Wall Note Nineteen: 2013 Vietnam Veterans Memorial Interventions Daniel R
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Always a Marine” Men’S Hoodie for Me City State Zip in the Size Indicated Below As Described in This Announcement
MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES 4 1 0 2 LY U J Leathernwwew.mca-marcines.org/lekatherneck Happy Birthday, America Iraq 2004: Firefghts in the “City of Mosques” Riding With the Mounted Color Guard Settling Scores: The Battle to Take Back Guam A Publication of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation Cov1.indd 1 6/12/14 12:04 PM Welcome to Leatherneck Magazine’s Digital Edition July 2014 We hope you are continuing to enjoy the digital edition of Leatherneck with its added content and custom links to related information. Our commitment to expanding our digital offerings continues to refect progress. Also, access to added content is available via our website at www.mca- marines.org/leatherneck and you will fnd reading your Leatherneck much easier on smartphones and tablets. Our focus of effort has been on improving our offerings on the Internet, so we want to hear from you. How are we doing? Let us know at: [email protected]. Thank you for your continuing support. Semper Fidelis, Col Mary H. Reinwald, USMC (Ret) Editor How do I navigate through this digital edition? Click here. L If you need your username and password, call 1-866-622-1775. Welcome Page Single R New Style.indd 2 6/12/14 11:58 AM ALWAYS FAITHFUL. ALWAYS READY. Cov2.indd 1 6/9/14 10:31 AM JULY 2014, VOL. XCVII, No. 7 Contents LEATHERNECK—MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES FEATURES 10 The In-Between: Touring the Korean DMZ 30 100 Years Ago: Marines at Vera Cruz By Roxanne Baker By J. -
From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas
From Stalingrad to Khe Sanh: Factors in the Successful Use of Tactical Airlift to Support Isolated Land Battle Areas Dr. David K. Vaughan, Air Force Institute of Technology Major James H. Donoho, Air Combat Command In the last several years, the U. S. Air Force has provided key aerial logistics support for a number of relatively isolated locations where the threat of hostile fire has existed, including Tuzla and Mogadishu. Our airlift forces have been fortunate in that they have been able to conduct their operations into these remote locations successfully and, for the most part, safely. In crucial situations, necessary supplies—ammunition, food, fuel, equipment—are usually delivered by tactical airlift aircraft. From the earliest days, tactical airlift has tried to keep the losses small while delivering the greatest amount of supplies to the people who need it. Unfortunately, in spite of the best intentions of operational planners, that goal is not easily achieved. An examination of three instances should help to illustrate this fact and to suggest some essential aspects of successful tactical airlift in crisis situations. Three twentieth century land battles stand out for the role played by tactical airlift in affecting the outcome: the battle for Stalingrad in 1942-43, the siege at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, and the attack on Khe Sanh in 1968. In each of these three cases, the units under siege were located at some distance (100-200 miles) from their supply bases. Attempts were made in each situation to supply the besieged units through the use of airlift. In each case, the duration of the airlift support effort was about two months. -
Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam. -
Wall Note Sixteen: 2012 Vietnam Veterans Memorial Interventions
WALL NOTE SIXTEEN: 2012 VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL INTERVENTIONS DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 23 MAY 2012 01. PURPOSE. This Wall Note lists the names and locations of the twenty-three service members that compose the 2012 Wall Interventions. The names are divided into three categories: (01) Name Additions, (02) Status Changes, and (03) a Spelling Correction. As in previous years, the original 2012 VVMF list included the names of those whose remains were returned and identified and who already had a diamond symbol; the final 2012 VVMF Interventions list did not include this category. Since I already did most of the research regarding these names, I include them in this Wall Note; their stories include examples of the methodology of how remains are returned and identified. Paragraph 05 contains: (01) a list of all the names, (02) date of incident, (03) date of death, (04) date remains were returned, and (05) date remains were identified. Paragraphs 06 and 07 contain a chronological description of the incidents associated with each name. This information may be helpful for rangers and volunteers to answer Wall visitor questions. A. For the “down-in-the-weeds” readers, “value-added” Indochina historical comments may be found in paragraphs: (01) 06.B. (26 May 1966 Incident), (02) 07.A. (15 March 1966 Incident), (03) 07.D. (03 July 1966 Incident), (04) 07.I. (07 February 1968 Incident), and (05) 08. A Special Note. 02. DISCLAIMER. This Wall Note is not an official publication of the U.S. National Park Service (USNPS), the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund (VVMF), or the Department of Defense (DOD). -
Airpower in Three Wars
AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom). -
Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet
Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet † US Troops Who Served in South Vietnam January 1965 – March 1973: 2,594,000 * US Troops from Wisconsin who served in Vietnam: 165,400 * Surviving Vietnam Veterans who are disabled: 11% Average age of the Vietnam War GI: † 19 US Casualties † Killed in Action 47,418 Non-hostile Deaths 10,811 Hospitalized Wounded 153,329 Non-Hospitalized Wounded 150,375 Missing in Action 2338 (at war’s end) Prisoners of War 766 (114 died in captivity) Wisconsin Casualties Killed in Action ‡ 1241 – Missing in Action # 37 Timeline 1950 – 1975 † Beginning of US advisory war in Vietnam. AUG 1950 Battle of Dien Bien Phu. First US casualties in advisory war. MAR – MAY 1954 Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Beginning of US combat operations. AUG 1964 First US POW taken. Operation Rolling Thunder begins bombing raids on North Vietnam. MAR 1965 Marines land at Da Nang. Start of the ground war. MAR 1965 Operation Game Warden begins US Navy inland waterway interdiction. APR 1966 Battle of Khe Sanh. Marines come under siege for 77 days. US KIA 205. JAN – APR 1968 Tet Offensive. US KIA 3,895. Turning point in the war. JAN – FEB 1968 Operation Rolling Thunder Ends. OCT 1968 Battle of Hamburger Hill. After 11 assaults, 1000 troops of the 101st Airborne MAY 1969 capture Hill 937 in the A Shau Valley. US KIA 70. US Navy ends inland waterway combat. DEC 1970 Operation Linebacker/Linebacker I/Linebacker II. Throughout 1972 Concentrated bombing of North Vietnam. Operation Homecoming begins. Release of US POWs. FEB 1973 Last US Ground Troops Leave Vietnam. -
PIAMA 26 a Historical Appreciation of Naval Air Power
Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 26 Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 26 A Historical Appreciation of the Contribution of Naval Air Power A Historical Appreciation Of The Contribution Naval Air Power A Historical Appreciation Andrew T Ross and James M Sandison with an introduction by Jack McCaffrie A.T. Ross and J.M. Sandison A.T. SEA POWER CENTRE - AUSTRALIA A HISTORICAL APPRECIATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF NAVAL AIR POWER © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, and with standard source credit included, no part may be reproduced without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to the Director, Sea Power Centre - Australia, Department of Defence, CANBERRA ACT 2600. National Library of Australian Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Ross, A.T. 1948- Sandison, J.M. 1932- McCaffrie, J. 1948- A historical appreciation of the contribution of naval air power ISSN 1327-5658 ISBN 978-0-642-2965-5 A HISTORICAL APPRECIATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF NAVAL AIR POWER by Andrew T. Ross and James M. Sandison with an introduction by Jack McCaffrie iv Disclaimer The views expressed are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Government of Australia, the Department of Defence and the Royal Australian Navy. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this publication. Sea Power Centre – Australia The Sea Power Centre – Australia (SPC-A), was established to undertake activities to promote the study, discussion and awareness of maritime issues and strategy within the RAN and the Defence and civil communities at large. -
Vietnam Student Questions
Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions Challenge: Using the map of the exhibition on the right, find the objects listed below. Use your observations and the labels to answer the questions in the spaces provided. 7b 5a 7a 4a 8a 6a 9a 8b 10a 3b 2b 3a 10b 2a 1a 1. Introduction 6. Dangerous Skies 1a. Introduction Wall 6a. Survival, Escape and Evasion Kit 2. Cold War Fears 7. Missing in Action and Prisoners of War 2a. Map of Vietnam 7a. Photograph of U.S. Prisoners of War 2b. Domino Theory Cartoon 7b. POW: Lt. Wilson Denver “Denny” Key Screen 3. Facts and Fictions 8. The Unpopular War 3a. Gulf of Tonkin Wall 8a. Photographs of Protest 3b. Gulf of Tonkin Screen 8b. Photograph of Flag-Covered Caskets 4. The Air War 9. The Intrepid Four 4a. The Air War Panel 9a. Newspaper, 1968 5. 3,000 Men 10. Coming Home 5a. U.S. Navy Recruitment Poster 10a. Photographs of Helicopter and Refugees 10b. Photographs of Intrepid Returning Home Name______________________________ On the Line: Intrepid and the Vietnam War Exhibition Questions 1. Introduction 1a. Introduction Wall From what or whose perspective is this exhibition told? How do you think this perspective may differ from troops fighting on the ground? 2. Cold War Fears 2a. Map of Vietnam Look at the map and read the first paragraph of the “Gulf of Tonkin” panel to your left. Before the war, North Vietnam, which was led by Ho Chi Minh, strove for an independent, unified and Communist Vietnam. Why do you think the United States would have wanted to prevent the North Vietnamese from reaching South Vietnam? 2b. -
Media Coverage of the War
Media Coverage of the War No Censorship The ability of the news media to be present throughout Vietnam and cover the war without censorship was unique - - such reporting freedom did not exist before that conflict and hasn’t since. The absence of censorship appears to have been a development that was not given a great deal of thought - - somewhat like the war itself. Under the Kennedy Administration, with relatively few boots on the ground and scarcely any US reporters on the scene, press coverage of events in Vietnam was sparse until the Buddhist protests against Diem’s policies. And in the Administration belated and bungled reaction to that crisis, press censorship was apparently not considered. President Johnson’s efforts to downplay the seriousness of the conflict and paint a rosy picture of Vietnam was a major factor in his administration’s decision not to impose some form of censorship - - since censorship might alert Congress and the public that the US effort was not going as well as the White House said it was. In addition, until 1967 press coverage of America’s conduct of the war was generally very positive. Even reporters who were critical of the military’s conduct of the war, such as Neil Sheehan or David Halberstam in their accounts of the battle of An Bac in 1963, didn’t question the underlying purpose of the war until much later. In Armies of the Night, published in early 1968, Norman Mailer portrayed the mainstream press as highly critical of the anti- war movement and almost a cheerleader for the Johnson Administration. -
3Dmarine Division Fmf (-) (Rein)
DECLASSIFIED SAMARINED 3DMARINE DIVISION FMF (-) (REIN) / MMA OC vv"ND5.u twRoMUNOLOGY for the month of JULY, 19*69 NcOa qSI~LAS9RE~ DECLASSIFIED I DECLASSIFIED 9 28/rad 5750 ~1 i U b S mus NOV 0 5 188 ,(Unclassified upon removal of the basic letter) SECOND ENDORSEMENT on CG, 3d MarDiv ltr 3/WEB/rwb over 5750 Ser: 003A25869 dtd 15 September 1969 From: Commanding General, Fleet Marine Force, Pacific To: Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code AO3D) Subj: Command Chronology for period 1-31 July 1969 1. The subject chronology has been reviewed for completeness and is forwarded herewith. R. D. WHITE By direction Copy to: CG, 3d MarDiv CG, III MAF 0WASS";F,E gji 3 4 DECLASSIFIED DECLASSIFIED SECRET 3K/Jld 5750/1 Ser: UNC IAIjJ 12 OCT 1969 (Unclassified upon removal from the basic letter) 0 011 7 3 6 9 FIRST ENDORSEMENT on OG, 3d MarDiv ltr 3/WEB/rwb over 5750 Seri 003A25869 of 15 Sep 1969 From: Commanding General, III Marine Amphibious Force Tos Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code A03D) Via: Commanding General, IFleet Marine Force, Pacific Subj: Command Chronology for period 1 through 31 July 1969 (U) 1. Forwarded. BY ODRE0CTIO Copy to: CG, 3d MarDiv ),, 00 I 2 eelFII COPY N4 OF/OFJ COPIES DECLASSIFIED DECLASSIFIED HEADQUARTERS -3dMarli Division (-)(ItRein), MP FPO San Prancisco 96602 3,/WEB/rwb 5750 Seri 003A25669 lf1 St' V4 .classified-ii when enclosureo removed Prou5 ComandMitig General Commandant of the Marine Corps (AO3D) vis.$Toia 1) 0Co-•iding General, III Marine Amphibious Force 2 Oommrdln General, sFleet Marine Force Pacific Sub ,is Command Chronoloff for period 1 through 31 July 1969 (U) Reals ( WO P5750.1A b MPACO 5750.SA •n,lsI(1) 3d Marine Division (-)(R•ein), PNMP Command Chronology 1. -
Teacher Help Guide
TEACHER HELP GUIDE LESSON PLAN: The Nuclear Umbrella – Still Here After the Cold War DEVELOPED BY: John Clark, science teacher and military historian, Deltona High School, Deltona, FL 2012 Naval Historical Foundation STEM-H Teacher Fellowship INSTRUCTIONAL GOAL: (history) The Cold War period is required study under the educational standards of many states. This lesson offers an original way to cover that period in American history and potentially raise student achievement through its uniqueness. BACKGROUND: The Cold War is officially over but the threat from the evolution of nuclear weapons that created that war remains and is growing. Students need to understand that an attack on the United States by a nuclear weapon is still a very real possibility. Make the Cold War come alive for your students by using the resources and web site of the Cold War Gallery at the Naval Museum in Washington, D.C. to educate today’s students about the realities of living under a nuclear umbrella. Focusing on the role of the Navy during this long and tense 45 year period is a great way to build student interest in learning about an important chapter in recent American history. Students will gain a perspective of how living under the nuclear umbrella has evolved to present day. Our future citizens need to internalize the continuing dangers and the threat to American life evolving from the spread of nuclear weapons around the globe. If you cannot come to the museum you can use its resources by taking your students on a virtual tour of the gallery. -
The In-Country War by John T
In South Vietnam, airpower was subor- dinated to a ground strategy—and the ground strategy didn’t work. A F-100 Supersabre sends a 750-pound bomb hurtling toward its target in Vietnam. The In-Country War by John T. Correll he prevailing military wis- US involvement began as advice Vietnam, directed by political decisions, dom going into the 1960s was and training for the South Vietnamese was essentially that of a war of attrition,” that the United States should armed forces but the mission expanded. said Army Gen. William C. Westmore- Tnot get bogged down in a ground war in In mid-1965, the United States plunged land, commander of Military Assistance Asia. This admonition was well known into what it had so often been warned Command Vietnam, MACV. to policy-makers in the White House and against—a land war in Asia. By the end The assumption was that “search the Pentagon as they struggled with the of 1965, there were 155,000 US troops and destroy” operations could win the impending problem of Vietnam. on the ground in South Vietnam, with war in the South by inflicting more In late April of 1961, the new Presi- more on the way. casualties than the enemy was prepared dent, John F. Kennedy, was cautioned By decree from Washington, the to withstand. Westmoreland—who de- again by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, who “In-Country” War in South Vietnam vised the attrition strategy—dismissed had fought two wars in the Pacific and took precedence over all other efforts any concern about “Asia’s legendary Far East.