DOCSLIB.ORG

New Deal for Europe-The European Civil Society Meets the European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Deal for Europe-The European Civil Society Meets the European Parliament DOI: 10.1515/tfd-2016-0022 THE FEDERALIST DEBATE Year XXIX, N° 2, July 2016 Federalist Action New Deal for Europe-The European Civil Society Meets the European Parliament Presentation of the NewDeal4Europe (ND4E) Petition - A European Special Plan for Sustainable Development and Employment - Brussels, 15 March 2016 New Deal 4 Europe – European Committee The meeting was opened by Jo Leinen, support to the Petition, as well as the Group of President of the European Movement European Greens. The Spanish, Italian, French International, MEP and member of the and Belgian representatives stressed the gravity Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO), of the conditions of the workers and the young who highlighted the difficulties in the path unemployed or underemployed, and those of towards a democratic and federal Europe, the immigrants, and the urgency that sizable and the importance that initiatives of the civil resources and investments be earmarked for society, such as the ND4E, can represent for the creation of new and stable jobs. All the pushing Europe to face its responsibility. Lucio Organizations, each with regard to the values Levi, proponent and first signatory of the and goals they are pursuing, reaffirmed the Petition, read out the message of support to the proposals contained in the Petition, all of them ND4E by the President Emeritus of the Republic closely connected to the serious social and of Italy Giorgio Napolitano; he then illustrated environmental problems ensuing from the the Petition’s objectives and underlined democratic deficit of the present-day European the dangers of a situation where citizens Union. The necessity was unanimously are detached from European institutions, asserted for the European Parliament to regain and the urgency for the latter to respond the role of initiative it is expected to perform. with immediate decisions to the problems besetting the citizens. The first Member of The members of the ND4E’s European the European Parliament to speak was Gianni Committee Jean Francis Billion (France) and Pittella, President of the Socialists&Democrats Domenec Devesa (Spain), Francesco Franco Group. Pittella underlined the importance of (Belgium), Catherine Vieilledent (UEF-Groupe the meeting held at the European Parliament Europe), spoke about the Petition. The meeting between Spanish, Italian, French and German was closed by the MEP Juan Fernando López social militants and the MEPs, which testifies Aguilar and by the representative of the Italian to the MEPs’ commitment to pursue the Committee Paolo Ponzano. Aguilar went into proposals submitted with the ND4E petition. detail about the Petition’s proposals and said he is committed to continue to support them. There followed the speeches of the Ponzano stated that the next months will be representatives of the ND4E promoting decisive for what concerns the increase of the Organizations and of the MEPs. Many people EU budget’s own resources. The Monti Report participated (see Attachment) and many on the increase of the EU own resources will proposals were put forward. The European be presented to the Commission before the trade union confederation CES-ETUC gave its summer. Should the European Parliament 51 miss the opportunity of the review of the necessary. The European citizens and the Multiannual Financial Framework for asking Organizations representing them who for the creation of new own resources, presented the ND4E Petition will watch over everything will be postponed to 2020/2021, but those who have to take decisions, ready to it could be too late for regaining the citizens’ act, if necessary, in order to bring about the consensus to the European project. objectives promoted by the Campaign New Deal for Europe. The negative signs coming from a part of the The Bruxelles meeting’s video recording is public opinion are worrying. Europe can no available on the ND4E’s Youtube channel at longer ignore the social, environmental and the following address: http://tinyurl.com/ security-related problems that are threatening ND4E-Assembly-15032016. All the news can us, and make Europe’s initiative for the be found in the next newsletter and in the development and peace in the Mediterranean website www.newdeal4europe.eu ATTACHMENT LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Mercedes Bresso, MEP S&D Italy Elly Schlein, MEP S&D Italy 1) Organizations which made a speech Renata Briano, MEP S&D Italy Jo Leinen President of the European Movement Barbara Spinelli, MEP GUE Italy International, MEP, member of the Commitee on Brando Benifei, MEP S&D Italy Contitutional Affairs (AFCO), Welcome Address and Juan Fernando López Aguilar, MEP S&D Spain Chairmanship of the meeting Georgi Pirinski, MEP S&D Bulgaria Lucio Levi, First Signatory of the ND4E Petition, Editor of MEPs present who did not make a speech The Federalist Debate, Member MFE,UEF,WFM Margrete Auken, Green Party Mariano Fandos, Secrétaire confédéral, Confédération Alessia Mosca, MEP S&D française démocratique du travail Assistants to supporting MEPs engaged in coincident Wolfgang G. Wettach, German Green Party, UEF- institutional meetings who confirmed their support Germany Mariano Zosi, assistant to Danuta Hubner MEP PPE Silvana Roseto, CGIL-CISL-UIL Trade unions - Italy Anita Banfi, assistant to Patrizia Toia MEP S&D Claude Denagtergal, ETUC Advisor Assistant to Daniele Viotti Isabel Caño, Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) Regina Dworschak, assistant to Joachim Schuster S&D Georges Vlandas, President of U4U Assistant to Ernst Margall, Greens Party- EFA Group Nicole Fondeneige, Pacte civique Assistant to Ernest Urtasun, Greens Party- EFA Group Mauro Albrizio, Legambiente Gerard Venier Sauvon l’Europe 3) Members of the European Committee Emanuele Caminada Coordinator German ND4E Catherine Vieilledent, General Secretary, Groupe Europe Committee Jean-Francis Billion, Coordinator French Committee Urbano Tocci La Rosa Bianca ND4E, Comité directeur UEF-France Organizations present which did not make a speech Domènec Devesa, Vice-President UEF-Spain, Spanish Giuseppe Gulia, General Secretary, Federation ACLI ND4E Committee International Francesco Franco, Belgian ND4ECommittee Stefano Milia, Italian Council of European Movement (CIME) 4) Supporters and MEPs who excused themselves for Cinzia Delrio, UIL Iternational their absence Emma Klever, European Movement International Raffaella Bolini, Responsible for international relations of Bruno Boissière, CIFE ARCI Bernard Snoy, ELEC-LECE Sylvie Goulard, MEP ALDE Pietro Emili, Directeur Maison du Peuple d’Europe. Simone Fissolo, President Gioventù Federalista Europea (GFE-Italia) 2) MEPs who made a speech Pierre-Jean Coulon, Confédération Française Travailleurs Gianni Pittella, President of the Socialists&Democrats Chrétiens Group in the European Parliament Soledad Cabezón, MEP S&D Spain Jo Leinen, MEP S&D Germany Florent Banfi, President UEF- France 52 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our European Future OUR EUROPEAN
    Our European Future European Our OUR EUROPEAN ChartingFUTURE a Progressive Course in the World Ideas contributed by László Andor, Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, François Balate, Peter Bofinger, Tanja A. Börzel, Mercedes Bresso, Stefan Collignon, Olivier Costa, Emma Dowling, Saïd El Khadraoui, Gerda Falkner, Georg Fischer, Diego Lopez Garrido, Hedwig Giusto, Giovanni Grevi, Ulrike Guérot, Paolo Guerrieri, Lukas Hochscheidt, Robin Huguenot-Noël, Guillaume Klossa, Halliki Kreinin, Michael A. Landesmann, Jean-François Lebrun, Jo Leinen, Lora Lyubenova, Justin Nogarede, Vassilis Ntousas, Alvaro Oleart, Carlota Perez, David Rinaldi, Barbara Roggeveen, Vivien A. Schmidt, Ania Skrzypek, Mario Telò and Britta Thomsen edited by Maria João Rodrigues OUR EUROPEAN FUTURE The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) is the think tank of the progressive political family at EU level. Our mission is to develop innovative research, policy advice, training and debates to inspire and inform progressive politics and policies across Europe. We operate as hub for thinking to facilitate the emergence of progressive answers to the chal- lenges that Europe faces today. FEPS works in close partnership with its members and partners, forging connections and boosting coherence among stakeholders from the world of politics, academia and civil society at local, regional, national, European and global levels. Today FEPS benefits from a solid network of 68 member organisations. Among these, 43 are full members, 20 have observer status and 5 are ex-of- ficio members. In addition to this network of organisations that are active in the promotion of progressive values, FEPS also has an extensive network of partners, including renowned universities, scholars, policymakers and activists. Our ambition is to undertake intellectual reflection for the benefit of the progressive movement, and to promote the founding principles of the EU – freedom, equality, solidarity, democracy, respect of human rights, funda- mental freedoms and human dignity, and respect of the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Mercedes Bresso
    Mercedes Bresso Mercedes Bresso, President of the Committee of the Regions Member of Piedmont Regional Council Born 12 July 1944 in San Remo, in the province of Imperia (Italy) Married Education Doctorate in economics and commerce Career Since 1973 University lecturer in economic institutions, most recently at Turin Polytechnic University, specialising in environmental economics 1985 - 1995 Member of Piedmont Regional Council 1995 – 2004 President of the Province of Turin 1998 – 2004 Member of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) and the CoR Bureau 2000 – 2004 President of the World Federation of United Cities (FMCU) 2000 – 2004 President of the Franco-Italian Alps Conference Association (CAFI) 2000 – 2004 President of the Network of European Metropolitan Regions and Areas (METREX) In 2004 Founding President of United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) 2004 - 2005 Member of the European Parliament 2005 – 2008 President of the European Union of Federalists (EUF) 2005 – 2010 President of Piedmont Region Since 2005 Member of the Committee of the Regions Since 2006 President of the Italian Association for the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (IACMER) and Vice-president of the CMER In 2006 Co-founder of the Alps-Mediterranean Euroregion (Piedmont, Liguria, Aoste Valley, Rhône-Alpes and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur) 2006 - 2010 President of the PES Group at the Committee of the Regions 2007 - 2009 President of the Mediterranean Commission of the UCLG In 2009 President of the Conference of Presidents of Regions with Legislative Powers (REGLEG) Since 2009 President of the Association of Elected Representatives from Mountainous Areas (AEM) Since 2009 Representative of the Mediterranean Commission of the UCLG at the Euro- Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM) Distinctions 1996 Awarded the medal of the Grand Officer of the Italian Republic EN.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiated Integration, Reconsidered
    Policy Paper Centre international Note de recherche de formation européenne CIFE Policy Paper n°50 Hartmut Marhold*, March 3rd , 2017 Differentiated Integration, Reconsidered A new U-turn to multi-speed Europe The dilemma – pros and cons "The history of recent years has shown that there The challenge is obvious and is openly addressed in will be a multi-speed EU, and not all members will all of the three reports on EU reform 5 voted by the participate in the same steps of integration," said European Parliament on the 22 nd February. One of Angela Merkel after the informal EU-Summit at these introduced by the Committee on Constitution- Valetta/Malta, 3 February 2017 – “ it was the first al Affairs, chaired by Mercedes Bresso and Elmar time that Merkel clearly claimed this old idea as her Brok, outlines the problem: “The European Union own.” 1 It amounts to a U-turn in Merkel’s EU-inte- and its Member States are facing unprecedented gration strategy; until now, she has, in fact, pinned challenges, such as the refugee crisis, the foreign all her hopes on advancing towards tighter and policy challenges in the immediate neighbourhood tougher integration with all the – 27! – Member and the fight against terrorism, as well as globalisa- States of the Union. She is not the only one to tion, climate change, demographic developments, switch from a one-fits-all approach to differentiat- unemployment, the causes and consequences of the ed integration: François Hollande agreed as much financial and debt crisis, the lack of competitiveness on the idea 2 at the same time as the Italian govern- and the social consequences in several Member ment, and the three Benelux-countries went as far States, and the need to reinforce the EU internal as to publish an official statement on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • U.E.F. NEWSLETTER No. 23
    U.E.F. NEWSLETTER N° 23 - May 2005 U.E.F. NEWSLETTER 1. FOREWORD BY MERCEDES BRESSO, No. 23 - May 2005 UEF PRESIDENT Europe is facing new and fundamental INDEX: choices: the ratification of the European Constitution has revamped a row of questions 1. FOREWORD by Mercedes BRESSO, and doubts to be confronted such as: President of UEF Which kind of Europe do we want? What are 2. FUTURE ACTIVITIES: the values and perspectives of the new • Seminar in Sofia about enlargement Europe? Do we need more market • UEF enlarged Bureau meeting (including deregulation or more social cohesion? Are the Presidents, Secretary-Generals and we ready for a single European political Treasurers of UEF constituent orgs) economy? Can Europe sustain further • Seminar in Bad Marienberg about the enlargement? European Constitution The debate over ratification in France is 3. PAST ACTIVITIES: important for all of us because for the first • Open door day in the European time European citizens face themselves and Institutions in Brussels they divide over Europe’s future on topical political issues, such as political economy, • Events and actions organised by UEF civil liberties and foreign policy. France for the OUI • Seminar in Bardoneccia about Debate over Europe now reverberates the enlargement and the Constitution fear of social dumping expressed by the left • UEF Federal Committee meeting and wing supporters of the NO, or on the other extraordinary European Congress hand of the political spectrum the nationalistic instinct of the right wing that 4. NEWS FROM UEF SECRETARIAT does not want Turkey in Europe. 5. NEWS FROM UEF MEMBER Those who support the ratification hold ORGANISATIONS better arguments: the Constitution is a • Council of Members of NOMES/NEBS framework for regulation and not a call for a (UEF Switzerland) liberalistic “free for all” market.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening of Economic Competition and Regulatory Improvement for Competitiveness in Mexico
    Strengthening of Economic Competition and Regulatory Improvement for Competitiveness in Mexico Case Study on Piemonte, Italy1 Successful Practices and Policies to Promote Regulatory Reform and Entrepreneurship 1. This case study was prepared for the OECD by Mario Calderini, President of Finpiemonte. 1 1. BROAD DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 1.1 GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE ECONOMY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES Piemonte is one of the 20 Regions of Italy; located in the North West part of the country, close to the French and Swiss border, it has an area of 25,399 km2 and a population of about 4.4 million people. Its capital, Torino, is at the centre of the regional economic activities and has been affected by important economic and industrial processes since the 19th century. In particular, the most renowned Italian automobile company, FIAT, set its headquarters and started its rapid growth in Torino in 1899; although the FIAT Group is now a diversified multinational company, it still has its headquarters in Torino. More specifically, after the Second World War, FIAT ascent lead the development of the national car industry and its presence led to the establishment of a Fordist productive paradigm that deeply influenced the regional economy and society. This paradigm was based on the existence of a few vertically integrated big plants (just to quote some of them: FIAT Lingotto and Mirafiori) characterized by industrial mass production processes, metal- mechanic technology, and the formation of a huge localized supply system, called “indotto”, made of thousands of small and medium enterprises providing components and services to the big companies.
    [Show full text]
  • When National Or Local? the Dual Climate of Opinion in the Italian Regional Elections
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 2, No. 2, 2010, 55-74 When National or Local? The Dual Climate of Opinion in the Italian Regional Elections Marinella Belluati University of Turin Abstract: Local elections in Italy have, for some time, been closely analysed because their importance in the electoral cycle has been heightened by voting-system changes that have increased the significance of sub-national levels of government. The regional elections of 2010, here examined in terms of the way they were covered in Italian national daily newspapers were, however, subject to media discussion that was dominated entirely by national issues, which obscured local issues and parties, and relegated to the background what was really at stake in these contests. The aim of this article is to verify empirically the existence in Italy of a state of permanent campaigning supported by news coverage which tends mainly to concern itself with the affairs, public and private, of Silvio Berlusconi and his governing majority. However, local politics have continued, in a less obvious but significant way, to structure the climate of opinion. Keywords: local election, climate of opinion, media coverage, local dimension For almost twenty years in Italy the traditional political parties have been undergoing a profound crisis caused by internal structural changes but also by changes in the relationship between politics and society. Against this background local politics have often furnished evidence of a growing political and social significance (Bauman, 2003) and shown an autonomous potential to determine which issues and actors dominate the political agenda. In 1995, a reform of the electoral law for regional elections 1 initiated a gradual process of transfer of competences and functions from the central state to sub-national levels (De Luca, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Comune Candelo Conferenza
    European Conference, Part III: October 25, 2008 “Cultural Heritage in Europe; a chance for the dialogue”Candelo - Polyvalent Hall – Inner City 10.00 Registration of Participants 10:15 Opening of the Conference European Commission Working Session 5: European Active Citizenship and the “Europe for Citizens” Programme TOWN TWINNING - GEMELLAGGIO Moderator: Giovanni Chilà – Candelo Municipality Vice-Mayor – Responsible of Urban Sector Town Twinning event On. Gianluca Susta - European Parliament Europe for Citizens Programme - Misure On. Gilberto Pichetto - Senator On. Roberto Simonetti – Italian Parliament 1.2 – Thematic Networking of Twinned representative (?) and Province of Biella adviser Towns Louis Caulfuty, Municipality of La Roche sur Foron Maria Isabel Martinez Parrilla – Employment and “ E.C.H.O.” Development Agent for the Comarca Campo de “European Cultural Heritage is ON ” Belchite CONFERENCE Jarosław Nowak , City Councillor and director of the Job Center - Municipality of Starachowice 11:30 OFFICIAL SIGNATURE OF TOWN TWINNING 23 - 24 - 25 October 2008 OATH Polyvalent Hall – Inner City Interventions by: Gabriella Bigatti – Administrator of the Italian Agency eConsulenza and President of Italian Association of European Projects Planners Info: “AProCom”: presentation of the European Secretary of the Municipality of Candelo (Biella): Programme “Europe for Citizens” Tel: +39 015 2534118 Fax: +39 015 2534112 Gregorio Jalle Rupérez - Mayor of Almonacid de la Email [email protected] Cuba Municipality (ES)
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fitness of Italian Regions
    ISSN: 2036-5438 The European fitness of Italian Regions by Paolo Bilancia, Francesco Palermo, Ornella Porchia Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 2, issue 2, 2010 E- 1 Abstract What impact did Europeanization have on the governmental capacity of Italian regions? Are the regions successful in addressing the challenges and the opportunities of European integration? Is the participation in the EU a driving factor for decentralization in Italy? The paper, which reproduces a study commissioned by the Bertelsmann Foundation and the Compagnia di San Paolo, provides some answers to these questions. It is argued that the "European fitness" of Italian regions is highly asymmetric and so is their responsiveness to the challenges of multilevel governance. Moreover, while Italian regions have overall benefitted from the opportunities of European integration, there is still much to do in terms of institutional capacity, especially due to the overly complex system of intergovernmental relations. Key-words: Italy, Regionalism, European Union, Intergovernmental Relations, Decentralization, Europeanization E- 123 1. Background of the national debate on territorial politics and recent changes The territorial design provided by the Italian Constitution is marked by a high degree of decentralization and is best described as “polycentric” rather than as a proper federal system. Italy was the first country to experiment with devolutionary asymmetry. After World War II, the establishment of a strong subnational level of government was inevitable in at least five territories: Trentino-Alto Adige (Trentino-South Tyrol), Valle d’Aosta (Aosta Valley), Friuli-Venezia Giulia (three relatively small alpine regioni (regions) with a relatively substantial population of ethnic minorities), Sicilia (Sicily) and Sardegna (Sardinia).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Cooperation
    .19 # 1 MARCH 2019 Enhancing ‘Enhanced Cooperation’: constraints and opportuni- ties of an inflexible flexibility clause Carsten Gerards and Wolfgang Wessels between 1999 and 2010 but repeated instances of differenti- Executive Summary ated institution-building outside the Treaties (e.g. Fiscal Com- pact) since the financial and sovereign debt crisis, the de facto > In the framework of Enhanced Cooperation in the impact of this promise must be called into question. Moreover, EU less than a handful of policy projects have been the implementation of Permanent Structured Cooperation realised so far. (PESCO) in defence projects in 2017 – an additional, single-topic > Procedural and substantive bottlenecks in the rel- Treaty framework allowing for subgroup integration – has re- evant Treaty provisions streamline the frame- cently overshadowed debates on differentiated integration in the EU. work’s application towards special legislative pro- cedure in the area of Justice and Home Affairs. Against this backdrop, this policy brief evaluates the EnC by, > The framework can substantially be improved by: first, providing a brief introduction to the subject before pre- senting three core insights from the analysis of the legal provi- > changing the incentive structure that Enhanced Co- sions governing EnC since the Lisbon Treaty, particularly focus- operation is embedded in; sing on the role of the European Parliament. Subsequently, > reducing the complexity in the realm of ‘subgroup three lessons regarding the cases of EnC ‘realised’ so far will be integration’ in the EU (especially by integrating outlined. Finally, these insights will be condensed in three pol- PESCO into the Enhanced Cooperation frame- icy recommendations with the aim to facilitate and improve the work); future use of EnC in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Press Release
    35th EU-Switzerland Inter-parliamentary Meeting Strasbourg, 23 and 24 November 2016 JOINT PRESS RELEASE by the Chairpersons of the Delegations: Thomas Aeschi (National Council, Switzerland) and Jørn Dohrmann (European Parliament) The delegations responsible for EU-Switzerland relations from the Swiss Federal Assembly and the European Parliament met in Strasbourg on 23 and 24 November. Talks at the 35th inter-parliamentary annual meeting focused on the institutional framework for EU-Switzer- land relations, the free movement of persons, migration (Schengen/Dublin) and cross-border cooperation for combating terrorism. Delegations further exchanged views about the benefits of free trade agreements. Under the co-chairmanship of National Council member Thomas Aeschi (SVP/ZG) and MEP Jørn Dohrmann (ECR, Denmark), the members of the two delegations discussed the state of bilateral relations and of the ongoing talks concerning institutional issues in connection with the bilateral agreements with Mr Claude Maerten, Head of the Western Europe Division of the European External Action Service, and Ambassador Urs Bucher, Head of the Swiss Mission to the EU in Brussels. The chairs of the two delegations, National Council member Thomas Aeschi and MEP Jørn Dohrmann, agreed that the bilateral path remains the best instrument for maintaining well-functioning relations between Switzer- land and the EU, traditionally based on close partnership. It was in this context that the ongoing deliberations regarding implementation of the mass immigration initiative were addressed. A further topic of discussion during the inter-parliamentary meeting was the high number of irregular entries into the Schengen area. Representatives from both delegations spoke in favour of better enforcing Schengen’s external border control with the aim of increasing security within the Schengen area so as to be able to continue to safeguard the freedom of movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 32Nd National Congress of the Italian Sports Medicine Federation 1923–2009 – 80 Years of History
    32nd National Congress of the Italian Sports Medicine Federation 1923–2009 – 80 years of history Programme The Medical Specialist in the Future of Sports Medicine Turin, 19–22 February 2009 Lingotto Conference Centre Requested: The High Patronage of the President of the Italian Republic and the patronage of: Presidency of the Council of Ministers Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Policy Ministry of Youth Ministry of Education, Universities and Research Italian National Olympic Committee Fédération Internationale de Médecine du Sport European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations National Federation for the Orders of Doctors and Dentists Regional Administration of Piemonte Province of Turin Municipality of Turin University of Turin 1 32nd National Congress of the Italian Sports Medicine Federation 1923–2009 – 80 years of history Programme The Medical Specialist in the Future of Sports Medicine Turin, 19–22 February 2009 Lingotto Conference Centre President of the Congress Maurizio Casasco Honorary Presidents Giorgio Santilli Carlo Gabriele Gribaudo Honour Committee Giovanni Petrucci Rocco Crimi President of CONI State Secretary, Prime Minister's Office, responsible for Sport Raffaele Pagnozzi General Secretary of CONI Ferruccio Fazio State Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Health and Walter R. Frontera Social Policy, responsible for Health President of FIMS Mercedes Bresso Fabio Pigozzi President of the Regional Administration of General Secretary of FIMS Piemonte Norbert Bachl Antonio Saitta President of EFSMA President of the Province
    [Show full text]