406964062018.Pdf
Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology ISSN: 1809-4341 Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) Dulley, Iracema; Sampaio, Luísa Tui Accusation and Legitimacy in the Civil War in Angola1 Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, vol. 17, e17355, 2020 Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) DOI: 10.1590/1809-43412020v17a355 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=406964062018 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Article Accusation and Legitimacy in the Civil War in Angola Iracema Dulley 1 Luísa Tui Sampaio 1 1 Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Departamento de Ciências Sociais, São Carlos/SP, Brasil Abstract This article analyses the main categories of accusation found in the speeches of leaders from the People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) during the Civil War in Angola (1975-2002). Seeking to understand the entanglements between the global and local dimensions of the conflict, we argue that the accusations made by Agostinho Neto (MPLA), José Eduardo dos Santos (MPLA), and Jonas Savimbi (UNITA) aimed to delegitimize the ‘other’ in the act of claiming legitimacy to occupy the state. This is achieved through the opposition between accusatory categories attributed to the ‘other’ and their inverse, categories attributed to the person making the accusation. We thereby show how the understanding of political conflicts in general, and the conflict in Angola specifically, can be illuminated through the analysis of categories whose linguistic dimension is entangled with historically constituted social positionalities.
[Show full text]