: TROPICAL AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

Data collection period 22 - 25 July 2020

73 sites* 19,628 households 94,220 individuals 17,005 by Cyclone Idai 82,151 by Cyclone Idai 2,623 by floods 12,069 by floods From 22 to 25 July 2020, in close coordination with Mozambique’s National Institute for Disaster Management (INGC), IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) teams conducted multi-sectoral location assessments (MSLA) in resettlement sites in the four provinces affected by Cyclone Idai (March 2019) and the floods (between December 2019 and February 2020). The DTM teams interviewed key informants capturing population estimates, mobility patterns, and multi-sectoral needs and vulnerabilities.

Chemba Tete Nkganzo Matundo - unidade Chimbonde Niassa Mutarara Morrumbala Tchetcha 2 Magagade Marara Cidade de Tete Tchetcha 1 Nhacuecha Tete Tete Changara Mopeia Zambezia Caia Doa Maringue

Guro Panducani Manica Tambara Sofala Marromeu Mutarara Manica Cheringoma Sofala Ndoro Chemba Maringue

Gorongosa Gorongosa Mocubela Metuchira Mocuba Landinho Muanza Mussaia Ndedja_1 Sofala Maganja da Costa Nhamatanda Savane Zambezia Brigodo Inhambane Gogodane Mucoa Ronda Digudiua Parreirão Gaza Mutua Namitangurini Namacurra Munguissa 7 Abril - Cura Dondo Nicoadala

Mandruzi Buzi Cidade da Beira Mopeia Maquival Maputo City Grudja (4 de Outubro/Nhabziconja)

Macarate Maxiquiri alto/Maxiquiri 1 Sussundenga Maxiquiri 2 Chicuaxa Buzi Mussocosa Geromi Sofala Chibabava Maximedje Muconja Inhajou 2019 Chingemidji Bandua 2019 Estaquinha sede Begaja Bandua sede

Nhanhemba 1 Nhanhemba 2 Madibunhana Mutassa Manhandure Matarara Mucombe Metchisso Zichão Tossene Choma Total families by site Ngurue 25 de Setembro Macocoe Chibue Mateo Manica 921 - 1,594 Sussundenga Chibue 385 - 920 Muoco Chiguendere (Madudo) Mdhala Manhama 2 165 - 384 Magaro Chiruca Magueba Chibabava 22 - 164 Manhama 1 Sofala Javera Muchai Province boundary

Gudza 0 145 290 580 km Nhamississua District boundary

*A new site “Maxiquiri alto 3” was opened in Grudja locality and Grudja (4 de Outubro/Nhabziconja) site in Buzi was split into two by INGC, increasing the number of resettlement sites in the central region to 73. MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14 GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE Manica Sofala Tete Zambezia Of the 73 sites assessed, 82% are located in Sofala and 31 sites 29 sites 3 sites 10 sites Manica provinces 3,588 individuals 13,280 individuals which represent 22,589 individuals 54,763 individuals 82% of the displaced population

Table 1: Number of sites and population by province

Province # Site Total families displaced Total families displaced due to ood Total families Total individuals due to Cyclone Idai (December 2019 - February 2020) Manica 31 4,541 1 50 4,692 22,589 Sofala 29 9,944 1,361 11,304 54,763 Tete 3 708 - 708 3 ,588 Zambezia 10 1,812 1 ,112 2,924 1 3,280 Grand Total 73 17,005 2,623 19,628 94,220

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Female Male Children (0 - 17 years) 52% 4% 3% <1 yr 8% 7% 1-5 yrs Adults 16% 14% 6-17 yrs (18 - 59 years) 43% 18-59 yrs 22% 21% 60+ yrs 3% 2% Elderly (60+ years) Total 53% 47% 5% Figure 1: Population by age groups and gender Figure 2: Percentage of population by age groups

PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY STATUS 72% 12%

Of the 73 resettlements sites assessed, 74 per cent Limited access (only 4x4 vehicles) 14% (16,424 households in 54 sites) are fully accessible Limited access (only by boat) while the remaining 26 per cent (3,204 households Accessible 28% in 19 sites) can only be accessed either by a boat or 74%

4x4 vehicle. In the event of a natural disaster, 28 per Accessible Inaccessible cent of the resettlement sites (4,498 households in Figure 3: a) Accessibility status b) Accessibility in event of disaster 15 sites) would become inaccessible.

URGENT NEEDS Of the 73 resettlement sites assessed, 44 per cent reported food as their main need (representing 10,235 households in 32 sites) followed by shelter 44% 34% 10% (34%, representing 5,037 households in 25 sites), and water (10%, representing 1,915 households in 7 sites).

Figure 4: Urgent needs

2 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

ORIGIN OF DISPLACED FAMILIES

All the families living in the resettlement sites originated from the districts of their resettlement location as illustrated in the figure below:

District of origin District of displacement Resettlement site

Bandua 2019: 866 Bandua sede: 442 Begaja: 210 Chingemidji: 446 Estaquinha sede: 299 Inhajou 2019: 446 From Buzi: 6,166 Buzi: 6,166 Machonjova: 512 Maximedje: 189 Maxiquiri 2: 266 Maxiquiri alto 3: 155 Maxiquiri alto/Maxiquiri 1: 1,863 Mussocosa: 42 Nhamacunta: 430 Magagade: 175 Ndoro: 200 From Caia: 992 Caia: 992 Nhacuecha: 215 Tchetcha 1: 218 Tchetcha 2: 184 Chicuaxa: 551 Geromi: 384 From Chibabava: 1,806 Chibabava: 1,806 Macarate: 461 Mdhala: 160 Muconja: 250 From Cidade de Tete: 565 Cidade de Tete: 565 Matundo - unidade Chimbonde: 565 Savane: 264 From Cidade da Beira: 264 Mandruzi: 375 Dondo: 1,333 Mutua: 694 From Dondo: 1,069 Landinho: 300 From Maganja da Costa: 1,394 Maganja da Costa: 1,394 Mussaia: 668 Parreirão: 426 Nkganzo: 63 From Mutarara: 143 Mutarara: 143 Panducani: 80 Brigodo: 481 Gogodane: 42 From Namacurra: 1,119 Namacurra: 1,119 Mucoa: 125 Munguissa: 209 Ronda: 262 7 Abril - Cura: 162 Metuchira: 370 From Nhamatanda: 1,007 Nhamatanda: 1,007 Ndedja_1: 475 Digudiua: 193 From Nicoadala: 411 Nicoadala: 411 Namitangurini: 218 25 de Setembro: 163 Bairro da unidade: 322 Chibue: 154 Chibue Mateo: 98 Chiruca: 30 Gudza: 144 Javera: 30 Machacuari: 22 Macocoe: 148 Madibunhana: 196 Magaro: 203 Magueba: 120 Manhama 1: 90 Manhama 2: 263 Manhandure: 97 Matarara: 195 From Sussundenga: 4,692 Sussundenga: 4,692 Metchisso: 217 Minas Gerais: 142 Muawa: 262 Muchai: 56 Muchambanha: 56 Mucombe: 143 Muoco Chiguendere (Madudo): 72 Mutassa: 36 Ngurue: 138 Nhamississua: 46 Nhanhemba 1: 548 Nhanhemba 2: 260 Tossene Choma: 339 Zibuia: 61 Zichão: 41

Figure 5: Origin of families in resettlement sites

3 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

SHELTER/NFI

In the 73 resettlement sites assessed, 67 per cent (13,169 households) are living in emergency shelter whilst the remaining 33 per cent (6,459 households) are living in permanent shelter.

The top three NFI items needed but not accessible to internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the site are: 1) items for sleeping (mats, blankets) in 62 sites, 2) cooking items (pots/pans) in 44 sites, and 3) mosquito nets in 33 sites. All the assessed resettlement sites (up from 77% when compared with previous round) reported not being able to access needed NFIs due to lack of financial means. Emergency shelter Permanent shelter Namacurra-Ronda Maganja da Costa-Parreirão Nicoadala-Namitangurini Maganja da Costa-Mussaia Zambezia Namacurra-Munguissa Namacurra-Mucoa 2,924 families Maganja da Costa-Landinho Namacurra-Gogodane Nicoadala-Digudiua Namacurra-Brigodo Mutarara-Panducani 708 families Mutarara-Nkganzo Tete Cidade de Tete-Matundo - unidade Chimbonde Caia-Tchetcha 2 Caia-Tchetcha 1 Dondo-Savane Buzi-Nhamacunta Caia-Nhacuecha Caia-Ndoro Nhamatanda-Ndedja_1 Dondo-Mutua Sofala Buzi-Mussocosa Chibabava-Muconja 11,304 families Nhamatanda-Metuchira Chibabava-Mdhala Buzi-Maxiquiri alto/Maxiquiri 1 Buzi-Maxiquiri alto 3 Buzi-Maxiquiri 2 Buzi-Maximedje Dondo-Mandruzi Caia-Magagade Buzi-Machonjova Chibabava-Macarate Buzi-Inhajou 2019 61% of families in ’s resettlement Chibabava-Geromi Buzi-Estaquinha sede sites live in emergency shelters Buzi-Chingemidji Chibabava-Chicuaxa Buzi-Begaja Buzi-Bandua sede Buzi-Bandua 2019 Nhamatanda-7 Abril - Cura Sussundenga-Zichão Sussundenga-Zibuia Sussundenga-Tossene Choma Sussundenga-Nhanhemba 2 Sussundenga-Nhanhemba 1 Sussundenga-Nhamississua Sussundenga-Ngurue Sussundenga-Mutassa Sussundenga-Muoco Chiguendere (Madudo) Sussundenga-Mucombe Sussundenga-Muchambanha Sussundenga-Muchai Sussundenga-Muawa Manica Sussundenga-Minas Gerais Sussundenga-Metchisso 4,692 families Sussundenga-Matarara Sussundenga-Manhandure Sussundenga-Manhama 2 Sussundenga-Manhama 1 Sussundenga-Magueba Sussundenga-Magaro Sussundenga-Madibunhana 92% of families in ’s Sussundenga-Macocoe Sussundenga-Machacuari resettlement sites live in emergency shelters Sussundenga-Javera Sussundenga-Gudza Sussundenga-Chiruca Sussundenga-Chibue Mateo Sussundenga-Chibue Sussundenga-Bairro da unidade Sussundenga-25 de Setembro 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 Number of families Emergency shelter Permanent shelter Figure 6: Number of families living in resettlement by site and shelter type 4 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

Mosquito nets 33 sites

67% 33% Cooking items 44 sites Emergency shelter Permanent shelter Items for sleeping 62 sites

Figure 7: a) Type of shelter in the assessed sites b) Top three NFI needs

WASH

The assessment shows that 67 per cent of the latrines on sites are individual latrines (used by one to two families) whilst the remaining 33 per cent are communal latrines (used by many families). Ninety-five per cent of resettlement sites assessed (19,455 households in 69 sites, up from 64 sites when compared with previous assessment) reported having access to functional latrines on sites whilst the remaining five per cent (207 households) reporting no access to functional latrines are: Javera and Muoco Chiguendere (Madudo) sites in of Manica province; Nkganzo site in of ; and Gogodane site in Namaccura district of Zambezia province.

Seventy-four per cent of sites assessed (13,648 households in 58 sites) reported using hand pumps as their main source of water, followed by 11 per cent open well (4,076 households in 9 sites), 10 per cent using small water system (4,621 households in 8 sites), and 5 per cent other (1,121 households in 4 sites).

74% 11% Water pump Open well 10% Small water system

Figure 8: Water sources

5 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

FOOD SECURITY

Of the 73 resettlement sites assessed, 37 per cent (up from 34% when compared with previous assessment) reported having access to a functioning market (11,543 households in 27 sites). The 63 per cent of sites that reported not having access to a functioning market (8,119 households in 46 sites) are located in: Sussundenga in Manica province; Caia, Chibabava, and Nhamatanda districts in Sofala province; Cidade de Tete and Mutarara districts in Tete province; Namacurra and Nicoadala districts in Zambezia.

Ninety-five per cent (19,259 households in 69 sites) of sites reported receiving food distribution, the remaining four sites that reported not receiving food distribution are: Javera and Minas Gerais sites located in Sussundenga district of Manica province; Maxiguiri Alto 3 site in of Sofala province; and Gogodane site in of Zambezia province. Of the sites that reported food distribution, 42 per cent (7,563 households in 29 sites) received one in the last seven days, 28 per cent (5,459 households in 19 sites) received one in the last 14 days, 13 per cent (2,681 households in 9 sites) received one more than two weeks ago, and 17 per cent (3,590 households in 12 sites) received one more than one month ago. 13%

17% 42% 9 5%

28%

5% Last 7 days Last 14 days N o Y es More than one month More than two weeks Figure 9 a) Food distribution in sites b) Frequencies of distribution

HEALTH

Of the 73 resettlement sites assessed, 41 per cent (11,775 households in 30 sites, up from 18% when compared with previous round) reported having access to healthcare services on-site, whilst the remaining 59 per cent (7,833 households in 43 sites) access healthcare off-site. Of the sites that access healthcare off-site, 65 per cent require more than 60 minutes walk to the nearest health facility, 28 per cent can reach the health facility within 31-60 minutes, 7 per cent within 16-30 minutes. The sites that require more than 60 minutes walk are located in: Sussundenga district (16 sites) in Manica province; Buzi (1 sites), Caia (3 sites) and Chibabava (3 sites) districts in Sofala; Mutarara district (1 site) in Tete province; and Namacurra (1 site), and Nicoadala (1 site) districts in Zambezia province.

More than 60 minutes 65% 59% of healthcare centres are off-site 59% 31 - 60 minutes 28% 16 - 30 minutes 7%

Figure 10 a). Health care facility locations b). Time spent in reaching the closest health facility Of the 41 per cent of resettlement sites with access to health facilities on-site, 51 per cent (19 sites) have access to mobile clinic, 41 per cent (15 sites) have on-site clinic, and 8 per cent can access ambulance service (3 sites). 51% 41% 8%

Mobile clinic On-site clinic Ambulance service Figure 11: Health care facility types 6 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

EDUCATION

All the assessed sites reported that the majority of the primary school aged children have access to primary school but of the primary schools 16% accessible by the individuals on-site, only 38 per cent are functional. The 62 per cent of sites (10,909 households in 45 sites) which report non-functional primary schools are located in: Sussundenga district (26 sites) in Manica province; Buzi (5 sites), Chibabava (3 sites), Dondo (3 sites) and Nhamatanda (3 sites) districts in Sofala; Cidade de Tete (1 site) in Tete province; Maganja da Costa (2 sites), Namacurra (1 site) and Nicoadala (1 site) districts in Zambezia province. 84% Of the 73 sites assessed, only 37 per cent (9,182 households in 27 sites) have access to secondary school. The sites that have no access to secondary school are located in: Sussundenga district (26 sites) in Does not read neither write Reads and writes moderately Manica province; Caia (5 sites), Chibava (5 sites), and Dondo (1 site) Figure 12: Literacy level of majority of households districts in Sofala; Cidade de Tete (1 site) in Tete province; Maganja da in this site Costa (2 sites), Namacurra (5 sites), and Nicoadala (1 site) districts in Zambezia province.

PROTECTION

Of the 73 resettlement sites assessed, 30 per cent (8,811 households in 22 sites) reported the presence of a protection desk on site. The remaining 70 per cent without protection desks (10,817 households in 51 sites) are located in: Sussudenga district (23 sites) in Manica province; Buzi (5 sites), Caia (5 sites), Chibabava (5 sites) and Dondo (1 sites) districts all in Sofala province; Cidade de Tete (1 site) and Mutarara (2 sites) districts in Tete province; and Maganja de Costa (2 sites) Namacurra (5 sites) and Nicoadala (2 sites) districts all in Zambezia province.

Safety community committee 41%

Police and protection community committees 38%

Police 12%

Not available 8%

Figure 13: Structure where people can report incidents (crime, conflict and disputes, violence, abduction, etc.)

7 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE IDAI AND FLOODS MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 14

LIVELIHOOD

Ninety-nine per cent (up from 97% when compared 1% with previous assessment) of resettlement sites assessed (19,063 households in 72 sites) have access to farming 7% land. The remaining one per cent with no access is Matundo - Unidade Chimbonde site, located in Cidade 22% de Tete district of Tete province. Of the farmers that have access to farmland, 81 per cent (16,626 households in 58 sites) have received agriculture inputs (seeds and tools) and the 19 per cent (2,437 households in 14 sites) that have not agriculture inputs are located in: Sussundenga district (9 sites) in Manica province; Buzi (1 site), Caia (1 69% site) and Chibava (1 site) districts in Sofala province and

Namacurra (2 sites) district in Tete province. > 3 hrs <1 hr 2-3 hrs 1-2 hrs Figure 14: Time taken to reach farmland from the assessed sites

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Eighty-two per cent of resettlement sites assessed (16,243 households in 60 sites) reported that there are volunteers conducting social mobilization activities on site. The top three sectors of mobilization activities were reported as WASH (41sites), Health (39 sites) and, PSEA (21 sites). The 18 per cent (3,385 households) that report no social mobilization volunteers on site are located in: Buzi district in Sofala province; Sussundenga district (2 sites) in Manica province; Buzi (3 sites) and Chibabava (2 sites) districts in Sofala province; and Namacurra (5 site) and Nicoadala districts (1 site) in Zambezia province.

According to respondents, the three most common channels used by communities to reach the humanitarian organizations are: local government office (64 sites), community leader or group (49 sites), and /staff from humanitarian agencies (32 sites). In the other direction, organizations communicate with communities mainly through local government office (69 sites) community leader or group (57 sites), and staff from humanitarian agencies (36 sites).

When asked if the majority of family members have legal documentation (birth certificate, ID, etc.), 74 per cent (12,200 households in 54 sites) responded no, whilst the remaining 26 per cent (7,428 households in 19 sites) report having legal documentation.

8 METHODOLOGY

To ensure a more robust and targeted response for the humanitarian community, DTM provides key information and critical insights into the situation on internally displaced persons (IDPs), affected persons and returning populations across the affected areas. Specifically, DTM implements four component activities:

1) Daily Monitoring: rapid daily assessments of IDP population numbers (individuals & households) at accommodation centres and resettlement sites. 2) Multi-Sectoral Location Assessment: multi-sector assessment at resettlement sites providing in-depth information on mobility, needs, and vulnerabilities. 3) Baseline Locality Assessment: multi-sector assessment of affected localities to determine the number of affected populations and returnees along with basic shelter and access to service information. 4) Thematic Survey: DTM conducts surveys to provide a deeper understanding of the intentions/perceptions of populations of concern and to describe communities’ socio-economic characteristics. DTM surveys are carried out on a sample of the population.

For this assessment, resettlement sites are defined as sites where populations have voluntarily move to after staying in accommodation centres. Since all accommodation centres have formally closed, DTM activities continue in the remaining resettlement sites.

The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names, and related data shown on maps and included in this report are not warranted to be error free nor do they imply judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries by IOM.

For more information or to report an alert, please contact: [email protected]

DTM information products: http://displacement.iom.int/mozambique

DTM activities are supported by