DOCSLIB.ORG

Directorate for Biological Sciences Emerging Frontiers Theoretical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Directorate for Biological Sciences Emerging Frontiers Theoretical Directorate for Biological Sciences Emerging Frontiers Theoretical Biology Proposal Classification Worksheet In each category, please choose the most specific descriptors. CATEGORY I: INVESTIGATOR STATUS (Select ONE) Beginning Investigator - No previous Federal support as PI or Co-PI, excluding fellowships, dissertations, planning grants, etc. Prior Federal support only Current Federal support only Current & prior Federal support CATEGORY II: FIELDS OF SCIENCE OTHER THAN BIOLOGY INVOLVED IN THIS RESEARCH (Select 1 to 3) Astronomy Engineering Psychology Chemistry Mathematics Social Sciences Computer Science Physics None of the Above Earth Science CATEGORY III: SUBSTANTIVE AREA (No selection required) CATEGORY IV: INFRASTRUCTURE (No selection required) CATEGORY V: HABITAT (No selection required) CATEGORY VI: GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF THE RESEARCH (No selection required) CATEGORY VII: CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANISMS (Select 1 to 4) VIRUSES Chytridiomycota Anthocerotae (Hornworts) Bacterial Mitosporic Fungi Hepaticae (Liverworts) Plant Oomycota Musci (Mosses) Animal Yeasts VASCULAR PLANTS PROKARYOTES Zygomycota FERNS & FERN ALLIES GYMNOSPERMS Archaebacteria LICHENS Cyanobacteria SLIME MOLDS Coniferales (Conifers) Cycadales (Cycads) Eubacteria ALGAE Ginkgoales (Ginkgo) PROTISTA (PROTOZOA) Bacillariophyta (Diatoms) Gnetales (Gnetophytes) Amoebae Charophyta ANGIOSPERMS Apicomplexa Chlorophyta Monocots Ciliophora Chrysophyta Arecaceae (Palmae) Flagellates Dinoflagellata Cyperaceae Foraminifera Euglenoids Liliaceae Microspora Phaeophyta Orchidaceae Radiolaria Rhodophyta Poaceae (Graminae) FUNGI PLANTS Dicots Ascomycota N0N-VASCULAR PLANTS Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) Basidiomycota BRYOPHYTA Asteraceae (Compositae) Page 1 Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) Cheliceriformes Asteroidea (Starfish, Sea Stars) Fabaceae (Leguminosae) Merostomata (Horseshoe Crabs) Ophiuroidea (Brittle Stars, Serpent Stars) Lamiaceae (Labiatae) Pycnogonida (Sea Spiders) Echinoidea (Sea Urchins, Sand Rosaceae Scorpionida (Scorpions) Dollars) Solanaceae Araneae (True Spiders) Holothuroidea (Sea Cucumbers) ANIMALS Pseudoscorpionida HEMICHORDATA (Acorn Worms, (Pseudoscorpions) Pterobranchs) INVERTEBRATES Acarina (Free-living Mites) MESOZOA/PLACOZOA UROCHORDATA (Tunicata) (Tunicates, Parasitiformes (Parasitic Ticks & Sea Squirts, Salps, Ascideans) PORIFERA (Sponges) Mites) CEPHALOCHORDATA CNIDARIA Crustacea (Amphioxus/Lancelet) Hydrozoa (Hydra, etc.) Branchiopoda (Fairy Shrimp, Water VERTEBRATES Scyphozoa (Jellyfish) Flea) AGNATHA (Hagfish, Lamprey) Ostracoda (Sea Lice) Anthozoa (Corals, Sea Anemones) FISHES CTENOPHORA (Comb Jellies) Copepoda Chondrichthyes (Cartilaginous Fishes) (Sharks, Rays, Ratfish) PLATYHELMINTHES (Flatworms) Cirripedia (Barnacles) Osteichthyes (Bony Fishes) Turbellaria (Planarians) Amphipoda (Skeleton Shrimp, Whale Lice, Freshwater Shrimp) Sarcopterygia (Lobe-finned Fishes) Trematoda (Flukes) Isopoda (Wood Lice, Pillbugs) (Coelacanth, Lungfish) Cestoda (Tapeworms) Decapoda (Lobster, Crayfish, Actinopterygia (Ray-finned Fishes) Monogenea (Flukes) Crabs, Shrimp) AMPHIBIA GNATHOSTOMULIDA Hexapoda (Insecta) (Insects) Anura (Frogs, Toads) NEMERTINEA (Rynchocoela) (Ribbon Apterygota (Springtails, Silverfish, Urodela (Salamanders, Newts) Worms) etc.) Gymnophiona (Apoda) (Caecilians) ENTOPROCTA (Bryozoa) (Plant-like Odonata (Dragonflies, Damselflies) REPTILIA Animals) Ephemeroptera (Mayflies) Chelonia (Turtles, Tortoises) ASCHELMINTHES Orthoptera (Grasshoppers, Crickets) Serpentes (Snakes) Gastrotricha Dictyoptera (Cockroaches, Mantids, Kinorhyncha Phasmids) Sauria (Lizards) Loricifera Isoptera (Termites) Crocodylia (Crocodilians) Nematoda (Roundworms) Plecoptera (Stoneflies) Rhyncocephalia (Tuatara) Nematomorpha (Horsehair Worms) Phthiraptera (Mallophaga & AVES (Birds) Anoplura) (Lice) Rotifera (Rotatoria) Paleognathae (Ratites) Hemiptera (including Heteroptera) ACANTHOCEPHALA (Spiny-headed (True Bugs) Sphenisciformes (Penguins) Worms) Homoptera (Cicadas, Scale Insects, Procellariiformes (Albatrosses, Petrels, PRIAPULOIDEA Leafhoppers) Fulmars) BRYOZOA (Ectoprocta) (Plant-like Thysanoptera (Thrips) Pelecaniformes (Pelicans, Gannets, Animals) Boobies, Tropicbirds) Neuroptera (Lacewings, PHORONIDEA (Lophophorates) Dobsonflies, Snakeflies) Ciconiiformes (Herons, Bitterns, Egrets, Storks, Ibis, Flamingo) BRACHIOPODA (Lamp Shells) Trichoptera (Caddisflies) Anseriformes (Ducks, Geese, MOLLUSCA Lepidoptera (Moths, Butterflies) Screamers) Monoplacophora Diptera (Flies, Mosquitoes) Falconiformes (Vultures, Hawks, Eagles, Condors, Kites, Falcons) Aplacophora (Solenogasters) Siphonaptera (Fleas) Polyplacophora (Chitons) Galliformes (Megapodes, Turkeys, Coleoptera (Beetles) Quail, Pheasants, Peafowl, etc.) Scaphopoda (Tooth Shells) Hymenoptera (Ants, Bees, Wasps, Gruiformes (Cranes, Rails, Gallinules, Gastropoda (Snails, Slugs, Limpets) Sawflies) Coots, Bustards, Crakes) Pelecypoda (Bivalvia) (Clams, Chilopoda (Centipedes) Charadriiformes (Terns, Gulls, Stilts, Mussels, Oysters, Scallops) Diplopoda (Millipedes) Avocets, Plovers, Puffins, etc.) Cephalopoda (Squid, Octopus, Pauropoda Columbiformes (Pigeons, Doves) Nautilus) Symphyta (Symphyla) Psittaciformes (Parrots, Lories, ANNELIDA (Segmented Worms) Cockatoos, Kakapo, Conures, etc.) PENTASTOMIDA (Linguatulida) Polychaeta (Parapodial Worms) (Tongue Worms) Cuculiformes (Cuckoos, Turacos, Anis, Coucal, Roadrunner, etc.) Oligochaeta (Earthworms) TARDIGRADA (Tardigrades, Water Strigiformes (Owls) Hirudinida (Leeches) Bears) ONYCHOPHORA (Peripatus) Apodiformes (Hummingbirds, Swifts, POGONOPHORA (Beard Worms) Thornbills) CHAETOGNATHA (Arrow Worms) SIPUNCULOIDEA (Peanut Worms) Coraciformes (Kingfishers, Todies, ECHIUROIDEA (Spoon Worms) ECHINODERMATA Bee-Eaters, Rollers, Hornbills, etc.) ARTHROPODA Crinoidea (Sea Lilies, Feather Stars) Piciformes (Woodpeckers, Toucans, Jacamars, Barbets, Honeyguides) Page 2 Passeriformes (Passerines) Monkeys Ungulates MAMMALIA Apes (Gibbons, Orang-utan, Perissodactyla (Odd-toed Gorilla, Chimpanzee) Ungulates) (Horses, Rhinos, Monotremata (Platypus, Echidna) Tapirs, etc.) Humans Marsupalia (Marsupials) Artiodactyla (Even-toed Rodentia Eutheria (Placentals) Ungulates) (Cattle, Sheep, Deer, Laboratory Rodents (Rat, Mouse, Pigs, etc.) Insectivora (Hedgehogs, Moles, Guinea Pig, Hamster) Shrews, Tenrec, etc.) Sirenia (Manatees, Dugongs) Non-Laboratory Rodents Chiroptera (Bats) Proboscidea (Elephants) Lagomorphs (Rabbits, Hares, Pikas) Edentata (Anteaters, Sloths, Marine Mammals (Seals, Walrus, Armadillos) Tubulidenata (Aardvarks) Whales, Otters, Dolphins, Porpoises) Primates Carnivora (Bears, Canids, Felids, TRANSGENIC ORGANISMS Mustelids, Viverrids, Hyena, Procyonids) FOSSIL OR EXTINCT ORGANISMS NO ORGANISMS CATEGORY VIII: MODEL ORGANISM (Select ONE) NO MODEL ORGANISM MODEL ORGANISM (Input up to 9 characters) Page 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Jurassic Fossil Wood Diversity from Western Liaoning, NE China
    Jiang et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-018-0018-y Journal of Palaeogeography RESEARCH Open Access The Jurassic fossil wood diversity from western Liaoning, NE China Zi-Kun Jiang1,2, Yong-Dong Wang2,3*, Ning Tian4,5, Ao-Wei Xie2,6, Wu Zhang7, Li-Qin Li2 and Min Huang1 Abstract Western Liaoning is a unique region in China that bears diverse types of Jurassic plants, including leaves, fern rhizomes, and wood, providing significant proxy for vegetation and palaeoenvironment reconstruction of the well-known Yanliao Flora in East Asia. In particular, the silicified wood is very abundant in the fossil Lagerstätte of the Jurassic Tiaojishan Formation in Beipiao, western Liaoning. Previous and recent systematic investigations documented a high diversity of the Jurassic wood assemblages. These assemblages are dominated by conifers, followed by cycads and ginkgoaleans. In total, about 30 species belonging to 21 genera of fossil wood have been recorded so far, which are represented by Cycadopsida, Ginkgopsida, Coniferopsida, and Gymnospermae incertae sedis. The evolutionary implications of several distinctive fossil wood taxa as well as palaeoclimate implications are summarized based on their anatomical structures and growth ring patterns. This work approaches the vegetation development and evolutionary significances of the wood taxa and their relatives, and provides clues for the further understanding of the diversity of the Jurassic Yanliao Flora in East Asia. Keywords: Fossil wood, Diversity, Evolution, Tiaojishan Formation, Jurassic 1 Introduction 2004;Wangetal.,2009). Among these localities, western Fossil floras are a significant record for the vegetation Liaoning is a well-known fossil Lagerstätte with diverse and for the palaeoenvironment reconstructions of the and well-preserved fossil plant foliages and wood (Zhang Mesozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Crustacean Classification
    Zootaxa 1668: 313–325 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Crustacean classification: on-going controversies and unresolved problems* GEOFF A. BOXSHALL Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . 313 Introduction . 313 Treatment of parasitic Crustacea . 315 Affinities of the Remipedia . 316 Validity of the Entomostraca . 318 Exopodites and epipodites . 319 Using of larval characters in estimating phylogenetic relationships . 320 Fossils and the crustacean stem lineage . 321 Acknowledgements . 322 References . 322 Abstract The journey from Linnaeus’s original treatment to modern crustacean systematics is briefly characterised. Progress in our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the Crustacea is linked to continuing discoveries of new taxa, to advances in theory and to improvements in methodology. Six themes are discussed that serve to illustrate some of the major on-going controversies and unresolved problems in the field as well as to illustrate changes that have taken place since the time of Linnaeus. These themes are: 1. the treatment of parasitic Crustacea, 2. the affinities of the Remipedia, 3. the validity of the Entomostraca, 4. exopodites and epipodites, 5. using larval characters in estimating phylogenetic rela- tionships, and 6. fossils and the crustacean stem-lineage. It is concluded that the development of the stem lineage concept for the Crustacea has been dominated by consideration of taxa known only from larval or immature stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 20 Years of Plant Genome Sequencing: an Unprecedented Resource in Need of More Diverse Representation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446451; this version posted May 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from 20 years of plant genome sequencing: an unprecedented resource in need of more diverse representation Authors: Rose A. Marks1,2,3, Scott Hotaling4, Paul B. Frandsen5,6, and Robert VanBuren1,2 1. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2. Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 4. School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 5. Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA 6. Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Keywords: plants, embryophytes, genomics, colonialism, broadening participation Correspondence: Rose A. Marks, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Email: [email protected]; Phone: (603) 852-3190; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-5959 Abstract The field of plant genomics has grown rapidly in the past 20 years, leading to dramatic increases in both the quantity and quality of publicly available genomic resources. With an ever- expanding wealth of genomic data from an increasingly diverse set of taxa, unprecedented potential exists to better understand the evolution and genome biology of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • (= Amphioxus) Branchiostoma Floridae
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 130: 71-84,1996 Published January 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Larval settlement, post-settlement growth and secondary production of the Florida lancelet (= amphioxus) Branchiostoma floridae M. D. Stokes* Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093-0202, USA ABSTRACT A population of Branch~ostomaflondae in Tampa Bay, Flonda, USA was sieved from the substratum frequently (often daily) from June 1992 through September 1994 Body lengths were mea- sured for 54264 luvenlle and adult lancelets The breedlng season lasted each year from early May through early September and newly metamorphosed lancelets settled as luveniles from late May through mid October, dunng this period of the year dlstinct settlements occurred approxmately every 1 to 3 wk Post-settlement growth was followed as changes in modal length on size-frequency histo- grams Changes in cohort growth over this peliod were compared to several different simple and seasonally oscillating growth models The von Bertalanffy functlon in smple and oscillating forms provided the best estmates of lancelet growth The lancelets grew in summer (almost 0 5 mm d-' in recently settled luveniles), but growth slowed and almost ceased durlng wlnter B flondae can llve at least 2 yr and can reach a maxlmum length of 58 mm The maximal secondary productlon was 61 53 g m-' yrrl (ash-free dry welght) and the productlon to biomass ratio was 11 64 Population den- sities at the study site ranged from about 100 to 1200 lancelets m ' KEY WORDS: Lancelet . Amphioxus . Branchiostorna flondae . Growth . Production . Breeding season .
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the End-Permian Dead Zone
    Life in the end-Permian dead zone Cindy V. Looy*†, Richard J. Twitchett‡, David L. Dilcher§, Johanna H. A. Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert*, and Henk Visscher* *Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0740; and §Paleobotany Laboratory, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Contributed by David L. Dilcher, May 1, 2001 The fossil record of land plants is an obvious source of information ecological crisis. On the basis of palynological data from a ‘‘dead on the dynamics of mass extinctions in the geological past. In zone’’ in a Permian–Triassic (P-Tr) transition sequence from conjunction with the end-Permian ecological crisis, Ϸ250 million East Greenland, in this paper we document evidence of non- years ago, palynological data from East Greenland reveal some equilibrium vegetation dynamics resulting in selective but time- unanticipated patterns. We document the significant time lag delayed extinctions among woody gymnosperms. between terrestrial ecosystem collapse and selective extinction among characteristic Late Permian plants. Furthermore, ecological The End-Permian ‘‘Dead Zone’’ crisis resulted in an initial increase in plant diversity, instead of a Latest Permian and earliest Triassic sediments in East Green- decrease. Paradoxically, these floral patterns correspond to a land (Fig. 1) are represented by the upper part of the Schuchert ‘‘dead zone’’ in the end-Permian faunal record, characterized by a Dal Formation and the overlying Wordie Creek Formation. The paucity of marine invertebrate megafossils. The time-delayed, predominantly fine-grained siliciclastic sediments of these for- end-Permian plant extinctions resemble modeled ‘‘extinction mations were deposited in a narrow, elongate, shallow-marine debt’’ responses of multispecies metapopulations to progressive basin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visual Guide to Collecting Plant Tissues for DNA
    A visual guide to collecting plant tissues for DNA Collecting kit checklist Silica gel1 Permanent marker and pencil Resealable bags, airtight plastic container Razor blade / Surgical scissors Empty tea bags or coffee filters Ethanol and paper tissue or ethanol wipes Tags or jewellers tags Plant press and collecting book 1. Selection and preparation of fresh plant tissue: Sampling avoided. Breaking up leaf material will bruise the plant tissue, which will result in enzymes being released From a single plant, harvest 3 – 5 mature leaves, or that cause DNA degradation. Ideally, leaf material sample a piece of a leaf, if large (Picture A). Ideally should be cut into smaller fragments with thick a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2 should be enough, but this midribs being removed (Picture C). If sampling robust amount should be adjusted if the plant material is leaf tissue (e.g. cycads, palms), use a razor blade or rich in water (e.g. a succulent plant). If leaves are surgical scissors (Picture D). small (e.g. ericoid leaves), sample enough material to equate a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2. If no leaves are Succulent plants available, other parts can be sampled such as leaf buds, flowers, bracts, seeds or even fresh bark. If the If the leaves are succulent, use a razor blade to plant is small, select the biggest specimen, but never remove epidermal slices or scoop out parenchyma combine tissues from different individuals. tissue (Picture E). Cleaning Ideally, collect clean fresh tissues, however if the leaf or plant material is dirty or shows potential contamination (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Introduction
    Marine and Freshwater Miscellanea III KEY TRAITS OF AMPHIOXUS SPECIES (CEPHALOCHORDATA) AND THE GOLT1 Daniel Pauly and Elaine Chu Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C, Canada Email: [email protected] Abstract Major biological traits of amphioxus species (Cephalochordata) are presented with emphasis on the size reached by their 32 valid species in the genera Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (25 spp.), and Epigonichthys (5 spp.) and on related features, i.e., growth parameters and size at first maturity. Overall, these traits combined with features of their respiration, suggest that the cephalochordates conform to the Gill Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT), which relates the growth performance of water-breathing ectotherms to the surface area of their respiratory organ(s). Introduction The small fish-like animals know as ‘lancelet‘ or ‘amphioxius’ belong the subphylum Cephalochordata, which is either a sister group, or related to the ancestor of the vertebrate animals (see Garcia-Fernàndez and Benito-Gutierrez 2008). The cephalochordates consist of 3 families (the Asymmetronidae, Epigonichthyidae and Branchiostomidae), with one genus each, Asymmetron (2 spp.), Branchiostoma (24 spp.) and Epigonichthys (6 spp.), as detailed in Table 1 and SeaLifeBase (www.sealifebase.org). This contribution is to assemble some of the basic biological traits of lancelets (Figure 1), notably the maximum size each of their 34 species can reach, which is easily their most important attribute, though it is often ignored (Haldane 1926). Finally, reported lengths at first maturity of cephalochordates were related to the corresponding, population-specific maximum length, to test whether these animals mature as predicted by the Gill- Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT; see Pauly 2021a, 2021b).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Arthropoda
    Phylum Arthropoda General Characteristics of phylum shared by members of all subphyla: -chitinous, hardened exoskeleton that must be shed to grow -obvious segmentation (metamerism) -paired, jointed appendages on many segments Subphylum: Trilobita body plan: head, thorax, pygidium compound eyes antennae mandibles for feeding? branched (biramous) lappendages respiration by gills? able to roll up like pill bugs once most common arthropod, now completely extinct Subphylum: Myriopoda (centipedes, millipedes) body plan: head, long trunk lack compound eyes single pair of antennae mandibles for feeding Major Groups : unbranched legs on most segments Chilopoda (centipedes) respiration by tracheae Diplopoda (millipedes) Subphylum Chelicerata: (spiders, horshoe crab, scorpions, mites, ticks) body plan: cephalothorax, abdomen most lack compound eyes no antennae Major Classes : chelicerae for feeding (no mandibles) Merostomata (horshoe crabs) four pairs of unbranched legs Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites & ticks) respiration by gills, book lungs, book gills or tracheae Pycnogonida (sea spiders) Subphylum Crustacea: (crabs, shrimp, crayfish, barnacles, pill bugs, water fleas) body plan: cephalothorax, abdomen, tail compound eyes two pairs of antennae Major Classes : mandibles for feeding Malacostraca (shrimp, crab, pill bugs, amphipods) branched (biramous) appendages Branchiopoda (water fleas, brine shrimp, fairy shrimp) respiration by gills Maxillipoda (copepods, seed shrimp, barnacles) only subphylum that is mostly aquatic Subphylum: Hexapoda (beetles, flies, bugs, crickets, mayflies, dragonflies, moths, wasps, etc.) body plan: head, thorax, abdomen compound eyes single pair of antennae mandibles for feeding three pairs of unbranched legs Major Groups : two pairs of wings Apterygota (wingless insects; springtails, silverfish) respiration by tracheae Pterygota (flying insects; dragonflies, butterflies, etc) includes only invertebrates that can fly.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • Zborník Príspevkov Z Vedeckého Kongresu „Zoológia 2016“
    Slovenská zoologická spoločnosť pri SAV a Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Zborník príspevkov z vedeckého kongresu „Zoológia 2016“ Zuzana Krumpálová, Martina Zigová & Filip Tulis (eds) Nitra 2016 Editori Zuzana Krumpálová, Martina Zigová & Filip Tulis Garanti podujatia doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Josef Bryja, Ph.D. doc. PaedDr. Stanislav David, PhD. RNDr. Anton Krištín, DrSc. Vedecký výbor (recenzenti) Organizačný výbor RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. doc. Mgr. Ivan Baláž, PhD. (predseda) doc. Mgr. Ivan Baláž, PhD. RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. doc. Mgr. Peter Fenďa, PhD. RNDr. Peter Bačkor, PhD. doc. Vladimír Kubovčík, PhD. Mgr. Henrich Grežo, PhD. doc. RNDr. Zuzana Krumpálová, PhD. doc. Ing. Vladimír Kubovčík, PhD. Ing. Peter Lešo, PhD. Mgr. Peter Manko, PhD. Mgr. Peter Manko, PhD. Mgr. Ladislav Pekárik, PhD. RNDr. Roman Slobodník, PhD. RNDr. Peter Petluš, PhD. doc. RNDr. Michal Stanko, DrSc. Ing. Viera Petlušová, PhD. doc. Ing. Peter Urban, PhD. RNDr. Roman Slobodník, PhD. Mgr. Michal Ševčík Mgr. Filip Tulis, PhD. Mgr. Martina Zigová Mgr. Martin Zemko Publikované príspevky boli recenzované. Za odbornú úroveň príspevkov zodpovedajú autori a recenzenti. Rukopis neprešiel jazykovou úpravou. Vydavateľ: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Edícia: Prírodovedec č. 645 Formát: B5 Rok vydania: 2016 Miesto vydania: Nitra Počet strán: 250 Tlač: Vydavateľstvo SPU v Nitre Náklad: 150 kusov © Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre ISBN 978-80-558-1102-4 Všetky práva vyhradené. Žiadna časť textu ani ilustrácie nemôžu byť použité na ďalšie šírenie akoukoľvek formou bez predchádzajúceho súhlasu autora alebo vydavateľa. Vedecké príspevky sú zoradené podľa priezviska autora príspevku v abecednom poradí. „Zoológia 2016“ 24. – 26. november 2016, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Program kongresu „Zoológia 2016“ 24.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponges Cnidarians Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Ediacaran Arthropods 635 Cambrian PALEOZOIC PROTEROZOIC 605 Time (Mil
    © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Sponges Cnidarians Echinoderms Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Arthropods PROTEROZOIC PALEOZOIC Ediacaran Cambrian 635 605 575 545 515 485 0 Time (millions of years age) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 Food particles in mucus Choanocyte Collar Flagellum Choanocyte Phagocytosis of Amoebocyte food particles Pores Spicules Water flow Amoebocytes Azure vase sponge (Callyspongia plicifera) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 (a) Hydrozoa (b) Scyphozoa (c) Anthozoa © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 15 µm 75 µm (a) Valeria (800 mya): (b) Spiny acritarch roughly spherical, no (575 mya): about five structural defenses, times larger than soft-bodied Valeria and covered in hard spines © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 5 (a) Radial symmetry (b) Bilateral symmetry © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 6 Body cavity Body covering (from ectoderm) Tissue layer lining body cavity and suspending Digestive tract internal organs (from endoderm) (from mesoderm) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 7 Porifera Metazoa Ctenophora ANCESTRAL Eumetazoa PROTIST Cnidaria Deuterostomia Hemichordata 770 million Echinodermata years ago 680 million Chordata years ago Lophotrochozoa Lophotrochozoa Platyhelminthes Bilateria Rotifera Ectoprocta Brachiopoda 670 million years ago Mollusca Ecdysozoa Annelida Nematoda Arthropoda © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 8 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 9 Notochord Dorsal, hollow nerve cord Muscle segments Mouth Anus Post-anal tail Pharyngeal slits or clefts © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 10 (a) Lancelet (b) Tunicate
    [Show full text]