MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021 22,329 IDP 25 assessed sites 88,704 IDPs households Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Naschitenje temporary site, Naschitenje locality in Mueda district DTM activities are supported by: MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Multi-Sectorial Location Assessment (MSLA) report, which presents findings from the International Organization for Migration’s (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Round 2 assessments, aims to enhance understanding of the extent of internal displacements and the needs of affected populations in conflict-affected districts of Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province. The report covers the period from 13 to April 23 2021 and presents trends from 25 assessed sites hosting internally displaced persons across eight districts in Cabo Delgado. In total, 88,704 internally displaced persons (IDPs) or 22,329 households were mapped living in sites assessed during this MSLA. Reported figures, however, exclude displaced individuals living in host community settings. According to DTM Round 11 Baseline, as of March 2021 an estimated 630,241 IDPs were identified in Cabo Delgado. Sites under assessment in this report included relocation centers, temporary or transit centers, and host community extensions as classified by Camp Coordination Camp Management (CCCM) cluster. Given the active and fluid nature of displacement trends in Northern Mozambique, it is important to note that the number of sites or locations with displaced IDPs exceeds the estimated number of sites assessed for this round. The MSLA included an analysis of sector-wide needs, including shelter and non-food items (NFIs), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), food and nutrition, health, education, livelihoods, protection, community engagement and energy. This report pays special attention to the dynamics of forced displacement into sites in the province of Cabo Delgado, which has been hit the hardest by the conflict in Northern Mozambique. METHODOLOGY IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is the leading humanitarian data provider to support response planning. Information on conditions and needs of affected communities and displacement trends as well as in- depth thematic assessments are of key importance in addressing current HRP indicators and identifying priorities for the different sectoral responses. The Multi-Sectoral Location Assessment (MSLA) captures detailed information on the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in sites, including demographic information, place of origin, age and sex breakdown, vulnerabilities, and detailed sectoral needs (shelter and NFI, WASH, food, nutrition, health, education, livelihoods, communication, and protection). Information is collected through direct interviews with Key Informants (KI) and local representatives, through direct observations, and with Focus Group Discussions. Also, COVID-19 Preparedness measures in the sites were captured in this assessment. In regards to the classification of displacement sites, relocation sites are marked with the suffix “r.s.”and temporary sites with the suffix “t.s.”. Host community extensions are marked with the suffix “h.c.” and sites whose classification is unknown are marked with the suffix “u.k.”. IOM MOZAMBIQUE 2 MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 MAP OF ASSESSED SITES Centro de Reassentamento Pundanhar Olumbi EPC Namatil Palma Nangade Naschitenje Nangade M'Tamba Mocimboa Da Praia EPC Negomano Mocimboa Da Praia N'Gapa Diaca Imbuo Negomano Eduardo Modalane Mueda Mbau Mueda Muidumbe Chitunda Muidumbe Quiterajo Miteda Chapa Chai Macomia Mucojo Macomia Cabo Delgado Ibo Ibo Nairoto Quissanga Ibo Quirimba Muaguide Meluco Meluco Quirimba Quissanga Montepuez Bilibiza Mahate Ancuabe Metuge Mirate Nanjua A Metuge Centro de Nanhupo BMarokani Ntocota Nangumi Ngalane Nicuapa A MiezeCidade De Pemba Namanhumbir Mesa EPC de Nangua Mavala Metoro Cidade De Pemba Centro de Centro de Ntele Ancuabe Murrebue Montepuez Pilto Mapapulo Chiure Mecu Balama Mapupulo Meculani Chiure Velho Mecu Impiri Katapua Bairro de Impire Katapua Marrupa Chiure Velho Balama Mazeze Chiure Nametil Namuno Meloco Ocua Kuekue Namuno Ocua sede 0 345 690 1,380 km N'Cumpe Namogelia Hucula Relocation site EPC 25 de Junho Ngalane Temporary site Host community extension EPC de Manono Unknown Ntocota Number of families by site Metuge 952 - 5872 Metuge 557 - 951 Centro Agrario de Namuapala 220 - 556 Cabo Delgado 31 - 219 EPC de Nangua Province boundary Mieze District boundary Post boundary The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names, and related data shown on maps and included in this report are not warranted to be error free nor do they imply judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries by IOM. IOM MOZAMBIQUE 3 MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 OVERVIEW Metuge From 13 and 23 April 2021, in close coordination with the 11,710 provincial government of Cabo Delgado, the International families Organization for Migration (IOM)’s Displacement 22,329 Tracking Matrix (DTM) teams conducted multi-sectoral families location assessments (MSLA) in 25 sites hosting 88,704 internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Cabo Delgado Ancuabe province. In all sites, the majority of IDPs were displaced Montepuez 2,078 by the insecurity situation. The assessments were carried 6,148 families out in Cabo Delgado province, responding to the mass Others families displacements caused by the insecurity situation in the (no. families) Chiure 1,556 Namuno north. The districts hosting the largest numbers of IDPs 349 in sites were Metuge (45,022 individuals), Montepuez Mueda Balama 299 Nangade 158 (21,995), and Ancuabe (9,439). 31 The results from the assessment show that Quissanga is Figure 1: IDP households per district in Cabo Degado the district of origin for the largest number of IDPs (in sites holding 47,206 individuals), followed by Macomia (15,429), and Mocimboa da Praia (14,218). Women Men Children Of the total 88,704 individuals in the assessed sites, 27% 21% 52% 24,052 (or 27%) are women, 18,658 (21%) are men, and 45,994 (52%) are children. Figure 2: Proportion of adult female, adult male, and child IDPs In total there are 42,131 males and 46,573 females. That is <1 years 4% 4% 47% to 53%. There are a total 49,053 children (classified as under 18 years of age). As can be seen from Figure 3, there 1-5 years 11% 11% is broad alignment in population sizes when comparing males and females disaggregated by age. The only category with 6-17 years 13% 13% a noticeable difference is in adults, ages 18-59 years, with 17% of the IDPs being female adults aged 18-59, compared 18-59 years 17% 13% to 13% for males. There are no noteworthy variations in the demographic breakdown in individual sites. It should also be 60+ years 8% 7% noted that there are a total of 6,632 infant IDPs (under 1 year of age), and a further 19,373 children aged 1-5 years. Male Female The average household/family has 3.9 individuals.. Figure 3: Sex and age demographics of IDPs in Cabo Delgado Demographic data for Round 2 is summarized in the table below, with a breakdown of vulnerable groups by district. Elderly Child- Elderly- No. No. Pregnant Breastfeeding Chronic Unaccompanied District Disabilities without headed headed IDPs HH women mothers conditions Minors carers households households Ancuabe 9,439 2,078 36 8 27 5 0 93 3 3 Balama 759 158 24 26 19 37 68 12 1 1 Chiure 8,676 1,556 94 0 3 0 10 0 5 5 Metuge 45,022 11,710 610 262 120 147 7 951 6 6 Montepuez 21,995 6,148 206 1,523 3 0 11 156 4 4 Mueda 1,501 299 46 75 5 3 6 3 4 4 Namuno 1,181 349 7 52 3 14 2 0 1 1 Nangade 131 31 3 6 2 0 7 3 1 1 Grand Total 88,704 22,329 1,026 1,952 182 206 111 1,218 25 25 IOM MOZAMBIQUE 4 MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 SITE COVERAGE AND ACCESS A total of 25 sites were assessed throughout Cabo Delgado province, housing 88,704 IDPs (22,329 households). Also, 28 per cent of the total camp/site IDP population resides in a single site (EPC 25 de Junho t.s.). Calculations and figures in this report are presented as a site-based analysis, though also weighted by site population when relevant. Of the 25 sites, 11 are relocation centres, 9 are temporary sites, 1 is a host community extension, and 4 sites are unspecified. When relevant trends based on site classification are noticed, they are mentioned in the analyses. As per CCCM classification, relocation sites are planned by local authorities and sometimes with CCCM partners with certain minimum criteria for households (e.g. minimum space per family). Temporary sites are locations with pre-existing infrastructure, like schools, that have been repurposed in this period of crisis. All sites are reported as open, and 96 per cent are physically accessible (only Chiure Velho u.k. was not accessible due a damaged bridge). Of the 24 sites that are accessible, 19 (or 79%) risk becoming inaccessible in the event of a natural disaster. All sites are reported as safe and secure for access by humanitarian partners. IDP MOBILITY 16% Of the 25 sites assessed in Cabo Delgado province, it is reported that the main cause of displacement for IDPs in 24 sites was to flee the insecurity situation. In one site, EPC Namatil t.s. in Mueda, reported that 12% an epidemic was the cause of their displacement. In 64 per cent of sites, the majority of the IDP population arrived more than six months ago, 15 per cent between three and six months ago, and 15 per cent between 64% 8% one and three months ago.