DOCSLIB.ORG

APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 1, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 1, 2016 APSA Contributors AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2016 his list celebrates the generous contributions of our mem- Rogers M. Smith Robert J-P. Hauck bers in giving to one or more of the following programs from Paul M. Sniderman Mary Hawkesworth 1996 through the 2016 fiscal year: APSA Awards, programs, T Mary E. Stuckey Mary A. Hepburn and the Congressional Fellowship Program. APSA thanks these donors for ensuring that the benefits of membership and the influ- Charles V. Walker John F. Hoadley ence of the profession will extend far into the future. APSA updates Susan Welch Matthew Holden, Jr. and prints this list annually in the January issue of PS. Thomas R. Wolanin Anne H. Hopkins Nancy H. Zingale Robert Huckfeldt CENTENNIAL CIRCLE Susan C. Bourque University of New Mexico Karen M. Hult ($25,000+) David W. Brady Organized Section on Religion Patricia W. Ingraham Doris A. Graber John G. Bretting and Politics Kent Jennings Chun-tu Hsueh Foundation Robert F. Durant Yale University Robert Jervis Arend Lijphart Luis Ricardo Fraga Loch K. Johnson Beryl A. Radin James L. Gibson BUILDER’S CIRCLE Charles O. Jones ($2,500+) Paul A. Volcker Ira Goldstein William J. Keefe Alan I. Abramowitz University of Louisville John Mark Hansen Herbert Kitschelt Martha A. Ackelsberg John P. Harrod Allan Kornberg 1903 CIRCLE David Adamany Martin O. Heisler Kay Lawson ($15,000+) Eugene J. Alpert Jennifer L. Hochschild Avery Leiserson Richard F. Fenno James E. Anderson Robert A. Horn Burdett A. Loomis Jo Freeman Gary J. Andres Gary C. Jacobson Susan A. MacManus Robert O. Keohane Patricia Artinian Bryan D. Jones David B. Magleby Robert Merry Mary Fainsod Katzenstein Manuel Avalos Thomas E. Mann Nancy Waclawek Ira Katznelson William I. Bacchus David R. Mares Stephen L. Wasby Margaret Levi Michael A. Baer Joel Margolis University of Iowa Sydnee Guyer Lipset Paul Allen Beck David R. Mayhew Policy Studies Organization Theodore J. Lowi John F. Bibby Daniel A. Mazmanian Pi Sigma Alpha Jane Mansbridge Amy B. Bridges Dorothy E. McBride Valerie J. Martinez-Ebers Michael A. Brintnall Eileen McDonagh 2003 CIRCLE ($10,000+) Paula D. McClain David S. Broder Lorraine M. McDonnell Charles S. Bullock, III Roger H. Davidson Cynthia McClintock Nancy R. McWilliams Margaret Cawley Ruth S. Jones Ruth P. Morgan Melissa R. Michelson Philip E. Converse Martha Joynt Kumar Norman J. Ornstein Jeffrey R. Miller William J. Daniels Dale Rogers Marshall T.J. Pempel James A. Morone Christopher J. Deering Ken Meier Dianne M. Pinderhughes Julie L. Novkov Lawrence C. Dodd Robert D. Putnam Ben F. Reeves Karen O’Connor Jorge I. Dominguez Ronald J Schmidt, Sr. Paul J. Rich David Scott Palmer Marion E. Doro Smith College David B. Robertson Leonard Parkinson Melvin J. Dubnick Northwestern University Catherine E. Rudder Carole Pateman Kay Lehman Schlozman Kathleen A. Frankovic Desiree S. Pedescleaux FOUNDER’S CIRCLE Mr Eric J. Scott Beth C. Fuchs Gerald M. Pomper ($5,000+) Merrill Shanks John Armando Garcia Mary Cornelia Porter Tony Affigne Kenneth Sherrill George J. Graham James J. Prestage Barbara B. Bardes Lee Sigelman Virginia H. Gray George H. Quester Lucius J. Barker Howard J. Silver Joel B. Grossman Nicol C. Rae Robert H. Bates William O. Slayman Charles D. Hadley Randall B. Ripley © American Political Science Association, 2017 PS • January 2017 305 APSA Contributors Ronald L. Rogowski Samuel H. Barnes Michael K. Fauntroy Thomas P. Lauth Alan Rosenthal Larry M. Bartels Morris Fiorina Cambridge University Press Mildred A. Schwartz Harold F. Bass James S. Fishkin David L. Leal Gary M. Segura Pamela Bataillon Lynne E. Ford Frances E. Lee W. Phillips Shively Frank R. Baumgartner Jane E. Fountain David C. Leege Barbara Sinclair Samuel H. Beer Linda L. Fowler Gregory B. Lewis John D. Sprague Seth B B. Benjamin George Frederickson Gerhard Loewenberg Harvey Starr Jeffrey M. Berry William E. Frenzel Linda Lopez Joseph Stewart, Jr. Henry S. Bienen Jerry Warden Friedheim Nancy Sue Love Judith H. Stiehm James Warner Bjorkman Jurg Martin Gabriel Arthur Lupia James A. Stimson Christopher Bosso F. Chris Garcia L. Sandy Maisel Camilla M. Stivers Janet M. Box- Lisa Garcia Bedolla Melanie Frances Manion Steffensmeier Clarence N. Stone Louis C. Gawthrop Sheilah Mann Richard W. Boyd Jonathan R. Strand Irwin N. Gertzog Benjamin Marquez John Brademas James A. Thurber Judith Lynn Goldstein Janet M. Martin Henry E. Brady Sue Tolleson-Rinehart Samuel K. Gove Alison Rios Millett McCartney Steven J. Brams Toni-Michelle Travis Fred I. Greenstein Karen M. McCurdy Richard A. Brody Sidney Verba Glen A. Halva-Neubauer Richard L. Merritt Mitchell Brown John C. Wahlke Susan Webb Hammond Warren E. Miller Nancy E. Brune Charles E. Walker Roderick P. Hart William Mishler Frances Burke Brandon Walton Kerry L. Haynie Charles L. Mitchell Paul J. Weber Elizabeth Capell Jeffrey R. Henig Robert Montjoy Graham K. Wilson Lief H. Carter C. Randall Henning Christopher Z. Mooney Lois R. Wise Gretchen G. Casper Rodney E. Hero Lois B. Moreland Maurice C. Woodard Bruce E. Caswell Paul S. Herrnson Richard G. Niemi Eastern Michigan University Leonard Champney Donald V. Hester Helmut Norpoth Women’s Caucus for Political Eugene Y. S. Chang Kim Quaile Hill John S. Odell Science Daniel S. Cheever Milton E. Hill Marion Orr University of Texas, Austin Vice President Richard Ole R. Holsti Kenneth T. Palmer Juan March Institute Cheney J. Woodford Howard, Jr. Glenn R. Parker University of Oslo Clarke E. Cochran University of California-Los Louise K. Comfort Robert J. Huckshorn William D. Pederson Angeles Ms Sara Connor William E. Hudson Mark A. Peterson Walnut Foundation M. Margaret Conway Robert P. Huefner John J. Pitney, Jr. H.D. Smith Foundation Martha Crenshaw Vincent L. Hutchings Nelson W. Polsby Missouri Poltiical Science Tom E. Cronin Dennis S. Ippolito Lynda W. Powell Association Milton C. Cummings, Jr. John Ishiyama Henry J. Pratt Harold D. Lasswell Society Vincent Davis Kenneth Janda Barbara A. Presnall Michael C. Dawson James Jennings Michael B. Preston SECOND CENTURY SOCIETY Richard E. DeLeon Bruce W. Jentleson Kenneth Prewitt ($1,000+) Patrick J. Deneen Calvin C. Jillson The Honorable David E. Price John H. Aldrich Louis DeSipio Nolan E. Jones Philip L. Pritchett Herbert E. Alexander Christine Di Stefano Mark P. Jones Rosemary A. Putnam Hayward R. Alker Alexander A. Doska Michael A. Jones-Correa Lyn Ragsdale Herbert B. Asher Delmer D. Dunn Jane Y. Junn Andree E. Reeves David Austen-Smith Thomas R. Dye Melvin A. Kahn Thomas F. Remington Robert Axelrod George C. Edwards, III Nancy Kassop Chester D. Rhoan Judith A. Baer Cynthia Enloe Stanley Kelley, Jr. Leroy N. Rieselbach Lee Ann Banaszak Maria J. Falco Samuel Krislov Emeritus Bert A. Rockman Maryann Barakso Victoria A. Farrar-Myers Janet M. Laible Richard Rose 306 PS • January 2017 © American Political Science Association, 2017 APSA Contributors Loren D. Ross Melissa S. Williams M. Kenneth Bowler John R. Hibbing Donald Rothchild David M. Wilson Ann O’M. Bowman Kim Hildred Larry J. Sabato Raymond E. Wolfinger Karlyn Bowman John W. Holcombe Scott D. Sagan Elisabeth Jean Wood Stanley C. Brubaker Xiaobo Hu Mark Q. Sawyer Robert C. Wood Carol Buckland Evelyne Huber Philippe C. Schmitter Deil S. Wright Emmett H. Buell, Jr. Juan Carlos Huerta Thomas S. Schrock Dali L. Yang Bruce J. Bueno de Patricia A. Hurley Mesquita Peregrine Schwartz-Shea Martynas A. Ycas Wallace E. Hutton Nancy Burns Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott James Sterling Young Tomoaki Iwai Gerard Patrick Bushell Sally Coleman Selden James V. Young Lawrence R. Jacobs Michael P. Canning Ronald G. Shaiko Charles E. Young Harold K. Jacobson David A. Caputo Donna E. Shalala Robert L. Youngblood Amaney Jamal Jason P. Casellas Christine Marie Sierra John R. Zaller Tobe Johnson Janet M. Clark Dick W. Simpson Pamela A. Zeiser Richard Johnston Susan E. Clarke Theda Skocpol Joseph F. Zimmerman W. Landis Jones David L. Coleman Anne-Marie Slaughter Michael P. Zuckert Peter H. Juviler David Collier Elliot E. Slotnick The Claremont Institute Miles Kahler Joseph Cooper Steven Rathgeb Smith California Community Max M. Kampelman Foundation Gary W. Cox Duncan Snidal Karen M. Kaufmann University of Wisconsin, Charles Jeremy Curtoys Robert J. Spitzer Margaret E. Keck Milwaukee Nancy Davidson Sean Q Kelly Thomas A. Spragens, Jr. The Haworth Press, Inc. George Tinsley Davies Mark A. Kessler Harold W. Stanley Boston University Rodolfo O. de la Garza Donald F. Kettl Sybil L. Stokes University of New Orleans Michelle D. Deardorff Anthony King Gerald H. Stollman Women’s Caucus for Political Linda C. Degutis Charles E. King Prof. Deborah Stone Science: West Brendan J. Doherty Tyson D. Floyd E. Stoner University of Houston Delia E. Donatelli King-Meadows Dara Z. Strolovitch American Review of Public Georgia Duerst-Lahti Samuel A. Kirkpatrick Michael W. Suleiman Administration Christopher H. Foreman, Jr. Gary Klass James L. Sundquist University of California-Los Angeles Jeffry A. Frieden Robin A. Kolodny Sidney Tarrow Kent Gardner Cynthia N. Ladd Raymond Tatalovich ANNIVERSARY SOCIETY Michael Garrety David A. Lake Elizabeth Theiss-Morse ($500+) John B. Gates Peter Lange Dennis F. Thompson Gabriele Abels Harvey Glickman Miriam J. Laugesen Jim J Tozzi Joel D. Aberbach Marissa Martino Golden Logan A. Lee Joan C. Tronto Janet Lee Abrahm Miriam A. Golden Jan E. Leighley George Tsebelis Yvette M. Alex-Assensoh Kenneth Goldstein Ralph Lerner Arturo Vega Stephen Amberg Robert T. Golembiewski William F. Levantrosser David Vogel Kristi Andersen Leonard E. Goodall Mark I. Lichbach Kenneth Vogel Lisa Anderson Charles W. Gossett Evan S. Lieberman Charles E. Walcott John W. Anderson Robert C. Grady Serge E. Logan Kenneth D. Wald Christopher J. Anderson Jose Angel Gutierrez Robert Lorish Robert S. Wallerstein Lisa Baldez Henry E. Hale David Lowery Richard D. Warden Lewis Bateman Melinda Gann Hall DeWayne L. Lucas Lionel Washington Lawrence Baum Susan B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theory of War and Peace: Theories and Cases COURSE TITLE 2
    Ilia State University Faculty of Arts and Sciences MA Level Course Syllabus 1. Theory of War and Peace: Theories and Cases COURSE TITLE 2. Spring Term COURSE DURATION 3. 6.0 ECTS 4. DISTRIBUTION OF HOURS Contact Hours • Lectures – 14 hours • Seminars – 12 hours • Midterm Exam – 2 hours • Final Exam – 2 hours • Research Project Presentation – 2 hours Independent Work - 118 hours Total – 150 hours 5. Nino Pavlenishvili INSTRUCTOR Associate Professor, PhD Ilia State University Mobile: 555 17 19 03 E-mail: [email protected] 6. None PREREQUISITES 7. Interactive lectures, topic-specific seminars with INSTRUCTION METHODS deliberations, debates, and group discussions; and individual presentation of the analytical memos, and project presentation (research paper and PowerPoint slideshow) 8. Within the course the students are to be introduced to COURSE OBJECTIVES the vast bulge of the literature on the causes of war and condition of peace. We pay primary attention to the theory and empirical research in the political science and international relations. We study the leading 1 theories, key concepts, causal variables and the processes instigating war or leading to peace; investigate the circumstances under which the outcomes differ or are very much alike. The major focus of the course is o the theories of interstate war, though it is designed to undertake an overview of the literature on civil war, insurgency, terrorism, and various types of communal violence and conflict cycles. We also give considerable attention to the methodology (qualitative/quantitative; small-N/large-N, Case Study, etc.) utilized in the well- known works of the leading scholars of the field and methodological questions pertaining to epistemology and research design.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook
    Department of Political Science __________________________________________________________ PhD in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook Contents Pages 2-3: Examination Overview and General Directions Pages 4-10: Reading Lists Page 4- Methodology Page 5- American Government Page 6- Comparative Politics Page 7- International Relations Page 9- Public Policy Page 11-13: Sample Questions for Written Examination Page 11- Methodology Page 12- American Government Page 12- Comparative Politics Page 12- International Relations Page 13- Public Policy EXAMINATION OVERVIEW AND GENERAL DIRECTIONS Doctoral students sit For the comprehensive examination at the conclusion of all required coursework, or during their last semester of coursework. Students will ideally take their exams during the fifth semester in the program, but no later than their sixth semester. Advanced Entry students are strongly encouraged to take their exams during their Fourth semester, but no later than their FiFth semester. The comprehensive examination is a written exam based on the literature and research in the relevant Field of study and on the student’s completed coursework in that field. Petitioning to Sit for the Examination Your First step is to petition to participate in the examination. Use the Department’s graduate petition form and include the following information: 1) general statement of intent to sit For a comprehensive examination, 2) proposed primary and secondary Fields areas (see below), and 3) a list or table listing all graduate courses completed along with the Faculty instructor For the course and the grade earned This petition should be completed early in the registration period For when the student plans to sit For the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Group Representation Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide Mona Lena Krook and Diana Z
    The Politics of Group Representation Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide Mona Lena Krook and Diana Z. O’Brien In recent years a growing number of countries have established quotas to increase the representation of women and minorities in electoral politics. Policies for women exist in more than one hundred countries. Individual political parties have adopted many of these provisions, but more than half involve legal or constitutional reforms requiring that all parties select a certain proportion of female candidates.1 Policies for minorities are present in more than thirty countries.2 These measures typically set aside seats that other groups are ineligible to contest. Despite parallels in their forms and goals, empirical studies on quotas for each group have developed largely in iso- lation from one another. The absence of comparative analysis is striking, given that many normative arguments address women and minorities together. Further, scholars often generalize from the experiences of one group to make claims about the other. The intuition behind these analogies is that women and minorities have been similarly excluded based on ascriptive characteristics like sex and ethnicity. Concerned that these dynamics undermine basic democratic values of inclusion, many argue that the participation of these groups should be actively promoted as a means to reverse these historical trends. This article examines these assumptions to explore their leverage in explaining the quota policies implemented in national parliaments around the world. It begins by out- lining three normative arguments to justify such measures, which are transformed into three hypotheses for empirical investigation: (1) both women and minorities will re- ceive representational guarantees, (2) women or minorities will receive guarantees, and (3) women will receive guarantees in some countries, while minorities will receive them in others.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Representation Author(S): Jane Mansbridge Source: the American Political Science Review, Vol
    Rethinking Representation Author(s): Jane Mansbridge Source: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), pp. 515-528 Published by: American Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593021 . Accessed: 16/08/2013 04:49 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Political Science Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 88.119.17.198 on Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:49:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions American Political Science Review Vol. 97, No. 4 November 2003 Rethinking Representation JANE MANSBRIDGE Harvard University long withthe traditional"promissory" form of representation,empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here "anticipatory,""gyroscopic," and "surrogate" representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative.
    [Show full text]
  • Must War Find a Way?167
    Richard K. Betts A Review Essay Stephen Van Evera, Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conict Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999 War is like love, it always nds a way. —Bertolt Brecht, Mother Courage tephen Van Evera’s book revises half of a fteen-year-old dissertation that must be among the most cited in history. This volume is a major entry in academic security studies, and for some time it will stand beside only a few other modern works on causes of war that aspiring international relations theorists are expected to digest. Given that political science syllabi seldom assign works more than a generation old, it is even possible that for a while this book may edge ahead of the more general modern classics on the subject such as E.H. Carr’s masterful polemic, 1 The Twenty Years’ Crisis, and Kenneth Waltz’s Man, the State, and War. Richard K. Betts is Leo A. Shifrin Professor of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University, Director of National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, and editor of Conict after the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace (New York: Longman, 1994). For comments on a previous draft the author thanks Stephen Biddle, Robert Jervis, and Jack Snyder. 1. E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 2d ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1946); and Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959). See also Waltz’s more general work, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979); and Hans J.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work | Marijke Breuning, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, Announcing Science & Politics Political Michael Widmeier Why, and How, to Bridge the “Gap” Before Tenure: Peer-Reviewed Research May Not Be the Only Strategic Move as a Graduate Student or Young Scholar Mariano E. Bertucci Partisan Politics and Congressional Election Prospects: Political Science & Politics Evidence from the Iowa Electronic Markets Depression PSOCTOBER 2015, VOLUME 48, NUMBER 4 Joyce E. Berg, Christopher E. Peneny, and Thomas A. Rietz dep1 dep2 dep3 dep4 dep5 dep6 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Bayesian Analysis Trace Histogram −.002 500 −.004 400 −.006 300 −.008 200 100 −.01 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 0 Iteration number −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Autocorrelation Density 0.80 500 all 0.60 1−half 400 2−half 0.40 300 0.20 200 0.00 100 0 10 20 30 40 0 Lag −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Here are some of the new features: » Bayesian analysis » IRT (item response theory) » Multilevel models for survey data » Panel-data survival models » Markov-switching models » SEM: survey data, Satorra–Bentler, survival models » Regression models for fractional data » Censored Poisson regression » Endogenous treatment effects » Unicode stata.com/psp-14 Stata is a registered trademark of StataCorp LP, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA. OCTOBER 2015 Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/psc APSA Task Force Reports AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Let’s Be Heard! How to Better Communicate Political Science’s Public Value The APSA task force reports seek John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Cold War a Security Dilemma?
    Was the Cold War a Security Dilemma? Robert Jervis xploring whether the Cold War was a security dilemma illumi- nates botEh history and theoretical concepts. The core argument of the security dilemma is that, in the absence of a supranational authority that can enforce binding agreements, many of the steps pursued by states to bolster their secu- rity have the effect—often unintended and unforeseen—of making other states less secure. The anarchic nature of the international system imposes constraints on states’ behavior. Even if they can be certain that the current in- tentions of other states are benign, they can neither neglect the possibility that the others will become aggressive in the future nor credibly guarantee that they themselves will remain peaceful. But as each state seeks to be able to pro- tect itself, it is likely to gain the ability to menace others. When confronted by this seeming threat, other states will react by acquiring arms and alliances of their own and will come to see the rst state as hostile. In this way, the inter- action between states generates strife rather than merely revealing or accentuat- ing con icts stemming from differences over goals. Although other motives such as greed, glory, and honor come into play, much of international politics is ultimately driven by fear. When the security dilemma is at work, interna- tional politics can be seen as tragic in the sense that states may desire—or at least be willing to settle for—mutual security, but their own behavior puts this very goal further from their reach.1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(S): David A
    The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(s): David A. Welch Source: International Security , Fall, 1992, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Fall, 1992), pp. 112-146 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security This content downloaded from 209.6.197.28 on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:39:26 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Organizational David A. Welch Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms Retrospect and Prospect 1991 marked the twentieth anniversary of the publication of Graham Allison's Essence of De- cision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. ' The influence of this work has been felt far beyond the study of international politics. Since 1971, it has been cited in over 1,100 articles in journals listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index, in every periodical touching political science, and in others as diverse as The American Journal of Agricultural Economics and The Journal of Nursing Adminis- tration.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pj296m6 Author Hallock, Emily Rachel Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 © Copyright by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation by Emily Rachel Hallock Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Carole Pateman, Chair No defense of the liberal-democratic state can do without political obligation, yet existing theories cannot provide a successful account of political obligation. Existing accounts of obligation cannot parry critiques from rival theories, nor refute philosophical anarchists’ formidable attack on obligation. To move discussion of obligation forward, this dissertation offers an alternative solution to what George Klosko has called the ‘voluntarist paradox’ of liberal-democratic political obligation. While liberal ideas about the individual require that any obligation to obey be assumed through a voluntary act, individuals do not voluntarily assume obligations frequently enough to support legitimacy claims. In response to this paradox, most scholars deploy non-voluntary justifications for a general obligation to obey, while philosophical anarchists deny that such an obligation exists at all. In contrast, I argue that overcoming the voluntarist paradox requires a radically different view of the aims and scope of political obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of International Politics
    Theory of International Politics KENNETH N. WALTZ University of Califo rnia, Berkeley .A yy Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts Menlo Park, California London • Amsterdam Don Mills, Ontario • Sydney Preface This book is in the Addison-Wesley Series in Political Science Theory is fundamental to science, and theories are rooted in ideas. The National Science Foundation was willing to bet on an idea before it could be well explained. The following pages, I hope, justify the Foundation's judgment. Other institu­ tions helped me along the endless road to theory. In recent years the Institute of International Studies and the Committee on Research at the University of Califor­ nia, Berkeley, helped finance my work, as the Center for International Affairs at Harvard did earlier. Fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and from the Institute for the Study of World Politics enabled me to complete a draft of the manuscript and also to relate problems of international-political theory to wider issues in the philosophy of science. For the latter purpose, the philosophy depart­ ment of the London School of Economics provided an exciting and friendly envi­ ronment. Robert Jervis and John Ruggie read my next-to-last draft with care and in­ sight that would amaze anyone unacquainted with their critical talents. Robert Art and Glenn Snyder also made telling comments. John Cavanagh collected quantities of preliminary data; Stephen Peterson constructed the TabJes found in the Appendix; Harry Hanson compiled the bibliography, and Nacline Zelinski expertly coped with an unrelenting flow of tapes. Through many discussions, mainly with my wife and with graduate students at Brandeis and Berkeley, a number of the points I make were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Democracy This Page Intentionally Left Blank PATTERNS of DEMOCRACY
    Patterns of Democracy This page intentionally left blank PATTERNS OF DEMOCRACY Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries SECOND EDITION AREND LIJPHART First edition 1999. Second edition 2012. Copyright © 1999, 2012 by Arend Lijphart. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the US Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (US offi ce) or [email protected] (UK offi ce). Set in Melior type by Integrated Publishing Solutions, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries / Arend Lijphart. — 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-17202-7 (paperbound : alk. paper) 1. Democracy. 2. Comparative government. I. Title. JC421.L542 2012 320.3—dc23 2012000704 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 for Gisela and for our grandchildren, Connor, Aidan, Arel, Caio, Senta, and Dorian, in the hope that the twenty-fi rst century—their century—will yet become more
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Science Review
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW AMERICAN https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000060 . POLITICAL SCIENCE https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms REVIEW , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at 08 Oct 2021 at 13:45:36 , on May 2018, Volume 112, Issue 2 112, Volume May 2018, University of Athens . May 2018 Volume 112, Issue 2 Cambridge Core For further information about this journal https://www.cambridge.org/core ISSN: 0003-0554 please go to the journal website at: cambridge.org/apsr Downloaded from 00030554_112-2.indd 1 21/03/18 7:36 AM LEAD EDITOR Jennifer Gandhi Andreas Schedler Thomas König Emory University Centro de Investigación y Docencia University of Mannheim, Germany Claudine Gay Económicas, Mexico Harvard University Frank Schimmelfennig ASSOCIATE EDITORS John Gerring ETH Zürich, Switzerland Kenneth Benoit University of Texas, Austin Carsten Q. Schneider London School of Economics Sona N. Golder Central European University, and Political Science Pennsylvania State University Budapest, Hungary Thomas Bräuninger Ruth W. Grant Sanjay Seth University of Mannheim Duke University Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Sabine Carey Julia Gray Carl K. Y. Shaw University of Mannheim University of Pennsylvania Academia Sinica, Taiwan Leigh Jenco Mary Alice Haddad Betsy Sinclair London School of Economics Wesleyan University Washington University in St. Louis and Political Science Peter A. Hall Beth A. Simmons Benjamin Lauderdale Harvard University University of Pennsylvania London School of Economics Mary Hawkesworth Dan Slater and Political Science Rutgers University University of Chicago Ingo Rohlfi ng Gretchen Helmke Rune Slothuus University of Cologne University of Rochester Aarhus University, Denmark D.
    [Show full text]