Palestine Exploration Quarterly

ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20

The Alleged Mention of Chedorlaomer on a Babylonian Tablet

Colonel C. R. Conder

To cite this article: Colonel C. R. Conder (1904) The Alleged Mention of Chedorlaomer on a Babylonian Tablet, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 36:1, 80-83, DOI: 10.1179/peq.1904.36.1.80

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/peq.1904.36.1.80

Published online: 20 Nov 2013.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 3

View related articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20

Download by: [Universite Laval] Date: 13 May 2016, At: 02:15 "80 CHEDOI{LAO)IER ox A BABYLO~rA~ TABLET.

Possihly, even a "royal city" or "sta.tion" stood there, with magazines for receiving the yearly tribute of grain from the surrounding region. Excavations would certainly fnrnish some traces of the Egyptian soldiers and officials.l The "stone of Joh" is, evidently, too far remote from the settlement just described to be connected with it. ,As has hecn said above, its Egyptian representation indicates only the rcligions importance of the locality, nothing clse.

'THE ALLEGED ~IENTION OF CHEDORLA.O~IEI{ OX A BABYLONIAN TABLET. By Colonel C. H. CONDER,H.E., D.C.L., LL.D. IF it could be proved that the King of whose llame i:;;written by the signs CU-clt-au-aU-J1A wa~ the Chedorlaomer of (;enesis (xiv, 1), his history would be important to Palestine research, since the latter invaded . I have already called attention «(2ual'teri;1} State'Jnent, July, 1898) to the texts, translated by Dr. 1.'. G. Pinches, in which this

name occurs, one being a poem describing the desecration (If a teluple ill Ba.bylon, and the punishment of the Elamite offender. These documents are, however, written in the Babylonian cuneiform script of the sixth or seventh century B C., and the connection with history of the twenty-sec(Jlld century H.C. has been denied by many scholars. FUl'thel' ~tudy of the texts appears to indicate who this Elamite king' really wa:o;,and to show that the events recorded occurred in 648 D.C. The tablet:-; an' difficult to understand, because much mutilated; and in some passages great uncer- ta.inty exist8, because the cuneifol'nl emblems had more than one sound in common use. The following readings, however, throw l'on:o;iuerahle light on the subject :- SP. II, 987.- "the government I (founded ?) (to) the ends of heaven to the four quarters. .. He establi8hed theln: the government which Babylon the glorious city ... he established for them,

Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 02:15 13 May 2016 the property possessed by those of Babylon, great and small. .. By their advice they supported au cu cu au J/A, king of the land of Elam. They decided to overthrow all that ..... good things on them. In Babylon, the city of Babylonia, they made a government. . .. III Babylon, the city of Merodach, King of Gods, they overthrew they made an end of it. Priests (/[alabi)of a robber house favoured they -burned constantly. Strangers (A1ib~) brought by him from afar they loved .... he changed .... the strangers made a disturbance ( Uslclw)

1 ::\Iight not the name (" mound of the warrior," f'.f. Professor G~ .:t. Smith, p. 346) point to an old sculpture representing a wtU"rior ? CHEDORLAOMER ON A BABYLONIAN TABLET. 81

coming to the region of the west (tabbi II{ j[ARTlI) ... The priest (Kala.bu) broke the commandment (J.VEIl J) ADlJA 1) he favoured a God .... he nlade a change. They sped from afar (Sir Kltu8Szt), the robbers, entering the region of the west ... the abode of the King of Elam, who caused the temple of Bel to be spoiled (issulul) .... the sons of Babyloll restore it) their work which ye set in order. Thus I the KinA', SOil of the King . . . .. son of the daughter of the King who sat on the throne of the Kingdom ..... Dm·rltbilani, son of Al·ad MaU:1t, to announce. . . . . sat on the throne of the Kingdom in former time, as .... no King may come, whom fr0111of old they supported .... pro- claimed Master of Babylon, unle8s they decided in the nlOnth Cislen (November), and the month Tamnluz (June) to make the beginning of the (flooding 1) of all the lands by their advice to support the chief beginning of the flood by the announce- ment that he caused the King, the ruler, not ...•.. himself .•.... the God Shamash ...... • the officials that day, a~ many as the sinful lords . . . . . he wished, whoever ..•.. tht" good of Babylon, of the temple of Bel" ..... This letter or proclamation is signed by a scribe whose name is lost. It appears to refer to reconsecration of the temple desecrat~d by the rebels and foreigners. SP. III, 2.-...... "his deed, not ...... went out in ha~te before the Gods was the day Sarnas-surn-nammi'J· .... the Lord of Lords Merodach in strength of heart a slave. All his lands I took, unprotected .... I caused to be smitten . .Durrztbilani, son of Arad Jfalak1.l the possessions he took away. Chiefs (Ai) over Babylon and the temple of Bel by the sword I destroyed all that was his: I slaughtered him he burned it with fire. The father and the son by the Rword the son he cut off. In revenge the SOIl .... to slaughter .... he carried away possessions. Chiefs over Babylon and the temple of Bel his son, with the sword all that were his he smote in his pre Hence his dominions before his face Annunit .... Elam, the eity lldt ..... the capital he spoiled ..... remained in ruins, the fortress of the land of Alcl...ad, all the ...... he made an end. au au CU AlA his son, with iron sword .... his chief (umun) in its midst his foe. He took at will the vain kings, and sinful lords Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 02:15 13 May 2016 ... (who) arose in rebellion, for the King of Gods l\1erodach was wroth with them sickness fell upon them, he cursed the place was reduced to ruins. All of them for the King our Lord knowing the wishes of the gods. They were gracious. Mel'odach for Ilis nanle sake ..... and the temple of Bel. lIe said, "Let him return to his place. . . .. 1\'lay he make firm thy heart. Both these 0 King, my lord his foe in his midst, the Gods sin, not to" .

1 NER, "yoke," PAD.DA, "established "-i.e., the established customs. The trallslation of this pa9sage by Dr. Pinches is, however, different. F 82 CHEDOHLAO)fER ON A BABYLONIAN TABLET.

This apparently records the victory over Elam by a native king. Dllrrubilani, son of Malku (or Malaku), was apparently a general 01' official concerned in the war on the side of the conqueror .. An Elamite garrison, under an Urnun or " Prince." was reduced by sickness and siege. The term Ai, reudered "Uhiefs," appears to be also Elamite (Turkish .Ai, " Ohief "), for t.hey spoke a Mongol language, as shown by texts from 8usa, akin to that of the Minyans, Akkadians, Kassites, and . These events-the rebellion of Babylon in ,league with Elam, the spoiling of its temple, and the subsequent defeat of the Elaruite king-- point to the reign of Assurbanipal, King of Assyria, who defeated his brother Samas-sllm-ukin the King of Babylon. The lat.ter allied himself to Ela.nl, and sent the treasure of the temple of Bel from Babylon, and that of the temple of Nergal in Kutha, and of the temple of Nebo ill Borsippa, to Ummanigas, the King of Elam, after breaking open the treasuries. In 648 B.C. Assurbanipal took Babylon, and his brothel' perished in the flames of his palace, while Ummanigas was also defeated hy the Assyrians and fled. Thus all the events meutioned in the preceding tablets, incltHling the rebellion, the Elamite invasion and defeat, the burning of the palace, and especially the spoiling of the tl~mple of Bel, are recorded iudependently in the annals of Assyria. L anl not aware that this comparison has yet been pointl,d onto The struggle with Elanl had begun yet earlier, when Assurbanipal defeated previous kings-Urtaku and Te-Umman-near Susa; and it continued Jnter, again::;t Ulllman-Ahlas ana Tammaritu, who were also defeated. The ruin of Elam perhaps gave opportunity for the establishment of the A ryan Persians in that region, instead of the older Mongol race, whose language, however, continued in use, even to the time of Da.rius, side by side with Persian. By the light of this information we may consider the probable reading of the name represented by the signs OU CU Cl./ OU ..Il[.A: for in some EJamite in8criptions the ideogram CU-Cl./ is ul'3edto siguify a" prince" (c-mun), and the reduplication signifie~ a plural, just as in our second inscription, BEL BEL, stands for the plural of Bel" Lord." The last sign, M.A, has several other sounds, including GA, so that it seems quite possible to read the whole name M U'1nman~qa, which would be equivalent to Ummanigas, if we regard the, as the sign of the nominative, as it i~ in other cOduate dialects, such as the ~linyan, Kassite, and Hittite . Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 02:15 13 May 2016 .For these reasons it appeard to me that we must a.balHlon the proposed identification with Chedorlaomer. Professor Hommel thought that the Lroken word Ha'1nmu~ •.. in the second text might be the name of A.lllraphel, contemporary of Chedorla.Olner, but it is llOt preceded by the special mark for proper names, which occurs in the others in this text. The naine Arad Jf,~u."u,has also been read Eri-Eaku, and supposed to represent ; while Tu,tlcltul(t has been taken as a proper name (), though probably only a common noun. It would have been very interesting to find all these personages (see Gen. xiv, 1) mentioned together, even if only in a copy of an older text, made some 14 centuries after their time; ()BSEltVATJO)\::; O~ TIlE DgAD :-;EA LEVEL. 83

but the explanation has not met wit h favour among scholars, and the name of Chedorlaomer has not been found on any monument, in spite of various attelnpt..~to prove its occurrence.

OBSEH.V.ATIONS ON TIlE DEAD SEA LEVEL.

By I)r. E. 'V. GURNEY )\fASTERMAN. Second lleport, 1902-1903.

[N the ()Marted.1f Statement for April, 1902, I gave a,short account of the re~mlts of the ob£erva.tions on the level of the surface of the Dead Sect from October, 1900, till FebruarY1 1902 ; since then some of my periodical reports lw..vebeen published, but a~ these cannot give a clear idea of the season's changes, I here give a brief summary of the results up to the end of 1903. This forms a particularly suitable time at which to do so, beca.use after this year (lHO:~) the observations are to be taken only hi-anllually. During the last year and a half the method of taking the measure- ments has been lIHWh the ~a.me as that previously described; but ill order to check the re~ults, au additional series of obser\'ations has been commenced from a large rock standing in the middle of the pool into whieh flows most of the water of 'A -in Fesldehalt (see Qua1·terly Statement, IH02, p. 165). Although for several reasons the results there are not 80 a<':(~Ul'a.teasthose taken at the actual s(.·a-shore,yet as checks to the other o1Jserva.tions they are useful. Under instructions from the Com- mit.tee of the l>a,lestine }~xplora,tion .Funu, I have also during my recent visit:-imade observations on the weather, the state of the surface of the sea, il'mperature, atmospheric pressure, &c. ; the results of these I here report. , 1. TIle Change of Leoel at tlte" Observation lloc,{-."·-Dul'ing the I)ast seasons, including those previously reported on, the rise and fall in the Dead Sea. level was as follows :- (1) From October nth, H}OO, to ~Iarch 1st, 1901, a, 'rise occurred of 14::')inches. The level began to fall during l\1arch. Downloaded by [Universite Laval] at 02:15 13 May 2016 (~) From ~iarch, 1901, to December 13th, ] 901,.there was a,fall of 20 inches. The rise commenced in January. (a) }'ronl this to March 21st the water 7'ose 6 inches only, reaching as its highest point for 1902 the 14-feet line which had been the lowest in 1!J00. It is possible that it may have risen a little higher during April, as 011 April 26th the level was found just the same as it had been a, lllOnth previously. (4) :~"l'Onlthis time (.April 26th) the waterfelll·~ inches till May 30th, and then rapidly duriug the sunlmer, so that by October 24th it had fallt~1l,t total of ~G inches. Thi~, the lowest measurenlent for the 190~ F2