DOCSLIB.ORG

For My Legionaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For My Legionaries FOR MY LEGIONARIES By CORNELIU ZELEA CODREANU FOR MY LEGIONARIES By CORNELIU ZELEA CODREANU Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Sign of the Legion TABLE OF CONTENTS To the legionaries STEPPING INTO LIFE In the Dobrina Forest At the University of Iasi Revolution being prepared The Guard of the National Conscience Constantin Pancu I The occupation of the Agency of State Monopolies by the Guard of the National Conscience The tricolor flag over the Nicolina Works National-Christian Socialism, the National Syndicates The Creed of National-Christian Socialism A truthful picture of the situation in 1919 The leaders of the Romanian workers The attitude of the Jewish press The first Student Congress after the War The opening of the Iasi University in the fall of 1920 The 1920-1921 university year Expelled from Iasi University forever The Council of the School of Law The 1921-1922 university year President of the Law Students' Association Visiting the Cernauti University The review "Apararea Nationala" The founding of the Association of Christian Students Obligation of honor At the end of my university studies The summer of 1922 In Germany THE STUDENT MOVEMENT December 10, 1922 The "Numerus Clausus" THE JEWISH PROBLEM The number of Jews The problem of the Romanian land The problem of the cities The problem of the Romanian school The problem of the Romanian leading class The problem of national culture The return to Romania At Iasi At Bucharest At Cluj The Assembly of Iasi, March 4, 1923. The founding of the League of National Defense March 4, 1923 81 Other anti-Semitic and nationalist organizations "The Romanian National Fascia" and "The Romanian Action" Modification of the Art. 7 of the Constitution My first arrest The great men of Romania of 1879 Vasile Conta Vasile Alecsandri Mihail Kogalniccanu Mihail Eminescu Ion Heliade Radulescu Bogdan Petriceicu Hajdeu Costache Negri A.D. Xenopol The student general strike continues June 1923 The plans of Judaism against the Romanian Nation Against the Romanian people Against the Romanian land Against the student movement Jewish arguments and attitudes The Congress of the Student movement's Leaders The L.A.N.C. Congress at Campul-Lung The October 1923 student plot In the Vacaresti prison Outside The mite of the Moti for the students in Vacaresti Thoughts of a new life The isolation of politicians Avenging the betrayal and the trial At Iasi A YEAR OF GREAT TRIALS The Christian Cultural Home The first work camp A new blow Overwhelmed by blows at the garden Upstairs, in the prefect's office On the Rarau Mountain On the Rarau Mountain My betrothal The Mota-Vlad trial Around wbat happened at the garden The word of Professor A.C. Cuza Protest meetings against Manciu An administrative investigation is ordered The fatal day Two articles regarding the Manciu case Hunger strike Alone at Galata The trial is transferred to Focsani At Turnul-Severin The trial Returning to Iasi JUNE 1925 - JUNE 1926 My wedding The baptismal ceremony at Ciorasti After one year, work resumes Dangers that threaten a political movement The critique of the leader A case of conscience In France at school In France at school General elections back home In the Alps At Pinet-d'Uriage among French peasants At Bucharest - The League of Christian National Defense broken in two What happened My reaction in the face of this state of affairs THE LEGION OF MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL The Legion of Michael the Archangel Matter versus spirit Reason Against treachery The beginnings of legionary life Our program Aspects of Romanian public life Our apprehensions facing this world The stages of the Legion's development "Pamantul Stramosesc" The contents of the first issue The fundamental principles of legionary ethics The disinterestedness in battle The disinterestedness in battle The struggle for maintaining our review Other names encountered in the first issues of our review Our action as seen from the outside Beyond forms The national movements and dictatorship The first beginnings of organization The vow of the first legionaries A new battle Problems of a material kind The summer of 1928 Fighting misery Professor Gavanescul receives the sack of earth The first assembly of nest leaders and the formation of the Legionary Senate TOWARDS THE POPULAR MASSES Among the Moti Among the Moti The decision to go to the masses December 15, 1929 In Transylvania, at Ludosul-de-Mures In Bessarabia In Bessarabia again Troubles in Maramures The march into Bessarabia is forbidden The attempt on the life of Minister Anghelescu Dissolution of the Legion of Michael the Archangel and the Iron Guard Arrest warrant The trial The legionary movement in the first elections The campaign of Neamt DEMOCRACY AGAINST THE NATION In Parliament Several observations regarding democracy Election, selection, heredity Individual, national collectivity, nation The nation The final aims of the nation Monarchy and the law of monarchy The battle of Tutova The second dissolution of the Guard New general elections In Parliament for the second time The condition of the legionary organization in 1932-1933 THE OFFENSIVE OF CALUMNIES "Anarchic and terroristic movement" "The Iron Guard in the Service of Freigners" "The Iron Guard in the Pay of Hitlerites Printing counterfeit banknotes in Rasinari The death team At Teius The dam of Visani The Liberal Party assumes responsibility for exterminating the Iron Guard Comrades This volume contains the story of my youth, from 19 to 34 years of age, with its feelings, faith, thoughts, deeds, and its errors. CORNELIU CODREANU TO THE LEGIONARIES December 6, 1935, Cannen Sylva LEGIONARIES, I write for our legionary family. For all legionaries: those in villages, In factories and in the university. I do not pay attention to any regulation imposed on book authors. I have no time. I write hastily on the battlefield, in the midst of attacks. At this hour we are surrounded on all sides. The enemies strike us treacherously and treason bites us. For two years we have been bound by the chains of an infamous censorship. For two years our name and that of legionary are tolerated by the press only to be insulted. A rain of treacheries is heaped upon us while our enemies applaud and hope that we shall perish. But these knights of cowardice, as well as their masters, will be convinced, in fact, soon, that all the attacks in which they pooled their hopes of destroying the legionary movement, all their agitation and desperate efforts, will remain fruitless. Legionaries do not die. Erect, immovable, invincible and immortal, they look forever victorious over the impotent convulsions of hatred. _ * _ The opinion created in the non-legionary world by the lines that follow is of no consequence to me and their effect upon that world does not interest me. What I want is that you, soldiers of other Romanian horizons, while reading these recollections, recognize in them your own past and remember your battles; that you re-live the suffering you endured and the blows you took for our people; that you fill your hearts with fire and stand firm in the difficult and righteous struggle in which you are engaged and out of which we all have the command to emerge either victorious or dead. I think of you as I write. Of you who will have to die, receiving the baptism of death with the serenity of our ancestral Thracians. And of you, those who will have to step over the dead and their tombs, carrying in your hands the victorious banners of the Romanians. STEPPING INTO LIFE IN THE DOBRINA FOREST Here we are, congregated one afternoon in the spring of 1919 in the Dobrina Forest which stands sentinel on the heights around Husi. Who? A group of about 20 high school students, sophomores, juniors and seniors. I called these young comrades together to discuss a grave problem, though our life was but budding. What are we going to do if the Bolsheviks invade us? My opinion, with which the others were in accord, was this: if the Bolshevik army crosses the Dniester, then the Pruth, reaching our region, we shall not submit, but will take refuge in the woods armed; we will organize there a center of Romanian action and resistance, and by skillful action shake up the enemy; we will maintain a spirit of non-submission, and keep alive a spark of hope amidst the Romanian masses in villages and towns. We all took an oath in the middle of the ancient forest. This forest was a corner of that famous woods of Tigheciu on whose paths, throughout Moldavia's history, many an enemy found death. We decided to acquire weapons and ammunition, to maintain total secrecy, to engage in reconnoitering and battle exercises there in the forest and to establish a front which would mask our intentions. We easily found this front and we soon brought it into being: a cultural-national association of the students at the high school of Husi which we named "Mihail Kogalniceanu." It was approved by the high school principal. Then we began get-togethers and lectures in town. We treated the customary subjects in public, while in the woods we simulated battle exercises. In those titnes one could find weapons everywhere, so that within about two weeks we collected all we needed. _*_ There was then such a chaotic state of affairs in the country that we, though but children hardly over 18 years of age, understood all too well. Everybody was thinking about the Bolshevik revolution which was well underway only a few steps over the border. The peasantry was opposed to this destroying wave out of instinct, but completely disorganized, could not put up a serious resistance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Titu Maiorescu - the First Translator of Arthur Schopenhauer’S Works in Europe
    Iulian Boldea (Editor) - Literature, Discourses and the Power of Multicultural Dialogue Arhipelag XXI Press, Tîrgu Mureș, 2017. eISBN: 978-606-8624-12-9 TITU MAIORESCU - THE FIRST TRANSLATOR OF ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER’S WORKS IN EUROPE Luiza Marinescu Assoc. Prof., PhD, ”Spiru Haret” University of Bucharest Abstract: Throughout his entire life and work, Titu Maiorescu (1840-1917) could be considered a great thinker, a tutor and a fighter for assertion of values in Romanian culture in one of the most emergent epochs in the history of Romanian literature: 1863-1917. Arthur Schopenhauer came into the world on February 22, 1788 in Danzig [Gdansk, Poland] in a Dutch family implied in international business trade both as a merchant and as a ship-owner. As a translator in Romanian of Arthur Schopenhauerřs work (1788-1866), Titu Maiorescu opened new knowledge tracks to the work of one of the most important thinkers of the time, whose philosophy, with an aesthetic perception of life, more musical and literary in the ability of expression and in the styles of understanding had been widely influential in the 20th century thinkers. Both scholars, Arthur Schopenhauer and Titu Maiorescu stated that the highest purpose of art is to communicate Platonic Ideas. The subject matter and stylistic arrangement of the Aphorisms were significant influences on the work of Titu Maiorescu whose later work exploresŕfollowing Schopenhauerŕ the relation of man to himself, the universe, the state, and women through the art of aphorism. Keywords: Titu Maiorescu, Zizin Cantacuzino, Arthur Schopenhauer, first European translation of Parerga und Paralipomena, aphorisms Among the famous personalities who used to attend the Junimea society (1863) and the review Convorbiri literare / Literary Discussions Ŕ translated title (1867) we first remind the five founders: Titu Maiorescu, Vasile Pogor, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Henri H. Stahl's Contribution to the Sociological Monographs of the Bucharest School of Sociology
    UTOPIA CONSTRUCTIVĂ A MONOGRAFIEI HENRI H. STAHL’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE SOCIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS OF THE BUCHAREST SCHOOL OF SOCIOLOGY ALINA JURAVLE* ABSTRACT This study is an attempt to shed light onto Henri H. Stahl’s contribution to the sociological monographs that were the core of the Bucharest School of Sociology’s activity. Stahl is presented as an active member of the School, bringing into it his own background and abilities, distinct or shared views, values and interests and then impacting it through his actions which, combined with other factors, distinctively change and shape its development. As such, the study is also not an attempt to summarize his theoretical developments and to compare and place them in rapport with those of other social scientists. The purpose of this study is to expose at least partially the degree to which the knowledge that Stahl generates and uses differs in shape and contents from that of Dimitrie Gusti, regarding the manner in which it is used in his course towards a certain role and status in the School, the manner in which his course in the School develops, and the manner in which his personal characteristics and options, group and organizational developments and the wider social context interact in order to shape published sociological knowledge. Keywords: Henri H. Stahl, sociological monographs, Bucharest School of Sociology, knowledge. THE SOCIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPH – THEORY, METHOD, PRINTED SCIENTIFIC RESULT The following study is an attempt to shed light onto Henri H. Stahl’s contribution to the sociological monographs that were the core of the Bucharest School of Sociology’s activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Partidele Parlamentare Si Problema Comunismului Intern Si Extern În Adunarea Deputatilor
    PARTIDELE PARLAMENTARE ŞI PROBLEMA COMUNISMULUI INTERN ŞI EXTERN ÎN ADUNAREA DEPUTAŢILOR (1919-1924) La sfârşitul Primului Război Mondial, România se învecina cu Rusia Sovietică, singura ţară comunistă din lume la acea vreme. Între cele două state exista o situaţie tensionată. Relaţiile diplomatice erau întrerupte din ianuarie 1918, iar apartenenţa Basarabiei la statul român era pusă în discuţie de către sovietici. Mai mult, existau temeri referitoare la o posibilă încercare de comunizare forţată a României, cu largul sprijin al Internaţionalei a III-a. „Rusia eternă” a fost percepută nu numai ca un stat ostil, ci şi ca o sursă ideologică pentru socialiştii români 1. În aceste condiţii, comunismul a constituit subiectul multor analize, mai mult sau mai puţin furtunoase, în cadrul opiniei publice româneşti, inclusiv în Parlamentul de la Bucureşti. Apariţia statului bolşevic şi evoluţiile acestuia au fost privite cu interes. Exceptând zvonurile şi speculaţiile, realităţile sovietice au fost cunoscute în România interbelică. Opere ale liderilor bolşevici 2, discursuri ale acestora 3, mărturii ale unor foşti prizonieri întorşi din Rusia Sovietică 4, articole din ziare româneşti şi străine, au constituit suportul multor dezbateri din Adunarea Deputaţilor. Instaurarea regimului bolşevic a stârnit numeroase discuţii în societatea românească, aflată, de asemenea, într-un proces de transformări sociale şi politice. Diferitele cuvântări şi polemici din Cameră reflectă temerile, speranţele opiniei publice româneşti faţă de viitorul său, privit şi prin prisma prefacerilor politice şi sociale din statul vecin de la răsărit. Singurii deputaţi care şi-au exprimat fără echivoc simpatia faţă de Rusia Sovietică au făcut parte din grupul parlamentar socialist. Această grupare politică minusculă, dar foarte activă, încerca să se impună pe scena politică românească, deşi 1 Deputatul Partidului Poporului, D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Redivivus
    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
    [Show full text]
  • Anuarul Institutului De Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” “C.S
    ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 FOUNDING EDITOR: EDITORIAL BOARD: Vladimir OSIAC (University of Craiova, Acad. Dan BERINDEI (Romanian Academy, Romania) Romania); Acad. Dinu C. GIURESCU (Romanian Academy, EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Cezar Gabriel AVRAM (C.S. Nicolăescu- Acad. Victor SPINEI (Romanian Academy, Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies Romania); and Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Nicolae PANEA (University of Craiova, DEPUTY EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Mihaela BĂRBIERU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Lucian DINDIRICĂ (The Alexandru and Aristia Institute for Research in Social Studies and Aman County Library, Romania); Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Simona LAZĂR (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies and INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Patrick CHARLOT (University of Bourgogne, Nicolae MIHAI (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor France); Institute for Research in Social Studies and Shpakovskaya Marina ANATOLIEVNA Humanities, Craiova, Romania); (People’s Friendship University of Russia); Ion MILITARU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Karina Paulina MARCZUK (University of Institute for Research in Social Studies and Warsaw, Poland); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Teodora KALEYNSKA (Sf. Cyril and Sf. Şerban PĂTRAŞCU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Methodius University of VelikoTurnovo, Institute for Research in Social Studies and Bulgaria); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Anatol PETRENCU (Moldova State University, Roxana RADU (University of Craiova, Romania) Chişinău, Moldova); Virgiliu BÎRLĂDEANU (Institute of Social ROMANIAN ACADEMY PUBLISHING History, Chişinău, Moldova) HOUSE EDITORS: Mihaela IAMANDEI Monica STANCIU ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C. S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Bucharest, 2017 Editura Academiei Române, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista De Stiinte Politice Nr.47
    UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES POLITICAL SCIENCES SPECIALIZATION & CENTER OF POST- COMMUNIST POLITICAL STUDIES (CESPO - CEPOS) REVISTA DE ŞTIINȚE POLITICE. REVUE DES SCIENCES POLITIQUES NO. 47 • 2015 1 UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES POLITICAL SCIENCES SPECIALIZATION & CENTER OF POST - COMMUNIST POLITICAL STUDIES (CESPO - CEPOS) Revista de Ştiinţe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques No. 47 • 2015 - EDITORIAL BOARD - Editor in chief: ANCA PARMENA OLIMID Deputy editor in chief: CĂTĂLINA MARIA GEORGESCU Managing editor: COSMIN LUCIAN GHERGHE Regular members: IONUȚ ȘERBAN, GEORGE GÎRLEȘTEANU, DANIEL GHIȚĂ, AUREL PIŢURCĂ, CEZAR AVRAM, VLADIMIR OSIAC, MIRON ROMAN, DAN VALERIU VOINEA, MIHAI COSTESCU, MIHAI GHIȚULESCU, MIHAELA BĂRBIERU, MIHAELA CAMELIA ILIE Technical and online assistance: SPERANȚA PREDOI - INTERNATIONAL ADVISO R Y B O A R D - DAN CLAUDIU DĂNIŞOR JONUZ ABDULLAI Professor, University of Craiova, Faculty of Law and Professor , South East European Social Sciences, Romania University, Tetovo, Macedonia (Chairman of the International Advisory Board) SONJA BUNČIČ MIHAI CIMPOI Professor ,University Union, Faculty of President of the Academy of the Republic of Law, Belgrade, Serbia Moldavia, Moldova HARUN ARIKAN YOHANAN MANOR Professor , Cukurova University, Professor, University of Jerusalem, Israel , Adana,Turkey President , Center for Monitoring the Impact of ALI PAJAZITI Peace (CMIP) Professor , South East European JOZE PIRJEVEC University, Tetovo, Macedonia Professor, University
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics Education in Romanian at Babes-Bolyai University Cluj
    Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 59(2014), No. 4, 399–418 Mathematics education in Romanian at Babe¸s-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca Dorel I. Duca and Adrian Petru¸sel Abstract. In this paper, we will present the most important moments of the evolution and development of the mathematical education and research activities in Romanian at Babe¸s-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca. The main figures of the mathematical university staff are also presented. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 01A72, 01A73, 01A70. Keywords: University of Cluj, Babe¸s-Bolyai University, Faculty of Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics. 1. A short walk through the history of the university education in Cluj On May 12, 1581 the prince S¸tefan Bathory decided to set up at Cluj a college with three faculties: Theology, Philosophy and Law. This is the first official attestation of a higher education institution in our city. After some climbings and descents and a contradictory evolution of the higher education in Cluj, on October 12, 1872 the emperor Ferenc J´ozsef approves a decision of the Hungarian Parliament for setting up the University of Cluj. This Hungarian university have had four faculties: Law and State Sciences, Medicine, Philosophy, Letters and History and, the last one, Mathematics and Natural Sciences. During this period some pre-eminent mathematicians (such as Gyula Farkas, Lip´otFej´er,Frigyes Riesz or Alfr´ed Haar) have had essential contributions to the development of the Cluj mathematical school. The great wish of the Romanian nation to have their own university with com- plete studies in Romanian was finally accomplish after the union of the province of Transylvania with the Romanian principality in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurchescu Ioan (N.1921-Caraş-Severin; D.2008-Timișoara) Interviu Realizat De Roxana Onică 4 Iunie 2003, Timişoara
    Jurchescu Ioan (n.1921-Caraş-Severin; d.2008-Timișoara) Interviu realizat de Roxana Onică 4 iunie 2003, Timişoara Index tematic : Clasa Regelui (Clasa palatină), Regele Carol al II-lea, Regele Mihai I, Zona grănicerească (Banat), Comunitatea de avere, Caransebeș, educaţie (şcoală, colegi), personalități (interbelice) familie, militar, avocat (avocatură), deportare Bărăgan (Frumuşiţa), comunism ( Canal, securitate, închisoare Sighet, procese politice, Timişoara ( Liceul Loga, Corso, echipa de fotbal Ripensia, cofetăria Violeta, primărie) Mitropolit Nicolae (foto), Principesa Margareta ( foto), Memorial Sighet, AFDB IOAN JURCHESCU Ioan Gheorghe Jurchescu s-a născut la 7 august 1921 în satul Petnic, comuna Iablaniţa, judeţul Caraş-Severin. Tatăl său era învățător, iar mama sa țărancă. A urmat primul an de liceu la Colegiul „Diaconovici Loga“ din Timişoara (1932-1933), apoi a fost selecţionat, în urma unui concurs, pentru a reprezenta Banatul în clasa Maiestății Sale Regele Mihai (clasa palatină). A studiat în cadrul clasei palatine din clasa a II-a până într-a VI-a (1933-1938), când a fost nevoit să o părăsească din motive de „reducere bugetară”, continuându-și studiile la Liceul Militar din Târgu-Mureş. Totuşi, nu a urmat o carieră militară, ci una juridică, deveninind avocat şi stabilindu-se în Timişoara. La 18 iunie 1951, a fost deportat în Bărăgan, la Frumuşiţa, împreună cu familia. A executat , conform mărturiei sale, doar 4 luni şi jumătate de domiciliu obligatoriu, din motivele specificate în interviul de faţă. L-a revăzut de mai multe ori pe Maiestatea Sa Regele după întoarcerea acestuia în România, după cum stă mărturie și una dintre fotografiile realizate la Mitroplia Banatului din Timişoara, aferentă interviului.
    [Show full text]
  • Numarul11 Layout 1
    Sorin RADU Universitatea „Lucian Blaga“ din Sibiu, Facultatea de Istorie şi Patrimoniu „Nicolae Lupu“ „Lucian Blaga“ University from Sibiu, „Nicolae Lupu“ Faculty of History and Patrimony Ion Flueraş şi afilierea mişcării socialiste din România la Internaţionala a III-a Comunistă (Partea a II-a)1 Ion Flueraş and the Affiliation of Socialist Movement from Romania at the III-rd Communist International The second part of the article is about the travel of the delegation of the socialist movement in Romania made in Soviet Russia in the fall of 1920, with the specified aim to get information about the Soviet realities and about the conditions for affiliation to the 3rd Communist International.An important number of the socialist leaders in Romania insisted more and more on the affiliation to the Communist International. The leader of the Transylvanian social- democrats, Ion Flueras, was inthat delegation, together with Gheorghe Cristescu, Alexandru Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Eugen Rozvan, Constantin Popovici, David Fabian. The travel to Moscow, full of adventure, was briefly described by Flueras in some notes. The members of the delegation endured some tough critics because of the national position that the socialist movement in Romania, especially that in Transylvania and Bucovina adopted before the Unification. The affiliation to Comintern was accepted with no condition by all members of the delegation but Flueras. In that terms, Flueras was excluded from the delegation and was forced to leave the Soviet Russia. Ion Flueras was the only member of the Romanian socialist delegation that left for Moscow, who expressed a firm and determined attitude for defending the European social-democratic principles and for the Unification on the 1st of December 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY UNITED KINGDOM REFUSED the ECONOMIC HELP for ROMANIA in 1938. NEW DOCUMENTS from BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES George DAMIAN
    Annals of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Series on History and Archeology ON-LINE ISSN 2067-5682 Volume 6, Number 1/2014 79 WHY UNITED KINGDOM REFUSED THE ECONOMIC HELP FOR ROMANIA IN 1938. NEW DOCUMENTS FROM BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES George DAMIAN * Abstract . The topic of British-Romanian economic relations after Munich Agreement was under historians scrutiny for more than half a century and there are still new surfaced documents that allow for a better understanding of UK's Government motivations towards Romania. The present paper presents some new documents on the meetings of King Charles II had in London during his visit (14-17 November 1938) and an unknown project for a close Anglo-Romanian economic cooperation proposed by Miti Ńă Constantinescu, along with the British motivation for rejecting this project. Keywords : United Kingdom, Romania, King Charles II, Miti Ńă Constantinescu, British-Romanian economic cooperation Rezumat . Chestiunea rela Ńiilor economice româno-britanice de dup ă Acordul de la Munchen s-a aflat în aten Ńia istoricilor vreme de mai mult de jum ătate de secol şi totu şi înc ă apar noi documente care permit o mai bun ă în Ńelegere a motivelor care au stat în spatele ac Ńiunilor Guvernului britanic fa Ńă de România. Articolul de fa Ńă prezint ă câteva documente noi referitoare la întâlnirile pe care regele Carol al II-lea le-a avut în timpul vizitei sale la Londra din 14-17 noiembrie 1938, dar şi o propunere necunoscut ă pân ă acum din partea ministrului Miti Ńă Constantinescu pentru o colaborare economic ă strâns ă româno-britanic ă, al ături de motivarea britanic ă pentru respingerea acestui proiect.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicolae Ionescu Şi Contemporanii Săi
    NICOLAE IONESCU ŞI CONTEMPORANII SĂI Nicolae Ionescu (1820-1905) este cunoscut în istoriografie secvenţial şi incomplet, numele său fiind asociat exclusiv statutului de lider al Fracţiunii Libere şi Independente. Reconstituirea firului cronologic al vieţii lui nu este un demers facil, ba mai mult există încă numeroase secvenţe cronologice ce nu pot fi redate decât parţial, în lipsa unor surse care să ofere informaţiile necesare. Nicolae Ionescu apare în postura veşnicului nemulţumit, a insului ce nu poate fi un om al timpurilor sale. La 1857, muntenii cereau un principe străin, el dorea unul pământean. Era adeptul unei politici de neutralitate şi ar fi dorit ca Principatele Române să fie precum „Belgia şi Svizzera”. Profund admirator al modelului englez, părea prea puţin impresionat de modelul francez, deşi a petrecut ani buni la Paris. Singurele descrieri despre primii ani din viaţa lui Nicolae Ionescu aparţin fratelui său, Ion Ionescu de la Brad1, dar acestea se mărginesc la a nara evenimente din copilărie ce nu pot oferi informaţii asupra raporturilor existente între cei doi fraţi. De altfel, informaţiile despre copilăria şi primii ani de şcoală ai lui Nicolae Ionescu sunt limitate. A.D. Xenopol îl identifică pe Nicolae Ionescu ca fiind elev, şi ulterior absolvent, al Academiei Mihăilene fără a oferi informaţii suplimentare asupra modului în care acesta a relaţionat cu colegii sau profesorii săi2. După absolvirea cursurilor Academiei Mihăilene, Nicolae Ionescu pleacă la Paris pentru a studia Dreptul. Despre perioada petrecută acolo se ştiu foarte puţine, dar cert este că acesta nu a reuşit să obţină o diplomă care să-i certifice studiile urmate3.
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Rară În Limba Română Din Colecţiile Bibliotecii
    MINIS TER UL ED UC A ŢIEI AL REPUBLICII MOLDOVA UNIVERSITATEA DE STAT „ALECU RUSSO” DIN BĂLŢ I BIBLIOTECA ŞTIINŢ IF IC Ă Carte rară în limba română din colecţiile bibliotecii Contribuţii bibliografice Fascicula 2 Bălţi, 2003 CZU 016 C 27 Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Carte rară în limba română din colecţiile b ib liotec ii: contr ibuţii b ib liogra f ice / Alcăt.: E.Scurtu, A.Nagherneac, V.Secrieru; Red. resp. E.Harconiţă. – Bălţi, 2003. –120 p. ISBN 9975-931-34-0 016 C 27 Echipa de lucru: Alcătuitori: Elena Sc urt u Ana Nagherneac Vas ile Se crie ru Culegere computerizată: Ana Nagherneac Natalia Apos tol Machetare computerizată: Iurie Pogrebneac Maria Fotescu ISBN 9975-931-34-0 2 NO TA REDACŢIEI Aceste contribuţi i b ib l io g r a f ic e îşi propun să înregistreze publicaţiile în lim ba roman ă din secolele 19 –20, aflate în colecţia d e carte rară a Bib liotec ii Universitare din Bă lţi. În acest scop au fost cerc etate de –v izu 202 cărţi, c are au constituit obiecte de studiu la întocmirea luc rării. Fascicula a II-a (prima apăru tă în anul 2 000 cu 18 6 d e titluri ad no tate) cu prinde pu blic aţii de orientare psihologică, filozofică, religioasă, sociologică, pedagogică, lingvistică, literatură şi is to r ie . Alătu ri de m ulte lu crări reprezentative menţio n ăm Anastasimatariu cuprinded serviciile de Sîmbătă seara şi Duminică dimineaţa puse pe cele 8 glasuri întrebuinţate în Biserica Orthodoxă Română, prelucrată de un grup de muzicieni, împreună cu Gavriil Mus ic escu , eminent al c ultu rii muzicale romaneşti din a II-a jumătate a secolului XIX – începutul sec.
    [Show full text]