Warsaw Chopin Airport Quota System Table

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Warsaw Chopin Airport Quota System Table WARSAW CHOPIN AIRPORT QUOTA SYSTEM TABLE No Aircraft type IATA Arrival Departure Code QC points QC points 1. Fokker 100 100 0,25 0,5 2. Hawker Siddeley HS125 H25 2 8 3. BAe 146-100 141 0,5 0,5 4. BAe 146-200 142 0,25 0,25 5. BAe 146-300 143 0,5 0,5 6. BAe 146 146 0,5 0,5 7. BAe 146 Freighter 14F 0,5 0,5 8. BAe 146 Freighter 14X 0,25 0,25 9. BAe 146 Freighter 14Y 0,25 0,25 10. BAe 146 Freighter 14Z 0,25 0,25 11. Airbus A310 310 1 2 12. Airbus A310-200 312 1 2 13. Airbus A310-300 313 1 2 14. Airbus A318 318 0,25 0,25 15. Airbus A319 319 0,25 0,5 16. Airbus A310-200F 31X 1 2 17. Airbus A310-300F 31Y 1 2 18. Airbus A320-100/200 320 0,5 1 19. Airbus A321-100/200 321 0,5 2 20. Airbus A320 (winglets) 32A 0,5 1 21. Airbus A319/A320/A321 32S 0,5 2 22. Airbus A330 330 0,5 2 23. Airbus A330-200 332 0,5 2 24. Airbus A330-300 333 0,5 2 25. Airbus A340 340 1 2 26. Airbus A340-200 342 0,5 2 27. Airbus A340-300 343 0,5 2 28. Airbus A340-500 345 1 2 29. Airbus A340-600 346 1 2 30. Airbus A380 380 0,5 2 31. Airbus A380-800 388 0,5 2 32. Lockheed C-141B Starlifter 50M 20 20 33. Lockheed C-5A Galaxy 51M 20 20 34. Boeing 707-300 703 8 16 35. Boeing 707/720 707 8 16 36. Boeing 707 Freighter 70F 8 16 37. Boeing 707 Combi 70M 8 16 38. Boeing 717 717 0,25 0,25 39. Boeing 727-100 721 2 4 40. Boeing 727-200 722 2 8 41. Boeing 727 727 2 8 42. Boeing 727-200 Advanced 72A 2 4 1 Passenger 43. Boeing 727-100 Mixed 72B 2 4 44. Boeing 727-200 Mixed 72C 2 8 45. Boeing 727 Freighter 72F 1 4 46. Boeing 727 Combi 72M 2 4 47. Boeing 727-200/200 Advanced Passenger 72S 2 8 48. Boeing 727-100 Freighter 72X 2 4 49. Boeing 727-200 Freighter 72Y 2 8 50. Boeing 737-100 731 20 20 51. Boeing 737-200 732 2 8 52. Boeing 737-300 733 1 0,5 53. Boeing 737-400 734 1 1 54. Boeing 737-500 735 1 0,5 55. Boeing 737-600 736 0,25 0,25 56. Boeing 737-700 737 2 8 57. Boeing 737-800 738 0,5 1 58. Boeing 737-900 739 0,5 1 59. Boeing 737 737-200 Advanced Passenger 73A 2 8 60. Boeing 737-300 (winglets) 73C 1 0,5 61. Boeing 737 Freighter 73F 2 8 62. Boeing 737-700 73G 0,5 1 63. Boeing 737-800 (winglets) 73H 0,5 1 64. Boeing 737 737-900 (winglets) Passenger 73J 0,5 1 65. Boeing 737-200 Combi 73M 2 8 66. Boeing 737-400 Freighter 73P 1 1 67. Boeing 737-400 Mixed 73Q 1 1 68. Boeing 737-700 Freighter 73S 0,5 1 69. Boeing 737-700 (winglets) 73W 0,5 1 70. Boeing 737-300 Freighter 73Y 1 0,5 71. Boeing 747-100 741 8 16 72. Boeing 747-200 742 8 16 73. Boeing 747-300 743 4 8 74. Boeing 747-400 744 2 4 75. Boeing 747 747 8 16 76. Boeing 747-800 748 1 2 77. Boeing 747-200 Combi 74C 8 16 78. Boeing 747-300 Combi 74D 4 16 79. Boeing 747-400 Combi 74E 2 8 80. Boeing 747 Freighter 74F 4 8 81. Boeing 747-400 74J 2 4 82. Boeing 747SP 74L 4 16 83. Boeing 747 Combi 74M 8 16 84. Boeing 747SR 74R 4 16 85. Boeing 747SP 74S 4 8 86. Boeing 747-100 Freighter 74T 8 16 2 87. Boeing 747-300/200 SUD F 74U 8 16 88. Boeing 747SR Freighter 74V 4 16 89. Boeing 747-200 Freighter 74X 8 16 90. Boeing 747-400 Freighter 74Y 2 4 91. Boeing 757-200 752 1 1 92. Boeing 757-300 753 0,25 1 93. Boeing 757 757 1 1 94. Boeing 757 Freighter 75F 1 1 95. Boeing 757 Mixed 75M 1 2 96. Boeing 757-300 (winglets) 75T 0,25 1 97. Boeing 757-200 (winglets) 75W 1 1 98. Boeing 767-200 762 2 2 99. Boeing 767-300 763 1 2 100. Boeing 767-400 764 0,5 2 101. Boeing 767 767 2 2 102. Boeing 767 Freighter 76F 1 2 103. Boeing 767-300 (winglets) Freighter 76V 1 2 104. Boeing 767-300 (winglets) 76W 0,5 2 105. Boeing 767-200 Freighter 76X 2 2 106. Boeing 767-300 Freighter 76Y 1 2 107. Boeing 777-200 772 1 2 108. Boeing 777-300 773 1 2 109. Boeing 777 777 2 2 110. Boeing 777-200LR 77L 1 2 111. Boeing 777-300ER 77W 1 2 112. Boeing 777-200 Freighter 77X 1 2 113. Boeing 787-800 788 1 1 114. Antonov An-26 A26 1 2 115. Antonov An-30 A30 20 20 116. Antonov An-32 A32 20 20 117. Antonov An-124 A4F 2 16 118. Antonov An-225 A5F 8 16 119. Airbus A300 AB3 2 2 120. Airbus A300B2/B4/C4 AB4 2 2 121. Airbus A300-600 AB6 1 2 122. Airbus A300F ABF 2 2 123. Airbus A300ST Super Transporter ABS 20 20 124. Airbus A300C4/F4 Freighter ABX 2 2 125. Airbus A600-600F ABY 1 2 126. Rockwell Commander/Turbo Commander ACD 20 20 127. Rockwell Commander ACP 20 20 128. Rockwell Turbo Commander ACT 20 20 129. Antonov An-24 AN4 16 16 130. Antonov An-26 AN6 1 2 131. Antonov An-72/An-74 AN7 0,5 0,5 132. Antonov An-12 ANF 0,5 2 3 133. BAe Avro RJ100 AR1 0,5 0,5 134. BAe Avro RJ70 AR7 0,5 0,5 135. BAe Avro RJ85 AR8 0,5 0,5 136. BAe Avro RJ70/RJ85/RJ100 ARJ 0,5 0,5 137. ATR 42-300/400 AT3 0,5 0,25 138. ATR 42-300/320 AT4 0,25 0,25 139. ATR 42-500 AT5 0,5 0,25 140. ATR 72 AT7 0,25 0,25 141. ATR 42-400 ATD 0,5 0,25 142. BAE ATP ATP 0,5 0,25 143. ATR 42/72 ATR 0,5 0,25 144. BAC One Eleven B11 99 99 145. BAC One Eleven 200 B12 1 4 146. BAC One Eleven 300 B13 1 4 147. BAC One Eleven 400/47 B14 1 8 148. BAC One Eleven 500 B15 1 8 149. Boeing 720B B72 4 8 150. Boeing Business Jet BBJ 0,5 0,5 151. Beech 1900/1900C/1900D BE1 0,25 0,25 152. Beech Twin Piston BE2 0,25 0,25 153. Hawker 400 Beechjet (400A/400XP/400T) BE4 0,25 1 154. Beechcraft 99 BE9 0,25 0,25 155. Beech light aircraft BEC 0,25 0,25 156. Beech 1900D BEH 0,25 0,25 157. Beechcraft BEJ 0,25 0,25 158. Beech Single Piston BEP 0,25 0,25 159. Beech 1900/1900C BES 0,25 0,25 160. Beech Twin Turboprop BET 0,25 0,25 161. Bell Helicopter BH2 0,5 1 162. Britten Norman BN-2A/B Islander BN1 0,25 0,25 163. Britten Norman BN-2A/B Islander BNI 0,25 0,25 164. Britten Norman BN-2A Mk III Trislander BNT 0,25 0,25 165. Boeing Helicopters Chinook BVH 0,5 2 166. C17 GLOBEMASTER C17 16 16 167. Canadair Challenger 600/601/604/605 CCJ 0,25 0,5 168. Bombardier BD-700 Global 5000/ Bombardier Global Express CCX 0,25 0,5 169. GAF Nomad N22B/N24A CD2 20 20 170. Bombardier Global Express CGX 0,5 0,5 171. Cessna 500/501/525 Citation CJ1 0,25 0,25 172. Cessna 550/551/552 Citation/Cessna 550 Citation 2/Cessna 551 Citation 2SP CJ2 0,25 0,5 173. Cessna 680 Citation Sovereign CJ8 0,25 0,25 174. Cessna 560 Citation XL/XLS CJL 0,25 0,25 4 175. Cessna 510 Citation Mustang CJM 0,25 0,25 176. Bombardier Challenger 300 CL3 0,25 0,25 177. Canadair CL-44 CL4 0,5 0,5 178. Canadair Challenger 600/601/604/605 CL6 0,5 0,5 179. Cessna light aircraft single piston CN1 0,25 0,25 180. Cessna light aircraft twin piston CN2 0,25 0,25 181. Cessna 750 Citation X CN7 0,25 0,25 182. Cessna light aircraft CNA 0,25 0,25 183. Cessna Single Turboprop CNC 0,25 0,25 184. Cessna Citation CNJ 0,25 0,25 185. Cessna Twin Turboprop CNT 0,25 0,25 186. Canadiar CRJ 100 CR1 0,25 0,25 187. Canadiar CRJ 200 CR2 0,5 0,5 188. Canadiar CRJ 700 CR7 0,25 0,25 189. Canadiar CRJ 900 CR9 0,25 0,25 190. Canadiar CRJ CRJ 0,5 0,5 191. Sud-Est SE.210 Caravelle CRV 4 4 192. CASA 212 Aviocar CS2 0,5 0,5 193. Airtech CN-235 CS5 0,5 0,5 194.
Recommended publications
  • “I Have the Fokker in Sight!”
    “I have the Fokker in sight!” After some delays caused by tropical cyclone “Gita” the first of our two Fokker F27 Friendship aircraft arrived from New Zealand on Monday 27 February. Now registered VH-EWH, the Friendship departed Auckland on Sunday 26 February, stopping to refuel at Norfolk Island before proceeding to Coolangatta to clear customs. The intention was to proceed to Wollongong that same day, but bad weather in the Illawarra dictated an overnight stay at Coolangatta. The second aircraft will be ferried sometime in the next few months. In Australian service the Fokker F27 Friendship was operated from the late 1950’s by many of the domestic and regional airlines. Some of the Australian airlines which operated the type include Trans Australia Airlines, Ansett ANA, East West, Queensland Airlines, Bill Peach’s Aircruising Australia and Airlines of NSW. The type was also operated by the Department of Civil Aviation and CSIRO. The Fokker F27 was developed during the early 1950’s and was intended to compete with or replace piston engine aircraft such as the DC-3. It uses Rolls Royce Dart turboprop engines, is pressurised and, in typical configuration seats around 50 passengers. Our F27s were most recently in service with a company that provided services to New Zealand Post and our Kiwi readers would be well familiar with the sight and unique sounds of the F27s as they made their way around the mail runs. Convair CV-440 progress The return to flight project for our Convair CV-440 made significant progress this month with completion of the new engine installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Analysis
    CHAPTER 5 RUNWAY ANALYSIS 5 5 RUNWAY ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION The primary issue to be addressed in the William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) Master Plan involves the ultimate length and configuration of the runway system. At present there are two runways; primary Runway 8/26 and crosswind Runway 13/31. Runway 8/26 is 6,347 feet long and 150-feet wide with a displaced threshold of 1,354 feet on the approach end to Runway 26. The threshold was displaced to provide for an unobstructed visual approach slope of 20:1. Runway 13/31 is designated as the crosswind runway and is 3,250-feet long by 50-feet wide. In the 1997 ALP Update, the FAA determined that this runway was not required to provide adequate wind coverage and would not be eligible for FAA funding of any improvements in the future. The Port of Port Angeles has committed to keeping this runway functional without FAA support for as long as it is feasible. Subsequent sections of this analysis will reexamine the need for the runway. Both runways are supported by parallel taxiway systems with Taxiway A serving Runway 8/26 and Taxiway J for Runway 13/31. Taxiway A is 40 feet wide and Taxiway J is 50 feet wide. AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS In determining airfield requirements, FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design (Change 14), has been consulted. This circular requires that future classification of the airport be defined as the basis for airfield planning criteria. As shown in the forecast chapter, the critical aircraft at CLM is expected to be the small business jet represented by the Cessna Citation within 5-years.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts
    SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to provide reasonable projections of future activity that can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. The first draft of this chapter was prepared in January 2018. Following FAA review, several revisions have been made, including updated based aircraft and aircraft operations forecasts. The original forecasts are maintained as originally presented for reference. Overview and Purpose This chapter provides updated aviation activity forecasts for Southwest Washington Regional Airport (KLS) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2017-2037). The most recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved aviation activity forecasts for KLS were developed for the 2007-2027 planning period in the 2011 Airport Master Plan update. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with the current and historic role of KLS as a regional general aviation airport, capable of accommodating a wide range of activity, including business class turboprops and jets. The well-documented shortage of public use airports in Southwest Washington with comparable capabilities, highlights the importance of recognizing the regional role of KLS in its current and long term planning. CHAPTER 3 - AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS | DECEMBER 2020 | PAGE 3-1 SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN The forecasts of activity are unconstrained and assume the City of Kelso will be able to make the facility improvements necessary to accommodate the anticipated demand, unless specifically noted. The City of Kelso will consider if any unconstrained demand will not or cannot be reasonably met through the evaluation of airport development alternatives later in the master plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 79952 Federal Register / Vol
    79952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Unsafe Condition DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, (d) This AD was prompted by an accident Washington 98057–3356; telephone and the subsequent discovery of cracks in the Federal Aviation Administration (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. main rotor blade (blade) spars. We are issuing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 39 this AD to prevent blade failure and Discussion subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. [Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate We issued a supplemental notice of Compliance Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD; Amendment 39–16544; AD 2010–26–05] proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend (e) Before further flight, unless already 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that done: RIN 2120–AA64 would apply to the specified products. (1) Revise the Limitations section of the That supplemental NPRM was Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by published in the Federal Register on AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours time- July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43878). That Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET in-service (TIS) for each blade set Remove supplemental NPRM proposed to FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G each blade set with 8,000 or more hours TIS. correct an unsafe condition for the Airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON (2) Replace each specified serial-numbered specified products. The MCAI states: 200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE- blade set with an airworthy blade set in During maintenance on one aircraft, it was accordance with the following table: FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20– F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Viking and PAL Aerospace Sign DHC-6 Twin Otter Aerial Firefighting System Contract
    For Immediate Release Viking and PAL Aerospace Sign DHC-6 Twin Otter Aerial Firefighting System Contract Calgary, Alberta and St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador - August 3, 2021 -- Viking Air Limited (“Viking”) and PAL Aerospace Canada are proud to announce the establishment of a contract to support the Twin Otter Fire Attack System. The agreement’s scope includes the design, manufacturing, installation, and certification of the Aerial Firefighting System for the Twin Otter DHC-6 300 and 400 aircraft. It is anticipated that the Aerial Firefighting System will be certified in 2022 and an international customer will receive the first converted aircraft. This undertaking is a progressive effort between Viking and PAL Aerospace to build additional capabilities for the already versatile DHC-6 Twin Otter Series 300 and 400 aircraft. The Aerial Firefighting System will allow the Twin Otter to transition effortlessly between global firefighting missions and its more traditional mission profiles, including transporting passengers and cargo. The airtanker-configured Twin Otter aircraft will help mitigate and fight wildfires with the ability to drop up to 700 US gallons of water or retardant in challenging environments. Phillip Garbutt, PAL Aerospace Senior Vice President of Global Support said, “PAL Aerospace is proud to partner with Viking on this exciting project that supports innovation, economic growth, and supply chains in Canada. As an established DHC-6 Twin Otter Operator, we know firsthand the capability and versatility of the aircraft and consider it a privilege to bring our comprehensive design, engineering and modification capabilities to bear in developing this new capability.” “We are happy to work with PAL Aerospace to provide our operators the ability to utilize our DHC-6 Twin Otter for specialized aerial firefighting missions,” said Benjamin Carson, Director of Customer Support Operations, Viking.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Canadian Registered Aircraft (As of December 31, 2020)
    Catalogue no. 11‑621‑M ISSN 1707‑0503 ISBN : 978‑0‑660‑38413‑9 Analysis in Brief Overview of Canadian Registered Aircraft (as of December 31, 2020) Release date: May 13, 2021 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website, www.statcan.gc.ca. You can also contact us by Email at STATCAN.infostats‑[email protected] Telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers: • Statistical Information Service 1‑800‑263‑1136 • National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1‑800‑363‑7629 • Fax line 1‑514‑283‑9350 Depository Services Program • Inquiries line 1‑800‑635‑7943 • Fax line 1‑800‑565‑7757 Standards of service to the public Note of appreciation Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada long‑standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the has developed standards of service that its employees observe. citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information Statistics Canada toll‑free at 1‑800‑263‑1136. The service could not be produced without their continued co‑operation standards are also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under and goodwill. “Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.” Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2021 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes
    43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules Applicability New Requirements of This AD: Actions Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. (h) Within 30 months after the effective 2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated date of this AD, do the actions specified in 27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related in any category, all serial numbers. paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD information. concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, Subject both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 2010. (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of terminates the actions required by paragraph Jeffrey E. Duven, America Code 27: Flight Controls. (g) of this AD. (1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Reason 9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (e) The mandatory continuing stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the [FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Two reports have been received where, Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 27, 2009. F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts (2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION that connect the horizontal stabilizer control of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and unit actuator with the dog-links was found install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance Federal Aviation Administration broken (one on the nut side & one on the with the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, head side).
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Challenger 300
    E&V ID A-16050301 2006 CHALLENGER 300 BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 300 (CL300) ASKING PRICE: US$ 7.950.000 YOM 2006 MSN 20097 Bombardier is a Canadian multinational aerospace and transportation company, founded in 1942 in Quebec. Starting as a maker of snow machines, over the years it has become a large manufacturer of regional aircraft, business jets, mass transportation equipment, recreational equipment and a provider of financial services. Bombardier is a Fortune Global 500 conglomerate company. Its headquarters are in Montreal. In 1986 Bombardier acquired Canadair. Shortly thereafter, de Havilland Canada, and Learjet operations were absorbed by the aerospace arm, which now accounts for over half of company revenue. Bombardier’s most popular aircraft currently include its Dash 8, CRJ100/200/440, and CRJ700/900/1000 lines of regional airliners. Bombardier also manufactures the CL-415 amphibious water-bomber, the Global Express and the Challenger business jet. Learjet continues to operate as a subsidiary of Bombardier, manufacturing jets under the Learjet marque. The slogan was changed in 2012 from “We Move People” to “Evolution of Mobility.” Bombardier’s Challenger 300 aircraft was the first in the super-midsize business jet category to challenge the standard with its clean sheet design. After extensive research to achieve customers’ business goals, the aircraft was crafted for true U.S. coast-to-coast range and features unmatched room in which to conference and work. ISSUE 160503 | Page 1 EDISON AVIATION S.A. Master Licensee of Engel & Völkers Marken GmbH & Co. KG 35A, Avenue J.F. Kennedy | L-1855 Luxembourg | Luxembourg R.C.S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Repair Capabilities List
    Repair Capabilities List Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 100000-14 N/A Linear Actuator Lockheed C-130 Yes 100000-29 N/A Actuator Embraer EMB120 Yes 100000-60 N/A Linear Actuator Fokker F28 MK0070; F28 MK0100 Yes 100000-77 2045352 Actuator, Embraer EMB-500 Yes Electromechanical Linear 100100-1 030A-989504-1 Actuator Aileron Mitsubishi MU-2B, -26A, -36A, -40, -60 Yes 102000-1 N/A Actuator Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Assembly 102000-2 N/A Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Page 1 of 43 Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 102000-3 560254-503 Actuator Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear Assembly 102000-4 560254-505 Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear 102000-7 560254-507 Actuator, Landing Mooney M20 Yes Gear 102000-9 N/A Linear Actuator N/A Yes 102000-10 N/A Actuator Assembly, Mooney M20 Yes Linear 102000-12 N/A Actuator Assembly, N/A Yes Main Landing Gear 102000-13 N/A Actuator, Landing Mooney Yes Gear Assembly 104500-1 N/A Linear Actuator Gulfstream Yes Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Page 2 of 43 Eaton P/N Customer P/N Nomenclature Aircraft Usage Repair Capabilities Comments 104500-2 N/A Linear Actuator Gulfstream Yes 105900-2 159SCC100-23 Trim Control Linear Gulfstream GIII, GIV, and GV Yes Actuator 114000-1 N/A Actuator, Rotary Cessna Citation Yes Approved through Direct Shipment Authorization - Expires 9/14/13 114000-3 N/A Actuator, Rotary Cessna Citation Yes 116900-2 N/A Linear Actuator Fokker F27 MK050 Yes 116900-3 N/A Door
    [Show full text]
  • EVAS® MODEL ELIGIBILITY LIST for Model 107STC
    EVAS® MODEL ELIGIBILITY LIST for Model 107STC This eligibility list is a controlled document from VisionSafe Corporation, manufacturer of EVAS® under PMA PQ1885NM. This list is used to determine which EVAS® model corresponds to which aircraft model(s). Applicable foreign STCs are also noted. The eligibility list can also be found on the certification page of our website, www.visionsafe.com. For questions, please contact VisionSafe Corporation Quality Assurance: [email protected] or 808-235-0849 Log of Revisions Revision Date Description Original 13-Dec-07 Original release, eligibility: STC by EVAS™ Model Number (page 1); STC by Aircraft Model Name (page 2); portable* by EVAS™ Model Number (page 4); portable* by Aircraft Model Name (page 4) A 7-May-08 Added EASA approval for Hawker Beechcraft 400A; Embraer 145(); Dassault Falcon 7X B 26-Jun-08 Added FAA and TCCA approval for Hawker Beechcraft Hawker 750, 850XP, 900XP; Embraer ERJ 190-100 STD, LR, IGW C 2-Dec-08 Added portable* models for Boeing 707-300; Dassault Falcon 20 D 27-Mar-09 Added portable* models for Learjet 55; page 5** for Projects in Process E 30-Jun-09 Added column for ANAC (Brazil) approval for Gulfstream G-1159A, G-IV, GV, GV-SP F 10-Jul-09 Added EASA approval for Cessna 680 G 27-Aug-09 Added portable* models for Cessna 525 H 19-Mar-10 Added column for ANAC Argentina approval for Bombardier CL-600-1A11, -2A12, -2B16, -2B19, -2C10, -2D15, -2D24 I 17-May-10 Updated aircraft list for EASA approval of Embraer 135 & 145 J 12-Jul-10 Added ANAC Brazil approval for Gulfstream GIV-X K 22-Jul-10 Added EASA approval for BD-100-1A10 L 24-Sep-10 *Portable models (pages 3 & 4) moved to VS QC-Form 43.
    [Show full text]
  • No Surprises Here
    REPORT 2009 BUSINESS AIRCRAFT FLEET US were having a fire sale trying to NO SURPRISES HERE quickly get rid of their business air- craft in order to avoid government and public scrutiny, countries like Brazil were turning to Business Aviation as a business solution. The result – well, we think the numbers speak for them- selves. So yes, 2009 was a slow year for Business Aviation – as expected. The World Fleet continued to grow, although at a much slower rate than past years (the world fleet grew by seven percent last year, in comparison to this year’s 4.8 percent). And yes, Europe may have been a surprise as it navigated the crisis fairly well, but only saw a 9.7 percent increase in its fleet, which although strong is almost half the size of last year’s world-lead- ing 18 percent. But the slowdowns in Europe and the US are made up for by the 15.3, 27.1 and 13.3 percent growth rates in Africa, Asia/Middle East and South America respectively. FLEET TOTALS Ok, so we changed our minds about (As of End 2009) 2009. Business Aviation is not slowing World Fleet 29,992 down. Business Aviation is simply European Fleet 3,959 changing, shifting and going where Jet Aircraft Worldwide 17,118 business goes – building new Turboprops Worldwide 12,499 economies and ensuring that business gets done. By Nick Klenske ust take a brief glance at the Overview J numbers and it should be blatant- Let us start from the end – or as close No surprise here.
    [Show full text]