DOCSLIB.ORG

Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mozambique Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey 2008 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTATÍSTICAS FINAL REPORT OF THE MULTIPLE INDICATOR CLUSTER SURVEY, 2008 © 2009 National Statistics Institute PRESIDENCY Authors João Dias Loureiro Stélio Napica de Araujo, Abdulai Dade, President Maria de Fátima Zacarias, Cassiano Soda Chipembe, Xadreque Hermínio Maunze, Manuel da Costa Gaspar Carlos Creva Singano Deputy President Valeriano da Conceição Levene Deputy President Quality Analysis João Dias Loureiro, Manuel da Costa Gaspar, Maria de Fátima Zacarias, Cassiano Soda Chipembe Title Management Final Report of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Maria de Fátima Zacarias Survey, 2008. Data Processing Editor Nordino Titus Machava National Statistics Institute Directorate of Demographic, Life and Social Pierre Martel Statistics Av. Fernão de Magalhães, n° 34, 2º Andar Coordination and Supervision of Field Caixa Postal 493 Maputo Work: Telephones: + 258-21-327925/6 Arão Balate, Cristóvão Muahio Fax: + 258-21-327927 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.ine.gov.mz Sample Implementation Carlos Creva Singano, David Megill Technical and Financial Assistance UNICEF Distribution Distribution Department, INE's Directorate for Coordination, Integration and Foreign Relations Table of Results Indicators of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), Mozambique, 2008 Topic MICS Indicator Number MDG Indicator Number Indicator Value CHILD MORTALITY 1 4.1 Under-five mortality rate (< 5 years) 141 per thousand 2 4.2 Infant mortality rate (<= 1 year) 95 per thousand NUTRITION 6 1.8 Underweight prevalence 18 per cent Nutritional Status 7 Stunting prevalence 44 per cent 8 Wasting prevalence 4 per cent 45 Timely initiation of breastfeeding (first hour) 63 per cent 15 Exclusive breastfeeding rate 0–5 months 37 per cent 16 Continued breastfeeding rate at 12–15 months 91 per cent Breastfeeding at 20–23 months 54 per cent 17 Timely complementary feeding rate 84 per cent 18 Frequency of complementary feeding 51 per cent 19 Adequately fed infants (0–11 months) 44 per cent 41 Iodized salt consumption (> 15 ppm) 25 per cent Salt iodization Iodized salt consumption 58 per cent 42 Vitamin A supplementation (children under five) 72 per cent Vitamin A 43 Vitamin A supplementation (mothers in first two months 66 per cent after birth) 9 Low birthweight infants 16 per cent Low birthweight 10 Infants weighed at birth 58 per cent CHILD HEALTH 25 Immunization coverage (BCG) 84 per cent 26 Immunization coverage (polio 3) 70 per cent Immunization 27 Immunization coverage (DPT3) 70 per cent 28 4.3 Immunization coverage (measles) 64 per cent 31 Full immunization coverage 48 per cent Tetanus toxoid 32 Neonatal tetanus protection 79 per cent 33 Use of oral rehydration therapy (ORT) 54 per cent 34 Home management of diarrhoea 19 per cent Care of illness 35 Use of ORT, or increased fluids, and continued feeding 47 per cent 23 Care-seeking for suspected pneumonia 65 per cent 22 Antibiotic treatment of suspected pneumonia 22 per cent Solid fossil fuel use 24 Solid fossil fuels 97 per cent 36 Household availability of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) 55 per cent 37 6.7 Children under five sleeping under ITNs 23 per cent Malaria 38 Children under five sleeping under untreated nets 42 per cent 39 6.8 Antimalarial treatment (children under five) 23 per cent 40 Intermittent preventive malaria treatment (pregnant women) 67 per cent ENVIRONMENT 11 7.8 Use of improved drinking water sources 43 per cent 13 Water treatment 10 percent Water and sanitation 12 7.9 Use of improved sanitation facilities 19 per cent 14 Safe disposal of children’s faeces 32 per cent iii Topic MICS Indicator Number MDG Indicator Number Indicator Value REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 20 5.5 Women receiving antenatal care 92 per cent 44 Content of antenatal care Maternal and newborn Blood test taken 62 per cent health Blood pressure measured 62 per cent Urine specimen taken 37 per cent Weight measured 87 per cent 4 5.2 Skilled attendant at delivery 55 per cent 5 Institutional deliveries 58 per cent CHILD DEVELOPMENT 46 Support for learning 31 per cent 47 Father’s support for learning 16 per cent Child development 48 Support for learning: children’s books 3 per cent 49 Support for learning: non-children’s books 52 per cent 51 Children under inadequate care 33 per cent EDUCATION 54 Timely entry into primary school 65 per cent 55 2.1 Net attendance rate (primary school) 81 per cent 56 Net attendance rate (secondary school) 20 per cent 57 2.2 Children entering primary school who reach 5th grade 77 per cent Education 58 Rate of transition to secondary school 73 per cent 59 Rate of timely completion of primary school 15 per cent 61 3.1 Gender parity index Primary school 0.97 (ratio) Secondary school 0.98 (ratio) Literacy 60 2.3 Literacy rate of women aged 15–24 47 per cent CHILD PROTECTION Birth registration 62 Birth registration 31 per cent 71 Child labour 22 per cent Child labour 72 Working students 25 per cent 73 Student workers 78 per cent 67 Women married before the age of 15 18 per cent Women married before the age of 18 52 per cent 68 Young women (15–19) currently married/in unions 40 per cent Early marriage and 70 Polygyny 24 per cent polygamy 69 Percentage of women aged 15–19 and 20–24 currently married/in union with a spouse at least 10 years older Women aged 15–19 Women aged 20–24 22 per cent 21 per cent Domestic violence 100 Percentage of women aged 15–49 who believe that 36 per cent violence by the husband is justifiable Disability 101 Children with disabilities 14 per cent iv Topic MICS Indicator Number MDG Indicator Number Indicator Value HIV and AIDS, SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR, AND ORPHANED AND VULNERABLE CHILDREN 82 6.3 Knowledge of HIV and AIDs prevention among young 12 per cent people 89 1. Knowledge of mother-to-child transmission of HIV 55 per cent 86 2. Positive attitude towards people with HIV and AIDS 23 per cent HIV and AIDS knowledge 87 Women who know where to be tested for HIV infection 77 per cent and attitudes among women 88 3. Women who have been tested for HIV infection 30 per cent 90 Counselling coverage for preventing mother-to-child 59 per cent transmission of HIV 91 Testing coverage for preventing mother-to-child 43 per cent transmission of HIV 84 First sexual relation at an early age 29 per cent 92 Great difference in age between sexual partners 16 per cent Women’s sexual behaviour 83 6.2 Condom use with non-regular partners 44 per cent 85 High-risk sex in the past year 32 per cent 75 Prevalence of orphans 12 per cent 78 Children not living with their biological parents 15 per cent 76 Prevalence of vulnerable children 6 per cent 77 6.4 School attendance ratio between orphans and non-orphans 0.89 Support to orphaned and 81 Support to children orphaned or made vulnerable because 22 per cent vulnerable children of AIDS 79 Undernutrition among children orphaned or made 1.1 (ratio) vulnerable because of AIDS 80 Early sexual relations among girls orphaned or made 0.91 (ratio) vulnerable because of AIDS v Contents Table of results ..................................................................................................................... iii List of tables ......................................................................................................................... ix List of graphs ........................................................................................................................ xi List of abbreviations.............................................................................................................. xiii Preface ................................................................................................................................. xv Executive summary .............................................................................................................. xvii I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 3 Design and size of the sample ............................................................................................. 3 Survey questionnaires .......................................................................................................... 3 Training the survey staff ....................................................................................................... 4 Organization of fieldwork ...................................................................................................... 5 Data processing.................................................................................................................... 5 III. Sample coverage and characteristics of households and respondents.................. 6 Sample coverage.................................................................................................................. 6 IV. Child mortality ............................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 8 Mortality levels and trends .................................................................................................... 8 Mortality differentials ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Landscape Approach to Elephant Conservation in Mozambique

    A Landscape Approach to Elephant Conservation in Mozambique

    A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique by Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria February 2012 i © University of Pretoria A landscape approach to elephant conservation in Mozambique Student: Cornélio Pedro Ntumi Supervisor: Professor Rudi J. van Aarde Conservation Ecology Research Unit Department of Zoology & Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria 0002 rjvaardezoology.up.ac.za Co-supervisor: Dr Sam M. Ferreira Scientific Services South African National Parks Skukuza 1350 South Africa Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) ii Abstract People and elephants share landscapes throughout Mozambique. Here elephant conservation management focuses on protected areas but fails to address the conflict that exists between elephants and people. In this thesis I develop a landscape approach to conflict mitigation that is designed to accommodate the needs of people and of elephants in human-dominated landscapes. Mozambique faces a dilemma: politically it is required to reduce poverty while at the same time adhere to international agreements and requirements to protect biodiversity with relatively scarce financial resources. Reactive mitigation of human-elephant conflict (HEC) at the site-specific scale have proven to be costly and with low efficacy. A shift from reactive to proactive HEC mitigation approaches at the county-wide scale (e.g. a district level, the administrative planning body) may provide opportunities to reconcile such apparent contrasting requirements in Mozambique. The elephant population of Mozambique is fragmented and remnant sub-populations are limited to clusters of protected areas in a matrix of human-dominated landscapes.
  • Situational Analysis on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Tete Province, Mozambique

    Situational Analysis on Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Tete Province, Mozambique

    República de Moçambique Governo Provincial de Tete Direção Provincial de Saúde Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Tete, February 2015 Situational analysis on health equity and social determinants of health, Tete Province, Mozambique Rene Loewenson and Sarah Simpson Training and Research Support Centre In co-operation with DPS Tete and Embassy of Denmark Mozambique, February 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Contexts for and trends in social determinants of health equity ............................................ 5 3.1 Tete province and its population ............................................................................................ 5 3.2 Health status distribution and trends ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Environmental assets and challenges for health ................................................................... 9 3.4 The economic context: high growth, high poverty, high inequality ...................................... 11 3.5 Expanding transport, energy, communications infrastructure ............................................
  • Manica Province

    Manica Province

    Back to National Overview OVERVIEW FOR MANICA PROVINCE Tanzania Zaire Comoros Malawi Cabo Del g ad o Niassa Zambia Nampul a Tet e Manica Zambezi a Manica Zimbabwe So f al a Madagascar Botswana Gaza Inhambane South Africa Maput o N Swaziland 200 0 200 400 Kilometers Overview for Manica Province 2 The term “village” as used herein has the same meaning as “the term “community” used elsewhere. Schematic of process. MANICA PROVINCE 678 Total Villages C P EXPERT OPINION o m l COLLECTION a n p n o i n n e g TARGET SAMPLE n t 136 Villages VISITED INACCESSIBLE 121 Villages 21 Villages LANDMINE- UNAFFECTED BY AFFECTED NO INTERVIEW LANDMINES 60 Villages 3 Villages 58 Villages 110 Suspected Mined Areas DATA ENTERED INTO D a IMSMA DATABASE t a E C n o t r m y p a MINE IMPACT SCORE (SAC/UNMAS) o n n d e A n t n a HIGH IMPACT MODERATE LOW IMPACT l y 2 Villages IMPACT 45 Villages s i s 13 Villages FIGURE 1. The Mozambique Landmine Impact Survey (MLIS) visited 9 of 10 Districts in Manica. Cidade de Chimoio was not visited, as it is considered by Mozambican authorities not to be landmine-affected. Of the 121 villages visited, 60 identified themselves as landmine-affected, reporting 110 Suspected Mined Areas (SMAs). Twenty-one villages were inaccessible, and three villages could not be found or were unknown to local people. Figure 1 provides an overview of the survey process: village selection; data collection; and data-entry into the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) database, out of which is generated the Mine Impact Score (Appendix I).
  • International Development Association

    International Development Association

    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: PAD2873 Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 58.6 MILLION (US$82.0 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized FROM THE MOZAMBIQUE ENERGY FOR ALL MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$66 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE FOR THE MOZAMBIQUE ENERGY FOR ALL (ProEnergia) PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized March 7, 2019 Energy and Extractives Global Practice Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 31, 2019) Currency Unit = Mo zambique Metical (MZN) MZN 62.15 = US$1 SDR 0.71392875 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Hafez M. H. Ghanem Country Director: Mark R. Lundell Senior Global Practice Director: Riccardo Puliti Practice Manager: Sudeshna Ghosh Banerjee Task Team Leaders: Zayra Luz Gabriela Romo Mercado, Mariano Salto ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AECF Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan ARENE Energy Regulatory Authority (Autoridade Reguladora de Energia) BCI Commercial and Investments Bank (Banco Comercial e de Investimentos) BRILHO Energy Africa CAPEX Capital Expenditure CMS Commercial Management System CPF Country Partnership Framework CTM Maputo Thermal Power
  • 9065C70cfd3177958525777b

    9065C70cfd3177958525777b

    The FY 1989 Annual Report of the Agency for international DevelaprnentiOHiee of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance was researched. written, and produced by Cynthia Davis, Franca Brilliant, Mario Carnilien, Faye Henderson, Waveriy Jackson, Dennis J. King, Wesley Mossburg, Joseph OYConnor.Kimberly S.C. Vasconez. and Beverly Youmans of tabai Anderson Incorparated. Arlingtot?. Virginia, under contract ntrmber QDC-0800-C-00-8753-00, Office 0%US Agency ior Foreign Disaster Enternatiorr~ai Assistance Development Message from the Director ............................................................................................................................. 6 Summary of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance .............................................................................................. 8 Retrospective Look at OFDA's 25 Years of Operations ................................................................................. 10 OFDA Emergency Response ......................................................................................................................... 15 Prior-Year (FY 1987 and 1988) and Non-Declared Disasters FV 1989 DISASTERS LUROPE Ethiopia Epidemic ................................. ............. 83 Soviet Union Accident ......................................... 20 Gabon Floods .................................... ... .................84 Soviet Union Earthquake .......................................24 Ghana Floods ....................................................... 85 Guinea Bissau Fire .............................................
  • MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021

    MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021

    MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT ROUND 2 Mozambique - Cabo Delgado April 2021 22,329 IDP 25 assessed sites 88,704 IDPs households Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Naschitenje temporary site, Naschitenje locality in Mueda district DTM activities are supported by: MOZAMBIQUE: CABO DELGADO MULTI-SECTORAL LOCATION ASSESSMENT - ROUND 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Multi-Sectorial Location Assessment (MSLA) report, which presents findings from the International Organization for Migration’s (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Round 2 assessments, aims to enhance understanding of the extent of internal displacements and the needs of affected populations in conflict-affected districts of Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province. The report covers the period from 13 to April 23 2021 and presents trends from 25 assessed sites hosting internally displaced persons across eight districts in Cabo Delgado. In total, 88,704 internally displaced persons (IDPs) or 22,329 households were mapped living in sites assessed during this MSLA. Reported figures, however, exclude displaced individuals living in host community settings. According to DTM Round 11 Baseline, as of March 2021 an estimated 630,241 IDPs were identified in Cabo Delgado. Sites under assessment in this report included relocation centers, temporary or transit centers, and host community extensions as classified by Camp Coordination Camp Management (CCCM) cluster. Given the active and fluid nature of displacement trends in Northern Mozambique, it is important to note that the number of sites or locations with displaced IDPs exceeds the estimated number of sites assessed for this round. The MSLA included an analysis of sector-wide needs, including shelter and non-food items (NFIs), water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), food and nutrition, health, education, livelihoods, protection, community engagement and energy.
  • Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP)

    Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP)

    FY 2015 Mozambique Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for Mozambique. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. 3) Sustainability Index and Dashboard Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” MOZAMBIQUE 2015 Country Operational Plan Strategic Direction Summary 1 | P a g e Definition of Acronyms ACT Accelerating Children's Treatment Initiative ART Antiretroviral Therapy ARV Antiretroviral drugs CCM Country Coordinating Mechanism COP Country Operational Plan CSW Commercial Sex Workers DREAMS Determined, Resilient, AIDS-free, Mentored,
  • Bds Needs Assessment in Nacala and Beira Corridor

    Bds Needs Assessment in Nacala and Beira Corridor

    USAID AgriFUTURO Mozambique Agribusiness and Trade Competitiveness Program Business Development Services Needs Assessment FINAL REPORT June 2010 By: Carlos Fumo (Senior Expert) TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. Note of Thanks .............................................................................................. 3 1. Acronyms and abbreviations.......................................................................... 4 2. General introduction ...................................................................................... 6 2.1. Background and introduction ................................................................. 6 3. Overall objectives of the Assessment ............................................................ 7 4. Deliverables ................................................................................................... 8 5. Methodology .................................................................................................. 8 5.1. Secondary Research .................................................................................. 9 5.2. Primary Research ................................................................................... 9 5.3. Data analysis and report writing ........................................................... 11 5.4. Sampling ............................................................................................... 11 6. The needs assessment process .................................................................. 13 7. The limitations of the study .........................................................................
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000644 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA-33660 IDA-3366A MULT-23844) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 4.2 MILLION (US$ 5.6 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 4.1 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized FOR A COASTAL AND MARINE BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PROJECT DECEMBER 2007 AFTEN: Environment and Natural Resources AFTS2: Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective December 12, 2007) Currency Unit = Meticais 24.47 MZN = US$ 1 US$ 1.58 = SRD FISCAL YEAR [January 1 – December 31] ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS Country Assistance Strategy CDS Sustainable Development Center CMBMP Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Management Project CPI Investment Promotion Center CPS Country Partnership Strategy DANIDA Danish International Development Agency DCA Development Credit Agreement DGA Development Grant Agreement DINATUR National Directorate of Tourism DNFFB National Directorate of Forestry and Wildlife DO Development Objective EMCBP2 Environmental Management Capacity Building Project 2 GEF Global Environment Facility GoM Government of Mozambique ICM Integrated Coastal Management ICR Implementation Completion and Results IDA International Development Association IDP Integrated Development Plan INIA Agriculture Research Institution MACEMP Marine and Coastal Environment Management
  • Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique

    Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique

    Report | no. 360 Report | no. Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Since 2006, the UNICEF–Netherlands Partnership evaluation office. It found evidence of a large Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation has increase in the use of improved water sources been supporting Water Supply and Sanitation and in the ownership and use of latrines. Much of programmes in Mozambique. The largest the increase can be attributed to an innovative programme, the ‘One Million Initiative’ aims to approach to sanitation. However, water from bring improved sanitation and clean water to improved sources and even more importantly, over one million people in rural Mozambique. stored water, are not always safe to drink. An Half-way through the programme, a joint impact element of subsidy will continue to be needed to evaluation was carried out by IOB and UNICEF’s sustain facilities and services. More than Water Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) P.O. box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl/iob © Ministry of Foreign Affairs | October 2011| ISBN 978-90-5328-414-8 11Buz283729 | E This project was a product of a cooperation between: Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique More than Water Mid-term impact evaluation: UNICEF – Government of The Netherlands Partnership for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene ‘One Million Initiative’, Mozambique Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Preface Drinking water supply and basic sanitation has been a priority for the Netherlands’ development co-operation and for UNICEF for many years.
  • Planning African Rural Towns the Case of Caia and Sena, Mozambique

    Planning African Rural Towns the Case of Caia and Sena, Mozambique

    Monographs of the School of Doctoral Studies in Environmental Engineering Doctoral School in Environmental Engineering Planning African rural towns The case of Caia and Sena, Mozambique Roberta Nicchia 2011 Monographs of the School of Doctoral Studies in Environmental Engineering Doctoral School in Environmental Engineering Planning African rural towns The case of Caia and Sena, Mozambique Roberta Nicchia 2011 i Doctoral thesis in Environmental Engineering, XXIII cycle Faculty of Engineering, University of Trento Academic year 2009/2010 Supervisor: prof. Corrado Diamantini, University of Trento University of Trento Trento, Italy 2011 ii ―Só a Antropofagia nos une. Socialmente. Economicamente. Filosoficamente. Única lei do mundo. Expressão mascarada de todos os individualismos, de todos os coletivismos. De todas as religiões. De todos os tratados de paz. [...] Só me interessa o que não é meu. Lei do homem. Lei do antropófago [...] A alegria é a prova dos nove. A luta entre o que se chamaria Incriado e a Criatura – ilustrada pela contradição permanente do homem e o seu Tabu. O amor cotidiano e o modusvivendi capitalista. Antropofagia. Absorção do inimigo sacro. Para transformá-lo em totem. A humana aventura. A terrena finalidade.‖ Oswald de Andrade, Manifesto antropófago, 1928 iii iv Preface The present study is part of a wider research and spatial planning activity conducted over the last seven years by the DICA—Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (University of Trento) in the district of Caia, Mozambique. The DICA, in fact, is involved in a decentralized cooperation program, named ―Il Trentino in Mozambico e il Mozambico in Trentino‖, between the Provinces of Trento (Italy) and Sofala (Mozambique).
  • PPP ECD Programming

    PPP ECD Programming

    PPP ECD programming CA AID-656-A-16-00002 (GDA ECD Programming) Fiscal Year 2018 Year 3: April 2018–March 2019 Quarterly Report: Q2 July–September 2018 Submitted on: October 30, 2018 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement No. AID-656-A-16-00002 Submitted by: PATH Street address: 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121, USA Mailing address: PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA Tel: 206.285.3500; Fax: 206.285.6619 www.path.org This work is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of PATH and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 1 Contents Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................2 1. Overview of the reporting period .................................................................................... 3 2. Project objectives ........................................................................................................... 4 3. Results framework/Logical framework ............................................................................ 5 4. Indicators ....................................................................................................................... 6 Indicator 1 .....................................................................................................................................6