DOCSLIB.ORG

EP Elections 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EP Elections 2014 EP Elections 2014 Results by country Please find below a compilation of all results per country, list of winners, as well as charts with national parties' representation in the EP political groups. The figures of parties' results and the names of elected candidates are final, however subject to change depending on development of internal procedures in the parties. EU Elections 2014 - 1 - EP Overview (02/06/2014) EU Elections 2014 - 2 - List of countries: Austria Italy Belgium Latvia Bulgaria Lithuania Croatia Luxembourg Cyprus Malta Czech Republic Netherlands Denmark Poland Estonia Portugal Finland Romania France Slovakia Germany Slovenia Greece Spain Hungary Sweden Ireland United Kingdom EU Elections 2014 - 3 - Austria Final Total Winning candidates: Party Current +/- Results Members People's Party (ÖVP) 27% 5 6 -1 Candidate Party Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) 24% 5 5 0 1. Othmar Karas* ÖVP Hans-Peter Martin's List (MARTIN) - 0 3 -3 2. Elisabeth Köstinger* ÖVP Freedom Party (FPÖ) 21% 4 2 +2 3. Paul Rübig* ÖVP 4. Claudia Schmidt ÖVP The Greens (GRÜNE) 14% 3 2 +1 5. Heinz Kurt Becker* ÖVP Alliance for the Future of Austria (BZÖ) - 0 1 -1 6. Eugen Freund SPÖ New Austria (NEOS) 8% 1 0 +1 7. Evelyn Regner* SPÖ 8. Jörg Leichtfried* SPÖ 9. Karin Ingeborg Kadenbach* SPÖ 10. Joseph Weidenholzer* SPÖ 11. Harald Vilimsky FPÖ 12. Franz Obermayr* FPÖ 13. Georg Mayer FPÖ 14. Barara Kappel FPÖ 15. Ulrike Lunacek* GRÜNE 16. Michel Reimon GRÜNE 17. Monika Vana GRÜNE 18. Angelika Mlinar NEOS *current MEP, re-elected EU Elections 2014 - 4 - Belgium Winning candidates: Final Total Party (Dutch college) results Members Current +/- Candidate Party Christian Democratic & Flemish (CD&V) 19.96% 2 3 -1 Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (open VLD) 20.40% 3 3 0 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Open VLD 2. Marianne Thyssen* CD&V Flemish Interest (VB) 6.76% 1 2 -1 3. Johan Van Overtveldt N-VA Socialist Party Different (sp.a) 13.18% 1 2 -1 4. Louis Michel* MR New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 26.67% 4 1 +3 5. Kathleen Van Brempt* SP.A Green! (GROEN!) 10.62% 1 1 0 6. Ivo Belet* CD&V List Dedecker (LDD) - 0 1 -1 7. Mark Demesmaeker* N-VA 8. Bart Staes* Groen Final Total 9. Marie Arena PS Party (French college) results Members Current +/- 10. Frédérique Ries* MR Socialist Party (PS) 29.38% 3 3 0 11. Helga Stevens N-VA Reformist Movement (MR) 27.1% 3 2 +1 12. Gerolf Annemans Vlaams Belang 13. Karel de Gucht / Philippe de Backer* Open VLD Ecolo 11.69% 1 2 -1 14. Annemie Neyts* Open VLD Humanist Democratic Centre (CDH) 11.36% 1 1 0 15. Louis Ide N-VA 16. Claude Rolin CDH 17. Marc Tarabella* PS 18. Gérard Deprez MR 19. Hugues Bayet PS 20. Philippe Lamberts* Ecolo 21. Pascal Arimont CSP EU Elections 2014 - 5 - Bulgaria Winning candidates: Party Final Total Current +/- results Members Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB) 30.40% 6 5 +1 1. Angel Chavdarov Dzhambazki (BBT) 2. Andrey Andreev Kovachev*(GERB) Coalition for Bulgaria (KB) 18.94% 4 3 +1 3. Vladimir Andreev Urutchev* (GERB) Movement for Rights and Freedoms (DPS) 17.26% 4 3 +1 4. Georgi Georgiev Pirinski (KB) Coalition of United Democrats (KOD) 0 2 -2 5. Eva Konstantinova Paunova (GERB) Reformist Bloc (RB) 6.4 5% 1 2 -1 6. Emil Yordanov Radev (GERB) National Front for the Salvation of Bulgaria (NFSB) 0 1 -1 7. Iliyana Malinova Iotova* (KB) National Democratic Party (NDP) 0 1 -1 8. Ilhan Ahmet Kyuchyuk (DPS) Bulgaria Without Censorship (BBT) 10.66 % 2 0 +2 9. Iskra Dimitrova Mihaylova-Koparova (DPS) 10. Mariya Ivanova Gabriel* (GERB) Alternative for Bulgarian Renaissance (ABV) 0 1 -1 11. Momchil Stefanov Nekov (KB) 12. Nedzhmi Niyazi Ali (DPS) 13. Nikolay Tihomirov Barekov (BBT) 14. Svetoslav Hristov Malinov* (RB) 15. Sergey Dmitrievich Stanishev (KB) 16. Tomislav Peykov Donchev (GERB) 17. Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova* (DPS) EU Elections 2014 - 6 - Croatia Party Final Total Winning candidates: results Members Current +/- Croatian Democratic Union et. al (HDZ)* 41.4% 6 6 0 Candidate (Party) Kukuriku coalition (inc. SDP)* 29.9% 4 5 -1 1. Ruža Tomašić* (HSP-AS) Labour (HL) 0 1 -1 2. Andrej Plenković* (HDZ) Croatian Sustainable Development (ORaH) 9.4% 1 0 +1 3. Marijana Petir (HSS) Centre Partnership (HSLS, NF et. al) 0.0% 0 0 0 4. Dubravka Šuica* (HDZ) 5. Ivana Maletić* (HDZ) Alliance for Croatia (HSSSB, HSP, HRAST et al.) 0 0 0 6. Davor Ivo Stier* (HDZ) 7. Tonino Picula* (SDP) 8. Biljana Borzan* (SDP) 9. Jozo Radoš (HNS) 10. Ivan Jakovčić (IDS) 11. Damir Škrlec (ORaH) EU Elections 2014 - 7 - Cyprus Final Total Party Current +/- Winning candidates: Results Members Democratic Rally/European Party (DISY/EVROKO)* 37,78% 2 2 0 Candidate Party Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL) 26,78% 2 2 0 1. Eleni Theocharous* DISI Democratic Party (DIKO) 10,86% 1 1 0 2. Christos Stilianides DISI Movement for Social Democracy / Ecological and 3. Takis Chatzigeorgiou* AKEL 7,69% 1 1 0 Environmental Movement (EDEK/KOP)* 4. Neoklis Silikiotis AKEL 5. Kostas Mavridis DIKO 6. Dimitris Papadakis EDEK EU Elections 2014 - 8 - Czech Republic Winning candidates: Party Final Total Result Members Current +/- Candidate (Party): Civic Democratic Party (ODS) 7.7% 2 9 -7 Social Democratic Party (ČSSD) 14.2% 4 7 -3 1. Pavel Svoboda (KDU–ČSL) Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM) 11.0% 3 4 -1 2. Michaela Šojdrová (KDU–ČSL) 3. Tomáš Zdechovský (KDU–ČSL) Christian and Democratic Union – People's Party (KDU–ČSL) 10.0% 3 2 +1 4. Luděk Niedermayer (TOP 09) Action of Dissatisfied Citizens (ANO 2011) 16.1% 4 0 +4 5. Jiří Pospíšil (TOP 09) Tradition Responsibility Prosperity (TOP 09) 15.9% 4 0 +4 6. Stanislav Polčák (TOP 09) Free Citizens Party (SSO) 5.2% 1 0 +1 7. Jaromír Štětina (TOP 09) 8. Jan Keller (ČSSD) 9. Olga Sehnalová* (ČSSD) 10. Pavel Poc* (ČSSD) 11. Poche Miroslav (ČSSD) 12. Jan Zahradil* (ODS) 13. Evžen Tošenovský* (ODS) 14. Kateřina Konečná (KSČM) 15. Jiří Maštálka* (KSČM) 16. Ransdorf Miloslav* (KSČM) 17. Pavel Telička (ANO 2011) 18. Petr Ježek (ANO 2011) 19. Dita Charanzová (ANO 2011) 20. Martina Dlabajová (ANO 2011) 21. Petr Mach (Svobodní) EU Elections 2014 - 9 - Denmark Final Total Winning candidates: Party results Members Current +/- Alliance V + KF 25.9% 3 Candidate Party Liberal Party (V) 16.7% 2 3 -1 1. Ulla Tørnæs V Conservative People's Party (C/KF) 9.2% 1 1 0 2. Jens Rohde V Alliance SD + RV + SF 36.5% 5 3. Bendt Bendtsen* C/KF 4. Jeppe Kofod A/SD Social Democrats (A/SD) 19.1% 3 5 -2 5. Christel Schaldemose* A/SD Social Liberal Party (B/RV) 6.5% 1 0 +1 6. Ole Christensen* A/SD Socialist People's Party (F/SF) 10.9% 1 1 0 7. Morten Helveg Petersen B/RV People's Party (O/DF) 26.6% 4 1 +3 8. Margrete Auken* F/SF People's Movement against the EU (N) 8.1% 1 1 0 9. Morten Messerschmidt* O/DF Independents 0% 0 1 -1 10. Anders Vistisen O/DF 11. Rikke Karlsson O/DF 12. Jørn Dohrmann O/DF 13. Rina Ronja Kari* N EU Elections 2014 - 10 - Estonia Total Winning candidates: Party Final Current +/- results Members Centre Party (KESK) 22.3% 1 0 +1 Candidate Party Independent (Indrek Tarand) 13.2% 1 1 0 1. Andrus Ansip ER Reform Party (ER) 24.3% 2 1 +1 2. Kaja Kallas ER Pro Patria and Res Publica Union (IRL) 13.9% 1 1 0 3. Yana Toom KESK Social Democratic Party (SDE) 13.6% 1 1 0 4. Tunne-Väldo Kelam* IRL 5. Marju Lauristin SDE Independents (former ER/KESK) 0.0% 0 2 -2 6. Indrek Tarand* Independent EU Elections 2014 - 11 - Finland Final Total 2009-14 +/- Winning candidates: Party Results Members National Coalition Party (KOK) 22,6% 3 3 0 Candidate Party Centre Party (KESK) 19,7% 3 3 0 1. Alexander Stubb KOK Social Democratic Party (SDP) 12,3% 2 2 0 2. Olli Rehn KESK Green League (VIHR) 9,3% 1 2 -1 3. Jussi Halla-aho PS True Finns (PS) 12,9% 2 1 +1 4. Liisa Jaakonsaari * SDP Swedish People's Party (SFP/RKP) 6,7% 1 1 0 5. Sirpa Pietikäinen * KOK Christian Democrats (KD) 5,2% 0 1 -1 6. Paavo Väyrynen KESK Left Alliance (V) 9,3% 1 0 +1 7. Heidi Hautala VIHR 8. Merja Kyllönen V 9. Henna Virkkunen KOK 10. Nils Torvalds * RKP 11. Anneli Jäätteenmäki * KESK 12. Sampo Terho * PS 13. Miapetra Kumpula-Natri SDP EU Elections 2014 - 12 - France Total Party Final results Members Current +/- Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) 20.7% 20 24 -4 Socialist Party (PS) 13.9% 13 13 0 Europe Ecology – The Greens (EELV) 8.8% 6 16 -10 Democratic Movement (MD) / Union of 9.7% 7 12 -5 Democrats and Independents (UDI) Left Front (FG) 6.2% 4 5 -1 National Front (FN) 26.0% 24 3 +21 Movement for France (MPF) 0 1 -1 Winning candidates: East : Florian Philippot (FN), Sophie Montel (FN), Jean-François Jalkh (FN), Dominique Bilde (FN), Nadine Morano (UMP), Arnaud Danjean (UMP)*, Anne Sander (UMP), Edouard Martin (PS), Nathalie Griesbeck (MD/MDI)* Centre : Bernard Monot (FN), Philippe Loiseau (FN), Brice Hortefeux (UMP)*, Angélique Delahaye (UMP), Jean-Paul Denanot (PS), South West : Louis Aliot (FN), Joelle Melin (FN), Edouard Ferrand(FN), Michèle Alliot-Marie (UMP) Franck Proust (UMP)*, Virginie Rozière (PS), Eric Andrieu (PS)*, José Bové (Europe Ecology -The Greens)*, Robert Rochefort (MD/UDI)*, Jean-Luc Melenchon (Left Front)* South East : Jean-Marie Le Pen (FN)*, Marie-Christine Arnautu (FN), Bruno Gollnisch (FN)*, Mireille D'ornano (FN), Dominique Martin(FN), Renaud Muselier (UMP), Françoise Grossetête (UMP*), Michel Dantin (UMP)*, Vincent Peillon (PS), Sylvie Guillaume (PS)*, Michèle Rivasi (Europe Ecology, Greens)*, Marie-Christine Vergiat (Left Front)*, Sylvie Goulart (MD/MDI)* North West : Marine Le Pen (FN)*, Steeve Briois (FN), Mylène Troszczynski (FN), Nicolas Bay(FN), Sylvie Goddyn (FN), Jérôme Lavrilleux (UMP), Tokia Saïfi (UMP)*, Gilles Pargneaux (PS)*,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
    Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
    [Show full text]
  • Bears and Traditional Medicine World Animal Protection Email: [email protected]
    Correspondent: Mr Gilbert M. Sape Global Head of Campaign - Bears and Traditional Medicine World Animal Protection Email: [email protected] Joint open letter to: Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Dr Zhang Qi Director General Co-ordinator of Traditional and Complementary World Health Organisation Medicine Unit (TCM) Avenue Appia 20 Department of Service Delivery and Safety 1211 Geneva World Health Organisation Switzerland Avenue Appia 20 1211 Geneva Switzerland 6th April 2020 Dear Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Dr Zhang Qi, COVID-19: Health risks and wildlife1 markets – the need for a permanent global ban on wildlife markets and a highly precautionary approach to wildlife trade. The undersigned organisations acknowledge and commend the World Health Organisation’s current efforts to contain the pandemic spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). On the occasion of World Health Day, in the midst of a global pandemic believed to have originated in a live wildlife market, we call upon the WHO to publicly and unequivocally state the proven link between these markets and serious threats to human health. In line with its stated mission to serve public health at all times, we urge the WHO to recommend that governments worldwide permanently ban live wildlife markets and the use of wildlife in traditional medicine. This decisive action, well within the WHO’s mandate, would be an impactful first step in adopting a highly precautionary approach to wildlife trade that poses a risk to human health. While a robust global response is critical in detecting, treating and reducing transmission, it is equally necessary to take vital measures to prevent similar emerging infectious diseases developing into pandemics with the associated threats to human life, and social and economic well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 7
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2020/2098(REG) 24.9.2020 AMENDMENTS 7 - 43 Draft report Gabriele Bischoff (PE654.009v01-00) Amendments to the Rules of Procedure in order to ensure the functioning of Parliament in extraordinary circumstances (2020/2098(REG)) AM\1214113EN.docx PE657.438v02-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_RulesReport PE657.438v02-00 2/64 AM\1214113EN.docx EN Amendment 7 László Trócsányi, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa Proposal for a decision Citation -1 (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1 having regard to Parliament's roles, functions and competences laid down in the Treaties, Or. en Amendment 8 László Trócsányi, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch Proposal for a decision Citation -1 a (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1a having regard to the primary obligation of the institutions of the European Union to safeguard the rule of law also in their own functioning, Or. en Amendment 9 László Trócsányi, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa Proposal for a decision Citation -1 b (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1b having regard to the rights of persons with disabilities and to the AM\1214113EN.docx 3/64 PE657.438v02-00 EN European Parliament resolution of 7 July 2016 on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, with special regard to the Concluding Observations of the UN CRPD Committee1a ; _________________ 1a OJ C 101, 16.3.2018, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Élections Européennes Pourquoi Voter ? Français
    Élection2s eu0rop1éen9nes LE PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN LES ÉLECTIONS EUROPÉENNES POURQUOI VOTER ? FRANÇAIS Pays-Bas Résultat des élections du 26 mai 2019 Afficher 10 éléments Rechercher: Affiliation Tendance Nombre Pourcentage de Nombre Partis politiques politique par rapport à de voix voix de sièges européenne 2014 Parti travailliste (PvdA) S&D 19,01% 6 ↑ Parti populaire pour la Renew Europe 14,64% 4 ↓ liberté et la démocratie (VVD) Appel chrétien-démocrate PPE 12,18% 4 ↓ (CDA) Forum démocratie (FvD) CRE 10,96% 3 Parti vert (GL) Verts/ALE 10,90% 3 ↑ Démocrates 66 Renew Europe 7,09% 2 ↑ Union chrétienne (CU- CRE 6,83% 2 SGP) Parti pour les animaux GUE/NGL 4,02% 1 ↑ (PvdD) 50PLUS 3,91% 1 Parti de la liberté (PVV) 3,53% 0 ↓ Affichage des éléments 1 à 10 sur 11 éléments Précédent Suivant Les députés élus Esther de Lange Appel Démocrate Chrétien PPE Jeroen Lenaers Appel Démocrate Chrétien PPE Tom Berendsen Appel Démocrate Chrétien PPE Annie Schreijer-Pierik Appel Démocrate Chrétien PPE Peter van Dalen Union chrétienne (CU-SGP) PPE Antonius Manders 50PLUS PPE Lara Wolters Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Agnes Jongerius Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Paul Tang Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Kati Piri Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Vera Tax Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Mohammed Chahim Parti travailliste (PVDA) S&D Malik Azmani Le Parti du Peuple pour la Liberté et la Démocratie Renew Europe Jan Huitema Le Parti du Peuple pour la Liberté et la Démocratie Renew Europe Caroline Nagtegaal-Van Doorn Le Parti du Peuple pour la Liberté et la Démocratie
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Transport and Tourism TRAN_PV(2018)0524_1 MINUTES Meeting of 24 May 2018, 09.00-12.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 09.05 on Thursday, 24 May 2018, with Karima Delli (Chair) presiding. 24 May 2018, 9.00 – 12.30 1. Adoption of agenda Decision: The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements *** Electronic vote *** 3. Common rules for the operation of air services in the Community TRAN/8/08880 ***I 2016/0411(COD) COM(2016)0818 – C8-0531/2016 Rapporteur: Claudia Țapardel (S&D) Responsible: TRAN Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Decision: Adopted.: 35 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions Mobility package vote: 4. Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures TRAN/8/10069 ***I 2017/0114(COD) COM(2017)0275 – C8-0171/2017 Rapporteur: Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy (S&D) PR – PE615.363v03-00 Responsible: TRAN* Opinions: ECON – Decision: no opinion PV\1154028EN.docx PE622.227v01-00 EN United in diversity EN ENVI* – Seb Dance (S&D) AD – PE613.289v03-00 AM – PE618.020v01-00 AM – PE618.021v01-00 Adoption of draft report Amendments Comp 1, Comp 2, AM 26, Envi AM 27, AM 227, AM 262, AM 28, adopted: Comp 3,Comp 4, Comp 4A, Comp 5A, Comp 6, Comp 7, Comp 7A, AM 39, Comp 8, AM342, AM 152, Comp 9, Comp 10, AM 407, AM 413, AM 53, AM 414, Comp 11, AM 57, Comp 12, AM 58, Envi AM 52, Comp 14, AM 470,AM 480, AM 63, AM 77, AM 81, Envi AM 1, Envi AM 2, Envi AM 4, Envi AM 5, Comp 15, AM 2, AM 3, Envi AM 10, Comp 16, AM 103, AM 107, AM 104, AM 4, Envi AM 8, AM 5, Comp 17, AM 112, AM 7, AM 8, Comp 18, Comp 19, AM 10, Envi AM 16, Comp 20, Comp 21, AM 148, AM 12, AM 13, AM 171, AM 174,Comp 22, AM 180, Comp 23,AM 195, AM 196 Decision: Adopted.: 35 votes to 2, with 3 abstentions Correction of MEP Schmidt meant to vote against in the final vote vote: Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Decision: Adopted.: 38 votes to 1, with 1 abstentions 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Assistance Package to Tackle the Global Coronavirus Pandemic 7
    A global assistance package to tackle the global coronavirus pandemic 7 April 2020 The coronavirus is a global challenge, and a global response is therefore the only option. No country can cope with the coronavirus crisis and its already devastating consequences alone. If we work against each other, we will all lose in the end. We can and will only overcome this crisis through cooperation and dialogue. In many countries, including in Germany, public, economic and cultural life has been at a standstill for weeks. Drastic steps have been taken to keep health systems from collapsing. And nonetheless, we are anxiously looking at the infection graphs and worrying about our family members and friends. Like many other countries, Germany has put together an unprecedented rescue package for businesses and workers to contain the economic and social consequences. Unfortunately, not all countries are in a position to do so. The coronavirus is impacting everyone, irrespective of their origins, gender or skin colour. Yet, already vulnerable populations are most affected. This applies, in particular, to people who live in countries with weakened public institutions and health systems, where social safety nets are inadequate or non-existent, and where there is a lack of access to clean water and sanitation facilities. In addition, the economic consequences and responses are distributed unevenly: while many European countries, the United States and China can afford to put together gigantic assistance packages at short notice, many developing countries are much more likely to plunge into devastating economic and currency crises. We therefore need a global response to the coronavirus crisis which is based on solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative
    Assembly and Executive Review Committee Review of the Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly and on the Reduction in the Number of Northern Ireland Departments Part 1 - Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly Together with the Minutes of Proceedings of the Committee relating to the Report, the Minutes of Evidence, Written Submissions, Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Papers and Other Papers Ordered by the Assembly and Executive Review Committee to be printed on 12 June 2012 Report: NIA 52/11-15 (Assembly and Executive Review Committee) REPORT EMBARGOED UNTIL COMMENCEMENT OF THE DEBATE IN PLENARY Mandate 2011/15 Second Report Committee Powers and Membership Committee Powers and Membership Powers The Assembly and Executive Review Committee is a Standing Committee established in accordance with Section 29A and 29B of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and Standing Order 59 which provide for the Committee to: ■ consider the operation of Sections 16A to 16C of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and, in particular, whether to recommend that the Secretary of State should make an order amending that Act and any other enactment so far as may be necessary to secure that they have effect, as from the date of the election of the 2011 Assembly, as if the executive selection amendments had not been made; ■ make a report to the Secretary of State, the Assembly and the Executive Committee, by no later than 1 May 2015, on the operation of Parts III and IV of the Northern Ireland Act 1998; and ■ consider such other matters relating to the functioning of the Assembly or the Executive as may be referred to it by the Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]