DOCSLIB.ORG

U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 33– July 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 33– July 2006 U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 33– July 2006 U.E.F. NEWSLETTER in charge and of the Austrian federalist N° 33 activists. I would like to thank them for all their work and efforts. Thanks also go to the team from Brussels, which prepared and INDEX: managed the dissemination of the practical and political information that contributed so 1. FOREWORD by Michel Morin much to the success of these events, and both of these reflect the current strength of our 2. SECOND EUROPEAN CITIZENS’ supranational organisation. CONVENTION This Newsletter is devoted mainly to what 3. XXI UEF CONGRESS took place during the Convention and the Congress. The key question is, is it possible 4. OTHER PAST EVENTS for everyone to endorse the plans and Marienberg Talks on European Unity conclusions which were discussed and 60 years of Europa Union in Hessen adopted to engage in the new federalist JEF International Summer University campaign? I would like this foreword to be a Europa Forum Neumarkt testimony. As a new member of the European Bureau, I will try, for the moment, to maintain 5. NEW UEF BUREAU an objective point of view on what may appear banal and familiar to experienced 6. FUTURE EVENTS militants. rd 23 International Seminar, Ventotene 60 years of European federalism, In my opinion, when European citizens and Hertenstein, Switzerland federalist militants meet together to discuss Two day seminar on the future of and reflect, democracy in Europe moves Europe, Besançon, France forward. The construction of the European Union with all its contradictions and the move 7. PRESS RELEASES towards a federal state with its ensuing New UEF Campaign: A European engagements quite obviously do not stop at referendum for a European Constitution the doors of a Congress of the UEF! But Second European Citizens’ Convention without being too self-centred or too self- G8: Putin-hugging instead of tough satisfied, I believe that we can regard our demands work as laying down values and hope for the years to come. 8. NEWS FROM THE SECRETARIAT First of all, one constant characterises the 9. CALENDAR OF ACTIVITIES Congress. All the policy guidelines call upon the expression of European citizens. Some members wanted to make the further 1. FOREWORD BY MICHEL MORIN ratifications of the ECT a priority, for others the priority was the mobilisation of the citizens of the most integrated states and for For three days, the University of Vienna others it was a radical referendum. The hosted the 2nd Convention of European majority wanted to fight for a European Citizens and the 21st supranational Congress referendum in 2009, prolonging the lengthy of the UEF, and during this time interesting step from the Convention to the process of and productive meetings and activities took ratification of the ECT in all countries. We place, thanks to the commitment of the people UEF 214 D Chaussée de Wavre, B-1050 Brussels Tel. +32 2 508 30 30, Fax. +32 2 626 95 01 Page 1 of 20 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.federaleurope.org U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 33– July 2006 remain thus an organisation which sees the and the strategic choices to be made. emergence of a European citizenship and the Following the discussions and the debates, a reinforcement of European democracy as vast majority finally emerged for the adoption being fundamental. There is also a common of the General Resolution on the Political confidence in the collective power of the Strategy and this majority was also in favour people of Europe, which, whilst richly diverse of the other motions. This process are nonetheless engaged in the same demonstrates that we are able reconcile a democratic model. Not an original concept for radical outlook with a commitment to us perhaps, but, seen from the outside, one transform what exists in reality. History never that makes the federalists the "ultra- turns out exactly as planned. This is as true of democrats" of European construction, and this Europe as it of anywhere else, and, because is a strong common point for us all, going all of us are determined to move towards a beyond any strategic differences. federal European state, we will be all the more able to work together to face In the debates themselves, the Congress once tomorrow’s challenges. again focused on the supranational dimension of our organisation: the ideas, the strategies, Please follow this link to read the original the debates and the alliances formed beyond French version of the foreword: national memberships. Of course, the size of http://www.federaleurope.org/fileadmin/files_ each member organisation determines its uef/PREFACEMMorin.doc respective power and influence but, within each representation, the ideas and the proposals overrode purely national 2. SECOND EUROPEAN CITIZENS’ considerations. CONVENTION The realities of the external world permeated the walls of the old university to influence the strategic options and reflections. Everyone is now fully aware that complexity is an essential characteristic of the construction of the Union and also the route towards the federal Europe that we want. This is not new. Thus the importance of the European On Thursday 28 and Friday 29 June the authorities obliges federalists to continually Second European Citizens’ Convention took analyse their evolution and to take account of place in Vienna (Austria). The Convention their realities, but without simply tagging was organized jointly by UEF Austria, JEF along behind either the European institutions Austria and UEF supranational. or governmental policies. On the other hand, there is a danger of getting locked into an It was a great success, as it gathered over 200 idealised project, which could be defined participants from all over Europe, of all ages. without taking account of all the Members of the European Parliament and of contingencies. national Parliaments, representatives of Civil Society and general public convened to The complexity has increased during recent discuss the current situation of Europe and the years because of the widening of the Union challenges of the future, and to relaunch the and the ratification of the ECT. These two European constitutional process. factors impacted on, and will continue for the foreseeable future to impact on, the debates UEF 214 D Chaussée de Wavre, B-1050 Brussels Tel. +32 2 508 30 30, Fax. +32 2 626 95 01 Page 2 of 20 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.federaleurope.org U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 33– July 2006 Key note speech by Didier DONFUT, Mr. Donfut stressed the importance of a joint Belgian State Secretary for European preparation of the EU’s Spring Summit and Affairs meetings gathering the 12 ministers for Employment, Social Affairs and Research. Mr. Donfut expressed his concern with the The reinforcement of the Eurogroup was crisis which Europe is now facing, in terms of necessary, as the Lisbon Strategy was not citizens’ discontent and defection from the totally adequate, especially in terms of the original European project. He stated that one method adopted (“open method of of the biggest problems which were slowing coordination”). down the European process is the Euroscepticism about the possibility of All this should be realized as soon as possible, building a common European feeling in since Europe is rapidly loosing ground and countries which are culturally and politically credibility. The goal should be a competitive very different. However, this diversity is a Europe towards the rest of the world, and not potentially enriching asset that Europe should a Europe where Member States are in cultivate as a lesson of experience. So, the competition. problem was not the diversity, but the difficulty of finding a common great vision To read the speech, please click here: that could embody the integration. http://www.federaleurope.org/fileadmin/files_ uef/speech_DDvienne290606_FMonier.doc Mr. Donfut then expressed his support of the idea of allowing a group of Member States, To read a summary paper of Guy sharing an integrated and coherent political Verhofstadt’s main points, please click here: goal, to form a core group, while the rest of http://www.federaleurope.org/fileadmin/files_ the enlarged Union should continue to ensure uef/verhofstadt.doc peace and security for our continent without paralyzing the process of deepening the Union. This “core group” would be The Workshops progressively joined by the countries which are able to make the necessary efforts. It On Friday morning, the Convention was should not be a “private club”, but it should divided into 4 Workshops, discussing the act as a driving force attracting other following topics: “A European Government countries and convincing them that intense for the Economy?”, “Which Social Model for cooperation is more efficient. Europe?”, “The Young Generation: How to Fully Engage Europe’s Human Potential?”, He expressed his unconditional support to the “European External Action: Europe as a book of Belgian Prime Minister Guy Power for Peace?”. Verhofstadt “The United States of Europe”, as well as to the speech given by the latter at the Workshop 1: “A European Government European Parliament. First of all the for the Economy?” was moderated by importance of a new European socio- Alfonso IOZZO. Pat COX, President of the economic governance, focused on the Euro European Movement International, and area should be stressed. Then, the Eurogroup former President of the European Parliament should be reinforced and become the real was the guest speaker. pillar of the socio-economic governance; however there should be concrete plans in Pat Cox outlined the undeniable achievements order to realize the Eurogroup reinforcement. of the EU. Yet, Europe was going through a Among the proposals of the Prime Minister, severer confidence crisis in which the “avant- UEF 214 D Chaussée de Wavre, B-1050 Brussels Tel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our European Future OUR EUROPEAN
    Our European Future European Our OUR EUROPEAN ChartingFUTURE a Progressive Course in the World Ideas contributed by László Andor, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, François Balate, Peter Bofinger, Tanja A. Börzel, Mercedes Bresso, Stefan Collignon, Olivier Costa, Emma Dowling, Saïd El Khadraoui, Gerda Falkner, Georg Fischer, Diego Lopez Garrido, Hedwig Giusto, Giovanni Grevi, Ulrike Guérot, Paolo Guerrieri, Lukas Hochscheidt, Robin Huguenot-Noël, Guillaume Klossa, Halliki Kreinin, Michael A. Landesmann, Jean-François Lebrun, Jo Leinen, Lora Lyubenova, Justin Nogarede, Vassilis Ntousas, Alvaro Oleart, Carlota Perez, David Rinaldi, Barbara Roggeveen, Vivien A. Schmidt, Ania Skrzypek, Mario Telò and Britta Thomsen edited by Maria João Rodrigues OUR EUROPEAN FUTURE The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) is the think tank of the progressive political family at EU level. Our mission is to develop innovative research, policy advice, training and debates to inspire and inform progressive politics and policies across Europe. We operate as hub for thinking to facilitate the emergence of progressive answers to the chal- lenges that Europe faces today. FEPS works in close partnership with its members and partners, forging connections and boosting coherence among stakeholders from the world of politics, academia and civil society at local, regional, national, European and global levels. Today FEPS benefits from a solid network of 68 member organisations. Among these, 43 are full members, 20 have observer status and 5 are ex-of- ficio members. In addition to this network of organisations that are active in the promotion of progressive values, FEPS also has an extensive network of partners, including renowned universities, scholars, policymakers and activists. Our ambition is to undertake intellectual reflection for the benefit of the progressive movement, and to promote the founding principles of the EU – freedom, equality, solidarity, democracy, respect of human rights, funda- mental freedoms and human dignity, and respect of the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Mercedes Bresso
    Mercedes Bresso Mercedes Bresso, President of the Committee of the Regions Member of Piedmont Regional Council Born 12 July 1944 in San Remo, in the province of Imperia (Italy) Married Education Doctorate in economics and commerce Career Since 1973 University lecturer in economic institutions, most recently at Turin Polytechnic University, specialising in environmental economics 1985 - 1995 Member of Piedmont Regional Council 1995 – 2004 President of the Province of Turin 1998 – 2004 Member of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) and the CoR Bureau 2000 – 2004 President of the World Federation of United Cities (FMCU) 2000 – 2004 President of the Franco-Italian Alps Conference Association (CAFI) 2000 – 2004 President of the Network of European Metropolitan Regions and Areas (METREX) In 2004 Founding President of United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) 2004 - 2005 Member of the European Parliament 2005 – 2008 President of the European Union of Federalists (EUF) 2005 – 2010 President of Piedmont Region Since 2005 Member of the Committee of the Regions Since 2006 President of the Italian Association for the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (IACMER) and Vice-president of the CMER In 2006 Co-founder of the Alps-Mediterranean Euroregion (Piedmont, Liguria, Aoste Valley, Rhône-Alpes and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur) 2006 - 2010 President of the PES Group at the Committee of the Regions 2007 - 2009 President of the Mediterranean Commission of the UCLG In 2009 President of the Conference of Presidents of Regions with Legislative Powers (REGLEG) Since 2009 President of the Association of Elected Representatives from Mountainous Areas (AEM) Since 2009 Representative of the Mediterranean Commission of the UCLG at the Euro- Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM) Distinctions 1996 Awarded the medal of the Grand Officer of the Italian Republic EN.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiated Integration, Reconsidered
    Policy Paper Centre international Note de recherche de formation européenne CIFE Policy Paper n°50 Hartmut Marhold*, March 3rd , 2017 Differentiated Integration, Reconsidered A new U-turn to multi-speed Europe The dilemma – pros and cons "The history of recent years has shown that there The challenge is obvious and is openly addressed in will be a multi-speed EU, and not all members will all of the three reports on EU reform 5 voted by the participate in the same steps of integration," said European Parliament on the 22 nd February. One of Angela Merkel after the informal EU-Summit at these introduced by the Committee on Constitution- Valetta/Malta, 3 February 2017 – “ it was the first al Affairs, chaired by Mercedes Bresso and Elmar time that Merkel clearly claimed this old idea as her Brok, outlines the problem: “The European Union own.” 1 It amounts to a U-turn in Merkel’s EU-inte- and its Member States are facing unprecedented gration strategy; until now, she has, in fact, pinned challenges, such as the refugee crisis, the foreign all her hopes on advancing towards tighter and policy challenges in the immediate neighbourhood tougher integration with all the – 27! – Member and the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisa- States of the Union. She is not the only one to tion, climate change, demographic developments, switch from a one-fits-all approach to differentiat- unemployment, the causes and consequences of the ed integration: François Hollande agreed as much financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness on the idea 2 at the same time as the Italian govern- and the social consequences in several Member ment, and the three Benelux-countries went as far States, and the need to reinforce the EU internal as to publish an official statement on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • U.E.F. NEWSLETTER No. 23
    U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 23 - May 2005 U.E.F. NEWSLETTER 1. FOREWORD BY MERCEDES BRESSO, No. 23 - May 2005 UEF PRESIDENT Europe is facing new and fundamental INDEX: choices: the ratification of the European Constitution has revamped a row of questions 1. FOREWORD by Mercedes BRESSO, and doubts to be confronted such as: President of UEF Which kind of Europe do we want? What are 2. FUTURE ACTIVITIES: the values and perspectives of the new • Seminar in Sofia about enlargement Europe? Do we need more market • UEF enlarged Bureau meeting (including deregulation or more social cohesion? Are the Presidents, Secretary-Generals and we ready for a single European political Treasurers of UEF constituent orgs) economy? Can Europe sustain further • Seminar in Bad Marienberg about the enlargement? European Constitution The debate over ratification in France is 3. PAST ACTIVITIES: important for all of us because for the first • Open door day in the European time European citizens face themselves and Institutions in Brussels they divide over Europe’s future on topical political issues, such as political economy, • Events and actions organised by UEF civil liberties and foreign policy. France for the OUI • Seminar in Bardoneccia about Debate over Europe now reverberates the enlargement and the Constitution fear of social dumping expressed by the left • UEF Federal Committee meeting and wing supporters of the NO, or on the other extraordinary European Congress hand of the political spectrum the nationalistic instinct of the right wing that 4. NEWS FROM UEF SECRETARIAT does not want Turkey in Europe. 5. NEWS FROM UEF MEMBER Those who support the ratification hold ORGANISATIONS better arguments: the Constitution is a • Council of Members of NOMES/NEBS framework for regulation and not a call for a (UEF Switzerland) liberalistic “free for all” market.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening of Economic Competition and Regulatory Improvement for Competitiveness in Mexico
    Strengthening of Economic Competition and Regulatory Improvement for Competitiveness in Mexico Case Study on Piemonte, Italy1 Successful Practices and Policies to Promote Regulatory Reform and Entrepreneurship 1. This case study was prepared for the OECD by Mario Calderini, President of Finpiemonte. 1 1. BROAD DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 1.1 GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE ECONOMY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES Piemonte is one of the 20 Regions of Italy; located in the North West part of the country, close to the French and Swiss border, it has an area of 25,399 km2 and a population of about 4.4 million people. Its capital, Torino, is at the centre of the regional economic activities and has been affected by important economic and industrial processes since the 19th century. In particular, the most renowned Italian automobile company, FIAT, set its headquarters and started its rapid growth in Torino in 1899; although the FIAT Group is now a diversified multinational company, it still has its headquarters in Torino. More specifically, after the Second World War, FIAT ascent lead the development of the national car industry and its presence led to the establishment of a Fordist productive paradigm that deeply influenced the regional economy and society. This paradigm was based on the existence of a few vertically integrated big plants (just to quote some of them: FIAT Lingotto and Mirafiori) characterized by industrial mass production processes, metal- mechanic technology, and the formation of a huge localized supply system, called “indotto”, made of thousands of small and medium enterprises providing components and services to the big companies.
    [Show full text]
  • When National Or Local? the Dual Climate of Opinion in the Italian Regional Elections
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 2, No. 2, 2010, 55-74 When National or Local? The Dual Climate of Opinion in the Italian Regional Elections Marinella Belluati University of Turin Abstract: Local elections in Italy have, for some time, been closely analysed because their importance in the electoral cycle has been heightened by voting-system changes that have increased the significance of sub-national levels of government. The regional elections of 2010, here examined in terms of the way they were covered in Italian national daily newspapers were, however, subject to media discussion that was dominated entirely by national issues, which obscured local issues and parties, and relegated to the background what was really at stake in these contests. The aim of this article is to verify empirically the existence in Italy of a state of permanent campaigning supported by news coverage which tends mainly to concern itself with the affairs, public and private, of Silvio Berlusconi and his governing majority. However, local politics have continued, in a less obvious but significant way, to structure the climate of opinion. Keywords: local election, climate of opinion, media coverage, local dimension For almost twenty years in Italy the traditional political parties have been undergoing a profound crisis caused by internal structural changes but also by changes in the relationship between politics and society. Against this background local politics have often furnished evidence of a growing political and social significance (Bauman, 2003) and shown an autonomous potential to determine which issues and actors dominate the political agenda. In 1995, a reform of the electoral law for regional elections 1 initiated a gradual process of transfer of competences and functions from the central state to sub-national levels (De Luca, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Comune Candelo Conferenza
    European Conference, Part III: October 25, 2008 “Cultural Heritage in Europe; a chance for the dialogue”Candelo - Polyvalent Hall – Inner City 10.00 Registration of Participants 10:15 Opening of the Conference European Commission Working Session 5: European Active Citizenship and the “Europe for Citizens” Programme TOWN TWINNING - GEMELLAGGIO Moderator: Giovanni Chilà – Candelo Municipality Vice-Mayor – Responsible of Urban Sector Town Twinning event On. Gianluca Susta - European Parliament Europe for Citizens Programme - Misure On. Gilberto Pichetto - Senator On. Roberto Simonetti – Italian Parliament 1.2 – Thematic Networking of Twinned representative (?) and Province of Biella adviser Towns Louis Caulfuty, Municipality of La Roche sur Foron Maria Isabel Martinez Parrilla – Employment and “ E.C.H.O.” Development Agent for the Comarca Campo de “European Cultural Heritage is ON ” Belchite CONFERENCE Jarosław Nowak , City Councillor and director of the Job Center - Municipality of Starachowice 11:30 OFFICIAL SIGNATURE OF TOWN TWINNING 23 - 24 - 25 October 2008 OATH Polyvalent Hall – Inner City Interventions by: Gabriella Bigatti – Administrator of the Italian Agency eConsulenza and President of Italian Association of European Projects Planners Info: “AProCom”: presentation of the European Secretary of the Municipality of Candelo (Biella): Programme “Europe for Citizens” Tel: +39 015 2534118 Fax: +39 015 2534112 Gregorio Jalle Rupérez - Mayor of Almonacid de la Email [email protected] Cuba Municipality (ES)
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fitness of Italian Regions
    ISSN: 2036-5438 The European fitness of Italian Regions by Paolo Bilancia, Francesco Palermo, Ornella Porchia Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 2, issue 2, 2010 E- 1 Abstract What impact did Europeanization have on the governmental capacity of Italian regions? Are the regions successful in addressing the challenges and the opportunities of European integration? Is the participation in the EU a driving factor for decentralization in Italy? The paper, which reproduces a study commissioned by the Bertelsmann Foundation and the Compagnia di San Paolo, provides some answers to these questions. It is argued that the "European fitness" of Italian regions is highly asymmetric and so is their responsiveness to the challenges of multilevel governance. Moreover, while Italian regions have overall benefitted from the opportunities of European integration, there is still much to do in terms of institutional capacity, especially due to the overly complex system of intergovernmental relations. Key-words: Italy, Regionalism, European Union, Intergovernmental Relations, Decentralization, Europeanization E- 123 1. Background of the national debate on territorial politics and recent changes The territorial design provided by the Italian Constitution is marked by a high degree of decentralization and is best described as “polycentric” rather than as a proper federal system. Italy was the first country to experiment with devolutionary asymmetry. After World War II, the establishment of a strong subnational level of government was inevitable in at least five territories: Trentino-Alto Adige (Trentino-South Tyrol), Valle d’Aosta (Aosta Valley), Friuli-Venezia Giulia (three relatively small alpine regioni (regions) with a relatively substantial population of ethnic minorities), Sicilia (Sicily) and Sardegna (Sardinia).
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal for Europe-The European Civil Society Meets the European Parliament
    DOI: 10.1515/tfd-2016-0022 THE FEDERALIST DEBATE Year XXIX, N° 2, July 2016 Federalist Action New Deal for Europe-The European Civil Society Meets the European Parliament Presentation of the NewDeal4Europe (ND4E) Petition - A European Special Plan for Sustainable Development and Employment - Brussels, 15 March 2016 New Deal 4 Europe – European Committee The meeting was opened by Jo Leinen, support to the Petition, as well as the Group of President of the European Movement European Greens. The Spanish, Italian, French International, MEP and member of the and Belgian representatives stressed the gravity Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO), of the conditions of the workers and the young who highlighted the difficulties in the path unemployed or underemployed, and those of towards a democratic and federal Europe, the immigrants, and the urgency that sizable and the importance that initiatives of the civil resources and investments be earmarked for society, such as the ND4E, can represent for the creation of new and stable jobs. All the pushing Europe to face its responsibility. Lucio Organizations, each with regard to the values Levi, proponent and first signatory of the and goals they are pursuing, reaffirmed the Petition, read out the message of support to the proposals contained in the Petition, all of them ND4E by the President Emeritus of the Republic closely connected to the serious social and of Italy Giorgio Napolitano; he then illustrated environmental problems ensuing from the the Petition’s objectives and underlined democratic deficit of the present-day European the dangers of a situation where citizens Union. The necessity was unanimously are detached from European institutions, asserted for the European Parliament to regain and the urgency for the latter to respond the role of initiative it is expected to perform.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Cooperation
    .19 # 1 MARCH 2019 Enhancing ‘Enhanced Cooperation’: constraints and opportuni- ties of an inflexible flexibility clause Carsten Gerards and Wolfgang Wessels between 1999 and 2010 but repeated instances of differenti- Executive Summary ated institution-building outside the Treaties (e.g. Fiscal Com- pact) since the financial and sovereign debt crisis, the de facto > In the framework of Enhanced Cooperation in the impact of this promise must be called into question. Moreover, EU less than a handful of policy projects have been the implementation of Permanent Structured Cooperation realised so far. (PESCO) in defence projects in 2017 – an additional, single-topic > Procedural and substantive bottlenecks in the rel- Treaty framework allowing for subgroup integration – has re- evant Treaty provisions streamline the frame- cently overshadowed debates on differentiated integration in the EU. work’s application towards special legislative pro- cedure in the area of Justice and Home Affairs. Against this backdrop, this policy brief evaluates the EnC by, > The framework can substantially be improved by: first, providing a brief introduction to the subject before pre- senting three core insights from the analysis of the legal provi- > changing the incentive structure that Enhanced Co- sions governing EnC since the Lisbon Treaty, particularly focus- operation is embedded in; sing on the role of the European Parliament. Subsequently, > reducing the complexity in the realm of ‘subgroup three lessons regarding the cases of EnC ‘realised’ so far will be integration’ in the EU (especially by integrating outlined. Finally, these insights will be condensed in three pol- PESCO into the Enhanced Cooperation frame- icy recommendations with the aim to facilitate and improve the work); future use of EnC in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Press Release
    35th EU-Switzerland Inter-parliamentary Meeting Strasbourg, 23 and 24 November 2016 JOINT PRESS RELEASE by the Chairpersons of the Delegations: Thomas Aeschi (National Council, Switzerland) and Jørn Dohrmann (European Parliament) The delegations responsible for EU-Switzerland relations from the Swiss Federal Assembly and the European Parliament met in Strasbourg on 23 and 24 November. Talks at the 35th inter-parliamentary annual meeting focused on the institutional framework for EU-Switzer- land relations, the free movement of persons, migration (Schengen/Dublin) and cross-border cooperation for combating terrorism. Delegations further exchanged views about the benefits of free trade agreements. Under the co-chairmanship of National Council member Thomas Aeschi (SVP/ZG) and MEP Jørn Dohrmann (ECR, Denmark), the members of the two delegations discussed the state of bilateral relations and of the ongoing talks concerning institutional issues in connection with the bilateral agreements with Mr Claude Maerten, Head of the Western Europe Division of the European External Action Service, and Ambassador Urs Bucher, Head of the Swiss Mission to the EU in Brussels. The chairs of the two delegations, National Council member Thomas Aeschi and MEP Jørn Dohrmann, agreed that the bilateral path remains the best instrument for maintaining well-functioning relations between Switzer- land and the EU, traditionally based on close partnership. It was in this context that the ongoing deliberations regarding implementation of the mass immigration initiative were addressed. A further topic of discussion during the inter-parliamentary meeting was the high number of irregular entries into the Schengen area. Representatives from both delegations spoke in favour of better enforcing Schengen’s external border control with the aim of increasing security within the Schengen area so as to be able to continue to safeguard the freedom of movement.
    [Show full text]