DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly Distr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly Distr UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/4/25/Add.1 5 April 2007 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH Human Rights Council Fourth session Agenda item 2 IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251 OF 15 MARCH 2006 ENTITLED “HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL” Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro Despouy Addendum Situations in specific countries or territories∗ ∗The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.07-12812 A/HRC/4/25/Add.1 Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION 1-7 4-6 II. STATISTICAL DATA 8 7-9 Figure 1. Thematic issues addressed in allegations brought to the Special Rapporteur’s attention and transmitted to Governments in 2006 Figure 2. Type of communication sent to Governments by the Special Rapporteur in 2006 Figure 3. Communication sent by the Special Rapporteur and Governments replies received in 2006 Figure 4. Communication sent by the Special Rapporteur and Governments replies received in the past 3 years Figure 5. Communication sent to Governments by the Special Rapporteur in 2006 by region Figure 6. Communication sent to Governments by the Special Rapporteur in 2006 by gender III. SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND 9-402 10-219 REPLIES RECEIVED Afghanistan 9-16 10-13 Algeria 17-24 13-18 Argentina 25-33 18-26 Australia 34-38 26-29 Azerbaijan 39-41 29-31 Bahrain 42-45 31-33 Bangladesh 46-53 33-39 Belarus 54-57 39-41 Brazil 58-63 41-43 Cambodia 64-66 43-44 Central African Republic 67-69 44-45 Chad 70-72 45-46 Chile 73-76 46-48 China 77-102 49-67 Colombia 103-109 67-72 Cuba 110-113 72-73 Czech Republic 114-116 73-74 Democratic Republic of the Congo 117-122 74-77 Ecuador 123-128 77-82 Egypt 129-142 82-90 Ethiopia 143-147 90-93 Gambia 148-150 93-95 Georgia 151-153 95-96 Germany 154-160 96-100 Greece 161-163 100-101 Guatemala 164-166 101-102 A/HRC/4/25/Add.1 Page 3 Honduras 167-170 102-104 India 171-174 104-105 Indonesia 175-178 105-107 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 179-200 107-119 Iraq 201-209 119-124 Israel 210-219 124-129 Kazakhstan 220-224 129-131 Kyrgyzstan 225-229 131-134 Liberia 230-232 134-135 Malaysia 233-235 135-135 Mexico 236-256 135-146 Moldova 257-261 146-149 Morocco 262-264 149-150 Myanmar 265-272 150-155 Nepal 273-285 155-159 Pakistan 281-285 159-160 Paraguay 286-288 160-161 Peru 289-291 161-162 Philippines 292-297 162-165 Russian Federation 298-315 165-176 Saudi Arabia 316-318 176-176 Serbia 319-321 176-177 Sierra Leone 322-324 177-178 Singapore 325-331 178-182 Sri Lanka 332-334 182-183 Sudan 335-340 183-186 Syrian Arab Republic 341-351 186-191 Tajikistan 352-354 191-192 Thailand 355-358 192-194 Tunisia 359-369 194-200 Turkey 370-374 200-201 United Arab Emirates 375-378 201-203 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 379-380 203-206 United States of America 381-386 206-211 Uzbekistan 387-394 211-216 Yemen 395-398 216-217 Zimbabwe 399-402 217-219 A/HRC/4/25/Add.1 Page 4 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The present report supplements the main report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to the Human Rights Council. It reflects specific situations alleged to be affecting the independence of the judiciary or violating the right to a fair trial in 63 countries. Further, it presents any replies received from the Government of the country concerned in response to specific allegations together with the Special Rapporteur’s comments and observations. Readers will thus find in it: (a) Summaries of the urgent appeals and allegation letters transmitted by the Special Rapporteur to governmental authorities between 1 January 2006 and 15 January 2007, and of press releases issued during the same reporting period. In this connection, the Special Rapporteur wishes to emphasize that the communications presented in the report exclusively reflect allegations he received and subsequently acted upon. Where information was insufficient and could not be supplemented, or where the information received was outside the mandate, the Special Rapporteur was not in a position to act. Hence such allegations were not included in the report; (b) Summaries of the replies received from several States concerned between 1 January 2006 and 15 January 2007. In certain instances, the Government reply was obtained late and referred to allegations that were presented in the previous report concerning the year 2005 or even earlier. On the other hand, it may be noted that certain responses to urgent appeals or allegation letters sent during the reporting period, and for which the Special Rapporteur wishes to thank the Governments, could not be included in the report owing to the fact that they were either not translated in time or received after 15 January 2007. To the Special Rapporteur’s regret, they will therefore be reflected only in next year’s report. Finally, due to restrictions on the length of the report, the Special Rapporteur has been obliged to summarize the details of all correspondence sent and received. As a result, requests from Governments to publish their replies in their totality could regrettably not be accommodated; (c) Observations or specific comments by the Special Rapporteur. 2. The report also includes six tables of statistical data so as to help the Human Rights Council to have an overview of developments in 2006 and the past three years. 3. As may be seen from the tables, action has mainly been taken in the form of urgent action, and this in conjunction with other special rapporteurs. This reflects not only a personal choice of the Special Rapporteur to work in close collaboration with other special rapporteurs and aimed at strengthening the functioning and impact of the special procedures, but also the fact that it is far from uncommon that situations affecting the judiciary occur in contexts in which other democratic institutions are also at risk, or where a wide range of human rights are being violated such as the right to life, the right not to be subjected to torture and ill-treatment, the right to freedom of expression, as well as the specific rights of women, indigenous peoples or minorities. A/HRC/4/25/Add.1 Page 5 4. The Special Rapporteur notes that communications have been sent to 63 Member States of all regions of the world. Furthermore, he highlights that the type of allegations covers a wide range of subjects. It should be noted, however, that over 40 per cent of the communication sent concern allegations related to threats against lawyers. In addition, about 11 per cent of communications have been sent with respect to alleged violations of the right to choose one’s own lawyer, and similarly, about 11 per cent on reported violations of the freedom of expression of lawyers. A significant percentage (about 10 per cent) concerned alleged violations of the right to have access to the courts and a fair trial. 5. The Special Rapporteur points out that, as compared to 2005, the number of communications sent to Governments has increased by 67 per cent. Given this significant increase, fears are expressed with respect to the increasing percentage of wide-ranging assaults on the independence of judges and lawyers around the world. These facts do not only prove the weakening of the judiciary as an institution, but also reflect direct attacks on judges and lawyers, all of which result in significant violations of the right to due process and to a fair trial. The Special Rapporteur further attributes this increase to the fact that more people are aware of the procedure and the international standards guiding his mandate. However, the significant low percentage of female individuals on behalf of whom the Special Rapporteur was able to receive information and send communications is of serious concern to him. Hence, he is concerned about the lack of reporting on the situation of women and the resulting diminished protection of their human rights. 6. At the same time, the Special Rapporteur wishes to point out that, as compared to previous years, he has enjoyed increased cooperation on the part of Governments. In fact, 34 States of the 63 States referred to in this report have provided him with a substantive reply to his communications. Most of these States have offered detailed substantive information on the allegations received. The Special Rapporteur welcomes and further encourages cooperation from the Governments that have provided replies to his communications. The Special Rapporteur underlines that it is crucial that Governments share their views on the allegations received with him. He highlights his preoccupation in relation to the proportion of specific allegations of serious human rights violations that remain unanswered. The Special Rapporteur invites those States which are lagging behind to avoid situations in which they do not offer any form of substantive reply to allegations transmitted to them. Fearing that such lack of reply may expose these States to various interpretations ranging from administrative negligence to an admission by omission of the allegation relayed to them, he urges them to provide precise and detailed answers at the earliest possible date. 7. The Special Rapporteur trusts that the situation described above demonstrates the relevance of the existence and the concrete impact of this special procedure which, in his view, should definitely be strengthened in the course of the review of mandates by the Human Rights Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integra Calendar
    THe INTEGRA Project is co-funded by the European Union's INTEGRA CALENDAR Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund 2019 01 02 03 04 05 06 1/2 New Year's Day 4 Spring Festival Eve (China) 1 Martisor (Moldova, Romania), Maharishi 1 April Fools 1 Labour Day 1 Children's Day (Moldova, CHina, 4 Youth Day (China) 5 Chinese New Year 4 Independence Day (Senegal) Romania) 7/8 Orthodox Christmas Day Dayanand Saraswati Jayanti (India) 5 Mother's Day (Romania) 5-7 Qing Ming Jie (China) 4 6 Spring Festival Golden Week holiday 6 Memorial Day (Romania), Ramadam Koritè (Senegal) 6 11 Independence Manifesto (Morocco) 1-6 Carnival (Brazil) Chaitra Sukhladi (India) 7 Birthday of Ravindranath (india) 5 Eid al-Fitr, Ramzan Id/Eid-ul-Fitar (China) 9 Day of Valor (philippines), Martyrs' Day 9 Victory Day (Serbia, Moldova, Ukraine), (India) 13 8 Mothers' Day, Longtaitou Festival (China) Guru Govind Singh Jayanti (India) 10 Vasant Panchami (India) (Tunisia) Europe Day (Moldova) 6 Orthodox Ascension (Romania) 10 Monarchy Day (Romania) 14 Revolution and Youth Day (Tunusia) 11 Youth Day 12 Arbor Day (china) 13 Sinhala and Tamil New Year's Eve (Sri 12 Mother's Day (Sri Lanka, Brazil, 7 Dragon Boat Festival (China) Lanka), Special Working Day (Moldova), 14 Valentine's Day Ukraine), Father's Day (Romania) Orthodox New Year 14 Summer Day (Albania) 10 With Monday (Senegal) Rama Navami (India) 13 Special Non-Working Day (Philippines) 15-16 Statehood Day (Serbia) 12 Independence Day (Philippines), 14 Ambedkar Jayanti (India) 15 20 Duruthu Full Moon Poya Day (sri Lanka) 20
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/execorders/execorders.asp 2 2. That those proclamations will be observed on the established dates fo~ all years that I remain in office. Pu~suant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 4.035, this Order shall be effective fifteen (15) days after publication in the State Register and filing with the Secretary of State and shall remain in effect until December 31, 1986. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have set my hand this 19th day of February, 1985. Filed According to Law: a~~~ ~N ANDERSON GROWE Secretary of State il" ."'1" Productivity Month - January-PRODIMPROV January Eye Health Care Month - January-EYECARE January Hobby Month - January-HOBBYMONTH January ~11 MN Foods Week in ~ll MN Schools - Jan 6-12 -MNFOODS first full week in January High Technol?gy Week - Jan 14-18-HIGHTECHPR second week in January MN Youth Health Week - Jan. 13-19-YOUTHHE~L second week in January MN School Nurse Day - Jan. 23 - SHAPE Week - Jan. 20-26 -MNNURSEDAY third week in January Kiwanis Week - January 20-26-KIW~NIS third week in January Children's Heart Fund Week -Jan 27-Feb 2-HEARTWEEK fourth week in January Ukrainian Independence Day - Jan 22-UKRAINDAY January 22 POW/MIA Awareness Day - Jan. 27 - POWMIA January 27 MN Juvenile Officers Day - Jan 31 -MNJUVOFF January 31 Afro-~merican History Month - Feb. AFROAMER February American History Month - Feb. - AMERHIST February Inventor's Month - February-INVENTWEEK
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity
    CI-18/COUNCIL-31/6/REV 2 2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity INTRODUCTION This report is submitted to the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) in line with the Decision on the Safety of Journalists and the issue of Impunity adopted by the Council at its 26th session on 27 March 2008, and renewed at subsequent sessions in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016. In its latest Decision, adopted in November 2016, the IPDC Council urged Member States to “continue to inform the Director-General of UNESCO, on a voluntary basis, on the status of the judicial inquiries conducted on each of the killings condemned by the Director-General”. The present report provides an analysis of the cases of killings of journalists and associated media personnel that were condemned by the Director-General in 2016 and 2017. It also takes stock of the status of judicial enquiries conducted on each of the killings recorded by UNESCO between 2006 and 2017, based on information provided by Member States. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Background and Context 2 3. Journalists’ killings in 2016 and 2017: key findings 7 3.1 Most dangerous regions 8 3.2 Rise in number of women journalists among fatalities 9 3.3 Highest number of killings among TV journalists 11 3.4 Majority of victims are local journalists 11 3.5 Freelance and staff journalists 12 3.6 More killings occurring in countries with no armed conflict 12 4. Member States’ responses: status of the judicial enquiries on cases of journalists killed from 2006 to end 2017 13 4.1 Decrease in Member State response rate to Director-General’s request 18 4.2 Slight reduction in impunity rate, but 89% of cases remain unresolved 19 4.3 Member States reporting on measures to promote safety of journalists and to combat impunity 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Fears Upheaval Over SADC Tribunal
    30 November 2009 Edition 23 HARARE-The Attorney General, Johannes Charges against Bennett arose in 2006 when The MDC says ZANU PF is frustrating efforts to Hitschmann’s house. The laptop is said to have Tomana last week failed to produce the State’s Hitschmann was allegedly found with an arms swear in Bennett as Deputy Agriculture Minister. contained emails that implicated Bennett in State’sstar witness, Michael Hitschmann to testify cache, which the prosecution saysstar he acquired dims terrorism activities. against Deputy Agriculture Minister-Designate after he was given $5 000 by Bennett to topple Tomana’s prosecution seems to be heading for Roy Bennett forcing the defence lawyers to raise President Robert Mugabe. collapse with the State witnesses having so far accusations of deliberate attempts to fumble failed to directly link Bennett to the charges. The State alleges Hitschmann was paid by Bennett the matter. Bennett’s co-accused, Hitschmann was acquitted One of the witnesses admitted that the police to buy weapons to assassinate government of the same charges of terrorism. had not recorded an inventory of arms alleged to officials. Police say Hitschmann implicated On Friday Tomana, informed High Court Judge, Justice Chinembiri Bhunu that the State’s sixth Bennett denies the charges, which his Movement have been recovered from Hitschmann’s house Bennett in the procurement of the arms, but witness was arms dealer Hitschmann – who is for Democratic Change (MDC) party – led by in 2006. Another witness failed to explain why Bennett’s lawyers argue that the arms dealer said to have implicated Bennett in plotting to Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai - says are weapons alleged to have been recovered had increased from nine to 49.
    [Show full text]
  • IALL2017): Law, Language and Justice
    Proceedings of The Fifteenth International Conference on Law and Language of the International Academy of Linguistic Law (IALL2017): Law, Language and Justice May, 16-18, 2017 Hangzhou, China and Montréal, Québec, Canada Chief Editors: Ye Ning, Joseph-G. Turi, and Cheng Le Editors: Lisa Hale, and Jin Zhang Cover Designer: Lu Xi Published by The American Scholars Press, Inc. The Proceedings of The Fifteenth International Conference on Law, Language of the International Academy of Linguistic Law (IALL2017): Law, Language, and Justice is published by the American Scholars Press, Inc., Marietta, Georgia, USA. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. Copyright © 2017 by the American Scholars Press All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-9721479-7-2 Printed in the United States of America 2 Foreword In this sunny and green early summer, you, experts and delegates from different parts of the world, come together beside the Qiantang River in Hangzhou, to participate in The Fifteenth International Conference on Law and Language of the International Academy of Linguistic Law. On the occasion of the opening ceremony, it gives me such great pleasure on behalf of Zhejiang Police College, and also on my own part, to extend a warm welcome to all the distinguished experts and delegates. At the same time, thanks for giving so much trust and support to Zhejiang Police College. Currently, the law-based governance of the country is comprehensively promoted in China. As Xi Jinping, Chinese president, said, “during the entire reform process, we should attach great importance to applying the idea of rule of law and the way of rule of law to play the leading and driving role of rule of law”.
    [Show full text]
  • General Conclusions and Basic Tendencies 1. System of Human Rights Violations
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND BASIC TENDENCIES 1. SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS The year 2003 was marked by deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus. While the general human rights situation in the country did not improve, in its certain spheres it significantly changed for the worse. Disrespect for and regular violations of the basic constitutional civic rights became an unavoidable and permanent factor of the Belarusian reality. In 2003 the Belarusian authorities did not even hide their intention to maximally limit the freedom of speech, freedom of association, religious freedom, and human rights in general. These intentions of the ruling regime were declared publicly. It was a conscious and open choice of the state bodies constituting one of the strategic elements of their policy. This political process became most visible in formation and forced intrusion of state ideology upon the citizens. Even leaving aside the question of the ideology contents, the very existence of an ideology, compulsory for all citizens of the country, imposed through propaganda media and educational establishments, and fraught with punitive sanctions for any deviation from it, is a phenomenon, incompatible with the fundamental human right to have a personal opinion. Thus, the state policy of the ruling government aims to create ideological grounds for consistent undermining of civic freedoms in Belarus. The new ideology is introduced despite the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus which puts a direct ban on that.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the War of 1812 Sources
    Source Guide to the War of 1812 Table of Contents I. Military Journals, Letters and Personal Accounts 2 Service Records 5 Maritime 6 Histories 10 II. Civilian Personal and Family Papers 12 Political Affairs 14 Business Papers 15 Histories 16 III. Other Broadsides 17 Maps 18 Newspapers 18 Periodicals 19 Photos and Illustrations 19 Genealogy 21 Histories of the War of 1812 23 Maryland in the War of 1812 25 This document serves as a guide to the Maryland Center for History and Culture’s library items and archival collections related to the War of 1812. It includes manuscript collections (MS), vertical files (VF), published works, maps, prints, and photographs that may support research on the military, political, civilian, social, and economic dimensions of the war, including the United States’ relations with France and Great Britain in the decade preceding the conflict. The bulk of the manuscript material relates to military operations in the Chesapeake Bay region, Maryland politics, Baltimore- based privateers, and the impact of economic sanctions and the British blockade of the Bay (1813-1814) on Maryland merchants. Many manuscript collections, however, may support research on other theaters of the war and include correspondence between Marylanders and military and political leaders from other regions. Although this inventory includes the most significant manuscript collections and published works related to the War of 1812, it is not comprehensive. Library and archival staff are continually identifying relevant sources in MCHC’s holdings and acquiring new sources that will be added to this inventory. Accordingly, researchers should use this guide as a starting point in their research and a supplement to thorough searches in MCHC’s online library catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Justice for Pavel Sheremet
    July 20, 2017 IN BRIEF One Year Later: Seeking Justice for Pavel Sheremet Concerning Trends for Press Freedom in Ukraine When investigative journalist Pavel Sheremet died in a car explosion in central Kyiv on July 20, 2016, his assassination garnered global media attention. Upon learning the tragic news, then- OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Dunja Mijatović condemned the murder, saying, “This killing and its circumstances must be swiftly and thoroughly investigated, and the 1 perpetrators brought to justice.” However, one year later, virtually no progress has been made on his case. Furthermore, the An internationally acclaimed journalist, Pavel Sheremet received the International escalating harassment and attacks against jour- Press Freedom Award from the Committee nalists in Ukraine, coupled with a culture of im- to Protect Journalists in 1998, and the punity for perpetrators, is worrisome for OSCE’s Prize for Journalism and Democracy Ukraine’s democratic future. To ensure they in recognition of his human rights reporting meet the aspirations of the Ukrainian people, in the Balkans and Afghanistan in 2002. (Photo credit: Okras) authorities in Kiev must reaffirm their com- mitment to freedom of the press by ensuring the perpetrators of Sheremet’s murder—and left Russia—again as a result of mounting hos- similar cases of killing, assault, and harass- tility from the host regime he criticized—and ment—are brought to justice. moved to Kyiv. At the time of his death, Shemeret had lived in Kyiv for five years with Investigative Journalist and Outspoken Critic Ukrainska Pravda editor-in-chief Olena Prytula. A regular contributor to popular news site Ukrainska Pravda, Sheremet was known for In 2000, Sheremet’s cameraman, Dmitry Zavad- challenging the authorities in his home country sky, disappeared in Minsk after shooting a doc- of Belarus as well as in his adopted homes of umentary about the war in Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • As at February 28, 2017) Compiled by György Csiki / ATFS
    NATIONAL INDOOR RECORDS OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (As at February 28, 2017) Compiled by György Csiki / ATFS + = enroute to longer distance; A = high altitude; y = 220y or 440y distance MEN 60 Metres ALB 6.77 Arben Maka Torino 10 Feb 01 AND 7.01 Estéve Martin Escaldes 04 Mar 00 ARM 6.93 Arman Andreasyan Paris 05 Mar 11 AUT* 6.56 Andreas Berger Wien 27 Feb 88 6.56 Andreas Berger Den Haag 18 Feb 89 AZE 6.61 Aleksandr Kornelyuk Göteborg 09 Mar 74 BEL 6.56 Ronald Desruelles Maastricht 10 Feb 85 6.56 Ronald Desruelles Sindelfingen 05 Feb 88 BIH 6.94 Ilija Cvijetic Paris 05 Mar 11 BLR 6.60 Maksim Lynsha Mogilyov 15 Feb 08 BUL 6.58 Petar Petrov Sofia 25 Feb 78 CRO 6.63 Dejan Vojnovic Linz 07 Mar 03 CYP 6.58 Yiannakis Zisimides Pireás 03 Mar 96 CZE 6.58 Frantisek Ptácník Liévin 21 Feb 87 DEN 6.65 Benjamin Hecht Malmö 20 Feb 99 6.65 Kristoffer Hari Skive 19 Feb 17 ESP 6.55 Angel David Rodriguez Düsseldorf 08 Feb 13 6.3 Pedro Pablo Nolet Oviedo 15 Jan 00 EST 6.71 Argo Golberg Tallinn 22 Feb 03 6.4 Enn Lilienthal Moskva 03 Feb 88 FIN 6.58 Markus Pöyhönen Helsinki 04 Mar 03 6.58 Markus Pöyhönen Birmingham 14 Mar 03 FRA 6.45 Ronald Pognon Karlsruhe 13 Feb 05 GBR 6.42 Dwain Chambers Torino 07 Mar 09 GEO 6.71 Besik Gotsiridze Moskva 05 Feb 86 GER 6.52 Julian Reus Leipzig 27 Feb 16 GIB 7.16 Jerai Torres Manchester 29 Jan 17 GRE 6.50 Haris Papadiás Paris 07 Mar 97 HUN 6.54 Gábor Dobos Chemnitz 18 Feb 00 IRL 6.61 Paul Hession Birmingham 03 Mar 07 ISL 6.80 Einar Thór Einarsson Malmö 06 Feb 93 6.5 Bjarni Thór Traustason Reykjavík 15 Mar 97 ISR 6.68 Alex Porkhomovskiy
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 European Championships Statistics – Men's 100M
    2012 European Championships Statistics – Men’s 100m by K Ken Nakamura All time performance list at the European Championships Performance Performer Time Wind Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 9.99 1.3 Francis Obikwelu POR 1 Göteborg 20 06 2 2 10.04 0.3 Darren Campbell GBR 1 Budapest 1998 3 10.06 -0.3 Francis Obikwelu 1 München 2002 3 3 10.06 -1.2 Christophe Lemaitre FRA 1sf1 Barcelona 2010 5 4 10.08 0.7 Linford Christie GBR 1qf1 Helsinki 1994 6 10.09 0.3 Linford Christie 1sf1 Sp lit 1990 7 5 10.10 0.3 Dwain Chambers GBR 2 Budapest 1998 7 5 10.10 1.3 Andrey Yepishin RUS 2 Göteborg 2006 7 10.10 -0.1 Dwain Chambers 1sf2 Barcelona 2010 10 10.11 0.5 Darren Campbell 1sf2 Budapest 1998 10 10.11 -1.0 Christophe Lemaitre 1 Barce lona 2010 12 10.12 0.1 Francis Obikwelu 1sf2 München 2002 12 10.12 1.5 Andrey Yepishin 1sf1 Göteborg 2006 14 10.14 -0.5 Linford Christie 1 Helsinki 1994 14 7 10.14 1.5 Ronald Pognon FRA 2sf1 Göteborg 2006 14 7 10.14 1.3 Matic Osovnikar SLO 3 Gö teborg 2006 17 10.15 -0.1 Linford Christie 1 Stuttgart 1986 17 10.15 0.3 Dwain Chambers 1sf1 Budapest 1998 17 10.15 -0.3 Darren Campbell 2 München 2002 20 9 10.16 1.5 Steffen Bringmann GDR 1sf1 Stuttgart 1986 20 10.16 1.3 Ronald Pognon 4 Göteb org 2006 20 9 10.16 1.3 Mark Lewis -Francis GBR 5 Göteborg 2006 20 9 10.16 -0.1 Jaysuma Saidy Ndure NOR 2sf2 Barcelona 2010 24 12 10.17 0.3 Haralabos Papadias GRE 3 Budapest 1998 24 12 10.17 -1.2 Emanuele Di Gregorio IA 2sf1 Barcelona 2010 26 14 10.18 1.5 Bruno Marie -Rose FRA 2sf1 Stuttgart 1986 26 10.18 -1.0 Mark Lewis Francis 2 Barcelona 2010
    [Show full text]
  • National Patriotic Instructor Handbook
    Handbook of Instruction for the National Patriotic Instructor Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War ―To perpetuate the memory of the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) and the men who saved the Union in 1861 to 1865‖ Introduction The American Heritage ®Dictionary defines ―patriotism‖ as feeling, expressing, or inspired by love for one’s country; the dictionary also defines ―instructor‖ as one who instructs; a teacher. In the Ritual of the SUVCW, the color of the Patriotic Instructors station is red – denoting Patriotism, Strength, and Courage. Fulfillment of the duties of the Patriotic Instructor requires dedication to the cause. This handbook is not the definitive answer to every question but created to serve as a ―help‖ in the duties of the National Patriotic Instructor. As in all things, effort must be applied for its success. The content of this handbook should not be read as another demand on your time, but a guide to what can be done as a Patriotic Instructor of the Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War. This handbook was created and edited by Bruce B. Butgereit, PDC; National Patriotic Instructor Sources include: Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War Ritual, National SUVCW website and other history-related sites Property of and copyright by Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War ©2005. Revised 2009. Chapters 1. The National Patriotic Instructor A. The Job Description B. Activities on a National level Communication via The Banner Communication via email ―For the Good of the Order‖ C. Reporting to the National Encampment 2. The Committee on Americanization and Education A.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents City Union of Baltimore Fy 2004-2005
    TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY UNION OF BALTIMORE FY 2004-2005 * * * * ARTICLE 1: DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLE, POLICIES AND PURPOSE ___________2 ARTICLE 2: RECOGNITION___________________________________________________2 ARTICLE 3: CHECKOFF______________________________________________________2 ARTICLE 4: MEMBERSHIP DUES DEDUCTION PRINT-OUT______________________3 ARTICLE 5: UNION SECURITY ________________________________________________3 ARTICLE 6: DISCRIMINATION________________________________________________4 ARTICLE 7: MANAGEMENT RIGHTS __________________________________________4 ARTICLE 8: GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE______________________4 ARTICLE 9: DISCIPLINE AND DISCHARGE ____________________________________7 ARTICLE 10: PROBATIONARY PERIOD ________________________________________8 ARTICLE 11: RATES OF PAY __________________________________________________8 ARTICLE 12: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES _________________________11 ARTICLE 13: PENSION AND RELATED BENEFITS _____________________________11 ARTICLE 14: HEALTH AND WELFARE________________________________________12 ARTICLE 15: JOINT LABOR-MANAGEMENT CHILD CARE COMMITTEE _________13 ARTICLE 16: DEATH AND ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT AND CATASTROPHIC ILLNESS BENEFITS _________________________________________14 ARTICLE 17: HOURS OF WORK ______________________________________________15 ARTICLE 18: OVERTIME ____________________________________________________17 ARTICLE 19: FLEXTIME ____________________________________________________18 ARTICLE 20: VACATION LEAVE______________________________________________18
    [Show full text]