Dear Friends! VIII International Maritime Defence Show Will Be Held in St. Petersburg from June 28 to July 2, 2017! This Represe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dear Friends! VIII International Maritime Defence Show Will Be Held in St. Petersburg from June 28 to July 2, 2017! This Represe Dear friends! VIII International Maritime Defence Show will be held in St. Petersburg from June 28 to July 2, 2017! This representative forum has become one of the landmarks of our city – marine capital of Russia. It offers unrivalled opportunity to unveil state-of-the-art developments in naval and commercial shipbuilding, navigation. Interest in the Show is being continuously deepened along with number of participants growing. Exhibition and debate platforms of the largest marine forum are engaging for experts as well as for citizens and tourists. Shipbuilding heritage of the Emperor Peter the Great is being cherished in St. Petersburg. Shipbuilding complex of our city has always been and remains to be one of the most dynamic industries. There are major enterprises, research centers and design bureaus, institutes of higher maritime education. Today St. Petersburg shipyards are mastering leading edge products, implementing ambitious modernization projects. Powerful advanced vessels with unique specifications are developed in Russia for sea guarding and studying. At that 80 percent of which are launched in St. Petersburg. Leaders of enterprises, experts in marine business, government officials are warmly welcome to VIII International Maritime Defence Show 2017! The Show will be another step in strengthening international cooperation in marine science and technology. I wish rewarding work, new challenging ideas and reaching goals to all experts involved in marine business! St. Petersburg Governor Georgy Poltavchenko Interview with A.V. Fomin, Director of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation of Russia Brazil are major Russian partners here. Cooperation high-end and reliable weapons and military equip- Moreover, we managed drawing numerous fa- with Cuba and Peru is taking new level. ment we are striving to move beyond the bureau- vorable lessons as matters stand. Above all, I mean As before, aircraft engineering is the most-cov- cracy in this area by avoiding any risk to defence actions of Russian companies taken to implement eted with 51 % of overall volume of exported de- capacity and safety of our country. Import Substitution Program for OEM compo- fence products, the second place is taken by 19 % air For this purpose, jointly with the other federal nents, element base, raw materials and supplies defence followed by land arm technologies (16 %) executive bodies we carry out methodical work on used at development, manufacture, modernization and naval engineering (10 %). perfection of the legal base in the field of MTC. and repair of Russian weapons and military equip- In this way, today, all the organizations of the ment. Finally we succeeded in developing Russian – What Russian arms & military equipment domestic military-defence complex were provided weaponry and military equipment noninferior to exhibitions may be recommended for cur- with an opportunity, while meeting the measures on foreign counterparts and superior thereto for a rent and potential customers to learn recent protection of the information which contains the number of criteria. advances of Russian engineers and manufac- state secret, to demonstrate on the basis of decisions Also worth noting is that some countries have re- turers? made by FSMTC of Russia at the international exhi- cently become more and more preferential to Russia – Our exhibitions are integrated into interna- bitions in our country and foreign countries the up- at tendering process by considering its reputation of tional exhibition schedule, they are intensively de- to-date samples of military-purpose products which reliable partner in MTC domain. These days many veloping with their image and audience. Each of was not included in the list of the military-purpose people have understood that in critical situation our these exhibitions may be recommended for foreign products allowed to be transmitted to foreign cus- country will not disclaim assumed international ob- partners to have a look at arms and military equip- tomers. Formerly, it was necessary to have the spe- ligations even being pressed. ment of interest for the state military forces. cial decision of the President of the Russian Federa- The success of Russian aerospace forces in Syria Naval engineering and weaponry are traditional- tion. The decision-making procedure regarding the drove up demand for Russian weaponry among for- – What is your estimate of trends in Rus- ly exhibited at International Maritime Defence Show expansion of such products at the exhibitions was eign partners, as well. In Syria the entire world wit- sian military product export in the years to in St. Petersburg. Aviation, space technologies and air simplified. nessed Russian smart and highly efficient weaponry come? What are the countries to be the most defence assets are unveiled at the International Avia- Thus, we strive to make all of the held exposi- employed at long distances. active in military & technical cooperation? tion and Space Salon MAKS in Zhukovsky, Moscow tions interesting for our foreign partners and aimed What defense products are most popular with oblast. There are exhibitions aimed at promotion at strengthening and development of the military- – FSMTC of Russia has always been involved foreign customers? of specific products highly sought both in military technical cooperation of the Russian Federation in IMDS since the very first show. Are there – Notwithstanding complicated international and commercial domains. I mean International with foreign countries. any plans to take part in IMDS-2017? situation Russia remains to be one of the major sup- Helicopter Industry Exhibition HeliRussia held in – FSMTC of Russia has been actively participating pliers in global market of armament and military Krasnogorsk, Moscow oblast, and International ex- – What is the effect of international climate in the International Maritime Defence Show since equipment. We are quite successful in deepening hibition and scientific conference on hydroaviation on military & technical cooperation? Has the 2003. Our representatives are traditionally the mem- military & technical cooperation with foreign part- Gidroaviasalon in Gelendzhik, Krasnodar region. RF membership of partner countries changed? bers of organization committee, as well as working ners. Russian defence products have been consis- Ministry of Defense holds International military- What about the range and scope of defence groups involved in show arrangement and holding. tently exported for the recent years and we do hope technical forum Army to exhibit the key trends in products delivered to foreign partners? And, of course, FSMTS of Russia ensures control to hold the bar high in the future. development of advanced and leading-edge weap- – Certainly, any variation in global political and and coordination of Russian organizations as it does We had military and technical contacts with onry. This largest in Russia forum is held in Kubinka, economic situation affects MTC process. Global crisis at all other international exhibitions of military more than one hundred countries last year, Russian Moscow region, from 2015. resulted in commodity market fluctuations involving products held in the Russian Federation according defence products were supplied to 58 countries. For obvious reasons the interest of foreign cus- military costs cutout in a number of countries. Steep to powers the Service is vested with. Asian and African regions are the leaders in defence tomers to exhibition platforms where they can learn fall in oil prices affects the potential of our partners Moreover, in order to gain the full advantage of order portfolio with the vast majority of contracts Russian developments aimed at assurance of state to buy Russian defence products. Moreover, we have this exhibition platform used for discussing MTC gained. India and China are the key Asian partners. and citizens safety is growing – these are Interna- had to refuse numerous joint projects with our ex- between Russia and foreign states the Service sends Russian military & technical cooperation (hereinaf- tional exhibition Interpolitex and Integrated Safety partners recently. Sectorial sanctions imposed by the invitations and information letters on the coming ter MTC) is intensively deepened with Vietnam and and Security Exhibition held in Moscow. United States of America and their allies culminated Show to military and political establishments of for- Indonesia. MTC is being continued with Middle East In view of increasingly competitive environment in curtailed MTC with European countries. We re- eign states being current or potential partners. countries. Our new partners comprise Botswana, in global arms market and enhanced efficiency of main open for cooperation and hope for its prompt Kenya, Cameroon and South Sudan. Persistent ef- Russian defence product exporters at international resumption, but, unfortunately, the leaders in certain We plan to carry out all of these events in prepa- forts are being applied to establish MTC with Latin exhibitions, as well as forehanded awareness of countries seem to be unprepared to pursue autono- ration for the International Maritime Defence Show America and Caribbean countries. Venezuela and foreign customers on Russian capability to develop mous foreign policy independent of the USA. IMDS-2017 as well. Министерство ООО Министерство обороны Министерство Федеральная служба Правительство АО промышленности и торговли «Морской Салон» Российской Федерации иностранных дел по военно-техническому
Recommended publications
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies
    Baltic Rim Economies Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Poland - Baltic Russia Bimonthly Review ISSUE NO. 5, 31 OCTOBER 2008 ECONOMIC REVIEWS: ESTONIA Page 1 LATVIA Page 2 LITHUANIA Page 3 POLAND Page 4 ST. PETERSBURG Page 5 LENINGRAD REGION Page 6 KALININGRAD REGION Page 7 EXPERT ARTICLES: José Manuel Durão Barroso: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Page 8 Paula Lehtomäki : Cleaner, safer and brighter future of the Baltic Sea Page 9 Jaak Aaviksoo: Events in Georgia provoke discussions on security in good, old, peaceful Europe Page 10 Siiri Oviir: Gas pipeline to the Baltic Sea – should it come in a civilized way or under the dictate of the big and the powerful? Page 12 Artis Pabriks: Baltic security reflections in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian conflict Page 13 Efthimios E. Mitropoulos: Busy Baltic to benefit from global pollution measures Page 14 Jari Luoto: EU focuses on the Baltic Sea Page 15 André Mernier: A role for the Energy Charter in a new Russia-EU Partnership Agreement Page 16 Timo Rajala: Finland is facing major energy decisions Page 18 Karlis Mikelsons: Environmentally friendly for sustainable growth Page 19 Reinier Zwitserloot: Nord Stream – making more European energy solidarity possible Page 20 Viktoras Valentukevicius: Current and future activities of Lietuvos Dujos AB Page 21 Seppo Remes: Russian gas can unite Europe – if we allow it Page 22 Aleksandra Mierzyńska and Krzysztof Parkoła: PGNiG – trying to be one step further Page 24 Tapio Reponen: Profiling as a key success factor in modern university strategies Page 25 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summary
    Contact Expert Group – Project Summary Project Title UK7 Dismantling of two Oscar 1 Class nuclear submarines General Information Start Date: 2003-11-21 End Date: 2004-12-31 Status: Completed Cost: 11 424 000 GBP Project Summary Russia constructed some 250 nuclear submarines; of which about 90 are Strategic type (Housing ballistic missiles) and the remainder were General Purpose (GP) type carrying torpedoes and/or cruise missiles. Since its signature of the START agreement, Russia has accepted an obligation to progressively reduce its submarine fleet, and this intention has been reinforced by the decline in funding for the Russian navy since Perestroika, which has both accelerated the withdrawal of submarines from active service, and inhibited work on defuelling and dismantling these submarines. The Strategic submarines issue has been the subject of a bilateral agreement with the US (under its Co- Operative Threat Reduction Programme) that agreed to fund the dismantling of about 30 such submarines. However, there has hitherto been no corresponding aid programme to fund the dismantling of GP submarines. Although of somewhat lower military significance, these are of high safety and environmental significance, since they are in many cases older than the Strategic submarines, and have in many cases deteriorated to the point where they can no longer be relied on to remain afloat. Although most of these older GP submarines have been withdrawn from service, many have not yet been defuelled, and the prospect of their sinking with their nuclear fuel still on board has been a matter of rising concern to Russia and its neighbours. The underlying objectives of this project are: - To undertake dismantling of two General Purpose nuclear submarines in NW Russia nominated by MINATOM and agreed by the UK DTI.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024
    The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Report Price: US$4,800 (Single User) 1 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Summary “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” offers the reader detailed analysis of the global submarine market over the next ten years, and provides market size forecasts. It covers the key technological and market trends in the submarine market. The demand for global submarines is anticipated to be driven by growing regional tensions, coupled with maritime conflicts. The new technological advancements in the sector will also drive demand. The market is expected to be dominated by North America, followed by Asia Pacific and Europe. In spite of the budget sequestration measures, the US still has the highest spend in the sector and is almost equal to the spending in Asia-Pacific, which is the second largest spending region. Asia Pacific is the second largest market for submarines with major spenders in the region including China, India, Australia and Japan. “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” provides detailed analysis of the current industry size and growth expectations from 2014 to 2024, including highlights of key growth stimulators. It also benchmarks the industry against key global markets and provides a detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas. Key Findings A major finding in the report entails that the sector demand will be largely driven by increase in maritime security threats and need for replacement of obsolete submarines; leading to consistent growth in the market. The demand for submarines is also anticipated to be driven by the need for the balance of power by countries with major militaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia
    GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO UPSTREAM OIL & GAS IN RUSSIA HOW SUBSIDIES INFLUENCE THE YAMAL LNG AND PRIRAZLOMNOE PROJECTS Page i Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia How Subsidies Influence the Yamal LNG and Prirazlomnoe Projects GENEVA-OSLO-MOSCOW JULY 2014 Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group PUBLISHED IN PARTNERSHIP BY: www.globalsubsidies.org GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO UPSTREAM OIL & GAS IN RUSSIA HOW SUBSIDIES INFLUENCE THE YAMAL LNG AND PRIRAZLOMNOE PROJECTS Page ii Government Support to Upstream Oil & Gas in Russia How Subsidies Influence the Yamal LNG and Prirazlomnoe Projects Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group Geneva-Oslo-Moscow, July 2014 © 2014 The International Institute for Sustainable Development/WWF Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report has been commissioned by the Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) thanks to the generous support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. The report has been prepared by Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft, Sigra Group, in coordination with Ivetta Gerasimchuk, PhD in Economics, and Lucy Kitson, IISD-GSI. WWF-Russia has provided communications and outreach support for the report. This report has been peer-reviewed by: • Mikhail Babenko, PhD in Economics, Oil & Gas Officer, WWF Global Arctic Programme • James Henderson, Senior Research Fellow, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies •
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    RCHITECTURE DURING THE EPOCH OF PETER THE AGREAT (1703-1725) Galina P. Chudesova*11G.P St Petersburg National Research University of Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics (ITMO University) St Petersburg, Russia Keywords: architecture, St Petersburg, maximaphily, Cabin of Peter the Great 1. Introduction In recent decades, there has been increasing interest in the House of Romanov. An almost total absence of information on the life and activities of the members of this dy- nasty during the Soviet period led to an explosion of interest in this theme after the col- lapse of the USSR. In the post-Soviet period, a stream of literature about the Romanov dynasty looded society, focusing on the architects of that time as creators of particular architectural monuments. As a result, during the translation of collective knowledge, information about the role of the monarchs in creating the architectural heritage of St. Petersburg is practically absent. The present article offers an unusual way of looking at St Petersburg. This is the irst in the series of articles entitled “Architectural Chronicle of St Petersburg”, devoted to deining the contribution each monarch made to the development of the city. The aspects relating to the formation of social memory in society and its implications for the future have been suficiently studied in the historical and philosophical sense, therefore, the author of the paper has considered any scientiic insights unnecessary. Of all the approaches scientists have taken in studying heritage, the author is closest to the informative approach proposed by Ya.K. Rebane and further developed by such scientists as V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME Security &Defence M
    June MARITIME 2021 a7.50 Security D 14974 E &Defence MSD From the Sea and Beyond ISSN 1617-7983 • Key Developments in... • Amphibious Warfare www.maritime-security-defence.com • • Asia‘s Power Balance MITTLER • European Submarines June 2021 • Port Security REPORT NAVAL GROUP DESIGNS, BUILDS AND MAINTAINS SUBMARINES AND SURFACE SHIPS ALL AROUND THE WORLD. Leveraging this unique expertise and our proven track-record in international cooperation, we are ready to build and foster partnerships with navies, industry and knowledge partners. Sovereignty, Innovation, Operational excellence : our common future will be made of challenges, passion & engagement. POWER AT SEA WWW.NAVAL-GROUP.COM - Design : Seenk Naval Group - Crédit photo : ©Naval Group, ©Marine Nationale, © Ewan Lebourdais NAVAL_GROUP_AP_2020_dual-GB_210x297.indd 1 28/05/2021 11:49 Editorial Hard Choices in the New Cold War Era The last decade has seen many of the foundations on which post-Cold War navies were constructed start to become eroded. The victory of the United States and its Western Allies in the unfought war with the Soviet Union heralded a new era in which navies could forsake many of the demands of Photo: author preparing for high intensity warfare. Helping to ensure the security of the maritime shipping networks that continue to dominate global trade and the vast resources of emerging EEZs from asymmetric challenges arguably became many navies’ primary raison d’être. Fleets became focused on collabora- tive global stabilisation far from home and structured their assets accordingly. Perhaps the most extreme example of this trend has been the German Navy’s F125 BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG class frig- ates – hugely sophisticated and expensive ships designed to prevail only in lower threat environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Afanasyeva V.Pdf (5.070Mb)
    Logistics and Transport BE 303 E Supply chain of the Shtokman field development project by Veronika Afanasyeva Spring 2009 Abstract Supply chains are always fairly complex, and each industry’s chain has its own quirks and characteristics. The strategic nature of the product makes the oil and gas supply chain distinct from other industries. The given work sets a task to investigate the supply chain in oil and gas on the example of the Shtokman gas and condensate field development project. It is quite a challenging mission if to take into consideration the size of the project and its unique character. The given research is conducted to develop and extend the supply chain theory in oil and gas industry. The research objectives lead to use the theory-oriented type of research with stress on theory testing. Under these circumstances, the single-case study method and semi- structured interviews as a primary source of data are chosen. To build the entire supply chain of the Shtokman project there is a need to describe it first. The history of the field exploration, selection of partners, engineering concept of the project are reflected in the empirical part. Additionally, the project’s description includes the transportation system and marketing strategy of natural gas and LNG distribution. Moreover, the environmental and political aspects of the project which are essential for oil and gas field development find its reflection in the practical part of the work. The analysis of the project with regard to the received from interviews data and other reliable sources of information helps to build the supply chain in the Shtokman project and put value on the supply chain integration and cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea
    FNI Report 7/2008 Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe [email protected][email protected] Report commissioned by the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association September 2008 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2008 Title Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea: Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Publication Type and Number Pages FNI-Report 7/2008 26 Authors ISBN Arild Moe and Lars Rowe 978-82-7613-530-5-print version 978-82-7613-531-2-electronic version Project ISSN 0879 1504-9744 Abstract Presently most attention in the Barents Sea is given to the Shtokman project. Experience from development of this field, where there are still many uncertainties, will have large consequences for the further development program and relations with foreign companies. The exploration activity going on is fairly limited, but over the last few years there has been a struggle over licenses and control over exploration capacity. In the medium term the goal of rapid development of the Arctic continental shelf has become intertwined with a comprehensive government effort to modernise the domestic shipbuilding industry to make it able to cover most of the needs offshore. With the shipbuilding industry in a deep crisis these goals are not fully reconcilable. Russia will either have to accept more foreign involvement, or scale down its offshore ambitions. We believe a combination of the two alternatives is likely.
    [Show full text]