Consultation and Correspondence

APPENDIX G Consultation and Correspondence

This Appendix includes correspondence and consultation associated with Naples Airport (APF) Part 150 Study. It includes details of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) meetings associated with the Part 150 Study. Documentation includes copies meeting agendas, presentation materials, and summaries. Details on the TAC meetings held throughout development of the Draft NEMs are included below.

 Appendix G-1 TAC Meeting #1 – January 30, 2020 o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-2 TAC Meeting #2 – June 23, 2020

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-3 TAC Meeting #3 – November 5, 2020

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-4 TAC Meeting #4 – April 13, 2021

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting The NCC was involved throughout the Part 150 Study process to brief members on any recent developments resulting from the Study. Agenda and presentation materials were prepared for each meeting. Details on the NCC meetings are included below.  Appendix G-5 NCC Meeting #1 – January 30, 2020 o Meeting Agenda

Naples Airport 1 Draft Noise Exposure Map Report

o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-6 NCC Meeting #2 – June 25, 2020

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-7 NCC Meeting #3 – October 29, 2020

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting o Meeting Summary  Appendix G-8 NCC Meeting #4 – January 28, 2021

o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting The NAA also met with other stakeholders, such as Naples City Council, to discuss developments within the Part 150 Study. Details on the meetings with the City of Naples and other stakeholders are included below.  Appendix G-9 Naples City Council Workshop – September 14, 2020 o Meeting Agenda o Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport 2 Draft Noise Exposure Map Report

Appendix G-1

TAC Meeting #1

January 30, 2020

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #1

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Airport Office Building 200 Aviation Drive North, 2nd Floor Naples, FL 34102

Thursday, January 30, 2020 1:00 p.m.

Committee Members Bruce Barone – Fifth Avenue South Business Improvement District Representative Phil Boyer – Piston Representative Jerry Brown – City at Large Representative Michael Dalby – Greater Naples Chamber Representative Danielle Hudson – Naples Area Board of Realtors Representative Steve Kingston – Jet Representative David Norgard – Southeast Representative Daniel O’Brien – Northwest Representative Andy Reed – County at Large Representative Jamie Robinson – Northeast Representative Craig Westbay – Southwest Representative

Liaisons/Participants Commissioner Donna M. Messer – Naples Airport Authority Liaison Vice Mayor Gary Price – Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Peter Green – Federal Aviation Administration Liaison Joe Molsen – TRACON/RSW Liaison Stacey Nichols – Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Liaison Robin Singer – City of Naples Planning Department Liaison Jamie French – Collier County Growth Management Division Liaison Executive Director – Christopher A. Rozansky Authority Attorney – William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Welcome. If you wish to address the Technical Advisory Committee regarding an item listed on the Agenda, please complete a Speaker Registration form (available at the rear of the room) and hand it to the ESA Representative prior to consideration of that item. We ask that speakers limit comments to 5 minutes and that large groups name a spokesperson whenever possible. All written, audio-visual, and other materials distributed to Committee members or staff during this meeting will become the property of NAA and will be a public record. Thank you for your interest and participation. Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting – Final Agenda January 30, 2020 Page 2

NOTICE

Formal action may be taken on any item listed on the Agenda below, or added to the Agenda before or during the meeting, or discussed during the meeting without being added to the Agenda. Also, the sequence of items may be changed as the meeting progresses. Any person who decides to appeal a recommendation made by the Technical Advisory Committee with respect to any matter considered at this meeting may do so at the next Regular City of Naples Airport Authority Board Meeting.

Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids or services in order to participate in this proceeding for meetings at the City Council Chamber may call the City Clerk’s Office at 213-1015, or for meetings at the Airport Office Building, the NAA Executive Assistant’s Office at 643-0733, with requests at least two business days before the meeting.

Information on Action Items and other items which has been provided in advance of this meeting may be inspected at the office of the Executive Assistant, General Aviation Terminal Building, 2nd Floor, 160 Aviation Drive North. Minutes of this meeting will be prepared for Committee approval, usually at the next Regular Meeting.

Actions of this committee are subject to the Florida Sunshine Law. Florida Statute 286.011 states, “any gathering, whether formal or casual, of two or more members of the same Board or commission to discuss some matter on which foreseeable action will be taken by the public Board or Commission must be conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law.”

A. ROLL CALL – ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (ESA)

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Purpose and Objectives of the Technical Advisory Committee – ESA

2. Government in the Sunshine – Bond, Schoeneck and King, PLLC

3. Part 150 Noise Study Overview - ESA

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

G. ACTION ITEMS

1. 2020 Meeting Schedule

H. OLD BUSINESS

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date

Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting – Final Agenda January 30, 2020 Page 3

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #1

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – January 30, 2020 Part 150 Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Agenda

• Welcome and Introductions • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Purpose and Objectives of the Technical Committee • TAC Charter and Participation Agreement • Role of the TAC Meeting Facilitator • Florida’s Sunshine Law • Airport Overview • Part 150 Study Overview • Introduction to Aircraft Noise, Modeling, and Compatibility • Project Schedule • Questions

1 Welcome and Introductions – Consultant Team

Environmental Science Associates Garth Solutions • 500+ person environmental consulting firm • 30+ person communications and management consulting firm • Experience at more than 150 airports nationally • Numerous marquis public and private sector • Highly complex projects projects including: • Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Part 150 • $2.3 billion Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport expansion program • LaGuardia Part 150 • Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Part 150 • John F. Kennedy International Part 150 • Broward Schools Capital Improvement SMART • Los Angeles International Part 150 Program • San Francisco International Part 150 • $4 billion Public-Private Partnership SoLe Mia Development project in the City of North Miami • Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Part 150 • Metlife Stadium • 100+ airport noise-related studies in Florida • Tropicana Field

Technical Advisory Committee

2 TAC Overview

• Naples Airport Authority (NAA) has formed a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the Part 150 Study for Naples Airport (APF)

• NAA has invited a cross section of key stakeholders to serve on the TAC

• The TAC is composed of members who are authorized to represent their organization and/or constituents for the duration of the APF Part 150 Study, which is estimated at two years

• TAC meetings will be conducted in a professional and respectful manner

• TAC meetings will be open to the public, subject to space availability

TAC Membership

• Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) • Naples Area Board of Realtors Liaison (NABOR) • NAA Liaison • 5th Avenue Business Improvement • Community Representatives District − NW, NE, SW and SE Quadrants • Naples Airport piston operator − At-Large City of Naples • Naples Airport jet operator − At-Large Collier County • Naples ATCT representative • City Planning Department • FAA RSW TRACON representative • County Growth Management Division • FAA Airports District Office (ADO) • Greater Naples Chamber

3 Purpose and Role of the TAC

• TAC members represent the interests of their organization and/or constituents

• The TAC’s role is to support the APF Part 150 Study

― Review study assumptions ― Provide technical feedback within the context of the Part 150 Study (noise exposure maps and noise compatibility program) ― TAC members are encouraged to express their opinions and expected to respect the range of opinions expressed by their fellow TAC members • TAC members are also expected to advise their organization and/or constituents of the TAC’s discussions

• NAA will respect and consider the TAC’s technical input, but retains responsibility for, and decision making authority on, the APF Part 150 Study

Role of the TAC Facilitator

• To ensure that the TAC meetings are effective they will be facilitated by a professional meeting facilitator

• The meeting facilitator is responsible for ensuring that the TAC meetings adhere to the published meeting agenda

• The meeting facilitator may extend or shorten the length of a discussion related to an agenda item at his or her sole discretion

• The meeting facilitator, or NAA, may cancel or suspend a TAC meeting due to disrespectful or disruptive behavior

4 Overview of Florida Sunshine Law

• The activities of the Technical Advisory Committee will be subject to the requirements of Florida Sunshine Law

• The Technical Advisory Committee will also be subject to public records law

Airport Overview

5 APF Overview

• APF began operating in 1943 as a military airfield and celebrated their 50th anniversary on July 3rd, 2019 • Fiscal Year 2019 the Airport had 112,800 operations • $8 million invested in noise abatement efforts since 2000 • The Airport is home to: − Flight Schools − Aircraft Charter and Sales − Air Ambulance − Corporate Aviation − Civil Air Patrol − Mosquito Control

APF Overview

• Runway 5-23 − 6,600’ long X 150’ wide − 800’ displaced thresholds at each runway end • Runway 14-32 − 5,000’ long X 100’ wide − 128’ displacement at RW 14 end − 450’ displacement at RW 32 end • SW-NE Turf Runway − 1,850’ long x 100’ wide • Contract Air Traffic Control Tower

6 Roles of Key Entities

Three core organizations are involved in aircraft operations at APF:

• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ― Directs the safe movement of aircraft in the air and on the ground

• NAA ― Manages the airport(s), improves and maintains airport facilities ― No control over where aircraft fly

• Pilots ― The pilot in command has ultimate responsibility for the safe operation of his/her aircraft

Part 150 Study Overview

7 Part 150 Study Overview

• Interim Rule on Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning issued in 1981 and finalized in 1985, later recodified as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150

• Issued in response to provisions contained in the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979

• Establishes the methodology to be followed when preparing aircraft noise exposure maps and developing airport/airport environs land use compatibility programs

• Part 150 studies are voluntary, but…

• Part 150 studies must adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 guidelines to be considered and accepted and approved by FAA

Part 150 History at APF

The 14 CFR Part 150 process is the Airport Sponsor’s mechanism to improve the compatibility between the Airport and surrounding communities

1978 1987 1997 2000 2010 First NAA NAA submits NAA submits NAA Submits documented completes Part 150 2000 and 2010 and publication first formal NEM and 2005 NEM 2015 NEM of noise noise NCP updates update to update to abatement study to FAA FAA FAA procedures

8 Goals and Objectives

Key Issues: • NAA has strong history of industry noise leadership but a desire to examine whether any additional reasonable noise mitigation strategies can be implemented • Jet activity has increased and will continue to grow • Training activity is on rebound • Seasonal variations are masked by DNL • Quiet Hours voluntary curfew compliance remains above 98% • APF noise exposure has generally decreased over time according to federal guidelines (14 CFR Part 150), but community concerns about aircraft noise continue

Goals and Objectives Opportunities • Brings stakeholders to the table • Education • Provides decision making structure • Can strengthen community relationships

Challenges • Seasonal variations in noise exposure are often not reflected in the DNL contours • Regulatory process limits what can be approved

9 Part 150 Study Overview

Regulatory Framework

• Federal law sets aircraft noise standards, prescribes operating rules, establishes the compatibility planning process, and limits airport proprietor’s ability to restrict aircraft operations. • State law sets forth compatibility planning guidelines and noise standards but aircraft are exempt. • Local noise ordinances set noise standards and provide for compatible land use planning but aircraft are exempt.

Part 150 Study Overview

Who Can Regulate Airport Noise?

• Federal Aviation Administration: (1) Controls aircraft while in flight (2) Responsible for controlling noise at its source (i.e., aircraft engines) (3) Certifies aircraft and pilots • Airport Proprietors/NAA: (1) Very limited authority to adopt local restrictions (2) Responsible for capital improvement projects and infrastructure • Local Governments and States: (1) Promote compatible land use through zoning (2) Require real estate disclosure (3) Mandate sound-insulating building materials

10 Part 150 Study Overview

Analyze, Evaluate, Educate

• Determine existing and future noise conditions in the vicinity of an airport

• Identify incompatible uses

• Identify measures to improve compatibility ― Evaluate the feasibility of possible flight procedure/land use changes ― Submit locally-endorsed recommendations to the FAA regarding noise reduction measures ― Approved measures may be eligible for Federal grant funding

• Educate communities on the Federal process and what can and cannot be done to address aircraft noise concerns

Part 150 Study Overview

Noise Exposure Map Report (NEM) • Develop a comprehensive database of current conditions • Noise contour development and impact analysis • Prepare and submit Noise Exposure Map (NEM) Report Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) • Identify and evaluate noise abatement alternatives • Identify and evaluate compatible land use alternatives • Identify and evaluate administrative measures • Prepare and submit Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Report Stakeholder Outreach Program • Local Jurisdictions/Agencies • FAA • Public

11 Part 150 Study Overview

(NEMs) (NCP)

Noise Modeling and Compatibility

12 Introduction to Aircraft Noise - DNL

Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)

• 24-hour time weighted energy average noise level based on A-weighted decibels (dBA)

• Noise occurring between 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. is penalized by 10 dB to account for the higher sensitivity to noise during nighttime hours and for the expected further decrease in background levels that typically occur in the nighttime

• FAA requires the use of DNL for airport noise assessments

• Average Annual Day aircraft noise exposure is calculated over a broad area and then depicted using contour lines of equal noise levels

Introduction to Aircraft Noise - DNL

13 Introduction to Aircraft Noise - DNL

Noise Modeling • Aircraft noise modeling allows: ― Calculation of noise exposure at any point ― Depicting annual average aircraft noise exposure ― Predicting future aircraft noise exposure ― Assessing changes in noise impacts resulting from runway configuration changes or new runways ― Assessing changes in fleet mix and/or number of operations ― Evaluating operational procedures

• Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) replaced the Integrated Noise Model (INM) when it was released in 2015. The current version, AEDT 2C, will be used for the APF Part 150 Study.

Part 150 Study Overview – Years of Analysis

Noise Exposure Maps – Baseline Conditions • Base year and a future year which is at least 5 years into the future • Basis of comparison for effectiveness of potential noise abatement measures • Year of submittal must be consistent with base year − Existing Condition: 2020/2021 − Future Condition: 2025/2026 • Existing Condition based on recent 12 months of operational data applied to 2020 projected activity level

14 Part 150 Study Overview – Modeling

Model Inputs • The Amount of Noise Exposure is determined by: Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) − Aircraft types Version 3B − Stage length − Number of average annual day operations − Nighttime weighting (1 nighttime operation = 10 daytime operations) • The Noise Exposure Distribution is determined by: − Runway configuration and use − Flight track locations − Flight track use • Other Factors − Meteorological Conditions

Part 150 Study Overview – Land Use Compatibility

Land Uses • Existing and Future Land Use • Land parcel data • Zoning • Jurisdictional boundaries and neighborhoods Noise Sensitives Uses • Residential • Places of worship • Schools, colleges and universities • Libraries/cultural institutions • Hospitals and residential healthcare facilities • Daycare and assisted living facilities • Historic properties

15 Part 150 Study Overview – Land Use Compatibility

Land Use Compatibility • Table 1 in Appendix A of 14 CFR Part 150 provides noise and land use compatibility guidelines • Deems levels below 65 dB DNL to be compatible with all land uses • Allows for the adoption of appropriate local land use standards for land use compatibility planning purposes

The City of Naples and Collier County have adopted the 60 DNL contour as the threshold of significance

Part 150 Study Overview – Sample Noise Exposure Map (NEM)

RSW

16 Part 150 Overview - FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions • Will the study “fix” all the noise issues around the airport? − No, overflights of residential areas are unavoidable and sensitivity to noise varies by person • What type of noise monitoring will be conducted? − None, all analysis is modeling based which allows consistency and evaluation of future conditions • Will the Study address concerns about safety, soot, or other concerns related to aircraft operation? − The Part 150 process focusses exclusively on noise and land use compatibility

Project Schedule

17 Kickoff Public Workshops

1 Baker Park Sugden-Gomez Center 100 Riverside Circle February 11, 2020 Naples FL 34102 2 5:00 – 7:00 pm

2 Moorings Presbyterian Church 791 Harbour Drive February 12, 2020 Naples, FL 34103 9:30 – 11:30 am 1 3 3 Lorenzo Walker Technical School 3702 Estey Avenue February 12, 2020 Naples, FL 34104 6:00 - 8:00 pm

18 Future Meetings

Technical Advisory Committee

• TAC Meeting #2 (Tentative) April 23, 2020

• TAC Meeting #3 (Tentative) November 5, 2020

• Reminder notices will be sent out in advance of each meeting • All TAC Materials will be posted on the Project Website following the meeting

Public Website

Project Website (flynaples.com): • Project Information • Process • Study Elements • FAQ’s • Noise History PowerPoint • Public Draft and Final reports • Schedule • Newsletters (4) Communication and Feedback: • Upcoming meetings including location/dates/times • Receipt of comments specific to Part 150 Study • Links to other websites/resources

19 Questions?

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #1

Meeting Summary

Appendix G-2

TAC Meeting #2

June 23, 2020

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #2

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

Please note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the TAC meeting will be held via Zoom. The public is invited to join the webinar by registering in advance at the following link:

https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_udoBUZ7bTDmQj3HKWjH2Vw

In addition, if you wish to address the TAC, please select the option to speak on the registration form at the link above. We ask that speakers limit comments to 5 minutes.

AGENDA

Virtual Meeting at the Link Above Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9 a.m.

Committee Members Joan Tobin - Third Street South Business District Bruce Barone – Fifth Avenue South Business Improvement District Representative Phil Boyer – Piston Representative Jerry Brown – City at Large Representative Michael Dalby – Greater Naples Chamber Representative Danielle Hudson – Naples Area Board of Realtors Representative Steve Kingston – Jet Representative David Norgard – Southeast Representative Daniel O’Brien – Northwest Representative Andy Reed – County at Large Representative Jamie Robinson – Representative Raymond Stricklen – Southwest Representative

Liaisons/Participants Commissioner Donna M. Messer – Naples Airport Authority Liaison City Councilor Gary Price – Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Peter Green – Federal Aviation Administration Liaison Joe Molsen – TRACON/RSW Liaison Stacey Nichols – Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Liaison Robin Singer – City of Naples Planning Department Liaison Jamie French – Collier County Growth Management Division Liaison Executive Director – Christopher A. Rozansky Authority Attorney – William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting June 23, 2020 Page 2

Welcome. All written, audio-visual, and other materials distributed to Committee members or staff during this meeting will become the property of NAA and will be a public record. Thank you for your interest and participation.

NOTICE

Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids or services in order to participate in this proceeding for online meetings may call the NAA Executive Assistant’s Office at 643-0733, with requests at least two business days before the meeting.

A. ROLL CALL – ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (ESA)

1. Introduce New TAC Members

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

1. Approve January 30, 2020 Committee Minutes

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Overview of Public Workshop Comments and Themes - ESA

2. Naples Airport Noise History - ESA

3. Airspace Operational Overview - ESA

4. Noise Modeling, Operational Analysis and Land Use Compatibility - ESA

5. Alternative Community Outreach Strategies in the COVID-19 Environment - ESA

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting June 23, 2020 Page 3

G. ACTION ITEMS

H. OLD BUSINESS

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date – November 5, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #2

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – June 23rd 2020 Part 150 Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Draft for deliberation purposes only

Pledge Of Allegiance

Draft for deliberation purposes only

1 Presentation Materials Overview

• Summary of TAC #1 • Overview of Open Houses and Comment Themes • Naples Airport Noise History • Airspace Operational Overview • Noise Modeling, Operational Analysis, and Land Use Compatibility • Alternative Community Outreach Strategies in the COVID-19 Environment

Part 150 Studies Must Adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 Guidelines to be Accepted and Approved by FAA Draft for deliberation purposes only

Summary of TAC #1

Draft for deliberation purposes only

2 Summary of TAC #1

• Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) − Purpose and Objectives of the TAC − Role of the TAC Meeting Facilitator − TAC Charter and Participation Agreement − Florida’s Sunshine Law

• Airport Overview

• Part 150 Study Overview

• Introduction to Aircraft Noise, Modeling, and Compatibility

• Project Schedule

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Summary of TAC #1 - Part 150 Study Overview

Federally Regulated Process

• Determine existing and future noise conditions in the vicinity of an airport

• Identify incompatible uses

• Educate communities on the Federal process and what can and cannot be done to address aircraft noise concerns

Part 150 Studies Must Adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 Guidelines to be Accepted and Approved by FAA Draft for deliberation purposes only

3 Overview of Open Houses and Comments Received

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Open House Attendance

• NAA held three Open Houses in February to answer questions on the Part 150 Study and gather feedback from the Naples community on any airport noise-related concerns.

February 11, 2020 February 12, 2020 February 12, 2020 5-7 pm 9:30-11:30 am 6-8 pm

Baker Park Moorings Lorenzo Walker Sugden- Presbyterian Technical Gomez Center Church College

26 Attendees 11 Attendees 16 Attendees

Draft for deliberation purposes only

4 Overview of Open House Comments

Methodology • Attendees were encouraged to provide Comment Airport Curfew feedback and leave comments on noise-related issues. Aircraft Altitude

• The Open Houses resulted in comments from Aircraft Flight attendees that showed ten overarching themes: Paths Air Quality 1. Methodology 6. Airport Curfew Comment 7. Aircraft Flight Paths 2. Quality of Life Land use 8. Aircraft Altitude 3. Public Outreach 9. Air Quality Noise 4. Noise Quality of life 10. General Question Public Outreach 5. Land Use General Question

NOTE: Results only include comments received during comment period (i.e., before February 21, 2020). Draft for deliberation purposes only

Top Five Open House Comment Themes

“Approach runway [5] over river “Understanding of noise impact “Mandatory operation period “Aircraft are flying very low.” “Very loud engines and not Old Naples.” study is that it does not reflect of 7am to 10pm.” “There seems to be high noise.” “Can take-offs be dispersed more peak season because it “Mandatory flight curfew with variability in the altitude of “Flights are becoming evenly to reduce noise impacts?” averages across the year.” a monitoring body and fines.” planes during take-off and more frequent.” “Make the curfew mandatory.” landing.” Aircraft Flight Methodology Noise Paths Comment Airport Curfew Aircraft Altitude

80% of noise- Half of commenters Respondents had a Airport curfew Altitude comments related comments had concerns over range of questions comments indicated indicated concerns were concerns over flight path changes, about the modeling concerns over over aircraft flying engine noise and utilization of runways, methodology used aircraft flying at too low or not high flight frequency. and wished to have in the Part 150 nighttime hours and enough to avoid flights routed down Study. waking up residents. noise impacts. the river/bay.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

5 Methodology Comment Other Open House Comments “Flights crossing Old Naples are consistently crossing at a lower than necessary altitude which Air Quality Quality of Life causes noise impacts—will the “Noise level affects the ability to Part 150 Study document actual “Fumes from planes can be enjoy the outdoors and impacts historical flight path altitudes?” smelled.” quality of life.” “There is also soot from the aircraft exhaust that has been noticed.” Public Outreach Methodology Comment “Suggest additional outreach because Land Use “Noise impacts are not directly some people affected by noise may not over 5th Avenue in Old Naples— “Relocate the airport to a more be aware of the workshops.” they are spread throughout the rural area because it could sector—Will the study look at the increase revenue and generate actual flight paths and the actual jobs.” Aircraft Flight Paths impacted populations vs. the “Perhaps moving airport to “There was a change for flight paths to model’s predictions?” location that is out of town?” make right turns only from 23—why was this change made?”

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Noise History

Draft for deliberation purposes only

6 History of Noise at Naples Airport

• Goal 2 in the NAA strategic plan is balancing quality of life with the needs of the aviation community. • The NAA has over 30 years of experience addressing noise impacts in the Naples community. • The NAA has spent more than $8 million of its own funds on noise issues since 2000, not including the ongoing Part 150 Noise Study (est. cost $1.4 million) • Naples Airport is the only airport in the country with an approved Part 161 study that includes a “Be an engaged, responsive partner in service 24-hour ban of Stage 2 jet aircraft. to the community.”

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC)

• Established by the NAA in 1997 • Charged with studying airport noise compatibility methods and recommending programs to the NAA in efforts to address complaints • 9 total members − 1 member each representing 4 quadrants around airport (4 total) − 1 at large member located in City of Naples − 1 at large member located in Collier County − 1 member who is an active pilot − 1 member nominated by Naples City Council December 12, 2019 − 1 member nominated by Collier County Board of Joint NAA Board and NCC Workshop County Commissioners

Draft for deliberation purposes only

7 Major Noise Milestones at Naples Airport

1978 1987 1997

• First documented publication • NAA completes its first • NAA submits Part 150 NEM of noise abatement formal noise study. and NCP updates to FAA. procedures.

1998 2000 2010

• NAA submits second Part • NAA submits third NEM • NAA completes fourth NEM 150 NEM and NCP update. update to FAA. update. • NAA proposes 24-hour ban • NAA Submits Part 161 on Stage 1 jet aircraft. Study to FAA.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

History of Recommended Flight Tracks at Naples Airport

1987 2006 Current

Flight tracks have remained relatively consistent for the past 30+ years.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

8 Summary of Noise History at Naples Airport

• The NAA has an industry leading history addressing aircraft noise impacts • Only US airport to achieve a 24-hour ban on Stage 1 and 2 jet aircraft operations • High compliance with the Quiet Hours (voluntary nighttime curfew) at 98%+ compliance • The NAA is committed to the continued evaluation and refinement of its noise-related efforts, but is preempted and limited by federal law • NAA initiated a Part 150 noise study in 2020 to (1) better understand current and future anticipated noise impacts; (2) develop strategies to improve noise compatibility and (3) endeavor to mitigate aircraft noise impacts on the surrounding community

For more information on the History of Noise at Naples Airport, please visit the Noise Program Milestones webpage: https://flynaples.com/noise-program-milestones/

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Airspace Operational Overview

Draft for deliberation purposes only

9 Role of Naples ATCT and RSW TRACON

RSW Terminal Radar Approach Control Naples Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) (TRACON) • Naples ATCT directs aircraft ground • RSW TRACON oversees aircraft arriving and movements, takeoffs and landings to ensure departing aircraft to/from several airports in SWFL safe operations primarily within a 7-mile radius along established corridors in its airspace. of APF. • Once an aircraft is approximately 7-miles from • After takeoff, the Naples ATCT hands off APF and below 2,500’, TRACON hands off the control to RSW TRACON. aircraft to the Naples ATCT. • Naples ATCT and RSW TRACON coordinate • TRACON coordinates with airports to establish approach and departure procedures outlined arrival and departure procedures and handles in a Letter of Agreement. certain aircraft when Naples ATCT is closed (10 pm – 6 am).

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Coordination between Naples ATCT, RSW ATCT, and TRACON

• Naples ATCT works closely with RSW TRACON/ATCT to establish and implement procedures for aircraft arrivals and departures through a Letter of Agreement (LOA).

• The current LOA between Naples ATCT and RSW ATCT is dated November 14, 2017 and outlines the following: − Procedures for instrument flight rules (IFR), visual flight rules (VFR), and special VFR (SVFR) aircraft at Naples Airport − Standard departure headings are identified for each runway end for both jet and propeller aircraft Rendering of future RSW Tower/TRACON facility − All departures are assigned a 2,000’ departure hold, which restricts aircraft climb out until issued new instructions by the RSW ATCT/TRACON. This departure hold has been in place since at least April 1st, 1998

Draft for deliberation purposes only

10 Overview RSW TRACON guides departing aircraft along established ascent Naples ATCT issues a corridors in TRACON’s regional takeoff clearance, including airspace until the aircraft is handed off Naples ATCT directs the safe heading and altitude, then again to the enroute airspace ground movement, takeoff and hands the aircraft off to landings of aircraft RSW TRACON RSW TRACON airspace RSW ATCT airspace

Naples ATCT airspace

NOTE: The above graphic is intended to provide a simplified depiction of the relationship between Naples Tower and RSW Tower/TRACON—it is not for detailed interpretation. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Noise Modeling, Operational Analysis, and Land Use Compatibility

Draft for deliberation purposes only

11 Noise Modeling Noise Contours of Aircraft noise modeling allows: Aircraft Operations • Calculation of noise exposure at any point • Depicting annual average day aircraft NEM noise exposure • Predicting future aircraft noise exposure • Assessing changes in noise impacts resulting from runway configuration Land Use Map changes or new runways • Assessing changes in fleet mix and/or number of operations • Evaluating operational procedures

NOTE: The above pictures are not a result of this Part 150 Study.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Noise Modeling Inputs

Aircraft Operational Data Inputs • The amount of noise exposure is determined by: − Detailed fleet mix Detailed Time of Day − Stage length Fleet Mix Stage Length − Time of day (nighttime penalty; 1 nighttime operation = 10 daytime operations) • The noise exposure distribution is determined by: − Runway configuration and use Flight Track − Flight track locations and use Runway Location Meteorological • Other Factors Use and Use conditions − Meteorological Conditions

Draft for deliberation purposes only

12 Noise Modeling with AEDT

Modeling Inputs Modeling Program

Noise modeling inputs are used in AEDT in order to Detailed Meteorological Time of Fleet Mix conditions Day generate noise contours which show areas of equal Aviation noise exposure around an Environmental airport and are overlaid on Flight Track Design Tool a land use map to identify Runway Location } Stage Length (AEDT) Version 3c noncompatible land uses. Use and Use

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Noise Modeling vs. Noise Measurement Noise Measurement Noise Modeling

• Computer programs calculate aircraft noise • Noise can be measured with monitoring based on performance data and user inputs. equipment placed within areas where aircraft fly. • Provides a glimpse into the past, presents, and • Noise measurements represent a glimpse in future conditions under different scenarios. time at a specific location. • Noise can be calculated over specific areas or • Provides real-time data. large geographic areas.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

13 Data Collection Process and Status Updates

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Steps Complete

Draft for deliberation purposes only

14 Naples Airport Aircraft Density

Jet Arrivals All Runways Jet Departures All Runways

NOTE: Figures represent aircraft density in Calendar Year (CY) 2019. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 05 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

15 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 05 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 23 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

16 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 23 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 14 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

17 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 14 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 32 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

18 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 32 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Steps In-Progress

Draft for deliberation purposes only

19 Naples Airport Aircraft Analysis – Preliminary Runway Utilization

• Runway use is a major factor in Arrival/ Runway Total the how noise is distributed Departure 05 23 14 32 throughout the community Raw Data1 • Runway 05-23 is the primary runway for aircraft operations at Arrivals 44% 43% 7% 6% 100% Naples Airport. Departures 50% 36% 8% 6% 100% • Aircraft takeoff and land into the Touch-and-Go 48% 34% 10% 8% 100% wind due to aircraft performance (T&G) characteristics Vector Data2 • Jet aircraft generally require Arrivals 45% 38% 10% 7% 100% longer runway that piston Departures 49% 33% 10% 7% 99% powered aircraft SOURCE: 1. Raw data was obtained from HMMH for CY 2019. 2. Vector data was obtained from October 2019 through May 2020. Percentages do not total to 100% due to unknown runway assignments.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

ESA is currently developing Flight Track Analysis the ‘backbone’ AEDT flight tracks

Review the corridors Utilize radar data to Analyze primary and backbone flight assign flight track corridors and Separate data by tracks and Utilize radar data to utilization by aircraft Review Flight Track separate data by arrival/departure and developed up to 8 assign dispersion for category (GA jet, Radar Data. these corridors to runway end. sub-tracks for each sub-tracks. turboprop, and develop “backbone” backbone flight piston/prop, and AEDT flight tracks. track. helicopters).

Draft for deliberation purposes only

20 Flight Track Analysis The flight corridors will form a “backbone” flight track that will be Primary arrival and departure flight combined with sub-tracks flanking each tracks for each runway end are “backbone” to depict the dispersion of being categorized to identify flight arrivals and departures to APF. corridors to each runway end.

Sub-track

Backbone flight track

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Immediate Next Steps

Draft for deliberation purposes only

21 Naples Airport Forecast

• Naples Airport has seen and increase in number of turboprop and jet aircraft (i.e., business/corporate aviation). • Increase in operations is also supported by the surrounding area

growth and continued airport FY2019 Actual improvements. 112,800 • In the near to mid-term, certain segments of General Aviation may be less likely to be impacted by the

COVID19 pandemic than SOURCE: Naples Airport Master Plan, 2020. FAA OPSNET database and ESA analysis, 2018. commercial aviation.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Operational Information Base Year Forecast 2017 2023 2028 2038 Based Aircraft • High seasonal variations in noise Single-Engine 230 257 277 323 Multi-Engine (piston & turboprop) 69 76 84 94 exposure are due to increased Jet 67 83 94 120 aircraft travel in the winter and Rotorcraft 14 20 27 34 Total 380 436 482 571 early spring (e.g., February Categories of Operations through March). Local Operations 18,708 19,600 19,800 21,300 Itinerant Operations 76,274 83,600 90,200 103,800 • Peak months represent 11.3% of Total 94,982 103,200 110,000 125,100 Instrument Operations 41,595 48,500 52,800 62,600 the annual operations. Operational Fleet Mix Single-Engine 52,810 54,700 55,600 59,400 • In recent years, itinerant activity Multi-Engine (piston & turboprop) 13,677 14,400 14,900 15,700 has been in the 80 to 82% range, Jet 26,690 32,000 36,300 44,400 while local operations are below Rotorcraft 1,805 2,100 3,200 5,600 20%. Peaks in Total Aircraft Operations Peak Month 9,490 11,660 12,430 14,140 Average Day of Peak Month 321 380 400 460 Peak Hour of Average Day 48 56 60 68 SOURCE: Naples Airport Master Plan, 2020. FAA’s National Based Aircraft Inventory Program, FAA OPSNET database, and ESA analyses, 2018.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

22 Land Use Compatibility Neighborhood Existing and Future Parcel Data Boundaries Land Use Jurisdictional Boundaries Land use data is being collected to generate a map of existing and future land use surrounding Naples Airport. The land use data will be combined with noise contours generated from AEDT to identify compatible and noncompatible land uses.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Example Land Use Data Sources

City of Naples National Park Service • City Corporate Boundary • Historic Resources • Historic Districts Florida Historical Commission • Local Historic Landmarks • State Historic Landmarks • Park Boundaries U.S. Geologic Survey • Streets • Water Bodies Collier County • Libraries • Schools • Existing and Future Land Use • Parcel Data

Draft for deliberation purposes only

23 Noise Sensitive Land Use Compatibility Land Use Types

The FAA considers DNL 65 dB as the noise Historic Residential exposure level above which is considered Properties noncompatible for noise sensitive land uses; however, the City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB as Schools, Place of the threshold of significance. Assisted College, Worship Living Universities A detailed analysis of noise exposure allows for airport sponsors to identify noncompatible land uses and evaluate measures to reduce noise impacts. Hospitals and Libraries Healthcare Daycare

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Alternative Community Outreach Strategies in the COVID-19 Environment

Draft for deliberation purposes only

24 Originally Planned Community Outreach

COVID-19 has forced ESA and NAA to re-think how we engage the Naples community. Small Community Meetings Community Retail Style Outreach

Small community meetings with groups Retail style community events (farmers DESCRIPTION of ~10 people. market, festival, etc.) where individuals could stop and ask questions.

To conduct targeted community To increase awareness, gain feedback, and outreach in a small, personal setting help inform the broader Naples community PURPOSE with interested parties and receive that they could be affected by project feedback. recommendations.

Coordination meetings would be no Events would consist of an 8 hour day when DURATION more than 2 hours in length. including setup, staffing and breakdown.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Alternative Strategies for Performing Community Outreach

ESA is interested in the TAC’s suggestions on how to perform public outreach in the current environment, while being Stay at least Wash your Wear Following Stay home Do not touch 6 feet a part hands often facemasks CDC when you eyes nose able to acknowledge from other with soap for in public guidelines are sick. and mouth people. at least 20 spaces. for and cover guidelines issued by the seconds. disinfecting mouth when frequently coughing. Centers for Disease touched Control (CDC). surfaces.

Draft for deliberation purposes only

25 Draft for deliberation purposes only

Future Meetings

Technical Advisory Committee • TAC Meeting #3 November 5, 2020 • TAC Meeting #4 (Tentative) January 2021

• Reminder notices will be sent out in advance of each meeting

All TAC Materials will be posted on the Project Website following the meeting at: https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/

Draft for deliberation purposes only

26 Questions

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #2

Meeting Summary

Appendix G-3

TAC Meeting #3

November 5, 2020

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #3

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

AGENDA

Airport Office Building, 200 Aviation Drive North, Naples or By Registering via the Virtual Meeting Link Below

Thursday, November 5, 2020 9:30 a.m.

Please note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the TAC meeting will be a hybrid meeting whereby the public is invited to participate in person or via Zoom. Members of the public may join the webinar by registering at the following link: http://bit.ly/apftacworkshop3

Committee Members Bruce Barone – Fifth Avenue South Business Improvement District Representative Joan Tobin – Third Street South Business Improvement District Representative Phil Boyer – Piston Representative Jerry Brown – City at Large Representative Michael Dalby – Greater Naples Chamber Representative Danielle Hudson – Naples Area Board of Realtors Representative Steve Kingston – Jet Representative David Norgard – Southeast Representative Daniel O’Brien – Northwest Representative Andy Reed – County at Large Representative Jamie Robinson – Northeast Representative Raymond Stricklen– Southwest Representative

Liaisons/Participants Commissioner Donna M. Messer – Naples Airport Authority Liaison City Councilor Gary Price – Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Peter Green – Federal Aviation Administration Liaison Joe Molsen – TRACON/RSW Liaison Stacey Nichols – Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Liaison Robin Singer – City of Naples Planning Department Liaison Jamie French – Collier County Growth Management Division Liaison Christopher A. Rozansky – Executive Director William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC – Authority Counsel

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #3

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – November 5, 2020 Part 150 Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #3

Technical Advisory Committee Members and Liaisons

Voting Members Organization Committee Liaisons Organization Jamie Robinson Northeast Quadrant Commissioner Donna M. Messer Naples Airport Authority Liaison Daniel O'Brien Northwest Quadrant City Council Member Gary Price Noise Compatibility Committee David Norgard Southeast Quadrant Peter Green Federal Aviation Administration Raymond Stricklen Southwest Quadrant Joe Molsen TRACON/RSW Andy Reed County at Large Stacey Nichols Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Jerry Brown City at Large Robin Singer City of Naples Planning Department Phil Boyer Active Pilot Jamie French Collier County Growth Management Steve Kingston Active Pilot Division Bruce Barone Fifth Avenue South Business Executive Director Chris Rozansky Naples Airport Authority Improvement District Authority Attorney William L. Owens, Naples Airport Authority Joan Tobin Third Street South Business District Esq., of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC Michael Dalby Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Diane Terrill Naples Airport Authority Danielle Hudson Naples Area Board of Realtors

1 Pledge Of Allegiance

Presentation Materials Overview

• Summary of TAC #2 • Principles of Noise Impacts • Aircraft Activity Forecast • Data Collection – Operational Analysis

− Runway Use

− Fleet Mix

− Flight Tracks • Data Collection – Land Use • Noise Modeling • Next Steps

Part 150 Studies Must Adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 Guidelines to be Accepted and Approved by FAA

2 Summary of TAC #2

Summary of TAC #2

• Results from three open house workshop held in February 2020 Pending results for the • Overview of NAA’s noise history following: • Roles of Naples Air Traffic Control Tower and RSW TRACON in • Runway utilization managing the operational airspace surrounding APF • Fleet mix • Noise modeling methodology and data for performing noise • Aircraft flight tracks analyses • Activity forecast • Plots of aircraft density and altitude of each runway end at APF • Land use

• Discussion on alternative outreach in the COVID-19 environment

• Updates on Project Schedule and anticipated dates for the next TAC meeting

3 Principles of Noise Impacts

Physics of Noise – Understanding Sound Levels

• Sound energy is measured in decibels (dB) on a logarithmic scale • Aircraft noise is measured on an A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale to better correlate the measure of sound to the human hearing response • On this scale, normal human speech is about 60-65 dBA and a typical vacuum cleaner is about 70 dBA—about 10 times the energy of normal human speech • It takes a +/- 3 dB change in the level of noise for most people to notice • A 10 dB increase or decrease is typically perceived as doubling or halving the loudness • Doubling or halving of the distance from the source of the receiver equates to +/- 6 dB sound level change

SOURCE: Adapted from the FAA, 2020.

4 DNL Refresher

• The Single Event Sound Level (SEL) metric represents the total sound energy of a single, individual noise event compressed into one second • Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) is the maximum, or peak, sound level during a noise event • Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL) represents the weighted average noise level over a 24-hour period • FAA has adopted the DNL as the primary metric for aviation noise studies • A doubling or halving airport operations equates to a +/- 3 dB change in DNL • Using DNL, one nighttime flight is equivalent to 10 flights during the day

People are generally more sensitive to changes in exposure than the level of noise

Aircraft Activity Forecasts

5 APF Forecast Overview

• Overall 20-year forecast of annual operations (approved by the FAA on May 9, 2018) are no longer considered appropriate for use in the Part 150 • Forecast memorandum (dated October 10, 2020) documents: − past trends at APF resulting from other shock events − activity that occurred prior to the pandemic − level of operations that have been recorded through September 2020 • Goal is to develop a reasonable estimate of the activity expected in 2021 and 2026 for use in developing the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps • Includes results from interviews with more than 100 aircraft operator and passenger at APF

FAA is currently reviewing the forecast memo developed for APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps

Prior Shock Events at Naples Airport

• September 11, 2001 − Two years of significant decreases followed by two years of growth − Four years to full recovery in 2005, which marks highest level of annual operations to date • Great Recession − Aircraft activity decreased by -21.9 percent in 2009 and -18.9 in 2010, which was the lowest recorded operations since the ATCT was commissioned • COVID-19 − Had the pandemic not occurred, APF would have fully recovered from 2008 recession in 2024

6 Aircraft Operations During COVID-19

• Recovery at APF has been led by Comparison of Month 2019 2020 growth in air taxi operations and an 2020 to 2019 increase in the share of general aviation itinerant activity January 10,849 11,612 7.00% • 34% of aircraft activity (through February 11,586 10,848 -6.40% September 2020) are by jet aircraft March 11,488 10,671 -7.10% compared to 30.9% in 2019 April 10,108 5,089 -49.70% • Total jet operations through May 9,562 7,288 -23.80% September 2020 is 23,867 compared June 6,825 6,933 1.60% to 25,066 in 2019 July 6,871 6,351 -7.60% August 6,920 5,727 -17.20% • Quantity of Jet A fuel sold (through September 6,992 5,620 -19.60% September 2020) was 2.6% higher Total Operations 81,201 70,139 -13.60% than the same period in 2019 Through Sept. SOURCE: 1. FAA OPSNET database and ESA analysis, 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

Projected Aircraft Activity

Activity through the end of 2020 is • Annual 2019 FAA anticipated to be similar to 2019 Year Difference Operations TAF1 • Given the year to date activity and strong GA activity, it is realistic that APF will Estimate of Annual Total continue to recover from the COVID-19 2 impacts 2020 100,600 110,950 -9.30% • For evaluating noise impacts, jet activity is Projected Activity expected to increase 2.5% each year from 2021 101,900 111,327 -8.5% the current estimate of 34.0% of total 2026 108,700 113,241 -4.0% activity SOURCE: 1. Issued January 2020 with data based on FAA fiscal year which ends September 30th. − 34,200 operations in 2020 2. Includes 2019 operations for months October through December. − 39,700 jet operations by 2026

preliminary data – subject to change

7 2020 Aircraft Operator and Passenger Interview

• More consumers are considering and using private aircraft as an option to travel to/from Naples • 81% of the passengers interviewed own property, were looking to buy property, or had a personal connection to property in the Naples area • Most of the fractional, charter, and aircraft management companies that have a presence or frequently utilize APF stated that business was significantly better this summer than last year − They also anticipate a stronger than typical late summer, fall, and winter this year • Some operators and pilots believe that a portion of their newer passengers will not continue to fly private aircraft once the COVID-19 pandemic is under control • Increase in leisure travel on private aircraft under the current conditions − Most operators believe private aircraft business travel will pick up as travel restrictions are relaxed

Data Collection – Operational Analysis

8 Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix

Organize data Obtain aircraft data according to specific Review and 'clean' Create a fleet mix that from Noise and AEDT aircraft types data to remove represents operations Operations System that are approved by incomplete or at APF (NOMs) the FAA's Office of inaccurate information Environment and Energy

Airport sponsors must get individual approval from FAA’s Office of Energy and Environment for aircraft types not listed in the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT)

preliminary data – subject to change

Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix Jet Fleet Mix AEDT Fleet Share Aircraft Examples AEDT Fleet Share Aircraft Examples Cessna 550 Citation II, 560 Citation XLS; Embraer 505, CNA55B 13.00% CNA500 2.04% Cessna 500 Citation I, 501 Citation ISP, 525 Citation Jet Embraer Legacy 500, Legacy 650 Bombardier Challenger 300, 350, 600; Bombardier CL600 12.52% GV 1.63% Gulfstream G500, G550, and G600; Gulfstream V-SP CRJ-100, 200, and 400 Gulfstream G100, G150, G280; Israel IAI-1121 CNA560XL 11.68% Cessna 560 Citation XLS IA1125 1.26% Commodore, IAI-1123, IAI-1124 Westwind I Bombardier Learjet 31, 35, 36, 40, 45, 60, etc.; Dassault LEAR35 9.57% CIT3 1.16% Cessna 650 Citation III Falcon 10, 100; Hawker HS-125 Series 1, 3, 400 Bombardier Learjet 60; Cessna 750 Citation X; Mitsubishi MU-300 Diamond; Raytheon Beechjet 400, CNA750 9.52% MU3001 1.05% Dassault Falcon 200, 2000; Gulfstream G200 Raytheon Premier I Citation 680 Citation Sovereign, Cessna 680-A Citation Bombardier Global 6000, 7000, 8000 Business Jet; CNA680 8.84% BD-700-1A10 0.92% Latitude, Cessna 700 Citation Longitude Bombardier Global Express Cessna 525 Citation Jet, 525B Citation Jet, 525C CNA525C 6.63% ECLIPSE500 0.58% Eclipse 500; Hawker Beechjet 400A Citation Jet CNA560E 5.93% Cessna 560 Citation V BD-700-1A11 0.57% Bombardier Global 5000 Business CNA560U 3.43% Cessna 560 Citation Excel, Cessna 560 Citation V G650ER 0.52% Gulfstream G650, 650ER Cessna 510 Citation; Embraer 500 and Embraer CNA510 3.34% EMB145 0.18% Embraer ERJ135, ERJ135-ER, ERJ135-LR, ERJ140 Legacy 450; EPIC Victory GIV 3.03% Falcon 7X, 8X; Gulfstream G300, G350, G400 CRJ9-ER 0.01% Bombardier CRJ-100, 200, 700 FAL900EX 2.58% Dassault Falcon 50, 900, 900-B, C, EX, TOTAL 99.9% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. The aircraft identified here are a selection of aircraft types that the AEDT aircraft may represent. The AEDT aircraft may be representative of other similar aircraft types. 3. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

preliminary data – subject to change

9 Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix

Turboprop Fleet Mix AEDT Fleet Share Aircraft Examples DeHavilland DHC-6-100 Twin Otter, DHC-6-200 Twin Otter, DHC-6-300 Twin Otter; Dornier 228-100 Series; DHC6 42.42% Farichild SA-226-T Merlin III

CNA208 34.20% Cessna 208 Caravan; Pilatus PC-12; Dehavilland DHC-3 Turbo Otter; Socata TBM-9

CNA441 13.82% Cessna 425 Conquest I, 441 Conquest II; Piper PA-31T Cheyenne, Piper PA46-TP Meridian

PA31 4.99% Piper PA46 Meridian; Britten-Norman BN-2 Islander

PA42 2.68% Piper PA-42 Cheyenne Series; Raytheon Super King Air 300

C12 1.74% Raytheon Super King Air 200

EMB120 0.05% Embraer EMB120 Brasilia SF340 0.05% Saab 340-A, 340-B, 340-B-Plus; AED Jetstream 41; CASA CN-235-100 T34 0.05% Beech Mentor PT6A-25; Ayres S2R-T34 Turbo-Thrush TOTAL 100% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. The aircraft identified here are a selection of aircraft types that the AEDT aircraft may represent. The AEDT aircraft may be representative of other similar aircraft types.

preliminary data – subject to change

Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix Propeller Fleet Mix AEDT Fleet Share Aircraft Examples CNA172 22.63% Cessna 170 Series, 172 Skyhawk, 175 Series, 177 Series; Lancair 360; Aviat Husky A1B

GASEPF 22.61% Cessna 140, 152, 162; Diamond DV-20 Katana; Piper J-3 Cub, PA-18-150, PA-38 Tomahawk; Vans RV3, RV4, RV12

COMSEP 18.73% Cirrus SR20, SR22, SR22 Turbo

GASEPV 14.46% Maule MT-7-235; Ryan Navion B, F; Raytheon Beech Bonanza 33, 35, 36; Mooney M20-K

BEC58P 8.37% Raytheon Beech 55 Baron, Beech Baron 58, Beech 60 Duke; Cessna 310, 340, 402, 404 Titan II

PA30 5.61% Piper PA-30 Twin Comanche; Dimaond DA42 Twin Star, Diamond DA62; Piper Seminole

CNA20T 2.38% Cessna 182 Turbo; Cessna 206

CNA182 1.91% Cessna 182, 185 Skywagon

PA28 1.66% Piper PA-28 Cherokee Six Series; Pilatus PC-6 Porter

CNA206 1.63% Cessna 206; Comp Air Aviation Comp Air 10

TOTAL 99.99% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. The aircraft identified here are a selection of aircraft types that the AEDT aircraft may represent. The AEDT aircraft may be representative of other similar aircraft types. 3. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

preliminary data – subject to change

10 Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix

Helicopter Fleet Mix AEDT Fleet Share Aircraft Examples A109 38.36% Augusta A-109; A-119

EC130 17.72% Eurocopter EC-130; EC-T2

H500D 14.80% Hughes 500D; Robinson R22; Schweizer S269D/330

B407 11.70% Bell 407

R44 11.23% Robinson R44 Raven

B212 3.33% Bell UH-1 Iroquois, AH-1S Cobra, 214B-1

B429 2.34% Bell 429

S76 0.41% Sikorsky S-76 Spirit, S-76C

S70 0.12% Sikorsky S-70 (UH-60) Blackhawk, Sikorsky (SH-60) Sea Hawk

TOTAL 100% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. The aircraft identified here are a selection of aircraft types that the AEDT aircraft may represent. The AEDT aircraft may be representative of other similar aircraft types.

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Condition Arrival Runway Use

Runway Aircraft Category Total 05 14 23 32 Daytime Jet Aircraft 43% 5% 47% 4% 100% Turboprop Aircraft 45% 6% 43% 6% 100% Propeller Aircraft 46% 6% 43% 6% 100% Nighttime Jet Aircraft 58% 3% 38% 1% 100% Turboprop Aircraft 59% 17% 21% 3% 100% Propeller Aircraft 51% 9% 34% 6% 100% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

preliminary data – subject to change

11 Baseline Condition Departure Runway Use

Runway Aircraft Category Total 05 14 23 32 Daytime Jet Aircraft 49% 6% 41% 5% 100% Turboprop Aircraft 52% 9% 34% 5% 100% Propeller Aircraft 56% 6% 32% 6% 100% Nighttime Jet Aircraft 79% 4% 15% 2% 100% Turboprop Aircraft 72% 6% 15% 7% 100% Propeller Aircraft 68% 6% 20% 6% 100% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF. 2. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

preliminary data – subject to change

Runway Use – All Aircraft

Legend DAY: 6% DAY: 52% NIGHT: 6% NIGHT: 74% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 44% DAY: 6% NIGHT: 55% NIGHT: 5%

preliminary data – subject to change

12 Runway Use – All Aircraft

Legend DAY: 5% DAY: 45% NIGHT: 4% NIGHT: 35% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 36% DAY: 5% NIGHT: 17% NIGHT: 3%

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Condition Runway Use – All Aircraft

Runway Time Total 05 14 23 32 Arrivals Day 44% 6% 45% 5% 100% Night 55% 6% 35% 3% 100% Total 45% 6% 45% 5% 100% Departures Day 52% 6% 36% 5% 100% Night 74% 5% 17% 4% 100% Total 53% 6% 36% 5% 100% SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

13 Flight Track Analysis

Utilize radar data to Analyze primary Review the corridors assign flight track corridors and and backbone flight Separate data by Utilize radar data to utilization by aircraft Review Flight Track separate data by tracks and arrival/departure and assign dispersion for category (GA jet, Radar Data these corridors to developed up to 8 runway end sub-tracks turboprop, and develop “backbone” sub-tracks for each piston/prop, and AEDT flight tracks backbone flight track helicopters)

Flight Tracks

Runway Flight Track Total 05 14 23 32 Arrivals Backbone 40 21 20 15 96 Sub-tracks 138 60 82 52 332 Total 178 81 102 67 428 Departures Backbone 26 24 28 20 98 Sub-tracks 96 76 106 72 350 Total 122 100 134 92 448 Touch-and-Go Backbone 2 2 2 2 8 Sub-tracks 4 4 4 4 24 Total 6 6 6 6 32 SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 operational data obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

14 Sample Flight Track Analysis – Runway 05 (All Aircraft)

Radar tracks AEDT Backbone AEDT Backbone tracks with Sub-tracks

SOURCE: • All images include calendar year 2019 radar data for all aircraft types.

preliminary data – subject to change

All Aircraft All Aircraft Runway 05 Arrivals Departures

SOURCE: • Includes calendar year 2019 radar data for all aircraft types obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

15 All Aircraft All Aircraft Runway 23 Arrivals Departures

SOURCE: • Includes calendar year 2019 radar data for all aircraft types obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

All Aircraft All Aircraft Runway 32 Arrivals Departures

SOURCE: • Includes calendar year 2019 radar data for all aircraft types obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

16 All Aircraft All Aircraft Runway 14 Arrivals Departures

SOURCE: • Includes calendar year 2019 radar data for all aircraft types obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

Touch and Go Operations

• Touch and Go flight tracks reflect aircraft using the closed patterns for each runway

SOURCE: • Includes calendar year 2019 radar data obtained from APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

17 Data Collection – Land Use

Example Land Use Data Sources

Collier County Google Earth Pro® • Hospitals • Places of Worship • City Boundaries • Nursing Homes • Libraries • Schools National park Service • Roadways • Historic Resources • Park locations County Appraiser • Parcel Data U.S. Geologic Survey • Water Bodies

preliminary data – subject to change

18 Land Use Compatibility Neighborhood Existing and Future Parcel Data Boundaries Land Use Jurisdictional Boundaries Land use data is being collected to generate a map of existing and future land use surrounding Naples Airport. The land use data will be combined with noise contours generated from AEDT to identify compatible and noncompatible land uses.

Noise Sensitive Land Use Compatibility Land Use Types

19 DRAFT – IN PROGRESS Land Use – Existing Conditions

preliminary data – subject to change

DRAFT – IN PROGRESS Land Use – Existing Conditions

preliminary data – subject to change

20 Noise Modeling

Noise Modeling

Modeling Inputs Modeling Program

Noise modeling will be performed to generate Detailed Meteorological Time of Fleet Mix conditions Day noise contours which will be overlaid on a land use Aviation map to identify Environmental noncompatible land uses. Flight Track Design Tool Runway Location } Stage Length (AEDT) Version 3c Use and Use

21 Next Steps

Recent and Scheduled Outreach Activities

Recent Outreach • August 27, 2020 – Moorings Park Grande Lake Board Member Meeting • September 14, 2020 – City Council Workshop Meeting • October 16, 2020 – Naples Pelican Bay Rotary • November 4, 2020 – Lunch and Learn with Naples Board of Realtors (NABOR) Upcoming Outreach • March 25, 2021 – Old Naples Association outreach presentation Other activities • Development of a short video that can be sent to the HOA president’s councils and community groups to promote awareness of the study

22 Future Meetings

Technical Advisory Committee • TAC Meeting #4 (Tentative) TBD 2021 • TAC Meeting #5 (Tentative) TBD 2021

• Reminder notices will be sent out in advance of each meeting

All TAC Materials will be posted on the Project Website following the meeting at: https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/

Future Schedule*

• Fall 2020 – Complete set up of Noise Model • Winter 2020 - Develop Noise Contours • Spring 2021 – Complete Draft NEM Report and Public Outreach • Late Spring 2021 – Respond to Comments on Draft NEM Report • Early Summer 2021 – Complete Final Draft NEM Report • Summer 2021 – FAA Completes Initial Review • Late Summer 2021 – Complete Final NEM Report • Fall 2021 – FAA Acceptance of NEM Report

*Note: Schedule is subject to approval of forecasts by the FAA

23 Questions

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #3

Meeting Summary

Minutes of the November 5, 2020 Regular Meeting of the City of Naples Airport Authority Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Virtual Zoom Video Conference

A. ROLL CALL

The meeting was called to order by Michael Arnold at 9:30 a.m. on the Zoom video call.

Committee members present were Jamie Robinson (in person), Daniel O’Brien (virtual), David Norgard (virtual), Raymond Stricklen (virtual), Phil Boyer (in person), Steve Kingston (virtual), Joan Tobin (virtual), Bruce Barone (virtual), Michael Dalby (virtual), Danielle Hudson(virtual), Jerry Brown (in person) and Andy Reed (virtual).

Liaisons present were Commissioner Donna M. Messer (virtual), City Councilor Gary Price (virtual), Robin Singer (virtual), Jamie French (virtual), Peter Green (virtual), Christopher Rozansky (virtual) and William Owens (in person).

It was confirmed that quorum was established, as there were three in-person committee members in attendance. The three committee members in attendance took a vote on the participation of those attending virtually. It was stated that extraordinary circumstances exist and a motion to allow those TAC members not present to be able to vote was moved by Jerry Brown. Phil Boyer seconded the motion.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Michael Arnold led the Pledge of Allegiance.

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

There were no changes to the agenda.

D. MINUTES

David Norgard moved to approve the June 23, 2020 Noise Compatibility Committee Meeting Minutes. Joan Tobin seconded the motion. The motion passed 12 – 0.

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS 1. Summary of TAC Meeting #2 – ESA

Michael Arnold of ESA began the presentation by introducing the materials that will be reviewed during the TAC meeting. The first item on the list is a summary of the previous meeting, TAC #2, which was held on June 23 via virtual Zoom video conference. Topics covered during TAC #2 included items such as results from February’s three public workshops, an overview of Naples Airport’s noise history, and an overview of airspace operations. TAC members were also introduced to noise modeling, operational analysis and land use compatibility. Michael Arnold also encouraged a discussion about alternative community outreach strategies in the COVID-19 environment. TAC Meeting #2 was closed with updates on the project schedule and anticipated dates for the next TAC meeting.

TAC Regular Meeting Minutes January 30, 2020 Page 1

Ray Stricklen asked if it was possible to distribute the previous meeting minutes closer to the meeting date, as it can be difficult to remember the discussion after so many months. Michael Arnold confirmed that this is something the team would be able to accommodate.

Dianne Terril introduced Zach Burch, the new outreach and communications manager, to meeting attendees before the presentation continued on.

2. Principles of Noise Impacts – ESA

Michael Arnold introduced the Principles of Noise Impacts, which covered the physics of noise and the meaning of Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL). He also acknowledged that runway use and fleet can affect noise levels.

3. Aircraft Activity Forecasts – ESA

Michael Arnold noted that forecasts that were developed as part of the master plan effort back in 2018. Activity exceeded projected levels, resulting in the need for a forecast update. The goal is to develop a reasonable estimate of the activity expected in 2021 and for use in developing the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps. To do so, there is a need for understanding the effects of COVID- 19 on airport activity. Michael Arnold reviewed prior shock events at Naples Airport, such as September and the Great Recession. After September 11, airport traffic recovered by 2005. However, if COVID-19 had not occurred, APF was projected to fully recover from the 2008 Great recession in 2024. 2020 APF operations are only down by a little over 1,000 operations in comparison to 2019. Jet activity is projected to grow through 2026, with 34,200 operations in 2020 going up to 39,700 operations by 2026.

Joan Tobin had two questions. She asked how the decrease in traffic caused by COVID has impacted revenue and budgets at APF. She also wanted to know if business traveler versus vacationers are being measuring when analyzing the forecast. Chris Rozansky responded that April had 70% decline in fuel sales, but with the stronger than budgeted months, APF made up for the shortfall. The fleet mix has changed to more business travel than expected at APF because people don’t want to travel commercially. There has been a shift in traffic patterns and APF is still seeing typical busy days, but now additional days (such as a Monday or Tuesday) could become busy as well. Joan Tobin also wanted to know if “suits” (business passengers) have been flying in. Chris Rozansky responded that yes, suits are flying in. Michal Arnold noted that leisure travel has driven the recovery – while business has been lagging.

Raymond Stricklen asked if the study team has looked into the differences in aircraft mix, such as jet and turboprop. He noted that jet traffic and the flight tracks of jet traffic are a part of the noise. Michael responded that they have been able to break out the business aircraft side and understand the dynamics. He noted that when he says business aircraft, he means the general aviation jet aircraft segment of the fleet. There has been a shift in the fleet profile that the leisure travelers are tending to use the smaller cabin aircraft in comparison to business travel that uses larger cabin aircraft. The team will be looking at trends and making necessary adjustments. Raymond Stricklen stated that he is not sure that it matters if its business or leisure travel, as the noise is similar whether its leisure or business travel.

Ute Vandersluis asked what the October 2020 operations numbers were. Diane responded that there have been 8,213 operations in October at APF 21% decreases from last October. It was 30% above in Jet fuel sales for the month.

4. Data Collection – Operational Analysis – ESA Michael Arnold stated that there is a detailed analysis with available information. Naples has a fair amount of real operational data available because the airport had the aircraft noise and operations system set up, which captures radar tracks and information related to aircraft activity. Once the data is pulled, aircraft are grouped by AEDT and then a fleet mix that represents operations at APF is created.

Andy Reed asked if any forecasts have been done with consideration to weight limits between aircraft or if any deviation in weight restrictions may occur. Michael Arnold responded that they are assuming no changes are taking place with weight limit restrictions.

Joan Tobin asked how government flights fit in and if they are segmented out. Mike responded that they are included in the fleet mix and operation count. These operations are not weighted differently, as they make noise just like other operations.

Raymond Stricklen wanted to know if it was possible to distinguish stage three aircraft from stage four or five aircraft. Michael Arnold stated that this is something that will done moving forward, but also noted that there is no good source of this information publicly available at this point in time. Raymond Stricklen also noted that the GAO report compared to APF is a huge jump because GAO is largely based on commercial traffic while APF has a broad range of general aviation aircraft. He was hesitant to make an analogy using GAO with regard to Naples general aviation aircraft. Michael agreed that they needed to be cautious about jumping to broad conclusions.

Jamie Robinson asked if AEDT correlates with stage aircraft classifications. Michael responded that AEDT looks at different aircraft signatures based on the actual operational profiles. Jamie also asked if there is any way that the fleet mix stages can be included. Michael Arnold confirmed that there is going to be an investigation of this as they move through the process.

Michael Arnold then reviewed runway use, which was broken down into daytime and nighttime departures and arrivals, as well as by different segments of aircraft fleet. He noted that departures use runway five at night more often than any other runways and that daytime runway use is more balanced in comparison.

Gary Price wanted to note that when runway use at APF is being analyzed, he has noticed more charter jets prefer 5/23 because of approaches, although winds may suggest 14/32. He stated the importance of analyzing this in the Part 150 process because it impacts those who live under 5/23. Joan Tobin seconded this because this is where she has heard people complaining.

Raymond Stricklen noted that runway use can change from manager to manager at the ATC. It was an observable change when management changed at ATC. Currently, there may be a shift back to 5/23. Michael Arnold responded that this is what they are trying to establish as a baseline for noise conditions. If things are shifting, the team wants to show that, in addition to the impact

if it is modified. Chris Rozansky added that he is not sure if it is a change in procedure or use from one runway to another. There has been a greater proportion of jets and a reduction in flight trainings. It is early to jump to conclusions, but they are not aware of any changes to air traffic procedures.

Jamie Robinson wanted to note that there was no open house in the NE quadrant and there has not been one scheduled even though they have most of the noise. Chris Rozansky responded by offering a small group meeting to that community, which could be coordinated after the meeting.

Donna Messer asked if pilot preference factors into the numbers for runway use. Michael Arnold responded that it can, if the pilot requests a certain runway and air traffic accommodates them. From a jet standpoint they may want access to a longer runway or a runway with the best wind conditions. Donna asked if it would be hard to get a sense of how often this happens, and Michael stated that the air traffic group would be able to give insight into this.

Joan Tobin followed up on Jamie Robinsons comment by requesting that someone follow up with her, as she would like to set up a meeting with 3rd Street South Merchants Association. Chris Rozansky confirmed that they will follow up with her. Dianne Terill reaffirmed that they will follow up and stated that she can always reach out to Zach directly as well. Joan noted that she has issues with her Naples email and Dianne responded that they will have IT reach out to her.

Phil Boyer commented that it pays to look at the length of 5/23 and the instrument approach capability. Runway length and instrument approach are significant in determining runway use from an operator standpoint, even with the different winds. I have seen this from personal use.

Ray Stricklen noted that he found it interesting arrivals were almost the same and departures were different despite the meteorological conditions likely being the same.

Ray Stricklen asked if Michael Arnold would be able to decipher which aircraft and the number of aircraft that are operating at 1000 feet, so one can distinguish what kind of altitudes aircraft operate at over the old Naples area. Michael responded that during the last meeting, graphical information that show the altitude of aircraft as they departed was presented but they are still doing a statistical analysis on the data to get a better understanding on what the average altitudes are. This is something that they hope to have ready for a future meeting.

5. Data Collection – Land Use – ESA

Michael Arnold stated that the team has been working on compiling all the different data sources and databases to establish the base maps that will be used for the noise exposure maps. Most recently, they have been able to collect property appraiser information. Noise sensitive land use types were noted as being residential, historic properties, places of worship, assisted living, schools, colleges, universities, libraries, hospitals and healthcare facilities, and daycares. While some areas on the existing conditions land use map are marked as commercial, they could also be mixed use which includes residential. The team will distribute what is currently being presented to the TAC for their review and feedback.

Jamie Robinson commented that when looking at the legend, environmentally protected properties have not been addressed. Michael Arnold responded that they are probably classified as open space but if necessary, they can include different classifications.

Robin Singer asked if there will be a category for transient lodging or hotels and consideration for residential mixed-use developments. Michael Arnold confirmed that the team will take this into consideration.

Danielle Hudson asked Michael Arnold if that task at hand was to nail confirm down what is classified within Naples. Michael responded that the team is trying to complete the base map and acknowledge some areas that are shown to be commercial but might also have a residential use. Danielle stated that she can take a look from her end to identify some of the information for Naples land use.

Joan Tobin asked what the difference between orange and yellow on the map is. Michael responded that orange is apartments or condos, while yellow is single family homes.

Jamie French asked Michael Arnold to reach out to us for updated map information.

Raymond Stricklen noted that moving forward, he assumes that the team is going to accommodate the trend in development and how it is moving toward retail and residential. He asked if the mixed-use area on 5th Avenue would be classified as predominantly residential or commercial. Michael Arnold responded that it would be typically classified as a mixed-use area. He also questioned whether there are any requirements being placed on those residential areas to protect them from noise. Robin Singer stated that developments have coordinated with the airport in the approval process to have some noise attenuation built into the construction. The City of Naples has also requested a disclaimer for property owners that says they understand where they live.

David Norgard asked if data of this sort, land use data, required for all permitting and zoning questions that go before The City? Robin Singer responded that noise overlays are checked in the permitting process and depending on where they fall within that, there may be additional processes that they have to go through depending on the use.

6. Noise Modeling

Michael Arnold stated that all information previously discussed will ultimately be put into the noise model. There will be an analysis that is going to generate contours, which will be overlaid on the land use maps that will be compared to the different land use types to determine compatibility.

Raymond Stricklen asked if there is a different departure profile used in AEDT that may not be represented at Naples Airport. Michael Arnold responded that o AEDT has a standard profile for each aircraft. ESA will be looking at the climb profiles for each aircraft.

7. Next Steps

Michael presented the recent and scheduled outreach activities. He noted that on March 25, there will be an Old Naples Association outreach presentation and also reinforced that TAC members will need to assist with outreach.

Andy Reed requested that the times and locations of meetings be distributed to the TAC as they are scheduled. Michael Arnold confirmed that this will be done.

Yvonne Garth wanted to make a note that coming out of this meeting, there are two requests for meetings. There is one from Jamie for the NE quadrant and one form Bruce for the 5th Avenue businesses. Autumn Ward added that Joan of the 3rd Street Merchants Association would also like a meeting.

Michael Arnold stated that there is a tentative meeting scheduled for January 2021, however nothing is confirmed as the team does not yet have approval on the FAA forecast. The goal is to have a complete draft of the NEM report and conduct public outreach, which the team would like to distribute to the TAC before going to the public. Final FAA review and acceptance is scheduled to take place in fall 2021.

Raymond Stricklen asked if there is a schedule for the NCP at this point. Michael Arnold responded that the Airport is still working through the funding process with the FAA. Dianne Terill added that the airport is preparing to submit a pre-application to the FAA for phase two of the study, which is the NCP phase. The deadline for this is November 16. Peter Green added that the study is being accomplished by two separate grants. They want to keep things on track, but did not anticipate COVID and the effects on aviation- especially forecasts. As far as specific questions, FAA would have to loop back to Crystal for the official information. The FAA will work to proceed with the grants and have a seamless transition between phases for the grants.

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no public comments.

G. ACTION ITEMS There were no action items at this time.

H. OLD BUSINESS

There was no old business at this time.

I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Next Meeting Date The next meeting was scheduled during TAC #3 for February 11, 2021 (TAC #4). A roll call vote was taken on the date for TAC #4. February 11 was chosen over February 14 in a 12-0 vote.

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no public comments.

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS – COMMITTEE MEMBERS

There were no additional TAC member comments.

L. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:04 p.m.

______Natalie Palomino Secretary

NOTE: Printed copies of all visual presentations and handouts are on file in the Executive Assistant’s Office.

Appendix G-4

TAC Meeting #4

April 13, 2021

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #4

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

AGENDA

Airport Office Building, 200 Aviation Drive North, Naples or By Registering via the Virtual Meeting Link Below

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:30 a.m.

Liaisons/Participants Commissioner Donna M. Messer – Naples Airport Authority Liaison City Councilor Gary Price – Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Peter Green – Federal Aviation Administration Liaison Joe Molsen – TRACON/RSW Liaison Stacey Nichols – Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Liaison Erica Martin – City of Naples Planning Department Liaison Jamie French – Collier County Growth Management Division Liaison Christopher A. Rozansky – Executive Director William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC – Authority Counsel Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting April 13, 2021 Page 2

Welcome. If you are attending in person and wish to address the Technical Advisory Committee regarding an item listed on the Agenda, please complete a Speaker Registration form and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to consideration of that item. If you are attending virtually, using the Zoom Meeting link provided above, please submit a Speaker Registration form and submit it to the moderator using the Raise Your Hand feature. We ask that speakers limit comments to 5 minutes and that large groups name a spokesperson whenever possible. All written, audio-visual, and other materials distributed to Committee members or staff during this meeting will become the property of NAA and will be a public record. Thank you for your interest and participation.

NOTICE

Actions of this committee are subject to the Florida Sunshine Law. Two or more Airport Authority Commissioners may be in attendance. Florida Statute 286.011 states, “any gathering, whether formal or casual, of two or more members of the same Board or commission to discuss some matter on which foreseeable action will be taken by the public Board or Commission must be conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law.”

A. ROLL CALL – ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (ESA)

1. Determine Committee Quorum

a. In person attendance – 25% or greater

b. Action required by majority of in-person members to allow virtual attendance

c. Committee Quorum – Majority of appointed committee members

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

1. Approval of November 5, 2020 Meeting Minutes

Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting April 13, 2021 Page 3

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Part 150 Study Presentation – ESA

a. Summary of TAC Meeting #3 b. Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast c. Baseline Operational Analysis

i. Runway Use ii. Fleet Mix iii. Stage Length

d. Baseline Land Use e. Noise Modeling f. Noise Comment Analyses g. Supplemental Analyses h. Recent Stakeholder Outreach i. Next Steps

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

G. ACTION ITEMS

H. OLD BUSINESS

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Technical Advisory Committee

Meeting #4

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – April 13, 2021 Part 150 Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting preliminary data – subject to change

Pledge Of Allegiance

preliminary data – subject to change

1 Presentation Materials Overview

• Summary of TAC #3 • Baseline Land Use • Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast • Noise Modeling • Baseline Operational Analysis • Noise Comment Analyses − Runway Use • Supplemental Analyses − Fleet Mix • Recent Stakeholder Outreach − Stage Length • Next Steps

Part 150 Studies Must Adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 Guidelines to be Accepted and Approved by FAA preliminary data – subject to change

Summary of TAC #3

preliminary data – subject to change

2 Summary of TAC #3

• Brief overview of the principles of noise impacts Pending final results for the • Discussion on aircraft activity forecast from October 10, following: 2020 • Baseline runway utilization • Results from runway use and fleet mix analysis using • Baseline fleet mix calendar year 2019 operational data • Activity forecast • Results from flight track analysis • Baseline land use

• Discussion of land use data collection and preliminary results

• Noise modeling overview

• Updates on Project Schedule and anticipated dates for the next TAC meeting

preliminary data – subject to change

Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast

preliminary data – subject to change

3 APF Amended Forecast Overview

• Overall 20-year forecast of annual operations (approved by the FAA on May 9, 2018) are no longer considered appropriate for use in the Part 150 Study. • Forecast memorandum (dated October 10, 2020) projected total operations and jet activity based on partial year 2020 data. • October 10, 2020 memorandum was amended on January 22, 2021 to reflect actual jet activity experienced in calendar year 2020. • Goal is to use the most current operational fleet mix to develop a reasonable estimate of noise exposure expected in 2021 and 2026.

FAA has approved the amended forecast developed January 22, 2021 for use in the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps

preliminary data – subject to change

Projected Aircraft Activity - October 10, 2020

• October 10, 2020 memorandum used Approved Annual and Jet Aircraft Operations – October 10, 2020 Memorandum partial year 2020 activity level to project a year’s worth of data. Annual Jet Annual Year • Jet activity expected to increase Operations Operations Share 2.5% each year for the duration of Estimate of Annual Total the Part 150 Study (5 years). 2020 100,600 34,200 34.0% Projected Activity 2021 101,900 35,100 34.4% 2026 108,700 39,700 36.5% Source: • ESA Analysis, 2020. Notes: • Includes 2020 jet activity through September 2020. October through December includes 2019 operations since these data were unavailable at the time of the October 10, 2020 memorandum.

preliminary data – subject to change

4 Projected Aircraft Activity - January 22, 2021

• Jet operations in CY 2020 were 1,340 Revised Jet Aircraft Operations for Developing Noise Exposure Maps higher than anticipated in the October 10, 2020 forecast memorandum. Annual Jet Annual Year • Jet operations are expected to Operations Operations Share continue to grow, fueled by the shift Estimate of Annual Total from commercial to private air travel. 2020 97,284 35,540 36.5% • Total jet activity is still expected to increase 2.5% each year for the Projected Activity duration of the Part 150 Study (5 2021 101,900 36,400 35.7% years). 2026 108,700 41,200 37.9% Source: • ESA Analysis, 2021. Notes: • Includes CY 2020 operations at APF.

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Operational Analysis

preliminary data – subject to change

5 Naples Airport Runway Use

Perform QA/QC on Review aircraft Review and 'clean' Organize data final runway use operational data from data to remove according to runway, information before Vector Airport incomplete or time of day, aircraft performing noise Systems for CY 2020. inaccurate category, and/or modeling. information. arrivals/departures.

Since the last TAC meeting, the Noise Study Team has updated and finalized the runway use numbers to reflect operations in CY 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

Runway Use – All Fixed Wing Aircraft

Legend DAY: 8.1% DAY: 54.8% NIGHT: 8.9% NIGHT: 63.0% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 50.4% DAY: 8.5% NIGHT: 53.3% NIGHT: 8.9%

preliminary data – subject to change

6 Runway Use – All Fixed Wing Aircraft

Legend DAY: 4.6% DAY: 36.7% NIGHT: 6.6% NIGHT: 33.6% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 32.2% DAY: 4.8% NIGHT: 21.4% NIGHT: 4.2%

preliminary data – subject to change

Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix

• Calendar Year 2020 data from Vector Airport Systems was reviewed to determine the baseline fleet mix of aircraft in operation at APF. • Modeling fleet mix from 2020 data resulted in 67 different AEDT noise profile classifications. • AEDT noise profile classifications include % % % multiple types of aircraft.

preliminary data – subject to change

7 Naples Airport Jet Fleet Mix

Jet Fleet Mix Business Jet Total Examples Category Cessna 510, Embraer 450/500, Eclipse 500, CIRRUS SF50, SJ-30, Honda HA-420 Hondajet, VLJ 7.1% Raytheon Premier I, Beechjet 400 Cessna 550/551, Raytheon Premier I, Embraer 505/550, Beechjet 400, Pilatus PC-24, Learjet Light 39.0% 31/35/45/50/55/60, Hawker 700/800/850/900/1000, Cessna 500/501/525, Cessna 525C CitationJet Cessna 560 Citation XLS, Cessna 560 Citation V, Israel IAI-1125 Astra, Gulfstream, G100/150/280, Midsize 15.6% Cessna 560 Citation V, Falcon 20 Cessna 680/680A/700, Cessna 750, Falcon 2000, Hawker 4000, Gulfstream G200, Cessna 650 Super-Mid 18.5% Citation III Bombardier Challenger 300/350/600/601, Gulfstream GIV, G300/350/400, Falcon 7X, Falcon Large 17.6% 50/900, Gulfstream GV, G500/550, Embraer 135, Gulfstream II-B, Bombardier CRJ-700 Bombardier Global Express, Gulfstream GV, G650, Bombardier Global 5000 Business, Embraer LR 2.1% 190

Other 0.1% L-39 Albatros

Source: • ESA Analysis, 2021. Notes: • Calendar year 2020 data obtained from Vector Airport Systems. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Does not include touch and go/pattern activity. VLJ = “Very Light Jet.” LR = “Long Range.”

preliminary data – subject to change

Stage Length

• Stage length is the distance an airplane flies directly from one airport to another. • The stage length determines the gross takeoff weight assigned to each aircraft type. • The aircraft weight serves as the basis for determining the appropriate departure climb altitude and thrust profiles used for modeling purposes. • For most general aviation aircraft including business jets, AEDT defaults to a stage length of 1 and maximum takeoff weight even though they are traveling more than 500 miles. − Maximum takeoff weight means the climb performance for these aircraft is modeled as if these aircraft are fully loaded.

preliminary data – subject to change

8 Stage Length – Modeled vs. Actual

Departure Stage Length of 2020 Operations Stage Departure Modeled Stage Length Actual Stage Length Length Route Length Category (nautical miles) Jet Turboprop Piston Helicopter Jet Turboprop Piston Helicopter

1 0 - 500 95.9% 100% 100% 100% 34.8% 60.6% 96.7% 100% 2 501 – 1,000 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% 33.1% 3.1% 0.0% 3 1,001 - 1,500 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 6.1% 0.1% 0.0% 4 1,501 - 2,500 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 5 2,501 - 3,500 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6 3,501 - 4,500 0.01% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.01% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Source: • Environmental Science Associates, 2021. Notes: • Most GA aircraft default to stage length 1 which is the maximum takeoff weight in AEDT regardless of distance flown. Values may not add to 100% due to rounding. No aircraft were modeled for a stage length of 5 and greater than 6.

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Land Use

preliminary data – subject to change

9 Land Use Data Coordination

• The land use database for the baseline NEMs was developed by coordinating with the Collier County Appraiser's office. • The County Appraiser's office provided several data sources that were used to Collier County County Appraiser create a comprehensive database of land • Hospitals • Parcel Data use in areas surrounding APF. • City Boundaries • Places of Worship • The Study Team has also been active in • Libraries • Nursing Homes coordinating with the City of Naples • Schools Planning Department. • Roadways • Park locations

preliminary data – subject to change

Draft Land Use – Existing Conditions (2021)

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

preliminary data – subject to change

10 Noise Modeling

preliminary data – subject to change

Noise Modeling

Modeling Inputs Modeling Program

preliminary data – subject to change

11 Historical Noise Exposure Maps

preliminary data – subject to change

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure – 2021

Notes: • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change

12 Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure with DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Notes: • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure – 2021 and Master Plan Update – 2017 DNL 60 Contours

Notes: • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change

13 Draft Noise Exposure Map – 2021

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change

Draft Noise Exposure with DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change

14 Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Runway End 14 Runway End 23

Notes: • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only. Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

preliminary data – subject to change

Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Runway End 5 Runway End 32

Notes: • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only. Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

preliminary data – subject to change

15 Noise Comment Analyses

preliminary data – subject to change

2020 Noise Comments Summary

363 +313% +90* compared New households Total Comments to 2019 commented in received in 2020 104* 2020 Total households commented in 2020 3.5 Average comments Sunday filed per household February* Day when most comments were made Month with the most 37 (36%) 1 comments 6 AM Households made more Median comments Time when most than 1 comment in 2020 filed per household comments were reported *20 households have an unknown address location and are considered distinct households *Part 150 Kick-off meetings held in February 2020. making new comments in 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

16 Noise Comment Analysis Noise Comments Number of Noise Number of Distinct Year • Three households represent 30% of Comments Households the total comments received between 2012 203 71 2012 through 2020. 2013 764 108 2014 265 74 • Average number of comments filed 2015 138 65 per household is over 3.4 between 2016 138 65 2012 and 2020. 2017 153 71 • Large increase (>300%) in the 2018 92 46 number of noise comments filed in 2019 116 50 2020 363 104 2020 when compared to 2019. Total 2,232 654 − Part 150 Kick-off Meetings held in Source: • Data represents calendar year 2012 through 2020. February 2020. Notes: • 48 comments received between January 2012 to December 2020 did not have address locations and are classified as “Unknown” or “N/A.” Unknown locations were treated as distinct households.

preliminary data – subject to change

Comments Since 2018 by Month

• 571 overall comments (248 annual average). − 2018 Comments: 92 − 2019 Comments: 116 − 2020 Comments: 363 • Increase in comments driven primarily by increases in 4 months. − February − March − May − December • Each of these four months individually have had more comments than any month since the beginning of 2018.

Part 150 Kick-off Meetings preliminary data – subject to change

17 Comments Since 2012

2,232 overall 2013 (764) and comments (248 annual 2020 (363) were average) were years with highest received between noise comment 2012 through 2020 counts Since 2012, comments are generally concentrated around airport, but are sometimes as far away as 25 miles

preliminary data – subject to change

Types of Comments Since 2012

• A single comment received by NAA is categorized based on information received from commenter. • The most frequent comment type received by NAA includes: − Too loud, too frequent, too low, disturbed sleep, too early, and too late. • Quality of life, pattern training, engine run-up, feared crash, and turn too early/late were the least used comment types between 2012 and 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

18 2020 Comments by Neighborhood

• Six Locations had 10 or more comments in 2020 • A single residence made 94 comments • Comments from Grey Oaks, Lakewood, Old Naples, Park Shore, and Wyndemere make up 78% of all 2020 comments • Old Naples is the neighborhood with the most comments in 2020 (55% of all comments) • Grey Oaks, Lakewood, and Park Shore had a total of 6 addresses while Old Naples and Wyndemere had >10 addresses each.

preliminary data – subject to change

Supplemental Analyses

preliminary data – subject to change

19 CY 2019 Jet Aircraft Departures Population Study

• As a part of the NEMs, NAA plans to perform a population study of areas surrounding APF for the Existing (2021) and Future (2026) Condition.

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • Draft 2021 NEM Contours. • Flight track density maps for jet aircraft departures – CY 2019. • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County as a threshold of significance—this is for informational purposes only. preliminary data – subject to change

CY 2019 Jet Aircraft Arrivals Population Study

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • Draft 2021 NEM Contours. • Flight track density maps for jet aircraft arrivals – CY 2019. • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County as a threshold of significance—this is for informational purposes only. preliminary data – subject to change

20 Supplemental Noise Analyses

• To help inform the NCP, we may 2016 – 2019 Monthly Takeoff and Landings conduct a seasonal analysis and/or single event analysis to gain additional insights into the variations in noise exposure due to seasonal peaks in travel.

Seasonal variations in noise exposure are often not well represented in the average conditions reflected in DNL contours. Itinerant Local

preliminary data – subject to change

Supplemental Noise Metrics

• Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) is the maximum, or peak, sound level during a noise event. • Sound Exposure Level (SEL) is a time integrated measure, expressed in decibels, of the sound energy of a single noise event at a reference duration of one second. • Equivalent Noise Level (Leq) is the “energy” average noise level during the time period of the sample. • Number Above (N-level or Count Above) is the total number of aircraft sound events that exceeded a specified sound level threshold. • Time Above noise metric measures the total time or percentage of time that the A-weighted aircraft noise level exceeds an indicated level.

preliminary data – subject to change

21 Recent Stakeholder Outreach

preliminary data – subject to change

Recent and Scheduled Outreach Activities

Recent Outreach • February 9. 2021 – Moorings Property Owner’s Association • February 19, 202 – Bayfront Condo Association • February 22, 2021 – Naples Area Board of REALTORS • March 15, 2021 – Northeast Quadrant Communities • April 7, 2021 – Mariner’s Cove Upcoming Outreach • April 22, 2021 – Old Naples Association • May 4, 2021 – Noise Compatibility Committee Meeting • May 26, 2021 – Greater Naples Leadership • Week of May 24, 2021 – Public Open House

preliminary data – subject to change

22 Next Steps

preliminary data – subject to change

Next Steps and Timeline of APF NEMs (Phase 1)

Winter 2020 Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Fall 2021 • Finalize modeling • Complete Draft • Complete Final • FAA Acceptance of assumptions NEM Report and Draft NEM Report NEM Report • Conduct noise Conduct Public • FAA Completes modeling Outreach Initial Review • Develop Noise • Respond to • Complete Final Exposure Maps Comments on NEM Report Draft NEM Report

preliminary data – subject to change

23 Next Steps and Timeline of APF Part 150 Study Phase 2: Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)

Spring 2021 Summer/Fall 2021 Winter 2021/2022 Spring 2022 • Solicit input at • Supplemental • Complete Draft • Complete Final NEM Public analyses NCP Report and NCP Report and Open House • Initiate NCP (Phase release for Public submit to FAA for 2) Comment review and • Analyze measures • Conduct Public findings to reduce noise Workshop and exposure Public Hearing

preliminary data – subject to change

Future Meetings

• TAC Meeting #5 (Tentative) TBD 2021

• TAC Meeting #6 (Tentative) TBD 2021

• Public Open House Week of May 24th, 2021

• Reminder notices will be sent out in advance of each meeting

All TAC Materials will be posted on the Project Website following the meeting at: https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/

preliminary data – subject to change

24 Questions

preliminary data – subject to change

Appendix G-5

NCC Meeting #1

January 30, 2020

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #1

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Notice of Regular Meeting

FINAL AGENDA

Airport Office Building 200 Aviation Drive North, 2nd Floor Naples, FL 34102

Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:00 a.m.

Commissioner Donna M. Messer – NAA Commissioner and Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Cliff Holland – Chair, Noise Compatibility Committee and City at Large Chris Auron – Vice Chair, Noise Compatibility Committee and Northwest Quadrant Noise Compatibility Committee Members – R. Bruce Byerly (Active Pilot), Harvey Cohen (County at Large), Ernest W. Linneman (Southwest Quadrant), Justin E. Lobb (Collier County), John Mastrocinque (Southeast Quadrant), Vice Mayor Gary Price (City Council), Russell Tuff (Northeast Quadrant) Executive Director: Christopher A. Rozansky Authority Attorney: William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Welcome. If you wish to address the Noise Compatibility Committee regarding an item listed on the Agenda, please complete a Speaker Registration form (available at the rear of the room) and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to consideration of that item. We ask that speakers limit comments to 5 minutes and that large groups name a spokesperson whenever possible. All written, audio-visual, and other materials distributed to Committee members or staff during this meeting will become the property of NAA and will be a public record. Thank you for your interest and participation.

NOTICE

Formal action may be taken on any item listed on the Agenda below, or added to the Agenda before or during the meeting, or discussed during the meeting without being added to the Agenda. Also, the sequence of items may be changed as the meeting progresses. Any person who decides to appeal a recommendation made by the NCC with respect to any matter considered at this meeting may do so at the next Regular City of Naples Airport Authority Board Meeting.

Two or more Airport Authority Commissioners may be in attendance. Florida Statute 286.011 states, “any gathering, whether formal or casual, of two or more members of the same Board or commission to discuss some matter on which foreseeable action will be taken by the public Board or Commission must be conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law.”

Noise Compatibility Committee Notice of Regular Meeting – Final Agenda January 30, 2020 Page 2

A. ROLL CALL - Chair

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chair

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

1. Approve October 31, 2019 Committee Minutes

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Part 150 Noise Study Overview - Environmental Science Associates

2. 2019 Aircraft Operations Analysis - Environmental Science Associates

3. Update from Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison – Donna M. Messer

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

G. ACTION ITEMS

1. Approval of 2019 Annual Report

H. OLD BUSINESS

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #1

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – January 30, 2020 Part 150 Study NCC Briefing

Agenda

• Master Plan Status and Key Considerations • Part 150 Study Overview • FAQs • Preliminary Study Schedule • Questions

1 SHORT-TERM (2020-2024) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 4

2 INTERMEDIATE-TERM (2025-2029) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 5

Master Plan Annual Aircraft Operations

FY2019 Actual 112,800

3 Key Noise Considerations Relative to Master Plan

• There are no planned runway improvements that will affect aircraft climb performance or departure profiles • There are no planned modifications to threshold locations that will affect approach profiles • The master plan activity forecast is outdated and not appropriate for use in evaluating future noise conditions

Part 150 Study Overview

4 Part 150 Study Overview

• Issued in response to provisions contained in the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979

• Establishes the methodology to be followed when preparing aircraft noise exposure maps and developing airport/airport environs land use compatibility programs

• Part 150 studies are voluntary, but…

• Part 150 studies must adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 guidelines to be considered and accepted and approved by FAA

Part 150 History at APF

The 14 CFR Part 150 process is the Airport Sponsor’s mechanism to improve the compatibility between the Airport and surrounding communities

5 Goals and Objectives

Key Issues: • NAA has strong history of industry noise leadership but a desire to examine whether any additional reasonable noise mitigation strategies can be implemented • Jet activity has increased and will continue to grow • Training activity is on rebound • Seasonal variations are masked by DNL • APF noise exposure has generally decreased over time, but community concerns about aircraft noise continue

Goals and Objectives Opportunities • Brings stakeholders to the table • Education • Provides decision making structure • Can strengthen community relationships

Challenges • Seasonal variations in noise exposure are often not reflected in the DNL contours • Regulatory process limits what can be approved

6 Part 150 Study Overview

Regulatory Framework

Part 150 Study Overview

Who Can Regulate Airport Noise?

7 Part 150 Study Overview

Analyze, Evaluate, Educate

• Determine existing and future noise conditions in the vicinity of an airport

• Identify incompatible uses

• Educate communities on the Federal process and what can and cannot be done to address aircraft noise concerns

Part 150 Study Overview

8 Part 150 Study Overview

(NEMs) (NCP)

FAQs

9 Kickoff Public Workshops

1 Baker Park Sugden-Gomez Center 100 Riverside Circle February 11, 2020 Naples FL 34102 2 5:00 – 7:00 pm

Public Website

10 Questions?

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #1

Meeting Summary

Appendix G-6

NCC Meeting #2

June 25, 2020

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #2

Meeting Agenda

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NCC meeting will be held via Zoom. The public is invited to join the webinar by registering in advance at the following link:

https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_uDXbvfgUSuqnX5TjUmoWnw

In addition, if you wish to address the NCC, please select the option to speak on the registration form at the link above. We ask that speakers limit comments to 5 minutes.

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #2

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – June 25th 2020 Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Meeting Draft for deliberation purposes only

Agenda Item E.2

FAA Report to Congress Reaffirming Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL) as Noise Metric

Draft for deliberation purposes only

1 FAA Report to Congress

• Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) report to Congress included an evaluation of alternative noise metrics as directed by Senate Appropriations Report 116-109 for fiscal year 2019 and the requirements of Section 188 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018.

− In 1992, Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) concluded that Day Night Level (DNL) is the recommended metric and should continue to be used as the primary metric for aircraft noise exposure

− In 2018, the Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN) has also reaffirmed the recommendation made by FICON.

The FAA reaffirms that the DNL metric is to be used for purposes of determining an individual’s cumulative noise exposure, for land use compatibility under 14 CFR part 150, and for assessing the significance of predicted noise impacts under NEPA

Draft for deliberation purposes only

DNL Overview

• 24-hour time weighted energy average noise level based on A-weighted decibels (dBA) • Noise occurring between 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. is adjusted by 10 dB to account for the higher sensitivity to noise during nighttime hours • FAA requires the use of DNL for airport noise assessments • Average Annual Day aircraft noise exposure is calculated over a broad area and then depicted using contour lines of equal noise levels • DNL is the standard noise metric used for all FAA Part 150 studies of aviation noise exposure in airport communities

Draft for deliberation purposes only

2 Agenda Item E.3

Florida Metroplex Project Update

Draft for deliberation purposes only

FAA South-Central Florida Metroplex EA Update

• Involved 52 airports including RSW and APF when initiated in 2012 • Revised to 21 airports in 2016/17 (RSW and APF no longer included) • Intent - improve efficiency of airspace system through more precise and predictable routing of aircraft • Likely to have minimal effect on APF • Comment Period Closes July 10, 2020 http://metroplexenvironmental.com/fl_metroplex/fl_docs.html

Draft for deliberation purposes only

3 Agenda Item E.4

Part 150 Noise Study Update and Overview of Public Workshop Comments and Themes

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Part 150 Study Status Update

Completed • Kickoff Open House and comment review • Flight profile analysis

In Process • Flight tracks and runway use • Fleet mix analysis • Land use base mapping

Initiating • Operational Forecasts • Analyzing Flight Track Data

Draft for deliberation purposes only

4 Open House Attendance

• NAA held three Open Houses in February to answer questions on the Part 150 Study and gather feedback from the Naples community on any airport noise-related concerns.

February 11, 2020 February 12, 2020 February 12, 2020 5-7 pm 9:30-11:30 am 6-8 pm

Baker Park Moorings Lorenzo Walker Sugden- Presbyterian Technical Gomez Center Church College

26 Attendees 11 Attendees 16 Attendees

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Overview of Open House Comments

Methodology • Attendees were encouraged to provide Comment Airport Curfew feedback and leave comments on noise-related issues. Aircraft Altitude

• The Open House resulted in comments from Aircraft Flight attendees that showed ten overarching themes: Paths Air Quality 1. Methodology 6. Airport Curfew Comment 7. Aircraft Flight Paths 2. Quality of Life Land use 8. Aircraft Altitude 3. Public Outreach 9. Air Quality Noise 4. Noise Quality of life 10. General Question Public Outreach 5. Land Use General Question

NOTE: Results only include comments received during comment period. Draft for deliberation purposes only

5 Top Five Open House Comment Themes

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Methodology Comment Other Open House Comments “Flights crossing Old Naples are consistently crossing at a lower than necessary altitude which Air Quality Quality of Life causes noise impacts—will the “Noise level affects the ability to Part 150 Study document actual “Fumes from planes can be enjoy the outdoors and impacts historical flight path altitudes?” smelled.” quality of life.” “There is also soot from the aircraft exhaust that has been noticed.” Public Outreach Methodology Comment “Suggest additional outreach because Land Use “Noise impacts are not directly some people affected by noise may not over 5th Avenue in Old Naples— “Relocate the airport to a more be aware of the workshops.” they are spread throughout the rural area because it could sector—Will the study look at the increase revenue and generate actual flight paths and the actual jobs.” Aircraft Flight Paths impacted populations vs. the “Perhaps moving airport to “There was a change for flight paths to model’s predictions?” location that is out of town?” make right turns only from 23—why was this change made?”

Draft for deliberation purposes only

6 Agenda Item E.5

Airspace Operational Overview

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Density

Jet Arrivals All Runways Jet Departures All Runways

NOTE: Figures represent aircraft density in Calendar Year (CY) 2019. Draft for deliberation purposes only

7 Naples Airport Aircraft Density

Jet Arrivals All Runways Jet Departures All Runways

NOTE: Figures represent aircraft density in Calendar Year (CY) 2019. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 05 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

8 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 05 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 23 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

9 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 23 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 14 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

10 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 14 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 32 Jet Departures

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

11 Naples Airport Aircraft Activity - Runway 32 Jet Arrivals

Aircraft Density Aircraft Altitude

3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

NOTE: Aircraft density is represented in CY 2019. Aircraft altitude is represented from October 2019 to May 2020. Draft for deliberation purposes only

Naples Airport Aircraft Analysis – Preliminary Runway Utilization

Draft for deliberation purposes only

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #2

Meeting Summary

Appendix G-7

NCC Meeting #3

October 29, 2020

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #3

Meeting Agenda

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #3

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – October 29, 2020 Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Meeting

Agenda Item F.1

US GAO Report to Congress on a Potential Mandated Transition to Quieter Airplanes

1 GAO Report to Congress on Potential Mandated Transition to Quieter Airplanes – Commercial Fleet

• United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report to Congress in August 2020 which addressed a provision in the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. • GAO indicated the following:

− Based on January 2020 data, approximately 96% of current large commercial aircraft meet stage 4 or 5 standards

− A stage 3 phase-out requiring recertifying those aircraft that meet stage 4 or 5 would be costly for operators and manufacturers with little reduction in noise. • The GAO report does not include accelerated fleet retirement resulting from COVID-19.

Given the current commercial fleet makeup, the cost of transition, the limited noise benefits that would result, and the further accelerated retirement of aircraft resulting from COVID-19, GAO’s report stated that it appears that there is little basis for a mandated transition.

GAO Report to Congress on Potential Mandated Transition to Quieter Airplanes – GA Fleet

• GAO indicates that 73 percent of the jet airplanes in the GA fleet are able to meet the more stringent stage 4 or 5 standards, according to manufacturers’ data, and 77 percent of those have already been certified or recertified to the more stringent levels • GAO notes that while commercial aircraft have a useful life of approximately 25-40 years, the lower utilization of GA aircraft can result in a considerably longer useful life. • The stage 2 phase-out for jet aircraft weighing less than 75,000 lbs was implemented on December 31, 2015. • New aircraft weighing less than 55,000 kg or 121,254 lbs are required to comply with stage 5 standards beginning December 31, 2020. • There are limited, if any, existing technologies to convert a stage 3 aircraft to meet the more stringent standards.

2 Agenda Item F.2

Aviation Trends and Challenges COVID-19

Change in Activity at US Towered Airports

• 76.4% through September 2020 vs. 2019 • GA has fared far better than air carrier − Air transport that avoids commercial airlines − Flight training − Socially distant recreation during lockdown • September 2020 – 78.5% of September 2019 operations

3 Change in Activity at Florida’s 44 Towered Airports

• 80.0% through September 2020 vs. 2019 • Similar trends across U.S. with a few exceptions • Strong GA/Air Taxi rebound in May/June • YTD FL vs. US − Air Carrier – 62.8% vs. 62.3% − Air Taxi – 75.5% vs. 66.9% − GA Itinerant – 87.2% vs. 83.8% − GA Local – 85.3% vs. 90.5%

Change in Activity at Florida’s 44 Towered Airports

• September 2020 − Overall – 82.6% of 2019 operations − 15 airports exceeding 2019 levels − 30 of 44 airports above 80% of 2019 activity levels − Air carrier operations generally trending below YTD average at 53.7%

4 How are Communities Changing during COVID-19?

• Work from home (or live at work!)

− Shift in population distribution during daytime hours (work and school)

− Shift in location of noise sensitive activities (virtual office and school meetings) • Potential trends to watch

− Office building conversions to residential

− Expansion of “mixed use”

− Relocation from urban areas to suburban areas

Understand that Community Members may be Overwhelmed

• COVID-19 concerns • Home schooling/work from home • Job market and economy • Upcoming election • Hurricanes and other natural disasters

Initial indication is that noise complaints are likely to rebound at a faster rate than activity

5 Agenda Item F.3

Part 150 Noise Study Update

APF Forecast Overview

• Overall 20-year forecast of annual operations (approved by the FAA on May 9, 2018) are no longer considered appropriate for use in the Part 150 Study • Forecast memorandum (dated October 10, 2020) documents: − past trends at APF resulting from other shock events − activity that occurred prior to the pandemic − level of operations that have been recorded through September 2020 • Goal is to develop a reasonable estimate of the activity expected in 2021 and 2026 for use in developing the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps • Includes results from interviews with more than 100 aircraft operators and passengers at APF

FAA is currently reviewing the forecast memo developed for APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps

6 Aircraft Operations During COVID-19

• Recovery at APF has been led by Comparison of Month 2019 2020 growth in air taxi operations and an 2020 to 2019 increase in the share of general January 10,849 11,612 7.00% aviation itinerant activity February 11,586 10,848 -6.40% • 34% of aircraft activity (through March 11,488 10,671 -7.10% September 2020) are by Jet Aircraft April 10,108 5,089 -49.70% compared to 30.9% in 2019 May 9,562 7,288 -23.80% • Quantity of Jet A fuel sold (through June 6,825 6,933 1.60% September 2020) was 2.6% higher July 6,871 6,351 -7.60% August 6,920 5,727 -17.20% than the same period in 2019 September 6,992 5,620 -19.60% Total Operations 81,201 70,139 -13.60% thru September SOURCE: 1. FAA OPSNET database and ESA analysis, 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

2020 Aircraft Operator and Passenger Interviews

• More consumers are considering and using private aircraft as an option to travel to/from Naples. • 81% of the passengers interviewed own property, were looking to buy property, or had a personal connection to property in the Naples area. • Most of the fractional, charter, and aircraft management companies that have a presence or frequently utilize APF stated that business was significantly better this summer than last year. − They also anticipate a stronger than typical late summer, fall, and winter this year. • Some operators and pilots believe that a portion of their newer passengers will not continue to fly private aircraft once the COVID-19 pandemic is under control. • Increase in leisure travel on private aircraft under the current conditions. − Most operators believe private aircraft business travel will pick up as travel restrictions are relaxed

7 Projected Aircraft Activity

Activity through the end of 2020 is • Annual 2019 FAA anticipated to be similar to 2019 Year Difference Operations TAF1 • Given the year to date activity and strong GA activity, it is realistic that the APF will Estimate of Annual Total continue to recover from the COVID-19 2 impacts 2020 100,600 110,950 -9.30% • For evaluating noise impacts, jet activity is Projected Activity expected to increase 2.5% each year from 2021 101,900 111,327 -8.5% the current estimate of 34.0% of total 2026 108,700 113,241 -4.0% activity SOURCE: 1. Issued January 2020 with data based on FAA fiscal year which ends September 30th. − 34,200 operations in 2020 2. Includes 2019 aircraft activity data for months October through December. − 39,700 jet operations by 2026

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Condition Arrival Runway Use

preliminary data – subject to change

8 Baseline Condition Departure Runway Use

preliminary data – subject to change

Baseline Condition Runway Use – All Aircraft

preliminary data – subject to change

9 Shift in Approach to Planned Community Outreach

COVID-19 has forced ESA and NAA to re-think how we engage the Naples community. Small Community Meetings Community Retail Style Outreach

Small community meetings with groups Retail style community events (farmers market, DESCRIPTION of ~10 people. festival, etc.) where individuals could stop and ask questions.

To conduct targeted community outreach To increase awareness, gain feedback, and help PURPOSE in a small, personal setting with inform the broader Naples community that they interested parties and receive feedback. could be affected by project recommendations.

Coordination meetings would be no Events would consist of an 8 hour day when DURATION more than 2 hours in length. including setup, staffing and breakdown.

Virtual presentations and meetings with Community video and outreach NEW APPROACH key stakeholders in the Naples materials that provide more information community. on the Part 150 Study.

Recent and Scheduled Outreach Activities

Recent Outreach • August 27, 2020 – Moorings Park Grande Lake Board Member Meeting • September 14, 2020 – City Council Workshop Meeting • October 16, 2020 – Naples Pelican Bay Rotary Upcoming Outreach • November 4, 2020 – Youth Leadership Collier • November 4, 2020 – Lunch and Learn with Naples Board of Realtors (NABOR) • November 10, 2020 – Coquina Sands Association outreach presentation • March 25, 2021 – Old Naples Association outreach presentation Other activities • Development of a short video that can be sent to the HOA president’s councils and community groups to promote awareness of the study

10 Future Schedule*

*Note: Schedule is subject to approval of forecasts by the FAA

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #3

Meeting Summary

Appendix G-8

NCC Meeting #4

January 28, 2021

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #4

Meeting Agenda

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Notice of Regular Meeting

Please note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NCC meeting will be a hybrid meeting whereby the public is invited to participate in person or via Zoom. To join the webinar via Zoom, please register in advance at the following link: https://esassoc.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_wTZY8opbSSCV8zz1u5uY2A

AGENDA

Airport Office Building, 200 Aviation Drive North, Naples or By Registering via the Virtual Meeting Link Above Thursday, January 28, 2021 9:00 a.m.

Commissioner Donna M. Messer – NAA Commissioner and Noise Compatibility and Technical Advisory Committee Liaison Cliff Holland – Chair, Noise Compatibility Committee and City at Large Chris Auron – Vice Chair, Noise Compatibility Committee and Northwest Quadrant Noise Compatibility Committee Members – R. Bruce Byerly (Active Pilot), Harvey Cohen (County at Large), Ernest W. Linneman (Southwest Quadrant), Andrew Bennett (Collier County), Richard Krawczun (Southeast Quadrant), City Councilor Gary Price (City Council), Russell Tuff (Northeast Quadrant) Executive Director: Christopher A. Rozansky Authority Attorney: William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

NOTICE

Formal action may be taken on any item listed on the Agenda below, or added to the Agenda before or during the meeting, or discussed during the meeting without being added to the Agenda. Also, the sequence of items may be changed as the meeting progresses. Any person who decides to appeal a recommendation made by the NCC with respect to any matter considered at this meeting may do so at the next Regular City of Naples Airport Authority Board Meeting.

A. ROLL CALL - Chair

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Chair

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

1. Approve October 29, 2020 Committee Minutes

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Welcome New Collier County Representative Member

2. Presentations by ESA

a. FAA/MIT Report to Congress on Aircraft Departure and Arrival Procedure Noise b. FAA Neighborhood Environmental Survey c. Jet Aircraft Profile Analysis d. Noise Comment Summary e. Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis f. 2019 Jet Curfew Compliance Summary g. Runway Use Review

3. Update from Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison – Donna M. Messer

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

G. ACTION ITEMS

1. Noise Compatibility Committee 2020 Annual Report

H. OLD BUSINESS

1. Website Analytic Reports

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Outreach 2. Next Meeting Date

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Noise Compatibility Committee

Meeting #4

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport – January 28, 2021 Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Meeting

FAA/MIT Report to Congress on Aircraft Departure and Arrival Procedure Noise

1 FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Section 179: Airport Noise Mitigation and Safety Study (June 2020, issued December 23, 2020)

• MIT used NASA’s Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP) to determine whether changes in aircraft arrival or departure speed are a viable noise mitigation technique. • Arrivals - Delaying the deceleration of arriving aircraft could reduce noise by 4-8 dB in areas between 10 and 25 miles of the airports with no change within 10 miles. • Departures – Use of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) noise abatement departure procedures (NADP) 1 (close-in) and 2 (distant) provide a benefit of 0.4 to 1.2 dBA. • Departures - Reducing climb speed to maintain the aircraft at the minimum safe airspeed with flaps up until 10,000 feet provides a benefit of less than 0.5 dBA.

The Study concludes that a delay in arrival aircraft deceleration may provide a noticeable reduction in noise at some locations further from the airport, but because of the dominance of engine noise, changes in departure speed do not appear to provide an appreciable noise benefit.

Summary of the FAA’s Analysis of the Neighborhood Environmental Survey (DOT/FAA/TC-21/4)

2 Analysis of the Neighborhood Environmental Survey

• January 13 - FAA released the findings of its long-awaited Neighborhood Environmental Survey (NES). − A multi-year research effort to quantify the impacts of aircraft noise exposure on communities around commercial service airports in the U.S. − Conducted to improve the FAA’s understanding of community annoyance with aircraft noise and to help determine if the FAA needs to update its 40-year-old aircraft noise policy. • The survey included 10,000 people near 20 airports across the U.S. SOURCE: Figure 3-1 of NES Report

preliminary data – subject to change

Analysis of the Neighborhood Environmental Survey • NES results show more people are “highly annoyed” at a given noise exposure level compared to historical data. − ~66% of respondents were highly annoyed at 65 DNL. − ~20% of respondents were highly annoyed at 50 DNL. • Does not change FAA noise policy.

• Does not change Part 150 SOURCE: Figure 8-4 of NES Report methodology. NOTES: − FICON = Federal Interagency Commission on Noise − TNO = Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research − ISO = International Organization for Standardization

preliminary data – subject to change

3 FAA is Requesting Feedback on Further Noise Research to Inform Future Noise Policy ! Federal Register FAA is requesting comments in three areas: Notice: 1. Effects of Aircraft Noise on Individuals and Communities; http://federalregister.gov/ 2. Noise Modeling, Noise Metrics, and Environmental Data d/2021-00564 Visualization; and 3. Reduction, Abatement, and Mitigation of Aviation Noise. Full text: https://www.faa.gov/regul FAA also requests input on the factors that may be ations_policies/policy_gu • idance/noise/survey/ contributing to the increase in annoyance shown in the survey results. ! Comments due: March 15, 2021 (ref. Docket Number FAA-2021-0037)

preliminary data – subject to change

Aircraft Profile Analysis

4 Aircraft Profile Analysis (October 2019 – May 2020)

• Additional analysis of the arrival The highest density of aircraft and departure profiles were altitudes are depicted in dark completed to better understand blue, which shows the most frequent altitude of how aircraft altitudes vary at arriving/departing aircraft. different locations along the arrival and departure paths.

X-axis is the distance from the runway end. When an aircraft is further away, the altitude is generally higher (depicted on the y-axis).

preliminary data – subject to change

8.3% > 2,500 ft 35.4% > 2,000 ft 3.3% > 2,000 ft 93.7% > 1,500 ft 55.6% > 1,500 ft 96.6% > 1,000 ft 2.1% > 1,500 ft 36.4% > 1,000 ft 95.3% > 500 ft

5 3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

From the shoreline in, 96.5% of all aircraft are at or above the 3° Approach Glide Slope*

From the shoreline in, 49% of all aircraft are at or above the 3.5° Approach Glide Slope*

*These calculations include a 100 foot buffer to account for any flight path tracking anomalies

2.9% > 2,500 ft 20.0% > 2,000 ft 0.8% > 2,000 ft 88.0% > 1,500 ft 41.7% > 1,500 ft 0.9% > 1,500 ft 93.9% > 1,000 ft 28.4% > 1,000 ft 94.5% > 500 ft

6 3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

From 15,000 feet in, 96.2% of all aircraft are at or above the 3° Approach Glide Slope*

From 15,000 feet in, 35.9% of all aircraft are at or above the 3.5° Approach Glide Slope*

*These calculations include a 100 foot buffer to account for any flight path tracking anomalies

8.6% > 2,500 ft 38.0% > 2,000 ft 5.4% > 2,000 ft 91.9% > 1,500 ft 57.1% > 1,500 ft 4.2% > 1,500 ft 96.8% > 1,000 ft 39.4% > 1,000 ft 97.3% > 500 ft

7 3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

From the shoreline in, 83% of all aircraft are at or above the 3° Approach Glide Slope*

From the shoreline in, 43% of all aircraft are at or above the 3.5° Approach Glide Slope*

*These calculations include a 100 foot buffer to account for any flight path tracking anomalies

7.8% > 2,500 ft 26.0% > 2,000 ft 1.2% > 2,000 ft 90.9% > 1,500 ft 55.3% > 1,500 ft 2.1% > 1,500 ft 95.9% > 1,000 ft 40.0% > 1,000 ft 96.1% > 500 ft

8 3° Approach Glide Slope 3.5° Approach Glide Slope

From 15,000 feet in, 76.5% of all aircraft are at or above the 3° Approach Glide Slope*

From 15,000 feet in, 29% of all aircraft are at or above the 3.5° Approach Glide Slope*

*These calculations include a 100 foot buffer to account for any flight path tracking anomalies

Noise Comment Analyses

9 2020 Noise Comments Summary

363 +313% +90* compared New households commented in Total Comments to 2019 received in 2020 104* 2020 Total households commented in 2020 3.5 Average comments Sunday filed per household February* Day when most comments were made Month with the most 37 (36%) 1 comments 6 AM Households made more Median comments Time when most than 1 comment in 2020 filed per household comments were reported *20 households have an unknown address location and are considered distinct households *Part 150 Kick-off meetings held in February 2020. making new comments in 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change

Noise Comment Analysis Noise Comments Number of Noise Number of Distinct Year • Three households represent 30% of Comments Households the total comments received between 2012 203 71 2012 through 2020. 2013 764 108 2014 265 74 • Average number of comments filed 2015 138 65 per household is over 3.4 between 2016 138 65 2012 and 2020. 2017 153 71 • Large increase (>300%) in the 2018 92 46 number of noise comments filed in 2019 116 50 2020 363 104 2020 when compared to 2019. Total 2,232 654 − Part 150 Kick-off Meetings held in SOURCE: 1. Data represents calendar year 2012 through 2020. February 2020. NOTES: − 48 comments received between January 2012 to December 2020 did not have address locations and are classified as “Unknown” or “N/A.” Unknown locations were treated as distinct households.

preliminary data – subject to change

10 Comments Since 2018 by Month

Part 150 Kick-off Meetings preliminary data – subject to change

Comments Since 2012

preliminary data – subject to change

11 Types of Comments Since 2012

preliminary data – subject to change

2020 Comments Mapped and by Number of Comments

• Average Comments per Household: 3.5 • Six Locations had 10 or more comments in 2020 • Maximum comments for a single residence were 94 comments • These mapped commenters account for over 50% of all 2020 comments • These commenters only made a total of 3 comments in 2019

preliminary data – subject to change

12 2020 Comments by Neighborhood

• Comments from Grey Oaks, Lakewood, Old Naples, Park Shore, and Wyndemere make up 78% of all 2020 comments • Old Naples is the neighborhood with the most comments in 2020 (55% of all comments) • Grey Oaks, Lakewood, and Park Shore had a total of 6 addresses while Old Naples and Wyndemere had >10 addresses each.

preliminary data – subject to change

Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis

13 Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis

• Aircraft noise standards are established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP). Many countries are members of ICAO CAEP, including the United States. − ICAO noise standards are found in the ICAO Annex 16, Volume I document. • Most ICAO noise standards are established so that aircraft of lower weights must make less noise than heavier aircraft in order to comply with the standard. • The United States then promulgates the ICAO noise standards into domestic “noise stage” regulations contained in 14 CFR Part 36. • Part 36 currently contains noise stages 1 through 5. Higher stages are more stringent than lower stages.

preliminary data – subject to change

Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis

• During certification testing, aircraft fly a specific flight profile for the purposes of noise measurement. The profile is specified in 14 CFR Part 36. • Noise is measured at three points: takeoff, sideline, and approach.

NOTES: − EPNL: Effective Perceived Noise Level. − Image by ESA.

preliminary data – subject to change

14 Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis

• While general aviation jet aircraft operating in the US are currently certified to FAA Stage 3 or greater noise standards, the current certification levels of aircraft using APF is not clear. • ESA analyzed the current jet aircraft fleet, based on readily available information, to understand which aircraft meet Stage 4 or Stage 5 noise standards.

Stage 2* Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Aircraft under 75,000 lbs 1977 Standard Required New aircraft types New aircraft types – mandatory phase out for all jet aircraft certificated after certificated after in the US December 31, <75,000 lbs operating in January 1, 2006 December 31, 2020 2015 US by 2016 (10 dBA cumulative (7 dBA cumulative (or March 2002 at APF) reduction) reduction)

* APF is the only airport with an approved Part 161 study that includes a 24-hour ban of Stage 2 jets.

preliminary data – subject to change

Aircraft Fleet Noise Stage Analysis for 2019 86% of operations by aircraft that could be • ESA analysis indicates: certified to Stage 4 − 98% of CY2019 operations were flown by aircraft that are certified to Stage 3.

• Analysis also shows: − Up to 86% of CY2019 operations were flown by Stage 3 aircraft that could meet Stage 4 noise standards, including some aircraft that could meet Stage 5. − Up to 13% of CY2019 operations were flown by aircraft that could meet Stage 5 noise standards. Up to 13% of operations by aircraft that could be certified to Stage 5

preliminary data – subject to change

15 Voluntary Nighttime Curfew Jet Compliance Analysis

Voluntary Curfew Jet Noncompliance Analysis

• The NAA has reported that 2019 Voluntary Curfew Jet Noncompliance approximately 800 jet aircraft were Month Arrivals Departures not in compliance with NAA’s January 45 38 February 56 46 voluntary curfew in 2019. March 54 35 • ESA analyzed each jet April 56 48 May 45 31 noncompliance event in 2019 to June 29 15 better understand : July 13 13 − Whether they are private, charter, or August 25 18 September 17 8 fractional ownership operations October 34 36 − The number of repeat November 39 33 noncompliance activities by aircraft December 43 41 Total 456 362 owner SOURCE: 1. Calendar year 2019 jet curfew noncompliance at APF is based on data received from NAA. Does not include exempt operations.

preliminary data – subject to change

16 Voluntary Curfew Analysis – Jet Operator Types

• Reviewed available jet operator information to classify curfew noncompliance as either fractional, private, or charter. Private Charter • Curfew compliance data does not include a clear designation for fractional, private, or charter. • Overlap between operator type is likely to occur in the data (e.g., fractional operators Fractional providing charter service).

preliminary data – subject to change

Voluntary Curfew Analysis – Jet Operator Types

Jet Operator Percent Noncompliance in 2019 • Approximately 280 different jet operators (by Operator Type) flew to and/or from APF in 2019. • 192 operators had only one non-compliant Charter/Private, operation in 2019. 22.2%

• Approximately 26.5% of noncompliance Fractional, 26.0% operations were complete by private jet Charter, operators. 14.4% − 26% by fractional operators − 22.2% by charter/private operators Private, 26.5% − 14.4% by charter operators Unknown, 9.0% • Ten operators account for approximately Charter/Fractional, 1.5% 48.3% of reported curfew noncompliance in Private/Fractional, 0.2% 2019. SOURCE: 1. Operator type is classified based on data received from NAA. Does not include exempt operations.

preliminary data – subject to change

17 Additional Runway Use Analysis

Runway Use Analysis

• Runway use is a key consideration in understanding where noise exposure occurs in the surrounding communities. • Runway can vary over time based on numerous factors including weather conditions, evolution in aircraft fleet and users, location of airfield facilities, flight procedures availability, separation of air traffic, etc. • ESA is performing additional runway use analyses that will include:

Comparison of past runway use in to gain insight into how/why runway usage has changed.

In May, an online survey of pilots and/or interviews with pilot and ATCT managers will be complete to understand if pilot preference of a given runway may impact runway use.

preliminary data – subject to change

18 Runway Use Analysis

• Data collection samples vary and sometimes focus only on itinerant aircraft: − 1996 Revised NEM/NCP (Source: APF flight strip data February – May 1995) − 1998 NEM/NCP Amendment (Source: 1996 study, but runway use tables in report don’t match) − 2000 and 2010 NEM Update (Source: APF runway use logs for September 1998, and March, April, May, and August of 1999) − 2018 Master Plan Study (Source: HMMH, 2017 data from NextGen Radar using Naples InFlight system) − 2019 Runway Use (Source: ESA analysis of 2019 data from Naples InFlight system) • Reported data varies and doesn’t provide an apples-to-apples baseline − All operations? − Daytime only? − Daytime and nighttime? − Arrival and departure only? − Touch and go?

preliminary data – subject to change

Runway Use Analysis

• Flight tracking systems vary in their ability to capture certain types of data. − Arrivals and departures for itinerant aircraft are captured with a relatively high level of confidence. − Collection of local/ training activity requires considerable investigation due to system limitations. − While local operations are accurately counted by the tower, multiple touch and go's may be recorded by the tracking system as a single “circuit” while representing multiple arrival and departures.

• Runway 5-23 Runway Use − Information from 2000 onward reflects Runway 5/23 use ranging from 75-90% for daytime or nighttime use. − 2019 data reflects approximately 86% use of Runway 5/23 overall when adjusting for touch and go operations.

preliminary data – subject to change

Appendix G-9

Naples City Council Workshop

September 14, 2020

Naples City Council Workshop

Meeting Agenda

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA Naples City Council City Council Chamber, 735 8th Street South, Naples, Florida Mayor: Teresa Heitmann Vice Mayor: Terry Hutchison City Council Members: Ted Blankenship, Ray Christman, Mike McCabe, Paul Perry, Gary Price City Attorney: James Fox • City Clerk: Patricia Rambosk • City Manager: Charles Chapman

Accommodation will be made to allow public comment during the meeting while maintaining social distancing.

Welcome to today's City Council meeting. If you wish to address the Council regarding an item listed on this agenda, please complete a registration form at the rear of the room and place it in the Speaker Request Box located on the Council dais prior to consideration of that item. We ask that speakers limit their comments to 3 minutes and that large groups name a spokesperson whenever possible. Thank you for your interest and participation in City government.

City Council Workshop Monday, September 14, 2020 8:30 AM

All proposed ordinances and information on other items listed below, which have been provided in advance of this meeting, may be inspected in the office of the City Clerk, Room B, City Hall, or on the City of Naples home page https://www.naplesgov.com/ or call the City Clerk's Office, 213-1015. All written, audio-visual and other materials presented to the City Council in conjunction with deliberations during this meeting will become the property of the City of Naples and will be retained by the City Clerk.

1. Roll Call

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Set Agenda

4. Public Comment NOTICE

FORMAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED OR ADDED TO THIS AGENDA. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING (OR HEARING) WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES FOR THIS MEETING MAY CALL THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT (239) 213-1015 WITH REQUESTS AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING DATE. 5. City Manager

5.A. Presentation of the Naples Airport Authority (1) Noise Study, (2) Master Plan, and (3) Budget. (8:30 A.M. TIME CERTAIN) Recommended Action: Accept the presentations. 5.A.1 Part 150 Study Agenda Memorandum 5.A.1 PowerPoint 5.A.2. Master Plan Agenda Memorandum 5.A.2. PowerPoint 5.A.3 NAA Budget Agenda Memorandum 5.A.3 PowerPoint

5.B. Discussion related to Beach Parking and Beach Enforcement. Recommended Action: Discussion. Agenda Memorandum PowerPoint

6. Streets & Stormwater

6.A. Discussion regarding Gulf Shore Boulevard construction and restoration as part of the Naples Beach Restoration & Water Quality Project, North and South Treatment Systems. (11:30 A.M. TIME CERTAIN) Recommended Action: Receive presentation and reach consensus on design options. Agenda Memorandum Evaluation of Project Structure Supplemental Water Quality Evaluation Report Evaluation of Water Quality Improvements Water Quality Data Key Components Gulf Shore Boulevard Traffic Safety Improvements Bioreactor Presentation Bonita Springs Bioreactor

7. City Clerk

7.A. Interview two candidates for the Carver Finance Board of Directors; three candidates for the Code Enforcement Board; one candidate for the Design Review Board; two candidates for the Moorings Bay Citizens Advisory Committee; and one candidate for the Public Art Advisory Committee. (1:30 P.M. TIME CERTAIN) Recommended Action: Interview candidates. Agenda Memorandum L. McKee application - Carver Finance S. Merrick application - Carver Finance L. Mills application - Carver Finance Carver Finance resolution H. Johnson application - Code Enforcement Board J. Krol application - Code Enforcement Board T. Sansbury application - Code Enforcement Board N. Spahr application - Code Enforcement Board Code Enforcement Board - Florida Statute A. Orion application - Design Review Board Design Review Board code J. Calce application - Moorings Bay C. Holland application - Moorings Bay G. Kartsimas application - Moorings Bay Moorings Bay resolution L. Burns application - PAAC L. Burns - PAAC Letters of Recommendation PAAC code

7.B. Review of Duties and Responsibilities of All Boards and Committees. Recommended Action: Review information. Agenda Memorandum Informational List of Boards and Committees Carver Finance Board Resolution 3606 Citizens' Police Review Board Code Citizens' Police Review Board Procedures Code Enforcement Board - Florida Statutes Code Enforcement Board Code Code Enforcement Board Rules of Procedure Community Services Advisory Board - Rules of Procedure Community Services Advisory Board Code CRAAB By-laws CRAAB Code Design Review Board Code Design Review Board Handbook Design Review Board Rules and Regulations East Naples Bay Resolution 2018-14135 Moorings Bay Resolution 2017-14069 PAB Code PAB Regulations and Rules of Procedure Public Art Advisory Committe By-laws Public Art Advisory Committee Code Public Art Advisory Committee Policy Statement 8. Review of September 16, 2020 Regular City Council Agenda

Correspondence / Communications

Adjourn

Naples City Council Workshop

Materials Presented at Meeting

Naples Airport Part 150 Study City Council Briefing – September 14, 2020

Michael Arnold, Project Manager 1

Part 150 Study Overview

(NEMs) (NCP)

The 14 CFR Part 150 process is the Airport Sponsor’s mechanism to improve the compatibility between the Airport and surrounding communities Key Considerations

• NAA has strong history of industry noise leadership but a desire to examine whether any additional reasonable noise mitigation strategies can be implemented • Modest increases in jet activity are forecasted • Seasonal variations are masked by DNL • Quiet Hours voluntary curfew compliance remains above 98% • Noise exposure has generally decreased over time according to federal guidelines (14 CFR Part 150), but community concerns about aircraft noise remain

Community Engagement

4 Technical Advisory Committee

• Noise Compatibility Committee (NCC) Liaison • Naples ATCT representative • NAA Liaison • FAA RSW TRACON representative • Community Representatives • FAA Airports District Office (ADO) − NW, NE, SW and SE Quadrants − At-Large City of Naples − At-Large Collier County • City Planning Department • County Growth Management Division • Greater Naples Chamber • Naples Area Board of Realtors (NABOR) • 5th Ave S Business Improvement District • 3rd St S Business District • Naples Airport piston operator • Naples Airport jet operator

Phase I (NEM) Public Outreach

• Three Open Houses to kick-off the Part 150 Study (Feb. 2020)

• Four Technical Advisory Committee Meetings (Jan. 2020, June 2020, Tentatively Nov. 2020 and Jan. 2021)

• Opportunity for three virtual small community meetings (Fall/Winter 2020)

• NEM Public Workshop (Tentatively Jan. 2021)

• Two retail-style outreach events (TBD)

• Outreach Materials (Ongoing)

• Newsletters (Ongoing)

• Website (https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/) Top Five Public Comment Themes

“Approach runway [5] over river “Understanding of noise impact “Mandatory operation period “Aircraft are flying very low.” “Very loud engines and not Old Naples.” study is that it does not reflect of 7am to 10pm.” “There seems to be high noise.” “Can take-offs be dispersed more peak season because it “Mandatory flight curfew with variability in the altitude of “Flights are becoming evenly to reduce noise impacts?” averages across the year.” a monitoring body and fines.” planes during take-off and more frequent.” “Make the curfew mandatory.” landing.” Aircraft Flight Study Noise Paths Methodology Airport Curfew Aircraft Altitude

Alternative Strategies for Performing Community Outreach

NAA and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) is exploring opportunities to perform public outreach in the current environment, while being able to acknowledge guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Aircraft Noise Exposure

Aircraft Noise - DNL

Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)

• 24-hour time weighted energy average noise level based on A-weighted decibels (dBA)

• FAA requires the use of DNL for airport noise assessments

• Average Annual Day aircraft noise exposure is calculated over a broad area and then depicted using contour lines of equal noise levels Historic DNL Contours

Technical Analysis

12 Comprehensive Operational Analysis Jet Arrivals All Runways (14,993)

NOTE: Figures represent aircraft density in Calendar Year (CY) 2019.

Comprehensive Operational Analysis Jet Departures All Runways (15,831)

NOTE: Figures represent aircraft density in Calendar Year (CY) 2019. Naples Airport Forecast

• An updated forecast will be developed based on latest local and regional trends • NEM Study Years: 2021 (based on 2019 actual) and 2026 • Naples Airport saw an increase in number of turboprop and jet aircraft (i.e., business/corporate aviation) in recent FY2019 Actual years. 112,800 • Despite an initial significant drop in activity due to COVID19, jet charter traffic has since rebounded. SOURCE: Naples Airport Master Plan, 2020. FAA OPSNET database and ESA analysis, 2018.

Next Steps

• Noise Modeling of the 2021 and 2026 Noise Exposure Maps (Ongoing) • Small Community Meetings (Fall 2020) • Technical Advisory Committee Meetings (Winter 2020/2021) • Noise Exposure Map Report (Winter/Spring 2021) • Public Workshop (Winter/Spring 2021) • Submit Noise Exposure Map Report to FAA for formal determination (Spring 2021) • Initiate Noise Compatibility Program (Spring 2021) • FAA issues formal determination for the Noise Exposure Map Report (Summer 2021) • Completion of the Noise Compatibility Program (Tentatively Winter 2022/2023)

Naples Airport Part 150 Study materials and upcoming events are posted on the Project Website at: https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/ Questions?