DOCSLIB.ORG

Accelerate Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 1C (MDG1.C Programme)”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Framework Contract SIEA 2018 – Lot 1 – Rural Development EuropeAid/138778 /DH/SER/multi Ref: 2018/404595/1 FINAL EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAMME “Accelerate Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 1C (MDG1.C Programme )” Final Report (Annexes) January 2020 This project is funded by the European Union Implemented by EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION to MOZAMBIQUE Framework Contract SIEA 2018 – Lot 1 – Rural Development EuropeAid/138778/DH/SER/multi Contract N°: 2018/404595/1 FINAL EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAMME “Accelerate Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 1C (MDG1.C Programme)” Final Report (Annexes) January 2020 Team Composition: TEAM LEADER: MR SIMONE ARZENI EXPERT 2: MR BERT LOF EXPERT 3: MS MARGARITA LOVÓN CASTRO This preparation of this report was funded by the European Union. The views expressed are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent any official view of the Commission or the Government of this country Final Evaluation of the MDG1c Programme in Mozambique – Annexes of the Final Report | ii ANNEXES 0) Results Components assessment 1) Terms of Reference 2) Team composition and resumed CVs of the experts 3) List of districts and activities 4) Revised workplan 5) Field itinerary 6) List of persons contacted 7) List of documents 8) Evaluation matrix and Questions for Results Components 9) Overview of Evaluability of impact and outcome level indicators 10) Theory of Change and Logframes 11) Humanitarian assistance data 12) Intermediary Note PPT presentation to Reference Group Final Evaluation of the MDG1c Programme in Mozambique – Annexes of the Final Report | iii ANNEX 0 Results Components Assessment Final Evaluation of the MDG1c Programme in Mozambique – Annexes of the Final Report ACHIEVEMENTS BY RESULT COMPONENT (Main achievements, key findings & factors leading to the achievements, key specific lesson learned) RC1 – Support to seed sector ..................................................................................................................... 2 RC2 – Access to agriculture inputs (e-Vouchers) ..................................................................................... 5 RC3 – Relevant advisory services (FAO and IFAD) ................................................................................ 10 RC4 – Vaccination of Chickens against New Castle disease ................................................................ 15 RC5 – ProAQUA: Aquaculture................................................................................................................... 19 RC6 – ProPESCA: Artisanal Fisheries ..................................................................................................... 23 RC7a – PROMER: Market access for improved incomes ....................................................................... 25 RC7b – Dynamic market intermediaries in small-scale agriculture established ................................. 28 RC8 – Reduction of Post-harvest losses (Gorongosa silos) ................................................................. 31 RC9 – Higher value fish produced and marketed by artisanal fisher folks .......................................... 33 RC10 – Economic and market infrastructure improved for agriculture and fisheries sectors .......... 36 RC11 – Access to Financial Services ....................................................................................................... 38 RC12 – Commodity Exchange and Market information ......................................................................... 40 RC 13 – Food Fortification ......................................................................................................................... 43 RC 14b– Social Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) - WFP ..................................................... 48 RC 16a– Nutrition education and home gardens (FAO) ......................................................................... 53 RC 16b – Nutrition education in schools (FAO) ...................................................................................... 57 RC 16c – Nutrition education in PROMER, ProPESCA and PSP (IFAD) ............................................... 59 1 RC1 – Support to seed sector Outcome indicator: The main goal of Component 1 is the “Increased availability in the market and use by farmers of high-quality seed of adapted varieties.”. The increased availability of high-quality seeds is expected to contribute to ’enhanced agricultural production’. Outputs Indicators Baseline Target Achieved Percentage of smallholder farmers using 5% 25% Not reported improved seeds Number of new varieties released - 50 47 (94%) The verification means to assess progress on these outcomes were mentioned to be: 1) Baseline survey and impact study, 2) Seed component progress reports, and 3) Trial reports. Only the progress reports (2) have been produced. Whereas a total of 10 output indicators have been monitored (and some even in detail per crop), two out of three outcome indicators have not been monitored and reported. The implication is that the impact of this component on agricultural production cannot be assessed in a quantitative way, but only qualitatively. In terms of outputs, the achievements have been 168% for the production of pre-basic seeds (21.2 tons produced) and 111% for basic seed production (173.4 tons produced). Rationale The Result Component 1 “support to the seed sector” has been implemented by FAO in 17 districts in five provinces. The component has focused on 1) strengthening the institutional and policy framework, 2) the introduction and multiplication of improved varieties, and 3) improvement of seed production by small-scale producers. The budget of the component was € 1.592.429 according to the 2016 addendum. The 2017 USAID study on the Mozambique seed sector identified about 10 programmes to support the seed sector, including Feed the Future, AGRA, InovAgro, SEMEAR, ISSD, etc. The FAO documentation and half- yearly reports mention that they are collaborating with a number of them in particular in the Institutional Strengthening element of the RC 1. The FAO documents do not fully analyse the specific role and contribution of FAO in relation to the other stakeholders in the national seed sector, but it is clear that its role is complementary and intends to avoid duplications. However, it is difficult to assess what the unique contribution of FAO has been to the strengthening of the seed sector. Furthermore, there has been some overlap with other projects and programmes; for instance the SDC supported InovAgro project worked with seed companies and agro-dealers in 11 districts of three northern provinces including four covered by FAO (Gurué, Alto Molocué, Ribaué and Malema districts); Feed the Future and SEMEAR also have an overlap with regard to target districts. Main achievements (whenever possible comparing to indicators) The main achievements of this result component (RC 1) “support to the seed sector” are assessed to be the following: Seed institutional and policy framework. In the context of MDG1c FAO has been one of the technical and financial partners to contribute to the strengthening of the seed institutional and policy framework. In close collaboration with relevant donors (USAID/ Feed the Future, AGRA, SDC/ InovAgro) support has been provided to the strengthening of the institutional and policy framework of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security MASA/DINAS. As FAO has been one of the partners closely collaborating with and providing assistance to the National Seed Department of DINAS, it is not possible to attribute the achievements only to FAO; but the Ministry through the DINAS director asserted that the contribution of FAO to the seed sector institutional strengthening was substantial. In the first place, the support to the alignment with SADC’s Harmonised Seed Regulatory System (HSRS). This harmonisation is essential to ensure that the quality of Mozambican seeds meets international standards. Support to the National Seed Department of DINAS included amongst others of training on seed quality control, an important element in the seed sector. A second element of FAO’s institutional support (technical advice and financial support) has been its contribution – together with other stakeholders - to the establishment of a National Seed Dialogue Platform in which the National Seed Department, private sector 2 seed producers and other relevant partners are represented. The National Platform mainly serves to exchange information related to the seed sector between parties involved. FAO also provides support to the Association to Promote the Seed Sector, APROSE (FAO finances its executive secretariat). FAO further contributed to the operationalisation of the private sector seed inspector’s model, in particular the training and accreditation of inspectors. Two national studies on the seed sector and one regional study have been produced with support of FAO/ MDG1c: 1) a study of June 2016 analyses the seed market, in particular the source of seeds being used; and 2) a recent study of June 2019 undertaken by APROSE has analysed the share of subsidized and free seed distribution by government, NGOs and FAO, and 3) a study on the seeds markets in the Zambézia and Nampula provinces of June 2018. All three studies give a good (qualitative and quantitative) overview of the seed sector in Mozambique indicating that the use of certified seeds is increasing but that preserved own local varieties are still the main source of seeds. The studies
Recommended publications
  • A Landscape Approach to Elephant Conservation in Mozambique

    A Landscape Approach to Elephant Conservation in Mozambique

    A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique by Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria February 2012 i © University of Pretoria A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique Student: Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Supervisor: Professor Rudi J. van Aarde Conservation Ecology Research Unit Department of Zoology & Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria 0002 rjvaardezoology.up.ac.za Co-supervisor: Dr Sam M. Ferreira Scientific Services South African National Parks Skukuza 1350 South Africa Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) ii Abstract People and elephants share landscapes throughout Mozambique. Here elephant conservation management focuses on protected areas but fails to address the conflict that exists between elephants and people. In this thesis I develop a landscape approach to conflict mitigation that is designed to accommodate the needs of people and of elephants in human-dominated landscapes. Mozambique faces a dilemma: politically it is required to reduce poverty while at the same time adhere to international agreements and requirements to protect biodiversity with relatively scarce financial resources. Reactive mitigation of human-elephant conflict (HEC) at the site-specific scale have proven to be costly and with low efficacy. A shift from reactive to proactive HEC mitigation approaches at the county-wide scale (e.g. a district level, the administrative planning body) may provide opportunities to reconcile such apparent contrasting requirements in Mozambique. The elephant population of Mozambique is fragmented and remnant sub-populations are limited to clusters of protected areas in a matrix of human-dominated landscapes.
  • Manica Tambara Sofala Marromeu Mutarara Manica Cheringoma Sofala Ndoro Chemba Maringue

    Manica Tambara Sofala Marromeu Mutarara Manica Cheringoma Sofala Ndoro Chemba Maringue

    MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14 Data collection period 22 - 25 July 2020 73 sites* 19,628 households 94,220 individuals 17,005 by Cyclone Idai 82,151 by Cyclone Idai 2,623 by floods 12,069 by floods From 22 to 25 July 2020, in close coordination with Mozambique’s National Institute for Disaster Management (INGC), IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) teams conducted multi-sectoral location assessments (MSLA) in resettlement sites in the four provinces affected by Cyclone Idai (March 2019) and the floods (between December 2019 and February 2020). The DTM teams interviewed key informants capturing population estimates, mobility patterns, and multi-sectoral needs and vulnerabilities. Chemba Tete Nkganzo Matundo - unidade Chimbonde Niassa Mutarara Morrumbala Tchetcha 2 Magagade Marara Moatize Cidade de Tete Tchetcha 1 Nhacuecha Tete Tete Changara Mopeia Zambezia Sofala Caia Doa Maringue Guro Panducani Manica Tambara Sofala Marromeu Mutarara Manica Cheringoma Sofala Ndoro Chemba Maringue Gorongosa Gorongosa Mocubela Metuchira Mocuba Landinho Muanza Mussaia Ndedja_1 Sofala Maganja da Costa Nhamatanda Savane Zambezia Brigodo Inhambane Gogodane Mucoa Ronda Digudiua Parreirão Gaza Mutua Namitangurini Namacurra Munguissa 7 Abril - Cura Dondo Nicoadala Mandruzi Maputo Buzi Cidade da Beira Mopeia Maquival Maputo City Grudja (4 de Outubro/Nhabziconja) Macarate Maxiquiri alto/Maxiquiri 1 Sussundenga Maxiquiri 2 Chicuaxa Buzi Mussocosa Geromi Sofala Chibabava Maximedje Muconja Inhajou 2019
  • Situational Analysis on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Tete Province, Mozambique

    Situational Analysis on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Tete Province, Mozambique

    República de Moçambique Governo Provincial de Tete Direção Provincial de Saúde Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Tete, February 2015 Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Rene Loewenson and Sarah Simpson Training and Research Support Centre In co-operation with DPS Tete and Embassy of Denmark Mozambique, February 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Contexts for and trends in social determinants of health equity ............................................ 5 3.1 Tete province and its population ............................................................................................ 5 3.2 Health status distribution and trends ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Environmental assets and challenges for health ................................................................... 9 3.4 The economic context: high growth, high poverty, high inequality ...................................... 11 3.5 Expanding transport, energy, communications infrastructure ............................................
  • Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar

    Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar

    FUNDO DE ENERGIA Energia para todos para Energia CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFÓLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES Edition nd 2 2ª Edição July 2019 Julho de 2019 DO POVO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NM ISO 9001:2008 FUNDO DE ENERGIA CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFOLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES FICHA TÉCNICA COLOPHON Título Title Carteira de Projectos de Energias Renováveis - Recurso Renewable Energy Projects Portfolio - Hydro and Solar Hídrico e Solar Resources Redação Drafting Divisão de Estudos e Planificação Studies and Planning Division Coordenação Coordination Edson Uamusse Edson Uamusse Revisão Revision Filipe Mondlane Filipe Mondlane Impressão Printing Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Tiragem Print run 300 Exemplares 300 Copies Propriedade Property FUNAE – Fundo de Energia FUNAE – Energy Fund Publicação Publication 2ª Edição 2nd Edition Julho de 2019 July 2019 CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS PROJECTS PORTFOLIO RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES PREFÁCIO PREFACE O acesso universal a energia em 2030 será uma realidade no País, Universal access to energy by 2030 will be reality in this country, mercê do “Programa Nacional de Energia para Todos” lançado por thanks to the “National Energy for All Program” launched by Sua Excia Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, Presidente da República de Moçam- His Excellency Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, President of the
  • Environmental and Social Management Framework (Esmf)

    Environmental and Social Management Framework (Esmf)

    REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (MINEDH) IMPROVING LEARNING AND EMPOWERING GIRLS IN MOZAMBIQUE (P172657) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) February, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 1 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 4 SUMARIO EXECUTIVO ................................................................................................................. 8 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 133 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.2. Scope and Objectives of the ESMF................................................................................... 15 1.3. Methodology Used to Develop ESMF .............................................................................. 15 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................. 17 2.1 The Project Area (Geographical Areas Covered) ............................................................ 177 2.2 Project Development Objective (PDO) ............................................................................
  • Manica Province

    Manica Province

    Back to National Overview OVERVIEW FOR MANICA PROVINCE Tanzania Zaire Comoros Malawi Cabo Del g ad o Niassa Zambia Nampul a Tet e Manica Zambezi a Manica Zimbabwe So f al a Madagascar Botswana Gaza Inhambane South Africa Maput o N Swaziland 200 0 200 400 Kilometers Overview for Manica Province 2 The term “village” as used herein has the same meaning as “the term “community” used elsewhere. Schematic of process. MANICA PROVINCE 678 Total Villages C P EXPERT OPINION o m l COLLECTION a n p n o i n n e g TARGET SAMPLE n t 136 Villages VISITED INACCESSIBLE 121 Villages 21 Villages LANDMINE- UNAFFECTED BY AFFECTED NO INTERVIEW LANDMINES 60 Villages 3 Villages 58 Villages 110 Suspected Mined Areas DATA ENTERED INTO D a IMSMA DATABASE t a E C n o t r m y p a MINE IMPACT SCORE (SAC/UNMAS) o n n d e A n t n a HIGH IMPACT MODERATE LOW IMPACT l y 2 Villages IMPACT 45 Villages s i s 13 Villages FIGURE 1. The Mozambique Landmine Impact Survey (MLIS) visited 9 of 10 Districts in Manica. Cidade de Chimoio was not visited, as it is considered by Mozambican authorities not to be landmine-affected. Of the 121 villages visited, 60 identified themselves as landmine-affected, reporting 110 Suspected Mined Areas (SMAs). Twenty-one villages were inaccessible, and three villages could not be found or were unknown to local people. Figure 1 provides an overview of the survey process: village selection; data collection; and data-entry into the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) database, out of which is generated the Mine Impact Score (Appendix I).
  • 21 January 2004

    21 January 2004

    Famine Early Warning Systems Network 21 January 2004 Highlights o Rainfall has been well below normal in much of central and southern Mozambique this season, raising fears of a third consecutive drought year. o In addition, temperatures have been above normal, increasing evaporation rates and reducing soil moisture. o A district-by-district rainfall analysis shows that rainfall totals in much of central and southern region are below 50% of normal for the period. Eastern Inhambane and Gaza Provinces are the worst affected areas with shortfalls ranging from 17 to 29% of normal. In meteorological terms, less than 75% of normal rain over an extended period is considered a drought. More than half of the country meets this definition at present. The effects on agriculture depend on when crops were planted and how much longer the rains continue. o The poor rainfall has already affected agriculture in most of the southern region, where rains start earlier. The first planting has failed in much of the southern region, and households had to replant at least once. The amount of rainfall in January and February will determine whether these second and third plantings will succeed. o In the provinces of Manica, Sofala, and Tete crops are showing signs of marked stress, but because the season starts later and lasts longer in these areas, most plants could recover if substantial rainfall occurs in January and February. Some rains are forecast for mid-January in the central regions. o River and dam levels in areas south of the Save River are below both last year (a drought year) and the longer-term average.
  • MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021

    MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021

    MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021 22,329 IDP 25 assessed sites 88,704 IDPs households Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Naschitenje temporary site, Naschitenje locality in Mueda district DTM activities are supported by: MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Multi-Sectorial Location Assessment (MSLA) report, which presents findings from the International Organization for Migration’s (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Round 2 assessments, aims to enhance understanding of the extent of internal displacements and the needs of affected populations in conflict-affected districts of Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province. The report covers the period from 13 to April 23 2021 and presents trends from 25 assessed sites hosting internally displaced persons across eight districts in Cabo Delgado. In total, 88,704 internally displaced persons (IDPs) or 22,329 households were mapped living in sites assessed during this MSLA. Reported figures, however, exclude displaced individuals living in host community settings. According to DTM Round 11 Baseline, as of March 2021 an estimated 630,241 IDPs were identified in Cabo Delgado. Sites under assessment in this report included relocation centers, temporary or transit centers, and host community extensions as classified by Camp Coordination Camp Management (CCCM) cluster. Given the active and fluid nature of displacement trends in Northern Mozambique, it is important to note that the number of sites or locations with displaced IDPs exceeds the estimated number of sites assessed for this round. The MSLA included an analysis of sector-wide needs, including shelter and non-food items (NFIs), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), food and nutrition, health, education, livelihoods, protection, community engagement and energy.
  • Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP)

    Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP)

    FY 2015 Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for Mozambique. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. 3) Sustainability Index and Dashboard Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” MOZAMBIQUE 2015 Country Operational Plan Strategic Direction Summary 1 | P a g e Definition of Acronyms ACT Accelerating Children's Treatment Initiative ART Antiretroviral Therapy ARV Antiretroviral drugs CCM Country Coordinating Mechanism COP Country Operational Plan CSW Commercial Sex Workers DREAMS Determined, Resilient, AIDS-free, Mentored,
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000644 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA-33660 IDA-3366A MULT-23844) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 4.2 MILLION (US$ 5.6 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 4.1 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized FOR A COASTAL AND MARINE BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PROJECT DECEMBER 2007 AFTEN: Environment and Natural Resources AFTS2: Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective December 12, 2007) Currency Unit = Meticais 24.47 MZN = US$ 1 US$ 1.58 = SRD FISCAL YEAR [January 1 – December 31] ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS Country Assistance Strategy CDS Sustainable Development Center CMBMP Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Management Project CPI Investment Promotion Center CPS Country Partnership Strategy DANIDA Danish International Development Agency DCA Development Credit Agreement DGA Development Grant Agreement DINATUR National Directorate of Tourism DNFFB National Directorate of Forestry and Wildlife DO Development Objective EMCBP2 Environmental Management Capacity Building Project 2 GEF Global Environment Facility GoM Government of Mozambique ICM Integrated Coastal Management ICR Implementation Completion and Results IDA International Development Association IDP Integrated Development Plan INIA Agriculture Research Institution MACEMP Marine and Coastal Environment Management
  • Mozambique Political Process Bulletin Frelimo Wins Another Tainted Election

    Mozambique Political Process Bulletin Frelimo Wins Another Tainted Election

    Mozambique political process bulletin Issue 56 - 28 November 2014 Editor: Joseph Hanlon ([email protected]), Deputy Editor: Adriano Nuvunga, News editor: Teles Ribeiro, Reporter: Idalêncio Sitoê Material may be freely reprinted. Please cite the Bulletin. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Published by CIP and AWEPA CIP, Centro de Integridade Pública AWEPA, the European Parliamentarians with Africa Rua B (1335) Nr. 79, Bairro da Coop (CP 3266) Maputo Rua Licenciado Coutinho 77 (CP 2648) Maputo www.cip.org.mz [email protected] Tel: +258 21 418 603, 21 418 608, 21 418 626 Tel: +258 21 41 66 16, 82 300 33 29 Fax: +258 21 41 66 25 Fax: +258 21 418 604 e-mail: [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Frelimo wins another tainted election Frelimo's Presidential candidate Filipe Nyusi won the 15 October 2014 election with 57% of the vote. Frelimo won 144 of the 250 seats in parliament (Assembleia da República, AR). Afonso Dhlakama came second with 37% and Renamo has 89 seats. The Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM, Movimento Democrático de Déjà vu again Moçambique) won 17 seats and its presidential After the 2009 election we had an article headlined candidate Daviz Simango won 6% of the vote. "Déjà vu - An unnecessarily tainted election". We Results were announced by the National said the Frelimo victory had been "overshadowed Elections Commission on 30 October. There were by unfairness and misconduct. Long term readers 26 other parties and coalitions standing for of this Bulletin will recognise that little has parliament in some provinces; they received 3% of changed in response to harsh criticism of 1999 the vote and won no parliamentary seats.
  • Baseline Study of the Energy Sources/Options and Planning in Manica and Sussundenga Districts of Manica Province, Mozambique

    Baseline Study of the Energy Sources/Options and Planning in Manica and Sussundenga Districts of Manica Province, Mozambique

    Baseline Study of the Energy Sources/Options and Planning in Manica and Sussundenga Districts Of Manica Province, Mozambique Project Report Submitted to: PRACTICAL ACTION SOUTHERN AFRICA 4 LUDLOW ROAD, P.O. BOX 1744 NEWLANDS HARARE, ZIMBABWE. Under the project: ENERGISING THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS – SETTING THE ENABLING ENVIRONMENT (E-MINDSET) IN SOUTHERN AFRICA Edited by Mr. Pedro Wate, Mr. Lasten Mika Prepared by: Pedro Wate Maputo Mozambique E-mail : [email protected] NOVEMBER 2007 INDEX ABOUT THIS BASELINE STUDY ................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE OF STUDY ....................................................................................................... 6 MAIN FINDINGS .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Background and Country Overview .............................................................................. 7 1.1 Governance Systems of Mozambique .................................................................... 10 1.2 Central and Provincial Administration ................................................................... 10 1.3 District Administration .......................................................................................... 11 1.4 Sub-District Structures ..........................................................................................