DOCSLIB.ORG

Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique Report | no. 360 Report | no. Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Since 2006, the UNICEF–Netherlands Partnership evaluation office. It found evidence of a large Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation has increase in the use of improved water sources been supporting Water Supply and Sanitation and in the ownership and use of latrines. Much of programmes in Mozambique. The largest the increase can be attributed to an innovative programme, the ‘One Million Initiative’ aims to approach to sanitation. However, water from bring improved sanitation and clean water to improved sources and even more importantly, over one million people in rural Mozambique. stored water, are not always safe to drink. An Half-way through the programme, a joint impact element of subsidy will continue to be needed to evaluation was carried out by IOB and UNICEF’s sustain facilities and services. More than Water Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) P.O. box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl/iob © Ministry of Foreign Affairs | October 2011| ISBN 978-90-5328-414-8 11Buz283729 | E This project was a product of a cooperation between: Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique More than Water Mid-term impact evaluation: UNICEF – Government of The Netherlands Partnership for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene ‘One Million Initiative’, Mozambique Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Preface Drinking water supply and basic sanitation has been a priority for the Netherlands’ development co-operation and for UNICEF for many years. Current attention is guided by the international consensus on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). MDG 7 includes the target to halve, by 2015, the proportion of people in 1990 without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation. Since 2006 the Netherlands supports UNICEF programmes through the UNICEF- Netherlands Partnership Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. The biggest programme is the UNICEF/Government of the Netherlands/ Government of Mozambique water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion programme “One Million Initiative” in rural areas in the provinces Manica, Sofala and Tete. Mozambique is both for the Netherlands and for UNICEF a partner country to which for many years substantial support to water supply and sanitary facilities has been provided. The Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the UNICEF Evaluation Office, in close cooperation with UNICEF Mozambique, conducted a mid-term impact evaluation of the on-going programme. A follow up impact study is envisaged at the end of the programme in 2013. | 3 | The objective of the support to water supply and sanitary facilities goes beyond sustainable access to facilities: it aims to reduce the burden of water collection (typically a task for women and girls), improve health, raise school enrolment and attendance, improve livelihoods and, ultimately, reduce poverty. The for Mozambique innovative UNICEF Community Approach to Total Sanitation (CATS) made the study particularly interesting. Special attention is paid to drinking water quality at the source and at point of use and to linkages between water supply, sanitation and hygiene behaviour. In addition the report reviews some major challenges to reinforce sustainability. There is a worldwide consensus on the impacts of programmes for water supply and sanitary facilities; conventional evaluation studies do not, however, normally quantify these. The impact evaluation has used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods and techniques. Through such an evaluation both Evaluation Departments wish to explore how the effects of these programs can be measured. For the Netherlands the study is the fifth in a series of impact evaluations of water supply and sanitation programs in different countries. Rita Tesselaar of IOB was overall responsible for the impact evaluation, in coordination with Samuel Bickel of the UNICEF Evaluation Office, and in close cooperation with Samuel Godfrey, head of programme at the UNICEF Mozambique Office and Mr. Americo Muianga, programme coordinator of the Directorate of Water, Government of Mozambique. The main research consultants for the study were Jan Willem Gunning and Chris Elbers, Professors of Development Economics at the VU University Amsterdam; Dr. Stephen Turner, senior consultant in Resource Development and Belis Matabire, national consultant in water supply and sanitation. The household, community and water point surveys were Preface implemented by the agency WE Consult, through the UNICEF Mozambique Office. The study benefited from information and comments on draft versions of the report received from the Directorate of Water, staff of the UNICEF Mozambique Office, Paul Eduards of UNICEF headquarters, Dr. Christine Sijbesma of the IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, Antonie de Kemp and Henri Jorritsma of IOB, Dick van Ginhoven of the responsible policy department of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Felix Hoogveld of the Netherlands Embassy in Maputo. Thanks are also due to all other infor- mants and last but certainly not least, all the respondents to the survey questionnaires and participants of group interviews. Special thanks are due to the water supply and sanitation team of the UNICEF Mozambique Office for their information, advice and support through- out the study. IOB and UNICEF Evaluation Office bear responsibility for the contents of the report. Prof. Dr. Ruerd Ruben Director IOB Colin Kirk Director UNICEF Evaluation Office | 4 | Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Contents Preface 3 Tables 7 Figures 9 Abbreviations 10 Main findings and issues 12 1 Background and methodology 22 1.1 Purpose and focus of the impact evaluation 23 1.2 Key evaluation questions 27 1.3 Methodology 29 1.4 Structure of the report 31 2 Problem and context 32 2.1 Demography and society 33 2.2 Natural environment 34 2.3 Economy and poverty 35 2.4 Health and nutrition 36 2.5 Water and sanitation policy and institutional context 38 | 5 | 2.6 External funding agencies’ policy and support to rural water and sanitation 41 2.7 Summary 43 3 The One Million Initiative, 2006-2013 46 3.1 Objectives 47 3.2 Approach and activities 48 3.3 Institutional strategy 57 3.4 Outputs to date 61 3.5 Costs 65 3.6 Summary 66 4 Impact analysis 70 4.1 Introduction 71 4.2 Data and Methodology 71 4.3 Water interventions of the One Million Initiative 74 4.4 Sanitation and hygiene - related interventions of the One Million Initiative 90 4.5 Health impact of the One Million Initiative 102 4.6 The One Million Initiative and Education 105 4.7 Summary 111 5 Sustainability assessment 114 5.1 Introduction 115 5.2 Policy and institutional arrangements 116 5.3 Institutional capacity 118 5.4 Other factors affecting sustainability 123 Contents 5.5 Monitoring 127 5.6 Summary 129 Annexes 134 Annex 1 Terms of reference 135 Annex 2 Estimating the number of newly realised water points under the One Million Initiative 152 Annex 3 Sampling design 155 Annex 4 References 163 | 6 | Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Tables Table 1 Manica, Sofala and Tete provinces: demographic data 33 Table 2 Poverty headcount, 1996-97, 2002-03 and 2008-09 36 Table 3 Selected health and nutrition indicators, 1997 and 2003 36 Table 4 Selected health and nutrition indicators, 2008 37 Table 5 Percentage of persons aged 15-49 testing HIV positive, Manica, Sofala and Tete, 2000 - 2007 37 Table 6 One Million Initiative ODF awards, 2008 and 2009-10 52 Table 7 New water points and beneficiaries, 2008 - 2010 62 Table 8 Number of new water points, estimated from survey data 63 Table 9 New latrines and beneficiaries, 2008 - 2010 63 Table 10 ODF communities, 2008 – 2010 64 Table 11 Communities planned for CATS evaluation, evaluated, declared ODF, 2010 64 Table 12 School water supplies and latrines, 2007 - 2010 65 Table 13 Budget of the One Million Initiative 65 Table 14 Improved water points in survey locations 76 Table 15 Access to improved water points 77 Table 16 Percentage of households using improved water sources as their main source of drinking water. 78 | 7 | Table 17 Households response to water point intervention (number of households) 78 Table 18 Change in use of improved water sources caused by change in availability of improved water sources and / or CATS intervention 79 Table 19 Payment mode for user charges for improved water sources 80 Table 20 Monthly payment according to water committee 81 Table 21 User charges 81 Table 22 Determinants of using improved sources of drinking water 82 Table 23 Changes in Water Quality at Source 84 Table 24 CFU Count at Source (2010) 84 Table 25 Water quality: subjective and objective 2010 85 Table 26 Perceived water quality determines switch to improved sources 85 Table 27 Water safety at point of use 86 Table 28 Trends in water consumption 87 Table 29 Water consumption and perceived water quality 88 Table 30 Water collection time 89 Table 31 Latrine Ownership and CATS intervention 90 Table 32 Open Defecation Practice and CATS intervention (changes 2008-2010. % points)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where Crime Compounds Conflict
    WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities SIMONE HAYSOM October 2018 WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities Simone Haysom October 2018 Cover photo: iStock/Katiekk2 Pemba, Mozambique: ranger with a gun looking at feet of elephants after poachers had killed the animals for illegal ivory trade © 2018 Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Global Initiative. Please direct inquiries to: The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime WMO Building, 2nd Floor 7bis, Avenue de la Paix CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.GlobalInitiative.net Contents Summary and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................1 Background .........................................................................................................................................................................................2 The militants and funding from the illicit economy .......................................................................................4 Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 Corrosion, grievance and opportunity: A detailed picture
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape Approach to Elephant Conservation in Mozambique
    A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique by Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria February 2012 i © University of Pretoria A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique Student: Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Supervisor: Professor Rudi J. van Aarde Conservation Ecology Research Unit Department of Zoology & Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria 0002 rjvaardezoology.up.ac.za Co-supervisor: Dr Sam M. Ferreira Scientific Services South African National Parks Skukuza 1350 South Africa Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) ii Abstract People and elephants share landscapes throughout Mozambique. Here elephant conservation management focuses on protected areas but fails to address the conflict that exists between elephants and people. In this thesis I develop a landscape approach to conflict mitigation that is designed to accommodate the needs of people and of elephants in human-dominated landscapes. Mozambique faces a dilemma: politically it is required to reduce poverty while at the same time adhere to international agreements and requirements to protect biodiversity with relatively scarce financial resources. Reactive mitigation of human-elephant conflict (HEC) at the site-specific scale have proven to be costly and with low efficacy. A shift from reactive to proactive HEC mitigation approaches at the county-wide scale (e.g. a district level, the administrative planning body) may provide opportunities to reconcile such apparent contrasting requirements in Mozambique. The elephant population of Mozambique is fragmented and remnant sub-populations are limited to clusters of protected areas in a matrix of human-dominated landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Documents
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No.: 84667-MZ Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE DECENTRALIZED PLANNING AND FINANCE PROJECT (IDA-HO670-MOZ) February 18, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized IEG Public Sector Evaluation Independent Evaluation Group Public Disclosure Authorized ii Currency Equivalents (annual averages) Currency Unit = Mozambican metical (MZM) 2004 US$1.00 MZN 22,144.71 2005 US$1.00 MZN 22,850.81 2006 US$1.00 MZN 25,758.32 (January to July) 2006 US$1.00 MZN 25.89 (July to December) 2007 US$1.00 MZN 25.79 2008 US$1.00 MZN 24.19 2009 US$1.00 MZN 27.58 2010 US$1.00 MZN 34.24 Abbreviations and Acronyms CCAGG Concerned Citizens of Abra for Good Government CPIA Country Program and Institutional Assessments DGA Development Grant Agreement DPFP Decentralized Planning and Finance Project FCA Fundo de Compensação Autárquica FIL Fundo de Iniciativa Local FRELIMO Frente de Libertação de Moçambique GTZ German Technical Cooperation ICR Implementation Completion Report IDA International Development Association IEG Independent Evaluation Group IEGPS IEG Public Sector Evaluation M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOPH Ministry of Public Works and Housing MOZ Mozambique NDPFP National Decentralized Planning and Finance Project PAD Project Appraisal document PARPA Action Plan for Reduction of Absolute Poverty PEDD Plano Estratégico de Desenvolvimento Distrital PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PESOD Plano Económico Social e Orçamento Distrital PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report PRSCs Poverty Reduction Strategy Credits PSRP Public Sector Reform Project UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDP United Nations Development Program UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund Fiscal Year Government: January I - December 31 Acting Director-General, Independent Evaluation Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) As Described by Ex-Patticipants
    The Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) as Described by Ex-patticipants Research Report Submitted to: Ford Foundation and Swedish International Development Agency William Minter, Ph.D. Visiting Researcher African Studies Program Georgetown University Washington, DC March, 1989 Copyright Q 1989 by William Minter Permission to reprint, excerpt or translate this report will be granted provided that credit is given rind a copy sent to the author. For more information contact: William Minter 1839 Newton St. NW Washington, DC 20010 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION the top levels of the ruling Frelirno Party, local party and government officials helped locate amnestied ex-participants For over a decade the Mozambican National Resistance and gave access to prisoners. Selection was on the basis of the (Renamo, or MNR) has been the principal agent of a desuuctive criteria the author presented: those who had spent more time as war against independent Mozambique. The origin of the group Renamo soldiers. including commanders, people with some as a creation of the Rhodesian government in the mid-1970s is education if possible, adults rather than children. In a number of well-documented, as is the transfer of sponsorship to the South cases, the author asked for specific individuals by name, previ- African government after white Rhodesia gave way to inde- ously identified from the Mozambican press or other sources. In pendent Zimbabwe in 1980. no case were any of these refused, although a couple were not The results of the war have attracted increasing attention geographically accessible. from the international community in recent years. In April 1988 Each interview was carried out individually, out of hearing the report written by consultant Robert Gersony for the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Situational Analysis on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Tete Province, Mozambique
    República de Moçambique Governo Provincial de Tete Direção Provincial de Saúde Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Tete, February 2015 Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Rene Loewenson and Sarah Simpson Training and Research Support Centre In co-operation with DPS Tete and Embassy of Denmark Mozambique, February 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Contexts for and trends in social determinants of health equity ............................................ 5 3.1 Tete province and its population ............................................................................................ 5 3.2 Health status distribution and trends ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Environmental assets and challenges for health ................................................................... 9 3.4 The economic context: high growth, high poverty, high inequality ...................................... 11 3.5 Expanding transport, energy, communications infrastructure ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4: Regional Development Plan
    PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area The Study on Upgrading of Nampula – Cuamba Road FINAL REPORT in the Republic of Mozambique November 2007 PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area 1.1 Existing Conditions of the Study Area The Study area consists of the two provinces of Niassa and Nampula. The total length of the Study road is approximately 350 km. In this chapter, overall conditions of the study area are described in order to prepare a regional development plan and to analyze economic, social and financial viability. The Nacala Corridor, which extends to Malawi through the Nampula and Niassa Provinces of Mozambique from Nacala Port, serves as a trucking route that connects northern agricultural zones with important cities and/or towns. In the rainy season, which is from November to April, the region has a high rainfall ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 mm. As the Study road is an unpaved road, it is frequently impassable during the rainy season, affecting the transportation of crops during this period. Looking at the 3 regions in Mozambique, results of the economic performance study conducted by UNDP over the period under analysis continue to show heavy economic concentration in the southern region of the country, with an average of about 47% of real production as can be seen in Figure 1.1.1. Within the southern region, Maputo City stands out with a contribution in real terms of about 20.8%. The central region follows, with a contribution of 32%, and finally, the northern region with only 21% of national production.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar
    FUNDO DE ENERGIA Energia para todos para Energia CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFÓLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES Edition nd 2 2ª Edição July 2019 Julho de 2019 DO POVO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NM ISO 9001:2008 FUNDO DE ENERGIA CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFOLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES FICHA TÉCNICA COLOPHON Título Title Carteira de Projectos de Energias Renováveis - Recurso Renewable Energy Projects Portfolio - Hydro and Solar Hídrico e Solar Resources Redação Drafting Divisão de Estudos e Planificação Studies and Planning Division Coordenação Coordination Edson Uamusse Edson Uamusse Revisão Revision Filipe Mondlane Filipe Mondlane Impressão Printing Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Tiragem Print run 300 Exemplares 300 Copies Propriedade Property FUNAE – Fundo de Energia FUNAE – Energy Fund Publicação Publication 2ª Edição 2nd Edition Julho de 2019 July 2019 CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS PROJECTS PORTFOLIO RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES PREFÁCIO PREFACE O acesso universal a energia em 2030 será uma realidade no País, Universal access to energy by 2030 will be reality in this country, mercê do “Programa Nacional de Energia para Todos” lançado por thanks to the “National Energy for All Program” launched by Sua Excia Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, Presidente da República de Moçam- His Excellency Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, President of the
    [Show full text]
  • Manica Province
    Back to National Overview OVERVIEW FOR MANICA PROVINCE Tanzania Zaire Comoros Malawi Cabo Del g ad o Niassa Zambia Nampul a Tet e Manica Zambezi a Manica Zimbabwe So f al a Madagascar Botswana Gaza Inhambane South Africa Maput o N Swaziland 200 0 200 400 Kilometers Overview for Manica Province 2 The term “village” as used herein has the same meaning as “the term “community” used elsewhere. Schematic of process. MANICA PROVINCE 678 Total Villages C P EXPERT OPINION o m l COLLECTION a n p n o i n n e g TARGET SAMPLE n t 136 Villages VISITED INACCESSIBLE 121 Villages 21 Villages LANDMINE- UNAFFECTED BY AFFECTED NO INTERVIEW LANDMINES 60 Villages 3 Villages 58 Villages 110 Suspected Mined Areas DATA ENTERED INTO D a IMSMA DATABASE t a E C n o t r m y p a MINE IMPACT SCORE (SAC/UNMAS) o n n d e A n t n a HIGH IMPACT MODERATE LOW IMPACT l y 2 Villages IMPACT 45 Villages s i s 13 Villages FIGURE 1. The Mozambique Landmine Impact Survey (MLIS) visited 9 of 10 Districts in Manica. Cidade de Chimoio was not visited, as it is considered by Mozambican authorities not to be landmine-affected. Of the 121 villages visited, 60 identified themselves as landmine-affected, reporting 110 Suspected Mined Areas (SMAs). Twenty-one villages were inaccessible, and three villages could not be found or were unknown to local people. Figure 1 provides an overview of the survey process: village selection; data collection; and data-entry into the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) database, out of which is generated the Mine Impact Score (Appendix I).
    [Show full text]
  • MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021
    MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021 22,329 IDP 25 assessed sites 88,704 IDPs households Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Naschitenje temporary site, Naschitenje locality in Mueda district DTM activities are supported by: MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Multi-Sectorial Location Assessment (MSLA) report, which presents findings from the International Organization for Migration’s (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Round 2 assessments, aims to enhance understanding of the extent of internal displacements and the needs of affected populations in conflict-affected districts of Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province. The report covers the period from 13 to April 23 2021 and presents trends from 25 assessed sites hosting internally displaced persons across eight districts in Cabo Delgado. In total, 88,704 internally displaced persons (IDPs) or 22,329 households were mapped living in sites assessed during this MSLA. Reported figures, however, exclude displaced individuals living in host community settings. According to DTM Round 11 Baseline, as of March 2021 an estimated 630,241 IDPs were identified in Cabo Delgado. Sites under assessment in this report included relocation centers, temporary or transit centers, and host community extensions as classified by Camp Coordination Camp Management (CCCM) cluster. Given the active and fluid nature of displacement trends in Northern Mozambique, it is important to note that the number of sites or locations with displaced IDPs exceeds the estimated number of sites assessed for this round. The MSLA included an analysis of sector-wide needs, including shelter and non-food items (NFIs), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), food and nutrition, health, education, livelihoods, protection, community engagement and energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP)
    FY 2015 Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for Mozambique. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. 3) Sustainability Index and Dashboard Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” MOZAMBIQUE 2015 Country Operational Plan Strategic Direction Summary 1 | P a g e Definition of Acronyms ACT Accelerating Children's Treatment Initiative ART Antiretroviral Therapy ARV Antiretroviral drugs CCM Country Coordinating Mechanism COP Country Operational Plan CSW Commercial Sex Workers DREAMS Determined, Resilient, AIDS-free, Mentored,
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique: 2021-2023
    IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Publisher: International Organization for Migration 139, Rua Joseph Kizerbo Maputo Mozambique Email: [email protected] Website: mozambique.iom.int This publication was issued without formal editing by IOM. Report design by We2 – www.we2.co Cover photo: IOM‘s DTM teams help local authorities in Paquitequete, Pemba, register internally displaced persons who fled insecurity in northern Cabo Delgado. From 16 October to 11 November 2020, over 14,400 internally displaced persons arrived at Pemba’s Paquitequete beach by boat. Boat arrivals to the provincial capital peaked with 29 in a single day in late October. © IOM 2021/Matteo THEUBET Required Citation: International Organization for Migration (IOM), 2021. IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique 2021-2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Bds Needs Assessment in Nacala and Beira Corridor
    USAID AgriFUTURO Mozambique Agribusiness and Trade Competitiveness Program Business Development Services Needs Assessment FINAL REPORT June 2010 By: Carlos Fumo (Senior Expert) TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. Note of Thanks .............................................................................................. 3 1. Acronyms and abbreviations.......................................................................... 4 2. General introduction ...................................................................................... 6 2.1. Background and introduction ................................................................. 6 3. Overall objectives of the Assessment ............................................................ 7 4. Deliverables ................................................................................................... 8 5. Methodology .................................................................................................. 8 5.1. Secondary Research .................................................................................. 9 5.2. Primary Research ................................................................................... 9 5.3. Data analysis and report writing ........................................................... 11 5.4. Sampling ............................................................................................... 11 6. The needs assessment process .................................................................. 13 7. The limitations of the study .........................................................................
    [Show full text]