Designing for Transit Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Designing for Transit Manual Designing for Transit A Manual for Integrating Public Transportation and Land Development in the San Diego Metropolitan Area February 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Chief Executive Officer Paul C. Jablonski Board of Directors Chair Georgette Gómez, San Diego City Council Board Members David Alvarez, San Diego City Council David Arambula, Lemon Grove City Council Lorie Bragg, Mayor Pro Tem, Imperial Beach Myrtle Cole, San Diego City Council Jim Cunningham, Poway City Council Mike Diaz, Chula Vista City Council Kevin Faulconer, Mayor, City of San Diego Ronn Hall, Santee City Council Bob McClellan, El Cajon City Council Guy McWhirter, La Mesa City Council Mona Rios, (Vice Chair of MTS Board), National City City Council Ron Roberts, Board of Supervisors, County of San Diego Mary Salas, Mayor, City of Chula Vista Bill Sandke, Coronado City Council © 2018 MTS Reproduction of portions of this report for educational purposes is permitted, as long as credit is given to the Metropolitan Transit System. Metropolitan Transit System Designing for Transit | i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Making Transit Work Better for Your Community 9 3 Ten Ways to Design More Transit-Oriented Communities 23 4 Design Standards for Bus Transit 37 5 Development Around Light Rail Transit 55 Metropolitan Transit System Designing for Transit | iii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................. 1 3 TEN WAYS TO DESIGN MORE TRANSIT-ORIENTED About This Manual ........................................ 3 COMMUNITIES .............................. 23 Public Transportation in San Diego ...................................... 4 Principles .................................................... 24 Historical Background .......................... 4 1. Create a Pedestrian Friendly Making the Land Use Connection ................ 6 Environment..................................... 25 2. Make Pedestrian Facilities a Priority ...... 26 2 MAKING TRANSIT WORK BETTER 3. Design Building Sites to Serve FOR YOUR COMMUNITY ............... 9 Many Users ...................................... 27 4. Encourage a Mixture of Land Uses ........ 28 Transit Priority Measures ............................ 10 5. Provide Appropriate Densities ................ 29 Queue Jumps ..................................... 10 Commercial: Retail ............................. 30 Transit Signal Progression & Industrial ............................................. 30 Active Transit Signal Priority .............11 Bus Bulbs ........................................... 12 6. Interconnect the Street System .............. 31 Complete Streets and 7. Narrow the Neighborhood Street ............ 32 Active Transportation ....................... 13 8. Be Cautious of Major Streets.................. 33 Access to Transit ................................ 13 9. Integrate Transit into the Community...... 34 Station Amenities ................................ 14 Pedestrian Infrastructure .................... 15 10. Consider Transit Linkage in Advance ... 35 Bicycle Infrastructure .......................... 16 Traffic Calming ................................... 16 4 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR Stormwater and Drainage BUS TRANSIT ................................. 37 Requirements Near Transit .............. 17 Community Events, Special Events, and Design Standards for Bus Transit ............... 38 Construction Coordination ............... 18 Community Events ............................. 18 Special Events Coordination .............. 18 Construction Coordination .................. 19 Bicycle and Transit Streets ......................... 20 Future Transit Signal Priority Corridors ...... 21 iv | February 2018 CONTENTS Figure 2-14 Transit Street with 5 DEVELOPMENT AROUND Bike Lanes ............................................ 20 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT ..................... 55 Figure 2-15 Shared Transit and Bike Develop Around Light Lanes are Not Recommended ............. 20 Rail Transit ....................................... 56 Figure 3-1 Protected Pedestrian Median Refuge ..................................... 26 Transit-Oriented Land Development Figure 3-2 Strategic placement of office Policies ............................................ 57 buildings increases accessibility for Overview ............................................ 57 transit users .......................................... 27 What Local Government Can Do ....... 59 Figure 3-1 Connected networks improve Providing for Public/Private access to transit ................................... 31 Partnerships in Transit ..................... 60 Figure 3-3 Simple improvements General Plan ...................................... 60 enhance the urban environment ......... 35 Circulation Element ............................ 61 Specific Plans, Master Plans, Figure 4-1a Bus Vehicle Dimensions ........ 39 and Corridor Plans ........................... 63 Figure 4-1b Bus Vehicle Dimensions ........ 40 Implementing Ordinances .................. 63 Figure 4-2a Bus Turning Template, 40’ Standard Bus ................................. 41 Conclusion .................................................. 64 Figure 4-2b Bus Turning Template, MTS contacts.............................................. 65 45’ Commuter Bus ............................... 42 References ................................................. 65 Figure 4-3 Vertical and Horizontal Local References ............................... 65 Clearances for Buses ........................... 43 National References ........................... 65 Figure 4-4 Pavement Composition Recommendations ............................... 44 Figure 4-5 Bus Passenger Shelter FIGURES Placement ............................................ 45 Figure 1-1 Metropolitan Transit Figure 4-6 Bus Turnarounds ..................... 46 System Map, 2017 ................................. 7 Figure 4-7 Intersection Design Figure 2-1 Queue Jumps .......................... 10 for Bus Turns ........................................ 47 Figure 2-2 Transit Signal Progression ....... 11 Figure 4-8 Intersection Design Figure 2-3 Bus Bulbs ................................. 12 for Bus Turns at Pedestrian Bulbs ...... 48 Figure 2-4 Complete Street Elements ..... 13 Figure 4-9 Bus Stop Dimensions Figure 2-5 MTS RAPID Station ................. 14 with In-Lane Stops ............................... 49 Figure 2-6 Sidewalk Widening .................. 15 Figure 4-10 Bus Pull-Out Stops and Figure 2-7 Parklet ...................................... 15 Dimensions ........................................... 50 Figure 2-8 Curb Extension ........................ 16 Figure 4-11 Off-Street Bus Station ........... 51 Figure 2-9 Bike Share Station .................. 16 Figure 4-12 Bus Passenger Shelters Figure 2-10 Lane width and speed (Non-Advertising) ................................. 52 correlation ............................................ 17 Figure 4-13 Bus Passenger Shelters Figure 2-11 Speed Table ........................... 17 (Advertising) ......................................... 53 Figure 2-12 Speed Cushions .................... 17 Figure 2-13 Curb extension impacting a bus stop ............................................ 17 Metropolitan Transit System Designing for Transit | v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Introduction 1 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and supporting federal accessibility regulations must always be accommodated in the design of transit facilities. Modifications to accessibility reg- ulations may supersede the guidance in this document. All applicable regulations should be reviewed prior to the design of any transit-related project. 1 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THIS MANUAL This manual will be updated from time to time. Your ideas and contributions are welcomed. This manual is designed to help planners, Please send them to the MTS Planning De- developers, architects, and engineers un- partment, 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000, derstand the physical requirements of public San Diego, CA 92101-7490. transportation. It also has important value to elected officials and city administrators as they formulate transit-supportive policies to achieve climate action goals The manual consists of five sections. This in- troduction is the first section, providing back- ground material on transit in the San Diego region and the need for its coordination with land development. The second section pres- ents measures which can improve transit ser- vice and enhance safe access to transit on local streets through Complete Streets design strategies. The third section presents general guidelines on how to design development in a more transit-supportive way. It details how to make residential and commercial areas more conducive to walking and to the use of bus- es and light rail. It is followed by two sections giving specific design standards for public transportation facilities and vehicles, one sec- tion for bus transit and one for light rail transit. Metropolitan Transit System Designing for Transit | 3 1 INTRODUCTION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION mules, and later by steam and cable power. Under the leadership of the San Diego Electric IN SAN DIEGO Railway Company, these were soon replaced Public transportation is a vital piece of region- by electric streetcar lines, which expand- al infrastructure. Hundreds of thousands of ed throughout the city. Long-distance runs people across the San Diego region depend into the countryside were served by heavier on it every day. This reliance on public trans- interurban electric
Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Queue Jumpers and Transit Signal Priority on Bus
    IMPACTS OF QUEUE JUMPERS AND TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT by R. M. Zahid Reza A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of College of Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida August 2012 Copyright by R. M. Zahid Reza 2012 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am heartily thankful to my supervisor Dr. Aleksandar Stevanovic for his expertise and circumspective guidance and support all through my graduate studies at the Florida Atlantic University. I also want to thank Dr. Khaled Sobhan for giving me an opportunity to pursuing higher study and Dr. Evangelos Kaisar for his helpful suggestions and comments during my research work. I would like to expand my thanks to Dr. Milan Zlatkovic, from the University of Utah whose sincere judgment and recommendations helped me to carry out the study. Finally, I would like to express my special thanks to my family whose continuous supports and encouragement was constant source of stimulus for this work. iv ABSTRACT Author: R. M. Zahid Reza Title: Impacts of Queue Jumpers and Transit Signal Priority on Bus Rapid Transit Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Aleksandar Stevanovic Degree: Master of Science Year: 2012 Exclusive bus lanes and the Transit Signal Priority are often not effective in saturated peak-traffic conditions. An alternative way of providing priority for transit can be queue jumpers, which allows buses to bypass and then cut out in front of waiting queue by getting an early green signal. Utah Transit Authority deployed Bus Rapid Transit system at Salt Lake County, Utah along W 3500 S.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Street Project Flyer ENGLISH
    16th Street Improvement Project We’re Moving Muni Forward As part of Muni Forward, SFMTA is adding transit and safety improvements along the 22 Fillmore route that will make it safer to walk and bike, increase the reliability of transit service and enhance the customer experience on and off the bus. Project Overview BENEFITS AT A GLANCE The 16th Street Improvement Project aims to improve transit reliability and Reduce travel travel time for the 18,000 customers who ride Muni along the corridor on time by almost an average weekday, while enhancing safety and accessibility. It will address transportation needs of current and future residents, workers and visitors to the southeastern portion of the 22 Fillmore route along 2.3 miles of 16th Street. The 25% project also features utility upgrades as well as new trees, sidewalks and bus shelters. To allow for zero-emission transit service into Mission Bay, the project includes extending the overhead contact system (OCS) that powers our trolley buses on 16th Street from Kansas to Third streets. Additionally, new bike lanes have been added to 17th Street to create a continuous route from Mission Bay to the Mission neighborhood. Wider sidewalks at intersections This project is part of Muni Forward, an ongoing initiative to create a safe, reli- and bus bulb outs for safer able and comfortable experience on and off transit. crossings for people walking and quicker bus boardings. Schedule Stay Connected Construction will occur in two phases. First will be Potrero Hill/ Sign-up to get project updates and alerts: Mission Bay, followed by the Mission neighborhood section.
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Passage
    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Utica Avenue Select Bus Service Workshop Summary | November 13, 2014
    Utica Avenue Select Bus Service Workshop Summary | November 13, 2014 New York City Transit +selectbusservice , Utica Avenue On November 13, 2014, the New York City transit signal priority to improve the quality and Department of Transportation (DOT) and the performance of transit and, in turn, to improve Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) kicked mobility and access in the neighborhoods that off the public outreach process for the Utica it serves. SBS projects are designed to make it Avenue Select Bus Service (SBS) project. The MTA easier, safer, and more comfortable to travel by and DOT hosted a public workshop at PS 167 on bus, through features like bus bulbs, high-quality Eastern Parkway to gather initial feedback from passenger information, and overall attention to community members on plans to upgrade the B46 pedestrian and vehicular safety. limited bus to Select Bus Service. The project aims to improve bus service while maintaining traffic Utica Avenue Select Bus Service flow and curb access and to increase safety for all During the 2009 Bus Rapid Transit Phase II users along the Utica Avenue corridor in Brooklyn. Study, Brooklyn community members identified Utica Avenue as a corridor that could support The workshop brought together community and benefit from a Select Bus Service project. members, bus riders, transit advocates, Sixty-one percent of residents along the corridor representatives from elected offices, community commute to work on public transit. However, the boards, and police precincts to share their route is characterized by slow and crowded bus experiences as transit riders, drivers, and trips. The community ranked the Utica Avenue B46 pedestrians traveling along the Utica Avenue corridor as one of two corridors most in need of corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Transportation Optimization and Bus Priority Measures Future of MBTA Bus Operations
    Surface Transportation Optimization and Bus Priority Measures Future of MBTA Bus Operations Project Sponsored by Thursday, May 29, 2014 Executive Summary • Bus transit is a critical component of the MBTA services and will be for the foreseeable future • Corridor study demonstrated ability to increase reliability for multiple routes • Some fleet replacement and maintenance facility issues coming to a head • Opportunities exist to cost‐effectively reduce MBTA’s carbon footprint through fleet and infrastructure investments 2 Agenda • Why Bus Transportation Important • Operational Reliability through Bus Priority Measures • Alternative Propulsion for a Sustainable Future • Bringing it all together: Pilot Opportunities 3 Why is Bus Transportation Important • Large percentage of MBTA ridership (~30%) o Still Growing…11% growth in unlinked passenger trips from Jan 2007 to Mar 2012 • Environmental justice Minority Low Income English Proficiency* Bus 37% 21% 0.63% Rapid Transit 27% 13% 0.14% Commuter Rail 11% 2% 0.02% 4 Why is Bus Transportation Important • Mobility o 34% of bus users have no household vehicle • Service availability (Coverage) o % of street miles covered by transit market Bus Subway Commuter Rail Total 73% 7% 3% • Lower capital cost to implement bus improvements vs. rail • Public transportation’s role in global warming 5 Project Methodology • Researched bus priority best practices • Researched alternative propulsion systems • Fact finding mission – London, UK • Developed corridor selection criteria/methodology • Developed conceptual
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING GUIDE for Public Transportation Elevators Table of Contents
    PLANNING GUIDE FOR Public transportation elevators Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................4 1.1 About this Planning Guide ............................................................................................4 1.2 About KONE .................................................................................................................4 2. Special demands of public transportation ........................................................... 7 2.1 Airports ........................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 Benefits of KONE elevators for airports ...................................................................................... 7 2.2 Transit centers (railway and metro ststions) ...................................................................8 2.2.1 Benefits of KONE elevators in railway and metro stations .......................................................... 8 2.3 Main specifications for public transportation elevators ...............................................10 2.4 Electromagnetic compatibility standards ....................................................................11 2.5 LSH and LH cables ......................................................................................................11 3. Odering a public transportation elevator ...........................................................12 3.1 Key cost drivers for elevators in
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTA Bus Stop Design Guidelines
    The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is The symbol in our logo is adapted from the dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning official DVRPC seal professionals and the public with a common vision of and is designed as a making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we stylized image of the live, work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as improving transportation, promoting smart growth, a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, New Jersey. Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENCY PROFILE and FACTS RTD Services at a Glance
    AGENCY PROFILE AND FACTS RTD Services at a Glance Buses & Rail SeniorRide SportsRides Buses and trains connect SeniorRide buses provide Take RTD to a local the metro area and offer an essential service to our sporting event, Eldora an easy RTDway to Denver services senior citizen at community. a glanceMountain Resort, or the International Airport. BolderBoulder. Buses and trains connect and the metro trainsarea and offer an easy way to Denver International Airport. Access-a-Ride Free MallRide Access-a-RideAccess-a-Ride helps meet the Freetravel MallRideneeds of passengers buses with disabilities.Park-n-Rides Access-a-RideFlexRide helps connect the entire length Make connections with meet theFlexRide travel needsbuses travel of within selectof downtown’s RTD service areas.16th Catch FlexRideour to connect buses toand other trains RTD at bus or passengerstrain with servies disabilities. or get direct accessStreet to shopping Mall. malls, schools, and more.89 Park-n-Rides. SeniorRide SeniorRide buses serve our senior community. Free MallRide FlexRideFree MallRide buses stop everyFree block onMetroRide downtown’s 16th Street Mall.Bike-n-Ride FlexRideFree buses MetroRide travel within Free MetroRide buses Bring your bike with you select RTDFree service MetroRide areas. buses offer convenientoffer convenient connections rush-hour for downtown commuterson the bus along and 18th train. and 19th Connectstreets. to other RTD connections for downtown SportsRides buses or trains or get direct commuters along 18th and Take RTD to a local sporting event, Eldora Mountain Resort, or the BolderBoulder. access toPark-n-Rides shopping malls, 19th streets. schools, Makeand more.connections with our buses and trains at more than 89 Park-n-Rides.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Transit Equity: Metrobus Service Guidelines
    Executive Committee Action Item IV-A December 10, 2020 Framework for Transit Equity: Metrobus Service Guidelines Page 36 of 105 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202236 Yes No TITLE: Framework for Transit Equity: Metrobus Guidelines PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Action item to request adoption of Metrobus Service Guidelines PURPOSE: Staff will recommend Board adoption of new Metrobus Service Guidelines. DESCRIPTION: This presentation will update the Board on changes to the draft Service Guidelines based on comments from Metro’s jurisdictional partners and local bus service providers. Summary results from the application of the guidelines to Metrobus Lines/Routes will be provided based on data from July 2019-February 2020. A discussion of how the results can be used to improve bus service and equity will be provided. Staff will recommend Board adoption of Metrobus Service Guidelines to inform future service plans. Contractors and Interested Parties Involved in the Service Guidelines and Annual Line Performance Work: AECOM, Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning, and IBI Group Key Highlights: • Metrobus Service guidelines are fundamental to ensuring equitable service across the region and are one of the main building blocks for service planning, budget decisions, and conducting a network redesign. Metrobus Service guidelines have not been updated since 2000. • Improving Metrobus directly helps address longstanding inequities in the region. • Updating Metrobus service guidelines was a Bus Transformation Project recommendation and was widely supported by our jurisdictional partners. The guidelines will create a clear and formalized approach to routing, service, and budget decisions. • Feedback from jurisdictions and local bus providers is incorporated into the service guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Assessing the ROI for High-Speed and Intercity Rail Projects
    Framework for Assessing the ROI for High-Speed and Intercity Rail Projects Prepared for: American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Prepared by: The Urban Transportation Center (UTC), University of Illinois at Chicago with Economic Development Research Group (EDRG), Boston, MA Primary authors: P.S. Sriraj, PhD, Director, Urban Transportation Center at UIC Bo Zou, PhD, Assistant Professor, College of Engineering at UIC Steve Schlickman, JD, Senior Research Specialist Glen Weisbrod, EDR Group Contributing authors: Ahmadreza Talebian, PhD, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, UIC Kyle Schroeckenthaler, EDR Group Adam Blair, EDR Group June 2017 The Urban Transportation Center University of Illinois at Chicago 412 S. Peoria St., 340 CUPPAH, Chicago, IL 60607-7036 www.utc.uic.edu REPORT SPONSORS APTA BUSINESS MEMBERS Capitol Corridor HNTB WSP Mott McDonald Atkins HDR Quandel Consultants Al Engel Consulting TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM Charles Quandel, Quandel Consultants Ira Hirschman, WSP Sharon Greene, HDR Dominic Spaethling, HNTB Darnell Grisby, APTA APTA HIGH-SPEED AND INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP Anna Barry, Connecticut DOT Chair Al Engel, Al Engel Consulting Vice Chair Jennifer Bergener, Managing Director, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency Secretary Peter Gertler, HNTB Immediate Past Chair David Cameron, Teamsters Officer at Large Art Guzzetti, APTA Staff Advisor Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Priority for Brussels: Lessons from Zurich, Eindhoven, and Dublin
    Public Transport Priority for Brussels: Lessons from Zurich, Eindhoven, and Dublin Peter G. Furth Visiting Researcher, Université Libre de Bruxelles* Report Completed Under Sponsorship of the Brussels Capital Region Program “Research in Brussels” July 19, 2005 *Permanent position: Chair, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. Telephone +1.617.373.2447, email [email protected]. Acknowledgements Thank you to the many people who gave me time to share information about their traffic control and public transport systems: STIB: Alain Carle (Stratégie Clients), Christian Dochy (Dévelopment du Reseau), Jean-Claude Liekendael (Délegué Général à la Qualité), Louis-Hugo Sermeus and Freddy Vanneste (Définition et Gestion de l’Offre), Thierry Villers (Etudes d’Exploitation), Jean-Philippe Gerkens (Exploitation Métro). Brussels Capital Region: Michel Roorijck (A.E.D., program VICOM). Université Libre de Bruxelles: Martine Labbé (Service d’Informatique), my promoter during this research program. Zurich: Jürg Christen and Roger Gygli (City of Zurich, Dienstabteiling Verkehr DAV), A. Mathis (VBZ) Dublin: Margaret O’Mahony (Trinity University Dublin), Colin Hunt and Pat Mangan (Rep. of Ireland Department of Transport), Frank Allen and Jim Kilfeather (Railway Procurement Agency), Owen Keegan and David Traynor (Dublin City Council, Roads and Traffic Department). Peek Traffic, Amersfoort (NL): Siebe Turksma, Martin Schlief. 1 Introduction Priority for public transport is an objective of Brussels and other large cities. It is the key to breaking the vicious cycle of congestion that threatens to bring cities to gridlock. In that cycle, increasing private traffic makes public transport become slower and less reliable, especially because while motorists are free to seek less congested routes, public transport lines cannot simply change their path, and therefore suffer the worst congestion.
    [Show full text]