesa College 2006 Ph.D. in History, University of California, San Diego PUBLICATIONS “Is the Shorter Reading Better? Haplography in the First Book of Chronicles” ([co-authored with David Noel Freedman] in Emanuel: Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov, S. M. Paul, R. A. Kraft, L. H. Schiffman, and W. W. Fields, eds.; Leiden: Brill, 2003) "People of the New Covenant" ([co-authored with David Noel Freedman] in The Concept of Covenant in Second Temple Judaism. S. Porter and J. deRoo, eds.; Leiden: Brill, 2003) "Slip of the Eye: Accidental Omission in the Masoretic Tradition" ([co-authored with David Noel Freedman] in The Challenge of Bible Translation: Essays in Honor of Ronald F. Youngblood. G. Scorgie et al, eds.; Zondervan, 2003) “The Deuteronomic History: A Brief Introduction” (www.myjewishlearning.com, 2003) “The Twelve Sepharim of the Torah” (The Biblical Historian 1/1 [2004] 21-42) FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History (Ancient Israel and the Hebrew Bible) Minor Field: Ancient Near Eastern History Minor Field: Early Christian History ix ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Shadow on the Steps: Time Measurement in Ancient Israel by David Ringo Miano Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, San Diego 2006 Professor David Noel Freedman, Co-Chair Professor William H.C. Propp, Co-Chair Many historians and biblical scholars have attempted to make sense of the data found in the Hebrew Bible in order to reconstruct the time measuring systems that were in use in ancient Israel. Some have been more successful than others, but all who have tackled the problem have had difficulties in understanding the systems employed. The usual approach is to ignore the fact that the Bible is a collection of various writings from various times and places and to gather all of the chronological data from the entire collection and treat them homogeneously, hoping to find consistency among them. However, we can never comprehend the biblical data unless we treat each of the biblical sources as an independent unit. Once that is done, the picture becomes clearer. We find that the ancient Israelites had more than one calendar, more than one method of measuring intervals of time between events, and several different chronologies of its history. x INTRODUCTION 525,600 minutes, 525,000 moments so dear. 525,600 minutes - how do you measure, measure a year? In daylights, in sunsets, in midnights, in cups of coffee. In inches, in miles, in laughter, in strife. In 525,600 minutes - how do you measure a year in the life? How about love? How about love? How about love? Measure in love. Seasons of love. 525,600 minutes! 525,000 journeys to plan. 525,600 minutes - how can you measure the life of a woman or man? In truths that she learned, or in times that he cried. In bridges he burned, or the way that she died. It’s time now to sing out, the story never ends. Let's celebrate, remember a year in the life of friends. Remember the love! Remember the love! Remember the love! Measure
Recommended publications
  • 1. the Chronological Structure of the Modern "History Textbook"
    Part III. THE CHRONOLOGY AND GENERAL CONCEPTION OF ROMAN AND BYZANTINE HISTORY Fig. 15.2. Scaligerian dating of the events described by the fa- mous mediaeval English chroniclers – Galfridus Monemuten- sis and Nennius. See [577] and [155]. chapter 19 The problem of reconstructing the veracious version of Roman history The amended chronology of Rome and Byzantium nologists of the XVI-XVII century, J. Scaliger and was presented in the works of A. T. Fomenko (see D. Petavius. Most professional historians of our epoch Chron1 and Chron2). It is based on extensive com- do not dispute this version, although its veracity was puter calculations made in the course of analysing put to doubt by a number of scientists. the entire volume of historical and chronological data 2) The historical and chronological version of Sca- available today from the natural scientific point of liger and Petavius contains a number of phantom view. The new chronology of Rome and Byzantium duplicates, or repeated rendition of the same histor- implies that the consensual Scaligerian version of Ro- ical events that are presented as different ones and man and Byzantine chronology is blatantly erroneous. dated to different historical epochs, which are often We call for a revision of the surviving historical separated by centuries and even millennia. sources, which attain a totally new meaning when 3) All the events dated to the epochs that precede analysed from the position of the New Chronology. 1000 a.d. in the version of Scaliger and Petavius are Since Roman history is closely related to the his- phantoms that reflect more recent events in reality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alleged Mention of Chedorlaomer on a Babylonian Tablet
    Palestine Exploration Quarterly ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20 The Alleged Mention of Chedorlaomer on a Babylonian Tablet Colonel C. R. Conder To cite this article: Colonel C. R. Conder (1904) The Alleged Mention of Chedorlaomer on a Babylonian Tablet, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 36:1, 80-83, DOI: 10.1179/peq.1904.36.1.80 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/peq.1904.36.1.80 Published online: 20 Nov 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20 Download by: [Universite Laval] Date: 13 May 2016, At: 02:15 "80 CHEDOI{LAO)IER ox A BABYLO~rA~ TABLET. Possihly, even a "royal city" or "sta.tion" stood there, with magazines for receiving the yearly tribute of grain from the surrounding region. Excavations would certainly fnrnish some traces of the Egyptian soldiers and officials.l The "stone of Joh" is, evidently, too far remote from the settlement just described to be connected with it. ,As has hecn said above, its Egyptian representation indicates only the rcligions importance of the locality, nothing clse. 'THE ALLEGED ~IENTION OF CHEDORLA.O~IEI{ OX A BABYLONIAN TABLET. By Colonel C. H. CONDER,H.E., D.C.L., LL.D. IF it could be proved that the King of Elam whose llame i:;;written by the signs CU-clt-au-aU-J1A wa~ the Chedorlaomer of (;enesis (xiv, 1), his history would be important to Palestine research, since the latter invaded Canaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer 'Dating the Death of Jesus' Citation for published version: Bond, H 2013, ''Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination', New Testament Studies, vol. 59, no. 04, pp. 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688513000131 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0028688513000131 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: New Testament Studies Publisher Rights Statement: © Helen Bond, 2013. Bond, H. (2013). 'Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination. New Testament Studies, 59(04), 461-475doi: 10.1017/S0028688513000131 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Dating the Death of Jesus: Memory and the Religious Imagination Helen K. Bond School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, Mound Place, Edinburgh, EH1 2LX [email protected] After discussing the scholarly preference for dating Jesus’ crucifixion to 7th April 30 CE, this article argues that the precise date can no longer be recovered. All we can claim with any degree of historical certainty is that Jesus died some time around Passover (perhaps a week or so before the feast) between 29 and 34 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • North Park C H U R C H
    Notes: North Park C H U R C H WORSHIP CONNECT IMPACT Sunday, November 15, 2015 ABRAHAM : Braveheart Genesis 14 I. Abram Against P________________________ II. Abram Against F__________________________ III. Why He Fought: For L____________ and L_______________ IV. How He Fought: With F___________ and S_______________ V. Dividing the Glory Scripture References: Genesis 14:17-24 Then after his return from the defeat of (New American Standard Bible (NASB) is used unless otherwise indicated.) Chedorlaomer and the kings who were with him, the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the valley of Shaveh (that is, the King’s Genesis 14:1-12 And it came about in the days of Amraphel king of Valley). 18And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal now he was a priest of God Most High. 19He blessed him and said, king of Goiim, 2that they made war with Bera king of Sodom, and “Blessed be Abram of God Most High, with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber Possessor of heaven and earth; king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar). 3All these came 20And blessed be God Most High, as allies to the valley of Siddim (that is, the Salt Sea). 4Twelve years Who has delivered your enemies into your hand.” they had served Chedorlaomer, but the thirteenth year they rebelled. He gave him a tenth of all. 21The king of Sodom said to Abram, “Give 5In the fourteenth year Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with the people to me and take the goods for yourself.” 22Abram said to the him, came and defeated the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim and the king of Sodom, “I have sworn to the Lord God Most High, possessor of Zuzim in Ham and the Emim in Shaveh-kiriathaim, 6and the Horites in heaven and earth, 23that I will not take a thread or a sandal thong or their Mount Seir, as far as El-paran, which is by the wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian History: a Brief Chronology (998-2000)
    Russian History: A Brief Chronology (998-2000) 1721 Sweden cedes the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea to Russia (Treaty of Nystad). In celebration, Peter’s title Kievan Russia is changed from tsar to Emperor of All Russia Abolition of the Patrarchate of Moscow. Religious authority passes to the Holy Synod and its Ober- prokuror, appointed by the tsar. 988 Conversion to Christianity 1722 Table of Ranks 1237-1240 Mongol Invasion 1723-25 The Persian Campaign. Persia cedes western and southern shores of the Caspian to Russia Muscovite Russia 1724 Russia’s Academy of Sciences is established 1725 Peter I dies on February 8 1380 The Battle of Kulikovo 1725-1727 Catherine I 1480 End of Mongol Rule 1727-1730 Peter II 1462-1505 Ivan III 1730-1740 Anne 1505-1533 Basil III 1740-1741 Ivan VI 1533-1584 Ivan the Terrible 1741-1762 Elizabeth 1584-98 Theodore 1744 Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst arrives in Russia and assumes the name of Grand Duchess 1598-1613 The Time of Troubles Catherine Alekseevna after her marriage to Grand Duke Peter (future Peter III) 1613-45 Michael Romanoff 1762 Peter III 1645-76 Alexis 1762 Following a successful coup d’etat in St. Petersburg 1672-82 Theodore during which Peter III is assassinated, Catherine is proclaimed Emress of All Russia Imperial Russia 1762-1796 Catherine the Great 1767 Nakaz (The Instruction) 1772-1795 Partitions of Poland 1682-1725 Peter I 1773-1774 Pugachev Rebellion 1689 The Streltsy Revolt and Suppression; End of Sophia’s Regency 1785 Charter to the Nobility 1695-96 The Azov Campaigns 1791 Establishment fo the Pale of Settlement (residential restrictions on Jews) in the parts of Poland with large 1697-98 Peter’s travels abroad (The Grand Embassy) Jewish populations, annexed to Russia in the partitions of Poland (1772, 1793, and 1795) and in the 1698 The revolt and the final suppression of the Streltsy Black Sea liitoral annexed from Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3 BECOMING a FRIEND of the FAITHFUL GOD a STUDY on ABRAHAM
    Part 3 Becoming a Friend of the Faithful God A STUDY on Abraham i In & Out® GENESIS Part 3 BECOMING A FRIEND OF THE FAITHFUL GOD A STUDY ON ABRAHAM ISBN 978-1-62119-760-7 © 2015, 2018 Precept Ministries International. All rights reserved. This material is published by and is the sole property of Precept Ministries International of Chattanooga, Tennessee. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Precept, Precept Ministries International, Precept Ministries International The Inductive Bible Study People, the Plumb Bob design, Precept Upon Precept, In & Out, Sweeter than Chocolate!, Cookies on the Lower Shelf, Precepts For Life, Precepts From God’s Word and Transform Student Ministries are trademarks of Precept Ministries International. Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, ©1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by the Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. www.lockman.org 2nd edition Printed in the United States of America ii CONTENTS PAGE CONTENTS L ESSONS 1 LESSON ONE: An Extraordinary Promise 9 LESSON TWO: Covenant with God 17 LESSON THREE: “Is anything too difficult for the LORD?” 21 LESSON FOUR: What Does God Say about Homosexuality? 27 LESSON FIVE: Is There a Bondwoman in Your Life? 35 LESSON SIX: The Promised Son A PPENDIX 40 Explanations of the New American Standard Bible Text Format 41 Observation Worksheets 77 Abraham’s Family Tree 79 Journal on God 83 From Ur to Canaan 84 Abraham’s Sojournings 85 Genesis 1–25 at a Glance iii iv Precept Ministries International Becoming a Friend P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • VAYISHLACH (And He Sent)
    VAYISHLACH (And He Sent) GENESIS (B‟RESHIYT 32:3 – 36:43) INTRODUCTION: 1. Jacob‟s flight from Esau now comes full circle. a. He had left to flee Esau‟s anger and vengeful plan to kill him. b. As Jacob approached Canaan, Esau approached him with a 400 man army. c. However, Isaac was still alive at this time. “And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him: and Esau said in his heart, „The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob.” – Genesis 27:41 2. It seems inevitable that Jacob was going to have to confront Esau in order to enter land. a. Prophetically: Israel under Moses/Joshua had to confront Esau as well as giants. b. To possess the Land (fulfill purpose) requires confronting the obstacles. 3. Also see how and when Jacob became Israel. a. From “hand on heel” to “prince of God.” 4. Some rabbinic writers consider this even to have been a prophetic vision. a. Many see it as symbolic – each person has to struggle with God to become whole. b. In face of crisis, Jacob was left alone with God. 5. Yet, in the haftarah it says: “In the womb he took his brother by the heel [literally occurred], and in his manhood he strove with God. He strove with the angel and prevailed; he wept and sought his favor. He met God at Bethel [literally occurred], and there God spoke with us.” – Hosea 12:3-4 6. Jacob had struggled with men and overcome through persistency, morality and wit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Ordinary People with an Extraordinary Story A
    TEN ORDINARY PEOPLE WITH AN EXTRAORDINARY STORY When you read Genesis 18, you’re actually picking up the story of how God is continually orchestrating His plan to make Israel a great nation. It’s the story of how one nation, born of an ordinary man and an ordinary woman with more than their share of problems changed the history of the world—for eternity. So if that sounds like you and you wonder how you could be of any significant value to the Kingdom of God—then listen up this morning, because this story is for you. Read Genesis 14; 18-19 Lot was Abraham’s nephew. In Genesis 14, Lot is given a chance to choose which part of the Promised Land he wants for his own. He selects an area known as Sodom – which bears the namesake for the word sodomy—which seems like a questionable decision about where to relocate your family—but like I said, the Bible isn’t afraid to take us places where ordinary people make messy decisions. This whole enterprise is based on a promise from God to Abraham, that he would have a son; and his children’s children would eventually grow into a vast nation of God-fearing people. But that takes a few hundred years, so in the meanwhile, Lot and Abraham are doing OK. Lot raises a family in the land of the Sodomites and gets himself elected as a judge. Then he finds himself in the middle of a war between two tribal groups and Uncle Abraham has to gather his 318 Navy Seals of the day to rescue Lot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wives of Solomon
    THE WIVES OF SOLOMON. BY MONCURE D. CONWAY. " CCORDING to the first book of Kings, Solomon's half-brother, ft Adonijah, after the defeat of an alleged (perhaps mythical) effort to recover the throne of which he had been defrauded, sub­ mitted himself to Solomon. He had become enamored of the vir­ gin who had been brought to the aged King David to try to revive some vitality in him; and he came to Bathsheba asking her to re­ quest her son the king to give him this damsel as his wife. Bath­ sheba proffered this "small petition" for Adonijah, but Solomon was enraged, and ironically suggested that she should ask the king­ dom itself for Adonijah, whom he straightway ordered to execu­ tion. The immediate context indicates that Solomon suspected in this petition a plot against his throne. A royal father's harem was inherited by a royal son, and its possession is supposed to have in­ volved certain rights of succession: this is the only interpretation I have ever heard of the extreme violence of Solomon. But I have never been satisfied with this explanation. Would Adonijah have requested, or Bathsheba asked as a "small" thing, a favor touch­ ing the king's tenure? The story as told in the Book of Kings appears diplomatic, and several details suggest that in some earlier legend the strife between the half- brothers had a more romantic relation to "Abishag the Shunammite," who is described as "very fair." Abishag is interpreted as meaning "father of error," and though that translation is of doubtful accuracy, its persistence in­ dicates the place occupied by her in early tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Characters Mentioned Outside the Bible (See History.)
    Last updated: 12-Dec-2018 at 18:15 Bible chronology main page Bible Characters Mentioned Outside the Bible (See History.) © Richard P. Español in Contemporary Sources Aschmann Rick Aschmann Contents 1. Lists of Identified Individuals 2. Why are none found earlier than the kings? 2.1. The Pharaohs 2.1.1. Couldn’t we identify unnamed pharaohs based on the Egyptian king lists? 2.1.2. Can we identify the later named pharaohs? 2.2. The Four Kings of the East 2.3. Other Theories 1. Lists of Identified Individuals Many individuals mentioned in the Bible are also mentioned outside the Bible in contemporary (or fairly contemporary) archaeological sources. The following two links give a fairly complete list of these. List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources 50 people in the bible confirmed archaeologically The interesting thing is that both of these sites evidently have the perspective that the Bible is not the inerrant, inspired Word of God, whereas I believe it is.1 So it might seem like such lists are not useful for the Bible-believer. On the contrary, they are quite useful: these are names that everyone can agree have been confirmed from extra-biblical sources, so they serve to confirm the reliability of the Bible in spite of having been compiled by unbelievers! If you look at the chart near the top of the first site, you can sort it from earliest to latest by clicking twice in the title of the Date (BCE) column. This chart shows that the earliest attested name (according to the compiler of this list) is Omri the father of Ahab, whose reign (and dynasty) started in 880 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Trouble: Counting the Cost of Jephthah
    Double Trouble: Counting the Cost of Jephthah I. 40 x 2 In a paper published in 1980, J. Alberto Soggin lamented: “Despite forty years of research by leading exegetes, the problem of what the minor judges represent remains unsolved.”1 Today, nigh on forty years later, the reality is substantially the same. In those eight decades, consideration of the question has been shaped largely by the perspectives of Albrecht Alt and his student, Martin Noth. Alt found in the minor judges an authenticity of historical record which he considered to be lacking in the accounts of the major judges. The chief basis for his conclusion was that their respective periods of office are given not in rounded figures, as in the case of the major judges, but in numbers that possess a “completely unartificial appearance.”2 Noth developed Alt’s arguments to claim that the key to understanding the role of the minor judges in Settlement-era Israel and their relationship with the major judges is furnished in the portrayal of Jephthah who combines features of both. Alone among the charismatic military leaders, he was also a minor judge.3 Given the influence which Noth’s conclusions have exercised on successive generations of scholars,4 it is worth quoting his supporting arguments: 1 “Das Amt der ‘kleinen Richter’ in Israel,” VT 30 (1980): 245-8 (246). 2 Essays on Old Testament History and Religion (trans. R.A. Wilson; Oxford: Blackwell, 1966), 102. 3 The History of Israel (2nd edn; London: SCM Press, 1960), 101-2. 4 E. Theodore Mullen, Jr., “‘The ‘Minor Judges’: Some Literary and Historical Considerations,” CBQ 44 (1982): 185-201 (186).
    [Show full text]
  • Vayetze HODF 2/8/17 by Beth Mehaffey Vayetze – and He Went
    VaYetze – And He Went Out Genesis 28:10-32:3 (2) This parashah is part of a chiastic structure that runs from Genesis 28:5-37:1; it covers Jacob’s entire exile from the time he leaves his parents in Canaan for Paddan Aram, and returns to the land of Canaan. The central axis is when YHVH enables Jacob to leave Laban and head for Canaan [Genesis 31:1-55 (31:1- 32:1)]. This is approximately the midpoint of our parashah. Instead of comparing and contrasting both halves of this chiasm, we’ll compare with other texts. VaYetze – And He Went Out Jacob Joseph Yeshua Comments Exile, salvation, and marriage Jacob left for Paddan Joseph was sent off by For God did not send Esau’s marriage to Aram; he was sent off his father to check on His Son into the world Mahalath was likely an by his father to find a his brothers. Through a to condemn the world, attempt to appease his wife among his wife’s series of events he but that the world parents for previously people. ended up in Egypt. through Him might be marrying outside the saved (John 3:17). extended family. His mother wanted to Years later, Pharaoh send him away to save gave Joseph Asenath, But He answered and Joseph married outside him from death at the the daughter of Poti- said, "I was not sent the family. At this stage hand of his brother Perah priest of On as a except to the lost in his life, it would not Esau.
    [Show full text]