The Chordates: Putting a Backbone Into Spineless Animals Note: These Links Do Not Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Chordates: Putting a Backbone Into Spineless Animals Note: These Links Do Not Work The Chordates: Putting a Backbone Into Spineless Animals Note: These links do not work. Use the links within the outline to access the images in the popup windows. This text is the same as the scrolling text in the popup windows. I. What is a chordate animal? (Page 1) Phylum Chordata: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/phylum_chordata.html The chordate animals form the second major group of the deuterostome line. In this topic you will learn about the invertebrate chordates and receive a brief introduction to the vertebrates. Characteristics: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/characteristics.html This diagram of a generalized chordate animal illustrates the four chordate characteristics. These are the notochord, dorsal, hollow nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and a post-anal tail. Note that the nerve cord is expanded to form a brain at the anterior end of the animal, and that the pharynx is the first part of the digestive tract. The tail is defined as “post anal” because it extends beyond the anus. Notochord: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/notochord.html The notochord is a skeletal structure located above the gut. It is stiff enough to provide support for the body, yet flexible enough to bend. The notochord is composed of large, fluid-filled cells that bulge due to internal water pressure. They are held in place by two sheaths of tissue. Thus, the stiffness of the notochord results from hydrostatic pressure, not from the presence of hard minerals as are found in shells or bone. During Development: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/during_development.html You have recently learned the basics of early development in deuterostome embryos. The process of gastrulation is shown in this diagram. The region colored green is the developing notochord. It begins to form during gastrulation and is in place on the dorsal side of the embryo by the end of the gastrulation process. Note that at this point, before a coelom has formed, the notochord is within the roof of the developing gut. It will detach from the gut tube during coelom formation. Swimming Motions: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/swimming_motions.html The function of the notochord is to stiffen the body as the animal swims. Muscles along the sides of the body contract alternately on right and left sides, resulting in a sinuous body motion. Forward locomotion is much faster and more efficient than it would be in a flabby body, lacking a notochord. The ability to swim efficiently is probably one reason for the notable success of Chordate animals as early as the Cambrian period. Nerve Cord: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/nerve_cord.html In this cross section through the body of a simple, chordate animal, the location of the notochord and nerve cord are clearly visible. The nerve cord lies just above the notochord on the dorsal side of the body. Annelids and Arthropods: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/annelids_and_arthropods.html These illustrations should serve as a reminder that the nerve cords of annelids and arthropods are located along the ventral side of the body. Also, these nerve cords are solid, whereas the nerve cord of chordate animals has a hollow center. Water Flow: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/water_flow.html This diagram illustrates water flow through the pharynx of a simple chordate animal. Water enters through the mouth and exits from slits within both sides of the pharynx. Without slits, water would continue through the digestive tract and emerge from the anus. II. What are the different kinds of chordates? (Page 2-4) Phylum Chordata: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_bigimages/phylum_chordata.html This chart is very helpful in reviewing how the deuterostome line fits into the large division of bilaterally symmetrical animals. It also illustrates the relationship between the echinoderms and chordates. Phylum Chordata contains all of the groups beneath the “Chordates” heading. The urochordates and cephalochordates are two subphyla of chordate animals. The vertebrates are the third subphylum, consisting of the jawless lampreys and the jawed vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals). We will return to this chart later to clarify the important changes that occurred during vertebrate evolution. Tunicate Larvae: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/tunicate_larvae.html Here we see a living tunicate larva and a diagram that illustrates the major chordate characteristics. Note that the notochord stiffens the tail, but does not extend into the head region. Water flows into the pharynx through the mouth, then exits through slits into an excurrent siphon that expels water from the body. Metamorphosis: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/metamorphosis.html Most tunicates are sessile as adults. When ready to change to the adult body form, the free-swimming larval stage attaches to a solid object by means of adhesive glands at the tip of its head. During metamorphosis, the notochord degenerates and the nerve cord is reduced to a few small ganglia. At the same time, the pharynx grows until it occupies most of the body cavity. The soft body is supported by a thick covering called a tunic, from which the animal’s common name is derived. The structure of the tunic is unusual in that it contains cellulose, a substance found in plant cell walls, but rarely in animal tissues. Pharynx: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/pharynx.html The large pharynx ,with its many small slits, fills most of the space within the tunicate’s body as can be seen in the specimen on the left. Water flowing through the pharynx carries tiny food particles into the pharyngeal cavity. Water then passes through the pharyngeal slits and exits via an excurrent siphon. Food particles are too large to pass through to slits, so are trapped within the pharynx and pass through the gut where digestion and absorption occur. Undigested particles are expelled through the anus into the excurrent siphon and leave the body in the outgoing water current. Thus the pharynx of tunicates provides a sophisticated method of filter-feeding. Sea Squirts: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/sea_squirts.html Most species of tunicates are sea squirts. These, small sac-like animals are common in coastal waters and often wash up on the beach. The two siphons (for water inflow and outflow) are clearly visible in this sea squirt. If you were to pick up the animal, its body would strongly contract, squirting sea water from both siphons. Hence the name sea squirt. Soft-bodied Animals: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/soft- bodied_animals.html These sea squirts appear fragile and defenseless, but few predators eat them. Presumably they contain foul-tasting chemicals and some species are poisonous. In fact, it is said that the wife of Julius Caesar eliminated some of his enemies by feeding them poisonous sea squirts! Hermaphroditic: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/hermaphroditic.html This diagram shows the location of gonads within the sea squirt’s body. Both eggs and sperm are shed from long tubes that enter the excurrent siphon. Although sea squirts are hermaphroditic, eggs are usually fertilized by sperm from another individual that is spawning nearby. Colonies of Sea Squirts: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/colonies.html Many species of sea squirt form colonies. Here are several examples. Excurrent Siphon: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/excurrent_siphon.html In this sea squirt colony, the individual bodies are arranged around a central excurrent siphon that is shared by all of the sea squirts (seven in this colony). Each sea squirt retains its incurrent siphon, which serves as a mouth to bring water into the pharynx. Nuisance: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/nuisance.html These colonial sea squirts have created a massive growth on an underwater rope. Salps: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/salps.html This salp was photographed in Monterey Bay. It is one of the larger species, reaching a length of 30 cm. Like the sea squirts, it filter-feeds by pumping water through a large pharynx. Salp populations are quite dense in some parts of the ocean. The fecal pellets that they produce are rich in the nutrients needed by marine algae. Thus, salps play an important role in the marine ecosystem. Transparent Body: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/transparent_body.html The body wall of salps is composed of a clear, gelatinous material similar to that of jellyfish. Thus the body is transparent, which may provide the salp’s main line of defense. The dark structure seen within this salp is the gonad. Chain-like Colonies: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/chain- like.html Many salps form colonies. In some species the chain of salps can reach a length of 20 meters. The salps, in conjunction with other gelatinous animals such as jellyfish, siphonophores and comb jellies, form what is called a “jelly web” in deeper ocean waters. The significance of this web of life in the ecology of oceans has only recently been recognized and is not yet well understood. Larvaceans: http://courses.ncsu.edu/zo495x/common/zo155_site/wrap/chordates/chordate_popups/larvaceans.html These small tunicates are literally larvae that lost the ability to undergo metamorphosis.
Recommended publications
  • An Observation of Two Oceanic Salp Swarms in the Tasman Sea: Thetys Vagina and Cyclosalpa Affinis Natasha Henschke1,2,3*, Jason D
    Henschke et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2016) 9:21 DOI 10.1186/s41200-016-0023-8 MARINE RECORD Open Access An observation of two oceanic salp swarms in the Tasman Sea: Thetys vagina and Cyclosalpa affinis Natasha Henschke1,2,3*, Jason D. Everett1,2,3 and Iain M. Suthers1,2,3 Abstract Background: Large oceanic salps are rarely encountered. The highest recorded biomasses of the salps Thetys vagina (852 g WW m−3)andCyclosalpa affinis (1149 g WW m−3) were observed in the Tasman Sea during January 2009. Results: Due to their fast sinking rates the carcasses and faecal pellets of these and other large salps play a significant role in carbon transport to the seafloor. We calculated that faecal pellets from these swarms could have contributed up to 67 % of the mean organic daily carbon flux in the area. This suggests that the flux of carbon from salp swarms are not accurately captured in current estimates. Conclusion: This study contributes information on salp abundance and biomass to a relatively understudied field, improving estimates for biogeochemical cycles. Background (Henschke et al., 2013) can increase the carbon flux in an The role of gelatinous zooplankton, such as salps, pyro- area up to ten-fold the daily average (Fischer et al., 1988) somes and cnidarians, in ocean food webs and biogeo- for a sustained period of time (Smith et al. 2014). chemical cycling has garnered increased attention in Due to their regular occurrence (Henschke et al., recent years (Lebrato et al., 2011; Henschke et al., 2013; 2014) and coastal dominance (Henschke et al 2011), Lebrato et al., 2013; Smith et al.
    [Show full text]
  • "Lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa
    Deuterostomes Bryozoa Phoronida "lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa Stelleroidea Asteroidea Ophiuroidea Echinozoa Holothuroidea Echinoidea Crinozoa Crinoidea Chaetognatha (arrow worms) Hemichordata (acorn worms) Chordata Urochordata (sea squirt) Cephalochordata (amphioxoius) Vertebrata PHYLUM CHAETOGNATHA (70 spp) Arrow worms Fossils from the Cambrium Carnivorous - link between small phytoplankton and larger zooplankton (1-15 cm long) Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord Peculiar origin for mesoderm (not strictly enterocoelous) Uncertain relationship with echinoderms PHYLUM HEMICHORDATA (120 spp) Acorn worms Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord (Stomochord cartilaginous and once thought homologous w/notochord) Tornaria larvae very similar to asteroidea Bipinnaria larvae CLASS ENTEROPNEUSTA (acorn worms) Marine, bottom dwellers CLASS PTEROBRANCHIA Colonial, sessile, filter feeding, tube dwellers Small (1-2 mm), "U" shaped gut, no gill slits PHYLUM CHORDATA Body segmented Axial notochord Dorsal hollow nerve chord Paired gill slits Post anal tail SUBPHYLUM UROCHORDATA Marine, sessile Body covered in a cellulose tunic ("Tunicates") Filter feeder (» 200 L/day) - perforated pharnx adapted for filtering & repiration Pharyngeal basket contractable - squirts water when exposed at low tide Hermaphrodites Tadpole larvae w/chordate characteristics (neoteny) CLASS ASCIDIACEA (sea squirt/tunicate - sessile) No excretory system Open circulatory system (can reverse blood flow) Endostyle - (homologous to thyroid of vertebrates) ciliated groove
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Selection on a Chordate Histocompatibility Locus
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01787.x EVIDENCE FOR SELECTION ON A CHORDATE HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS Marie L. Nydam,1,2,3 Alyssa A. Taylor,3 and Anthony W. De Tomaso3 1Division of Science and Mathematics, Centre College, Danville, Kentucky 40422 2E-mail: marie.nydam@centre.edu 3Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 Received June 7, 2011 Accepted July 31, 2012 Allorecognition is the ability of an organism to differentiate self or close relatives from unrelated individuals. The best known applications of allorecognition are the prevention of inbreeding in hermaphroditic species (e.g., the self-incompatibility [SI] systems in plants), the vertebrate immune response to foreign antigens mediated by MHC loci, and somatic fusion, where two genetically independent individuals physically join to become a chimera. In the few model systems where the loci governing allorecognition outcomes have been identified, the corresponding proteins have exhibited exceptional polymorphism. But information about the evolution of this polymorphism outside MHC is limited. We address this subject in the ascidian Botryllus schlosseri,where allorecognition outcomes are determined by a single locus, called FuHC (Fusion/HistoCompatibility). Molecular variation in FuHC is distributed almost entirely within populations, with very little evidence for differentiation among different populations. Mutation plays a larger role than recombination in the creation of FuHC polymorphism. A selection statistic, neutrality tests, and distribution of variation within and among different populations all provide evidence for selection acting on FuHC, but are not in agreement as to whether the selection is balancing or directional.
    [Show full text]
  • Brains of Primitive Chordates 439
    Brains of Primitive Chordates 439 Brains of Primitive Chordates J C Glover, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway although providing a more direct link to the evolu- B Fritzsch, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA tionary clock, is nevertheless hampered by differing ã 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. rates of evolution, both among species and among genes, and a still largely deficient fossil record. Until recently, it was widely accepted, both on morpholog- ical and molecular grounds, that cephalochordates Introduction and craniates were sister taxons, with urochordates Craniates (which include the sister taxa vertebrata being more distant craniate relatives and with hemi- and hyperotreti, or hagfishes) represent the most chordates being more closely related to echinoderms complex organisms in the chordate phylum, particu- (Figure 1(a)). The molecular data only weakly sup- larly with respect to the organization and function of ported a coherent chordate taxon, however, indicat- the central nervous system. How brain complexity ing that apparent morphological similarities among has arisen during evolution is one of the most chordates are imposed on deep divisions among the fascinating questions facing modern science, and it extant deuterostome taxa. Recent analysis of a sub- speaks directly to the more philosophical question stantially larger number of genes has reversed the of what makes us human. Considerable interest has positions of cephalochordates and urochordates, pro- therefore been directed toward understanding the moting the latter to the most closely related craniate genetic and developmental underpinnings of nervous relatives (Figure 1(b)). system organization in our more ‘primitive’ chordate relatives, in the search for the origins of the vertebrate Comparative Appearance of Brains, brain in a common chordate ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Salp Contributions to Vertical Carbon Flux in the Sargasso Sea
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by College of William & Mary: W&M Publish W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 2016 Salp contributions to vertical carbon flux in the Sargasso Sea JP Stone Virginia Institute of Marine Science Deborah K. Steinberg Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Stone, JP and Steinberg, Deborah K., "Salp contributions to vertical carbon flux in the Sargasso Sea" (2016). VIMS Articles. 797. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/797 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact scholarworks@wm.edu. 1 Salp contributions to vertical carbon flux in the Sargasso 2 Sea 3 4 5 Joshua P. Stonea,*, Deborah K. Steinberga 6 a Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, 7 PO Box 1346, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, USA 8 * Corresponding author. 9 E-mail addresses: jpstone@vims.edu (J. Stone), debbies@vims.edu (D. Steinberg) 10 11 1 © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the Elsevier user license http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ 12 Abstract 13 We developed a one-dimensional model to estimate salp contributions to vertical carbon flux at the 14 Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) site in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre for a 17-yr period 15 (April 1994 to December 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (= Amphioxus) Branchiostoma Floridae
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 130: 71-84,1996 Published January 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Larval settlement, post-settlement growth and secondary production of the Florida lancelet (= amphioxus) Branchiostoma floridae M. D. Stokes* Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093-0202, USA ABSTRACT A population of Branch~ostomaflondae in Tampa Bay, Flonda, USA was sieved from the substratum frequently (often daily) from June 1992 through September 1994 Body lengths were mea- sured for 54264 luvenlle and adult lancelets The breedlng season lasted each year from early May through early September and newly metamorphosed lancelets settled as luveniles from late May through mid October, dunng this period of the year dlstinct settlements occurred approxmately every 1 to 3 wk Post-settlement growth was followed as changes in modal length on size-frequency histo- grams Changes in cohort growth over this peliod were compared to several different simple and seasonally oscillating growth models The von Bertalanffy functlon in smple and oscillating forms provided the best estmates of lancelet growth The lancelets grew in summer (almost 0 5 mm d-' in recently settled luveniles), but growth slowed and almost ceased durlng wlnter B flondae can llve at least 2 yr and can reach a maxlmum length of 58 mm The maximal secondary productlon was 61 53 g m-' yrrl (ash-free dry welght) and the productlon to biomass ratio was 11 64 Population den- sities at the study site ranged from about 100 to 1200 lancelets m ' KEY WORDS: Lancelet . Amphioxus . Branchiostorna flondae . Growth . Production . Breeding season .
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Understanding of Salp Swarm Dynamics. ICES CM 2002/N
    CM 2002/ N:12 Towards an understanding of salp swarm dynamics by Patricia Kremer ABSTRACT Species of salps are characterized by intermittent blooms. Several studies have documented the importance of physical processes both in providing seed stocks of salps and creating an environment that is favorable for the rapid increase of salp populations. Although salps are typically oceanic, most observations of bloom dynamics have been made in more accessible inshore waters, so it is difficult to assess how frequent and widespread these swarms are. A review and comparison of existing data is helping to define geographic “hot spots” for salp blooms as well as the necessary physical and biological precursors. Although at this point, the review is far from complete, several generalities are emerging. The details of the physical forcing functions vary, but the overall physical regime seems to require a region of pulsed mixing of oceanic water that results in a relatively high standing stock of autotrophs. For a salp bloom to occur, there also needs to be an adequate seed population of salps and sufficient sustained primary production to support the biomass of the salp population as the bloom develops. As non-selective filter feeders, salps are able to remove a wide range of particulates from the water column, transforming the undigested portion into fast sinking feces. Therefore, when salps occur at high densities, the water is characterized by low abundance of other plankton, with obvious trophic implications. Patricia Kremer: Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton CT 06340-6097, USA [tel: +1 860 405 9140; fax: +1 860 405 9153; e-mail pkremer@uconn.edu] INTRODUCTION Salps are holoplanktonic grazers that have a life history, feeding biology, and population dynamics that contrasts sharply to copepods and other crustacean zooplankton (Madin and Deibel 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Introduction
    Marine and Freshwater Miscellanea III KEY TRAITS OF AMPHIOXUS SPECIES (CEPHALOCHORDATA) AND THE GOLT1 Daniel Pauly and Elaine Chu Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C, Canada Email: d.pauly@oceans.ubc.ca Abstract Major biological traits of amphioxus species (Cephalochordata) are presented with emphasis on the size reached by their 32 valid species in the genera Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (25 spp.), and Epigonichthys (5 spp.) and on related features, i.e., growth parameters and size at first maturity. Overall, these traits combined with features of their respiration, suggest that the cephalochordates conform to the Gill Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT), which relates the growth performance of water-breathing ectotherms to the surface area of their respiratory organ(s). Introduction The small fish-like animals know as ‘lancelet‘ or ‘amphioxius’ belong the subphylum Cephalochordata, which is either a sister group, or related to the ancestor of the vertebrate animals (see Garcia-Fernàndez and Benito-Gutierrez 2008). The cephalochordates consist of 3 families (the Asymmetronidae, Epigonichthyidae and Branchiostomidae), with one genus each, Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (24 spp.) and Epigonichthys (6 spp.), as detailed in Table 1 and SeaLifeBase (www.sealifebase.org). This contribution is to assemble some of the basic biological traits of lancelets (Figure 1), notably the maximum size each of their 34 species can reach, which is easily their most important attribute, though it is often ignored (Haldane 1926). Finally, reported lengths at first maturity of cephalochordates were related to the corresponding, population-specific maximum length, to test whether these animals mature as predicted by the Gill- Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT; see Pauly 2021a, 2021b).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Annelid Axochord: Insights Into Notochord Evolution Antonella Lauri Et Al
    RESEARCH | REPORTS ORIGIN OF NOTOCHORD by double WMISH (Fig. 2, F to L). Although none of the genes were exclusively expressed in the annelid mesodermal midline, their combined Development of the annelid coexpression was unique to these cells (implying that mesodermal midline in annelids and chor- damesoderm in vertebrates are more similar to axochord: Insights into each other than to any other tissue). It is unlikely that the molecular similarity between annelid notochord evolution and vertebrate mesodermal midline is due to in- dependent co-option of a conserved gene cas- Antonella Lauri,1*† Thibaut Brunet,1* Mette Handberg-Thorsager,1,2‡ sette, because this would require either that this Antje H.L. Fischer,1§ Oleg Simakov,1 Patrick R. H. Steinmetz,1‖ Raju Tomer,1,2¶ cassette was active elsewhere in the body (which Philipp J. Keller,2 Detlev Arendt1,3# is not the case) or that multiple identical inde- pendent events of co-option occurred (which is The origin of chordates has been debated for more than a century, with one key issue being unparsimonious). As in vertebrates, the meso- the emergence of the notochord. In vertebrates, the notochord develops by convergence dermal midline resembles the neuroectodermal and extension of the chordamesoderm, a population of midline cells of unique molecular midline, which expresses foxD, foxA, netrin, slit, identity. We identify a population of mesodermal cells in a developing invertebrate, the marine and noggin (figs. S6 and S7) but not brachyury or annelid Platynereis dumerilii, that converges and extends toward the midline and expresses a twist. However, unlike in chicken (10), the an- notochord-specific combination of genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass of Zooplankton and Micronekton in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishing Grounds Off Eastern Tasmania, Australia
    -- MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 138: 1-14, 1996 Published July 25 , Mar Ecol Prog Ser Biomass of zooplankton and micronekton in the southern bluefin tuna fishing grounds off eastern Tasmania, Australia J. W. Young*, R. W. Bradford, T. D. Lamb, V. D. Lyne CSIRO Marine Laboratories, Division of Fisheries. GPO Box 1538. Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia ABSTRACT: The southern bluefin tuna (SBT) supports a seasonal fishery off the east coast of Tasmania, Australia. The distribution of zooplankton biomass in this region was examined as a means of finding out why the SBT are attracted to this area. We examined whether there was a particular area or depth stratum that supported significantly greater amounts of potential feed, directly or indirectly, for SBT Samples of zooplankton and micronekton were collected during the winter SBT fishery seasons in 1992-94. Five net types (mouth opening 0 25 to -80 m') w~thcodend mesh sizes ranging from 100 to 1000 pm were used. Samples were collected from 4 main hydrographic areas: warm East Australian Current water, cool subantarctic water, the front separating them (the subtrop~calconvergence), and the adjacent shelf. Four depth strata (50, 150, 250 and 350 m) were also sampled. In contrast to our expectations, the biomass in the subtropical convergence was no greater than that in the 3 other areas. Rather, it was the shelf, albeit with some inconsistencies, that generally had the greatest biomass of both zooplankton and micronekton. Offshore, there was no s~gnificantdifference in the biomass of the depth strata sampled, although the biomass of gelatinous zooplankton in the surface waters increased during the study period.
    [Show full text]