The Introduction of Grapes and Alfalfa Into China: a Re‰Ection on the Role of Zhang Qian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Introduction of Grapes and Alfalfa Into China: a Re‰Ection on the Role of Zhang Qian hon p.1 [100%] YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 125(11) 895―898 (2005) 2005 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan 895 ―Notes― The Introduction of Grapes and Alfalfa into China: A Re‰ection on the Role of Zhang Qian Masao UCHIBAYASHI Takeda Science Foundation, Juso-honmachi, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 5328686, Japan (Received June 23, 2005; Accepted August 24, 2005) There is a prevailing legend that grapes and alfalfa were introduced to China from West Asia by Zhang Qian in 126 BC. This paper intends to show the legend to be a misconception. The three crucial documents were thoroughly ex- amined, and the author believes he can demonstrate that it was a later traveler who actually brought these two plants to China following the trade route pioneered by Zhang Qian. Key words―grapes; alfalfa; Zhang Qian; China voy imported the seeds (of the grapevine and alfalfa) THE LEGEND on his way back (to China). The emperor thereupon Grapes and alfalfa (or lucerne) were introduced to caused alfalfa and grapevine to be planted on rich ChinafromWestAsiabyZhangQianin126BC.This tracts of ground. has been the generally accepted view. A Sino-Iranologist, Bernhold Laufer,7) in 1919 In 1915, Professor Jitsuzo Kuwahara at Kyoto translated the same chapter of Shi ji as follows: denounced the view as an untenable misconception,1) They (thepeopleofDayuan) were fond of drink- but his contention remained within a limited academ- ing wine in the same manner as their horses relished ic circle. It was the traditional view that survived alfalfa. The Chinese envoystook the seeds of both without debate or reconsideration. plants along to their country, and the Son of Heaven This paper will elaborate on Prof. Kuwahara's was the ˆrst to plant alfalfa and the vine in fertile soil report and aims to set the historical record straight, (Note the plural form). that is, to make clear that it was not Zhang Qian, but The present author's literal translation of the cru- someone else, who introduced grapes and alfalfa to cial part is that Han shi (Han's envoy) came back (to China (Zhang Qian is abbreviated as ZQ hereafter). China) after collecting the seeds (of grapes and alfal- fa). For the sake of conˆrmation, the passage in THE HISTORY question is shown in Chinese: 漢使取其實来(史 For discussion, three historical documents merit 記・大宛列傅). particular attention: (2) Han shu,initsXiYuBiography,recordsin 1. Shi ji(史記)2) or the earliest Record of the thesamewaythatHanshicameback(to China) af- History of Ancient China compiled by Si Maqian in tergatheringtheseedsofgrapesandalfalfa.Forcon- 91 BC ˆrmation again, the passage in Chinese is: 漢使采蒲 2. Han shu(漢書)3) or the Annals of the Han 陶目宿種歸(漢書・西域傳). Dynasty written by Ban Gu around AD 78 As shown above and as Prof. Kuwahara pointed out 3. Bowu zhi(博物志)4) or the Record of the earlier, both Shi ji and Han shu say that it was Han Natural History by Zhang Hua about AD 300. shi (Han's envoy) who introduced grapes and alfalfa (1) Shi ji, in the chapter of the Da Yuan into China, and neither names ZQ. Biography, contains this description, translated into (3) Bowu zhi, the third document, is cited to English by F. Hirth in 1917 and quoted by J. have contained such passages as these: Needham6) in 1986: ZQ was on a mission to Xi yu (the Western The people (of Da yuan) liked to drink wine, and Region) and returned home after obtaining the their horses liked to eat alfalfa grass. The Chinese en- seeds (of grape) for the ˆrst time. ZQ was on a mission to Xi yu and returned home Present address: 2101, Obe, Kawanishi 6660014, Japan after obtaining grape (vine). hon p.2 [100%] 896 Vol. 125 (2005) ZQ was on a mission to Xi yu and returnd home HAN SHI IN SHI JI after obtaining grape, shallot and alfalfa. The emperor Wu of Han sent ZQ as his envoy to Now the author intends to clarify that Han shi was Da yuan, and obtained grape seeds. never meant to be an indirect reference to ZQ; it was An alfalfa garden of ZQ is situated now in the so written by Zhang Hua of Bowu zhi as a result of capital town (Luo yang). Alfalfa was originally his misinterpretation of the term. a vegetable grown in West Asia and ZQ was the A close examination was made of the use of the ˆrst to have it in the Western Countries. name of the envoy himself as well as the term Han shi These passages have been quoted repeatedly in later in the entire text of the Da Yuan Biography in Shi ji, documents5) such as Shuyi ji (ca.500), Zhaimin keeping in mind that the story is written in more-or- yaoshu (ca.535), Taiping yulan (984), Tujing bencao less chronological order. To indicate the actual man, (1062), Daguan bencao (1108), and Bencao gangmu the name ZQ occurs ˆve times and is shortened to (1578) all of which contributed to the prevailing Qian 35 times. The individual's name never appears legend in the Tang and Song era that ZQ had brought in the story that covers the period after ZQ's death. grapes and alfalfa to China. The term Han shi is used 28 times, 25 of them in the Bowu zhi itself is known to have undergone trans- section that follows ZQ's death. forming alterations in which the original version con- So, let us look at these three mentions of Han shi sisting of 400 volumes, was contracted to ten by the before ZQ's death. emperor Wu of Jin by deleting supposedly unreliable Qian told the chief of the Da yuan tribe of his in- or unrealistic stories. At a later time, Bowu zhi was tention to visit Yue zhi in the capacity of Han totally lost and then reconstructed by several authors, shi. who collected then-available quotations found in the The Kun ming tribe, violent plunderers with no various documents. Today, the several editions made leader, killed Han shi (an emissary sent by at diŠerent times in Song and Ming are known to ex- Qian). ist. ThechiefoftheWusuntribefailedtooŠera The present author's careful perusal of the existing respectful reception to Han shi, not following editions of Bowi zhi, nine of which are available to their customary dutiful protocol, and Qian was him, discloses no clear description of ZQ's introduc- much chagrined. tion of the two plants to China. Other researchers In these three quotations, the relationship of Han shi agree with the author that it is indeed nonexistent. with ZQ is clearly seen. There are only two references to ZQ in the existing There is only one exceptional occurrence, out of the editions of Bowu zhi: 25 instances, in which Han shi is said explicitly to be Han shi ZQ went over to the Western Sea Region ZQ, and it must be discussed here. to reach the Roman Empire. Well after ZQ's death in the text chronologically, ZQ was on a mission to Xi yu and returned home there are descriptions like this: Han shi reached the after obtaining walnut seeds. riverhead (of the Yellow River) which originated As can be clearly seen, the term Han shi (Chinese from Yu tian, and the mountain yields many jade envoy) in Shi ji and in Han shu was rewritten as ZQ stones, which were collected (by Han shi) to bring by Zhang Hua in Bowu zhi. From the context, the back (to China). Several paragraphs later, the present author is unable to comprehend why Zhang description in question occurs: Han shi came back af- Hua wrote Han shi as ZQ. Was this interpretation ter picking the seeds. current during his time, or did he base it on some un- In the addendum placed at the end of the disclosed source of information? The present author Biography text, Taishi gong (another name of Shi would point out that this rewriting of the term Han ji''s author) states that ZQ went on a mission to Da shi as ZQ is most likely the source of today's con- xia (Tokhari) and reached the riverhead (of the Yel- tinuing misconception about the origin of grapes and low River) for the ˆrst time. This statement can be alfalfa in China. read as equating the Han shi described in the main text as ZQ himself. But let us examine the validity of Taishi gong's in- hon p.3 [100%] No. 11 897 terpretation, in this sole instance, of Han shi as ZQ. more likely, implicitly to ZQ himself. The author, To restate the quotation, Han shi reached the however, has already deduced that the envoy in ques- riverhead, which originated from Yu tian. On his way tion was not ZQ. back to China, ZQ is believed to have taken the so- THE INFLUENCE OF ADMIRATION IN calledSouthernRoute,whichindeedpassesYutian, HISTORIC INTERPRETATION located at the southernmost edge of the Taklimakan Desert in the Xinjian Uygur Province. In the It may be, however, that later historians were neighborhood of this oasis, the river Keriya he ‰ows moved by admiration to attribute the signiˆcant in- north. This river, however, has nothing whatever to troduction of these plants to so remarkable a per- do with the head of the Yellow River, identiˆed today sonality as ZQ, who had come to be called the as being in the distant Qinghai Province. Chinese (or Oriental) Columbus. Certainly ZQ ZQ was never known to have undertaken an expe- would have been well aware of his emperor's ardent dition into deep mountain areas to ˆnd the riverhead, desire to augment his stables with the ``heavenly'' nor to have brought jade stones back home.
Recommended publications
  • Eastern and Western Look at the History of the Silk Road
    Journal of Critical Reviews ISSN- 2394-5125 Vol 7, Issue 9, 2020 EASTERN AND WESTERN LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THE SILK ROAD Kobzeva Olga1, Siddikov Ravshan2, Doroshenko Tatyana3, Atadjanova Sayora4, Ktaybekov Salamat5 1Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 2Docent, Candidate of historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 3Docent, Candidate of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 4Docent, Candidate of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 5Lecturer at the History faculty, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] Received: 17.03.2020 Revised: 02.04.2020 Accepted: 11.05.2020 Abstract This article discusses the eastern and western views of the Great Silk Road as well as the works of scientists who studied the Great Silk Road. The main direction goes to the historiography of the Great Silk Road of 19-21 centuries. Keywords: Great Silk Road, Silk, East, West, China, Historiography, Zhang Qian, Sogdians, Trade and etc. © 2020 by Advance Scientific Research. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.17 INTRODUCTION another temple in Suzhou, sacrifices are offered so-called to the The historiography of the Great Silk Road has thousands of “Yellow Emperor”, who according to a legend, with the help of 12 articles, monographs, essays, and other kinds of investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Essential Questions? Lesson Objectives
    Silk Road Curriculum Project 2018-2019 Ingrid Herskind Title of Lesson Plan: Silk Road: Cartography and Trade in Ancient and Modern China Ingrid Herskind, Flintridge Prep School, La Canada, CA Lesson Overview: Students will explore the “Silk Road” trade networks by investigating a route, mapping the best path, and portraying a character who navigated the route. Opening essential questions? How did the Silk Road routes represent an early version of worldwide integration and development? How does China’s modern One Belt, One Road project use similar routes and methodologies as the earlier Silk Road project? How is this modern project different? Lesson Objectives: Students will be able to: Students will also apply skills from the Global Competence Matrix and will: • Investigate the world beyond their immediate environment by identifying an issue, generating a question, and explaining its significance locally, regionally, and globally. • Recognize their own and others’ perspectives by understanding the influences that impact those perspectives. • Communicate their ideas effectively with diverse audiences by realizing how their ideas and delivery can be perceived. • Translate their ideas and findings into appropriate actions to improve conditions and to create opportunities for personal and collaborative action. 1 1 World Savvy, Global Competence Matrix, Council of Chief State School Officers’ EdSteps Project in partnership with the Asia Society Partnership for Global Learning, 2010 1 Silk Road Curriculum Project 2018-2019 Ingrid Herskind Length of Project: This lesson as designed to take place over 2-3 days (periods are either 45 min or 77 min) in 9th Grade World History. Grade Level: High School (gr 9) World History, variation in International Relations 12th grade Historical Context: • China was a key player in the networks that crossed from one continent to another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of the Silk Road 161
    'T GLOBAL CONTACTS: THE OPENING 25 OF THE SILK ROAD During the early Han dynasty (206 B.cE.-220 CE.) Chinese emperors began to send large amounts of silk-for both diplomatic and commercial reasons-to the nomads of Central Asia, especially the Xiongnu. Within a short time some of this silk found its way, by means of a type of relay trade, to Rome. Modern scholars refer to the East- West routes on which the fabric, and other commodities, moved as the Silk Road. By 100 CE. the land routes linking China to Rome also had a maritime counterpart. Seaborne commerce flourished between Rome and India via the Red Sea and the Ara- bian Sea. Other routes farther east, connected Indian ports with harbors in Southeast Asia and China. A great Afro-Eurasian commercial network had now come into being. Silk from China (the only country that produced it until after 500 CE.), pepper and jewels from India, and incense from Arabia were sent to the Mediterranean region on routes that ter- minated in Roman cities such as Alexandria, Gaza, Antioch, and Ephesus. In exchange for the precious commodities, the Romans sent large amounts of silver and gold east- ward to destinations in Asia. Because the long-distance trade of the classical period was mainly in luxuries rather than in articles of daily use, its overall economic impact was probably limited. Most present-day historians think that the Rome-India-China trade was significant pri- marily because of its role in promoting the spread of religions, styles of art, technologies, and epidemic diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of the Silk Road
    ,~ GLOBAL CONTACTS: THE OPENING 25 OF THE SILK ROAD , . During the early Han dynasty (206 B.C.E,-220 C.E.)Chinese emperors began to send large amounts of silk-for both diplomatic and commercial reasons-to the nomads of Central Asia, especially the Xiongnu. Within a short time some of this silk found its way, by means of a type of relay trade, to Rome. Modern scholars refer to the East- West routes on which the fabric, and other commodities, moved as the Silk Road. By 100 C.E.the land routes linking China to Rome also had "a maritime counterpart. Seaborne commerce flourished between Rome and India via the Red Sea and the Ara- bian Sea. Other routes farther east, connected Indian ports with harbors in Southeast Asia and China. A great Afro-Eurasian commercial network had now come into being. Silk from China (the only country that produced it until after 500 CE.), pepper and jewels from India, and incense from Arabia were sent to the Mediterranean region on routes that ter-' minated in Roman cities such as Alexandria, Gaza, Antioch, and Ephesus. In exchange for the precious commodities, the Romans sent large amounts of silver and gold east- ward to destinations in Asia. Because the long-distance trade of the classical period was mainly in luxuries rather than in articles of daily use, its overall economic impact was probably limited. Most present-day historians think that the Rome-India-China trade was significant pri- '"", ",' ~. marily becauseof its role in promoting the spreadof religions, styles of art, technologies, and epidemic diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • BUDDHISM (Statue of Buddha) This Statue, Dating to the Year 338 C
    BUDDHISM (Statue of Buddha) This statue, dating to the year 338 C. E., is the earliest known depiction of a Chinese Buddha. Buddhism, which originated in India during the fifth century B.C.E, was gradually introduced into China through Central Asia via the Silk Road. Buddhism, which entered China during the Han dynasty, was influenced by other religions that were present in Central Asia at that time. Once in China, Buddhism was combined, for a time, with another popular Chinese belief system, Daoism. In fact, until the end of the Han dynasty, the two belief systems were virtually one and shared many beliefs. The early statues of Chinese Buddhas resembled the statues of Indian Buddhas from the fourth to fifth centuries B.C.E., but have some different features. For example, the Buddha pictured here has a more rounded head than his Indian counterpart; his nose is sculpted as a simple wedge; and his eyes, which are closed, look Chinese. TRANSPORTATION (Camel Figurine) This twin-humped camel was introduced into China from Bactria (BOK-tree-ah), in southwestern Asia, sometime around the first century B.C.E. As trade along the Silk Road grew, these pack animals became greatly valued for their ability to travel long distances over mountains and across deserts. Camels were uniquely suited to crossing the roughest terrain in an extremely difficult climate because they could go for days without food or water by living off the fat stored in their humps. Chinese traders used camels to transport such goods as silk, jade, tea, spices, and grain to the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Silk Roads in History by Daniel C
    The Silk Roads in History by daniel c. waugh here is an endless popular fascination with cultures and peoples, about whose identities we still know too the “Silk Roads,” the historic routes of eco- little. Many of the exchanges documented by archaeological nomic and cultural exchange across Eurasia. research were surely the result of contact between various The phrase in our own time has been used as ethnic or linguistic groups over time. The reader should keep a metaphor for Central Asian oil pipelines, and these qualifications in mind in reviewing the highlights from Tit is common advertising copy for the romantic exoticism of the history which follows. expensive adventure travel. One would think that, in the cen- tury and a third since the German geographer Ferdinand von Richthofen coined the term to describe what for him was a The Beginnings quite specific route of east-west trade some 2,000 years ago, there might be some consensus as to what and when the Silk Among the most exciting archaeological discoveries of the Roads were. Yet, as the Penn Museum exhibition of Silk Road 20th century were the frozen tombs of the nomadic pastoral- artifacts demonstrates, we are still learning about that history, ists who occupied the Altai mountain region around Pazyryk and many aspects of it are subject to vigorous scholarly debate. in southern Siberia in the middle of the 1st millennium BCE. Most today would agree that Richthofen’s original concept These horsemen have been identified with the Scythians who was too limited in that he was concerned first of all about the dominated the steppes from Eastern Europe to Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ornamental Trousers from Sampula (Xinjiang, China): Their Origins and Biography
    The ornamental trousers from Sampula (Xinjiang, China): their origins and Biography Mayke Wagner1*, Wang Bo2, Pavel Tarasov3, Sidsel Maria Westh-Hansen4, Elisabeth Völling5 & Jonas Heller1 Published in: ANTIQUITY 83 (2009): 1065–1075. A decorated pair of trousers excavated from a well-preserved tomb in the Tarim Basin proved to have a highly informative life history, teased out by the authors – with archaeological, historical and art historical dexterity. Probably created under Greek influence in a Bactrian palace, the textile started life in the third/second century BC as an ornamental wall hanging, showing a centaur blowing a war-trumpet and a nearly life-size warrior of the steppe with his spear. The palace was raided by nomads, one of whom worked a piece of the tapestry into a pair of trousers. They brought no great luck to the wearer who ended his days in a massacre by the Xiongnu, probably in the first century BC. The biography of this garment gives a vivid glimpse of the dynamic life of Central Asia at the end of the first millennium. Keywords: China, Tarim, Xinjiang, Iron Age, Greek, Macedonian, textiles, wall hanging, trousers, centaur, Xiongnu (1065) Introduction Since the discovery of mummies in the Tarim Basin in Xinjiang (e.g. Wang 1999; Figure 1), cultural contacts and migrations of the early inhabitants of eastern Central Asia have become intensely debated issues (e.g. Posch 1995; Mair 1998; Parzinger 2008). Information about this area appears in Chinese historical records only after 126 BC, when Zhang Qian returned to the Imperial court in Chang’an from his first voyage to the West (Hulsewé 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Xinjiang?The Transition in Chinese Intellectuals'imagination Of
    2011 WHOSE XINJIANG? THE TRANSITION IN HARVARD-YENCHING CHINESE INTELLECTUALS’ IMAGINATION INSTITUTE WORKING OF THE “NEW DOMINION” DURING THE PAPER SERIES QING DYNASTY Jia Jianfei | Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Whose Xinjiang? The Transition in Chinese intellectuals’ imagination of the “New Dominion” during the Qing dynasty Jia Jianfei Abstract: Though Xinjiang (literarily the ―New Dominion‖) was incorporated into China’s territory permanently in the mid-18th century during Emperor Qianlong’s reign, Jiayu Guan (嘉 峪关) still marked a boundary between Xinjiang and China proper, much like Yang Guan (阳关) and Yumen Guan (玉门关) in the Han and Tang dynasties. Such a boundary was infused with cultural meaning since ancient times: it separated different cultures, and territories beyond the pass were accordingly not be regarded as part of China. This understanding of cultural boundaries deeply influenced Han Chinese officials and intellectuals; no wonder few Han Chinese supported the Qing emperors’ military plans in Xinjiang during the conquest. Even after the Qing conquest of Xinjiang, such conceptions remained relevant and fueled controversy over Xinjiang, lasting to the end of Qing dynasty and even into the Republic. However, these ideas gradually weakened over time, resulting in the re-conquest of Xinjiang during the 1860s and 1870s by Zuo Zongtang (左宗棠), a Han Chinese, the establishment of Xinjiang province in 1884, and the swift development of Xinjiang-studies during the Guangxu reign period (1875-1908). Indeed, the place of Xinjiang in Han Chinese intellectuals’ imagination had changed significantly, and this change played a key role in the crystallization of modern China’s boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the History of the Relationship Between the Western and Eastern Han, Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties and the Western Regions
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 173 October, 2006 A Study of the History of the Relationship Between the Western and Eastern Han, Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties and the Western Regions by Taishan YU Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies. Sinographs (hanzi, also called tetragraphs [fangkuaizi]) and other unusual symbols should be kept to an absolute minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on Dayuezhi, Daxia, Guishuang, and Dumi in Chinese Sources
    SOME NOTES ON DAYUEZHI, DAXIA, GUISHUANG, AND DUMI IN CHINESE SOURCES Yang Juping ᶘᐘᒣ Nankai University ইᔰབྷᆖ Tianjin, China ѝഭཙ⍕ axia (བྷ༿), Dayuezhi (བྷᴸ∿), and Guishuang (䋤 original sources from Chinese, even though various D 䵌) were three different countries once active in translations of them have been published previously ancient Central Asia and were known to Chinese of (e.g., Brosset 1828; Wylie 1881-82; Hirth 1917; Sima the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE). There is general Qian 1993; Hulsewé 1979; Hill 2015). agreement that the kingdom of Daxia was conquered by the Dayuezhi tribes who had immigrated from 1. The records in the Shiji. northwest China and then divided the country into 'D\XH]KL DQG 'D[LD ZHUH ÀUVW LQWURGXFHG LQ WKH .yabgu).1 “Description of Dayuan” (བྷᇋࡇۣ) in the Shiji ן㘆 ÀYH SDUWV HDFK JRYHUQHG E\ D ;LKRX One of them, the Guishuang Xihou, united all the The Dayuezhi are west of Dayuan (བྷᇋ) by about two or lands of Dayuezhi and established a new kingdom of three thousand li (䟼)2 and are located north of the Oxus ( Guishuang (Kushan) which later became an Empire ჟ≤) [Wei Shui, the Amu Darya]. Daxia lies to the south, including a large part of Central Asia around the Amu Anxi (ᆹ᚟) to the west, and Kangju (ᓧት) to the north. Darya and northwest of India. However, in recent Dayuezhi is a nation of nomads (㹼഻) [literally, ‘moving years there have been some disagreements about country’] wandering with their herds and practicing the these peoples in Chinese academia, such as where same customs as those of the Xiongnu (सྤ).
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Effects of Seemingly Controversial Lifestyles on Xiongnu’S Survive in Harsh Environment During Han Dynasty
    The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 3, Issue 1: 136-140, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2021.030121 Beneficial Effects of Seemingly Controversial Lifestyles on Xiongnu’s Survive in Harsh Environment during Han Dynasty Tianji Sun Hangzhou Jianlan Middle School, Hangzhou, 202005, China E-mail: 735273045@qq,com Abstract: Xiongnu is a really barbaric tribe on the meadows. However, it is their barbaric lifestyles that helping them survive in the harsh environment. In this work, some Xiongnu’s lifestyles are analyzed in detail, which are different from Han Dynasty. Moreover, this work also come up with some new understanding of these seemingly controversial lifestyles. It can be helpful in changing the traditional ideas towards Xiongnu for many people. Keywords: Xiongnu, Barbaric lifestyles, Wars, Survive, Han Dynasty 1. Introduction Xiongnu (or Hsiung-nu) were a nomadic tribe in northern China and modern-day Mongolia during the Han Dynasty (202 BCE - 8 CE). They primarily raised horses, oxen, sheep, and even camels, on the pasturage. The Xiongnu were considered nomadic, because they traveled from place to place with no fixed city or home, searching for food and water. Xiongnu were not agriculturally self-sufficient, but traveled from place to place based on seasons and weather to find sufficient food and shelter. Historians have struggled to study the Xiongnu due to a lack of written texts written by the Xiongnu, depicting their everyday lives. Since the Xiongnu lived on the meadow, a large grassland with barren soil, they lacked resources (e.g. vegetables, fruits, crops, and tea) necessary for their survival, forcing them to obtain supplies from Han.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Silk Road
    Introduction Morris Rossabi Globalization has become so identifi ed with the late twentieth and early twenty-fi rst centuries that it seems to overshadow earlier eras of international relations. Many in the modern world have associated such contacts with recent times, a view that prevailed in education as well. For example, most so-called World History courses in secondary schools and community colleges placed Europe at the center, consider- ing other civilizations principally when they interacted with the West. A global history perspective would reveal that globalization, in the form of East-West relations that signifi cantly infl uenced both, far predated the twentieth century. The World History Association pioneered such a global history approach. Established in the 1980s, it founded the Journal of World His- tory as an exemplar of the latest research that links political, cultural, and social interactions among civilizations. Textbooks with an emphasis on global history have proliferated over the past few decades. Many simply provide the history of individual civilizations in separate chapters, but a few have attempted to integrate developments in one part of the world with other regions. Such efforts at global history have gone beyond the previous Eurocentric views. Study of the Silk Roads, in particular, offers a unique means of conveying the signifi cance of intercultural relations. Although most historians date the origins of the Silk Roads with the Han dynasty mission of Zhang Qian to Central Asia in the second century,BCE, contacts between China and Central Asia no doubt preceded that time, as evidenced by scraps of silk (which only the Chinese then knew how to produce) in Middle Eastern tombs centuries before Zhang’s expedi- tion.
    [Show full text]