DOCSLIB.ORG

Clinch River, Environmental Report References in Support of Early Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clinch River, Environmental Report References in Support of Early Site 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 ORNL/TM--12074 DE93 007798 Environmental Sciences Division STATUS REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.1 Coordinator of Report Peter J. Lemiszki 1 RaNaye B. Dreier Richard H. Ketelle 2 Richard R. Lee2 David A. Lietzke 3 William M. McMaster 4 James L. Foreman _ Suk Young Lee Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3860 1Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1410 2Energy Division, ORNL 3Route 3, Rutledge, Tennessee 37861 41400 W. Raccoon Valley Road, HeiskeU, Tennessee 37754 Date Published--October 1992 Prepared for the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (Budget Activity EW 20 10 30 1) Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6285 managed by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 _)ISTRIBUTIOi4 O;- THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED% 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 History of Geologic and Geohydrologic Work at ORNL .......................... 5 1.2 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................... 7 2. AVAILABLE DATA ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Surface Geologic Data ..................................................................................... 9 2.2 Core .................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Geophysical Logs Database ......................................................................... 10 2.4 Seismic Reflection and Refraction Studies ................................................. 10 3. STRATIGRAPHY .......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 11 3.2 Rome Formation ............................................................................................ 14 3.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Previous St-udies .............................................................................. 14 3.2.3 Lithologic Description .................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Rome Formation Soils ..................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Rome Residuum .............................................................................. 16 3.3 Conasauga Group .......................................................................................... 18 3.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 18 3.3.2 General Description ....................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Pumpkin Valley Shale ................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Pumpkin Valley Shale Soil ........................................................... 23 3.3.5 Pumpkin Valley Residuum .......................................................... 24 3.3.6 Friendship Formation (Formerly Rutledge Limestone) ........... 25 3.3.7 Friendship Formation Soils .......................................................... 27 3.3.8 Rogersville Shale ............................................................................ 27 3.3.9 RogersviUe Shale Soils .................................................................. 28 3.3.10 Rogersville Residuum ................................................................... 28 3.3.11 Dismal Gap Formation (Formerly Maryville Limestone) ....... 29 3.3.12 Dismal Gap Formation Soils ........................................................ 31 3.3.13 Dismal Gap Residuum ................................................................. 32 3.3.14 Nolichucky Shale ........................................................................... 34 3.3.15 Nolichucky Shale Soils ................................................................. 38 3.3.16 Nolichucky Residuum .................................................................. 38 3.3.17 Maynardville Limestone .............................................................. 39 3.3.18 Maynardville Limestone Soils ..................................................... 40 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 3.3.19 Maynardville Residuum ............................................................... 41 3.4 Knox Group .................................................................................................... 41 3.4.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 41 3.4.2 General Description of Soils and Landforms ............................ 42 3.4.3 Copper Ridge Dolomite ............................................................... 45 3.4.4 Copper Ridge Soils ........................................................................ 46 3.4.5 Chepultepec Dolomite .................................................................. 47 3.4.6 Chelpultepec Soils ......................................................................... 47 3.4.7 Longview Dolomite ...................................................................... 48 3.4.8 Longview Soils ............................................................................... 48 3.4.9 Kingsport Formation .................................................................... 49 3.4.10 Kingsport Soils ................................................. .............................. 49 3.4.11 Mascot Dolomite ........................................................................... 49 3.4.12 Mascot Soils .................................................................................... 50 3.5 Chickamauga Group ..................................................................................... 51 3.5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 51 3.5.2 Bethel Valley Section ....................................................................... 51 3.5.2.1 Previous studies ................................................................ 51 3.5.2.2 Bethel Valley lithologic descriptions ............................. 54 Blackford Formation and Eidson Member of the Lincolnshire Formation ................................................. 54 Fleanor Member of the Lincolnshire Formation ............ 56 Rockdell Formation ............................................................ 56 Benbolt Formation .............................................................. 56 Bowen Formation ............................................................... 57 Witten Formation ............................................................... 57 Moccasin Formation ........................................................... 57 3.5.3 East Fork (Oak Ridge) Valley Section ........................................... 57 3.5.3.1 Previous studies ................................................................ 57 3.5.3.2 East Fork (Oak Ridge) lithologic descriptions .............. 59 Stones River Group ............................................................ 59 Pond Spring Formation ........................................... 59 Murfreesboro / Pierce Limestone ............................ 59 Ridley Limestone ...................................................... 60 Lebanon Limestone .................................................. 60 Carters Limestone .................................................... 60 Nashville Group ................................................................. 60 Hermitage Formation .............................................. 61 Cannon Limestone ................................................... 61 Catheys and Leipers Formations ........................... 61 3.5.4 Chickamauga Group Soils ............................................................. 61 3.5.5 Chickamauga Residuum ................................................................ 62 3.5.6 Chickainauga Colluvium ............................................................... 64 3.6 Reedsville Shale ............................................................................................. 65 3.7 Sequatchie Formation ................................................................................... 65 3.8 Rockwood Formation .................................................................................... 65 3.9 Reedsville Shale, Sequatchie, and Rockwood Formation Soils ............... 66 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 3.10 Residuum ...................................................................................................... 66 3.11 Chattanooga Shale ....................................................................................... 66 3.12 Fort Payne Formation ................................................................................. 67 3.13 Structural-lithic Unit Designations ........................................................... 68 4 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION SOIL SURVEY ..................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent Forrest Dalton McFarlin University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation McFarlin, Forrest Dalton, "Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2952. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Forrest Dalton McFarlin Texas Christian University Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2015 August 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Walter Manger, PhD Thesis Director _____________________________________ Adriana Potra, PhD Committee Member _____________________________________ Thomas McGilvery, PhD Committee Member ©2018 by Forrest Dalton McFarlin All Rights Reserved Abstract The Lower Mississippian interval comprises a single, third-order, eustatic cycle subdivided lithostratigraphically into the St. Joe Limestone (Hopkins 1893) and overlying Boone Formation (Branner 1891, Simonds 1891) with type areas in northern Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Soils A,\?) Saprolites from the Piedmont Region for M7aste Disposal Purposes
    CHARACTERIZATION OF SOILS A,\?) SAPROLITES FROM THE PIEDMONT REGION FOR M7ASTE DISPOSAL PURPOSES Aziz Amoozegar, Philip J. Schoeneberger , and Michael J. Vepraskas Soil Science Department Agricultural Research Service College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7619 The activities on which this report is based were financed in part by the United States Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey, through the Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina. Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement by the United States Government. Also, the use of trade names does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service of the products named nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned. Agreement No. 14-08-0001-G1580 UWProject Number 70091 USGS Project No. 02(FY88) ACKNOWLEDGMENT Special recognition should be given to Ms. Barbara Pitman, former Agricultural Research Technician, Soil Science Department, who devoted long hours conducting the laboratory solute flow experiments and assisted with other field and laboratory investigations in this project. Thanks to Mr. Stewart J. Starr, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, for providing land on Unit 1 Research Farm and for his patience with our research program. Appreciation is extended to Mr. Kevin Martin, president of Soil and Environmental Consultants, for his assistance in locating research sites, and to Mr. J. B. Hunt (Oak City Realty) and Mr. S. Dorsett (Dorsett and Associates) for allowing our research team to collect soil samples and conduct research on properties located in Franklin and Orange Counties, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Little River Canyon National Preserve
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Little River Canyon National Preserve GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Little River Canyon National Preserve liri_geology.pdf Version: 6/30/2020 I Little River Canyon National Preserve Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Little River Canyon National Preserve Table of Contents Geologic Reso..u..r..c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n..t.o...r.y.. .M...a..p.. .D...o..c..u..m...e...n..t............................................................................ 1 About the NPS.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c... .R..e..s..o..u...r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n...t.o..r.y.. .P...r.o..g...r.a..m............................................................... 3 GRI Digital Ma.p..s.. .a..n...d.. .S..o..u...r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C...i.t.a..t..i.o..n..s.................................................................................. 5 Index Ma..p........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Map Unit List ................................................................................................................................... 7 Map Unit Desc..r.i.p..t.i.o...n..s...................................................................................................................... 9 Qal - Allu..v..iu..m... .a..n..d.. .l.o..w... .t.e..r.r.a..c..e.. .d..e..p..o..s..i.t.s. .(..Q..u..a..t.e..r..n..a..r.y.)..................................................................................................... 9 Tal - Fluv..i.a..l. .d..e..p..o..s.i.t.s.. .(.T..e..r..t.ia..r..y.)........................................................................................................................................ 9 PNpv - P.o..t.t.s..v..i.l.le.. .F...o..r.m...a..t.i.o..n.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of TEN~Essre A,~D A~JOL~I~6 Dis~1C'rs in the U~I~ED Sra~.S of A~Ts~Tca
    Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ at Australian National University on June 23, 2016 DR. E. HULL ON THE PHYSICAL GEOLOGY OF TENN.I~SSEE, ETC. 69 7. 0~ the PHrsIeA~ GEOLOGY of TEN~ESSrE a,~d A~JOL~I~6 DIs~1c'rs in the U~I~ED SrA~.s of A~ts~tcA. By EDWARD Hur.r., M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., late Director of the Geological Survey of Ireland. (Read December 10, 1890.) CONTENTS. Part I. w 1. Introduction. w2. Physical Features. 1. The Valley of East Tennessee. 2,. Cumberland Plateau; Walden's Ridge. 3. The Sequachee Valley. 4. Rocks of the Cumberland Table-land. Part II. Development of the chief Physical Features. I. The Cumberland Plateau. 1. The Stratification. 2. :Epoch of Greatest Terrestrial Movements. 3. Direction of Greatest Vertical Movement and Erosion. 4. Forma'.,ion of the Cumberland Plateau. ix. The Gorge of the Tennessee through the Cumberland Plateau. PARr I.--w 1. ISTRODVC~IO~r. A ~rCF~T visit to the Southern States of North America induces me to lay before the Society some observations on the physical aspect of a peculiarly interesting region traversed by the Tennessee River in the State of the same name and the bordering districts. The geological structure of this district has been ably described by Professor James :M. Safford, the State Geologist *. The region is now in process of being re-surveyed topographically and geologically under the direc- tion of Major Powell, U.S. Geological Survey, to whom I am much indebted ibr kind assistance in procuring maps and informa- tion t.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of Iron Minerals in Indonesia
    THE CURRENT STATUS OF IRON MINERALS IN INDONESIA Siti Rochani, Pramusanto, Sariman and Rezky Iriansyah Anugrah R&D Centre for Mineral and Coal Technology Jalan Jenderal Sudirman 623, ph. 022-6030483, fax. 022-6003373, Bandung 40211 email : [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Received : 24 October 2007, first revision : 06 February 2008, second revision : 26 May 2008, accepted : June 2008 ABSTRACT Indonesia has great iron mineral resources, comprising primary iron ore (17 %), iron sand (8 %) and lateritic iron ore (75 %). Nowadays, Indonesia’s primary iron (hematite, magnetite) has not been em- powered yet, due to the scattered area of the resources location. Meanwhile, national iron sand is commonly used for cement industries and its potency has not supported national steel industries yet because of low iron content (45-48 %). However there is an opportunity to be processed by using Ausmelt process technology. At present, lateritic iron ore is being used as coal liquefaction catalyst in the form of limonite, but hydrometallurgy would be a promising solution to beneficiate lateritic iron ore for steel industries. Keywords: primary iron ore, iron sand, lateritic iron ore. potency, resources, reserves. zine; private and government-owned company web 1. INTRODUCTION site; and scientific handbook or literature. Based on the data collected, the next step is arranging Indonesia has great iron mineral resources, com- and analyzing the data to convey the mindset of prising primary iron ore (17 %), iron sand (8 %) Indonesia current iron minerals potency and sug- and lateritic iron ore (75 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Mass Balance of Calcrete Genesis on the Toledo Granite (Spain)
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY i\mirise ISOTOPE GEOSCIE.\'CE Chemical Geology 170 (2000) 19-35 \vww.elsevirr.coni/locate/chemgeo Chemical mass balance of calcrete genesis on the Toledo granite (Spain) Arnaud Chiquet a. * , Fabric olili b, Bruno Hamelin a, Annie Michard a, miel Nahon a UP O.!+ CEREGE. UiWR 6536. CiYRS/ UttiivrsiiG Ai.r-n-lor.veillr111, SO. 13535 Ai.r-c~ti-Pivi.eiice,cet le.^ Frotlce " CEREGE, UAIR 6336. ORSTOM/ UiiiLw.yi/8 Ai.r-Mntrri/lr 111. BI' SO. 135-35Ai.r-etr-Plvi~rricc~. Cedes 0-3, France Received 15 April 199s; acceptcd 12 Slay I999 Abstract The chernical mass balance of cnlcrete genesis is studied on a typical sequence developed in granite, in the Toledo mountains. Central Spain. Field evidence and petrographic observations indicate that the texture and the bulk volume of the parent rock are strictly preserved all along the studied cnlcrete profile. hlicroscopic observations indicate that the calcitizatinn process starts within the saprolite, superimposed on the usual nieclianisnis of granite weathering: the fresh rock is first weathered to secondary clays. mainly smectites, \vhicli are then pseudoniorphically replaced by calcite. Based on this evidence. chemical inass tiansfers are calculated. assuming ¡so-volume transformation from the parent rock to the calcrete. The mass balance results show the increasing loss of matter due to weathering of the primary phases, from the saprolite towards the calcrete layers higher in the sequence. Zr, Ti or Th, which are classically considered as immobile during weuthering, are also depleted along the profile, especially in the calcrete layer. This results from the prevailing highly alkaline conditions, which could account for the simultaneous precipitation of CaCO, and silicate dissolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Tm--12074
    ORNL/TM--12074 DE93 007798 Environmental Sciences Division STATUS REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.1 Coordinator of Report Peter J. Lemiszki 1 RaNaye B. Dreier Richard H. Ketelle 2 Richard R. Lee2 David A. Lietzke 3 William M. McMaster 4 James L. Foreman _ Suk Young Lee Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3860 1Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1410 2Energy Division, ORNL 3Route 3, Rutledge, Tennessee 37861 41400 W. Raccoon Valley Road, HeiskeU, Tennessee 37754 Date Published--October 1992 Prepared for the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (Budget Activity EW 20 10 30 1) Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6285 managed by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 _)ISTRIBUTIOi4 O;- THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED% TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 History of Geologic and Geohydrologic Work at ORNL .......................... 5 1.2 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................... 7 2. AVAILABLE DATA ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Geology, V
    THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY • • Office of Geology P. 0. Box 20307 Volume 17 Number 1 Jackson, Mississippi 39289-1307 March 1996 TOWARD A REVISION OF THE GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF MISSISSIPPI David T . D ock ery III Mississippi Office of Geology INTRODUCTION The state's Precambrian subsurface stratigraphy is from Thomas and Osborne (1987), and the Cambrian-Permsylva­ The stratigraphic columns presented here are a more nian section is modified from Dockery ( 1981) . References informative revision on the state's 1981 column published as for the Cambrian-Ordovician section of the 1981 column one sheet (Dockery, 1981). This revision wasmade forafuture include Mellen (1974, 1977); this stratigraphy is also found in text on " An Overview of Mississippi's Geology" and follows Henderson ( 1991 ). the general format and stratigraphy as pub}jshed in the Corre­ When subdivided in oil test records, the state's Ordovi­ lation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) ciansection generally contains the Knox Dolomite, the Stones charts (see Thomas and Osborne, 1987, and Dockery, 1988). River Group (see AJberstadt and Repetski, 1989), and the The following discussion is a brief background, giving the Nashville Group, while the Silurian contains the Wayne major sources used in the chart preparations. Suggestions for Group and Brownsport Formation. The Termessee Valley improvements may be directed to the author. Autl10rity's (1977) description of a 1,326-foot core hole at their proposed Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant site in northeast­ em Tishomingo Catmty greatly refined the stratigraphy be­ PALEOZOJCSTRATJGRAPffiCUNITS tween the Lower Ordovician Knox Dolomite and the Ross Formation of Devonian age.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River, Submittal of Additional Supplemental Information Related
    Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402 CNL-16-184 December 15, 2016 10 CFR 2.101 10 CFR 52.15 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Clinch River Nuclear Site NRC Project No. 785 Subject: Submittal of Additional Supplemental Information Related to Stability of Subsurface Materials and Foundation in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site References: 1. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-081, "Application for Early Site Permit for Clinch River Nuclear Site," dated May 12, 2016 2. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-134, "Schedule for Submittal of Supplemental Information in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site," dated August 11, 2016 3. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-162, “Submittal of Supplemental Information Related to Geologic Characterization Information, Surface Deformation, and Stability of Subsurface Materials and Foundation in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site,” dated October 21, 2016 4. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-170, “Submittal of Supplemental Information Related to Vibratory Ground Motion in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site,” dated October 28, 2016 By letter dated May 12, 2016 (Reference 1), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted an application for an early site permit (ESP) for the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) Site in Oak Ridge, TN. Subsequent to the submittal of the application, and consistent with interactions with NRC staff, TVA identified certain aspects of the application that it intends to supplement.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinchport Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMON\VEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGI NIA 1963 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1963 Comnorywrer,ru or VrncrNre DnpenruoNr oF PrtRcEAsEa aND Suppr,y Rrcs:uoNo 1963 DNPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DE\IELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia Menvnr M. Surnnnr,eNo, Director A. S. Recuer,, JR., Erecutiae Assistant BOARD G. Ar,vrx MessoNeuRc, Hampton, Chairman Syorvoy F. Suer,r,, Roanoke, Vice-Chairman A. Pr,rnurpr Bnrnxn, Orange WonrsrNcrox Feur,rnrn, Glasgow Cenr,rsr,n H. Huurcr,srwn, Williamsburg Genr,eNn E. Moss, Chase City Enrvpsr LnB Surrn, Grundy Vrcron W. Srpwenr, Petersburg Wrr,r,relr P. Woonr,ny. Norfolk CONTENTS Pecn Abstract. .'........ I Introduction. 2 Location and size of area. .. -..... 2 Geography. ... 6) Acknowledgments s Stratigraphy...... 3 Cambrian system o Rome formation 5 Rutledse limestone. I t0 Rogersi'ille shale. , Maryville limestone. l0 Nolichucky formation. t2 Maynardville formation. l5 Copper Ridge formation. 17 Ordovician system. 18 Chepultepec formation. l8 Longview and Kingsport formations, undivided . l9 Mascot formation. l9 Blackford formation. 21 Elway limestone oo 23 Iincolnshire limestone . Rye Cove limestone, new. 94 Rockdelllimestone. .. .. 25 Benbolt and Wardell li-estones. ,tnairrid"d 25 Bowenformation...... ad Wittenlimestone....
    [Show full text]