DOCSLIB.ORG

Sponges Cnidarians Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Ediacaran Arthropods 635 Cambrian PALEOZOIC PROTEROZOIC 605 Time (Mil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sponges Cnidarians Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Ediacaran Arthropods 635 Cambrian PALEOZOIC PROTEROZOIC 605 Time (Mil © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Sponges Cnidarians Echinoderms Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Arthropods PROTEROZOIC PALEOZOIC Ediacaran Cambrian 635 605 575 545 515 485 0 Time (millions of years age) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 Food particles in mucus Choanocyte Collar Flagellum Choanocyte Phagocytosis of Amoebocyte food particles Pores Spicules Water flow Amoebocytes Azure vase sponge (Callyspongia plicifera) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 (a) Hydrozoa (b) Scyphozoa (c) Anthozoa © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 15 µm 75 µm (a) Valeria (800 mya): (b) Spiny acritarch roughly spherical, no (575 mya): about five structural defenses, times larger than soft-bodied Valeria and covered in hard spines © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 5 (a) Radial symmetry (b) Bilateral symmetry © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 6 Body cavity Body covering (from ectoderm) Tissue layer lining body cavity and suspending Digestive tract internal organs (from endoderm) (from mesoderm) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 7 Porifera Metazoa Ctenophora ANCESTRAL Eumetazoa PROTIST Cnidaria Deuterostomia Hemichordata 770 million Echinodermata years ago 680 million Chordata years ago Lophotrochozoa Lophotrochozoa Platyhelminthes Bilateria Rotifera Ectoprocta Brachiopoda 670 million years ago Mollusca Ecdysozoa Annelida Nematoda Arthropoda © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 8 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 9 Notochord Dorsal, hollow nerve cord Muscle segments Mouth Anus Post-anal tail Pharyngeal slits or clefts © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 10 (a) Lancelet (b) Tunicate © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 11 Common ancestor of Myxini Vertebrates vertebrates (hagfishes) Petromyzontida (lampreys) Vertebral Chondrichthyes Gnathostomes column (sharks, rays, chimaeras) Actinopterygii Osteichthyans Jaws, (ray-finned fishes) Myxini mineralized skeleton Actinistia Lobe-fins Dipnoi Lungs (coelacanths) or lung derivatives Dipnoi Lobed (lungfishes) Tetrapods fins Tetrapoda (amphibians, Limbs with digits reptiles, Petromyzontida mammals) Chondrichthyes Actinopterygii Actinistia Tetrapoda © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 12 0.5 m © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 13 GREEN ALGA MARINE CRUSTACEAN AQUATIC LOBE-FIN AQUATIC AQUATIC ANCESTOR ANCESTOR Anchoring Derived (roots) N/A N/A structure Support Derived (lignin/stems) Ancestral Ancestral (skeletal system) structure Derived (limbs) Internal Derived (vascular system) Ancestral Ancestral transport Muscle/ N/A Ancestral Ancestral CHARACTER nerve cells Protection Derived (cuticle) Ancestral Derived against (amniotic egg/scales) desiccation Gas exchange Derived (stomata) Derived (tracheal system) Ancestral ORGANISM TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL LAND PLANTS INSECTS VERTEBRATES © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 14 Cephalothorax Abdomen Antennae Thorax Head (sensory reception) Swimming appen- dages (one pair per abdominal segment) Walking legs Pincer Mouthparts (defense) (feeding) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 15 Lepidopterans Hymenopterans Hemipterans © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 16 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 17 Fish Tetrapod Characters Characters Scales Neck Fins Ribs Gills and lungs Fin skeleton Flat skull Eyes on top of skull Shoulder bones Neck Ribs Head Scales Eyes on top of skull Flat skull Humerus Ulna “Wrist” Elbow Radius Fin Fin skeleton © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 18 Lungfishes Eusthenopteron Panderichthys Tiktaalik Acanthostega Tulerpeton Limbs with digits Amphibians Key to limb bones Ulna Amniotes Radius Humerus Silurian PALEOZOIC Devonian Carboniferous Permian 415 400 385 370 355 340 325 310 295 280 265 0 Time (millions of years ago) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 19 Caecilians have Salamanders no legs and are retain their tails mainly burrowing as adults. animals. Frogs and toads lack tails as adults. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 20 Extraembryonic membranes Allantois Chorion Amnion Yolk sac Embryo Amniotic cavity with amniotic fluid Yolk (nutrients) Shell Albumen © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 21 †Plesiosaurs Crocodilians †Pterosaurs † Common Ornithischian Turtles ancestor dinosaurs of reptiles †Saurischian dinosaurs other Common than birds ancestor of dinosaurs Birds Turtles Tuataras Squamates Squamates Crocodilians Birds Tuataras © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 22 Monotremes Marsupials Eutherians © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 23 New World monkeys Old World monkeys Gibbons “Apes” Orangutans Gorillas Chimpanzees and bonobos Humans © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 24 Murky, poorly-mixed Low oxygen Cyanobacteria (a) Ocean conditions before 600 mya Clear, well-mixed High oxygen Eukaryotic algae (b) Changes to ocean conditions by 530 mya © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 25 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 26 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 Age atmaturity (years) 5.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 27 Other An endangered invertebrates Pacific island land snail, Partula suturalis Molluscs Insects Birds Fishes Amphibians Mammals Reptiles (excluding birds) Workers on a mound of pearl Recorded extinctions of animal mussels killed to make buttons species (ca. 1919) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 28 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambrian Phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy
    MONIKA JACHOWICZ-ZDANOWSKA Cambrian phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – taxonomy and biostratigraphy Polish Geological Institute Special Papers,28 WARSZAWA 2013 CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................6 Geological setting and lithostratigraphy.............................................8 Summary of Cambrian chronostratigraphy and acritarch biostratigraphy ...........................13 Review of previous palynological studies ...........................................17 Applied techniques and material studied............................................18 Biostratigraphy ........................................................23 BAMA I – Pulvinosphaeridium antiquum–Pseudotasmanites Assemblage Zone ....................25 BAMA II – Asteridium tornatum–Comasphaeridium velvetum Assemblage Zone ...................27 BAMA III – Ichnosphaera flexuosa–Comasphaeridium molliculum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone .........30 BAMA IV – Skiagia–Eklundia campanula Assemblage Zone ..............................39 BAMA V – Skiagia–Eklundia varia Assemblage Zone .................................39 BAMA VI – Volkovia dentifera–Liepaina plana Assemblage Zone (Moczyd³owska, 1991) ..............40 BAMA VII – Ammonidium bellulum–Ammonidium notatum Assemblage Zone ....................40 BAMA VIII – Turrisphaeridium semireticulatum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...................41 BAMA IX – Adara alea–Multiplicisphaeridium llynense Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...............42 Regional significance of the biostratigraphic
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • (= Amphioxus) Branchiostoma Floridae
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 130: 71-84,1996 Published January 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Larval settlement, post-settlement growth and secondary production of the Florida lancelet (= amphioxus) Branchiostoma floridae M. D. Stokes* Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093-0202, USA ABSTRACT A population of Branch~ostomaflondae in Tampa Bay, Flonda, USA was sieved from the substratum frequently (often daily) from June 1992 through September 1994 Body lengths were mea- sured for 54264 luvenlle and adult lancelets The breedlng season lasted each year from early May through early September and newly metamorphosed lancelets settled as luveniles from late May through mid October, dunng this period of the year dlstinct settlements occurred approxmately every 1 to 3 wk Post-settlement growth was followed as changes in modal length on size-frequency histo- grams Changes in cohort growth over this peliod were compared to several different simple and seasonally oscillating growth models The von Bertalanffy functlon in smple and oscillating forms provided the best estmates of lancelet growth The lancelets grew in summer (almost 0 5 mm d-' in recently settled luveniles), but growth slowed and almost ceased durlng wlnter B flondae can llve at least 2 yr and can reach a maxlmum length of 58 mm The maximal secondary productlon was 61 53 g m-' yrrl (ash-free dry welght) and the productlon to biomass ratio was 11 64 Population den- sities at the study site ranged from about 100 to 1200 lancelets m ' KEY WORDS: Lancelet . Amphioxus . Branchiostorna flondae . Growth . Production . Breeding season .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Introduction
    Marine and Freshwater Miscellanea III KEY TRAITS OF AMPHIOXUS SPECIES (CEPHALOCHORDATA) AND THE GOLT1 Daniel Pauly and Elaine Chu Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C, Canada Email: [email protected] Abstract Major biological traits of amphioxus species (Cephalochordata) are presented with emphasis on the size reached by their 32 valid species in the genera Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (25 spp.), and Epigonichthys (5 spp.) and on related features, i.e., growth parameters and size at first maturity. Overall, these traits combined with features of their respiration, suggest that the cephalochordates conform to the Gill Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT), which relates the growth performance of water-breathing ectotherms to the surface area of their respiratory organ(s). Introduction The small fish-like animals know as ‘lancelet‘ or ‘amphioxius’ belong the subphylum Cephalochordata, which is either a sister group, or related to the ancestor of the vertebrate animals (see Garcia-Fernàndez and Benito-Gutierrez 2008). The cephalochordates consist of 3 families (the Asymmetronidae, Epigonichthyidae and Branchiostomidae), with one genus each, Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (24 spp.) and Epigonichthys (6 spp.), as detailed in Table 1 and SeaLifeBase (www.sealifebase.org). This contribution is to assemble some of the basic biological traits of lancelets (Figure 1), notably the maximum size each of their 34 species can reach, which is easily their most important attribute, though it is often ignored (Haldane 1926). Finally, reported lengths at first maturity of cephalochordates were related to the corresponding, population-specific maximum length, to test whether these animals mature as predicted by the Gill- Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT; see Pauly 2021a, 2021b).
    [Show full text]
  • New Dinoflagellate Cyst and Acritarch Taxa from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of the Eastern North Atlantic (DSDP Site 610)
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6 (1): 101–117 Issued 22 February 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477201907002167 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum New dinoflagellate cyst and acritarch taxa from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of the eastern North Atlantic (DSDP Site 610) Stijn De Schepper∗ Cambridge Quaternary, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom Martin J. Head† Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada SYNOPSIS A palynological study of Pliocene and Pleistocene deposits from DSDP Hole 610A in the eastern North Atlantic has revealed the presence of several new organic-walled dinoflagellate cyst taxa. Impagidinium cantabrigiense sp. nov. first appeared in the latest Pliocene, within an inter- val characterised by a paucity of new dinoflagellate cyst species. Operculodinium? eirikianum var. crebrum var. nov. is mostly restricted to a narrow interval near the Mammoth Subchron within the Plio- cene (Piacenzian Stage) and may be a morphological adaptation to the changing climate at that time. An unusual morphotype of Melitasphaeridium choanophorum (Deflandre & Cookson, 1955) Harland & Hill, 1979 characterised by a perforated cyst wall is also documented. In addition, the stratigraphic utility of small acritarchs in the late Cenozoic of the northern North Atlantic region is emphasised and three stratigraphically restricted acritarchs Cymatiosphaera latisepta sp. nov., Lavradosphaera crista gen. et sp. nov.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of the Lancelet Branchiostoma Lanceolatum in Scottish Waters
    The Glasgow Naturalist (online 2019) Volume 27, Part 1 New records of the lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum in Scottish waters M. O’Reilly1, S. Nowacki1, M. Baptie1, E. Gerrie1 & M. MacKenzie2 1Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, 6 Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ 2Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Graesser House, Fodderty Way, Dingwall IV15 9XB 1E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT New records of the lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum from Scottish waters are presented. Most of the records originate from sublittoral monitoring around fish farms from Orkney, Shetland, the Western Isles, the Isles of Skye and Mull, but also from a distillery discharge in the Firth of Clyde and a plankton survey in the Sea of the Hebrides. Lancelets were recovered in sediment grab samples from 6 - 60 m depth. Some recent accounts of intertidal lancelets are also cited. The lancelets appear to prefer coarser sediments and in the fish farm surveys were found predominantly at reference sites, away from the immediate influence of farm deposition. INTRODUCTION The lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas, 1774) is an obscure, vaguely fish-like creature, up to 8 cm long, which lives buried in sand or coarse sediments in British seas. Its body is laterally compressed, pinkish white in colour, and pointed at both ends with a lance- like tail fin (Fig. 1). There are no paired fins, nor eyes, nor even a well-defined head, and it has only a small mouth surrounded by cirri, used to filter organic matter from the surrounding water. It has a dorsal notochord and segmented muscle blocks allowing it to swim in a sinusoidal fish-like manner, but no backbone, and it is therefore classified as an invertebrate (Barnes, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Chordates Video Guide
    Branches on the Tree of Life DVD – CHORDATES Written and photographed by David Denning and Bruce Russell ©2005, BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES (THUMBNAIL IMAGES IN THIS GUIDE ARE FROM THE DVD PROGRAM) .. .. To many students, the phylum Chordata doesn’t seem to make much sense. It contains such apparently disparate animals as tunicates (sea squirts), lancelets, fish and humans. This program explores the evolution, structure and classification of chordates with the main goal to clarify the unity of Phylum Chordata. All chordates possess four characteristics that define the phylum, although in most species, these characteristics can only be seen during a relatively small portion of the life cycle (and this is often an embryonic or larval stage, when the animal is difficult to observe). These defining characteristics are: the notochord (dorsal stiffening rod), a hollow dorsal nerve cord; pharyngeal gills; and a post anal tail that includes the notochord and nerve cord. Subphylum Urochordata The most primitive chordates are the tunicates or sea squirts, and closely related groups such as the larvaceans (Appendicularians). In tunicates, the chordate characteristics can be observed only by examining the entire life cycle. The adult feeds using a ‘pharyngeal basket’, a type of pharyngeal gill formed into a mesh-like basket. Cilia on the gill draw water into the mouth, through the basket mesh and out the excurrent siphon. Tunicates have an unusual heart which pumps by ‘wringing out’. It also reverses direction periodically. Tunicates are usually hermaphroditic, often casting eggs and sperm directly into the sea. After fertilization, the zygote develops into a ‘tadpole larva’. This swimming larva shows the remaining three chordate characters - notochord, dorsal nerve cord and post-anal tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Decelerated Genome Evolution in Modern Vertebrates Revealed by Analysis of Multiple Lancelet Genomes
    ARTICLE Received 20 May 2014 | Accepted 18 Nov 2014 | Published 19 Dec 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6896 OPEN Decelerated genome evolution in modern vertebrates revealed by analysis of multiple lancelet genomes Shengfeng Huang1, Zelin Chen1, Xinyu Yan1, Ting Yu1, Guangrui Huang1, Qingyu Yan1, Pierre Antoine Pontarotti2, Hongchen Zhao1, Jie Li1, Ping Yang1, Ruihua Wang1, Rui Li1, Xin Tao1, Ting Deng1, Yiquan Wang3,4, Guang Li3,4, Qiujin Zhang5, Sisi Zhou1, Leiming You1, Shaochun Yuan1, Yonggui Fu1, Fenfang Wu1, Meiling Dong1, Shangwu Chen1 & Anlong Xu1,6 Vertebrates diverged from other chordates B500 Myr ago and experienced successful innovations and adaptations, but the genomic basis underlying vertebrate origins are not fully understood. Here we suggest, through comparison with multiple lancelet (amphioxus) genomes, that ancient vertebrates experienced high rates of protein evolution, genome rearrangement and domain shuffling and that these rates greatly slowed down after the divergence of jawed and jawless vertebrates. Compared with lancelets, modern vertebrates retain, at least relatively, less protein diversity, fewer nucleotide polymorphisms, domain combinations and conserved non-coding elements (CNE). Modern vertebrates also lost substantial transposable element (TE) diversity, whereas lancelets preserve high TE diversity that includes even the long-sought RAG transposon. Lancelets also exhibit rapid gene turnover, pervasive transcription, fastest exon shuffling in metazoans and substantial TE methylation not observed in other invertebrates. These new lancelet genome sequences provide new insights into the chordate ancestral state and the vertebrate evolution. 1 State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Functional Genes, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. 2 Evolution Biologique et Mode´lisation UMR 7353 Aix Marseille Universite´/CNRS, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille, France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity of Organic-Walled Eukaryotic Microfossils from the Tonian Visingsö Group, Sweden
    Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 366 The Biodiversity of Organic-Walled Eukaryotic Microfossils from the Tonian Visingsö Group, Sweden Biodiversiteten av eukaryotiska mikrofossil med organiska cellväggar från Visingsö- gruppen (tonian), Sverige Corentin Loron INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 366 The Biodiversity of Organic-Walled Eukaryotic Microfossils from the Tonian Visingsö Group, Sweden Biodiversiteten av eukaryotiska mikrofossil med organiska cellväggar från Visingsö- gruppen (tonian), Sverige Corentin Loron ISSN 1650-6553 Copyright © Corentin Loron Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2016 Abstract The Biodiversity of Organic-Walled Eukaryotic Microfossils from the Tonian Visingsö Group, Sweden Corentin Loron The diversification of unicellular, auto- and heterotrophic protists and the appearance of multicellular microorganisms is recorded in numerous Tonian age successions worldwide, including the Visingsö Group in southern Sweden. The Tonian Period (1000-720 Ma) was a time of changes in the marine environments with increasing oxygenation and a high input of mineral nutrients from the weathering continental margins to shallow shelves, where marine life thrived. This is well documented by the elevated level of biodiversity seen in global microfossil
    [Show full text]
  • Acritarchsa Review
    Biol. Rev. (1993), 68, pp. 475-538 475 Printed in Great Britain ACRITARCHS: A REVIEW B y FRANCINE MARTIN Département de Paléontologie, Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, rue Vautier 29, R-1040 B ruxelles, Belgium (Received 21 Ja n u a ry 1993; accepted 23 M arch 1993) CONTENTS I. Introduction 47^ II. How to find, isolate and recognize an acritarch ........ 476 (1) Sampling. ........................................ • 47Ó (2) Preparation .............. 47$ (3) Size and morphology .................................................. 479 (4) Organic wall 4^7 (i) Sporopollenin-like material .......... 487 (ii) Thermal alteration ............ 489 III. Biological affinities. ............. 491 (1) Before and after Evitt (1963) ........... 491 (2) Reassessment of some acritarchs .......... 493 (i) Links with dinoflagellates.............................................................. 494 (ii) Links with prasinophytes ......................................................................... 497 (iii) Enigmatic sphaeromorphs .......... 499 (iv) Acritarchs, euglenoids or single spore-like bodies ? ...... 501 (v) Recent incertae sedis and crustacean eggs........ 501 IV. Reworking and palaeoecology ........... 5° 2 (1) Durable microfossils ............ 502 (2) Life-style of acritarchs ............ 503 V. Acritarchs through geological time .......... 504 (1) Precambrian .............. 5°5 (i) Before acritarchs ............ 5°6 (ii) Appearance of acritarchs ........... 506 (2) Precambrian-Cambrian boundary ......................................................5°9
    [Show full text]
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences Emerging Frontiers Theoretical
    Directorate for Biological Sciences Emerging Frontiers Theoretical Biology Proposal Classification Worksheet In each category, please choose the most specific descriptors. CATEGORY I: INVESTIGATOR STATUS (Select ONE) Beginning Investigator - No previous Federal support as PI or Co-PI, excluding fellowships, dissertations, planning grants, etc. Prior Federal support only Current Federal support only Current & prior Federal support CATEGORY II: FIELDS OF SCIENCE OTHER THAN BIOLOGY INVOLVED IN THIS RESEARCH (Select 1 to 3) Astronomy Engineering Psychology Chemistry Mathematics Social Sciences Computer Science Physics None of the Above Earth Science CATEGORY III: SUBSTANTIVE AREA (No selection required) CATEGORY IV: INFRASTRUCTURE (No selection required) CATEGORY V: HABITAT (No selection required) CATEGORY VI: GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF THE RESEARCH (No selection required) CATEGORY VII: CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANISMS (Select 1 to 4) VIRUSES Chytridiomycota Anthocerotae (Hornworts) Bacterial Mitosporic Fungi Hepaticae (Liverworts) Plant Oomycota Musci (Mosses) Animal Yeasts VASCULAR PLANTS PROKARYOTES Zygomycota FERNS & FERN ALLIES GYMNOSPERMS Archaebacteria LICHENS Cyanobacteria SLIME MOLDS Coniferales (Conifers) Cycadales (Cycads) Eubacteria ALGAE Ginkgoales (Ginkgo) PROTISTA (PROTOZOA) Bacillariophyta (Diatoms) Gnetales (Gnetophytes) Amoebae Charophyta ANGIOSPERMS Apicomplexa Chlorophyta Monocots Ciliophora Chrysophyta Arecaceae (Palmae) Flagellates Dinoflagellata Cyperaceae Foraminifera Euglenoids Liliaceae Microspora Phaeophyta Orchidaceae Radiolaria
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Cyclostomes (Lamprey and Hagfish) Sebastian M
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2091 Development 139, 2091-2099 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074716 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish) Sebastian M. Shimeld1,* and Phillip C. J. Donoghue2 Summary and is appealing because it implies a gradual assembly of vertebrate Lampreys and hagfish, which together are known as the characters, and supports the hagfish and lampreys as experimental cyclostomes or ‘agnathans’, are the only surviving lineages of models for distinct craniate and vertebrate evolutionary grades (i.e. jawless fish. They diverged early in vertebrate evolution, perceived ‘stages’ in evolution). However, only comparative before the origin of the hinged jaws that are characteristic of morphology provides support for this phylogenetic hypothesis. The gnathostome (jawed) vertebrates and before the evolution of competing hypothesis, which unites lampreys and hagfish as sister paired appendages. However, they do share numerous taxa in the clade Cyclostomata, thus equally related to characteristics with jawed vertebrates. Studies of cyclostome gnathostomes, has enjoyed unequivocal support from phylogenetic development can thus help us to understand when, and how, analyses of protein-coding sequence data (e.g. Delarbre et al., 2002; key aspects of the vertebrate body evolved. Here, we Furlong and Holland, 2002; Kuraku et al., 1999). Support for summarise the development of cyclostomes, highlighting the cyclostome theory is now overwhelming, with the recognition of key species studied and experimental methods available. We novel families of non-coding microRNAs that are shared then discuss how studies of cyclostomes have provided exclusively by hagfish and lampreys (Heimberg et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]