Basic Assessment Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
www.dedea.gov.za BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT (For official use only) File Reference Number: Application Number: Date Received: Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998(Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. DEDEAT REFERENCE NUMBER: EC05/C/LN1&3/M/18-2015 Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. “Innovation for Sustainable Development” t Floor Room 274 • Beacon Hill • Hockley Close • Kind William’s Town • 5600 | Private Bag X0054 • 5605 • Republic of South Africa TeL; 043 605 7099• Fax: 043 605 7300 | Email: • Web: www.dedeat.gov.za VERSION 1 dated 8 December 2014 www.dedea.gov.za 2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable or black out the boxes that are not applicable in the report. 4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations. 6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority. 7. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner (EAP). 9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process. 10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed. “Innovation for Sustainable Development” t Floor Room 274 • Beacon Hill • Hockley Close • Kind William’s Town • 5600 | Private Bag X0054 • 5605 • Republic of South Africa TeL; 043 605 7099• Fax: 043 605 7300 | Email: • Web: www.dedeat.gov.za VERSION 1 dated 8 December 2014 www.dedea.gov.za SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this YES NO section? X If YES, please complete form XX for each specialist thus appointed: Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D. 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail The District Roads Engineer (DRE) proposes to reconstruct the Kariega River Low-Level Bridge on the gravel road that runs west-east just north of Kenton-on-Sea between the R343 and the P{ort Alfred to Southwell District Road (District Road, DR1950) (refer to Figure 1 included below). This was necessitated by extensive damage to the right bank approach embankment of the existing bridge in 2011 due to a high rainfall and subsequent flooding event in the river. The event showed that the hydraulic capacity of the existing bridge is insufficient to accommodate high flows in the river. As a result traffic has been forced to cross through the river. This poses a safety risk to all road users. The continuous traversing through the river is also causing damage to the river banks and the river bed. The proposed bridge will be approximately 35 metres in length and 5 metres wide. The scope of the engineering works includes the reconstruction of the low- level bridge with larger culverts to increase flow under the bridge but the crossing will, however, be designed to be overtopped during extreme events. The proposed crossing will comprise seven portal box culverts, each 2.4 metres wide by 1.8 metres high, laid parallel to the direction of flow in the river as it approaches the site of the crossing (see Appendix C). Each culvert will comprise six 1.2 metres-long precast concrete units, Class 75S to SANS 986 (Rectangular Box Culverts). The culverts will be founded on a cast-in situ reinforced concrete slab 200mm thick. The slab will be laid on the river bed after suitable levelling and grading and, where necessary, filling soft spots with dental concrete. The base slab will be extended about 3.5m upstream of the entrance to the culverts to provide smooth flow conditions at the culvert entrances, and about the same distance at the downstream ends to prevent erosion by exiting flow. Four transverse cut-off walls approximately 600mm deep will be constructed beneath the slab at the upstream and downstream ends of the slab and at two places between to prevent water flowing under the “Innovation for Sustainable Development” t Floor Room 274 • Beacon Hill • Hockley Close • Kind William’s Town • 5600 | Private Bag X0054 • 5605 • Republic of South Africa TeL; 043 605 7099• Fax: 043 605 7300 | Email: • Web: www.dedeat.gov.za VERSION 1 dated 8 December 2014 www.dedea.gov.za slab and eroding the river bed beneath the structure. Figure 1: Location of the proposed crossing, the insert shows the extent of the damage on the existing bridge. The culverts will be laid about 2m apart, and the space between them filled with cement stabilised backfill material, with the upstream and downstream ends being sealed with a reinforced concrete wall. Reinforced concrete wing walls will be constructed at each side of the crossing to protect the river banks from erosion. The road slab will be a reinforced concrete slab approximately 200mm thick. The bed and banks of the river upstream and downstream of the crossing will be reinforced with Reno mattresses and stone-filled gabions respectively up to a certain level, above which the river banks and the side slopes of the road embankment will be reinforced with grouted stone pitching. The crossing will have to be constructed in two cofferdams, since the river flows continuously except in drought conditions. A water use authorisation in terms of Section 21 (c) and (i) of the National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998) was initially anticipated, however it has been determined that the exact location of the low-level crossing is within the upper reaches of the estuary and is thus the mandate of the Department of Oceans and Coasts. Discussions with the Department of Water and Sanitation “Innovation for Sustainable Development” t Floor Room 274 • Beacon Hill • Hockley Close • Kind William’s Town • 5600 | Private Bag X0054 • 5605 • Republic of South Africa TeL; 043 605 7099• Fax: 043 605 7300 | Email: • Web: www.dedeat.gov.za VERSION 1 dated 8 December 2014 www.dedea.gov.za and Oceans and Coasts have confirmed this. A formal letter indicating such has been requested and will be included in the Final Basic Assessment Report. 2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES “alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to— (a) The property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) The type of activity to be undertaken; (c) The design or layout of the activity; (d) The technology to be used in the activity; (e) The operational aspects of the activity; and (f) The option of not implementing the activity. Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent. Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative. (a) The property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity: This application is for the reconstruction of an existing bridge to increase its hydraulic capacity to accommodate high flows in the river. A new low-level bridge will be constructed in the same footprint as the previous bridge, to reduce the overall impacts associated with the construction and operation phases. It should be noted that larger culverts will be installed in order to increase the hydraulic capacity of the bridge to accommodate high flows during heavy rainfall and flooding events, thereby reducing the potential risk for damage. For these reasons no location alternatives have been considered for this application. (b) The type of activity to be undertaken: Due to the fact that the application is for the reconstruction of an existing bridge that has been damaged, no activity alternatives have been considered for this application.