DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Issues a Brief Overview of Transportation Issues Which Are of Potential Interest to Residents of Sandy Hill and Where to Go for More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Issues a Brief Overview of Transportation Issues Which Are of Potential Interest to Residents of Sandy Hill and Where to Go for More Information Transportation Issues A brief overview of transportation issues which are of potential interest to residents of Sandy Hill and where to go for more information. Comments or questions on any of the issue discussed below can be directed to [email protected] Action Sandy Hill participates as a member in the City Centre Coalition (CCC). The CCC consists of 13 different downtown citizen‟s groups and focuses on supporting community-oriented transportation planning that emphasizes walking, cycling, and transit. The CCC opposes road construction and expansion intended to accommodate peak-hour car demand particularly for projects within the greenbelt or which are intended to increase the peak hour capacity leading to the urban core. Such roads only induce environmentally and community-destructive car use. The CCC maintains a website which is an excellent resource for tracking ongoing transportation planning reports and activities in the City and providing a record of ongoing CCC activities. www.ccc-ottawa.ca John Verbaas – Jun 2012 B. Ottawa-wide Issues with Sandy Hill Implications New Ottawa River Crossing Study (East End Bridge) Inter-Provincial Transit Study Alta Vista Corridor (AVC) Queensway Expansion to 8 Lanes East of Kent Street Ottawa LRT Rapid Transit (Downtown Ottawa Transit Tunnel - DOTT) Lansdowne Park Re-development (Lansdowne Partnership Plan) Transportation Master Plan 2008 Rideau/Sussex/Colonel-By Intersection Enhancement Study Other Useful Links New Ottawa River Crossing Study (East End Bridge) The NCC together with the Ontario and Quebec Ministries of Transport have commissioned a series studies to determine the best possible location for a new crossing of the Ottawa River. The Action Sandy Hill transportation representative is an active member of the Public Consultation Group (PCG) whose role is to represent various community interests. Phase 1 of this study concluded in Jan 2009 and recommended that the best location for a new crossing would be Kettle Island, connecting on the Ottawa side via the Aviation Parkway to the 174-417 split intersection. Negative reaction to this was swift and another study was then initiated which re-introduced two of the potential crossings (about 6km further east down Highway 174) which Phase 1 of the study had discounted. Further study was then broken into 2 phases. Phase 2A‟s purpose was to consult with communities on what will be the process to be used in phase 2B which will narrow down from the now 3 potential crossing locations to a single preferred location. The reason for Phase 2A was that communities in the east end felt that they had not been given sufficient opportunity to comment on what evaluation criteria were used to perform the original Phase 1 evaluation and recommendation. Phase 2A completed in June 2010 and Phase 2B started in the summer of 2011. Phase 2B will lead to the choice of a single preferred location. This decision is expected in late summer/early fall 2012 and will then be followed by a detailed design and environmental assessment of the preferred crossing would run into 2013. The stated main purpose for a new crossing is to divert trucks out of the Waller-Rideau-King Edward corridor and to accommodate forecast increases in inter-provincial travel demand over the next 50 year time horizon. The eventual construction of a new crossing could be of significant benefit to Sandy Hill, however there are some concerns over just how much traffic (both car and truck) may be diverted out of downtown by any potential new crossing. Phase 1 of the study concluded that around 30-40% of the trucks currently travelling down Waller, Rideau and King Edward would be „attracted‟ to and prefer to take a new crossing in the east end. That leaves 60% of the trucks still downtown and that will be some 10 years from now and after spending 500m$ (the cost of the crossing + approach roadway changes as estimated in the Phase 1 study). Will it be possible at that time to go one step further and to ban trucks from Rideau/KingEdward and force the remaining 60% to take the long roundabout route over an east end bridge? To date no comprehensive study has been performed which estimates the potential increase in cost imposed on the business community of such a downtown truck ban. Similarly no consultation with business and trucking groups has taken place to discuss the impact of a regulated diversion of all inter-provincial trucks to an east end bridge. Lastly, the act of forcing all trucks to a potential new east end bridge has the side effect of moving the current 2500 trucks per day onto the City of Gatineau street that would serve as the access to the new bridge. This simply moves the truck problem from Ottawa to Gatineau and the City of Gatineau council has already passed a resolution stating that it will be unacceptable for all truck traffic to be moved from King Edward to Gatineau‟s streets. If there is a risk that forcing all trucks to use a new east end bridge will not be politically or practically possible then maybe we should be looking for a different solution to this problem than a new east end bridge? A key issue at stake here is the relative weighting of the requirements on a new crossing for getting trucks out of downtown vs simply adding new peak hour inter-provincial car based commuting capacity. The Action Sandy Hill transportation representative is involved in keeping forward momentum going on this initiative and to ensure that the best possible solution to reduce the downtown cut-through truck and commuter traffic is found. Further details can be found at the web link: www.ncrcrossings.ca Other groups have been formed who are opposed to some or all aspects of a potential east end bridge and have formed their own websites to explain their positions. Some of these can be found here: http://www.ssd-ottawa.ca http://www.stopthebridge.org/ http://commonsensecrossings.com/ Inter-Provincial Transit Study In 2009 the NCC launched a study (together with City of Ottawa and Gatineau) to recommend how to improve the quality and efficiency of transit across the Ottawa River. This is of particular interest to Sandy Hill because today as many as 150 STO buses per hour in rush hour travel south on King Edward Ave and then west along Rideau St, significantly reducing quality of life in these areas. A better integrated inter- provincial transit system has the potential to take the vast majority of these buses off these roadways. It also has the potential to reduce the volume of cars commuting through Sandy Hill to and from the Macdonald-Cartier bridge. The Sandy Hill transportation representative is an active participant in the PCG (Public Consultation Group) guiding this study. The first phase of this study which was completed in the fall of 2009 involved consulting various community groups on what they saw as the issues and priorities to be addressed in improving inter-provincial transit in this region. In February 2010 a brief presentation was made to the PCG group outlining a list of possible transit improvements in the short, medium, and longer term. Of particular interest to PCG group members was the longer term potential „infrastructure‟ options. Six different alternatives were tabled which included the following options: a) bringing STO buses across a (current unused rail-based) Prince of Wales bridge (which would need to be substantially altered for buses) and transferring passengers to the new Ottawa LRT system at Bayview (after it is operational in 2019). b) The reverse of (a)…Once Ottawa has a North-South LRT running (post 2018) to extend it‟s northern terminus across the Prince of Wales bridge to Gatineau where STO passengers would transfer from buses to the LRT. c) Like (b) except this North-South LRT with every other north-south train crossing the bridge to Gatineau alternating with the next north-south train which would merge onto the Ottawa east-west LRT line and continue through downtown Ottawa d) Implementation of a loop based rail system between Gatineau and Ottawa downtown which would probably use the Portage bridge and Alexandra bridges e) An alternating Ottawa LRT line…this time the east-west line…. from Blair station where every other train would turn north at Bayview to cross the Prince of Wales bridge into Gatineau where Gatineau passengers would transfer to STO buses there. This would alternate with regular Ottawa east-west LRTs which would travel the full east-west line from Blair to the Ottawa far western terminus f) Extending Ottawa‟s downtown tunnel with a branch that travels north under lowertown to cross the river into Gatineau. Ottawa‟s future north-south LRT would (after travelling through Ottawa downtown) branch off north to serve downtown Gatineau. What has not yet been made available to the public is any kind of data or analysis that could be used to evaluate between the advantages and disadvantages of each of these options. Information such as anticipated ridership analysis, capital costs, operating costs, etc is required. The study website as of Sept 2010 was missing any kind of visibility of the upcoming study steps, deliverables, or timelines. It can be found at this address: http://www.interprovincial-transit- strategy.ca/ As of Sep 2011, indications from the NCC were that the study was to be completed by the end of 2011. This was delayed again and as of writing in Jun 2012 there is no visibility of when any recommendations are to be brought forward. Alta Vista Corridor (AVC) For some years now the City of Ottawa has had listed as one of its top priority new road projects a corridor joining Conroy Road at Walkley, through an empty corridor north of the Ottawa Hospital connecting to a re- designed interchange of Nicholas Avenue at the Queensway.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clemow-Monkland Driveway and Linden Terrace Heritage Conservation District Plan
    DRAFT DECEMBER 9, 2019 CLEMOW-MONKLAND DRIVEWAY AND LINDEN TERRACE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN City of Ottawa Planning, Infrastructure and Economic Development ottawa.ca/clemow2 December 2019 CONTENTS Part A: HCD Overview ...............................................................................................................1 I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN .............................................................................................................................1 II. HOW TO READ THE PLAN .........................................................................................................................2 1.0 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Rationale for Designation: Summary of Findings from the HCD Study .................................................................3 2.0 Policy Framework ..................................................................................................................................3 Ontario Heritage Act ............................................................................................................................................3 Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 ........................................................................................................................4 City of Ottawa Official Plan .................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Historic Context
    Architectural Rejuvenation Project URBAN AND HISTORIC CONTEXT Barry Padolsky Associates Inc., Architects, Urban Design and Heritage Consultants February 13, 2015 Aerial view of National Arts Centre (2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................................2 Urban and Historic Context........................................................................................................2 . The Holt/Bennett Plan ................................................................................................................4 The Gréber Plan .........................................................................................................................6 The Parkin Plan ...........................................................................................................................8 Architecture and National Identity: the Centennial Projects .......................................................9 NAC: The Architectural Challenge ............................................................................................10 The Architectural Response .....................................................................................................13 Architectural Style: Polite “Brutalism” ......................................................................................16 Re-inventing “Brutalism”..........................................................................................................17 NCC Canada’s
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]; [email protected]
    April 20, 2016 VIA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Minister McKenna and Minister Joly, We write to you today to advocate for increased access to the Rideau Canal for canoers and kayakers in central Ottawa. Parks Canada currently provides docks at the downtown Ottawa locks, at the Hartwell Locks (near Carleton University), and at Dow’s Lake. We feel that the addition of docks between downtown and Dow’s Lake would greatly increase the accessibility of the canal in the summer. It would provide more opportunities for Ottawa residents and tourists to enjoy paddling through an urban centre and to make use of this UNESCO heritage site. In addition, by facilitating the use of non-motorized watercraft, environmentally-sustainable and healthy leisure activities would be promoted. We are interested in collaborating with Parks Canada and the National Capital Commission on a pilot project that would see two additional launching points for a summer - one on each side of the canal in the Glebe and Old Ottawa East. On the west (Glebe) side, we would recommend Patterson Creek or at Fifth Avenue (just south of the Canal Ritz restaurant). (This second location could also be useful for those wanting to visit the revitalized Lansdowne Park.) On the east (Old Ottawa East) side, we would recommend a dock at Clegg, Herridge or Hazel. There would be a floating dock in each location to facilitate safe boat launches. After the summer, we would recommend an evaluation of the project and consideration as to whether it would be possible to establish more launching points in future years.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II: Clemow Estate Heritage Study: Area Analysis and Recommendations
    Phase II: Clemow Estate Heritage Study: area analysis and recommendations 1 Phase II Clemow Estate Heritage Conservation District Study – Area Analysis and Recommendations 1.0 Background In 2004, Ottawa’s City Council recommended undertaking a multi-phased Heritage Conservation Study of three areas of the Glebe surrounding Central Park. The intention was to provide an overall understanding of the history and cultural heritage character of the area and, to determine if a Heritage Conservation District would be an appropriate planning tool to recognize and protect the area by managing change over time. In 2011, the first phase of the study resulted in the designation of the Clemow Estate East Heritage Conservation District under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. For Phase II, Council’s original direction was to study the properties adjacent to Linden Terrace and Patterson Creek to the Rideau Canal. However, the research for Phase I indicated that the original Clemow Estate also included the western section of Clemow Avenue from Bronson Avenue to Bank Street. The research also showed that there was a historical and physical association between Clemow and Monkland Avenues, as part of Ottawa’s parkway and driveway network. Accordingly, the study area that was part of the original terms of reference was amended to include Monkland Avenue. 2.0 Description of the Study Area The Phase II study area includes three streets in the Glebe neighborhood: Clemow Avenue between Bronson Avenue and Bank Street, Monkland Avenue and Linden Terrace between O’Connor Street and the Rideau Canal. The area also includes Patterson Creek and its associated park land.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Take-Away Meal Schedule
    Take Away Meals available for people in need in downtown Ottawa Time Places Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Breakfast 8 am Odawa ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 8:30 to 11:30 am Operation Come Home ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 9 to 10 am Parkdale Food Centre ✓ 9:30 to 10:30 am St. Joe’s Women’s Centre ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Lunch 9:30 am to Noon Capital City Mission ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 11 am to 1:30 pm Centre Espoir Sophie ✓ 11 am to 1 pm St. Luke’s Table ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 11:30 am to 1 pm Centre 507 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Noon to 1 pm St. Joe’s Women’s Centre ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Noon Odawa ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 12:45 to 1:45 pm Ottawa Mission ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Noon Parkdale Food Centre ✓ 1 to 3 pm Ottawa Innercity Ministries ✓ ✓ Dinner 3:30 to 5 pm In From the Cold ✓ 4 to 5 pm Out of the Cold ✓ 4 to 5:15 pm St. Joe’s Supper Table ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 4:30 to 6 pm Centre 507 ✓ 4:30 to 6:30 pm Centre Espoir Sophie ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 6 to 9 pm Shepherds of Good Hope ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 7:30 to 8:30 pm A Meal to Go ✓ 9 to 11:30 pm Restoring Hope ✓ ✓ COVID19_52 10 to 11:30 pm Restoring Hope ✓ ✓ ✓ - 2020 Addresses listed on back Take Away Meals available for people in need in downtown Ottawa A Meal to Go In From the Cold 152 Metcalfe Street Ottawa Innercity Ministries 429 Parkdale Avenue (enter at the front doors of St. Peter and St. 391 Gladstone Avenue (Parkdale United Church Gladstone Avenue and th Paul’s Anglican Church - corner of Metcalfe (between Bank Street and Kent Street) Parkdale Avenue).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability & Storm Water Management the Other Perspective Phasing Living Machine
    SUSTAINABILITY & STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FLOOD CONTROL MARSH PERMANENT POOL Example of a wetland in Jeifang park, Wuhan, China. Typical section of an extended detention wetland. The canal once penetrated into the site and the proposed wetland is created as a trace of this past. Wetlands are a man- made natural filtration system that can manage the surface water of a site. The water is sufficiently purified for healthy fish species and people can fish out of its final basin. Wetlands are known for their very diverse ecologies and can be used as a very effective educational tool as well as an integral element of the park experience. PHASING LIVING MACHINE Wastewater can be processed within a greenhouse Lansdowne park can be constructed over three main phases, each spaced apart in order to structure with vegetative technologies known as ‘Living secure financing over time. The park functions very well after Phase I and if the other phases Machines’ . The Living Machine would serve as a great were not to be constructed, it would still be a complete and successful project. option for the urban mixed use area north of the sta- dium. These systems mimic natural treatment processes, Phase I recreating a functional ecology within a system of plant- - The immediate need for Lansdowne’s Front-Lawn is to transform it from a parking lot to ed water tanks. Due to their visibility and the integra- a fully functional park. A clear continuity from the Rideau Canal, through the Parks Canada tion of various plant, crustacean and even fish species and NCC lands is achieved even without moving the Queen Elizabeth Driveway and con- into the treatment chain, the demonstration potential of structing the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Portraits Book
    HH Beechwood is proud to be The National Cemetery of Canada and a National Historic Site Life Celebrations ♦ Memorial Services ♦ Funerals ♦ Catered Receptions ♦ Cremations ♦ Urn & Casket Burials ♦ Monuments Beechwood operates on a not-for-profit basis and is not publicly funded. It is unique within the Ottawa community. In choosing Beechwood, many people take comfort in knowing that all funds are used for the maintenance, en- hancement and preservation of this National Historic Site. www.beechwoodottawa.ca 2017- v6 Published by Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services Ottawa, ON For all information requests please contact Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery and Cremation Services 280 Beechwood Avenue, Ottawa ON K1L8A6 24 HOUR ASSISTANCE 613-741-9530 • Toll Free 866-990-9530 • FAX 613-741-8584 [email protected] The contents of this book may be used with the written permission of Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services www.beechwoodottawa.ca Owned by The Beechwood Cemetery Foundation and operated by The Beechwood Cemetery Company eechwood, established in 1873, is recognized as one of the most beautiful and historic cemeteries in Canada. It is the final resting place for over 75,000 Canadians from all walks of life, including im- portant politicians such as Governor General Ramon Hnatyshyn and Prime Minister Sir Robert Bor- den, Canadian Forces Veterans, War Dead, RCMP members and everyday Canadian heroes: our families and our loved ones. In late 1980s, Beechwood began producing a small booklet containing brief profiles for several dozen of the more significant and well-known individuals buried here. Since then, the cemetery has grown in national significance and importance, first by becoming the home of the National Military Cemetery of the Canadian Forces in 2001, being recognized as a National Historic Site in 2002 and finally by becoming the home of the RCMP National Memorial Cemetery in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 2020-P158 to Board of Directors Date 2020-10-06
    Public Submission No. 2020-P158 To Board of Directors For DECISION Date 2020-10-06 Subject/Title Capital Pathway Strategic Plan Summary • To obtain approval of the Board of Directors for the Capital Pathway Strategic Plan. Risk Summary • Limited funding and resources may impact the NCC’s ability to implement the Plan’s recommendations. Recommendation • That the Capital Pathway Strategic Plan be approved pursuant to Section 10 of the National Capital Act. • That the implementation of the Plan be delegated to the Capital Stewardship and Capital Planning Branches, in accordance with their respective mandates. • That applicable projects proposed to implement the Capital Pathway Strategic Plan be reviewed under Section 12 of the National Capital Act and obtain Federal Land Use Approval. Submitted by: Submitted by: Pierre Vaillancourt, A/Vice president, Capital Planning Anne Ménard, Vice president, Capital Stewardship__ Name Name ___________________________________________ __________________________________________ Signature Signature Submission: 2020-P158 Page 1 of 5 Public Submission 1. Strategic Priorities • 2020/21-2024/25 Corporate Plan: o Strategic Direction: Contribute to a thriving, connected and sustainable National Capital Region that inspires Canadians through the planning, development and improvement of the NCC’s assets. o Priority 4: Develop and communicate land use plans and provide timely and effective coordination of federal land use and design in the National Capital Region. • The Plan for Canada’s Capital (2017-2067) – Chapters 4 and 5. • Core Area Sector Plan (2005); Capital Urban Lands Plan (2015); Greenbelt Master Plan (2013); Gatineau Park Master Plan (2005 and forthcoming draft 2020); Ottawa River South Shore Riverfront Park Plan (2018); and Ottawa River North Shore Parklands Plan (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Protected / Public
    Public document Submission No.: 2017-P06e To: Board of Directors For: DECISION Date : 2017-04-05/06 1. TITLE The Ottawa Hospital Land Use and Transaction Approvals (PSPC, AAFC, NCC) 2. PURPOSE OF THE SUBMISSION • To seek approval to transfer federal NILM land from National Capital Commission (NCC) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) to Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC); • To permit PSPC to lease NILM land to The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) for a long term, for the purpose of constructing a new regional health facility. 3. AUTHORITY National Capital Act, Sections 12 and 12.1 4. RECOMMENDATIONS In order to advance the Federal Approval for the use and long term lease of National Interest Land Mass (NILM) located at the Sir John Carling site to The Ottawa Hospital (TOH): • That Federal transaction approval be granted for the transfer of National Capital Commission (NCC) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) NILM lands to Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC); • That Federal Land Use and Transaction approval be granted to PSPC to enter into a long term ground lease with The Ottawa Hospital for the lands required for the new health facility, with conditions as identified in the federal approval document in Appendix 3, and; • That the signature of the Federal Land Use and Transaction Approval document in Appendix 3 be delegated to the Executive Director, Capital Planning Branch. 5. BACKGROUND Following the National Capital Commission’s 2016 site selection review process of federal lands within the urban area of the City of Ottawa, on December 2, 2016, the Minister of Canadian Heritage requested that federal government undertake the Submission: 2017-P06e Page 1 of 4 Public document Submission necessary preparations to make the Carling Avenue (East) site, commonly referred to as the Sir John Carling site, available as the future location of the new Civic Campus of The Ottawa Hospital (TOH).
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services 1 1 Canada gouvernementaux Canada RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: COURIER AND FREIGHT SERVICES Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Date TPSGC E60LM-120020/A 2013-03-05 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Amendment No. - N° modif. Place du Portage , Phase III E60LM-120020 006 Core 0A1 / Noyau 0A1 Gatineau, Québec K1A 0S5 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 lm001.E60LM-120020 GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG PW-$$LM-001-62052 Date of Original Request for Standing Offer 2013-01-25 Revision to a Request for a Standing Offer Date de la demande de l'offre à commandes originale Révision à une demande d'offre à commandes Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin Time Zone Fuseau horaire National Master Standing Offer (NMSO) at - à 02:00 PM on - le 2013-03-11 Eastern Standard Offre à commandes principale et nationale (OCPN) Time EST Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur Jiang, Kevin lm001 The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX the Offer remain the same. (819) 956-3857 ( ) ( ) - Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, les modalités de l'offre demeurent les mêmes. Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Security - Sécurité Raison sociale et adresse du This revision does not change the security requirements of the Offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Rationale Report
    PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT 394 BRONSON AVENUE PIN: 0410-90184 Part Lot 134, Registered Plan 3459 N (BRONSON W.) K1R 6J6 CITY OF OTTAWA APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL PREPARED BY OTTAWA CARLETON CONSTRUCTION 337 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE, OTTAWA, ON, K1S 0R9 AUGUST 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 … Background … page 2 1.2 … Design Intent … page 2 2. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 2.1 … Application for Site Plan Control … page 3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 … Community Attributes … page 4 3.2 … Current Site Context … page 6 4. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 4.1 … Design Summary … page 7 4.2 … Proposed Occupancy … page 8 4.3 … Building Features … page 8 4.4 … Materiality … page 9 5. LEGISLATION FRAMEWORK 5.1 … Ontario Provincial Plan … page 12 5.2 … City of Ottawa Official Plan … page 14 5.3 … Zoning By-law Provisions … page 17 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 6.1 … Proposal Summary … page 20 6.2 … Conclusion … page 20 TABLE OF EXHIBITS A​: MAP OF WARD 17 - ‘SOMERSET’ WARD … page 4 B: ​SITE CONTEXT ADJACENT PROPERTIES 392, 396 BRONSON AVE. W … page 5 C: ​SITE CONTEXT ADJACENT PROPERTIES, BRONSON AVE. E … page 5 D: ​394 BRONSON AVE. W - CURRENT SITE CONTEXT AERIAL VIEW, GEO OTTAWA 2017 … page 6 E: ​394 BRONSON AVE. - CURRENT SITE CONTEXT BIRDSEYE VIEW (WEST) … page 7 F: ​394 BRONSON AVE. - CURRENT SITE CONTEXT STREET VIEW … page 7 G: ​394 BRONSON AVENUE, PROPOSED SITE PLAN, SOMA STUDIOS 2018 … page 8 H: ​394 BRONSON AVENUE - PROPOSED FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS, SOMA STUDIOS 2018 … page 10 I: ​394 BRONSON AVENUE - INTERIOR SIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH), SOMA STUDIOS 2018 … page 10 J: ​394 BRONSON AVENUE - INTERIOR ELEVATION (NORTH), SOMA STUDIOS 2018 … page 11 K: ​ZONING MAP 394 BRONSON AVENUE, GEO OTTAWA 2017 … page 18 OTTAWA CARLETON CONSTRUCTION​ : 1500 BANK STREET : OTTAWA : K1H 1B8 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for a Standing Offer Agreement (Rfso) Maintenance & Conservation of Ncc Cultural Assets National Capital Commission (Ncc) Tender File # Nr209
    REQUEST FOR A STANDING OFFER AGREEMENT (RFSO) MAINTENANCE & CONSERVATION OF NCC CULTURAL ASSETS NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION (NCC) TENDER FILE # NR209 REQUEST FOR A STANDING OFFER (RFSO) ADDRESS ENQUIRIES TO: BID DEADLINE: Nathalie Rheault, Sr. Contract Officer [email protected] June 9, 2021 at 3:00pm EDT [email protected] RETURN TO: Submit your proposal, price, including this Subject line of e-mails must make cover page and return to: reference to the NCC tender number: Paper copy and faxes are no longer accepted. All bids NR209 Maintenance & Conservation of must be forwarded to this email address only. Non- compliance with this requirement will result in NCC Cultural Assets disqualification of your tender. Note: the email attachment size is set at a maximum of 150 MB. This page is to be dated, signed and returned with your proposal, thereby acknowledging having read, understood and accepted the Terms of Reference of this RFSO which includes all other attachments referred to herein. We hereby OFFER to sell and/or supply to the National Capital Commission upon the terms and conditions set out herein, the supplies and/or services listed above and on any attached sheets at the submitted price(s). Consultant’s Name & Address Print Name Signature Tel: Email(s): Date ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I/We __________________________________ acknowledge receipt of the following addendums and Bidder to enter the number of addendums have included for the requirement of it/them in my/our issued (i.e. #1, #2, etc.) if any. tendered price: 202-40 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Canada K1P 1C7 40, rue Elgin, pièce 202, Ottawa, Canada K1P 1C7 Page 1 of 7 REQUEST FOR A STANDING OFFER AGREEMENT (RFSO) MAINTENANCE & CONSERVATION OF NCC CULTURAL ASSETS NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION (NCC) TENDER FILE # NR209 1.0 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 1.1 Submit your technical proposal and financial proposal to provide services for the National Capital Commission (referred to as the "Commission" or the "NCC"), as described in the attached Terms of Reference document.
    [Show full text]