Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in an Experimental Island System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in an Experimental Island System Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in an experimental island system Dissertation to obtain the Dr. sc. agr. In the Ph. D. Program for Agricultural Sciences in Göttingen (PAG) At the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany Presented by Hagen Andert Born in Görlitz (Germany) Göttingen, September 2017 D 7 1. Referentin/Referent: Prof. Dr. Teja Tscharntke 2. Korreferentin/Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Christoph Scherber Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15. November 2017 2 To Darja, Arnt and Lea, and those, who always keep the bright lantern burning in dark nights. 3 Alles Wissen und alle Vermehrung unseres Wissens endet nicht mit einem Schlusspunkt, sondern mit Fragezeichen. [All knowledge and all multiplication of our knowledge does not end with a final point, but with question marks.] Hermann Hesse (1877-1962) 4 Contents CHAPTER 1: .............................................................................................................................. 7 General Introduction .................................................................................................................. 7 GENERAL INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 8 STUDY REGION AND EXPERIMENTAL ISLAND SYSTEM ..................................... 9 The German barrier island Spiekeroog .................................................................................. 9 Experimental Islands – the BEFmate project ....................................................................... 11 Research Objectives ............................................................................................................. 14 Chapter Outline .................................................................................................................... 14 References ............................................................................................................................ 16 CHAPTER 2: ............................................................................................................................ 19 A barrier island perspective on species-area-relationships ...................................................... 19 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 20 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 21 Material and Methods ....................................................................................................... 22 Study area ............................................................................................................................. 22 Island physiognomy ............................................................................................................. 23 Plant and animal biodiversity data ....................................................................................... 24 Statistical Analyses .............................................................................................................. 24 Results .................................................................................................................................. 27 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 28 References ............................................................................................................................ 31 SUPPORTING INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 35 CHAPTER 3: ............................................................................................................................ 51 Colonization and taxon shift in an experimental island system ............................................... 51 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 52 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 53 Material and Methods ....................................................................................................... 54 Study area ............................................................................................................................. 54 Experimental islands and sampling design .......................................................................... 54 Arthropod sampling .............................................................................................................. 54 Statistical Analyses .............................................................................................................. 56 Results .............................................................................................................................. 58 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 61 References ........................................................................................................................ 64 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 68 CHAPTER 4: ............................................................................................................................ 69 Diversity of decomposing flies and carcass decay in experimental salt-marsh islands of the North Sea, Germany ................................................................................................................. 69 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 70 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 71 Material and Methods ....................................................................................................... 72 Study area ............................................................................................................................. 72 Experimental Design ............................................................................................................ 73 Soil arthropod extraction ...................................................................................................... 76 Animal identification ............................................................................................................ 76 5 Statistical Analyses .............................................................................................................. 76 Results .............................................................................................................................. 78 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 84 References ........................................................................................................................ 87 SUPPORTING INFORMATION .................................................................................... 92 1. DNA extraction .................................................................................................................... 93 2. PCR ...................................................................................................................................... 94 3. Sequencing ........................................................................................................................... 95 APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................. 99 A1 – Complete R-Code for Chapter 4 .................................................................................. 99 THESIS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 114 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ....................................................................................................... 117 PUBLICATIONS AND SCIENTIFIC TALKS ..................................................................... 121 PUBLICATIONS ............................................................................................................... 121 CONFERENCE CONTRIBUTIONS AND SCIENTIFIC TALKS .................................. 121 CURRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................................................ 123 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 125 THESIS DECLERATIONS ................................................................................................... 127 Decleration of the author’s own contribution to manuscripts with multiple authors ......... 127 Declaration plagiarism ....................................................................................................... 127 6 CHAPTER 1: General Introduction 7 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Island systems have become one of the most important model systems in ecology for the last decades (Losos and Ricklefs, 2010, MacArthur and Wilson, 1967). Their discrete and isolated nature make islands a useful tool for ecological and evolutionary studies (Whittaker and Fernández-Palacios, 2007) and therefore
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Burial of a Body on the Growth of Blowfly Larvae and Pupate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online 1 The colonisation of remains by the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) (Diptera: Muscidae) Alan Gunn* School of Natural Sciences & Psychology, John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT In the field, the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) only colonised buried baits in June, July and August. The two-species co- occurred on baits buried at 5cm but only M. prolapsa colonised baits buried at 10cm. Other species of insect were seldom recovered from buried baits regardless of the presence or absence of Muscina larvae. In the laboratory, both M. stabulans and M. prolapsa preferentially colonised liver baits on the soil surface compared to those buried at 5cm. Baits buried in dry soil were not colonised by either species whilst waterlogged soil severely reduced colonisation but did not prevent it entirely. Dry liver presented on the soil surface was colonised and supported growth to adulthood but if there was no surrounding medium in which the larvae could burrow then they died within 24 hours. M. stabulans showed a consistent preference for ovipositing on decaying liver rather than fresh liver, even when it had decayed for 41 days. The results for M. prolapsa were more variable but it was also capable of developing on both fresh and very decayed remains. Blood-soaked soil and dead slugs and snails stimulated egg-laying by both species and supported larval growth to adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Calyptratae
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile DOMÍNGUEZ, M. CECILIA; ROIG-JUÑENT, SERGIO A. Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 84, núm. 1, 2011, pp. 65-82 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944297005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FANNIIDAE (DIPTERA) 65 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84: 65-82, 2011 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Análisis biogeográfico histórico de la familia Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), con referencia especial a las especies australes del genero Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) usando análisis de dipersion-vicarianza M. CECILIA DOMÍNGUEZ* & SERGIO A. ROIG-JUÑENT Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), Centro Científico Tecnologico (CCT-CONICET, Mendoza), Av. Adrián Ruiz Leal s/n, Parque Gral. San Martin, Mendoza, Argentina, CC: 507, CP: 5500 *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to achieve a hypothesis explaining the biogeographical history of the family Fanniidae, especially that of the species from Patagonia, the Neotropics, Australia, and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Proefschrift R. Kats
    University of Groningen Common eiders Somateria mollissima in the Netherlands Kats, Romke Kerst Hendrik IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2007 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Kats, R. K. H. (2007). Common eiders Somateria mollissima in the Netherlands: The rise and fall of breeding and wintering populations in relation to stocks of shellfish. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 11-10-2021 Common Eiders Somateria mollissima in the Netherlands: The rise and fall of breeding and wintering populations in relation to the stocks of shellfish The research presented in this thesis was conducted at IMARES on Texel (formerly know as IBN and Alterra-Texel) and supported by Alterra, IMARES, the Animal Ecology Group (part of the Centre for Evolutionary and Ecological Studies of the University of Groningen), SOVON, NIOZ, and NWO.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldenburger Jahrbuch
    Landesbibliothek Oldenburg Digitalisierung von Drucken Oldenburger Jahrbuch Oldenburger Landesverein für Geschichte, Natur- und Heimatkunde Oldenburg, 1957- Klaus-Michael Exo, Christiane Ketzenberg & Ute Bradter: Bestand, Phänologie und räumliche Verteilung von Wasser- und Watervögeln im friesischen Rückseitenwatt 1992 - 1995 urn:nbn:de:gbv:45:1-3267 Oldenburger Jahrbuch 100, 2000 337 Klaus-Michael Exo, Christiane Ketzenberg & Ute Bradter Bestand, Phänologie und räumliche Verteilung von Wasser- und Watvögeln im friesischen Rückseitenwatt 1992-1995 1. Einleitung Mehr als 30 Küstenvogelarten mit annähernd 400.000 Brutpaaren nutzen das Wat¬ tenmeer alljährlich zur Brut ( Fleet et al. 1994). Auch wenn das Wattenmeer damit das bedeutendste Brutgebiet für Küstenvögel in Mitteleuropa ist, beruht seine über¬ ragende internationale Bedeutung für Vögel in erster Linie auf seiner Funktion als „Drehscheibe" und „Tankstelle" auf dem ostatlantischen Zugweg. Ca. 10-12 Mio. Wasser- und Watvögel - meist Brutvögel der Arktis und Subarktis - nutzen das Ökosystem Wattenmeer alljährlich als Rast-, Mauser- und/oder Überwinterungsge¬ biet ( Meltofte et al. 1994). Für mindestens 52 geografisch getrennte Populationen von 41 Wasser- und Watvogelarten hat das Wattenmeer im Sinne der Ramsar-Kon¬ vention internationale Bedeutung. - Die 1971 in Ramsar/Iran unterzeichnete Kon¬ vention zum Schutz von Feuchtgebieten internationaler Bedeutung besagt, dass einem Feuchtgebiet internationale Bedeutung zukommt, wenn es entweder regel¬ mäßig 1 % der Vögel einer Population oder eines definierten Zugweges beherbergt oder aber mehr als 20.000 Wasser- und Watvögel (z. B. Davis 1996, Mitlacher 1997). - Vielen Arten bietet das Wattenmeer eine der wenigen Möglichkeiten, ihre Energie¬ reserven auf dem Frühjahrszug in die Brutgebiete (Fleimzug) wie auch auf dem Herbstzug in die Winterquartiere (Wegzug) aufzufüllen (z. B.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fanniidae and Muscidae (Diptera) from Lithuania
    NAUJOS IR RETOS LIETUVOS VABZDŽI Ų R ŪŠYS. 21 tomas 129 NEW RECORDS OF FANNIIDAE AND MUSCIDAE (DIPTERA) FROM LITHUANIA ERIKAS LUTOVINOVAS 1, RUDOLF ROZKOŠNÝ 2 Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlá řská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, the Czech Republic. E-mail: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Introduction Fanniidae and Muscidae are closely related families that chiefly are inhabitants of natural and semi-natural habitats and only a small part of them are adapted to cultural ecosystems. Nevertheless, several species belong even to the well known synanthropic forms that have a certain hygienic, medical and veterinary importance. Altogether 11 species of Fanniidae and 119 species of Muscidae were recently treated in the national checklist of flies and one additional publication (Pakalniškis et al. , 2006; Lutovinovas, 2008). Further faunistic news are presented herewith. Material and Methods The basic part of the material is deposited in the collection of the first author of this report and the extant of that in Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoological Museum (Lithuania). The material was collected in 1996–2008 episodically. Sweeping and Malaise traps were used in the field (in the state protected areas mainly), while less number of specimens were obtained from indoors in many places and by several collectors. The flies were identified using keys to the European species (Rozkošný et al., 1997; Gregor et al ., 2002). The list of Lithuanian species was compiled from two recent sources (Pakalniškis et al. , 2006; Lutovinovas, 2008). The taxonomy of both families follows Pont (2004). List of localities Jurbarkas district Viešvil ė env., Viešvil ė Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea (Germany) Including Information on the Culicids (Diptera
    LüHKEN et at.: 87-95 Studia dipterotogica 1 6 (2009) Heft 1 /2 . ISSN 0945'3954 Mosquito species on the Island of Baltrum in the southern North Sea (Germany) including information on the culicids from the Islands of Langeoog and Mellum (Diptera: Culicioäe) [Die Stechmucken-Arten der Insel Baltrum in der südlichen Nordsee (Deutschland) einschließlich Informationen zu den Culiciden der Inseln Langeoog und Mellum (Diptera: Culicidae)l by RenKe LÜHKEN, E,IIen KIEL, Tammo LIECKWEG and RoIf NIEDRINGHAUS Oldenburg (Germany) Abstract During the summer of 2008, the species composition of mosquitocs (Diptera. Culictdae) rvas studied for three East Frisian lslands in northern German-v. On the Island of Baltrum,4T pools and ditches rvithin a salt marsh and dune complex rr ere sampled rvith sweep nets approximately even' t\\'o ueeks fiom,.\pril to Jull'2008. Adult mosquitoes rverc collected wrth a fixed light trap tiont July' to November 2008. Additionalll/' random samples rvere taken from comparable waterbodies on the islands ofLangeoog and Mellum ber$een July and September 2008. A total ofnrne tara rvere identified . .Anopheles maculipennis complex, Anopheles claviger com- plex,Ochlerotatuscaspius(P.tl.rs. l77l).Ochlerotalusdetitus (Her-lo.w, 1833),Ochlerotatus dorsalls (MercE^- , | 830). Ochterotalils rlslicrs (Ross t, 1790), Culex piplens LruN.q.sus, l7 58, Culex torrentiutll N{.rxrrNt. 1925. and Culiseta annulala (ScumNr, 1776).Five species were recorded for the first time on the Ea-st F'risian Islands.. Ochlerotatus caspius, Oc. detritus. Oc. dorsalis, Oc. r.ttsticus and C.uler lorrenlitol. Four mosquito taxa were recorded for the first time on Baltrum: ,lnopheles nnculipennis contpler, An.
    [Show full text]