DOCSLIB.ORG

Intrepid and the Vietnam War Y Using the Map of the Exhibition on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intrepid and the Vietnam War Y Using the Map of the Exhibition on The Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions Challenge: Using the map of the exhibition on the right, 7b 7c find the objects listed below. 5b 8a Use your observations and 6a 7a the labels to answer the 5a 9a 8d 8b 8c questions in the spaces provided. 10a 10b 3a 3c 3b 2c 2b 2a 4a 1a 1. Introduction 6. Dangerous Skies 1a. Introduction Wall 6a. Anti-Aircraft Gun 2. Cold War Fears 7. Missing in Action and Prisoners of War 2a. Ho Chi Minh Poster 7a. Blood Chit 2b. Map of Vietnam 7b. Photograph of U.S Prisoners of War 2c. Domino Theory Cartoon 7c. POW Uniform 3. Facts and Fictions 8. The Unpopular War 3a. Facts and Fictions Panel 8a. Photographs of Protest 3b. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution 8b. Countermovement poster, 1967 3c. Picture of Bullet Hole on Maddox 8c. Photograph of Flag-Covered Caskets 8d. GI Newspaper, 1972 4. Operation Rolling Thunder 4a. Operation Rolling Thunder Panel 9. The Intrepid Four 9a. Newspaper, 1968 5. 3,000 Men 5a. U.S. Navy Recruitment Poster 10. Coming Home 5b. Vietnam Booklet 10a. Photographs of Helicopter and Refugees 10b. Photographs of Intrepid Returning Home ŀ Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions 1. Introduction 1a. Introduction Wall From what or whose perspective is this exhibition told? How do you think this perspective may differ from troops fighting on the ground? 2. Cold War Fears 2a. Ho Chi Minh Poster Read the caption. What were Ho Chi Minh’s goals for Vietnam? 2b. Map of Vietnam Look at the map and read the “Cold War Fears” panel to your left. Prior to the war, North Vietnam, which was led by Ho Chi Minh, strove for an independent, unified and Communist Vietnam. Why do you think the United States would want to prevent Ho Chi Minh from reaching South Vietnam? 2c. Domino Theory Cartoon What is represented in this cartoon? According to this cartoon, what fears did the government of the United States have? 3. Facts and Fictions 3a. Fact and Fictions Panel What occurred on August 2, 1964? What happened two days later? 3b. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution What did the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution allow the president to do? 3c. Picture of Bullet Hole on Maddox What is shown in this photograph? How severe does this damage appear? Read the last paragraph on the “Facts and Fictions” panel. What did the NSA confirm? What do you think was the motivation for releasing only some of the facts to the public at the time? 4. Operation Rolling Thunder 4a. Operation Rolling Thunder Panel What were the goals of Operation Rolling Thunder at the start? How did they change? 5. 3,000 Men 5a. U.S. Navy Recruitment Poster The majority of Intrepid ’s crew members during the Vietnam War were volunteers. Why do you think a poster like this might make someone want to volunteer? 5b. Vietnam Booklet After looking at the information in this booklet, how do you think Americans viewed the Vietnamese people at this time? What are some ideas they might have had about them? 6. Dangerous Skies 6a. Anti-Aircraft Gun Intrepid started service in Vietnam at Dixie Station near South Vietnam and later moved to Yankee Station near North Vietnam. North Vietnamese soldiers had access to technology like this ZPU anti-aircraft gun. How do you think this technology affected the pilots flying missions from Intrepid ? 7. Missing in Action and Prisoners of War 7a. Blood Chit Why did this object have requests for food, shelter and protection in so many languages? What situation do you think these servicemen were preparing for? 7b. Photograph of U.S. Prisoners of War This photograph was taken during a visit by international observers and Western journalists. Why do you think observers and journalists were allowed in the prison camp? 7c. POW Uniform What can you infer about Lt. Wilson Key’s prison camp experience from his uniform and tin ware? If you have time, listen to his oral history. 8. The Unpopular War 8a. Photographs of Protest Compare these photographs of antiwar protesters. What can you tell about their reasons for wanting to end U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War? 8b. Countermovement Poster, 1967 Find the one countermovement poster. What message is this poster trying to convey to Americans? 8c. Photograph of Flag-Covered Caskets The war in Vietnam was the first televised war. How do you think images and video from the war affected public opinion back in the United States? 8d. GI Newspaper, 1972 How do you think newspapers like these affected morale among active servicemen during the war? 9. The Intrepid Four 9a. Newspaper, 1968 How do you think the public would have reacted to hearing about the Intrepid Four? Why? 10. Coming Home 10a. Photograph of Helicopter and Refugees Do you believe the United States was responsible for the South Vietnamese people left in Saigon after the withdrawal of U.S. troops? Why or why not? 10b. Photographs of Intrepid Returning Home Intrepid returned to Norfolk, Virginia, in 1969. The Vietnam War lasted until 1975. According to what you already knew about the experience of U.S. troops returning from Vietnam, how did the return for Intrepid pictured here differ from the return home for other servicemen? Essay Prompts Using the information you learned from your tour of the exhibition and your knowledge of the Vietnam War, answer one of the essay prompts on a separate piece of paper. Informative: a. How do you think the experience of Intrepid crew members differed from the experience of non-Navy servicemen during the Vietnam War? b. How was the Vietnam War different from earlier wars in which the United States took part? Argumentative: c. Should the United States have been involved in the Vietnam War? Why or why not? d. Should a government ever hide information from its people? Why or why not? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airpower in Three Wars
    AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom).
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the USNA Class of 1963 Who Served in the Vietnam War
    Members of the USNA Class of 1963 Who Served in the Vietnam War. Compiled by Stephen Coester '63 Supplement to the List of Over Three Hundred Classmates Who Served in Vietnam 1 Phil Adams I was on the USS Boston, Guided Missile Cruiser patrolling the Vietnam Coast in '67, and we got hit above the water line in the bow by a sidewinder missile by our own Air Force. ------------------- Ross Anderson [From Ross’s Deceased Data, USNA63.org]: Upon graduation from the Academy on 5 June 1963, Ross reported for flight training at Pensacola Naval Air Station (NAS) which he completed at the top of his flight class (and often "Student of the Month") in 1964. He then left for his first Southeast Asia Cruise to begin conducting combat missions in Vietnam. Landing on his newly assigned carrier USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) at midnight, by 5 am that morning he was off on his first combat mission. That squadron, VF-154 (the Black Knights) had already lost half of its cadre of pilots. Ross' flying buddy Don Camp describes how Ross would seek out flying opportunities: Upon our return on Oct 31, 1965 to NAS Miramar, the squadron transitioned from the F-8D (Crusader) to the F4B (Phantom II). We left on a second combat cruise and returned about Jan 1967. In March or April of 1967, Ross got himself assigned TAD [temporary additional duty] to NAS North Island as a maintenance test pilot. I found out and jumped on that deal. We flew most all versions of the F8 and the F4 as they came out of overhaul.
    [Show full text]
  • PIAMA 26 a Historical Appreciation of Naval Air Power
    Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 26 Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 26 A Historical Appreciation of the Contribution of Naval Air Power A Historical Appreciation Of The Contribution Naval Air Power A Historical Appreciation Andrew T Ross and James M Sandison with an introduction by Jack McCaffrie A.T. Ross and J.M. Sandison A.T. SEA POWER CENTRE - AUSTRALIA A HISTORICAL APPRECIATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF NAVAL AIR POWER © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, and with standard source credit included, no part may be reproduced without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to the Director, Sea Power Centre - Australia, Department of Defence, CANBERRA ACT 2600. National Library of Australian Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Ross, A.T. 1948- Sandison, J.M. 1932- McCaffrie, J. 1948- A historical appreciation of the contribution of naval air power ISSN 1327-5658 ISBN 978-0-642-2965-5 A HISTORICAL APPRECIATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF NAVAL AIR POWER by Andrew T. Ross and James M. Sandison with an introduction by Jack McCaffrie iv Disclaimer The views expressed are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Government of Australia, the Department of Defence and the Royal Australian Navy. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this publication. Sea Power Centre – Australia The Sea Power Centre – Australia (SPC-A), was established to undertake activities to promote the study, discussion and awareness of maritime issues and strategy within the RAN and the Defence and civil communities at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Ti,I;If I'fff , I I I: I !;;Io,R
    rn68"01-86 ti,i;if i'fff , i I i: i !;;Io,r I lPPR0vt0 F0[ , THE AIR FORCE IN SOUTTIEAST ASIA PUBL IC REI.IASE Shield for Vietnamization I and Withdrawal 19 71 by E. Hartsook OFFICE OF AIR FORCE HISTORY Washington, DC July 1976 FOREWORD This monograph is the fifteenth in a series of historical studies covering USAF plans, policies, and operations in Southeast Asia, published under the general title, The Air Force in Southeast Asia. Its focus is the role of the Air Force in'support of American De- cisions to withdraw U. S. combat troops and to turn the conduct of the war over to the South Vietnamese. Massive USAF efforts were devoted to attacking and destroying enemy stockpiles and troop concentrations in Cambodia and Laos, to supporting South Vietna- mese ground attacks in the Laotian panhandle, to attempting to Vietnamize the interdiction function, and, finally, to countering the enemy air buildup in late 1971. Complicating these endeavors was the requirement to withdraw certain American air units as part of the overall drawdown from Southeast Asia. In describing these actions, the author reviews key national pol- icies and other developments that affected operations. These pro- vide a background for understanding the dramatic events of 1971 in which the USAF was so much involved. It is an exciting and signi- ficant aspect of Air Force history. STANLEY L. FALK Chief Historian Office of Air Force Historv ttl UNCLASSIFIED PREFACE (U) The story of U. S. air power in Southeast Asia in l9?1 is the story of the Administrationts continuing, &rid at times intensified, use of it to thwart enemy initiatives everywhere in Indochina and insure the success of U.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Student Questions
    Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions Challenge: Using the map of the exhibition on the right, find the objects listed below. Use your observations and the labels to answer the questions in the spaces provided. 7b 5a 7a 4a 8a 6a 9a 8b 10a 3b 2b 3a 10b 2a 1a 1. Introduction 6. Dangerous Skies 1a. Introduction Wall 6a. Survival, Escape and Evasion Kit 2. Cold War Fears 7. Missing in Action and Prisoners of War 2a. Map of Vietnam 7a. Photograph of U.S. Prisoners of War 2b. Domino Theory Cartoon 7b. POW: Lt. Wilson Denver “Denny” Key Screen 3. Facts and Fictions 8. The Unpopular War 3a. Gulf of Tonkin Wall 8a. Photographs of Protest 3b. Gulf of Tonkin Screen 8b. Photograph of Flag-Covered Caskets 4. The Air War 9. The Intrepid Four 4a. The Air War Panel 9a. Newspaper, 1968 5. 3,000 Men 10. Coming Home 5a. U.S. Navy Recruitment Poster 10a. Photographs of Helicopter and Refugees 10b. Photographs of Intrepid Returning Home Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions 1. Introduction 1a. Introduction Wall From what or whose perspective is this exhibition told? How do you think this perspective may differ from troops fighting on the ground? 2. Cold War Fears 2a. Map of Vietnam Look at the map and read the first paragraph of the “Gulf of Tonkin” panel to your left. Before the war, North Vietnam, which was led by Ho Chi Minh, strove for an independent, unified and Communist Vietnam. Why do you think the United States would have wanted to prevent the North Vietnamese from reaching South Vietnam? 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of Defeat: the Impact of Aerial Rules of Engagement
    THE RULES OF DEFEAT: THE IMPACT OF AERIAL RULES OF ENGAGEMENT ON USAF OPERATIONS IN NORTH VIETNAM, 1965-1968 Major Ricky James Drake Phenix City, Alabama A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The School of Advanced Airpower Studies For Completion of Graduation Requirements School of Advanced Airpower Studies Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama May 1992 Disclaimer The views in this paper are entirely those of the author expressed under Air University principles of academic freedom and do not reflect official views of the school of Advanced Airpower Studies, Air University, the U.s. Air Force, or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Regulation 110-8, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION. 1 2. BACKGRIDUND INFORMATION. 3 3. IMPACT OF ROEs ON MILITARY COMMANDERS AND AIRCREWS. 12 4. ROLLINIG THUNDER --MISSION EFFECTIVENESS. 20 5. IMPACT OF ROEs ON THE ENEMY. 27 6. CONCLUSIONS. 32 ABSTRACT During the Vietnam War, many American air commanders were convinced that rigid Rules of Engagement (ROEs) prevented an American aerial victory over North Vietnam during the Rolling Thunder air campaign from 1965-1968. ROEs were directives issued by civilian authority to guide the conduct of all US aerial operations in Southeast Asia. To the men "in the field" these rules provided detailed guidance to be followed by all commanders, air planners, control personnel, and combat crew members in the actual planning and flying of combat missions. ROEs allowed President Lyndon Johnson to apply measured amounts of air power both to avoid escalation of the war into World War III and to preserve domestic social programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Help Guide
    TEACHER HELP GUIDE LESSON PLAN: The Nuclear Umbrella – Still Here After the Cold War DEVELOPED BY: John Clark, science teacher and military historian, Deltona High School, Deltona, FL 2012 Naval Historical Foundation STEM-H Teacher Fellowship INSTRUCTIONAL GOAL: (history) The Cold War period is required study under the educational standards of many states. This lesson offers an original way to cover that period in American history and potentially raise student achievement through its uniqueness. BACKGROUND: The Cold War is officially over but the threat from the evolution of nuclear weapons that created that war remains and is growing. Students need to understand that an attack on the United States by a nuclear weapon is still a very real possibility. Make the Cold War come alive for your students by using the resources and web site of the Cold War Gallery at the Naval Museum in Washington, D.C. to educate today’s students about the realities of living under a nuclear umbrella. Focusing on the role of the Navy during this long and tense 45 year period is a great way to build student interest in learning about an important chapter in recent American history. Students will gain a perspective of how living under the nuclear umbrella has evolved to present day. Our future citizens need to internalize the continuing dangers and the threat to American life evolving from the spread of nuclear weapons around the globe. If you cannot come to the museum you can use its resources by taking your students on a virtual tour of the gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • The In-Country War by John T
    In South Vietnam, airpower was subor- dinated to a ground strategy—and the ground strategy didn’t work. A F-100 Supersabre sends a 750-pound bomb hurtling toward its target in Vietnam. The In-Country War by John T. Correll he prevailing military wis- US involvement began as advice Vietnam, directed by political decisions, dom going into the 1960s was and training for the South Vietnamese was essentially that of a war of attrition,” that the United States should armed forces but the mission expanded. said Army Gen. William C. Westmore- Tnot get bogged down in a ground war in In mid-1965, the United States plunged land, commander of Military Assistance Asia. This admonition was well known into what it had so often been warned Command Vietnam, MACV. to policy-makers in the White House and against—a land war in Asia. By the end The assumption was that “search the Pentagon as they struggled with the of 1965, there were 155,000 US troops and destroy” operations could win the impending problem of Vietnam. on the ground in South Vietnam, with war in the South by inflicting more In late April of 1961, the new Presi- more on the way. casualties than the enemy was prepared dent, John F. Kennedy, was cautioned By decree from Washington, the to withstand. Westmoreland—who de- again by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, who “In-Country” War in South Vietnam vised the attrition strategy—dismissed had fought two wars in the Pacific and took precedence over all other efforts any concern about “Asia’s legendary Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • Yankee Station/Operation Market Time: My Story
    Yankee Station/Operation Market Time: My Story By AWCS Terry B. Burkett, USN Retired Author’s Note: In writing this story, I have reached back over 46-years in an attempt to recall dates, places, names, and events. In doing so, it has not been without error. These are my recollections and mine alone. Any error or omission is simply due to this old Senior Chief’s sometimes feeble mind. In the 22+ years of Naval Service I logged over 6000 flight hours in the P-3 aircraft. I have flown and worked with the finest naval officers, Naval Aircrewman, and maintenance and support personnel. A few are worth noting here: To LCDR Hite my first PPC in VP-9 circa 1965-66 who once chewed my ass out severely and I never forgot the lesson. To AX2 Mac McCarty my 1st Tech in VP-9 Crew 7 who taught me a lot about the P-3. To AT1 Gus AT Shop supervisor in VP-9…the finest P-3 avionics technician I ever met. To AMH1 Dan “Boats” Beckett in VP-17 the best P-3 Flight Engineer I ever flew with. To the entire VP-17 Crew 10 with whom I shared so much. To my life long friends then AW2 Ron T. Whatley and AW1 Charlie Schoch…we have shared so many laughs and tears. To the finest Naval Officer I ever served and flew with then CDR. Dennis Graff Commanding Officer VP-47 1976-77 whose leadership always led the way. To the P-3 aircraft…the finest aircraft the Fleet has ever operated.
    [Show full text]
  • The USS BRAINE-DD630 Was Laid at the Bath Iron Works on October 12, 1942
    USS Braine (DD-630) The keel for the USS BRAINE-DD630 was laid at the Bath Iron Works on October 12, 1942. Accelerated construction continued until launching on March 7, 1943. During the construction period, the assembly of officers and crew began. The first officer to report was Ensign Arthur F. Moricca, a graduate engineer of Rennsalear Polytechnic Institute. The first Commanding Officer, Commander John F. Newman, Jr., USN soon reported to Bath. He was followed by officers Ensign John D. Hotchkiss, Asst. Engineering Officer; Lieutenant John T. Evans, First Lieutenant; Lt(jg) Henry J. Watters, Communications Officer; Ensign William M. Eastman, Supply Officer; Lieutenant George W. Montgomery, Gunnery Officer. The new officers and crew observed the construction of the ship to become familiar with its components and operation. Although it was winter, the crew members enjoyed the serenity of Maine and the delicious sea food served in the many restaurants in the area. On a crisp and breezy winter Maine day with ice still on the river, the sponsor’s party assembled. Mrs. Daniel L. Braine, Brooklyn, New York and wife of the grandson of Admiral Daniel Lawrence Braine, USN for whom the vessel was named, wielded the bottle of champagne. With traditional words, Mrs. Braine christened the new destroyer UNITED STATES SHIP BRAINE - DD630 and launched her into destroyer history. As the ship came to rest in the middle of the Kennebec River, it was obvious that there was still a lot of work to be done before the BRAINE could join the fleet. Installation of boilers, turbines, electric panels, gun mounts, communication and navigation equipment, as well as all the items to accommodate the crew’s living quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility, Support, Endurance : a Story of Naval Operational Logistics in The
    BMmi : "^ ; ;tl!!tl! sll> 1 i ^^^^^^^^^^H if m nil i iii 11 i im m MONGOLIA ; X)SUKA CHI CHI JIMA N AWA ^ti^?=^"a:PCKNER BAY 'AN ISIUNG 'ING HARBOR ^i^JtlAM \0! PPINE: EQUATO-B- Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/mobilitysupporteOOhoop QXfOP,0(^ MOBILITY, SUPPORT ENDURANCE A Story of Naval Operational Logistics in the Vietnam War 1965-1968 by VICE ADMIRAL EDWIN BICKFORD HOOPER, USN (Retired) NAVAL HISTORY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON, D.C., 1972 LC Card 76-184047 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1972 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402—Price S4.25 Stock Number 0846-0057 Dedication Dedicated to the logisticians of all Services and in all wars, and in particular, to the dedicated, and often heroic, ofl&cers and men of the Service Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet. UNNTED STATES NH-74351 The globe as viewed from over the intersection of the Date Line and Equator. Foreword In narrating the naval history of a war, one approach open to a historian is to record the general story of naval operations, then complement the main history with works dealing with specialized fields. The Naval History Division plans to follow this approach in the case of the Vietnam War, focusing the Division's efforts primarily on an account of naval operations but accompanying the major history with publications in limited fields deserving of treatment beyond that to be given in the main work.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Note Nineteen: 2013 Vietnam Veterans Memorial Interventions Daniel R
    WALL NOTE NINETEEN: 2013 VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL INTERVENTIONS DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 19 JULY 2013 01. PURPOSE. This Wall Note lists the name, date of incident, and Wall location associated with each of the thirty service members that compose the 2013 Wall Interventions. A short summary of the incident associated with each name is included. The names are divided into four categories: (01) name additions, (02) names whose remains have been identified and whose symbol was changed from a plus to a diamond, (03) names whose remains have been identified and who already had a diamond symbol, and (04) a name which did not have a symbol. As of 20 June 2013 the Department of Defense (DOD) military unaccounted for number is 1,614. The Wall “missing” number is 736. See Wall Note Eighteen: U.S. Unaccounted For in Southeast Asia and East Asia (Update Four) for an explanation of why there is an 878 number difference. 02. DISCLAIMER. This Wall Note in not an official publication of the U.S. National Park Service (USNPS), the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund (VVMF), or the DOD. Linda R. M. SEALE and USNPS volunteer Donald ADAM provided proofreading support. Any errors are solely mine. Comments/corrections are solicited. 03. ANNOTATED MAPS/CHARTS. The annotated 1:50,000 scale AMS maps and 1:500,000 scale TPC charts are provided through the courtesy and permission of U.S. Army tanker (1st Battalion, 69th Armor) Viet Nam veteran Ray SMITH. Click on the orange icons on the maps for amplifying information.
    [Show full text]