APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 10, 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 10, 2014 APSA Contributors AS OF NOVEMBER 10, 2014 This list celebrates the generous contributions of our members in Jacobson Paul Allen Beck giving to one or more of the following programs from 1996 through 2014: APSA awards, programs, the Congressional Fellowship Pro- Cynthia McClintock John F. Bibby gram, and the Centennial Campaign. APSA thanks these donors for Ruth P. Morgan Amy B. Bridges ensuring that the benefi ts of membership and the infl uence of the Norman J. Ornstein Michael A. Brintnall profession will extend far into the future. APSA will update and print T.J. Pempel David S. Broder this list annually in the January issue of PS. Dianne M. Pinderhughes Charles S. Bullock III Jewel L. Prestage Margaret Cawley CENTENNIAL CIRCLE Offi ce of the President Lucian W. Pye Philip E. Converse ($25,000+) Policy Studies Organization J. Austin Ranney William J. Daniels Walter E. Beach Robert D. Putnam Ben F. Reeves Christopher J. Deering Doris A. Graber Ronald J Schmidt, Sr. Paul J. Rich Jorge I. Dominguez Pendleton Herring Smith College David B. Robertson Marion E. Doro Chun-tu Hsueh Endowment Janet D. Steiger for International Scholars Catherine E. Rudder Melvin J. Dubnick and Huang Hsing Kay Lehman Schlozman Eastern Michigan University Foundation FOUNDER’S CIRCLE ($5,000+) Eric J. Scott Leon D. Epstein Arend Lijphart Tony Affi gne J. Merrill Shanks Kathleen A. Frankovic Elinor Ostrom Barbara B. Bardes Lee Sigelman John Armando Garcia Beryl A. Radin Lucius J. Barker Howard J. Silver George J. Graham Leo A. Shifrin Robert H. Bates William O. Slayman Virginia H. Gray Frank J. Sorauf Susan C. Bourque Rogers M. Smith Joel B. Grossman Paul A. Volcker David W. Brady Paul M. Sniderman Charles D. Hadley University of Louisville John G. Bretting Mary E. Stuckey Harold D. Lasswell Society 1903 CIRCLE Robert F. Durant University of New Mexico H.D. Smith Foundation ($15,000+) Luis Ricardo Fraga Charles V. Walker John P. Harrod Richard F. Fenno James L. Gibson Kenneth N. Waltz Robert J-P. Hauck Jo Freeman Betty Glad James Q. Wilson Mary Hawkesworth Robert O. Keohane John Mark Hansen Thomas R. Wolanin Mary A. Hepburn Robert Merry Martin O. Heisler Yale University, The Matthew Holden, Jr. Norman H. Nie Jennifer L. Hochschild and MacMillan Center and Anne H. Hopkins C. Anthony Broh Department of Political Jack W. Peltason Robert Huckfeldt Robert A. Horn Science Pi Sigma Alpha Karen M. Hult Samuel P. Huntington Nancy H. Zingale Nancy Waclawek Patricia W. Ingraham Gary C. Jacobson Stephen L. Wasby BUILDER’S CIRCLE M. Kent Jennings Malcolm E. Jewell and Sarah University of Iowa, Offi ce of ($2,500+) Robert Jervis M. Morehouse the Provost Anonymous Loch K. Johnson Bryan D. Jones Alan I. Abramowitz Charles O. Jones 2003 CIRCLE Joyce K. Kallgren ($10,000+) Mary Fainsod Katzenstein and David Adamany William J. Keefe Roger H. Davidson Peter J. Katzenstein Gabriel A. Almond Herbert Kitschelt Heinz Eulau Ira Katznelson Eugene J. Alpert Allan Kornberg Ruth S. Jones and Warren E. Margaret Levi James E. Anderson Kay Lawson Miller Sydnee Guyer Lipset Gary J. Andres Avery Leiserson Martha Joynt Kumar Theodore J. Lowi Patricia Artinian Burdett A. Loomis Dale Rogers Marshall Jane Mansbridge Manuel Avalos Susan A. MacManus Kenneth J. Meier Valerie J. Martinez-Ebers William I. Bacchus David B. Magleby Northwestern University, Paula D. McClain and Paul Michael A. Baer Thomas E. Mann ©American Political Science Association, 2015 PS • January 2015 253 APSA Contributors David R. Mares Brandon Walton Bruce E. Caswell Kim Quaile Hill Joel Margolis Paul J. Weber Leonard Champney Milton E. Hill David R. Mayhew Susan Welch Eugene Y. S. Chang John F. Hoadley Daniel A. Mazmanian Lois R. Wise Daniel S. Cheever Ole R. Holsti Dorothy E. McBride Women’s Caucus for Political Richard Cheney J. Woodford Howard, Jr. Eileen McDonagh Science Clarke E. Cochran Robert J. Huckshorn Lorraine M. McDonnell Maurice C. Woodard Louise K. Comfort William E. Hudson Nancy R. McWilliams M. Margaret Conway Robert P. Huefner SECOND CENTURY Melissa R. Michelson Martha Crenshaw Vincent L. Hutchings SOCIETY Jeff rey R. Miller ($1,000+) Thomas E. Cronin Dennis S. Ippolito Juan March Institute Martha A. Ackelsberg Milton C. Cummings, Jr. John Ishiyama Julie L. Novkov John H. Aldrich Robert A. Dahl Kenneth Janda Karen O’Connor Herbert E. Alexander Vincent Davis James Jennings David Scott Palmer Hayward R. Alker Michael C. Dawson Bruce W. Jentleson Leonard Parkinson American Review of Public Richard E. DeLeon Calvin C. Jillson Carole Pateman Administration Patrick J. Deneen Nolan E. Jones Desiree S. Pedescleaux Herbert B. Asher Louis DeSipio Mark P. Jones Gerald M. Pomper David Austen-Smith Christine Di Stefano Michael A. Jones-Correa Mary Cornelia Porter Judith A. Baer Lawrence C. Dodd Jane Y. Junn James J. Prestage Lee Ann Banaszak Delmer D. Dunn Melvin A. Kahn George H. Quester Maryann Barakso Thomas R. Dye Nancy Kassop Randall B. Ripley Samuel H. Barnes George C. Edwards III Stanley Kelley, Jr. Ronald L. Rogowski Larry M. Bartels Cynthia Enloe Rita Mae Kelly Alan Rosenthal Harold F. Bass Maria J. Falco Samuel Krislov Mildred A. Schwartz Pamela Bataillon Morris Paul Fiorina Janet M. Laible Gary M. Segura Frank R. Baumgartner Lynne E. Ford Thomas P. Lauth Roberta S. Sigel Samuel H. Beer Jane E. Fountain Janise Lazarte Barbara Sinclair Seth B. Benjamin Linda L. Fowler David L. Leal John D. Sprague Jeff rey M. Berry George Frederickson Frances E. Lee Harvey Starr Henry S. Bienen William E. Frenzel David C. Leege Joseph Stewart, Jr. James W. Bjorkman Jerry Warden Friedheim Gregory B. Lewis Judith H. Stiehm Boston University Beth C. Fuchs Seymour Martin Lipset James A. Stimson Christopher Bosso Jurg Martin Gabriel Gerhard Loewenberg Camilla M. Stivers Janet M. Box-Steff ensmeier F. Chris Garcia, Ph.D. Linda Lopez Clarence N. Stone Richard W. Boyd Lisa Garcia Bedolla Nancy Sue Love Jonathan R. Strand John Brademas Louis C. Gawthrop Arthur Lupia James A. Thurber Henry E. Brady Irwin N. Gertzog L. Sandy Maisel Sue Tolleson-Rinehart Steven J. Brams Samuel K. Gove Melanie Frances Manion Toni-Michelle Travis Richard A. Brody Glen A. Halva-Neubauer Sheilah Mann David B. Truman Mitchell Brown Susan Webb Hammond Benjamin Marquez University of California, Nancy E. Brune Roderick P. Hart Janet M. Martin Los Angeles Frances Burke The Haworth Press, Inc. Alison Rios Millett University of Oslo James MacGregor Burns Kerry L. Haynie McCartney University of Texas, Austin California Community Jeff rey R. Henig Karen M. McCurdy Sidney Verba Foundation C. Randall Henning Richard L. Merritt John C. Wahlke Elizabeth Capell Rodney E. Hero Warren E. Miller Charles E. Walker Lief H. Carter Paul S. Herrnson William Mishler Walnut Foundation Gretchen G. Casper Donald V. Hester Charles L. Mitchell 254 PS • January 2015 ©American Political Science Association, 2015 APSA Contributors Robert Montjoy Sybil L. Stokes ANNIVERSARY SOCIETY Christopher H. Foreman, Jr. Christopher Z. Mooney Gerald H. Stollman ($500+) Jeff ry A. Frieden Lois B. Moreland Deborah Stone Gabriele Abels Kent Gardner James A. Morone Floyd E. Stoner Joel D. Aberbach Michael Garrety Richard G. Niemi Michael W. Suleiman Janet Lee Abrahm John B. Gates Helmut Norpoth James L. Sundquist Yvette M. Alex-Assensoh Harvey Glickman John S. Odell Sidney Tarrow Kristi Andersen Miriam A. Golden Marion Orr Raymond Tatalovich Lisa Anderson Marissa Martino Golden Kenneth T. Palmer Elizabeth Theiss-Morse Christopher J. Anderson Judith Lynn Goldstein Glenn R. Parker Dennis F. Thompson John W. Anderson Kenneth Goldstein William D. Pederson Joan C. Tronto Robert Axelrod Robert T. Golembiewski Lisa Baldez Mark A. Peterson George Tsebelis Leonard E. Goodall Lewis Bateman Nelson W. Polsby University of California, Charles W. Gossett Lynda W. Powell Los Angeles Lawrence Baum Robert C. Grady Henry J. Pratt University of Houston John C. Berg Fred I. Greenstein Barbara A. Presnall University of New Orleans Frances Stokes Berry Jose Angel Gutierrez Michael B. Preston University of Wisconsin, Gayle Binion Henry E. Hale Kenneth Prewitt Milwaukee Janet K. Boles Melinda Gann Hall David E. Price Arturo Vega Henry J. Bowers Susan B. Hansen Philip L. Pritchett David Vogel M. Kenneth Bowler Carol Hardy-Fanta Adam Przeworski Kenneth Vogel Ann O’M. Bowman William A. Hazleton Nicol C. Rae Charles E. Walcott Karlyn Bowman Lenneal J. Henderson Lyn Ragsdale Kenneth D. Wald Stanley C. Brubaker Virginia S. Herring Thomas F. Remington Robert S. Wallerstein Carol Buckland Marjorie R. Hershey Chester D. Rhoan Richard D. Warden Emmett H. Buell, Jr. John R. Hibbing Leroy N. Rieselbach Lionel Washington Bruce J. Bueno de Mesquita Kim Hildred Bert A. Rockman Kenneth Weakley Nancy Burns John W. Holcombe Richard Rose Herbert F. Weisberg Gerard Patrick Bushell Xiaobo Hu Loren D. Ross S. Laurel Weldon Michael P. Canning Evelyne Huber Donald Rothchild Jennifer Widner David A. Caputo Juan Carlos Huerta Larry J. Sabato Clyde Wilcox Jason P. Casellas Patricia A. Hurley Scott D. Sagan Melissa S. Williams Janet M. Clark Wallace E. Hutton Mark Q. Sawyer David M. Wilson Susan E. Clarke Tomoaki Iwai Thomas S. Schrock Graham K. Wilson David Collier Lawrence R. Jacobs Peregrine Schwartz-Shea Raymond E. Wolfi nger Joseph Cooper Harold K. Jacobson Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott Women’s Caucus for Political Gary W. Cox Amaney Jamal Sally Coleman Selden Science: West Charles Jeremy Curtoys W. Landis Jones Donna E. Shalala Robert C. Wood Nancy Davidson Peter H. Juviler W. Phillips Shively Deil S. Wright George Tinsley Davies Miles Kahler Christine Marie Sierra Dali L. Yang Rodolfo O. de la Garza Max M. Kampelman Dick W. Simpson Martynas A. Ycas Michelle D. Deardorff Karen M. Kaufmann Theda Skocpol James Sterling Young Linda C. Degutis Margaret E. Keck Anne-Marie Slaughter James V. Young Brendan J. Doherty Sean Q Kelly Elliot E.
Recommended publications
  • The Graduation Exercises Will Be Official
    TheMONDAY, Graduation MAY THE EIGHTEENTH Exercises TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN NINE O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING THOMAS K. HEARN, JR. PLAZA THE CARILLON: “Mediation from Thaïs” . Jules Massenet Raymond Ebert (’60), University Carillonneur William Stuart Donovan (’15), Student Carillonneur THE PROCESSIONAL . Led by Head Faculty Marshals THE OPENING OF COMMENCEMENT . Nathan O . Hatch President THE PRAYER OF INVOCATION . The Reverend Timothy L . Auman University Chaplain REMARKS TO THE GRADUATES . President Hatch THE CONFERRING OF HONORARY DEGREES . Rogan T . Kersh Provost Carlos Brito, Doctor of Laws Sponsor: Charles L . Iacovou, Dean, School of Business Stephen T . Colbert, Doctor of Humane Letters Sponsor: Michele K . Gillespie, Dean-Designate, Wake Forest College George E . Thibault, Doctor of Science Sponsor: Peter R . Lichstein, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine Jonathan L . Walton, Doctor of Divinity Sponsor: Gail R . O'Day, Dean, School of Divinity COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS . Stephen Colbert Comedian and Late Night Television Host THE HONORING OF RETIRING FACULTY FROM THE REYNOLDA CAMPUS Bobbie L . Collins, M .S .L .S ., Librarian Ronald V . Dimock, Jr ., Ph .D ., Thurman D. Kitchin Professor of Biology Jack D . Ferner, M .B .A ., Lecturer of Management J . Kendall Middaugh, II, Ph .D ., Associate Professor of Management James T . Powell, Ph .D ., Associate Professor of Classical Languages David P . Weinstein, Ph .D ., Professor of Politics and International Affairs FROM THE MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS James D . Ball, M .D ., Professor Emeritus of Radiology William R . Brown, Ph .D ., Professor Emeritus of Radiology Frank S . Celestino, M .D ., Professor Emeritus of Family and Community Medicine Wesley Covitz, M .D ., Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics Robert L .
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World
    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Group Representation Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide Mona Lena Krook and Diana Z
    The Politics of Group Representation Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide Mona Lena Krook and Diana Z. O’Brien In recent years a growing number of countries have established quotas to increase the representation of women and minorities in electoral politics. Policies for women exist in more than one hundred countries. Individual political parties have adopted many of these provisions, but more than half involve legal or constitutional reforms requiring that all parties select a certain proportion of female candidates.1 Policies for minorities are present in more than thirty countries.2 These measures typically set aside seats that other groups are ineligible to contest. Despite parallels in their forms and goals, empirical studies on quotas for each group have developed largely in iso- lation from one another. The absence of comparative analysis is striking, given that many normative arguments address women and minorities together. Further, scholars often generalize from the experiences of one group to make claims about the other. The intuition behind these analogies is that women and minorities have been similarly excluded based on ascriptive characteristics like sex and ethnicity. Concerned that these dynamics undermine basic democratic values of inclusion, many argue that the participation of these groups should be actively promoted as a means to reverse these historical trends. This article examines these assumptions to explore their leverage in explaining the quota policies implemented in national parliaments around the world. It begins by out- lining three normative arguments to justify such measures, which are transformed into three hypotheses for empirical investigation: (1) both women and minorities will re- ceive representational guarantees, (2) women or minorities will receive guarantees, and (3) women will receive guarantees in some countries, while minorities will receive them in others.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Representation Author(S): Jane Mansbridge Source: the American Political Science Review, Vol
    Rethinking Representation Author(s): Jane Mansbridge Source: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), pp. 515-528 Published by: American Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593021 . Accessed: 16/08/2013 04:49 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Political Science Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 88.119.17.198 on Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:49:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions American Political Science Review Vol. 97, No. 4 November 2003 Rethinking Representation JANE MANSBRIDGE Harvard University long withthe traditional"promissory" form of representation,empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here "anticipatory,""gyroscopic," and "surrogate" representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 May 20.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Monday 20 May 2013 10 Rajab 1434 - Volume 18 Number 5705 Price: QR2 Msheireb Broad bowls Properties awards England to QR2.5bn deal emphatic victory Business | 18 Sport | 28 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Emir meets Indian minister Emir to open Several farms 13th Doha Forum today being used for DOHA: The Emir H H Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani will open the 13th Doha Forum today in presence of a number other purposes of heads of state and dignitaries. The Prime Minister and Foreign Minister H E Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem bin Jabor Al Misuse of government land Thani will also speak during the opening session, giving Qatar’s DOHA: Many agricultural to make more profits owners perspective on current challenges farms in the country for which might be using some for other in international relations. the government provided land purposes. The forum will discuss the on long-lease at a nominal rent, The violating farms were given impact of emerging world order are being misused by their own- six months’ grace period to mend in the Arab world and challenges ers for other purposes in viola- their ways or face the music facing new democracies in the tion of the law. and the deadline ends later this Middle East. It will look at the Some farmhouses have become month. current status for development hideouts of runaway workers, The daily said it found it amaz- amid the ongoing economic crisis while automobile workshops have ing that some farms were being and the impact on human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • John J. Mearsheimer: an Offensive Realist Between Geopolitics and Power
    John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power Peter Toft Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Østerfarimagsgade 5, DK 1019 Copenhagen K, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] With a number of controversial publications behind him and not least his book, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, John J. Mearsheimer has firmly established himself as one of the leading contributors to the realist tradition in the study of international relations since Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Politics. Mearsheimer’s main innovation is his theory of ‘offensive realism’ that seeks to re-formulate Kenneth Waltz’s structural realist theory to explain from a struc- tural point of departure the sheer amount of international aggression, which may be hard to reconcile with Waltz’s more defensive realism. In this article, I focus on whether Mearsheimer succeeds in this endeavour. I argue that, despite certain weaknesses, Mearsheimer’s theoretical and empirical work represents an important addition to Waltz’s theory. Mearsheimer’s workis remarkablyclear and consistent and provides compelling answers to why, tragically, aggressive state strategies are a rational answer to life in the international system. Furthermore, Mearsheimer makes important additions to structural alliance theory and offers new important insights into the role of power and geography in world politics. Journal of International Relations and Development (2005) 8, 381–408. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800065 Keywords: great power politics; international security; John J. Mearsheimer; offensive realism; realism; security studies Introduction Dangerous security competition will inevitably re-emerge in post-Cold War Europe and Asia.1 International institutions cannot produce peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work | Marijke Breuning, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, Announcing Science & Politics Political Michael Widmeier Why, and How, to Bridge the “Gap” Before Tenure: Peer-Reviewed Research May Not Be the Only Strategic Move as a Graduate Student or Young Scholar Mariano E. Bertucci Partisan Politics and Congressional Election Prospects: Political Science & Politics Evidence from the Iowa Electronic Markets Depression PSOCTOBER 2015, VOLUME 48, NUMBER 4 Joyce E. Berg, Christopher E. Peneny, and Thomas A. Rietz dep1 dep2 dep3 dep4 dep5 dep6 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Bayesian Analysis Trace Histogram −.002 500 −.004 400 −.006 300 −.008 200 100 −.01 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 0 Iteration number −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Autocorrelation Density 0.80 500 all 0.60 1−half 400 2−half 0.40 300 0.20 200 0.00 100 0 10 20 30 40 0 Lag −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Here are some of the new features: » Bayesian analysis » IRT (item response theory) » Multilevel models for survey data » Panel-data survival models » Markov-switching models » SEM: survey data, Satorra–Bentler, survival models » Regression models for fractional data » Censored Poisson regression » Endogenous treatment effects » Unicode stata.com/psp-14 Stata is a registered trademark of StataCorp LP, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA. OCTOBER 2015 Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/psc APSA Task Force Reports AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Let’s Be Heard! How to Better Communicate Political Science’s Public Value The APSA task force reports seek John H.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pj296m6 Author Hallock, Emily Rachel Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 © Copyright by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation by Emily Rachel Hallock Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Carole Pateman, Chair No defense of the liberal-democratic state can do without political obligation, yet existing theories cannot provide a successful account of political obligation. Existing accounts of obligation cannot parry critiques from rival theories, nor refute philosophical anarchists’ formidable attack on obligation. To move discussion of obligation forward, this dissertation offers an alternative solution to what George Klosko has called the ‘voluntarist paradox’ of liberal-democratic political obligation. While liberal ideas about the individual require that any obligation to obey be assumed through a voluntary act, individuals do not voluntarily assume obligations frequently enough to support legitimacy claims. In response to this paradox, most scholars deploy non-voluntary justifications for a general obligation to obey, while philosophical anarchists deny that such an obligation exists at all. In contrast, I argue that overcoming the voluntarist paradox requires a radically different view of the aims and scope of political obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science
    A 364547 Political Science: THE STATE OF -THEDISCIPLINE Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, editors Columbia University W. W. Norton & Company American Political Science Association NEW YORK | LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTENTS Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner Preface and Acknowledgments xiii Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner American Political Science: The Discipline's State and the State of the Discipline 1 The State in an Era of Globalization Margaret Levi The State of the Study of the State 3 3 Miles Kahler The State of the State in World Politics 56 Atul Kohli State, Society, and Development 84 Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions 118 I ]ames E. Alt Comparative Political Economy: Credibility, Accountability, and Institutions 147 ]ames D. Morrow International Conflict: Assessing the Democratic Peace and Offense-Defense Theory 172 Stephen M. Walt The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition 197 Democracy, Justice, and Their Institutions Ian Shapiro The State of Democratic Theory 235 vi | CONTENTS Jeremy Waldron Justice 266 Romand Coles Pluralization and Radical Democracy: Recent Developments in Critical Theory and Postmodernism 286 Gerald Gamm and ]ohn Huber Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress 313 Barbara Geddes The Great Transformation in the Study of Politics in Developing Countries 342 Kathleen Thelen The Political Economy of Business and Labor in the Developed Democracies 371 Citizenship, Identity, and Political Participation Seyla Benhabib Political Theory and Political Membership in a Changing World 404 Kay Lehman Schlozman Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care? 433 Nancy Burns - Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action 462 Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • With the Release of a ​New Television Ad​, the ​One-Year Anniversary Of
    Happy Monday! With the release of a new television ad, the one-year anniversary of Michael’s Ted Cruz ​ ​ ​ ​ takedown, the completion of our “Just The Truth” ad series, and new endorsements in New ​ ​ ​ Hampshire, Team Bennet has had a big week, and we can’t wait to fill you in! After hitting our New Hampshire Investment Strategy goal—thanks to your help!—Bennet for America launched a new television ad in New Hampshire to demonstrate why Michael is the best ​ candidate to beat Donald Trump and move the country forward. The ad — named “Two Weeks at a ​ Time” for Michael’s most viral tweet — makes clear why he is the opposite of Donald Trump: As ​ ​ ​ president, he’ll keep his head down and work hard so Americans can raise their families and live their lives. Please take a look and then share the ad far and wide! Last week, Michael picked up two new endorsements from prominent Granite Staters, New ​ ​ Hampshire State Representative and Assistant Majority Floor Leader Michael Cahill and Bow Selectman Harry Judd! This week, we also concluded our “Just The Truth” digital ad series, which we launched earlier ​ ​ ​ this month to share Michael’s personal story, experiences in leadership and service, and motivations underlying his run for president. Watch all 14 ads in the series here. ​ ​ The University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Budget Model last week released an estimate of ​ ​ Michael’s tax plan in The Real Deal, verifying the accuracy of its revenue estimates and further demonstrating that Michael’s plan is fully paid for.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition and Cooperation
    CONTRIBUTORS JAMES E. ALT is Frank G. Thomson Professor of Government and director of the Center of Basic Research in the Social Sciences at Harvard University. MARGARET LEVI is professor of political science and Harry Bridges Chair in Labor Studies, University of Washington, Seattle. She is also director of the University of Washington Center for Labor Studies. ELINOR OSTROM is codirector of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis and the Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environ- mental Change at Indiana University, Bloomington. She is also Arthur F. Bentley Professor of Political Science. KENNETH J. ARROW is Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus and profes- sor of Operations Research Emeritus at Stanford University. He is also director of the Stanford Center on Conflict and Negotiation. GARY S. BECKER is professor of economics and sociology at the University of Chicago. JAMES M. BUCHANAN is advisory general director of the Center for Study of Public Choice at George Mason University. NORMAN FROHLICH is professor of business administration at the University of Manitoba and senior researcher at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation. BARBARA GEDDES is associate professor of political science at the University of California at Los Angeles. ROBERT E. GOODIN is professor of philosophy in the Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. RUSSELL HARDIN is professor of politics at New York University. BRYAN D. JONES is professor of political science at the University of Washington, Seattle. ROBERT O. KEOHANE is James B. Duke Professor of Political Science at Duke University. xi xii Contributors DAVID D.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting the Epic of America
    One Rewriting the Epic of America IRA KATZNELSON “Is the traditional distinction between international relations and domes- tic politics dead?” Peter Gourevitch inquired at the start of his seminal 1978 article, “The Second Image Reversed.” His diagnosis—“perhaps”—was mo- tivated by the observation that while “we all understand that international politics and domestic structures affect each other,” the terms of trade across the domestic and international relations divide had been uneven: “reason- ing from international system to domestic structure” had been downplayed. Gourevitch’s review of the literature demonstrated that long-standing efforts by international relations scholars to trace the domestic roots of foreign pol- icy to the interplay of group interests, class dynamics, or national goals1 had not been matched by scholarship analyzing how domestic “structure itself derives from the exigencies of the international system.”2 Gourevitch counseled scholars to turn their attention to the international system as a cause as well as a consequence of domestic politics. He also cautioned that this reversal of the causal arrow must recognize that interna- tional forces exert pressures rather than determine outcomes. “The interna- tional system, be it in an economic or politico-military form, is underdeter- mining. The environment may exert strong pulls but short of actual occupation, some leeway in the response to that environment remains.”3 A decade later, Robert Putnam turned to two-level games to transcend the question as to “whether
    [Show full text]