Ornl/Tm--12074

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ornl/Tm--12074 ORNL/TM--12074 DE93 007798 Environmental Sciences Division STATUS REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.1 Coordinator of Report Peter J. Lemiszki 1 RaNaye B. Dreier Richard H. Ketelle 2 Richard R. Lee2 David A. Lietzke 3 William M. McMaster 4 James L. Foreman _ Suk Young Lee Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3860 1Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1410 2Energy Division, ORNL 3Route 3, Rutledge, Tennessee 37861 41400 W. Raccoon Valley Road, HeiskeU, Tennessee 37754 Date Published--October 1992 Prepared for the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (Budget Activity EW 20 10 30 1) Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6285 managed by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 _)ISTRIBUTIOi4 O;- THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED% TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 History of Geologic and Geohydrologic Work at ORNL .......................... 5 1.2 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................... 7 2. AVAILABLE DATA ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Surface Geologic Data ..................................................................................... 9 2.2 Core .................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Geophysical Logs Database ......................................................................... 10 2.4 Seismic Reflection and Refraction Studies ................................................. 10 3. STRATIGRAPHY .......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 11 3.2 Rome Formation ............................................................................................ 14 3.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Previous St-udies .............................................................................. 14 3.2.3 Lithologic Description .................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Rome Formation Soils ..................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Rome Residuum .............................................................................. 16 3.3 Conasauga Group .......................................................................................... 18 3.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 18 3.3.2 General Description ....................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Pumpkin Valley Shale ................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Pumpkin Valley Shale Soil ........................................................... 23 3.3.5 Pumpkin Valley Residuum .......................................................... 24 3.3.6 Friendship Formation (Formerly Rutledge Limestone) ........... 25 3.3.7 Friendship Formation Soils .......................................................... 27 3.3.8 Rogersville Shale ............................................................................ 27 3.3.9 RogersviUe Shale Soils .................................................................. 28 3.3.10 Rogersville Residuum ................................................................... 28 3.3.11 Dismal Gap Formation (Formerly Maryville Limestone) ....... 29 3.3.12 Dismal Gap Formation Soils ........................................................ 31 3.3.13 Dismal Gap Residuum ................................................................. 32 3.3.14 Nolichucky Shale ........................................................................... 34 3.3.15 Nolichucky Shale Soils ................................................................. 38 3.3.16 Nolichucky Residuum .................................................................. 38 3.3.17 Maynardville Limestone .............................................................. 39 3.3.18 Maynardville Limestone Soils ..................................................... 40 3.3.19 Maynardville Residuum ............................................................... 41 3.4 Knox Group .................................................................................................... 41 3.4.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 41 3.4.2 General Description of Soils and Landforms ............................ 42 3.4.3 Copper Ridge Dolomite ............................................................... 45 3.4.4 Copper Ridge Soils ........................................................................ 46 3.4.5 Chepultepec Dolomite .................................................................. 47 3.4.6 Chelpultepec Soils ......................................................................... 47 3.4.7 Longview Dolomite ...................................................................... 48 3.4.8 Longview Soils ............................................................................... 48 3.4.9 Kingsport Formation .................................................................... 49 3.4.10 Kingsport Soils ................................................. .............................. 49 3.4.11 Mascot Dolomite ........................................................................... 49 3.4.12 Mascot Soils .................................................................................... 50 3.5 Chickamauga Group ..................................................................................... 51 3.5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 51 3.5.2 Bethel Valley Section ....................................................................... 51 3.5.2.1 Previous studies ................................................................ 51 3.5.2.2 Bethel Valley lithologic descriptions ............................. 54 Blackford Formation and Eidson Member of the Lincolnshire Formation ................................................. 54 Fleanor Member of the Lincolnshire Formation ............ 56 Rockdell Formation ............................................................ 56 Benbolt Formation .............................................................. 56 Bowen Formation ............................................................... 57 Witten Formation ............................................................... 57 Moccasin Formation ........................................................... 57 3.5.3 East Fork (Oak Ridge) Valley Section ........................................... 57 3.5.3.1 Previous studies ................................................................ 57 3.5.3.2 East Fork (Oak Ridge) lithologic descriptions .............. 59 Stones River Group ............................................................ 59 Pond Spring Formation ........................................... 59 Murfreesboro / Pierce Limestone ............................ 59 Ridley Limestone ...................................................... 60 Lebanon Limestone .................................................. 60 Carters Limestone .................................................... 60 Nashville Group ................................................................. 60 Hermitage Formation .............................................. 61 Cannon Limestone ................................................... 61 Catheys and Leipers Formations ........................... 61 3.5.4 Chickamauga Group Soils ............................................................. 61 3.5.5 Chickamauga Residuum ................................................................ 62 3.5.6 Chickainauga Colluvium ............................................................... 64 3.6 Reedsville Shale ............................................................................................. 65 3.7 Sequatchie Formation ................................................................................... 65 3.8 Rockwood Formation .................................................................................... 65 3.9 Reedsville Shale, Sequatchie, and Rockwood Formation Soils ............... 66 3.10 Residuum ...................................................................................................... 66 3.11 Chattanooga Shale ....................................................................................... 66 3.12 Fort Payne Formation ................................................................................. 67 3.13 Structural-lithic Unit Designations ........................................................... 68 4 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION SOIL SURVEY ................................... 69 4.1 Previous Investigations ................................................................................ 69 4.2 Surficial
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Cross Section
    Geologic Cross Section I–I′ Through the Appalachian Basin from the Eastern Margin of the Illinois Basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Scott County, Virginia By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, and Christopher S. Swezey Pamphlet B to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3343 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copy- righted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Swezey, C.S., 2015, Geologic cross section I–I′ through the Appalachian basin from the eastern margin of the Illinois basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge province, Scott County, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3343, 2 sheets and pamphlet A, 41 p.; pamphlet B, 102 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3343.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinchport Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMON\VEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGI NIA 1963 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1963 Comnorywrer,ru or VrncrNre DnpenruoNr oF PrtRcEAsEa aND Suppr,y Rrcs:uoNo 1963 DNPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DE\IELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia Menvnr M. Surnnnr,eNo, Director A. S. Recuer,, JR., Erecutiae Assistant BOARD G. Ar,vrx MessoNeuRc, Hampton, Chairman Syorvoy F. Suer,r,, Roanoke, Vice-Chairman A. Pr,rnurpr Bnrnxn, Orange WonrsrNcrox Feur,rnrn, Glasgow Cenr,rsr,n H. Huurcr,srwn, Williamsburg Genr,eNn E. Moss, Chase City Enrvpsr LnB Surrn, Grundy Vrcron W. Srpwenr, Petersburg Wrr,r,relr P. Woonr,ny. Norfolk CONTENTS Pecn Abstract. .'........ I Introduction. 2 Location and size of area. .. -..... 2 Geography. ... 6) Acknowledgments s Stratigraphy...... 3 Cambrian system o Rome formation 5 Rutledse limestone. I t0 Rogersi'ille shale. , Maryville limestone. l0 Nolichucky formation. t2 Maynardville formation. l5 Copper Ridge formation. 17 Ordovician system. 18 Chepultepec formation. l8 Longview and Kingsport formations, undivided . l9 Mascot formation. l9 Blackford formation. 21 Elway limestone oo 23 Iincolnshire limestone . Rye Cove limestone, new. 94 Rockdelllimestone. .. .. 25 Benbolt and Wardell li-estones. ,tnairrid"d 25 Bowenformation...... ad Wittenlimestone....
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Thin-Skinned Style of Deformation in the Southern Appalachians, and Potential Hydrocarbon Traps
    Characteristics of Thin-Skinned Style of Deformation in the Southern Appalachians, and Potential Hydrocarbon Traps GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1O18 Characteristics of Thin-Skinned Style of Deformation in the Southern Appalachians, and Potential Hydrocarbon Traps By LEONARD D. HARRIS and ROBERT C. MILICI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1018 Description of and field guide to large- and small-scale features of thin-skinned tectonics in the southern Appalachians, and a discussion of hydrocarbon production and potential UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director First printing 1977 Second printing 1981 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Harris, Leonard D. Characteristics of thin-skinned style of deformation in the southern Appalachians, and potential hydrocarbon traps. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1018) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1018 1. Rock deformation. 2. Geology Appalachian Mountains. 3. Petroleum -Geology Appalachian Mountains. I. Milici, Robert C., 1931- joint author. II. Title: Characteristics of thin-skinned style of deformation in the southern Appalachians . III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1018. QE604.H37 551.8'7'09768 76-608283 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Abstract ———_—___________________________——_———————————
    [Show full text]
  • Conodonts from El Paso Group
    Contents ABSTRACT 5 GENUS DREPANOISTODUS 25 D. suberectus, subsp. A, n. subsp. 25 INTRODUCTION 5 GENUS HISTIODELLA 25 OBJECTIVES 5 H. donnae, n. sp. 25 PROCEDURES 5 GENUS JUANOGNATHUS 26 FIGURED SPECIMENS 6 J. hayesi, n. sp. 26 COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY 6 J. jaanussoni 26 PREVIOUS WORK 7 J. variabilis 27 FAUNAL EVALUATION 8 CORRELATION 9 J.? n. sp. 1 27 GENUS LOXODUS 27 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY 10 L. bransoni s.f. 27 GENUS ACANTHODUS 10 GENUS MACERODUS 28 A. lineatus s.f. 10 dianae 28 A. uncinatus s.f. 10 GENUS MICROZARKODINA 28 A. sp. s.f. 10 M. ? cf. M. marathonensis 28 GENUS ACODUS 10 GENUS OELANDODUS 29 A. delicatus 10 O.cf. O.costatus 29 A. deltatus deltatus 12 O.cf. O.elongatus 29 A. oneotensis s.f. 12 GENUS OEPIKODUS 30 A.? russoi 13 O. communis 30 A. triangularis 13 O.? n. sp. 31 GENUS A. sp. A s.f. 14 OISTODUS 31 A. sp. indet. 14 O. forceps s.f. 31 GENUS ACONTIODUS 14 O. gracilis s.f. 32 A. iowensis s.f. 14 A. propinquus s.f. 14 O.cf. 0. inaequalis s.f. 32 O. n. sp. 32 A. aff. A. propinquus s.f. 14 A. staufferi s.f. 15 O. cf. 0. lanceolatus 33 GENUS CLAVOHAMULUS 15 O. ? lecheguillensis, n. sp. 33 C. densus s.f. 15 O. mehli s.f. 33 C. lemonei, n. sp. 15 O. cf. O. multicorrugatus 35 C. n. sp. A 16 O. cf. O. parallelus s.f. 35 O. cf. O. pseudoramis s.f. 35 GENUS CORDYLODUS 16 O.
    [Show full text]
  • WV Generalized Stratigraphic Column/Chart
    Generalized Stratigraphic Chart for West Virginia Series/ Drillers’ Era System Stage Western WV Eastern WV Terminology CENOZOIC Paleogene Eocene Igneous Intrusives MESOZOIC Jurassic Igneous Intrusives PERMIAN Dunkard Group Carroll, Minshall, Murphy, Moundsville, Upper Monongahela Fm. 1st Cow Run, Little Conemaugh Group Dunkard, Big Dunkard Burning Springs, Middle Allegheny Fm. 2nd Cow Run, Kanawha Fm. Gas Sands, Horseneck (Subsystem) New River Fm. Pottsville PENNSYLVANIAN Lower Pocahontas Fm. Group Salt Sands Bluestone Fm. Pride, Ravencliff, Avis, Princeton Ss. Mauch Chunk Maxton, Little Lime, Upper Hinton Fm. Group Pencil Cave, Blue Monday Bluefield Fm. CARBONIFEROUS Greenbrier Group Big Lime, Keener, Middle Big Injun (Subsystem) Maccrady Fm. (south) MISSISSIPPIAN Lower Big Injun, Squaw, Sunbury Sh. Price Fm. Weir, Coffee (Sunbury) Sh. Berea Ss. Cleveland Sh. Gantz, 50’, 30’, Ohio Sh. Chagrin Sh. Hampshire Group Huron Sh. Gordon Stray, Gordon, Hanover Sh. bed 4th, 5th, Bayard, Java Fm. Pipe Creek Sh. bed Greenland Foreknobs Fm. Elizabeth, Warren, Upper West Falls Fm. Angola Sh. Gap Group Scherr Fm. Speechley, Balltown, Rhinestreet Sh. Bradford, Riley, Cashaqua Sh. Sonyea Fm. Middlesex Sh. Benson, Alexander, Elk, Haverty, Genesee Fm./ West River Sh. Brallier Fm. Geneseo Sh./Burket Sh. Fox, Sycamore Harrell Sh. Harrell Sh. DEVONIAN Tully Ls. Millboro Sh. Hamilton Group Mahantango Fm. Mahantango Fm. Marcellus Sh. Marcellus Sh. Middle Tioga ash beds Tioga ash beds Huntersville Chert Needmore Sh. Onondaga Ls. Oriskany Ss. “Corniferous” Lower (west only) Helderberg Group Bass Islands Fm. Big Mountain Sh. Clifton Forge Ss. Keyser Fm. PALEOZOIC Lower Keyser Mbr. PHANEROZOIC Salina Fm. Tonoloway Fm. Newburg Wills Creek Fm. Upper Bloomsburg Williamsport Fm. Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955
    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955 ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A Names of North America Introduced in 1936-1955 By DRUID WILSON, WILLIAM J. SANDO? and RUDOLPH W. KOPF Prepared with the assistance of BARBARA BEDETTE, JEAN L. EGGLETON, GRACE C. KEROHER, CAROLYN MANN, WILLIAM G. MELTON, JR., KATHERINE DENNISON PALMER, and JACK E. SMEDLEY GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA -G E O L O G I C AL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A A compilation of new geologic names of North America, including Greenland, the finest Indies, the Pacific Island pos­ sessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director ' For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1. (paper cover) FOEEWOBD The "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States" by M. Grace Wilmarth, published in 1938 and reprinted in 1951 and 1957, met a long standing need and continuing demand for a compilation of geologic names. Plans made for future compilations as new names and revisions appeared were interrupted during the years of World War II. In 1952 a sustained effort was begun toward review of geo­ logic publications necessary to furnish a background for preparation of a new edition. After the review was brought up to date in 1956, the present compilation was prepared in order to furnish to the geo­ logic profession, as quickly as possible, some of the essential data concerning the new names that have appeared since 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fishes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fishes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fishes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fishes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae. Keywords. Nomenclature, ICZN, Vertebrata, Agnatha, Gnathostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodynamic Synthesis of the North Queensland Region and Implications for Metallogeny
    GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Geodynamic Synthesis of the North Queensland Region and Implications for Metallogeny Natalie Kositcin, David C. Champion and David L. Huston Record 2009/30 GeoCat # 69159 APPLYING GEOSCIENCE TO AUSTRALIA’S MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES Geodynamic Synthesis of the North Queensland Region and Implications for Metallogeny GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA RECORD 2009/30 by N. Kositcin1, D. C. Champion1 and D.L. Huston1 1. Onshore Energy and Minerals Division, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism Minister for Resources and Energy: The Hon. Martin Ferguson, AM MP Secretary: John Pierce Geoscience Australia Chief Executive Officer: Dr Neil Williams PSM © Commonwealth of Australia, 2009 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Of ficer, Geos cience Australia, GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not solely rely on this information when making a commercial decision. ISSN 1448-2177 ISBN 978-1-921672-21-7 web ISBN 978-1-921672-22-4 print GeoCat # 69159 Bibliographic refer ence: Kositcin, N., Champion, D.C. and Huston, D.L. 2009. Geodynamic Synthesis of the North Queensland Region and Implications for Metallogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Radford North Geomap
    Virginia Open File Report 09-01 Department of Geologic Map of the Radford North Quadrangle Mines, Minerals and Energy Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE RADFORD NORTH QUADRANGLE, VIRGINIA DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS (PEARISBURG) Geology by Arthur P. Schultz and Mervin J. Bartholomew 2009 QUATERNARY ORDOVICIAN (NEWPORT) 80° 37’ 30’’ (EGGLESTON) A 80° 30’ Modified land: Man-made alterations including mine dumps. Juniata Formation: Predominantly interbedded maroon to dark reddish-brown, mottled 37° 15’ 37° 15’ ml Oj siltstone and mudstone with thin beds of fine-grained reddish-brown sandstone. Fossil Alluvium: Unconsolidated light-gray to light-brown sand, silt, clay, with channels and Lingula fragments and reduction spots are locally common. The thickness is about 150 feet à à Qal lenses of pebbles, cobbles, and boulders of quartzite, sandstone, and chert. Deposits are (45 m). à stratified and often crossbedded and/or graded bedded. Thicknesses from less than 1 to ÆÆ more than 30 feet (0.3 to 9 m). Martinsburg Formation: Upper portion consists of interbedded 0.5- to 1.0-foot (15 to 30 Omb cm) thick beds of massive, fine-grained, medium-gray sandstone with fossil debris and Æ Sinkholes: Areas mapped as sinkhole topography consist of rolling low hills with round to medium-gray well-laminated calcareous mudstone. This grades down section into irregularly shaped sinkholes, clusters of sinkholes, or cave openings. These features have dominantly medium- to dark-gray, coarse-grained, bioclastic limestone interbedded with formed from solution or collapse of carbonate bedrock. Sinkholes are delineated from medium-gray, well laminated calcareous mudstone.
    [Show full text]
  • B-57 Geology and Mineral Resources of the Dalton Quadrangle, Georgia-Tennessee
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bulletin Number 57 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE DALTON QUADRANGLE, GEORGIA-TENNESSEE By Arthur C. Munyan ATLANTA 1951 Looking east toward the Cohutta Mountain front. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Department of Mines, Mining and Geology Atlanta, July 16, 1951 To His Excellency, Herman Talmadge, Governor Commissioner Ex-Officio, State Division of Conservation Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin No. 57, "Geology and Mineral Resources of the Dalton, Quadrangle, Georgia-Tennessee." This investi­ gation was undertaken by Arthur C. Munyan as a dissertation problem for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Univer­ sity of Cincinnati. It is desired to point out that this report r ~presents one example among many of cooperation between the Georgia Geological Survey and the universities. The productivity of our small permanent staff is appreciably expanded by sponsoring geologic research projects of this type, conducted by outstanding graduate students. This bulletin, prepared at little expense to the State, is a detailed report upon a part of the Paleozoic area of North­ west Georgia, and reviews the stratigraphic, structural and economic geology of that part of the State. Particular refer­ ence is made to the mineral resources of the area which include barite, clay, limestones and dolomites, manganese and iron, and tripoli. It is believed that this report will have transfer value
    [Show full text]