APPENDIX G Greenhouse Gases Analysis

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project City of Oceanside, California

Prepared for:

City of Oceanside 300 North Coast Highway Oceanside, California 92057

Prepared by:

605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024

MARCH 2020

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. SUMMARY ...... III 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Report Purpose ...... 1 1.2 Project Location ...... 1 1.3 Project Description...... 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...... 11 2.1 The Greenhouse Effect ...... 11 2.2 Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potential ...... 11 3 REGULATORY SETTING ...... 15 3.1 Federal Activities ...... 15 3.2 State of California ...... 16 3.3 Local ...... 29 3.3.1 City of Oceanside ...... 29 3.3.2 City of Carlsbad ...... 33 4 CLIMATE CHANGE CONDITIONS AND INVENTORIES ...... 40 4.1 Contributions to Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 40 4.2 Potential Effects of Human Activity on Climate Change ...... 41 4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ...... 43 4.1 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Guidance ...... 43 4.2 Cumulative Nature of Climate Change ...... 43 4.3 CEQA Guidelines ...... 44 5 IMPACT ANALYSIS ...... 46 5.1 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 48 Construction ...... 48 Operational ...... 53 Summary of GHG Emissions...... 57 5.2 Conflict with an Applicable Plan ...... 60 6 REFERENCES ...... 70

APPENDIX A Construction Schedule;CalEEModVersion 2016.3.2 and SMAQMD Road Construction Emission Model Version 9.0.0 Modeling and Estimated Emissions

6556 i September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. FIGURES 1 Regional Map ...... 5 2 Vicinity Map ...... 7 3 Conceptual Site Plan ...... 9 TABLES Table 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources in California ...... 40 Table 2 City of Oceanside Baseline Community-Wide GHG Emissions Inventory (2005) ...... 41 Table 3 2024 Interpolated Efficiency Metric ...... 45 Table 4 Construction Scenario Assumptions ...... 50 Table 5 Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 52 Table 6 State Measures and Project Design Features Addressing Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 53 Table 7 Estimated Annual Operational Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 57 Table 8 Project Consistency with the City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan ...... 60 Table 9 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies ...... 64

6556 ii September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

SUMMARY

The proposed project (project) location lies within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Oceanside (approximately 9.8 acres) and the City of Carlsbad (approximately 2.7 acres) in northern San Diego County (Figures 1 and 2). The project includes development of three hotel buildings totaling 426 rooms, a parking structure, and a bridge crossing Buena Vista Creek on approximately 12.5 acres of currently vacant land.

This greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impact analysis evaluates the potential for construction and operation of the project to result in significant adverse impacts related to GHG emissions. Construction of the project would result in GHG emissions primarily associated with use of off- road construction equipment, on-road hauling and vendor (material delivery) trucks, and worker vehicles. Construction GHG emissions associated with development of the hotel, parking structure, and ancillary uses was estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 20132016.23.2. GHG emissions from construction of the proposed bridge were estimated using the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Road Construction Emission Model, Version 89.10.0 (SMAQMD 20162018). Operation of the project would result in GHG emissions from vehicular traffic, area sources, energy sources, water supply and wastewater generation, and solid waste. Project-generated operational emissions were also estimated using CalEEMod.

The City of Oceanside has established interim thresholds for projects exceeding the state- prescribed 900 MT “bright line” threshold of significance be assessed utilizing the efficiency/service population methodology, which is the basis for the emissions reduction targets established in the City’s draft CAP. For projects buildout after 2020, such as the project, the efficiency threshold is 3.0 MT CO2E per capita.

Construction of the project is estimated to generate approximately 2,9662,982 MT CO2E over three years of construction. Project-generated construction GHG emissions annualized over a 20- year period per County of San Diego guidance would be approximately 148 149 MT CO2E per year. Project-generated operational GHG emissions, assuming incorporation of statewide measures and project-design features that reduce GHG emissions, plus amortized construction emissions, was estimated to be 5,5545,059 MT CO2E per year.

The project would accommodate an average of 395 guests, employ 152 full time jobs, and provide 68 part time/seasonal employees, resulting in a service population of 615 employees and guests. As such, project GHG emissions would be 9.038.2 per capita, and exceed the 3.0 MT CO2E threshold. The project would comply with State and City regulatory measures including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, state

6556 iii September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project regulatory measures that would reduce indoor and outdoor water consumption by 20% and outdoor water consumption by 25%, and the statewide goal of 75% diversion for waste generated. In addition, the project would incorporate sustainable features such as installing low- flow water fixtures, water efficient irrigation systems, and would provide guests with an electric shuttle service to attractions within the project area. As the project would result in an exceedance of the 3.0 MT CO2E, mitigation measure MM-GHG-1 is required to further reduce the project’s GHG emissions. However, even with implementation of MM-GHG-1, GHG emissions associated with development of the project would be cumulatively considerable and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

At this time, the City of Oceanside has not adopted a GHG reduction plan, which would be applicable to the project. However, iIt was determined that the project would not conflict with the City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan and General Plan, Assembly Bill 32 Scoping Plan, and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Therefore, no conflict would occur.

6556 iv September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Report Purpose

The purpose of this report is to estimate and evaluate the potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project (project) relative to the thresholds established in the County of San Diego’s screening thresholds for GHGs. The report includes a quantitative analysis of project-related GHG emissions resulting from construction and operation of the project.

1.2 Project Location

The project would be located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Oceanside (approximately 9.8 acres) and the City of Carlsbad (approximately 2.7 acres) in northern San Diego County (Figures 1 and 2). The project site is situated directly south of State Route 78 (SR-78), east of Jefferson Street and the Buena Vista Lagoon, and north of Buena Vista Creek and the Plaza Camino Real shopping center. The site is currently undeveloped.

1.3 Project Description

The commercial project would develop three hotel buildings, a parking structure, and a bridge on approximately 12.5 acres of vacant land (Figure 3).

Hotel Buildings

The project proposes to construct three separate hotel buildings for a total of 426 hotel rooms. Hotel Building 1 will be located on the west portion of the project site and will consist of a six- story, 75-foot, and approximately 167,160-square-foot building with 179 rooms. A restaurant of approximately 3,500 square feet will be located on the ground level of this hotel building. Other amenities associated with Hotel Building 1 include office/internet facilities, meeting rooms, conference rooms, banquet rooms, fitness room, and an attached pavilion. Guest hotel rooms will be located on the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth floors. The outdoor amenities associated with Hotel Building 1 will be shared with Hotel Building 2 and include a pool, spa, fireplace, barbecue, chaise lounge chairs, tables and chairs, movie screen and fire pit.

Hotel Building 2 will be located in the center portion of the project site, just north of Buena Vista Creek and will consist of a five-story, 67.5-foot-tall, and approximately 73,285-square-foot building with 135 rooms. In addition to the shared pool deck area, Hotel Building 2’s amenities will also include fitness and dining facilities.

6556 1 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Hotel Building 3 will be located at the northeast corner of the project site and will consist of a four-story, 60-foot-tall, and approximately 82,570-square-foot building with 112 hotel rooms. Amenities associated with this building include breakfast/dining, fitness, and meeting facilities, along with an outdoor pool, spa, fireplace, barbecue, lounge chairs, tables and chairs, fire pit, and sport court areas for active recreation opportunities.

Pavilion

The pavilion building will consist of a one-story, 40-foot-tall, approximately 4,000-square-foot structure. The purpose of the pavilion building is to hold meetings and banquets. The pavilion building will be located to the west of Hotel Building 1 and southeast of a surface parking lot. The pavilion will include a Native American theme by providing artwork and artifacts within the interior design and public education lectures for the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians will be held there.

In addition, the pavilion will host a hospitality program providing speakers, mentors, and hotel tours. The hospitality program will coordinate with local colleges to provide internships in orientation to careers in the hospitality field, spending time in of the hotel departments, assist with career goal setting, interviewing skills and professional development, and providing constructive feedback to the interns.

Bridge

For the primary access to the project site, a three-lane bridge is proposed, consisting of one inbound lane, two outbound lanes, and a sidewalk on the western side. The proposed bridge will be located at the southeastern corner of the project site and will connect the project site with the Plaza Camino Real perimeter road (Ring Road), which extends south to Monroe Street.

Parking

The project will incorporate structure and surface parking to provide a total of 479 regular and handicapped parking spaces to serve the hotel, restaurant, and pavilion buildings. The four-story parking structure will be located along the project’s northerly boundary (along the State Route 78 (SR-78) freeway frontage) in the center of the project site, north of Hotel Building 2. The parking structure will be 43 feet tall and will provide 432 parking spaces. Surface parking will be located throughout the project site and will provide 47 parking spaces. The hotel buildings, restaurant, and pavilion will use the parking structure and adjacent surface parking.

6556 2 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Sustainable Design Features

The project has incorporated the following sustainability features into the project design to reduce its overall emissions:

• Pedestrian facilities and accessibility to nearby neighborhood and regional amenities, including, but not limited to, the Plaza Camino Real Transit Center, Plaza Camino Real shopping mall, restaurants, drug store, banks, and multiple fitness centers. • Bicycle facilities, including a bike path constructed as part of the proposed bridge spanning Buena Vista Creek.

• Install water efficient fixtures such as low-flow toilets and showerheads.

• Use of water efficient irrigation systems.

6556 3 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 4 September 2016March 2020 g La Mirada Valley March Fullerton Placentia Yorba Linda 91 Woodcrest AFB s Buena 90 Riverside CountyCorona Park Anaheim Orange County ress 55 39 243 57 Orange Nuevo s Garden Perris San 22 Grove Tustin 241 Jacinto Foothills Santa Idyllwild- Westminster East Ana Pine Cove Hemet Fountain Tustin Sun Hemet Huntington 133 Valley City Winchester Beach 405 El Toro Costa Irvine Station Lake 215 Mesa El Rancho Elsinore 1 Toro Santa Margarita 74 Newport Laguna Mission Beach 73 Hills Coto De Wildomar Viejo Aliso Caza Viejo Trabuco Laguna Highlands Beach Laguna Niguel San Juan 371 Capistrano Temecula Dana Orange Point San County Clemente San Diego Riverside Co County 79 Rainbow San Diego C

Fallbrook 5 15 76 Camp Pendleton North Bonsall

Camp Pendleton Hidden South Valley Oceanside Meadows Vista Center

San Marcos Escondido Project Site Carlsbad 78

Encinitas Ramona San Diego Country Poway Estates Pacific 56 67 Ocean San Diego Santee Lakeside 52 Alpine 8 Harbison Canyon 805 El Cajon La Casa de Mesa Oro-Mount Helix 163 Rancho San Lemon Spring Diego Grove 209 Valley Jamul Coronado282 National Bonita 94 City Chula 75 Vista

Imperial Beach 5 MEXICO 01510 5 Miles

FIGURE 1 Regional Map

GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE INNS AT BUENA VISTA CREEK Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 6 September 2016March 2020 78

Project Site

5

0 1,000 2,000 Feet

SOURCE: USGS 7.5 Minute Series San Luis Rey Quadrangle. FIGURE 2 Vicinity Map 6556 GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE INNS AT BUENA VISTA CREEK Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 8 September 2016March 2020 P1 H3

H1 H2

Project Boundary California Coastal Zone Boundary

H1 - Hotel Building 1 H2 - Hotel Building 2 H3 - Hotel Building 3 0 50 100 P1 - Parking Structure 1 Feet

SOURCE: Hunsaker & Associates 2016 FIGURE 3 Conceptual Site Plan

GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE INNS AT BUENA VISTA CREEK Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 10 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 The Greenhouse Effect

Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate, such as temperature, precipitation, or wind, lasting for an extended period (decades or longer). Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often called “greenhouse gases”. The greenhouse effect traps heat in the troposphere through a threefold process as follows: Short-wave radiation emitted by the Sun is absorbed by the Earth; the Earth emits a portion of this energy in the form of long-wave radiation; and GHGs in the upper atmosphere absorb this long-wave radiation and emit it into space and toward the Earth. This “trapping” of the long-wave (thermal) radiation emitted back toward the Earth is the underlying process of the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect is a natural process that contributes to regulating the earth’s temperature. Without it, the temperature of the Earth would be about 0°F (−18°C) instead of its present 57°F (14°C). Global climate change concerns are focused on whether human activities are leading to an enhancement of the greenhouse effect (National Climatic Data Center 2015).

2.2 Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potential

Principal GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), and water vapor (H2O). Some GHGs, such as CO2, CH4, and N2O, occur naturally and are emitted to the atmosphere through natural processes and human activities. Of these gases, CO2 and CH4 are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. Emissions of CO2 are largely byproducts of fossil fuel combustion, whereas CH4 results mostly from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Man-made GHGs, which have a much greater heat-absorption potential than CO2, include fluorinated gases, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), which are associated with certain industrial products and processes (Climate Action Team [CAT] 2006). A summary of the most common GHGs and their sources is included below.1

Carbon Dioxide

CO2 is a naturally occurring gas and a by-product of human activities, and is the principal anthropogenic GHG that affects the Earth's radiative balance. Natural sources of CO2 include respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus, evaporation from oceans, volcanic out gassing, and decomposition of dead organic matter. Human activities that generate CO2 are from the combustion of coal, oil, natural gas, and wood.

1 The descriptions of GHGs are summarized from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Second Assessment Report, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (2015).

6556 11 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Methane

CH4 is a flammable gas and is the main component of natural gas. Methane is produced through anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of waste in landfills, flooded rice fields, animal digestion, decomposition of animal wastes, production and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, coal production, and incomplete fossil fuel combustion.

Nitrous Oxide

Sources of N2O include soil cultivation practices (microbial processes in soil and water), especially the use of commercial and organic fertilizers, manure management, industrial processes (such as in nitric acid production, nylon production, and fossil fuel-fired power plants), vehicle emissions, and the use of N2O as a propellant (such as in rockets, racecars, aerosol sprays).

Fluorinated Gases

Fluorinated gases are synthetic, powerful GHGs that are emitted from a variety of industrial processes. Several prevalent fluorinated gases include:

• Hydrofluorocarbons: HFCs are compounds containing only hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon atoms. HFCs are synthetic chemicals that are used as alternatives to ozone depleting substances in serving many industrial, commercial, and personal needs. HFCs are emitted as by-products of industrial processes and are also used in manufacturing.

• Perfluorocarbons: PFCs are a group of human-made chemicals composed of carbon and fluorine only. These chemicals were introduced as alternatives, along with HFCs, to the ozone depleting substances. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. Since PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere, these chemicals have long lifetimes, ranging between 10,000 and 50,000 years.

• Sulfur Hexafluoride: SF6 is a colorless gas soluble in alcohol and ether, slightly soluble in water. SF6 is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in semiconductor manufacturing, the magnesium industry, and as a tracer gas for leak detection.

• Nitrogen trifluoride: NF3 is used in the manufacture of a variety of electronics, including semiconductors and flat panel displays.

6556 12 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Gases in the atmosphere can contribute to climate change both directly and indirectly. Direct effects occur when the gas itself absorbs radiation. Indirect radiative forcing occurs when chemical transformations of the substance produce other GHGs, when a gas influences the atmospheric lifetimes of other gases, and/or when a gas affects atmospheric processes that alter the radiative balance of the earth (e.g., affect cloud formation or albedo) (EPA 2016). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) developed the Global Warming Potential (GWP) concept to compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The GWP of a GHG is defined as the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing from the instantaneous release of 1 kilogram of a trace substance relative to that of 1 kilogram of a reference gas (IPCC 2014). The reference gas used is CO2; therefore, GWP-weighted emissions are measured in metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MT CO2E).

CalEEMod assumes that the GWP for CH4 is 21 (which means that emissions of 1 MT of CH4 are equivalent to emissions of 21 MT of CO2), and the GWP for N2O is 310, based on the IPCC Second Assessment Report. The IPCC has released subsequent Assessment Reports with updated GWPs, and statewide documents are beginning to transition to the use of the GWPs in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. GWP used in EPA’s 2016 Inventory of U.S Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks and CARB’s California 2016 GHG emissions inventory are based on the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which includes 1 for CO2, 25 for CH4, and 298 for N2O. Nonetheless, the use of the different GWPs would not substantially change the overall project-generated GHG emissions, which are primarily CO2. As such, for the purposes of this analysis, it is appropriate to use the hardwired GWP values in CalEEMod from the IPCC Second Assessment Report.

6556 13 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 14 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

3 REGULATORY SETTING 3.1 Federal Activities Massachusetts vs. EPA. In Massachusetts v. EPA (April 2007), the Supreme Court directed the EPA Administrator to determine whether GHG emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision. In making these decisions, the EPA Administrator is required to follow the language of Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). On December 7, 2009, the Administrator signed a final rule with two distinct findings regarding GHGs under Section 202(a) of the CAA:

• The Administrator found that elevated concentrations of GHGs—CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6—in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. This is referred to as the “endangerment finding.”

• The Administrator further found the combined emissions of GHGs—CO2, CH4, N2O, and HFCs—from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG air pollution that endangers public health and welfare. This is referred to as the “cause or contribute finding.”

These two findings were necessary to establish the foundation for regulation of GHGs from new motor vehicles as air pollutants under the CAA.

Energy Independence and Security Act. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (December 2007), among other key measures, would do the following, which would aid in the reduction of national GHG emissions:

1. Increase the supply of alternative fuel sources by setting a mandatory Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022 2. Set a target of 35 miles per gallon (mpg) for the combined fleet of cars and light trucks by model year 2020 and directs National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to establish a fuel economy program for medium- and heavy-duty trucks and create a separate fuel economy standard for work trucks 3. Prescribe or revise standards affecting regional efficiency for heating and cooling products and procedures for new or amended standards, energy conservation, energy efficiency labeling for consumer electronic products, residential boiler efficiency, electric motor efficiency, and home appliances.

EPA and NHTSA Joint Final Rules for Vehicle Standards. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and NHTSA announced a joint final rule to establish a national program consisting of new standards for light-duty vehicles model years 2012 through 2016 (April 2010) that is intended to reduce 6556 15 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

GHG emissions and improve fuel economy. The EPA approved the first-ever national GHG emissions standards under the Clean Air Act, and NHTSA approved Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (75 FR 25324– 25728), which became effective on July 6, 2010 (75 FR 25324–25728). The EPA’s GHG standards require new passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile in model year 2016. The CAFE standards for passenger cars and light trucks will be phased in between 2012 and 2016.The rules will simultaneously reduce GHG emissions, improve energy security, increase fuel savings, and provide clarity and predictability for manufacturers (EPA 2013). In August 2012, the EPA and NHTSA approved a second round of GHG and CAFE standards for model years 2017 and beyond (77 FR 62624–63200). These standards will reduce motor vehicle GHG emissions for cars and light-duty trucks by model year 2025.

Clean Power Plan and New Source Performance Standards for Electric Generating Units. On October 23, 2015, EPA published a final rule (effective December 22, 2015) establishing Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units (80 FR 64510–64660), also known as the Clean Power Plan. These guidelines prescribe how states must develop plans to reduce GHG emissions from existing fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units. The guidelines establish CO2 emission performance rates representing the best system of emission reduction for two subcategories of existing fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units: (1) fossil-fuel-fired electric utility steam-generating units and (2) stationary combustion turbines. Concurrently, EPA published a final rule (effective October 23, 2015) establishing Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units (80 FR 64661–65120). The rule prescribes CO2 emission standards for newly constructed, modified, and reconstructed affected fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units. Implementation of the Clean Power Plan has been stayed by the US Supreme Court pending resolution of several lawsuits.

3.2 State of California

Title 24. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations was established in 1978, and serves to enhance and regulate California’s building standards. While not initially promulgated to reduce GHG emissions, Part 6 of Title 24 specifically establishes Building Energy Efficiency Standards that are designed to ensure new and existing buildings in the State of California achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality. The California Energy Commission is required by law to adopt standards every three years that are cost effective for homeowners over the 30-year lifespan of a building. These standards are updated to consider and incorporate new energy efficient technologies and construction methods. As a result, these

6556 16 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

standards save energy, increase electricity supply reliability, increase indoor comfort, avoid the need to construct new power plants and help preserve the environment.

The current Title 24 standards are the 2013 standards, which became effective on July 1, 2014. Buildings constructed in accordance with the 2013 standards will use 25% less energy for lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, and water heating than the 2008 standards (CEC 2012). The previous Title 24 standards were the 2016 Title 24 building energy efficiency standards, which will be effective January 1, 2017, will further reduce energy used and associated GHG emissions. In general, single family homes built to the 2016 standards are anticipated to use about 28% less energy for lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, and water heating than those built to the 2013 standards, and non-residential buildings built to the 2016 standards will use an estimated 5% less energy than those built to the 2013 standards (CEC 2016). The 2019 Title 24 building energy standards became effective January 1, 2020.Although the project would be required to comply with 2016 2019 Title 24 standards as it is anticipated to be constructed during or after 20172020, this analysis conservatively does not quantify the increase energy efficiency associated with the more stringent 2016 2019 Title 24 standards.

Title 24 also includes Part 11, known as California’s Green Building Standards (CALGreen). The CALGreen standards took effect in January 2011, and instituted mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up, new construction of commercial, low- rise residential and state-owned buildings, as well as schools and hospitals. The mandatory standards require:

• 20% mandatory reduction in indoor water use. • 50% of construction and demolition waste must be diverted from landfills. • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency. • Low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials, such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring and particle boards.

The CALGreen standards also include voluntary efficiency measures that are provided at two separate tiers and implemented at the discretion of local agencies and applicants. CALGreen’s Tier 1 standards call for a 15% improvement in energy requirements; stricter water conservation; 65% diversion of construction and demolition waste; 10% recycled content in building materials; 20% permeable paving; 20% cement reduction; and cool/solar-reflective roofs. CALGreen’s more rigorous Tier 2 standards call for a 30% improvement in energy requirements; stricter water conservation; 75% diversion of construction and demolition waste; 15% recycled content in building materials; 30% permeable paving; 30% cement reduction; and cool/solar-reflective roofs.

6556 17 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

The California Building Standards Commission approved amendments to the voluntary measures of the CALGreen standards in December 2018. The 2019 CALGreen standards became effective January 1, 2020. As with the 2019 Title 24 standards, the 2019 CALGreen standards focus on building energy efficiency.

Assembly Bill (AB) 939 and Assembly Bill 341. In 1989, AB 939, known as the Integrated Waste Management Act (Public Resources Code Sections 40000 et seq.), was passed because of the increase in waste stream and the decrease in landfill capacity. The statute established the California Integrated Waste Management Board, which oversees a disposal reporting system. AB 939 mandated a reduction of waste being disposed where jurisdictions were required to meet diversion goals of all solid waste through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities of 25% by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. AB 341 (Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011 (Chesbro)) amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75% of solid waste generated be source-reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020, and annually thereafter. In addition, AB 341 required the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop strategies to achieve the state’s policy goal. CalRecycle conducted several stakeholder workshops and in May 2012 published a discussion document titled California's New Goal: 75 Percent Recycling, which identifies concepts that CalRecycle believes would assist the state in reaching the 75% goal by 2020.

Assembly Bill 1493. In a response to the transportation sector accounting for more than half of California’s CO2 emissions, AB 1493 (Pavley) was enacted in July 2002. AB 1493 required CARB to set GHG emission standards for passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks, and other vehicles determined by the state board to be vehicles whose primary use is noncommercial personal transportation in the state. The bill required that CARB set GHG emission standards for motor vehicles manufactured in 2009 and all subsequent model years. CARB adopted the standards in September 2004. When fully phased in, the near-term (2009–2012) standards will result in a reduction of about 22% in GHG emissions compared to the emissions from the 2002 fleet, while the mid-term (2013–2016) standards will result in a reduction of about 30%.

Senate Bill (SB) 1078. SB 1078 (Sher) (September 2002) established the RPS program, which requires an annual increase in renewable generation by the utilities equivalent to at least 1% of sales, with an aggregate goal of 20% by 2017. This goal was subsequently accelerated, requiring utilities to obtain 20% of their power from renewable sources by 2010 (see SB 107 and EOs S- 14-08 and S-21-09.)

Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. EO S-3-05 (June 2005) established the following goals: GHG emissions should be reduced to 2000 levels by 2010, GHG emissions should be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020, and GHG emissions should be reduced to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.

6556 18 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Under EO S-3-05, the California Environmental Protection Agency is directed to report biannually on progress made toward meeting the GHG targets and the impacts to California due to global warming, including impacts to water supply, public health, agriculture, the coastline, and forestry. The Climate Action Team (CAT) was formed, which subsequently issued the 2006 Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature (CAT 2006).

The 2009 Climate Action Team Biennial Report (CAT 2010b) expands on the policy outlined in the 2006 assessment. The 2009 report identifies the need for additional research in several different aspects that affect climate change in order to support effective climate change strategies. Subsequently, the 2010 Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature (CAT 2010a) reviews past climate action milestones including voluntary reporting programs, GHG standards for passenger vehicles, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a statewide renewable energy standard, and the cap-and-trade program.

Assembly Bill 32. In furtherance of the goals established in EO S-3-05, the legislature enacted AB 32 (Núñez and Pavley), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (September 27, 2006). AB 32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 representing a reduction of approximately 15% below emissions expected under a “business-as- usual” scenario.

AB 32 directs CARB to develop programs and requirements necessary to achieve the AB 32 goals, to adopt regulations requiring the reporting and verification of statewide GHG emissions, and to monitor compliance and enforcing any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emission reduction measure, or market-based compliance mechanism adopted. AB 32 also directs Climate Action Team to coordinate the efforts set forth under EO S-3-05 to continue its role in coordinating overall climate policy. Pursuant to AB 32, CARB must adopt regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. Reductions in GHG emissions will come from virtually all sectors of the economy and will be accomplished from a combination of policies, planning, direct regulations, market approaches, incentives and voluntary efforts. These efforts target GHG emission reductions from cars and trucks, electricity production, fuels, and other sources. The full implementation of AB 32 will help mitigate risks associated with climate change, while improving energy efficiency, expanding the use of renewable energy resources, cleaner transportation, and reducing waste.

As required under AB 32, on December 6, 2007, CARB approved the 1990 GHG emissions inventory, thereby establishing the emissions limit for 2020. The 2020 emissions limit was set at 427 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2E. In addition to the 1990 emissions inventory, CARB also adopted regulations requiring mandatory reporting of GHGs for the large facilities that account for 94% of GHG emissions from industrial and commercial stationary sources in California. AB 32 requires CARB to develop a Scoping Plan, which lays out California’s

6556 19 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

strategy for meeting the goals and which must be updated every five years. On December 11, 2008, CARB approved the initial Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (Scoping Plan) (CARB 2008) to achieve the goals of AB 32. The Scoping Plan establishes an overall framework for a suite of measures that will be adopted to sharply reduce California’s GHG emissions. The Scoping Plan evaluates opportunities for sector-specific reductions, integrates all CARB and CAT early actions and additional GHG reduction measures by both entities, identifies additional measures to be pursued as regulations, and outlines the role of a cap-and-trade program. The key elements of the Scoping Plan include the following:

• Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards • Achieving a statewide renewable energy mix of 33% • Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system and caps sources contributing 85% of California’s GHG emissions • Establishing targets for transportation-related GHG emissions for regions throughout California, and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets • Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing state laws and policies, including California’s clean car standards, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard • Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high GWP gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State of California’s long-term commitment to AB 32 implementation

In May 2014, CARB approved the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan Update), which builds upon the initial Scoping Plan with new strategies and recommendations and identifies opportunities to leverage existing and new funds to further drive GHG emission reductions through strategic planning and targeted low carbon investments. Based on updated information, the Scoping Plan Update revises the 2020 emissions target to 431 MMT CO2E (based on updated GWPs for GHGs) (CARB 2014c).

In 2015, as directed by EO B-30-15, CARB began working on an update to the Scoping Plan to incorporate the 2030 target of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 as set forth in S-3-05. The Governor called on California to pursue a new and ambitious set of strategies, in line with the five climate change pillars from his inaugural address, to reduce GHG emissions and prepare for the unavoidable impacts of climate change. In the

6556 20 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project summer of 2016, the Legislature affirmed the importance of addressing climate change through passage of SB 32 (Pavley, Chapter 249, Statutes of 2016).

In December 2017, CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (2030 Scoping Plan) (CARB 2017). The 2030 Scoping Plan builds on the successful framework established in the initial Scoping Plan and First Update, while identifying new, technologically feasible, and cost-effective strategies that will serve as the framework to achieve the 2030 GHG target and define the state’s climate change priorities to 2030 and beyond. The strategies’ “known commitments” include implementing renewable energy and energy efficiency (including the mandates of SB 350), increased stringency of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, measures identified in the Mobile Source and Freight Strategies, measures identified in the proposed Short- Lived Climate Pollutant Plan, and increased stringency of SB 375 targets. To fill the gap in additional reductions needed to achieve the 2030 target, it recommends continuing the Cap-and- Trade Program and a measure to reduce GHGs from refineries by 20%.

For local governments, the 2030 Scoping Plan replaced the initial Scoping Plan’s 15% reduction goal with a recommendation to aim for a community-wide goal of no more than 6 MT CO2E per capita by 2030 and no more than 2 MT CO2E per capita by 2050, which are consistent with the state’s long-term goals. These goals are also consistent with the Global Climate Leadership Memorandum of Understanding (Under 2 MOU) and the Paris Agreement, which are developed around the scientifically based levels necessary to limit global warming below two degrees Celsius. The 2030 Scoping Plan recognized the benefits of local government GHG planning (e.g., through climate action plans (CAPs)) and provide more information regarding tools CARB is working on to support those efforts. It also recognizes the CEQA streamlining provisions for project level review where there is a legally adequate CAP.2

The 2030 Scoping Plan recommends strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32, SB 32, and EO S-3-05, and establishes an overall framework for the measures that will be adopted to reduce California’s GHG emissions. A project is considered consistent with the statutes and EOs if it meets the general policies in reducing GHG emissions in order to facilitate the achievement of the state’s goals and does not impede attainment of those goals. As discussed in several cases, a given project need not be in perfect conformity with every planning policy or goal to be consistent. Rather, a project would be consistent if it furthers the objectives and does not obstruct their attainment.

2 Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490; San Francisco Tomorrow et al. v. City and County of San Francisco (2015) 229 Cal.App.4th 498; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Specific Plan v. City & County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. V. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 719.

6556 21 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

The Scoping Plan Update highlights California’s progress toward meeting the near-term 2020 GHG emission reduction goals defined in the initial Scoping Plan, summaries the latest climate change science, defines CARB’s climate change priorities for the next 5 years, and provides direction on how to achieve long-term emission reduction goal described in EO S-3-05 and B- 16-12 (see EO B-16-12). The Scoping Plan Update identified nine key focus areas, including energy, transportation, agriculture, water, waste management, and natural and working lands, along with short-lived climate pollutants, green buildings, and the cap-and-trade program. The update also recommends that a statewide mid-term target and mid-term and long-term sector targets be established toward meeting the 2050 goal established by EO S-3-05 (i.e., reduce California’s GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels) although no specific recommendations are made.

Senate Bill 107. SB 107 (Simitian) (September 2006) requires investor-owned utilities such as Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), to generate 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010. Previously, state law required that this target be achieved by 2017 (see SB 1078).

Senate Bill 1368. SB 1368 (September 2006) requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop and adopt regulations for GHG emissions performance standards for the long-term procurement of electricity by local publicly owned utilities. These standards must be consistent with the standards adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). This effort will help protect energy customers from financial risks associated with investments in carbon- intensive generation by allowing new capital investments in power plants whose GHG emissions are as low or lower than new combined-cycle natural gas plants, by requiring imported electricity to meet GHG performance standards in California, and by requiring that the standards be developed and adopted in a public process.

Executive Order S-1-07. EO S-1-07 (January 2007) sets a declining Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for GHG emissions measured in CO2E gram per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The target of the LCFS is to reduce the carbon intensity of California passenger vehicle fuels by at least 10% by 2020. The carbon intensity measures the amount of GHG emissions in the lifecycle of a fuel, including extraction/feedstock production, processing, transportation, and final consumption, per unit of energy delivered. CARB adopted the implementing regulation in April 2009. The regulation is expected to increase the production of biofuels, including those from alternative sources such as algae, wood, and agricultural waste. In addition, the LCFS would drive the availability of plug-in hybrid, battery electric, and fuel-cell power motor vehicles. The LCFS is anticipated to replace 20% of the fuel used in motor vehicles with alternative fuels by 2020.

6556 22 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Senate Bill 97. SB 97 (Dutton) (August 2007) directs the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop guidelines under CEQA for the mitigation of GHG emissions. OPR was tasked to develop proposed guidelines by July 1, 2009, and the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) directed to adopt guidelines by January 1, 2010.On June 19, 2008, OPR issued a technical advisory as interim guidance regarding the analysis of GHG emissions in CEQA documents (OPR 2008). The advisory indicated that a project’s GHG emissions, including those associated with vehicular traffic, energy consumption, water usage, and construction activities, should be identified and estimated. The advisory further recommended that the lead agency determine significance of the impacts and impose all mitigation measures that are necessary to reduce GHG emissions to a less than significant level.

On April 13, 2009, OPR submitted to the CNRA its proposed amendments to the state CEQA Guidelines relating to GHG emissions. On July 3, 2009, the CNRA commenced the Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking process for certifying and adopting the proposed amendments, starting the public comment period. The CNRA adopted CEQA Guidelines Amendments on December 30, 2009, and transmitted them to the Office of Administrative Law on December 31, 2009. On February 16, 2010, the Office of Administrative law completed its review and filed the amendments with the secretary of state. The amendments became effective on March 18, 2010. The amended guidelines establish several new CEQA requirements concerning the analysis of GHGs, including the following:

• Requiring a lead agency to “make a good faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project” (Section 15064.4(a)); • Providing a lead agency with the discretion to determine whether to use quantitative or qualitative analysis or performance standards to determine the significance of GHG emissions resulting from a particular project (Section 15064.4(a)); • Requiring a lead agency to consider the following factors when assessing the significant impacts from GHG emissions on the environment; • The extent to which the project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting; • Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project; • The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions (Section 15064.4(b)); and

6556 23 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Allowing lead agencies to consider feasible means of mitigating the significant effects of GHG emissions, including reductions in emissions through the implementation of project features or off-site measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required (Section 15126.4(c)).

The amended guidelines also establish two new guidance questions regarding GHG emissions in the Environmental Checklist set forth in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G:

• Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? • Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs?

The adopted amendments do not establish a GHG emission threshold, and instead allow a lead agency to develop, adopt, and apply its own thresholds of significance or those developed by other agencies or experts.3 The CNRA also acknowledges that a lead agency may consider compliance with regulations or requirements implementing AB 32 in determining the significance of a project’s GHG emissions.4

Senate Bill 375. SB 375 (Steinberg) (September 2008) addresses GHG emissions associated with the transportation sector through regional transportation and sustainability plans. Regional GHG reduction targets for the automobile and light-truck sector for 2020 and 2035, as determined by CARB, are required to consider the emission reductions associated with vehicle emission standards (see SB 1493), the composition of fuels (see EO S-1-07), and other CARB- approved measures to reduce GHG emissions. Regional metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) will be responsible for preparing a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) within their Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The goal of the SCS is to establish a development plan for the region, which, after considering transportation measures and policies, will achieve, if feasible, the GHG reduction targets. If a SCS is unable to achieve the GHG reduction target, an MPO must prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy demonstrating how the GHG reduction target would be achieved through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional transportation measures or policies. SB 375 provides incentives for streamlining CEQA requirements by substantially reducing the requirements for “transit priority projects,” as

3 “The CEQA Guidelines do not establish thresholds of significance for other potential environmental impacts, and SB 97 did not authorize the development of a statement threshold as part of this CEQA Guidelines update. Rather, the proposed amendments recognize a lead agency’s existing authority to develop, adopt and apply their own thresholds of significance or those developed by other agencies or experts” (CNRA 2009c, p. 84). 4 “A project’s compliance with regulations or requirements implementing AB 32 or other laws and policies is not irrelevant. Section 15064.4(b)(3) would allow a lead agency to consider compliance with requirements and regulations in the determination of significance of a project’s greenhouse gas emissions” (CNRA 2009c, p. 100).

6556 24 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

specified in SB 375, and eliminating the analysis of the impacts of certain residential projects on global warming and the growth-inducing impacts of those projects when the projects are consistent with the SCS or Alternative Planning Strategy.

On September 23, 2010, CARB adopted the SB 375 targets for the regional MPOs. The targets for the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) are a 7% reduction in emissions per capita by 2020 and a 13% reduction by 2035 as established in SANDAG’s RTP (SANDAG 2011). SANDAG completed and adopted its 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) in October 2011. In November 2011, ARB – by resolution – accepted SANDAG’s GHG emissions quantification analysis and determination that, if implemented, the SCS would achieve ARB’s 2020 and 2035 GHG emission reduction targets for the region.

After SANDAG’s 2050 RTP/SCS was adopted, a lawsuit was filed by the Cleveland National Forest Foundation and others. In July 2017, the California Supreme Court held that SANDAG’s EIR did not have to use EO S-3-05’s 2050 goal of an 80% reduction in GHG emissions from 1990 levels as a threshold because the EIR sufficiently informed the public of the potential impacts.

Although the EIR for SANDAG’s 2050 RTP/SCS was pending before the California Supreme Court, in 2015, SANDAG adopted the next iteration of its RTP/SCS in accordance with statutorily mandated timelines, and no subsequent litigation challenge was filed. More specifically, in October 2015, SANDAG adopted San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. Like the 2050 RTP/SCS, this planning document meets CARB’s 2020 and 2035 reduction targets for the region (SANDAG 2015). In December 2015, CARB, by resolution, accepted SANDAG’s GHG emissions quantification analysis and determination that, if implemented, the SCS would achieve CARB’s 2020 and 2035 GHG emissions reduction targets for the region.

Executive Order S-13-08. EO Order S-13-08 (November 2008) is intended to hasten California’s response to the impacts of global climate change, particularly sea-level rise. It directs state agencies to take specified actions to assess and plan for such impacts. It directs the California Natural Resources Agency, in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources, CEC, California’s coastal management agencies, and the Ocean Protection Council, to request that the National Academy of Sciences prepare a Sea Level Rise Assessment Report by December 1, 2010. The Ocean Protection Council, California Department of Water Resources, and CEC, in cooperation with other state agencies, are required to conduct a public workshop to gather information relevant to the Sea Level Rise Assessment Report. The Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency was ordered to assess within 90 days of issuance of the EO the vulnerability of the state’s transportation systems to sea-level rise. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Natural Resources Agency are required to provide land use planning guidance related to sea-level rise and other climate change impacts. The order also

6556 25 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

requires the other state agencies to develop adaptation strategies by June 9, 2009, to respond to the impacts of global climate change that are predicted to occur over the next 50 to 100 years. A discussion draft adaptation strategies report was released in August 2009, and the final 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy report was issued in December 2009 (CNRA 2009a). To assess the state’s vulnerability, the report summarizes key climate change impacts to the state for the following areas: public health, ocean and coastal resources, water supply and flood protection, agriculture, forestry, biodiversity and habitat, and transportation and energy infrastructure. The report then recommends strategies and specific responsibilities related to water supply, planning and land use, public health, fire protection, and energy conservation.

Executive Order S-14-08. EO S-14-08 (November 2008) focuses on the contribution of renewable energy sources to meet the electrical needs of California while reducing the GHG emissions from the electrical sector. This EO requires that all retail suppliers of electricity in California serve 33% of their load with renewable energy by 2020. Furthermore, the order directs state agencies to take appropriate actions to facilitate reaching this target. The Resources Agency, through collaboration with the California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW; formerly California Department of Fish and Game), is directed to lead this effort. Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding between the CEC and CDFW creating the Renewable Energy Action Team, these agencies will create a “one-stop” process for permitting renewable energy power plants.

Executive Order S-21-09. EO S-21-09 (September 2009) directed CARB to adopt a regulation consistent with the goal of EO S-14-08 by July 31, 2010. CARB is further directed to work with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and CEC to ensure that the regulation builds upon the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) program and is applicable to investor-owned utilities, publicly owned utilities, direct access providers, and community choice providers. Under this order, CARB is to give the highest priority to those renewable resources that provide the greatest environmental benefits with the least environmental costs and impacts on public health and can be developed the most quickly in support of reliable, efficient, cost-effective electricity system operations. On September 23, 2010, CARB adopted regulations to implement a “Renewable Electricity Standard,” which would achieve the goal of the EO with the following intermediate and final goals: 20% for 2012–2014, 24% for 2015–2017, 28% for 2018–2019, and 33% for 2020 and beyond. Under the regulation, wind; solar; geothermal; small hydroelectric; biomass; ocean wave, thermal, and tidal; landfill and digester gas; and biodiesel would be considered sources of renewable energy. The regulation would apply to investor-owned utilities and public (municipal) utilities.

Senate Bill X1 2. SB X1 2 (April 2011) expanded the RPS by establishing a goal of 20% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year, by December 31, 2013, and 33% by December 31, 2020, and in subsequent years. Under the bill, a renewable electrical generation

6556 26 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

facility is one that uses biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal, fuel cells using renewable fuels, small hydroelectric generation of 30 megawatts or less, digester gas, municipal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean wave, ocean thermal, or tidal current and that meets other specified requirements with respect to its location. In addition to the retail sellers covered by SB 107, SB X1 2 adds local publicly owned electric utilities to the RPS. By January 1, 2012, the CPUC is required to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by retail sellers in order to achieve targets of 20% by December 31, 2013; 25% by December 31, 2016; and 33% by December 31, 2020. The statute also requires that the governing boards for local publicly owned electric utilities establish the same targets, and the governing boards would be responsible for ensuring compliance with these targets. The CPUC will be responsible for enforcement of the RPS for retail sellers, while the CEC and CARB will enforce the requirements for local publicly owned electric utilities.

Executive Order B-16-12. EO B-16-2012 (March 2012) directs state entities under the Governor’s direction and control to support and facilitate development and distribution of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). This EO also sets a long-term target of reaching 1.5 million ZEVs on California’s roadways by 2025. On a statewide basis, EO B-16-2012 also establishes a GHG emissions reduction target from the transportation sector equaling 80% less than 1990 levels by 2050.

Executive Order B-18-12. EO S-18-12 (April 2012) directs state agencies, departments, and other entities under the governor’s executive authority take actions to reduce entity-wide GHG emissions by at least 10% by 2015 and 20% by 2020, as measured against a 2010 baseline. To accomplish these goals with respect to construction of new buildings or major renovations, EO S-18-12 further orders state agencies to implement the following measures:

• All new state buildings and major renovations beginning design after 2025 will be constructed as Zero Net Energy facilities with an interim target for 50% of new facilities beginning design after 2020 to be Zero Net Energy. • Any proposed new or major renovation of state buildings larger than 10,000 square feet use clean, on-site power generation, such as solar photovoltaic, solar thermal and wind power generation, and clean back-up power supplies, if economically feasible. • New or major renovated state buildings and build-to-suit leases larger than 10,000 square feet obtain LEED “Silver” certification or higher. • New buildings incorporate building commissioning to facilitate improved and efficient building operation. • State agencies identify and pursue opportunities to provide electric vehicle charging stations, and accommodate future charging infrastructure demand, at employee parking facilities in new buildings.

6556 27 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

EO S-18-12 also established goals for existing state buildings for reducing grid-based energy purchases and water use.

Senate Bill 605. SB 605 (September 2014) requires CARB to complete a comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants in the state no later than January 1, 2016. As defined in the statute, short-lived climate pollutant means “an agent that has a relatively short lifetime in the atmosphere, from a few days to a few decades, and a warming influence on the climate that is more potent than that of carbon dioxide.” SB 605, however, does not prescribe specific compounds as short-lived climate pollutants or add to the list of GHGs regulated under AB 32. In developing the strategy, the CARB must complete an inventory of sources and emissions of short-lived climate pollutants in the state based on available data, identify research needs to address any data gaps, identify existing and potential new control measures to reduce emissions, and prioritize the development of new measures for short-lived climate pollutants that offer cobenefits by improving water quality or reducing other air pollutants that impact community health and benefit disadvantaged communities. The draft strategy released by CARB in September 2015 focuses on methane, black carbon, and fluorinated gases, particularly hydrofluorocarbons, as important short-lived climate pollutants. The draft strategy recognizes emission reduction efforts implemented under AB 32 (e.g., refrigerant management programs) and other regulatory programs (e.g., in-use diesel engines, solid waste diversion) along with additional measures to be developed.

Executive Order B-29-15. In response to the ongoing drought in California, EO B-29-15 (April 2015) set a goal of achieving a statewide reduction in potable urban water usage of 25% relative to water use in 2013. The term of the EO extended through February 28, 2016, although many of the directives have become permanent water-efficiency standards and requirements. The EO includes specific directives that set strict limits on water usage in the State. In response to the EO B-29-15, the California Department of Water Resources has modified and adopted a revised version of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) that, among other changes, significantly increases the requirements for landscape water use efficiency and broadens its applicability to include new development projects with smaller landscape areas.

Executive Order B-30-15. EO B-30-15 (April 2015) identified an interim GHG reduction target in support of targets previously identified under S-3-05 and AB 32. EO B-30-15 set an interim target goal of reducing GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 as set forth in S-3-05. To facilitate achievement of this goal, B- 30-15 calls for an update to CARB’s Scoping Plan to express the 2030 target in terms of MMT CO2E. The EO also calls for state agencies to continue to develop and implement GHG emission reduction programs in support of the reduction targets. Sector-specific agencies in transportation, energy, water and forestry will be required to prepare GHG reduction plans by September 2015,

6556 28 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

followed by a report on actions taken in relation to these plans in June 2016. EO B-30-15 does not require local agencies to take any action to meet the new interim GHG reduction threshold. It is important to note that EO B-30-15 was not adopted by a public agency through a public review process that requires analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.4 and that it has not been subsequently validated by a statute as an official GHG reduction target of the State of California. EO B-30-15 itself states it is “not intended to create, and does not, create any rights of benefits, whether substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers employees, or any other person.”

Senate Bill 350. SB 350 (October 2015) expands the Renewable Portfolio Standard by establishing a goal of 50% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2030. In addition, SB 350 includes the goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses (such as heating, cooling, lighting, or class of energy uses upon which an energy efficiency program is focused) of retail customers through energy conservation and efficiency. The bill also requires the CPUC, in consultation with the CEC, to establish efficiency targets for electrical and gas corporations consistent with this goal. SB 350 also provides for the transformation of the California Independent System Operator into a regional organization to promote the development of regional electricity transmission markets in the western states and to improve the access of consumers served by the California Independent System Operator to those markets, pursuant to a specified process.

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) is the association of Air Pollution Control Officers representing all 35 air quality agencies throughout California. CAPCOA is not a regulatory body, but has been an active organization in providing guidance in addressing the CEQA significance of GHG emissions and climate change as well as other air quality issues.

3.3 Local

3.3.1 City of Oceanside

City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan

On May 8, 2019, the City Council voted to adopt the Climate Action Pan (CAP) as a part of their General Plan Update, which also includes development of a policy framework to the Energy and Climate Action Element (ECAE). The CAP is intended to proactively support statewide efforts to cut GHG emissions by expanding local renewable energy generation, reducing energy use, promoting recycling and reuse, facilitating active transportation, and encouraging other sustainable practices. The CAP will build upon a variety of City projects that promote energy efficiency, increased renewable energy use, water conservation, and solid waste reduction. In

6556 29 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project conjunction with developing a CAP, the City has established efficiency metric thresholds, which projects are to use to evaluate impacts from GHG emissions, in order to help the City to meet state reduction targets for 2020 and 2030. Projects are required to meet an efficiency metric threshold of 4.0 MT CO2e per service population per year (MT CO2E/SP/yr) for year 2020 and an efficiency metric threshold of 3.5 MT CO2E/SP/yr for year 2025 (City of Oceanside 2019). Projects that meet these thresholds would be considered consistent with the City’s CAP.

City of Oceanside General Plan

The Land Use and Circulation Elements of the existing City of Oceanside General Plan (City of Oceanside 2002) includes various policies related to climate change (both directly and indirectly) with the overall goal of reducing the City’s overall GHG emissions by improving energy efficiency, increasing the use of alternative modes of transportation, employing sustainable planning and design techniques, and providing environmentally sound landscaping practices. Applicable policies include the following:

Land-Use Element

Landscaping

• Policy C – Drought-tolerant materials, including native California plant species, shall be encouraged as a landscape type.

Bicycle Facilities

• Policy A – Development shall provide Class II Bikeways (bike lanes) on secondary, major, and prime arterials. • Policy D – The use of land shall integrate the Bicycle Circulation System with auto, pedestrian, and transit systems, as follows:

o Development shall provide short-term bicycle parking and long-term bicycle storage facilities such as bicycle racks, pedestal posts, and rental bicycle lockers.

o Development shall provide safe and convenient bicycle access to high-activity land uses such as schools, parks, shopping, employment, and entertainment centers.

Pedestrian

• Policy A – The construction of 5-foot wide sidewalks adjacent to the curb shall be required in new developments and street improvements.

6556 30 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Transit System

• Policy B – The City shall investigate the responsibilities of development in providing necessary on-site and off-site bus system improvements, including bus shelters within new commercial, residential, and industrial developments.

Energy

• Policy A – The City shall encourage the design, installation, and use of passive and active solar collection systems. • Policy B – The City shall encourage the use of energy efficient design, structures, materials, and equipment in land developments or uses. • Policy C – The City shall encourage the use of long-term, lower-cost energy sources.

Circulation Element

Transportation Demand Management

The City shall:

• Policy A – Encourage the reduction of vehicle miles, reduction of the total number of daily and peak hour vehicle trips, and provide better utilization of the circulation system through development and implementation of Transportation Demand Management and Transportation System Management programs. These may include the following:

o Implementation of mandatory peak hour trip reduction, o Requirements for staggered work hours, o Telecommunication, o Increased development of employment centers where transit usage is highly viable, o Encouragement of ride sharing in the public and private sector, o Provision of park-and-ride facilities adjacent to the regional transportation system, and

o Provision for transit subsidies. • Policy B – Consider the use of bicycles during the design and implementation of the street system.

6556 31 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Policy C – Update and maintain a bikeway as part of the Recreational Trails Element. These routes shall connect residential areas with schools, parks, recreation areas, major employment centers, and neighborhood commercial areas. • Policy D – Require pedestrian facilities along streets and in other locations throughout the City as noted in the Recreational Trails Element.

Public Transit and Railway Transit

The City shall:

• Policy A – Cooperate with the North County Transit District (NCTD) to attain a balance of transportation opportunities. This shall include the establishment of criteria to implement transportation improvements, short-range and long-range transit service plans, corridor improvements, transit centers, park-and-ride lots with amenities for bicyclists, and the preservation of rights-of-way for commuter rail stations. • Policy D – Continue to work with the NCTD, Caltrans, and SANDAG to plan and implement a commuter rail system. This shall include the appropriate location of stops, service schedules, feeder bus routes, parking needs, a transit terminal, park- and-ride lot, and funding. • Policy E – Work with the NCTD to assure that transit centers and major stops have adequate bicycle and pedestrian access, including secure bicycle storage. The City shall continue to work with NCTD to encourage more bus services that accommodate bicycles. • Policy F – Encourage, in coordination with the NCTD, the utilization of the multi- modal transit center by coordinating bus routes and requiring, when applicable, shuttle services to major employment centers. Improved information signage giving directions to the transit center should be a main objective for the Coast Highway and other area thoroughfares. • Policy G – Encourage, in coordination with the NCTD, additional passenger usage of railroad service by providing safe and adequate commuter parking facilities with shuttle service if appropriate, enhanced landscaping, and adjacent recreational areas. Ancillary services (e.g., cafes, postal services, small shops, and other uses that would reduce or eliminate ancillary trips) should be considered for development in and around stations and commuter parking lots. In addition, the City shall encourage mixed development in transit focus areas. • Policy H – Encourage the use of railroad freight service to minimize long-haul truck traffic by providing efficient rail freight loading access facilities.

6556 32 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Policy J – Work closely with NCTD to accelerate the building and operation of the Oceanside–Escondido Commuter Rail line.

3.3.2 City of Carlsbad

City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan

The City of Carlsbad adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in September 2015, which serves as a comprehensive, long-term strategy guide to reduce GHG emissions in the City and streamline environmental review of future development projects in the City in accordance with CEQA. The CAP outlines a comprehensive, citywide strategy with goals, policies, and actions to manage and reduce GHG emissions with emission targets through 2035; identifies actions that demonstrate Carlsbad’s commitment to achieve State GHG reduction targets by creating enforceable measures; and establishes monitoring and reporting processes to ensure targets are met. The CAP also includes an inventory of Carlsbad’s citywide and local government GHG emissions, and forecasts of future citywide and local government GHG emissions. Total Carlsbad GHG emissions for 2005 were estimated to be 630,310 MT CO2E and citywide emissions in 2011 were estimated to be 705,744 MT CO2E.

The horizon year for the CAP (2035) corresponds with the horizon year of the City of Carlsbad’s General Plan Update, and the threshold is based on a linear trajectory in emissions reductions relating to the State’s 2020 and 2050 goals to determine the 2035 target. Using the 2005 GHG inventory as the baseline, a 15% reduction by 2020 would correspond with total citywide emissions of 535,763 MT CO2E (reduction of 94,547 MT CO2E) and a 49% reduction by 2035 would correspond with 321,458 MT CO2 (reduction of 308,852 MT CO2E) (City of Carlsbad 2015).

The CAP’s community inventory consists of emissions from six sectors: residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, solid waste, and wastewater. The CAP estimates emissions reductions due to state and federal actions, and General Plan policies and actions. Based on those estimates, the CAP identifies a “gap” that will require further GHG reduction measures. The CAP identifies the following measures to close the emissions “gap,” which are generally presented as initiatives for the City of Carlsbad to pursue GHG reductions in these areas:

• Residential, commercial, and industrial photovoltaic system installations • Building cogeneration (the simultaneous production of electricity and heat) • Single-family, multi-family, and commercial efficiency retrofits • Commercial commissioning (a quality assurance process to verify that building systems are performing according to design intentions) • CALGreen building code requirements 6556 33 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Solar water heater and heat pump installations • Standards for efficient lights • Increased zero-emissions vehicle travel • Transportation demand management (TDM) • Citywide renewables projects • Water delivery and conservation measures

As outlined in the CAP’s Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting Chapter, for discretionary projects seeking to use CEQA streamlining provisions in an environmental document, the City of Carlsbad shall refer to the required measures in this CAP as mandatory conditions of approval or as mitigation. This will enable projects to benefit from CEQA streamlining provisions, while ensuring that the city can achieve the reduction targets outlined in this plan.

City of Carlsbad General Plan

The City of Carlsbad General Plan was updated and approved by the City Council on September 22, 2015, which, as discussed above, was updated in conjunction with the development of the City’s CAP. The General Plan includes strategies such as mixed-use development, higher density infill development, integrated transportation and land use planning, promotion of bicycle and pedestrian movements, and transportation demand management. It also includes goals and policies to promote energy efficiency, waste reduction, and resource conservation and recycling.

Land Use and Community Design Element Policies

• 2-P.43 – Evaluate each discretionary application for development of property with regard to the following specific criteria:

o Site and/or building design features that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the project, as outlined in the Climate Action Plan.

o Development proposals which are designed to provide safe, easy pedestrian and bicycle linkages to nearby transportation corridors.

Mobility Element Policies

• 3-P.6 – Utilize transportation demand management strategies, non-automotive enhancements (bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and connectivity), and traffic signal management techniques as long-term transportation solutions and traffic mitigation measures to carry out the Carlsbad Community Vision.

6556 34 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• 3-P.11 – Evaluate implementing a road diet to three lanes or fewer for existing four-lane streets currently carrying or projected to carry 25,000 average daily traffic volumes or less in order to promote biking, walking, safer street crossings, and attractive streetscapes.

• 3-P.12 – Design new streets, and explore funding opportunities for existing streets, to minimize traffic volumes and/or speed, as appropriate, within residential neighborhoods without compromising connectivity for emergency first responders, bicycles, and pedestrians consistent with the city’s Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategies. This should be accomplished through management and implementation of livable streets strategies and such programs like the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Plan.

• 3-P.13 – Consider innovative design and program solutions to improve the mobility, efficiency, connectivity, and safety of the transportation system. Innovative design solutions include, but are not limited to, traffic calming devices, roundabouts, traffic circles, curb extensions, separated bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian scramble intersections, high visibility pedestrian treatments and infrastructure, and traffic signal coordination. Innovative program solutions include, but are not limited to, webpages with travel demand and traffic signal management information, car and bike share programs, active transportation campaigns, and intergenerational programs around schools to enhance safe routes to schools. Other innovative solutions include bicycle friendly business districts, electric and solar power energy transportation systems, intelligent transportation systems, semi- or full autonomous vehicles, trams, and shuttles.

• 3-P.16 – Engage Caltrans, the Public Utilities Commission, transit agencies, the Coastal Commission, and railroad agency(s) regarding opportunities for improved connections within the city, including:

o Improved connections across the railroad tracks at Chestnut Avenue and other locations o Completion and enhancements to the Coastal Rail Trail and/or equivalent trail along the coastline

o Improved connectivity along Carlsbad Boulevard for pedestrians and bicyclists, such as a trail

o Improved access to the beach and coastal recreational opportunities o Improved crossings for pedestrians across and along Carlsbad Boulevard • 3-P.17 – Implement connections and improvements identified in the Mobility Element.

6556 35 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• 3-P.21 – Implement the projects recommended in the pedestrian, trails, and bicycle master plans through the city’s capital improvement program, private development conditions, and other appropriate mechanisms. • 3-P.30 – Actively pursue grant programs such as SANDAG’s Active Transportation Grant Program and Smart Growth Incentive Program to improve non-automotive connectivity throughout the city. The emphasis of grant-funded projects shall be on implementation, which includes planning documents that guide and prioritize implementation, programs that encourage the use of active transportation modes, education for the use of active transportation modes, or physical improvements themselves. • 3-P.37 – Consider supporting new development and existing businesses with various incentives (such as parking standards modifications) for implementing TDM programs that minimize the reliance on single-occupant automotive travel during peak commute hours.

Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element Policies

• 4-P.40 – Prepare a comprehensive Trails Master Plan update, that expands the existing and planned 61-mile trail system, with the following objectives:

o Connectivity between off-road trails and major on-road pedestrian and bicycle routes, such that future improvements in the trail system also contribute to linkages between important sites (beaches, lagoons, schools, commercial centers, master planned communities, and others).

o Design and designate trails as multi-use to be accessible for all user groups, including walkers, bicyclists, and equestrians (as land use policy allows). Ensure that the network provides an appropriate amount of resources for each trail type or user group.

o Greenway and trail linkages from major recreational/open space areas to other land use areas or activities, including, but not limited to, residential neighborhoods, places of employment, parks, schools, libraries, and viewpoints.

o Linkages/multi-use trails connecting businesses and residential neighborhoods to the beaches. • 4-P.52 – Participate in the implementation of transportation demand management programs on a regional basis. • 4-P.53 – To the extent practical and feasible, maintain a system of air quality alerts (such as through the city website, internet, email to city employees, and other tools) based on San Diego Air Pollution Control District forecasts. Consider providing incentives to city employees to use alternative transportation modes during alert days.

6556 36 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• 4-P.54 – Provide, whenever possible, incentives for carpooling, flex-time, shortened work weeks, and telecommunications and other means of reducing vehicular miles traveled. • 4-P.55 – Cooperate with the ongoing efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the San Diego Air Pollution Control District, and the State of California Air Resources Board in improving air quality in the regional air basin.

Sustainability Element Policies

• 9-P.1 – Enforce the CAP as the city’s strategy to reduce GHG emissions. • 9-P.2 – Continue efforts to decrease use of energy and fossil fuel consumption in municipal operations, including transportation, waste reduction and recycling and efficient building design and use. • 9-P.3 – Develop and implement a water sub-metering ordinance for new multi-family rental and mixed-use buildings. • 9-P.6 – Promote the use of on-site gray water and rainwater collection systems through education, expedited permitting review, fee exemptions and other measures. • 9-P.9 – Adopt a construction and demolition waste recycling ordinance that requires, except in unusual circumstances, all construction, demolition and renovation projects meeting a certain size or dollar value, to divert from landfills 100% of all Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete and an average of at least 50% of all remaining non-hazardous debris from construction, demolition, and renovation projects. • 9-P.12 – Continue pursuit of sustainable energy sources—such as hydroelectricity, geothermal, solar, and wind power—to meet the community’s needs. • 9-P.13 – Use the city’s CAP as the platform for delineating and implementing measures to improve energy conservation, and increase renewable energy use (such as solar) in existing and new development.

Carlsbad Building Code 18.18 Solar Energy Code

The City of Carlsbad has adopted the Uniform Solar Energy Code, 2009 Edition, as a baseline solar energy code for the city. The 2009 Uniform Plumbing Code provides provisions for a safe and functional solar energy system with minimum regulations. It applies to the erection, installation, alteration, repair, replacement, addition to, use, or maintenance of solar energy systems.

6556 37 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Carlsbad Building Code 18.30 Energy Conservation Regulations

The City of Carlsbad has adopted the California Energy Code, 2010 Edition, as a baseline energy code for the city. Specifically, 18.30.040 requires new residential units to include plumbing specifically designed to allow the later installation of a system that utilizes solar energy as the primary means of heating domestic potable water.

6556 38 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 39 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

4 CLIMATE CHANGE CONDITIONS AND INVENTORIES 4.1 Contributions to Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Per the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2015 (EPA 2017b), total United States GHG emissions were approximately 6,586.7 MMT CO2e in 2015 (EPA 2017b). The primary GHG emitted by human activities in the United States was CO2, which represented approximately 82.2% of total GHG emissions (5,411.4 MMT CO2e). The largest source of CO2, and of overall GHG emissions, was fossil-fuel combustion, which accounted for approximately 93.3% of CO2 emissions in 2015 (5,049.8 MMT CO2e). Relative to 1990, gross United States GHG emissions in 2015 are higher by 3.5%; down from a high of 15.5% above 1990 levels in 2007. GHG emissions decreased from 2014 to 2015 by 2.3% (153.0 MMT CO2e), and overall, net emissions in 2015 were 11.5% below 2005 levels (EPA 2017b).

According to California’s 2000–2015 GHG emissions inventory (2017 edition), California emitted 440.36 MMT CO2e in 2015, including emissions resulting from out-of-state electrical generation (CARB 20167a). The sources of GHG emissions in California include transportation, industry, electric power production from both in-state and out-of-state sources, residential and commercial activities, agriculture, high GWP substances, and recycling and waste. The California GHG emissions source categories and their relative contributions in 2015 are presented in Table 3.

Table 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources in California

Source Category Annual GHG Emissions (MMT CO2E) Percent of Totala Transportation 164.63 37% Industrialb 91.71 21% Electricity generationc 83.67 19% Residential and commercial uses 37.92 9% Agriculture 34.65 8% High global-warming potential substances 19.05 4% Recycling and waste 8.73 2% Totals 440.36 100% Source: CARB 2017a2016. Notes: Emissions reflect the 2015 California GHG inventory. MMT CO2e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year. a Percentage of total has been rounded, and total may not sum due to rounding. b The Aliso Canyon natural gas leak event released 1.96 MMT CO2e of unanticipated emissions in 2015 and 0.52 MMT CO2e in 2016. These leak emissions will be fully mitigated according to legal settlement and are tracked separately from routine inventory emissions. c Includes emissions associated with imported electricity, which account for 33.74 MMT CO2e annually.

6556 40 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

During 2000 to 2015, per-capita GHG emissions in California have continued to drop from a peak in 2001 of 14.0 MT per person to 11.3 MT per person in 2015, representing a 19% decrease. In addition, total GHG emissions in 2015 were approximately 1.5 MMT CO2e less than 2014 emissions. The declining trend in GHG emissions, coupled with programs that will continue to provide additional GHG reductions going forward, demonstrates that California is on track to meet the 2020 target of 431 MMT CO2e (CARB 2017a2016).

Table 2, City of Oceanside Baseline Community-Wide GHG Emissions Inventory (2005), presents the City’s 2005 community-wide GHG emissions and the percent contribution of each emissions sector (residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, and waste).

Table 2 City of Oceanside Baseline Community-Wide GHG Emissions Inventory (2005)

Source Category Annual GHG Emissions (MT CO2E) Percent of Total Commercial/Industrial 159,784 17% Residential 187,401 20% Solid Waste 31,423 3% Transportation 579,873 60% Wastewater 1,292 0% Totals 959,772 100% Source: City of Oceanside 2005. Notes: GHG = greenhouse gas; MT CO2E = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year.

As shown on Table 2, approximately 17% of the City’s community-wide GHG emissions in 2005 were attributed to commercial and industrial uses. Residential uses accounted for approximately 20%, transportation sources accounted for 60%, solid waste accounted for 3%, and wastewater accounted for the less than 1% of the City’s community-wide GHG emissions.

4.2 Potential Effects of Human Activity on Climate Change

Globally, climate change has the potential to affect numerous environmental resources through uncertain impacts related to future air temperatures and precipitation patterns. The 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Synthesis Report indicated that warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. Signs that global climate change has occurred include warming of the atmosphere and ocean, diminished amounts of snow and ice have, and rising sea levels (IPCC 2014).

In California, climate change impacts have the potential to affect sea level rise, agriculture, snowpack and water supply, forestry, wildfire risk, public health, and electricity demand and supply (CCCC 2006). The primary effect of global climate change has been a 0.2°C rise in

6556 41 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

average global tropospheric temperature per decade, determined from meteorological measurements worldwide between 1990 and 2005. Scientific modeling predicts that continued emissions of GHGs at or above current rates would induce more extreme climate changes during the twenty-first century than were observed during the twentieth century. A warming of about 0.2°C (0.36°F) per decade is projected, and there are identifiable signs that global warming could be taking place.

Although climate change is driven by global atmospheric conditions, climate change impacts are felt locally. A scientific consensus confirms that climate change is already affecting California. The average temperatures in California have increased, leading to more extreme hot days and fewer cold nights; shifts in the water cycle have been observed, with less winter precipitation falling as snow, and both snowmelt and rainwater running off earlier in the year; sea levels have risen; and wildland fires are becoming more frequent and intense due to dry seasons that start earlier and end later (CAT 2010a).

An increase in annual average temperature is a reasonably foreseeable effect of climate change. Observed changes over the last several decades across the western United States reveal clear signals of climate change. Statewide average temperatures increased by about 1.7°F from 1895 to 2011, and warming has been greatest in the Sierra Nevada (CCCC 2012). By 2050, California is projected to warm by approximately 2.7°F above 2000 averages, a threefold increase in the rate of warming over the last century. By 2100, average temperatures could increase by 4.1°F to 8.6°F, depending on emissions levels. Springtime warming—a critical influence on snowmelt— will be particularly pronounced. Summer temperatures will rise more than winter temperatures, and the increases will be greater in inland California, compared to the coast. Heat waves will be more frequent, hotter, and longer. There will be fewer extremely cold nights (CCCC 2012). A decline of Sierra snowpack, which accounts for approximately half of the surface water storage in California, by 30% to as much as 90% is predicted over the next 100 years (CAT 2006).

Model projections for precipitation over California continue to show the Mediterranean pattern of wet winters and dry summers with seasonal, year-to-year, and decade-to-decade variability. For the first time, however, several of the improved climate models shift toward drier conditions by the mid-to-late 21st century in Central and, most notably, Southern California. By late- century, all projections show drying, and half of them suggest 30-year average precipitation will decline by more than 10% below the historical average (CCCC 2012).

Wildfire risk in California will increase as a result of climate change. Earlier snowmelt, higher temperatures and longer dry periods over a longer fire season will directly increase wildfire risk. Indirectly, wildfire risk will also be influenced by potential climate-related changes in vegetation and ignition potential from lightning. However, human activities will continue to be the biggest factor in ignition risk. It is estimated that the long-term increase in fire occurrence

6556 42 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

associated with a higher emissions scenario is substantial, with increases in the number of large fires statewide ranging from 58% to 128% above historical levels by 2085. Under the same emissions scenario, estimated burned area will increase by 57% to 169%, depending on location (CCCC 2012).

Reduction in the suitability of agricultural lands for traditional crop types may occur. While effects may occur, adaptation could allow farmers and ranchers to minimize potential negative effects on agricultural outcomes through adjusting timing of plantings or harvesting and changing crop types. In addition, public health-related effects of increased temperatures and prolonged temperature extremes, including heat stroke, heat exhaustion, and exacerbation of existing medical conditions, could be particular problems for the elderly, infants, and those who lack access to air conditioning or cooled spaces (CNRA 2009a).

4 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE 4.1 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Guidance

The OPR Technical Advisory titled CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review states that “public agencies are encouraged but not required to adopt thresholds of significance for environmental impacts. Even in the absence of clearly defined thresholds for GHG emissions, the law requires that such emissions from CEQA projects must be disclosed and mitigated to the extent feasible whenever the lead agency determines that the project contributes to a significant, cumulative climate change impact” (OPR 2008). Furthermore, the advisory document indicates that “in the absence of regulatory standards for GHG emissions or other scientific data to clearly define what constitutes a ‘significant impact,’ individual lead agencies may undertake a project-by-project analysis, consistent with available guidance and current CEQA practice” (OPR 2008).

4.2 Cumulative Nature of Climate Change

Global climate change is a cumulative impact; a project participates in this potential impact through its incremental contribution combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs. There are currently no established thresholds for assessing whether the GHG emissions of a project in the San Diego Air Basin, such as the project, would be considered a cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change; however, all reasonable efforts should be made to minimize a project’s contribution to global climate change.

While the project would result in emissions of GHGs during construction and operation, no guidance exists to indicate what level of GHG emissions would be considered substantial enough to result in a significant adverse impact on global climate. However, it is generally believed that

6556 43 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

an individual project is of insufficient magnitude by itself to influence climate change or result in a substantial contribution to the global GHG inventory as scientific uncertainty regarding the significance a project’s individual and cumulative effects on global climate change remains.

Thus, GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non- cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA 2008). This approach is consistent with that recommended by the CNRA, which noted in its Public Notice for the proposed CEQA amendments that the evidence before it indicates that in most cases, the impact of GHG emissions should be considered in the context of a cumulative impact, rather than a project-level impact (CNRA 2009b). Similarly, the Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action on the CEQA Amendments confirm that an EIR or other environmental document must analyze the incremental contribution of a project to GHG levels and determine whether those emissions are cumulatively considerable (CNRA 2009c). Accordingly, further discussion of the project’s GHG emissions and their impact on global climate are addressed below.

4.3 CEQA Guidelines

With respect to GHG emissions, the CEQA Guidelines state in Section 15064.4(a) that lead agencies should “make a good faith effort, to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate” GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines note that an agency may identify emissions by either selecting a “model or methodology” to quantify the emissions or by relying on “qualitative analysis or other performance based standards” (14 CCR 15000 et seq.). Section 15064.4(b) provides that the lead agency should consider the following when assessing the significance of impacts from GHG emissions on the environment:

1. The extent a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting.

2. Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project.

3. The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions (14 CCR 15064.4(b)).

In addition, Section 15064.7(c) of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that “[w]hen adopting thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence” (14

6556 44 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

CCR 15064.7(c)). Similarly, the revisions to Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, which is often used as a basis for lead agencies’ selection of significance thresholds, do not prescribe specific thresholds. Rather, the CEQA Guidelines establish two new CEQA thresholds related to GHGs, and these will therefore be used to discuss significance of project impacts:

• Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? • Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs?

Accordingly, the CEQA Guidelines do not prescribe specific methodologies for performing an assessment, do not establish specific thresholds of significance, and do not mandate specific mitigation measures. Rather, the CEQA Guidelines emphasize the lead agency’s discretion to determine the appropriate methodologies and thresholds of significance consistent with the manner in which other impact areas are handled in CEQA (14 CCR 15000 et seq.).

Local Guidance

Prior to adoption of a CEQA-qualified Climate Action Plan (CAP) and associated development checklist, the City shall require that GHG emissions impacts for new development projects exceeding the state-prescribed 900 MT CO2E “bright line” threshold of significance be assessed utilizing the efficiency/service population methodology, which is the basis for the emissions reduction targets established in the City’s draft CAP. In line with these draft emissions reduction targets, projects scheduled to be fully implemented by 2020 are subject to a 4.0 MT CO2E/SP/yrMT/Service Population threshold, while projects scheduled to be fully implemented after 2020by 2025 are subject to a 3.05 MT CO2E/SP/yr thresholdMT/Service Population threshold. Because the project would be completed by 2024, the efficiency thresholds for 2020 and 2025 were interpolated for year 2024. The efficiency metric for 2020, 2025, and the interpolation for 2024 are illustrated below in Table 3. If the project achieves the 2024 efficiency metric, then the project’s cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be considered less than significant.

Table 3 2024 Interpolated Efficiency Metric

2020 Efficiency Metric 2025 Efficiency Metric 2024 Efficiency Metric (MT/SP/yr) (MT/SP/yr) (MT/SP/yr) Efficiency Metric – City of Oceanside CAP 4.0 3.5 3.6 Sources: City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan (City of Oceanside 2019) Notes: CAP = Climate Action Plan; MT = metric ton; SP = service population; yr = year

6556 45 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

5 EMISSION CALCULATION SOFTWARE UPDATES

At the time the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report (Dudek 2016) was prepared to support the 2016 DEIR for the project, the current version of the CalEEMod software had been CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2. Presently, the current version of CalEEMod is Version 2016.3.2, this analysis uses CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 to present the estimated emissions resulting from the updated construction information.

As a background, CalEEMod was developed for the CAPCOA in collaboration with numerous expert consultants and California Air Districts. As described in the CalEEMod User’s Guide (Section 1, Introduction, page 1; CAPCOA 2017), “[t]he purpose of CalEEMod is to provide a uniform platform … to estimate potential emissions associated with both construction and operational use for land use projects. It is intended that these emission estimates are suitable for quantifying air quality and climate change impacts as part of the preparation of [CEQA] documents.” Default data (e.g., emission factors, meteorology, and source inventory) have been provided by the various California air districts to account for local requirements and conditions. The model is periodically updated when modifications are warranted. The model is broadly accepted by lead agencies and technical experts as a comprehensive tool for quantifying air quality impacts from land use projects located throughout California. When updating CalEEMod from Version 2013.2.2 to Version 2016.3.1, and then to Version 2016.3.2, some emission factors were updated, minor changes to emission calculations were made, and bugs were fixed.

Regarding calculation of consumer products (area source), CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 identifies different consumer product ROG emission factors for parking lots (degreaser application) and parks (pesticide/fertilizer use) instead of applying one factor to all uses. The architectural coating calculations for parking lots/garages and city parks were modified so that they no longer include the open spaces.

CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 assumes compliance with 2016 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency requirements, which is more stringent than what CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 assumed (i.e., compliance with 2008 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency requirements). However, CalEEMod 2016.3.2 also assumed an increase in energy consumption.5 In other words, new buildings were assumed to be more efficient consistent with more stringent energy code requirements, but building energy use increased, so the increase in efficiency was offset by the increase in usage.

5 Per the 2009 California Energy Commission’s Residential Appliance Saturday Study, which CalEEMod 2016.3.2 is based on, the approximately 6.5% increase in annual electricity consumption compared to what was reported in the 2003 Residential Appliance Saturday Study (what CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 was based on) is due to larger home sizes (increasing space heating and cooling), and a higher saturation rate for televisions, personal computers, and office equipment.

6556 46 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

For mobile source emissions, CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 uses emissions data from the CARB Mobile Source Emissions Inventory, EMFAC, Version 2014, updated trip rates to reflect the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s 9th edition trip generation manual, updated the default fleet mix, and fixed a model error that did not calculate some mitigation measures. See Appendix B for a comparison of the CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 and Version 2016.3.2 mobile source emission factors as derived from EMFAC Version 2007 and EMFAC Version 2014, respectively. Of importance, CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 assumed one fleet mix for all land uses assumed in the model run, while CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 provides the user the opportunity to revise the fleet mix per each land use inputted.

The key differences of CalEEMod Version 2016.3.1 compared to CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 are listed below (SCAQMD 2019):

1. CARB’s OFFROAD and EMFAC 2014 updates were incorporated.

2. The methodology in calculating running loss emissions for ROG was modified from grams/trip to grams per VMT.

3. The 2013 update to Title 24, Part 6 standard (building efficiency percent reduction) was incorporated.

4. The trip rates from ITE’s 9th edition of the Trip Generation Manual were incorporated.

5. A new fleet mix tab was created to allow projects with multiple land uses to override default fleet mixes and trip lengths during the operation phase in a single model run.

6. The global warming potentials (GWPs) were updated to reflect the Fourth Assessment Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 Report (referred to as AR4) in order to be consistent with GWPs used in CARB’s Scoping Plan Update (2014).

7. A new screen was added to calculate operational emissions from certain types of stationary equipment (e.g., engines, boilers, and generators) based on user input (e.g., equipment type, number of equipment, hours of operation).

8. The calculation methodologies for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures LUT-1, LUT-4, LUT-6, LUT-9, and WSW-1 have been corrected. Also, the model has been revised so that the mitigation measures, when applied, will recognize when the user changes the defaults.

9. The consumer products and architectural coating calculations for city parks, golf courses, recreational swimming pools, and parking lots/garages have been modified so that they no longer include the open spaces.

6556 47 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

10. The calculation of non-residential architectural coating ROG emissions when the user changes the exterior area to be painted has been corrected.

11. The GHG energy usage calculation for single-family housing has been corrected.

12. The regional default data provided by the air districts/local Metropolitan Planning Organizations (e.g., architectural coating ROG content limits, percentage of wastewater treatment (septic tanks/aerobic/anaerobic), Metropolitan Planning Organization information, number of snow days vs. summer days, waste treatment plant specific effluent nitrogen, etc.) has been incorporated.

Key differences of CalEEMod 2016.3.2 compared to CalEEMod 2016.2.1 include the following:

1. The 2016 update to Title 24 (building efficiency percent reduction) was incorporated.

2. The presentation of the mitigated consumer product emissions in the summer and winter reports was corrected when Parking Land Use Type is defined in the project.

3. Fixed miscalculation of the annual fugitive dust emissions for PM10 and PM2.5 (model error caused emissions to be overestimated for projects with multiple construction years).

56 IMPACT ANALYSIS 56.1 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

Construction

Construction of the project would result in GHG emissions primarily associated with use of off- road construction equipment, on-road hauling and vendor (material delivery) trucks, and worker vehicles. GHG emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 20132016.23.2 (available online at www.caleemod.com). Emissions from construction of the proposed bridge were estimated using the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Road Construction Emission Model, Version 89.10.0 (SMAQMD 20162018).

For the purposes of estimating the project’s emissions, it was assumed that construction of the project would include the following subphases:

• Mass grading (3 months), which is further broken down into eight distinct, sequential rough grading and soil amendment phases;

6556 48 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Retaining wall construction (2 months); • Caissons (2 months); • Water, Sewer, and Storm Drain (4 months); • Buena Vista Creek bridge construction (7 months); • Construction of parking structure (7 months); • Construction of off-site features for Jefferson Street and Ring Road (3 months); • Dry utilities (1 month); • Street improvements (3 months); • Off-site 12kV underground conversion (9 months); • Construction of Hotel Building 1 (16 months); • Precise Grading (3 months); • Construction of Hotel Building 2 (13 months); • Construction of Hotel Building 3 (13 months); and • Application of architectural coatings (2 months).

For the purposes of estimating the project’s emissions, it was assumed that construction of the project would start in January 2018 2021 and reach completion in April 20202023. Because CalEEMod uses real dates (e.g., January 1, 20162021) to calculate construction emissions, assumptions were made as to key dates for each phase. The analysis presented herein assumes a construction start date of January 1, 20182021, which was the earliest date at which construction would initiate per the project’s preliminary construction schedule. Assuming the earliest start date for construction represents the worst-case scenario for GHG emissions because equipment and vehicle emission factors for later years would be slightly less due to more stringent standards for in-use off- road equipment and heavy-duty trucks, as well as fleet turnover replacing older equipment and vehicles in later years.

Total construction is expected to take approximately 23 28 months. The subphases mentioned above would experience overlap, in order to meet this schedule. This overlap is accounted for in the construction emission estimates. Approximately 24,97025,927 cubic yards of high saline/Type D soil would be exported offsite, requiring the import of approximately 24,97424,970 cubic yards of select soil. A more detailed description of the construction schedule— including information regarding subphases and equipment utilized during each subphase—is included in Appendix A.

6556 49 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

To discern primary project development phases in the CalEEMod model, construction worker and vendor trip assumptions were assigned to each building construction phase for Hotel Building 1, and Hotel Building 2; Hotel Building 3; and the parking structure. Construction worker and vendor trips for building construction were determined using CalEEMod default worker trip and vendor trip vehicle generation factors of 0.42 trip6 and 0.1639 trip, respectively, per 1,000 square feet of office/industrial space per day of construction. The construction equipment mix was provided by the applicant and represents a reasonably conservative estimate of construction activity. For the analysis, it was generally assumed that heavy construction equipment would be operating at the site for approximately 8–10 hours per day, 5 days per week (22 days per month), during project construction.

The construction equipment mix and estimated hours of operation per day used for the air emissions modeling of the project are shown in Table 3, Construction Scenario Assumptions. Table 3 4 also presents the number of worker, vendor (delivery trucks), and haul trips anticipated for each construction phase.

Table 34 Construction Scenario Assumptions

One-way Vehicle Trips Equipment Average Daily Average Daily Vendor Truck Total Haul Usage Construction Phase Worker Trips Trips Truck Trips Equipment Type Quantity Hours Rough Grading and 44 0 8111,981 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 Soil Amendment Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 (RGSA) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Other Material Handling 2 8 Equipment Scrapers 6 8 Graders 2 8 Rollers 1 8 Skid Steer Loaders 3 8 Cassions 23 0 672 Bore/Drill Rigs 1 10 Cranes 2 10 Forklifts 2 10 Pumps 2 10 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 10 Building Construction 75 26 0 Cranes 1 7

6 For commercial/retail land uses, the CalEEMod default worker trip rate is 0.32 trips per 1,000 square feet. For office/industrial land uses, the CalEEMod default worker trip rate is 0.42 trips per 1,000 square feet. Because the proposed hotel land use and parking land uses could fall under either category, the worker trip rate of 0.42 trips per 1,000 square feet was conservatively assumed.

6556 50 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 34 Construction Scenario Assumptions

One-way Vehicle Trips Equipment Average Daily Average Daily Vendor Truck Total Haul Usage Construction Phase Worker Trips Trips Truck Trips Equipment Type Quantity Hours (Hotel 1) Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 1 8 Off-Site 12 kV 5 0 0 Dumpster/Tenders 1 8 Underground Conversion Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 01 8 (Demolition) Building Construction 61 24 0 Cranes 1 7 (Parking Structure) Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 1 8 Internal Water, 3 0 0 Excavators 2 8 Sewer, and Storm Other General Industrial 1 8 Drain Equipment Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 Off-Site 12 kv 8 0 0 Excavators 1 8 Underground Other General Industrial 1 8 Conversion Equipment (Trenching) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 Building Construction 30 12 0 Cranes 1 7 (Hotel 2) Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 1 8 Demolition (Jefferson 5 0 162 Dumpers/Tenders 1 8 Street and Ring Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Road) Curb (Jefferson 5 0 0120 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Street and Ring Road) Sidewalk (Jefferson 20 0 1,1671,080 Graders 2 8 Street and Ring Other Material Handling 2 8 Road) Equipment Rollers 2 8 Skid Steer Loaders 2 8 Dry Utilities 5 0 0 Excavators 2 8 Other General Industrial 1 8 Equipment

6556 51 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 34 Construction Scenario Assumptions

One-way Vehicle Trips Equipment Average Daily Average Daily Vendor Truck Total Haul Usage Construction Phase Worker Trips Trips Truck Trips Equipment Type Quantity Hours Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 Building Construction 35 14 0 Cranes 1 7 (Hotel 3) Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 1 8 Paving 38 0 0 Cement and Mortar Mixers 6 8 Paving Equipment 4 8 Rollers 3 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Paving (Jefferson 50 0 0 Cement and Mortar Mixers 8 8 Street and Ring Paving Equipment 4 8 Road) Rollers 4 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 Precise Grading 20 0 0 Excavators 2 8 Graders 1 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 Scrapers 2 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Architectural Coating 42 0 0 Air Compressors 1 6 Notes: See Appendix A and C for details.

Table 45, Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, shows the estimated annual GHG construction emissions associated with the project, as well as the annualized construction emissions over a 20-year period per County guidance.

Table 45 Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E Year metric tons per year 20182021 2,097.501,790.32 0.440.37 0.00 2,108.461,799.65 20192022 836.921,187.07 0.180.25 0.00 840.681,164.48 20202023 17.2917.69 0.00 0.00 17.3117.70 Total 2,951.712,995.08 0.620.62 0.00 2,966.452,981.83 Annualized Construction Emissions 148.32149.09 Notes: See Appendix A and C for detailed results.

6556 52 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Construction emissions for 202217 reflect emissions calculated through CalEEMod, which were added to bridge construction emissions, modeled separately through the Sacramento Air Quality Management District Road Construction Emission Model, Version 89.10.0. Annualized emissions assumed over 20 years. CO2 – carbon dioxide; CH4 –methane; N2O – nitrous oxide; CO2E – carbon dioxide equivalent; N/A – not applicable.

As shown in Table 45, construction of the project is estimated to generate approximately 2,9662,982 MT CO2E over three years of construction. Project-generated construction GHG emissions annualized over a 20-year period per County guidance would be approximately 148 149 MT CO2E per year.

Operational

Operation of the project will result in GHG emissions from vehicular traffic, area sources, energy sources, water supply, and solid waste. To effectively analyze operational GHG emissions associated with the project, two scenarios were modeled. The first scenario represents project emissions under a without regulatory measures and project features (shown as “unmitigated” emissions in CalEEMod), which estimates project emissions absent federal, state, and local measures and without project features intended to reduce GHG emissions upon project buildout for the year 20202024. The second scenario (shown as “mitigated” emissions in CalEEMod) represents project emissions with implementation of applicable federal, state, and local GHG reduction measures and project features for the year 20202024.

Statewide emission reduction measures proposed in CARB’s Scoping Plan (CARB 2008) that are applicable to the project, as well as proposed GHG emissions reduction features, are presented in Table 56, State Measures and Project Design Features Addressing Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Table 56 State Measures and Project Design Features Addressing Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Measure or Feature Sector Emission Source State Measures Pavley I Standards Transportation Mobile Low Carbon Fuel Standards Transportation Mobile Renewable Portfolio Standard Energy Consumption (Electricity) Energy (33% by 2020) Residential and Commercial Energy Consumption (Natural Energy Gas) Renewable Portfolio Standard Energy Consumption Water Supply (33% by 2020) (Water Supply) Waste Diversion (75% reduction per AB 341) Energy Consumption Solid Waste (Solid Waste) Water Conservation Strategy Energy Consumption Water Supply (20% reduction in indoor water use per CALGreen and (Water Supply)

6556 53 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 56 State Measures and Project Design Features Addressing Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Measure or Feature Sector Emission Source 25% reduction in outdoor water use EO B-29-15) Project Design Features Electric shuttle service Transportation Mobile Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Accommodations Transportation Mobile Low flow toilet and showers and drip irrigation Energy Consumption Water Supply (Water Supply) Sources: CARB 2008 and 2014.

Mobile Sources

The project would result in GHG emissions through vehicular trips generated by the project. According to the traffic analysis conducted for the project (provided as Appendix B to the EIR), total project-generated daily traffic is estimated to be 4,260 trips per day (i.e., 10 trips per room). Annual GHG emissions from motor vehicle trips for full project buildout were quantified using CalEEMod.

Mobile Source State Measures

For both with and without regulatory measures modeling scenarios, reductions from Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standards are incorporated into the mobile source modeling assumptions in CARB’s Mobile Source Emission Mobile Inventory (EMFAC) version 20112014, as used in CalEEMod 20132016.23.2. See Section 3, Regulatory Setting, for a discussion of anticipated GHG emission reductions associated with Pavley Standards and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard.

Mobile Source Project Features

The project would include electric shuttle service during project operations, which would reduce mobile emissions generated from project vehicular traffic. However, the reduction of GHGs from the implementation of this measure is not quantifiable and was not incorporated into the project GHG emissions calculations because the annual mileage of the electric shuttle service is currently unknown.

Area Sources

In addition to estimating mobile source emissions, CalEEMod was used to estimate GHG emissions from project area sources, which include emissions from landscape maintenance equipment. Consumer product use and architectural coatings result in ROG emissions, which

6556 54 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

are analyzed in air quality analysis only (see Appendix A), and little to no GHG emissions. The project would not result in area source emissions associated with hearths as no hearths are proposed.

There were no state measures or project features identified that would reduce GHG emissions related to area sources.

Energy Sources

GHG emissions associated with energy demand were updated from CalEEMod default values, which were based on the land use type and total area (i.e., square footage) for each land use. Although The previous Title 24 standards are the 2016 Title 24 building energy efficiency standards, which became effective January 1, 2017. The 2019 Title 24 building energy standards effective as of January 1, 2020.the project would be required to meet the 2016 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations, for this analysis, energy intensity factors for electricity and natural gas were reflective the 2013 Title 24 standardsThe project would meet the 2016 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (24 CCR, Part 6) at a minimum. Based on the project’s timeline, compliance with the 2019 Title 24 standards would be more likely. However, the project operational energy emissions were not adjusted to meet the 2019 Title 24 Standards, instead, 2016 Title 24 default in CalEEMod was assumed. were used. Annual natural gas and electricity GHG emissions were estimated using the updated emissions factors for San Diego Gas and Electric, which would be the energy source provider for the project.

Energy Source State Measures

As discussed in Section 3, Regulatory Setting, SB X1 2 established a target of 33% from renewable energy sources for all electricity providers in California by 2020. The default energy intensity factors (CO2, CH4, and N2O mass emissions per kilowatt hour) for SDG&ESan Diego Gas and Electric is based on the value for SDG&ESan Diego Gas and Electric’s energy mix in 2009. This analysis is based on the California Energy Commission 2017 Power Content Label for SDG&E in order to estimate the project’s GHG emissions. The CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions intensity factors for utility energy use in CalEEMod was adjusted consistent with the SDG&E 2017 Power Content Label, which reported that SDG&E has delivered 45% of the electricity from RPS eligible resources (CEC 2018).A future energy intensity factor for project development after 2020 is based on an adjustment of the default energy intensity factor for CO2 to reflect a power mix using 33% renewable energy, which is assumed to generate no GHG emissions; the default energy intensity factors for CH4 and N2O were used to simplify the calculations and because these GHGs are not substantial contributors to the overall GHG emissions from electrical usage. The adjusted CO2 intensity factor was assumed for the with state

6556 55 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

measures scenarios while the CalEEMod default value was assumed for the without state measures scenario.

Energy Source Project Features

No project features were identified to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy sources.

Water Supply and Wastewater Generation

GHG emissions associated with water supply, treatment, and distribution7 and wastewater are classified as indirect emissions. GHG emissions were calculated based on the indoor and outdoor water use, electricity intensities, and utility intensity factors for the GHGs. Wastewater treatment also results in GHG emissions associated with the treatment system. All indoor water use was anticipated to require wastewater treatment; therefore, the electricity associated with wastewater treatment and associated emissions were estimated only for indoor potable water. Default values from CalEEMod were used to estimate the annual water use for the project.

Water Supply State Measures

CalEEMod models accounted for the GHG reductions in water conveyance associated with the RPS, as discussed in Table 5 6 and above under “Energy Source State Features". As discussed in Section 3, Regulatory Setting, a 20% reduction in indoor and outdoor water use is required per CALGreen and 25% reduction in outdoor water use is required per EO B-29-15. Additionally, landscaping for the proposed project would be in accordance with the model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881) and the project landscape plan prepared for the project. Water Supply Project Features

The project would reduce GHG emissions associated with water supply through the installation of water efficient irrigation systems and water efficient water fixtures such as low-flow toilets and showerheads. The CalEEMod default outdoor water reduction from the use of such irrigation systems is 6.1% while the default reduction for low-flow water fixtures is 20%. Solid Waste

Indirect GHG emissions associated with disposal of solid waste in landfills was also calculated in CalEEMod. GHG emissions were estimated in CalEEMod based on the tons per year of solid waste per land use, and the landfill gas collection efficiency (percentage of no gas capture,

7 Supplying water is bringing the water from its primary source such as the ground, river, or snowpack to the treatment plant. Distributing the water is bringing the water from the treatment plant to the end users (CAPCOA 2013).

6556 56 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

capture gas flare, and capture gas energy recovery). Default values in CalEEMod were assumed to estimate project-generated solid waste GHG emissions.

Solid Waste State Measures

The project would be required to comply with statewide and local solid waste diversion requirements. Compliance with the 75% diversion rate by 2020 consistent with AB 341 (25% increase from the solid waste diversion requirements of AB 939, Integrated Waste Management Act) has been included in the GHG assessment for with regulatory measures modeled scenario; it was not included in the without regulatory measures estimated emissions.

Solid Waste Project Features

No project features were identified to reduce GHG emissions associated with solid waste.

Summary of GHG Emissions

The estimated GHG emissions associated with mobile sources, energy sources, area sources, water supply, and solid waste are shown in Table 67. The estimated GHG emissions including annualized construction emissions would be 6,1375,821 MT CO2E for the year 2020 2024 in the “unmitigated” project scenario, as indicated in Table 67. The estimated GHG emissions including annualized construction emissions would be 5,5545,059 MT CO2E for the year 2020 2024 in the “mitigated” project scenario, which accounts for state GHG reduction measures and project features, as indicated in Table 67.

Table 6 7 Estimated Annual Operational Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E Emission Source metric tons per year Without Regulatory Measures and Project Design Features Area 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 Energy 2,805.872,532.5 0.100.08 0.03 2,818.312,543.8 0 4 Mobile 2,990.442,934.2 0.120.15 0.00 2,992.952,938.0 1 6 Solid Waste 48.10 2.84 0.00 107.79119.16 Water Supply and Wastewater 58.6158.61 0.38 0.01 69.4270.82 Total 5,903.035,573.4 3.433.45 0.04 5,988.495,671.9 4 0 Annualized Construction Emissions N/A 148.32149.09 Operation + Annualized Construction Total N/A 6,136.815,820.9 9 With Regulatory Measures and Project Design Features 6556 57 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E Emission Source metric tons per year Area 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 Energy 2,387.711,944.8 2,400.071,956.1 0.100.08 0.03 3 7 Mobile 2,933.152,880.6 2,935.612,884.4 0.120.15 0.00 7 5 Solid Waste 12.02 0.71 0.00 26.9529.79 Water Supply and Wastewater 34.4229.79 0.30 0.01 43.0639.56 Total 5,405.714,909.9 5367.324,867.33 1.231.24 0.04 9 Annualized Construction Emissions N/A 149.09148.32 Operation + Annualized Construction Total N/A 5,554.035,059.0 8 Threshold of 900 MT CO2E/year exceeded? N/A Yes Project Service Person GHG Efficiency N/A 8.2 City of Oceanside Efficiency Metric of 3.6 MT N/A Yes CO2E/SP/year exceeded? Notes: See Appendix B for detailed results. CO2 – carbon dioxide; CH4 –methane; N2O – nitrous oxide; CO2E – carbon dioxide equivalent; N/A – not applicable “Without State Measures and Project Design Features” matches with CalEEMod unmitigated emissions. “With State Measures and Project Design Features” matches with CalEEMod mitigated emissions.

To assess the impact of the project’s GHG emissions, the project’s estimated GHG emissions are compared to the City’s interim post-2020 efficiency metric of 3.0 6 MT CO2E/SP/yr after accounting for applicable state GHG reduction measures and project features. The project would accommodate an average of 395 guests, employ 152 full time jobs, and provide 68 part time/seasonal employees, resulting in a service population of 615 employees and guests. As such, project GHG emissions would be 9.038.2 MT CO2E/SP/yrper capita,, and exceeding the 3.0 6 MT CO2E/SP/yrMT CO2E threshold. This represents a potentially significant impact.

Mitigation Measures

MM-GHG-1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Measures. The following GHG emissions reduction measures shall be implemented:

• Use low-flow toilet and showers and drip irrigation (project design feature – quantified) • Implement electric shuttle service (project design feature – not quantified) • Maintain and manage a guaranteed return trip program for employees where vanpool and carpool reliant employees will be provided a free return trip (or to the point of commute origin), when a personal emergency situation requires it.

6556 58 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

• Require service fleet vehicles to be powered with alternative fuel technology where feasible. • Provide preferential parking for carpool, shared, electric, and hydrogen vehicles. • Exceed 2016 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards by 10%. • Equip the pool(s) and spa(s) with active solar water heating systems. • Implement energy-efficient design practices such as high-performance glazing, Energy Star compliant systems and appliances, radiant heat roof barriers, insulation on all pipes, programmable thermostats, solar access, and sealed ducts. • Prohibit use of chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. • Minimize turf areas and encourage alternative ground covers. Use native species and drought tolerant species for a minimum of 50% of the ornamental plant palette in non-turf areas for to minimize water demand. • Ensure recycling of construction debris and waste through administration by an on-site recycling coordinator and presence of recycling/separation areas.

Level of Significance After Mitigation

Implementation of MM-GHG-1 would minimize GHG emissions associated with project operations. The emission reductions associated with the measures listed in MM-GHG-1 have been quantified in CalEEMod to the extent feasible; however, most mitigation is not quantifiable and/or the extent to which some measures would apply to the project is unknown (e.g., whether high-GWP refrigerants be used).

Approximately 5457% of the project’s annual GHG emissions are from mobile; consequently, to reduce GHG emissions to a less than significant level the project would need to reduce the amount of available rooms by 89% to a total of 45 rooms to reduce the amount of vehicle trips and associated GHG emissions generated by the project. Measures implemented which help reduce the project’s GHG emissions include energy consumption, waste, and water use. However, these sources account for 4645% of the project’s annual GHG emissions and would not provide enough of a substantial reduction to the project’s GHG emissions. Although, reducing the amount of rooms provided to 45 would lessen the severity of GHG emissions to levels 3.0 0 MT CO2E screening threshold, substantially reducing the amount of rooms would fail to meet the identified goals and objects of the project and the project would not be financially feasible if such a reduction was made. Therefore, the project’s GHG contribution would be cumulatively considerable and is significant and unavoidable.

6556 59 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

56.2 Conflict with an Applicable Plan

Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

The City of Oceanside adopted their CAP in May 2019, which is a long-term plan to reduce GHG emissions from municipal operations and community activities within the City. The CAP identifies a series of GHG reduction measures, which are designed with a specific implementation timeframe (0-2 years, 2-5 years, and 5+ years), useful life, and horizon year. The reduction measures were also evaluated qualitatively to assess the level of effort required for implementation. The level of effort associated with each reduction measure is based on the convention of low, moderate, or high accounting for the amount of staff time and the financial burden on the City. Reduction measures identified within the CAP to help guide the City are categorized into the following areas: energy and buildings, water and wastewater, solid waste, transportation and land use, and agriculture and forestry. Most of the GHG reduction measures outlined within the CAP are not explicitly intended for projects to determine consistency. Rather, these measures would serve to help the City develop and implement policies in order to make progress towards meeting the state’s 2050 GHG reduction goal.

Table 8 provides an overview of measures within the CAP and the project’s consistency with them. As shown in Table 8, the project does not conflict with any of the GHG-reducing measures or goals within the City’s CAP.

Table 8 Project Consistency with the City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan

CAP Measure Project Consistency Measure E1: Renewable Energy Procurement Not Applicable. The strategies proposed would not be implemented at the project-level. Overall, the goal of this measure would be for the City to procure 75% of local energy from renewable sources by 2030, exceeding the state’s renewable portfolio standards mandate of 50% by 2030. However, the project would support this measure through the implementation of a variety of features. The energy needs for operation of the project would be minimized as the project would be designed to meet the applicable local and state energy efficiency requirements. Measure E2: Solar Photovoltaic Promotion Program Not Applicable. As discussed previously under Measure E1, while this measure does not include strategies intended for new development to implement at the project-level, the project would support this measure through the implementation of a variety of features. The energy needs for operation of the project would be minimized as the project would be designed to meet the applicable local and state energy efficiency requirements. Measure E3: Residential Energy Conservation and Consistent. The project will comply with current Title 24, Part 6, of the Disclosure Ordinance California Code of Regulations energy efficiency standards.

6556 60 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 8 Project Consistency with the City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan

CAP Measure Project Consistency Measure E4: Promotion of Low-Income Financing Not Applicable. This measure would provide financing options and other Programs alternative financing for energy efficiency upgrades to low-income households. Measure E5: Non-Residential Building Energy Not Applicable. This measure promotes use of benchmarking and time- Benchmarking and Disclosure of-sale disclosure of energy use which would help increase the efficiency of the City’s existing commercial and industrial building stock by increasing awareness of energy saving retrofits. Measure W1: Implementation of the Water Consistent. The project would be required to comply with statewide water Conservation Master Plan conservation requirements reducing water usage by 20%. Furthermore, the project would utilize low flow water fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets, and showers. The project’s irrigation system would be designed to conserve water in a manner consistent with, or more efficient than, the standards established by state water use regulations. Measure W2: Non-Residential Water Use Not Applicable. Water consumption benchmarking and time-of-sale Benchmarking and Disclosure disclosure of water use are voluntary measures in order to increase the efficiency of the City’s existing commercial and industrial building stock by increasing awareness of water savings. Measure W3: Local Water Supply Development Not Applicable. This measure would provide capital improvements to the San Luis Rey Water Reclamation Facility to help increase the availability of recycled water. However, as discussed previously under Measure W1, the project would utilize low flow water fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets, and showers. The project’s irrigation system would be designed to conserve water in a manner consistent with, or more efficient than, the standards established by state water use regulations. Measure SW1: Implementation of Zero Waste Consistent. During both construction and operation, the project would Strategic Resource Plan comply with all local and state regulations related to solid waste generation, storage, and disposal, including the California Integrated Waste Management Act, as amended. During construction, all wastes would be recycled to the maximum extent possible and would comply with CALGreen’s requirement of 65% of construction and demolition waste being diverted from landfills. Measure SW2: Beyond 2020 – Enhanced Waste Consistent. During both construction and operation, the project would Diversion comply with all local and state regulations related to solid waste generation, storage, and disposal, including the California Integrated Waste Management Act, as amended. During construction, all wastes would be recycled to the maximum extent possible. Measure TL1: Smart Growth Policies Not Applicable. This measure would help the City identify and design communities that would be better integrated with land use and transportation planning. SANDAG performed studies of land use, housing, employment, and transit system densities to identify Smart Growth Opportunity Areas (SGOA) throughout the County of San Diego. SANDAG identifies three potential SGOAs in Oceanside including a community center within ¼ -mile of the Oceanside Blvd. and El Camino Real intersection, within ¼-mile of the Oceanside Blvd. and Rancho Del Oro Dr. intersection, and with ¼-mile of the Oceanside Blvd. and Melrose Dr. intersection. While not located within these three SGOAs, the project is located within CB-2, which is an area identified by SANDAG as a

6556 61 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 8 Project Consistency with the City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan

CAP Measure Project Consistency potential town center, located on Marron Rd. Measure TL2: Expanded Electric Vehicle Charging Consistent. The project would include dedicated parking spaces and Infrastructure infrastructure dedicated for electric vehicle (EV) charging in accordance with the City’s requirements. Measure TL3: Preferential Parking Spaces for Zero Consistent. The project would include parking spaces and infrastructure Emission Vehicles dedicated for electric vehicle EV charging. Measure TL4: Expand Complete Streets Consistent. The project would promote walkability and alternative transportation by including a bike path constructed as part of the proposed bridge spanning Buena Vista Creek. Measure TL5: Transportation Demand Management Not applicable. The project would not impair the City’s ability to incorporate Plans Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce vehicle use associated with commercial development. The project would include electric shuttle service during project operations, which would reduce mobile emissions generated from project-related vehicular traffic. In addition, the project would include a bike path constructed as part of the proposed bridge spanning Buena Vista Creek. Measure AF1: Urban Forestry Program Consistent. The project would create 1.51 acres of landscaped areas (includes water quality treatment areas and landscaping/pervious grasscrete fire access adjacent to the buffer) and 3.08 acres of riparian buffer area, and would preserve 2.62 acres of Buena Vista Creek. Measure AF2: Urban Agriculture and Community Not applicable. The project would not impair the City’s ability to promote Gardens urban agriculture. Measure AF3: South Morro Hills Agricultural Lands Not applicable. The project would not result in the loss of agriculture lands. Conservation Program Measure AF4: Carbon Farming Program Not Applicable. This measure pertains to the City developing a carbon farming program to incentivize agricultural owners and business network. Source: City of Oceanside 2019.

The City of Oceanside has not adopted a CAP or GHG reduction strategy; however, the City has adopted policies within multiple chapters of their General Plan, which would help the City reduce GHG emissions. In addition, the City has adopted the Green Building Code (City Ordinance 13-ORO752-1, adopted December 4, 2013). The project would comply with the requirements of the General Plan and the Green Building Code.

As discussed in Section 3.2.2, State, EO S-3-05 established a goal to reduce statewide GHG emissions to the 1990 level by 2020, and to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 80% below the 1990 level by 2050.8 The EOs do not require the City to set a specific numeric method in

8 In adopting AB 32, the legislature did not adopt the 2050 horizon-year goal from EO S-3-05, and in the 2013- 2014 legislative session, the legislature rejected bills proposing to enact the EO 2050 goal (Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. SANDAG 2014; Professional Engineers in California Government et al. v. Schwarzenegger and Chiang 2010; OPR 2004).

6556 62 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project order to demonstrate that a project meets the state's 2030 and 2050 GHG emissions reduction targets as expressed in EO S-3-05 and EO B-30-15 and the City has not yet done so. In addition, CARB notes in the First Update to the Scoping Plan that “California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 GHG limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as required by AB 32” (CARB 2014). The project would help support achievement of the EO’s near-term 2020 goal (as codified in AB 32) and the long- term 2050 goal through the project’s in-fill, through project design features, and from implementation of MM-GHG-1.

At the regional level, SANDAG’s RTP/SCS has been adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions attributable to passenger vehicles in the San Diego region. Although the EIR for SANDAG’s 2050 RTP/SCS is still pending before the California Supreme Court, SANDAG recently adopted the next iteration of its RTP/SCS in accordance with statutorily-mandated timelines. More specifically, in October 2015, SANDAG adopted San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. Like the 2050 RTP/SCS, this planning document meets CARB’s 2020 and 2035 reduction targets for the region. While the RTP/SCS does not regulate land use or supersede the exercise of land use authority by SANDAG’s member jurisdictions (i.e., the City), the RTP/SCS is a relevant regional reference document for purposes of evaluating the intersection of land use and transportation patterns and the corresponding GHG emissions. The RTP/SCS is not directly applicable to the project because the underlying purpose of the RTP/SCS is to provide direction and guidance on future regional growth (i.e., the location of new residential and non-residential land uses) and transportation patterns throughout the City and greater San Diego County, as stipulated under SB 375. CARB has recognized that the approved RTP/SCS is consistent with SB 375 (CARB 2015). The project would be consistent with existing zoning and land use designations within the jurisdictions in which the project is located after implementing changes to existing plans including a City of Carlsbad General Plan Amendment, City of Carlsbad Zoning Change, City of Carlsbad LCP General Plan Amendment, City of Carlsbad LCP Zone Change, and Precise Plan Amendment. In addition, the traffic generated by the project would not increase vehicle trips or land use intensities as provided in the RTP/SCS. Therefore, the project would not conflict with the intent of the RTP/SCS.

Finally, the SDAPCD has not adopted GHG reduction measures that would apply to the GHG emissions associated with the project.

Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

As discussed in Section 3.2.2, State Regulations, the Scoping Plan recommends strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32, and establishes an overall framework for the measures that will be adopted to reduce California’s GHG emissions. Table 7, Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies,

6556 63 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project highlights measures that have been, or will be developed, under the Scoping Plan and the project’s consistency with Scoping Plan measures. However, CARB has adopted several statewide regulations to implement the strategies proposed in the Scoping Plan. To the extent these regulations are applicable to the project, its inhabitants, or uses, the project would comply with these regulations.As discussed in Section 3.2.2, State Regulations, the Scoping Plan recommends strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32, and establishes an overall framework for the measures that will be adopted to reduce California’s GHG emissions. Table 79, Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies, highlights measures that have been, or will be developed, under the Scoping Plan and the project’s consistency with Scoping Plan measures. However, CARB has adopted several statewide regulations to implement the strategies proposed in the Scoping Plan. To the extent these regulations are applicable to the project, its inhabitants, or uses, the project would comply with these regulations.

Table 79 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Measure Scoping Plan Measure Number Project Consistency Transportation Sector Advanced Clean Cars T-1 The project’s employees and patrons would purchase vehicles in compliance with CARB vehicle standards that are in effect at the time of vehicle purchase. Low Carbon Fuel Standard T-2 Motor vehicles driven by the project’s employees and patrons would use compliant fuels. Regional Transportation-Related T-3 The project includes design features intended to enhance transit GHG Targets orientation and encourage non-vehicular mobility to supplement ongoing statewide efforts to increase fuel efficiency standards, promote electric and hybrid vehicles, and promote vehicular fuels from renewable resources. The project would implement a bicycle and pedestrian network. Advanced Clean Transit N/A Not applicable. Last-Mile Delivery N/A Not applicable. Reduction in VMT N/A Not applicable. Vehicle Efficiency Measures T-4 Motor vehicles driven by the project’s employees and patrons and 1. Tire Pressure visitors would maintain proper tire pressure when their vehicles 2. Fuel Efficiency Tire Program are serviced. 3. Low Friction Oil The project’s employees and patrons and visitors would replace 4. Solar Reflective Automotive Paint and tires in compliance with CARB vehicle standards that are in effect Window Glazing at the time of vehicle purchase. Motor vehicles driven by the project’s employees and patrons and visitors would use low friction oils when their vehicles are serviced. The project’s employees and patrons and visitors would purchase

6556 64 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 79 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Measure Scoping Plan Measure Number Project Consistency vehicles in compliance with CARB vehicle standards that are in effect at the time of vehicle purchase. Ship Electrification at Ports (Shore Power) T-5 Not applicable. Goods Movement Efficiency Measures T-6 Not applicable. 1. Port Drayage Trucks 2. Transport Refrigeration Units Cold Storage Prohibition 3. Cargo Handling Equipment, Anti-Idling, Hybrid, Electrification 4. Goods Movement Systemwide Efficiency Improvements 5. Commercial Harbor Craft Maintenance and Design Efficiency 6. Clean Ships 7. Vessel Speed Reduction Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG Emission T-7 Heavy-duty trucks associated with the project would be in Reduction compliance with CARB standards that are in effect at the time of 1. Tractor-Trailer GHG Regulation purchase. 2. Heavy Duty GHG Standards for New Vehicle and Engines (Phase I) Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle T-8 The project would not conflict with the Medium- and Heavy-Duty Hybridization Voucher Incentive Project Vehicle Hybridization Voucher Incentive Project. Medium and Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 2 N/A Not applicable. High-Speed Rail T-9 Not applicable. Electricity and Natural Gas Sector Energy Efficiency Measures (Electricity) E-1 The project will comply with energy efficiency standards for electrical appliances and other devices at the time of building construction. In addition, the project is required to exceed 2013 current Title 24 energy requirements by 3010%. Energy Efficiency (Natural Gas) CR-1 The project will comply with energy efficiency standards for electrical appliances and other devices at the time of building construction. In addition, the project is required to exceed current Title 24 energy requirements by 10%.The project will comply with energy efficiency standards for natural gas appliances and other devices at the time of building construction. In addition, the project is required to exceed 2013 Title 24 energy requirements by 30%. Solar Water Heating (California Solar Initiative CR-2 Not applicable. Thermal Program) Combined Heat and Power E-2 Not applicable.

6556 65 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 79 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Measure Scoping Plan Measure Number Project Consistency Renewable Portfolios Standard (33% by 2020) E-3 This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. SDG&E obtains 3845% of its power supply from renewable sources such as solar and geothermal thus becoming the first California utility to meet the 3350% by the year 2020 2030 requirement. The project would purchase power that is composed of a greater amount of renewable sources. Renewables Portfolio Standard (50% by 2050) N/A This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. SDG&E obtains 45% of its power supply from renewable sources such as solar and geothermal thus becoming the first California utility to meet the 50% by the year 2030 requirement. The project would purchase power that is composed of a greater amount of renewable sources. Senate Bill 1 Million Solar Roofs E-4 Not applicable. (California Solar Initiative, New Solar Home Partnership, Public Utility Programs) and earlier solar programs Water Sector Water Use Efficiency W-1 The project would implement low-flow water fixtures including toilets and showers heads. The implementation of reclaimed water for outdoor irrigation, “drip” irrigation systems, would further reduce GHG emissions associated with water supply. Additionally, the project would include piping to support the conveyance of reclaimed water for outdoor irrigation. Water Recycling W-2 See W-1. Water System Energy Efficiency W-3 See W-1. Reuse Urban Runoff W-4 The project’s Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SWMP) provides long-term operation and maintenance of permanent best management practices (BMPs) designed to control stormwater runoff and water quality impacts. Stormwater runoff generated from the project site would be treated on site via bioretention facilities, catch basin filter units, and flow-through planters prior to its ultimate discharge into Buena Vista Creek.

Renewable Energy Production W-5 Not applicable. Green Buildings 1. State Green Building Initiative: Leading the GB-1 The project would be required to be constructed in compliance Way with State Buildings (Greening New with state or local green building standards in effect at the time of and Existing State Buildings) building construction. 2. Green Building Standards Code (Greening GB-1 The project would meet green building standards that are in effect New Public Schools, Residential and at the time of design and construction. Commercial Buildings) 3. Beyond Code: Voluntary Programs at the GB-1 The project would be required to be constructed in compliance Local Level (Greening New Public Schools, with local green building standards in effect at the time of building

6556 66 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 79 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Measure Scoping Plan Measure Number Project Consistency Residential and Commercial Buildings) construction. 4. Greening Existing Buildings (Greening GB-1 Applicable for existing buildings only. Not applicable for the Existing Homes and Commercial Buildings) project except as future standards may become applicable to existing buildings. Industry Sector Energy Efficiency and Co-Benefits I-1 Not applicable. Audits for Large Industrial Sources Oil and Gas Extraction GHG Emission I-2 Not applicable. Reduction Reduce GHG Emissions by 20% in Oil N/A Not applicable. Refinery Sector GHG Emissions Reduction from Natural Gas I-3 Not applicable. Transmission and Distribution Refinery Flare Recovery Process I-4 Not applicable. Improvements Work with the local air districts to evaluate I-5 Not applicable. amendments to their existing leak detection and repair rules for industrial facilities to include methane leaks. Recycling and Waste Management Sector Landfill Methane Control Measure RW-1 Applicable for certain municipal solid waste landfills. Not applicable for the project. Increasing the Efficiency of Landfill Methane RW-2 Applicable for certain municipal solid waste landfills. Not Capture applicable for the project. Mandatory Commercial Recycling RW-3 Both construction and operations of the project would comply with all state regulations related to solid waste generation, storage, and disposal, including the California Integrated Waste Management Act as amended. During construction, all wastes would be recycled to the maximum extent possible. Increase Production and Markets for Compost RW-3 Not applicable. and Other Organics Anaerobic/Aerobic Digestion RW-3 Not applicable. Extended Producer Responsibility RW-3 Not applicable. Environmentally Preferable Purchasing RW-3 Not applicable. Forests Sector Sustainable Forest Target F-1 Not applicable. High GWP Gases Sector Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Systems: H-1 The project’s employees would be prohibited from performing air Reduction of Refrigerant Emissions from Non- conditioning repairs and required to use professional servicing. professional Servicing SF6 Limits in Non-utility and Non- H-2 Not applicable. semiconductor Applications

6556 67 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

Table 79 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Measure Scoping Plan Measure Number Project Consistency Reduction of Perfluorocarbons in H-3 Not applicable. Semiconductor Manufacturing Limit High GWP Use in Consumer Products H-4 The project’s employees would use consumer products that would comply with the regulations that are in effect at the time of manufacture. Air Conditioning Refrigerant Leak Test During H-5 Motor vehicles driven by the project’s employees and patrons Vehicle Smog Check would comply with the leak test requirements during smog checks. Stationary Equipment Refrigerant H-6 Not applicable. Management Program – Refrigerant Tracking/Reporting/Repair Program Stationary Equipment Refrigerant H-6 Not applicable. Management Program – Specifications for Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration SF6 Leak Reduction Gas Insulated Switchgear H-6 Not applicable. 40% Reduction in Methane and N/A Not applicable. Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) Emissions 50% Reduction in Black Carbon Emissions N/A Not applicable. Agriculture Sector Methane Capture at Large Dairies A-1 Not applicable. Source: CARB 20142017. Notes: GHG = greenhouse gas; CARB = California Air Resources Board; VMT = vehicle miles traveled; SB = Senate Bill; N/A = not applicable; SF6 = sulfur hexafluoride.

Based on the analysis in Table 59, the project would be consistent with the applicable strategies and measures in the Scoping Plan.

The project was not found to conflict with or obstruct the City’s General Plan, EO S-3-05 and EO B-30-15, the 2050 RTP/SCS, or CARB’s Scoping Plan. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs impacts. This impact is considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures

None required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation

Impacts would be less than significant without mitigation.

6556 68 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 69 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

6 REFERENCES

14 CCR 15000–15387 and Appendices A–L. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.

75 FR 25324–25728. Final rule: Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. July 6, 2010.

77 FR 62624–63200. Final rule: 2017 and Later Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. October 15, 2012.

CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 2008. CEQA & Climate Change: Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. January 2008.

CAPCOA. 2013. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) User’s Guide.

CARB. (California Air Resources Board). 2008. Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. October, approved December 12, 2008. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/psp.pdf.

CARB. 2014. “First Update to the AB32 Scoping Plan.” May 2014. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/updatedscopingplan2013.htm.

CARB. 2015. Executive Order G-15-075. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). CARB Acceptance of GHG Quantification Determination. December 2015.

CARB. 2016. “California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000–2014 – by Category as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan.” Last updated March 30, 2016.

CARB. 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. December 2017. Accessed March 2018. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf.

CAT (California Climate Action Team). 2006. Final 2006 Climate Action Team Report to the Governor and Legislature. Sacramento, California: CAT. March 2006.

CAT. 2010a. Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature. Sacramento, California: CAT. December 2010. Accessed January 2015. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CAT-1000-2010-005/ CAT-1000-2010-005.PDF.

6556 70 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

CAT. 2010b. State of California Sea-Level Rise Interim Guidance Document. Sacramento, California: CAT. October 2010. Accessed July 2015. http://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/project_pages/Climate/SLR_Guidance_Document. pdf .

CAT. 2010c. Climate Action Team Biennial Report. April 2010. Accessed January 2015. Sacramento, California: CAT. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/ CAT-1000-2010-004/CAT-1000-2010-004.PDF.

CCCC (California Climate Change Center). 2006. Our Changing Climate: Assessing the Risks to California. CEC-500-2006-077. July 2006. Accessed February 2014. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-500-2006-077/ CEC-500-2006-077.PDF.

CCCC. 2012. Our Changing Climate 2012: Vulnerability & Adaptation to the Increasing Risks from Climate Change in California. July 2012. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/ CEC-500-2012-007/CEC-500-2012-007.pdf

CEC (California Energy Commission). 2012. “Building Energy Efficiency Standards.” Frequently Asked Questions. May 2012.

CEC (California Energy Commission). 2016. 2016 Building Efficiency Standards.

CEC. 2018. 2017 Power Content Label - San Diego Gas & Electric. Accessed April 2019. https://www.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/SDG_and_E_2017_PCL.pdf.

CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2009a. 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy: A Report to the Governor of the State of California in Response to Executive Order S-13-2008. http://resources.ca.gov/docs/climate/Statewide_Adaptation_Strategy.pdf.

CNRA. 2009b. “Notice of Public Hearings and Notice of Proposed Amendment of Regulations Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. Sacramento, California: CNRA.” http://www.ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/ Notice_of_Proposed_Action.pdf.

CNRA. 2009c. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97. December 2009. http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf.

6556 71 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

City of Carlsbad. 2006. City of Carlsbad General Plan. Updated September 2015.

City of Carlsbad. 2015. Climate Action Plan.

City of Oceanside. 2002. City of Oceanside General Plan.

City of Oceanside. 2005. City of Oceanside Climate Action Plan Info Sheet.

City of Oceanside. 2019. Oceanside Climate Action Plan.

County of San Diego. 2015. 2015 GHG Guidance: Recommended Approach to Addressing Climate Change in CEQA Documents. Department of Planning and Development Services. January 21, 2015.

Dudek. 2016. Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2016. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014 EPA 430-R-16-002. Washington, D.C.: EPA. April 15, 2016. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG- Inventory-2016-Main-Text.pdf.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Edited by The Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, and L. Meyer. A Report of the IPCC. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014.

National Climatic Data Center. 2015. “Global Warming Frequently Asked Questions.” Asheville, North Carolina: National Climatic Data Center. Accessed January 2015. http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html

OPR (California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research). 2008. Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review.

RBF. 2015. The Inns at Buena Vista Creek Traffic Impact Analysis Report.

SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments). 2011. 2050 Regional Transportation Plan. October 2011. http://www.sandag.org/uploads/2050RTP/F2050rtp_all.pdf.

6556 72 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

SANDAG. 2015. San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. October 2015. Accessed October 2016. http://www.sdforward.com/pdfs/RP_final/The%20Plan%20-%20combined.pdf.

SJVAPCD (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District). 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI_3-19-15.pdf.

SMAQMD (Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District). 20162018. Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 89.10.0.

6556 73 September 2016March 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Technical Report for the Inns at Buena Vista Creek Project

NTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6556 74 September 2016March 2020

APPENDIX A Construction Schedule; CalEEMod Version 20132016.23.2 and SMAQMD Road Construction Emission Model Version 89.10.0 Modeling and Estimated Emissions

Page 1 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/24/2020 8:30 AM

Inns at BVC Construction Emissions San Diego County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

General Office Building 4.00 1000sqft 0.09 4,000.00 0

Parking Lot 47.00 Space 0.42 18,800.00 0

Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 432.00 Space 3.89 172,800.00 0

Hotel 426.00 Room 8.10 326,515.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 40

Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2020

Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric

CO2 Intensity 720.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N2O Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - Inns at Buena Vista. San Diego County (San Diego Air Basin). Land Use - Development of 426 room hotel, 479 parking spaces (432 space parking structure, 47 space parking lot), and a 4,000 SF pavilion building on a 12.5 acre site. Construction Phase - Construction activities would begin July 2017 with completion approximately August 2019. Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Page 2 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - Modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Off-road Equipment - modified Trips and VMT - Assume pavilion constructed with hotel 1. Assume 1.25 trips (x2) per equipment in Caisson phase. Demolition - modifed Grading - modified Architectural Coating - See Arch coating appendix Vehicle Trips - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Area Coating - Page 3 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water exposed area twice daily for a 55% reduction in PM emissions. Equipment with a HP of 150 or higher required to be Tier 3, all equipment with a HP of 50 to 149 is required to be Tier 2. Fleet Mix -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 165,258.00 176,754.00

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 150.00

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 100.00

tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 250 0

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 165258 251940

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 495773 688193

tblAreaCoating Area_Parking 11496 0

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 14.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 7.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 14.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 10.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 Page 4 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 32.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 263.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 285.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 44.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 285.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 350.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 154.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 9.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 4.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 14.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 9.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 9.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 5.00 Page 5 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 8.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 4.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 36.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 67.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 67.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 17.00

tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.81 4.33

tblEnergyUse LightingElect 4.50 5.08

tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.88

tblEnergyUse LightingElect 1.75 2.63

tblEnergyUse T24E 4.66 5.69

tblEnergyUse T24E 4.78 5.84

tblEnergyUse T24NG 15.99 16.83

tblEnergyUse T24NG 47.27 49.75

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 54.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 5.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 1.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 36.00 1.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 167.50 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 16.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,298.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,120.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,120.00 Page 6 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,178.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,178.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,885.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 942.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 8,480.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,591.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,178.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 3,424.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,201.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,201.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,223.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,223.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,957.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 978.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 8,805.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,691.00

tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,223.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 618,552.00 326,515.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 14.20 8.10 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 Page 7 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 132.00 130.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 132.00 130.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 Page 8 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 367.00 361.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 221.00 205.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 212.00 208.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 162.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 88.00 87.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 88.00 87.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 88.00 87.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 168.00 150.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 168.00 150.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 84.00 175.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 65.00 64.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 65.00 64.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.41 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.40 0.20 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.40 0.20 Page 9 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.74 0.60 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 Page 10 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 Page 11 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 10.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 10.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 825.00 420.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 530.00 270.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 530.00 270.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 295.00 150.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 295.00 150.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 471.00 240.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 80.00 120.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 236.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 2,120.00 1,080.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 672.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 648.00 330.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 295.00 150.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 86.00 12.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 86.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 86.00 14.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 86.00 26.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 86.00 24.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 219.00 30.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 5.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 5.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 219.00 23.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 219.00 35.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 44.00 42.00 Page 12 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 3.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 219.00 75.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 219.00 61.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 10.00 3.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 2.37

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.98

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 11.01 Page 13 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2021 1.1147 10.6621 10.1899 0.0202 0.4200 0.5111 0.9311 0.1246 0.4780 0.6026 0.0000 1,790.325 1,790.325 0.3729 0.0000 1,799.648 2 2 1 2022 1.3191 4.8463 4.9801 9.5500e- 0.3415 0.2264 0.5679 0.1472 0.2123 0.3595 0.0000 840.4474 840.4474 0.1782 0.0000 844.9029 003 2023 0.2785 0.0466 0.0909 2.0000e- 0.0113 2.4500e- 0.0137 3.0000e- 2.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 17.6858 17.6858 7.5000e- 0.0000 17.7045 004 003 003 003 003 004 Maximum 1.3191 10.6621 10.1899 0.0202 0.4200 0.5111 0.9311 0.1472 0.4780 0.6026 0.0000 1,790.325 1,790.325 0.3729 0.0000 1,799.648 2 2 1

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2021 0.7600 12.6538 11.0887 0.0202 0.3190 0.4653 0.7843 0.0907 0.4651 0.5557 0.0000 1,790.323 1,790.323 0.3729 0.0000 1,799.646 6 6 5 2022 1.1506 5.8891 5.4105 9.5500e- 0.2132 0.2255 0.4388 0.0790 0.2254 0.3044 0.0000 840.4466 840.4466 0.1782 0.0000 844.9021 003 2023 0.2759 0.0817 0.0917 2.0000e- 0.0113 3.2600e- 0.0145 3.0000e- 3.2600e- 6.2500e- 0.0000 17.6857 17.6857 7.5000e- 0.0000 17.7045 004 003 003 003 003 004 Maximum 1.1506 12.6538 11.0887 0.0202 0.3190 0.4653 0.7843 0.0907 0.4651 0.5557 0.0000 1,790.323 1,790.323 0.3729 0.0000 1,799.646 6 6 5

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Percent 19.39 -19.73 -8.71 0.00 29.67 6.20 18.19 37.17 -0.15 10.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Page 14 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week

1 RGSA -1 Grading 1/1/2021 1/20/2021 5 14

2 Caissons Building Construction 1/1/2021 3/3/2021 5 44

3 RGSA - 2 Grading 1/21/2021 2/4/2021 5 11

4 Hotel Structure 1 Building Construction 2/1/2021 6/3/2022 5 350

5 12kv Underground - Demo Demolition 2/2/2021 2/5/2021 5 4

6 Parking Structure Building Construction 2/2/2021 9/3/2021 5 154

7 Internal Storm Drain, Sewer and Trenching 2/5/2021 6/4/2021 5 86 Water 8 RGSA - 3 Grading 2/6/2021 2/12/2021 5 5

9 12kV Underground - Trenching Trenching 2/6/2021 11/4/2021 5 194

10 RGSA - 4 Grading 2/13/2021 2/25/2021 5 9

11 RGSA - 5 Grading 2/26/2021 3/10/2021 5 9

12 RGSA - 6 Grading 3/10/2021 3/16/2021 5 5

13 RGSA - 7 Grading 3/17/2021 3/23/2021 5 5

14 RGSA - 8 Grading 3/22/2021 3/31/2021 5 8

15 Hotel Structure 2 Building Construction 5/1/2021 6/3/2022 5 285

16 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demolition 7/3/2021 7/15/2021 5 9 Demo 17 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Grading 7/16/2021 7/21/2021 5 4

18 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Grading 7/22/2021 9/9/2021 5 36 sidewalk 19 Dry Utilities Trenching 8/1/2021 9/1/2021 5 23

20 Hotel Structure 3 Building Construction 8/1/2021 9/2/2022 5 285

21 Paving Paving 8/1/2021 11/2/2021 5 67

22 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving 9/9/2021 10/1/2021 5 17 Paving 23 Precise Grading Grading 3/1/2022 6/1/2022 5 67

24 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/1/2022 4/4/2023 5 263

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Page 15 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0

Acres of Paving: 4.31

Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 495,773; Non-Residential Outdoor: 176,754; Striped Parking

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor RGSA -1 Crawler Tractors 0 0.00 208 0.43

RGSA -1 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA -1 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA -1 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA -1 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA -1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

Caissons Bore/Drill Rigs 1 10.00 205 0.50

Caissons Cranes 2 10.00 226 0.29

Caissons Forklifts 2 10.00 89 0.20

Caissons Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74

Caissons Pumps 2 10.00 175 0.60

Caissons Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 10.00 97 0.37

Caissons Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45

RGSA - 2 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 2 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 2 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 2 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 1 Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29

Hotel Structure 1 Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Hotel Structure 1 Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Hotel Structure 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 1 Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

12kv Underground - Demo Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Page 16 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

12kv Underground - Demo Dumpers/Tenders 1 8.00 16 0.38

12kv Underground - Demo Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

12kv Underground - Demo Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

12kv Underground - Demo Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Parking Structure Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29

Parking Structure Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Parking Structure Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Parking Structure Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Parking Structure Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

Internal Storm Drain, Sewer and Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Water Internal Storm Drain, Sewer and Other General Industrial 1 8.00 87 0.34 Water Equipment Internal Storm Drain, Sewer and Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Water RGSA - 3 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 3 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 3 Other Material Handling 2 8.00 150 0.20 Equipment RGSA - 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 3 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

12kV Underground - Trenching Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38

12kV Underground - Trenching Other General Industrial 1 8.00 87 0.34 Equipment 12kV Underground - Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

RGSA - 4 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 4 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 4 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 4 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

RGSA - 5 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 5 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 5 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 5 Scrapers 6 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Page 17 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

RGSA - 6 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 6 Graders 2 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 6 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 6 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 6 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

RGSA - 7 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 7 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 7 Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38

RGSA - 7 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 7 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

RGSA - 8 Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

RGSA - 8 Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

RGSA - 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

RGSA - 8 Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

RGSA - 8 Skid Steer Loaders 3 8.00 64 0.37

RGSA - 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 2 Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29

Hotel Structure 2 Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Hotel Structure 2 Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Hotel Structure 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 2 Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo Dumpers/Tenders 1 8.00 16 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48 Page 18 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Graders 0 8.00 174 0.41

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Graders 2 8.00 174 0.41

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Other Material Handling 2 8.00 150 0.20 Equipment Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 255 0.40

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Scrapers 0 8.00 361 0.48

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Skid Steer Loaders 2 8.00 64 0.37

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37

Dry Utilities Excavators 2 8.00 174 0.41

Dry Utilities Other General Industrial 1 8.00 87 0.34 Equipment Dry Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 3 Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29

Hotel Structure 3 Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Hotel Structure 3 Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Hotel Structure 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Hotel Structure 3 Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 6 8.00 9 0.56

Paving Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Paving Paving Equipment 4 8.00 130 0.36

Paving Rollers 3 8.00 80 0.38

Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 8 8.00 9 0.56

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving Paving Equipment 4 8.00 130 0.36

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving Rollers 4 8.00 80 0.38

Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37

Precise Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38

Precise Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Precise Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Page 19 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Precise Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 361 0.48

Precise Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Vehicle Class Class RGSA -1 2 5.00 0.00 420.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Caissons 9 23.00 0.00 672.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

RGSA - 2 2 3.00 0.00 330.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Hotel Structure 1 9 75.00 26.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

12kv Underground - 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Demo Parking Structure 9 61.00 24.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Internal Storm Drain, 4 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Sewer and Water RGSA - 3 2 5.00 0.00 150.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

12kV Underground - 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching RGSA - 4 0 0.00 0.00 270.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

RGSA - 5 6 15.00 0.00 270.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

RGSA - 6 2 5.00 0.00 150.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

RGSA - 7 1 3.00 0.00 150.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

RGSA - 8 3 8.00 0.00 240.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Hotel Structure 2 9 30.00 12.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Off-site (Jefferson & 3 5.00 0.00 120.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Ring) - Demo Off-site (Jefferson & 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Ring) - curb Off-site (Jefferson & 8 20.00 0.00 1,080.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Ring) - sidewalk Dry Utilities 4 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Hotel Structure 3 9 35.00 14.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 15 38.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Off-site (Jefferson & 20 50.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Ring) - Paving Precise Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 42.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Page 20 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area

3.2 RGSA -1 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.0933 0.0000 0.0933 0.0473 0.0000 0.0473 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0124 0.1280 0.1018 1.2000e- 5.8400e- 5.8400e- 5.3800e- 5.3800e- 0.0000 10.9439 10.9439 3.5400e- 0.0000 11.0324 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0124 0.1280 0.1018 1.2000e- 0.0933 5.8400e- 0.0991 0.0473 5.3800e- 0.0527 0.0000 10.9439 10.9439 3.5400e- 0.0000 11.0324 004 003 003 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.5800e- 0.0548 0.0135 1.6000e- 3.5900e- 1.7000e- 3.7600e- 9.9000e- 1.6000e- 1.1500e- 0.0000 15.9940 15.9940 1.4400e- 0.0000 16.0301 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.2000e- 9.0000e- 8.7000e- 0.0000 2.8000e- 0.0000 2.8000e- 7.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 0.2452 0.2452 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.2454 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 1.7000e- 0.0549 0.0144 1.6000e- 3.8700e- 1.7000e- 4.0400e- 1.0600e- 1.6000e- 1.2300e- 0.0000 16.2392 16.2392 1.4500e- 0.0000 16.2755 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Page 21 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.0364 0.0000 0.0364 0.0185 0.0000 0.0185 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.0200e- 0.0584 0.0655 1.2000e- 2.2200e- 2.2200e- 2.2200e- 2.2200e- 0.0000 10.9439 10.9439 3.5400e- 0.0000 11.0324 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 3.0200e- 0.0584 0.0655 1.2000e- 0.0364 2.2200e- 0.0386 0.0185 2.2200e- 0.0207 0.0000 10.9439 10.9439 3.5400e- 0.0000 11.0324 003 004 003 003 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.5800e- 0.0548 0.0135 1.6000e- 3.5900e- 1.7000e- 3.7600e- 9.9000e- 1.6000e- 1.1500e- 0.0000 15.9940 15.9940 1.4400e- 0.0000 16.0301 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.2000e- 9.0000e- 8.7000e- 0.0000 2.8000e- 0.0000 2.8000e- 7.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 0.2452 0.2452 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.2454 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 1.7000e- 0.0549 0.0144 1.6000e- 3.8700e- 1.7000e- 4.0400e- 1.0600e- 1.6000e- 1.2300e- 0.0000 16.2392 16.2392 1.4500e- 0.0000 16.2755 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Page 22 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.3 Caissons - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0727 0.7212 0.6505 1.4200e- 0.0335 0.0335 0.0316 0.0316 0.0000 123.2917 123.2917 0.0250 0.0000 123.9171 003 Total 0.0727 0.7212 0.6505 1.4200e- 0.0335 0.0335 0.0316 0.0316 0.0000 123.2917 123.2917 0.0250 0.0000 123.9171 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 2.5200e- 0.0878 0.0217 2.6000e- 5.7500e- 2.7000e- 6.0100e- 1.5800e- 2.5000e- 1.8300e- 0.0000 25.5905 25.5905 2.3100e- 0.0000 25.6482 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.7600e- 1.2500e- 0.0126 4.0000e- 4.0600e- 3.0000e- 4.0900e- 1.0800e- 3.0000e- 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.5446 3.5446 1.0000e- 0.0000 3.5472 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 4.2800e- 0.0890 0.0343 3.0000e- 9.8100e- 3.0000e- 0.0101 2.6600e- 2.8000e- 2.9300e- 0.0000 29.1351 29.1351 2.4100e- 0.0000 29.1954 003 004 003 004 003 004 003 003 Page 23 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0378 0.7465 0.7521 1.4200e- 0.0289 0.0289 0.0289 0.0289 0.0000 123.2915 123.2915 0.0250 0.0000 123.9169 003 Total 0.0378 0.7465 0.7521 1.4200e- 0.0289 0.0289 0.0289 0.0289 0.0000 123.2915 123.2915 0.0250 0.0000 123.9169 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 2.5200e- 0.0878 0.0217 2.6000e- 5.7500e- 2.7000e- 6.0100e- 1.5800e- 2.5000e- 1.8300e- 0.0000 25.5905 25.5905 2.3100e- 0.0000 25.6482 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.7600e- 1.2500e- 0.0126 4.0000e- 4.0600e- 3.0000e- 4.0900e- 1.0800e- 3.0000e- 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.5446 3.5446 1.0000e- 0.0000 3.5472 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 4.2800e- 0.0890 0.0343 3.0000e- 9.8100e- 3.0000e- 0.0101 2.6600e- 2.8000e- 2.9300e- 0.0000 29.1351 29.1351 2.4100e- 0.0000 29.1954 003 004 003 004 003 004 003 003 Page 24 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.4 RGSA - 2 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.8600e- 0.0000 8.8600e- 9.7000e- 0.0000 9.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 2.0600e- 0.0209 0.0249 3.0000e- 1.2300e- 1.2300e- 1.1300e- 1.1300e- 0.0000 3.0027 3.0027 9.7000e- 0.0000 3.0270 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 2.0600e- 0.0209 0.0249 3.0000e- 8.8600e- 1.2300e- 0.0101 9.7000e- 1.1300e- 2.1000e- 0.0000 3.0027 3.0027 9.7000e- 0.0000 3.0270 003 005 003 003 004 003 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.2400e- 0.0431 0.0106 1.3000e- 2.8200e- 1.3000e- 2.9500e- 7.8000e- 1.2000e- 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5668 12.5668 1.1300e- 0.0000 12.5951 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 6.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 0.0000 0.1157 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 1.3000e- 0.0431 0.0110 1.3000e- 2.9500e- 1.3000e- 3.0800e- 8.2000e- 1.2000e- 9.4000e- 0.0000 12.6823 12.6823 1.1300e- 0.0000 12.7108 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 Page 25 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.4500e- 0.0000 3.4500e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 1.6000e- 0.0331 0.0258 3.0000e- 1.3400e- 1.3400e- 1.3400e- 1.3400e- 0.0000 3.0027 3.0027 9.7000e- 0.0000 3.0270 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 1.6000e- 0.0331 0.0258 3.0000e- 3.4500e- 1.3400e- 4.7900e- 3.8000e- 1.3400e- 1.7200e- 0.0000 3.0027 3.0027 9.7000e- 0.0000 3.0270 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.2400e- 0.0431 0.0106 1.3000e- 2.8200e- 1.3000e- 2.9500e- 7.8000e- 1.2000e- 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5668 12.5668 1.1300e- 0.0000 12.5951 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 6.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 0.0000 0.1157 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 1.3000e- 0.0431 0.0110 1.3000e- 2.9500e- 1.3000e- 3.0800e- 8.2000e- 1.2000e- 9.4000e- 0.0000 12.6823 12.6823 1.1300e- 0.0000 12.7108 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 Page 26 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.5 Hotel Structure 1 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.2272 2.0808 1.9845 3.2200e- 0.1146 0.1146 0.1077 0.1077 0.0000 276.8127 276.8127 0.0667 0.0000 278.4799 003 Total 0.2272 2.0808 1.9845 3.2200e- 0.1146 0.1146 0.1077 0.1077 0.0000 276.8127 276.8127 0.0667 0.0000 278.4799 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 9.6500e- 0.3206 0.0855 8.4000e- 0.0207 6.8000e- 0.0214 5.9800e- 6.5000e- 6.6300e- 0.0000 81.5693 81.5693 6.0500e- 0.0000 81.7206 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0313 0.0223 0.2248 7.0000e- 0.0722 5.1000e- 0.0727 0.0192 4.7000e- 0.0197 0.0000 63.0470 63.0470 1.8100e- 0.0000 63.0922 004 004 004 003 Total 0.0409 0.3430 0.3104 1.5400e- 0.0929 1.1900e- 0.0941 0.0252 1.1200e- 0.0263 0.0000 144.6163 144.6163 7.8600e- 0.0000 144.8129 003 003 003 003 Page 27 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1530 2.5715 2.1645 3.2200e- 0.1048 0.1048 0.1048 0.1048 0.0000 276.8124 276.8124 0.0667 0.0000 278.4796 003 Total 0.1530 2.5715 2.1645 3.2200e- 0.1048 0.1048 0.1048 0.1048 0.0000 276.8124 276.8124 0.0667 0.0000 278.4796 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 9.6500e- 0.3206 0.0855 8.4000e- 0.0207 6.8000e- 0.0214 5.9800e- 6.5000e- 6.6300e- 0.0000 81.5693 81.5693 6.0500e- 0.0000 81.7206 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0313 0.0223 0.2248 7.0000e- 0.0722 5.1000e- 0.0727 0.0192 4.7000e- 0.0197 0.0000 63.0470 63.0470 1.8100e- 0.0000 63.0922 004 004 004 003 Total 0.0409 0.3430 0.3104 1.5400e- 0.0929 1.1900e- 0.0941 0.0252 1.1200e- 0.0263 0.0000 144.6163 144.6163 7.8600e- 0.0000 144.8129 003 003 003 003 Page 28 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.5 Hotel Structure 1 - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0935 0.8545 0.8980 1.4800e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0417 0.0417 0.0000 126.9208 126.9208 0.0304 0.0000 127.6799 003 Total 0.0935 0.8545 0.8980 1.4800e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0417 0.0417 0.0000 126.9208 126.9208 0.0304 0.0000 127.6799 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 4.1100e- 0.1388 0.0371 3.8000e- 9.4900e- 2.7000e- 9.7600e- 2.7400e- 2.6000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 37.0319 37.0319 2.6900e- 0.0000 37.0991 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0136 9.3300e- 0.0957 3.1000e- 0.0331 2.3000e- 0.0333 8.7900e- 2.1000e- 9.0000e- 0.0000 27.8373 27.8373 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.8562 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0177 0.1481 0.1328 6.9000e- 0.0426 5.0000e- 0.0431 0.0115 4.7000e- 0.0120 0.0000 64.8692 64.8692 3.4500e- 0.0000 64.9553 004 004 004 003 Page 29 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0687 1.1761 0.9908 1.4800e- 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0000 126.9207 126.9207 0.0304 0.0000 127.6797 003 Total 0.0687 1.1761 0.9908 1.4800e- 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0000 126.9207 126.9207 0.0304 0.0000 127.6797 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 4.1100e- 0.1388 0.0371 3.8000e- 9.4900e- 2.7000e- 9.7600e- 2.7400e- 2.6000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 37.0319 37.0319 2.6900e- 0.0000 37.0991 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0136 9.3300e- 0.0957 3.1000e- 0.0331 2.3000e- 0.0333 8.7900e- 2.1000e- 9.0000e- 0.0000 27.8373 27.8373 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.8562 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0177 0.1481 0.1328 6.9000e- 0.0426 5.0000e- 0.0431 0.0115 4.7000e- 0.0120 0.0000 64.8692 64.8692 3.4500e- 0.0000 64.9553 004 004 004 003 Page 30 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.6 12kv Underground - Demo - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 5.2000e- 4.7200e- 5.0200e- 1.0000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.4000e- 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.6565 0.6565 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.6612 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 5.2000e- 4.7200e- 5.0200e- 1.0000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.4000e- 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.6565 0.6565 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.6612 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Page 31 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 4.4000e- 6.9400e- 5.1900e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.6565 0.6565 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.6612 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 4.4000e- 6.9400e- 5.1900e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.6565 0.6565 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.6612 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Page 32 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.7 Parking Structure - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1458 1.3352 1.2734 2.0600e- 0.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 177.6215 177.6215 0.0428 0.0000 178.6913 003 Total 0.1458 1.3352 1.2734 2.0600e- 0.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 177.6215 177.6215 0.0428 0.0000 178.6913 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 5.7100e- 0.1899 0.0507 5.0000e- 0.0123 4.0000e- 0.0127 3.5400e- 3.8000e- 3.9300e- 0.0000 48.3141 48.3141 3.5900e- 0.0000 48.4038 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0163 0.0117 0.1173 3.6000e- 0.0377 2.7000e- 0.0379 0.0100 2.5000e- 0.0103 0.0000 32.9036 32.9036 9.4000e- 0.0000 32.9271 004 004 004 004 Total 0.0220 0.2016 0.1680 8.6000e- 0.0499 6.7000e- 0.0506 0.0136 6.3000e- 0.0142 0.0000 81.2177 81.2177 4.5300e- 0.0000 81.3309 004 004 004 003 Page 33 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0982 1.6500 1.3889 2.0600e- 0.0673 0.0673 0.0673 0.0673 0.0000 177.6213 177.6213 0.0428 0.0000 178.6911 003 Total 0.0982 1.6500 1.3889 2.0600e- 0.0673 0.0673 0.0673 0.0673 0.0000 177.6213 177.6213 0.0428 0.0000 178.6911 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 5.7100e- 0.1899 0.0507 5.0000e- 0.0123 4.0000e- 0.0127 3.5400e- 3.8000e- 3.9300e- 0.0000 48.3141 48.3141 3.5900e- 0.0000 48.4038 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0163 0.0117 0.1173 3.6000e- 0.0377 2.7000e- 0.0379 0.0100 2.5000e- 0.0103 0.0000 32.9036 32.9036 9.4000e- 0.0000 32.9271 004 004 004 004 Total 0.0220 0.2016 0.1680 8.6000e- 0.0499 6.7000e- 0.0506 0.0136 6.3000e- 0.0142 0.0000 81.2177 81.2177 4.5300e- 0.0000 81.3309 004 004 004 003 Page 34 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.8 Internal Storm Drain, Sewer and Water - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0373 0.3548 0.4696 7.0000e- 0.0198 0.0198 0.0182 0.0182 0.0000 61.3147 61.3147 0.0198 0.0000 61.8104 004 Total 0.0373 0.3548 0.4696 7.0000e- 0.0198 0.0198 0.0182 0.0182 0.0000 61.3147 61.3147 0.0198 0.0000 61.8104 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.5000e- 3.2000e- 3.2200e- 1.0000e- 1.0300e- 1.0000e- 1.0400e- 2.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.9037 0.9037 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.9043 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 4.5000e- 3.2000e- 3.2200e- 1.0000e- 1.0300e- 1.0000e- 1.0400e- 2.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.9037 0.9037 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.9043 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Page 35 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0226 0.4525 0.5292 7.0000e- 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0000 61.3146 61.3146 0.0198 0.0000 61.8103 004 Total 0.0226 0.4525 0.5292 7.0000e- 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0200 0.0000 61.3146 61.3146 0.0198 0.0000 61.8103 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.5000e- 3.2000e- 3.2200e- 1.0000e- 1.0300e- 1.0000e- 1.0400e- 2.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.9037 0.9037 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.9043 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 4.5000e- 3.2000e- 3.2200e- 1.0000e- 1.0300e- 1.0000e- 1.0400e- 2.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.9037 0.9037 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.9043 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Page 36 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.9 RGSA - 3 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.6500e- 0.0000 8.6500e- 9.4000e- 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 6.6000e- 5.9400e- 8.4600e- 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 1.1333 1.1333 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.1425 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 6.6000e- 5.9400e- 8.4600e- 1.0000e- 8.6500e- 3.0000e- 8.9500e- 9.4000e- 2.8000e- 1.2200e- 0.0000 1.1333 1.1333 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.1425 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0876 0.0876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0876 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.0000e- 0.0196 5.1400e- 6.0000e- 1.3800e- 6.0000e- 1.4400e- 3.8000e- 6.0000e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 5.7997 5.7997 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.8127 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 37 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.3700e- 0.0000 3.3700e- 3.7000e- 0.0000 3.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 3.2000e- 6.1400e- 9.7900e- 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 1.1333 1.1333 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.1425 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 3.2000e- 6.1400e- 9.7900e- 1.0000e- 3.3700e- 3.0000e- 3.6700e- 3.7000e- 3.0000e- 6.7000e- 0.0000 1.1333 1.1333 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.1425 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0876 0.0876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0876 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.0000e- 0.0196 5.1400e- 6.0000e- 1.3800e- 6.0000e- 1.4400e- 3.8000e- 6.0000e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 5.7997 5.7997 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.8127 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 38 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.10 12kV Underground - Trenching - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0614 0.5862 0.7339 1.0600e- 0.0342 0.0342 0.0314 0.0314 0.0000 93.1848 93.1848 0.0301 0.0000 93.9382 003 Total 0.0614 0.5862 0.7339 1.0600e- 0.0342 0.0342 0.0314 0.0314 0.0000 93.1848 93.1848 0.0301 0.0000 93.9382 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.7000e- 1.9200e- 0.0194 6.0000e- 6.2200e- 4.0000e- 6.2700e- 1.6500e- 4.0000e- 1.6900e- 0.0000 5.4361 5.4361 1.6000e- 0.0000 5.4400 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.7000e- 1.9200e- 0.0194 6.0000e- 6.2200e- 4.0000e- 6.2700e- 1.6500e- 4.0000e- 1.6900e- 0.0000 5.4361 5.4361 1.6000e- 0.0000 5.4400 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Page 39 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0384 0.7764 0.8041 1.0600e- 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0000 93.1847 93.1847 0.0301 0.0000 93.9381 003 Total 0.0384 0.7764 0.8041 1.0600e- 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0000 93.1847 93.1847 0.0301 0.0000 93.9381 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.7000e- 1.9200e- 0.0194 6.0000e- 6.2200e- 4.0000e- 6.2700e- 1.6500e- 4.0000e- 1.6900e- 0.0000 5.4361 5.4361 1.6000e- 0.0000 5.4400 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.7000e- 1.9200e- 0.0194 6.0000e- 6.2200e- 4.0000e- 6.2700e- 1.6500e- 4.0000e- 1.6900e- 0.0000 5.4361 5.4361 1.6000e- 0.0000 5.4400 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Page 40 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.11 RGSA - 4 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.7900e- 0.0000 8.7900e- 9.6000e- 0.0000 9.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7900e- 0.0000 8.7900e- 9.6000e- 0.0000 9.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Page 41 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.4300e- 0.0000 3.4300e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.4300e- 0.0000 3.4300e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Page 42 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.12 RGSA - 5 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.7900e- 0.0000 8.7900e- 9.6000e- 0.0000 9.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 0.0247 0.2843 0.1860 4.0000e- 0.0111 0.0111 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 35.3672 35.3672 0.0114 0.0000 35.6532 004 Total 0.0247 0.2843 0.1860 4.0000e- 8.7900e- 0.0111 0.0199 9.6000e- 0.0102 0.0111 0.0000 35.3672 35.3672 0.0114 0.0000 35.6532 004 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.3000e- 1.7000e- 1.6900e- 1.0000e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.4729 0.4729 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4732 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 1.2400e- 0.0354 0.0104 1.1000e- 2.8500e- 1.1000e- 2.9700e- 7.7000e- 1.0000e- 8.9000e- 0.0000 10.7547 10.7547 9.4000e- 0.0000 10.7783 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Page 43 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.4300e- 0.0000 3.4300e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 9.9000e- 0.1914 0.2145 4.0000e- 7.2600e- 7.2600e- 7.2600e- 7.2600e- 0.0000 35.3671 35.3671 0.0114 0.0000 35.6531 003 004 003 003 003 003 Total 9.9000e- 0.1914 0.2145 4.0000e- 3.4300e- 7.2600e- 0.0107 3.8000e- 7.2600e- 7.6400e- 0.0000 35.3671 35.3671 0.0114 0.0000 35.6531 003 004 003 003 004 003 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 1.0100e- 0.0353 8.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.3100e- 1.1000e- 2.4200e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 7.4000e- 0.0000 10.2819 10.2819 9.3000e- 0.0000 10.3051 003 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.3000e- 1.7000e- 1.6900e- 1.0000e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.4729 0.4729 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4732 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 1.2400e- 0.0354 0.0104 1.1000e- 2.8500e- 1.1000e- 2.9700e- 7.7000e- 1.0000e- 8.9000e- 0.0000 10.7547 10.7547 9.4000e- 0.0000 10.7783 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Page 44 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.13 RGSA - 6 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.6500e- 0.0000 8.6500e- 9.4000e- 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 3.1800e- 0.0305 0.0224 3.0000e- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.5600e- 1.5600e- 0.0000 2.7311 2.7311 8.8000e- 0.0000 2.7531 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 3.1800e- 0.0305 0.0224 3.0000e- 8.6500e- 1.7000e- 0.0104 9.4000e- 1.5600e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 2.7311 2.7311 8.8000e- 0.0000 2.7531 003 005 003 003 004 003 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0876 0.0876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0876 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.0000e- 0.0196 5.1400e- 6.0000e- 1.3800e- 6.0000e- 1.4400e- 3.8000e- 6.0000e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 5.7997 5.7997 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.8127 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 45 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.3700e- 0.0000 3.3700e- 3.7000e- 0.0000 3.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 7.5000e- 0.0146 0.0233 3.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 0.0000 2.7311 2.7311 8.8000e- 0.0000 2.7531 004 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 7.5000e- 0.0146 0.0233 3.0000e- 3.3700e- 7.0000e- 4.0700e- 3.7000e- 7.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 2.7311 2.7311 8.8000e- 0.0000 2.7531 004 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0876 0.0876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0876 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 6.0000e- 0.0196 5.1400e- 6.0000e- 1.3800e- 6.0000e- 1.4400e- 3.8000e- 6.0000e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 5.7997 5.7997 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.8127 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 46 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.14 RGSA - 7 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.6500e- 0.0000 8.6500e- 9.4000e- 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 4.7000e- 4.8100e- 4.7000e- 1.0000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.0000 0.5763 0.5763 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.5809 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 4.7000e- 4.8100e- 4.7000e- 1.0000e- 8.6500e- 2.9000e- 8.9400e- 9.4000e- 2.7000e- 1.2100e- 0.0000 0.5763 0.5763 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.5809 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0525 0.0525 0.0000 0.0000 0.0526 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 5.9000e- 0.0196 5.0200e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 6.0000e- 1.4000e- 3.7000e- 6.0000e- 4.3000e- 0.0000 5.7647 5.7647 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7776 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 47 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.3700e- 0.0000 3.3700e- 3.7000e- 0.0000 3.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 3.1000e- 6.3700e- 4.9600e- 1.0000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 2.6000e- 0.0000 0.5763 0.5763 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.5809 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 3.1000e- 6.3700e- 4.9600e- 1.0000e- 3.3700e- 2.6000e- 3.6300e- 3.7000e- 2.6000e- 6.3000e- 0.0000 0.5763 0.5763 1.9000e- 0.0000 0.5809 004 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 5.6000e- 0.0196 4.8300e- 6.0000e- 1.2800e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 3.5000e- 6.0000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 5.7122 5.7122 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7251 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0525 0.0525 0.0000 0.0000 0.0526 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 5.9000e- 0.0196 5.0200e- 6.0000e- 1.3400e- 6.0000e- 1.4000e- 3.7000e- 6.0000e- 4.3000e- 0.0000 5.7647 5.7647 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.7776 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 48 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.15 RGSA - 8 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.7500e- 0.0000 8.7500e- 9.6000e- 0.0000 9.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 8.9000e- 0.0119 0.0164 2.0000e- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.4000e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 2.1459 2.1459 6.9000e- 0.0000 2.1632 004 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 8.9000e- 0.0119 0.0164 2.0000e- 8.7500e- 4.8000e- 9.2300e- 9.6000e- 4.4000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 2.1459 2.1459 6.9000e- 0.0000 2.1632 004 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 9.0000e- 0.0313 7.7300e- 9.0000e- 2.0500e- 9.0000e- 2.1500e- 5.6000e- 9.0000e- 6.5000e- 0.0000 9.1395 9.1395 8.2000e- 0.0000 9.1601 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.1000e- 8.0000e- 8.0000e- 0.0000 2.6000e- 0.0000 2.6000e- 7.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000e- 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.2243 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 1.0100e- 0.0314 8.5300e- 9.0000e- 2.3100e- 9.0000e- 2.4100e- 6.3000e- 9.0000e- 7.2000e- 0.0000 9.3636 9.3636 8.3000e- 0.0000 9.3844 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 49 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.4100e- 0.0000 3.4100e- 3.7000e- 0.0000 3.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 1.1500e- 0.0238 0.0185 2.0000e- 9.6000e- 9.6000e- 9.6000e- 9.6000e- 0.0000 2.1459 2.1459 6.9000e- 0.0000 2.1632 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 1.1500e- 0.0238 0.0185 2.0000e- 3.4100e- 9.6000e- 4.3700e- 3.7000e- 9.6000e- 1.3300e- 0.0000 2.1459 2.1459 6.9000e- 0.0000 2.1632 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 003 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 9.0000e- 0.0313 7.7300e- 9.0000e- 2.0500e- 9.0000e- 2.1500e- 5.6000e- 9.0000e- 6.5000e- 0.0000 9.1395 9.1395 8.2000e- 0.0000 9.1601 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.1000e- 8.0000e- 8.0000e- 0.0000 2.6000e- 0.0000 2.6000e- 7.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000e- 0.0000 0.2242 0.2242 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.2243 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 1.0100e- 0.0314 8.5300e- 9.0000e- 2.3100e- 9.0000e- 2.4100e- 6.3000e- 9.0000e- 7.2000e- 0.0000 9.3636 9.3636 8.3000e- 0.0000 9.3844 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 50 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.16 Hotel Structure 2 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1657 1.5173 1.4470 2.3500e- 0.0836 0.0836 0.0786 0.0786 0.0000 201.8426 201.8426 0.0486 0.0000 203.0583 003 Total 0.1657 1.5173 1.4470 2.3500e- 0.0836 0.0836 0.0786 0.0786 0.0000 201.8426 201.8426 0.0486 0.0000 203.0583 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 3.2500e- 0.1079 0.0288 2.8000e- 6.9700e- 2.3000e- 7.2000e- 2.0100e- 2.2000e- 2.2300e- 0.0000 27.4512 27.4512 2.0400e- 0.0000 27.5021 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 9.1200e- 6.5100e- 0.0656 2.0000e- 0.0211 1.5000e- 0.0212 5.5900e- 1.4000e- 5.7300e- 0.0000 18.3887 18.3887 5.3000e- 0.0000 18.4019 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0124 0.1144 0.0944 4.8000e- 0.0280 3.8000e- 0.0284 7.6000e- 3.6000e- 7.9600e- 0.0000 45.8399 45.8399 2.5700e- 0.0000 45.9040 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 51 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1116 1.8751 1.5783 2.3500e- 0.0764 0.0764 0.0764 0.0764 0.0000 201.8424 201.8424 0.0486 0.0000 203.0581 003 Total 0.1116 1.8751 1.5783 2.3500e- 0.0764 0.0764 0.0764 0.0764 0.0000 201.8424 201.8424 0.0486 0.0000 203.0581 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 3.2500e- 0.1079 0.0288 2.8000e- 6.9700e- 2.3000e- 7.2000e- 2.0100e- 2.2000e- 2.2300e- 0.0000 27.4512 27.4512 2.0400e- 0.0000 27.5021 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 9.1200e- 6.5100e- 0.0656 2.0000e- 0.0211 1.5000e- 0.0212 5.5900e- 1.4000e- 5.7300e- 0.0000 18.3887 18.3887 5.3000e- 0.0000 18.4019 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0124 0.1144 0.0944 4.8000e- 0.0280 3.8000e- 0.0284 7.6000e- 3.6000e- 7.9600e- 0.0000 45.8399 45.8399 2.5700e- 0.0000 45.9040 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 52 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.16 Hotel Structure 2 - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0935 0.8545 0.8980 1.4800e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0417 0.0417 0.0000 126.9208 126.9208 0.0304 0.0000 127.6799 003 Total 0.0935 0.8545 0.8980 1.4800e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0417 0.0417 0.0000 126.9208 126.9208 0.0304 0.0000 127.6799 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 1.9000e- 0.0641 0.0171 1.7000e- 4.3800e- 1.2000e- 4.5000e- 1.2600e- 1.2000e- 1.3800e- 0.0000 17.0916 17.0916 1.2400e- 0.0000 17.1227 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 5.4300e- 3.7300e- 0.0383 1.2000e- 0.0132 9.0000e- 0.0133 3.5200e- 8.0000e- 3.6000e- 0.0000 11.1349 11.1349 3.0000e- 0.0000 11.1425 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 7.3300e- 0.0678 0.0554 2.9000e- 0.0176 2.1000e- 0.0178 4.7800e- 2.0000e- 4.9800e- 0.0000 28.2266 28.2266 1.5400e- 0.0000 28.2652 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 53 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0687 1.1761 0.9908 1.4800e- 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0000 126.9207 126.9207 0.0304 0.0000 127.6797 003 Total 0.0687 1.1761 0.9908 1.4800e- 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0475 0.0000 126.9207 126.9207 0.0304 0.0000 127.6797 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 1.9000e- 0.0641 0.0171 1.7000e- 4.3800e- 1.2000e- 4.5000e- 1.2600e- 1.2000e- 1.3800e- 0.0000 17.0916 17.0916 1.2400e- 0.0000 17.1227 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 5.4300e- 3.7300e- 0.0383 1.2000e- 0.0132 9.0000e- 0.0133 3.5200e- 8.0000e- 3.6000e- 0.0000 11.1349 11.1349 3.0000e- 0.0000 11.1425 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 7.3300e- 0.0678 0.0554 2.9000e- 0.0176 2.1000e- 0.0178 4.7800e- 2.0000e- 4.9800e- 0.0000 28.2266 28.2266 1.5400e- 0.0000 28.2652 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 54 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.17 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Demo - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 8.7700e- 0.0000 8.7700e- 1.3300e- 0.0000 1.3300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 003 Off-Road 2.0200e- 0.0192 0.0215 3.0000e- 1.0800e- 1.0800e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 2.7055 2.7055 8.2000e- 0.0000 2.7261 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 2.0200e- 0.0192 0.0215 3.0000e- 8.7700e- 1.0800e- 9.8500e- 1.3300e- 1.0000e- 2.3300e- 0.0000 2.7055 2.7055 8.2000e- 0.0000 2.7261 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 4.5000e- 0.0157 3.8700e- 5.0000e- 1.0300e- 5.0000e- 1.0700e- 2.8000e- 5.0000e- 3.3000e- 0.0000 4.5697 4.5697 4.1000e- 0.0000 4.5800 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 8.0000e- 6.0000e- 5.6000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 5.0000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.1576 0.1576 0.0000 0.0000 0.1577 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 5.3000e- 0.0157 4.4300e- 5.0000e- 1.2100e- 5.0000e- 1.2500e- 3.3000e- 5.0000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 4.7274 4.7274 4.1000e- 0.0000 4.7378 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 55 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 3.4200e- 0.0000 3.4200e- 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.2000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 1.6400e- 0.0292 0.0222 3.0000e- 1.1700e- 1.1700e- 1.1700e- 1.1700e- 0.0000 2.7055 2.7055 8.2000e- 0.0000 2.7261 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 1.6400e- 0.0292 0.0222 3.0000e- 3.4200e- 1.1700e- 4.5900e- 5.2000e- 1.1700e- 1.6900e- 0.0000 2.7055 2.7055 8.2000e- 0.0000 2.7261 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 4.5000e- 0.0157 3.8700e- 5.0000e- 1.0300e- 5.0000e- 1.0700e- 2.8000e- 5.0000e- 3.3000e- 0.0000 4.5697 4.5697 4.1000e- 0.0000 4.5800 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 8.0000e- 6.0000e- 5.6000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 5.0000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.1576 0.1576 0.0000 0.0000 0.1577 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 5.3000e- 0.0157 4.4300e- 5.0000e- 1.2100e- 5.0000e- 1.2500e- 3.3000e- 5.0000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 4.7274 4.7274 4.1000e- 0.0000 4.7378 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Page 56 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.18 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - curb - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 6.7000e- 0.0000 6.7000e- 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 004 005 005 Off-Road 7.5000e- 7.5800e- 9.0400e- 1.0000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 4.1000e- 4.1000e- 0.0000 1.0919 1.0919 3.5000e- 0.0000 1.1007 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 7.5000e- 7.5800e- 9.0400e- 1.0000e- 6.7000e- 4.5000e- 1.1200e- 8.0000e- 4.1000e- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.0919 1.0919 3.5000e- 0.0000 1.1007 004 003 003 005 004 004 003 005 004 004 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Page 57 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 2.6000e- 0.0000 2.6000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 004 005 005 Off-Road 5.8000e- 0.0120 9.3700e- 1.0000e- 4.9000e- 4.9000e- 4.9000e- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.0919 1.0919 3.5000e- 0.0000 1.1007 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 5.8000e- 0.0120 9.3700e- 1.0000e- 2.6000e- 4.9000e- 7.5000e- 3.0000e- 4.9000e- 5.2000e- 0.0000 1.0919 1.0919 3.5000e- 0.0000 1.1007 004 003 005 004 004 004 005 004 004 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 0.0000 8.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0701 0.0701 0.0000 0.0000 0.0701 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Page 58 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.19 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - sidewalk - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 1.7400e- 0.0000 1.7400e- 2.4000e- 0.0000 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off-Road 0.0371 0.3668 0.3391 4.8000e- 0.0201 0.0201 0.0185 0.0185 0.0000 42.5594 42.5594 0.0138 0.0000 42.9035 004 Total 0.0371 0.3668 0.3391 4.8000e- 1.7400e- 0.0201 0.0218 2.4000e- 0.0185 0.0187 0.0000 42.5594 42.5594 0.0138 0.0000 42.9035 004 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 4.0600e- 0.1410 0.0348 4.1000e- 9.2400e- 4.3000e- 9.6700e- 2.5400e- 4.1000e- 2.9500e- 0.0000 41.1275 41.1275 3.7100e- 0.0000 41.2203 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.2500e- 8.9000e- 8.9900e- 3.0000e- 2.8900e- 2.0000e- 2.9100e- 7.7000e- 2.0000e- 7.9000e- 0.0000 2.5219 2.5219 7.0000e- 0.0000 2.5237 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 5.3100e- 0.1419 0.0438 4.4000e- 0.0121 4.5000e- 0.0126 3.3100e- 4.3000e- 3.7400e- 0.0000 43.6494 43.6494 3.7800e- 0.0000 43.7440 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 59 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 6.8000e- 0.0000 6.8000e- 9.0000e- 0.0000 9.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 004 005 005 Off-Road 0.0156 0.3124 0.3651 4.8000e- 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 42.5594 42.5594 0.0138 0.0000 42.9035 004 Total 0.0156 0.3124 0.3651 4.8000e- 6.8000e- 0.0138 0.0145 9.0000e- 0.0138 0.0139 0.0000 42.5594 42.5594 0.0138 0.0000 42.9035 004 004 005

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 4.0600e- 0.1410 0.0348 4.1000e- 9.2400e- 4.3000e- 9.6700e- 2.5400e- 4.1000e- 2.9500e- 0.0000 41.1275 41.1275 3.7100e- 0.0000 41.2203 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.2500e- 8.9000e- 8.9900e- 3.0000e- 2.8900e- 2.0000e- 2.9100e- 7.7000e- 2.0000e- 7.9000e- 0.0000 2.5219 2.5219 7.0000e- 0.0000 2.5237 003 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 5.3100e- 0.1419 0.0438 4.4000e- 0.0121 4.5000e- 0.0126 3.3100e- 4.3000e- 3.7400e- 0.0000 43.6494 43.6494 3.7800e- 0.0000 43.7440 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 60 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.20 Dry Utilities - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0108 0.1030 0.1379 2.1000e- 5.6700e- 5.6700e- 5.2200e- 5.2200e- 0.0000 18.0981 18.0981 5.8500e- 0.0000 18.2445 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0108 0.1030 0.1379 2.1000e- 5.6700e- 5.6700e- 5.2200e- 5.2200e- 0.0000 18.0981 18.0981 5.8500e- 0.0000 18.2445 004 003 003 003 003 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.0000e- 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4028 0.4028 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4031 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.0000e- 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4028 0.4028 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4031 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Page 61 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 6.5300e- 0.1302 0.1562 2.1000e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 0.0000 18.0981 18.0981 5.8500e- 0.0000 18.2445 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 6.5300e- 0.1302 0.1562 2.1000e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 5.7900e- 0.0000 18.0981 18.0981 5.8500e- 0.0000 18.2445 003 004 003 003 003 003 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.0000e- 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4028 0.4028 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4031 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.0000e- 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 0.0000 4.6000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4028 0.4028 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4031 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Page 62 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.21 Hotel Structure 3 - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1041 0.9537 0.9096 1.4700e- 0.0525 0.0525 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 126.8725 126.8725 0.0306 0.0000 127.6366 003 Total 0.1041 0.9537 0.9096 1.4700e- 0.0525 0.0525 0.0494 0.0494 0.0000 126.8725 126.8725 0.0306 0.0000 127.6366 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 2.3800e- 0.0791 0.0211 2.1000e- 5.1100e- 1.7000e- 5.2800e- 1.4800e- 1.6000e- 1.6400e- 0.0000 20.1309 20.1309 1.4900e- 0.0000 20.1682 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 6.6900e- 4.7700e- 0.0481 1.5000e- 0.0154 1.1000e- 0.0156 4.1000e- 1.0000e- 4.2000e- 0.0000 13.4851 13.4851 3.9000e- 0.0000 13.4947 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 9.0700e- 0.0839 0.0692 3.6000e- 0.0206 2.8000e- 0.0208 5.5800e- 2.6000e- 5.8400e- 0.0000 33.6159 33.6159 1.8800e- 0.0000 33.6630 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 63 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0701 1.1786 0.9921 1.4700e- 0.0480 0.0480 0.0480 0.0480 0.0000 126.8724 126.8724 0.0306 0.0000 127.6365 003 Total 0.0701 1.1786 0.9921 1.4700e- 0.0480 0.0480 0.0480 0.0480 0.0000 126.8724 126.8724 0.0306 0.0000 127.6365 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 2.3800e- 0.0791 0.0211 2.1000e- 5.1100e- 1.7000e- 5.2800e- 1.4800e- 1.6000e- 1.6400e- 0.0000 20.1309 20.1309 1.4900e- 0.0000 20.1682 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 6.6900e- 4.7700e- 0.0481 1.5000e- 0.0154 1.1000e- 0.0156 4.1000e- 1.0000e- 4.2000e- 0.0000 13.4851 13.4851 3.9000e- 0.0000 13.4947 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 9.0700e- 0.0839 0.0692 3.6000e- 0.0206 2.8000e- 0.0208 5.5800e- 2.6000e- 5.8400e- 0.0000 33.6159 33.6159 1.8800e- 0.0000 33.6630 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 64 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.21 Hotel Structure 3 - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1487 1.3594 1.4287 2.3500e- 0.0705 0.0705 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 201.9195 201.9195 0.0483 0.0000 203.1270 003 Total 0.1487 1.3594 1.4287 2.3500e- 0.0705 0.0705 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 201.9195 201.9195 0.0483 0.0000 203.1270 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 3.5200e- 0.1189 0.0318 3.2000e- 8.1300e- 2.3000e- 8.3600e- 2.3500e- 2.2000e- 2.5700e- 0.0000 31.7231 31.7231 2.3000e- 0.0000 31.7807 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0101 6.9200e- 0.0710 2.3000e- 0.0246 1.7000e- 0.0247 6.5300e- 1.6000e- 6.6800e- 0.0000 20.6671 20.6671 5.6000e- 0.0000 20.6812 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0136 0.1258 0.1028 5.5000e- 0.0327 4.0000e- 0.0331 8.8800e- 3.8000e- 9.2500e- 0.0000 52.3902 52.3902 2.8600e- 0.0000 52.4618 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 65 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.1093 1.8710 1.5763 2.3500e- 0.0755 0.0755 0.0755 0.0755 0.0000 201.9192 201.9192 0.0483 0.0000 203.1268 003 Total 0.1093 1.8710 1.5763 2.3500e- 0.0755 0.0755 0.0755 0.0755 0.0000 201.9192 201.9192 0.0483 0.0000 203.1268 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 3.5200e- 0.1189 0.0318 3.2000e- 8.1300e- 2.3000e- 8.3600e- 2.3500e- 2.2000e- 2.5700e- 0.0000 31.7231 31.7231 2.3000e- 0.0000 31.7807 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Worker 0.0101 6.9200e- 0.0710 2.3000e- 0.0246 1.7000e- 0.0247 6.5300e- 1.6000e- 6.6800e- 0.0000 20.6671 20.6671 5.6000e- 0.0000 20.6812 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0136 0.1258 0.1028 5.5000e- 0.0327 4.0000e- 0.0331 8.8800e- 3.8000e- 9.2500e- 0.0000 52.3902 52.3902 2.8600e- 0.0000 52.4618 004 004 003 004 003 003 Page 66 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.22 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0687 0.6505 0.7378 1.1500e- 0.0348 0.0348 0.0323 0.0323 0.0000 97.8909 97.8909 0.0296 0.0000 98.6318 003 Paving 5.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 Total 0.0693 0.6505 0.7378 1.1500e- 0.0348 0.0348 0.0323 0.0323 0.0000 97.8909 97.8909 0.0296 0.0000 98.6318 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.4300e- 3.1600e- 0.0318 1.0000e- 0.0102 7.0000e- 0.0103 2.7100e- 7.0000e- 2.7800e- 0.0000 8.9177 8.9177 2.6000e- 0.0000 8.9240 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 4.4300e- 3.1600e- 0.0318 1.0000e- 0.0102 7.0000e- 0.0103 2.7100e- 7.0000e- 2.7800e- 0.0000 8.9177 8.9177 2.6000e- 0.0000 8.9240 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Page 67 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0550 0.9926 0.8275 1.1500e- 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0000 97.8908 97.8908 0.0296 0.0000 98.6317 003 Paving 5.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 Total 0.0555 0.9926 0.8275 1.1500e- 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0000 97.8908 97.8908 0.0296 0.0000 98.6317 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.4300e- 3.1600e- 0.0318 1.0000e- 0.0102 7.0000e- 0.0103 2.7100e- 7.0000e- 2.7800e- 0.0000 8.9177 8.9177 2.6000e- 0.0000 8.9240 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 4.4300e- 3.1600e- 0.0318 1.0000e- 0.0102 7.0000e- 0.0103 2.7100e- 7.0000e- 2.7800e- 0.0000 8.9177 8.9177 2.6000e- 0.0000 8.9240 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Page 68 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.23 Off-site (Jefferson & Ring) - Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0232 0.2199 0.2469 3.8000e- 0.0120 0.0120 0.0111 0.0111 0.0000 32.2169 32.2169 9.7400e- 0.0000 32.4603 004 003 Paving 5.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 Total 0.0238 0.2199 0.2469 3.8000e- 0.0120 0.0120 0.0111 0.0111 0.0000 32.2169 32.2169 9.7400e- 0.0000 32.4603 004 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.4800e- 1.0500e- 0.0106 3.0000e- 3.4100e- 2.0000e- 3.4300e- 9.1000e- 2.0000e- 9.3000e- 0.0000 2.9772 2.9772 9.0000e- 0.0000 2.9794 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.4800e- 1.0500e- 0.0106 3.0000e- 3.4100e- 2.0000e- 3.4300e- 9.1000e- 2.0000e- 9.3000e- 0.0000 2.9772 2.9772 9.0000e- 0.0000 2.9794 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Page 69 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.0185 0.3309 0.2719 3.8000e- 0.0122 0.0122 0.0122 0.0122 0.0000 32.2168 32.2168 9.7400e- 0.0000 32.4602 004 003 Paving 5.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 Total 0.0190 0.3309 0.2719 3.8000e- 0.0122 0.0122 0.0122 0.0122 0.0000 32.2168 32.2168 9.7400e- 0.0000 32.4602 004 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.4800e- 1.0500e- 0.0106 3.0000e- 3.4100e- 2.0000e- 3.4300e- 9.1000e- 2.0000e- 9.3000e- 0.0000 2.9772 2.9772 9.0000e- 0.0000 2.9794 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.4800e- 1.0500e- 0.0106 3.0000e- 3.4100e- 2.0000e- 3.4300e- 9.1000e- 2.0000e- 9.3000e- 0.0000 2.9772 2.9772 9.0000e- 0.0000 2.9794 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Page 70 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.24 Precise Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.2102 0.0000 0.2102 0.1118 0.0000 0.1118 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.1261 1.2874 1.1757 2.0700e- 0.0579 0.0579 0.0532 0.0532 0.0000 181.8806 181.8806 0.0588 0.0000 183.3512 003 Total 0.1261 1.2874 1.1757 2.0700e- 0.2102 0.0579 0.2681 0.1118 0.0532 0.1651 0.0000 181.8806 181.8806 0.0588 0.0000 183.3512 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.2000e- 1.5100e- 0.0155 5.0000e- 5.3700e- 4.0000e- 5.4100e- 1.4300e- 3.0000e- 1.4600e- 0.0000 4.5215 4.5215 1.2000e- 0.0000 4.5245 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.2000e- 1.5100e- 0.0155 5.0000e- 5.3700e- 4.0000e- 5.4100e- 1.4300e- 3.0000e- 1.4600e- 0.0000 4.5215 4.5215 1.2000e- 0.0000 4.5245 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Page 71 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.0820 0.0000 0.0820 0.0436 0.0000 0.0436 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0553 1.0829 1.2711 2.0700e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0000 181.8804 181.8804 0.0588 0.0000 183.3510 003 Total 0.0553 1.0829 1.2711 2.0700e- 0.0820 0.0443 0.1263 0.0436 0.0443 0.0879 0.0000 181.8804 181.8804 0.0588 0.0000 183.3510 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.2000e- 1.5100e- 0.0155 5.0000e- 5.3700e- 4.0000e- 5.4100e- 1.4300e- 3.0000e- 1.4600e- 0.0000 4.5215 4.5215 1.2000e- 0.0000 4.5245 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.2000e- 1.5100e- 0.0155 5.0000e- 5.3700e- 4.0000e- 5.4100e- 1.4300e- 3.0000e- 1.4600e- 0.0000 4.5215 4.5215 1.2000e- 0.0000 4.5245 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Page 72 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.25 Architectural Coating - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 0.7830 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0200 0.1380 0.1777 2.9000e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 0.0000 25.0219 25.0219 1.6300e- 0.0000 25.0626 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.8031 0.1380 0.1777 2.9000e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 8.0100e- 0.0000 25.0219 25.0219 1.6300e- 0.0000 25.0626 004 003 003 003 003 003

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0135 9.3100e- 0.0955 3.1000e- 0.0330 2.3000e- 0.0332 8.7700e- 2.1000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 27.7765 27.7765 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.7955 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0135 9.3100e- 0.0955 3.1000e- 0.0330 2.3000e- 0.0332 8.7700e- 2.1000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 27.7765 27.7765 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.7955 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Page 73 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 0.7830 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0112 0.2305 0.1796 2.9000e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 0.0000 25.0219 25.0219 1.6300e- 0.0000 25.0626 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.7942 0.2305 0.1796 2.9000e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 9.3200e- 0.0000 25.0219 25.0219 1.6300e- 0.0000 25.0626 004 003 003 003 003 003

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0135 9.3100e- 0.0955 3.1000e- 0.0330 2.3000e- 0.0332 8.7700e- 2.1000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 27.7765 27.7765 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.7955 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0135 9.3100e- 0.0955 3.1000e- 0.0330 2.3000e- 0.0332 8.7700e- 2.1000e- 8.9800e- 0.0000 27.7765 27.7765 7.6000e- 0.0000 27.7955 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Page 74 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

3.25 Architectural Coating - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 0.2677 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 6.4200e- 0.0437 0.0607 1.0000e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 5.1000e- 0.0000 8.5662 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 Total 0.2741 0.0437 0.0607 1.0000e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 2.3700e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 5.1000e- 0.0000 8.5662 004 003 003 003 003 004

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.3900e- 2.9000e- 0.0303 1.0000e- 0.0113 8.0000e- 0.0114 3.0000e- 7.0000e- 3.0700e- 0.0000 9.1324 9.1324 2.4000e- 0.0000 9.1383 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 4.3900e- 2.9000e- 0.0303 1.0000e- 0.0113 8.0000e- 0.0114 3.0000e- 7.0000e- 3.0700e- 0.0000 9.1324 9.1324 2.4000e- 0.0000 9.1383 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Page 75 of 75 Inns at BVC Construction Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 0.2677 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.8200e- 0.0788 0.0614 1.0000e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 5.1000e- 0.0000 8.5662 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 Total 0.2715 0.0788 0.0614 1.0000e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 3.1900e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 5.1000e- 0.0000 8.5662 004 003 003 003 003 004

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 4.3900e- 2.9000e- 0.0303 1.0000e- 0.0113 8.0000e- 0.0114 3.0000e- 7.0000e- 3.0700e- 0.0000 9.1324 9.1324 2.4000e- 0.0000 9.1383 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Total 4.3900e- 2.9000e- 0.0303 1.0000e- 0.0113 8.0000e- 0.0114 3.0000e- 7.0000e- 3.0700e- 0.0000 9.1324 9.1324 2.4000e- 0.0000 9.1383 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Page 1 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 11/25/2019 8:07 AM

Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures San Diego County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

General Office Building 4.00 1000sqft 0.09 4,000.00 0

Parking Lot 47.00 Space 0.42 18,800.00 0

Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 432.00 Space 3.89 172,800.00 0

Hotel 426.00 Room 8.10 326,515.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 40

Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2024

Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric

CO2 Intensity 720.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N2O Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - Inns at Buena Vista. San Diego County (San Diego Air Basin). Land Use - Development of 426 room hotel, 479 parking spaces (432 space parking structure, 47 space parking lot), and a 4,000 SF pavilion building on a 12.5 acre site. Construction Phase - Modeling operations only. Trips and VMT - Modeling operations only. Vehicle Trips - Assuming 10 trips per day from Traffic Study. Sat and sun Trips = 1.22 * default value Page 2 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

Woodstoves - No fireplaces Area Coating - Comply with SDCAPCD Rule 67.0.1. Water Mitigation - Default assumed. Off-road Equipment - Modeling operations only.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100

tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50

tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 0 250

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 618,552.00 326,515.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 14.20 8.10

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 7.28

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.00

tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowBathroomFau 32 0 cet tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowKitchenFaucet 18 0 Page 3 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Energy 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 2,532.498 2,532.498 0.0804 0.0313 2,543.838 003 0 0 1 Mobile 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 48.0987 0.0000 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6539 54.9516 58.6054 0.3775 9.3200e- 70.8200 003 Total 2.3822 4.3517 9.9777 0.0373 2.9311 0.0967 3.0278 0.7848 0.0949 0.8797 51.7526 5,521.679 5,573.432 3.4542 0.0406 5,671.892 4 0 9 Page 4 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Energy 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 2,532.498 2,532.498 0.0804 0.0313 2,543.838 003 0 0 1 Mobile 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 48.0987 0.0000 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6539 54.9516 58.6054 0.3775 9.3200e- 70.8200 003 Total 2.3822 4.3517 9.9777 0.0373 2.9311 0.0967 3.0278 0.7848 0.0949 0.8797 51.7526 5,521.679 5,573.432 3.4542 0.0406 5,671.892 4 0 9

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1 Unmitigated 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1 Page 5 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

General Office Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 4,260.00 4,260.00 3101.28 7,779,207 7,779,207 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4,260.00 4,260.00 3,101.28 7,779,207 7,779,207

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00W 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unenclosed Parking with 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Elevator 4.4 Fleet Mix

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Hotel 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Parking Lot 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Unenclosed Parking with 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998 Elevator Page 6 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

5.0 Energy Detail

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,511.144 1,511.144 0.0608 0.0126 1,516.415 Mitigated 5 5 3 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,511.144 1,511.144 0.0608 0.0126 1,516.415 Unmitigated 5 5 3 NaturalGas 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 Mitigated 003 4 4 8 NaturalGas 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 Unmitigated 003 4 4 8

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated

NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

General Office 80760 4.4000e- 3.9600e- 3.3300e- 2.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 4.3097 4.3097 8.0000e- 8.0000e- 4.3353 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 Hotel 1.90587e+ 0.1028 0.9343 0.7848 5.6100e- 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0000 1,017.043 1,017.043 0.0195 0.0187 1,023.087 007 003 8 8 6 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 003 4 4 8 Page 7 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated

Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use

Land Use kWh/yr t MT/yr o n General Office 53760 17.5692 7.1000e- 1.5000e- 17.6305 Building 004 004 Hotel 4.22837e+ 1,381.8681 0.0556 0.0115 1,386.688 006 0 Parking Lot 6580 2.1504 9.0000e- 2.0000e- 2.1579 005 005 Unenclosed 335232 109.5568 4.4100e- 9.1000e- 109.9389 Parking with 003 004 Elevator Total 1,511.1445 0.0608 0.0126 1,516.415 3

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Unmitigated 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Page 8 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural 0.1024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 1.3032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 7.7000e- 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Total 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category t MT/yr o n Mitigated 58.6054 0.3775 9.3200e- 70.8200 003 Unmitigated 58.6054 0.3775 9.3200e- 70.8200 003 Page 9 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated

Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use

Land Use Mgal t MT/yr o n General Office 0.710935 / 4.8329 0.0234 5.9000e- 5.5912 Building 0.435734 004 Hotel 10.8062 / 53.7725 0.3542 8.7300e- 65.2288 1.20069 003 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 58.6054 0.3775 9.3200e- 70.8200 003

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

Category/Year

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

t MT/yr o n Mitigated 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625

Unmitigated 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625 Page 10 of 10 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions Without Regulatory Measures - San Diego County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated

Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed

Land Use tons t MT/yr o n General Office 3.72 0.7551 0.0446 0.0000 1.8708 Building Hotel 233.23 47.3436 2.7979 0.0000 117.2917

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625 Page 1 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 11/25/2019 2:20 PM

Inns at BVC Operation Emissions San Diego County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

General Office Building 4.00 1000sqft 0.09 4,000.00 0

Parking Lot 47.00 Space 0.42 18,800.00 0

Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 432.00 Space 3.89 172,800.00 0

Hotel 426.00 Room 8.10 326,515.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 40

Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2024

Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric

CO2 Intensity 440.3 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N2O Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - Inns at Buena Vista. San Diego County (San Diego Air Basin). Adjusted CO2 intensity factor to meet 45% renewables. Land Use - Development of 426 room hotel, 479 parking spaces (432 space parking structure, 47 space parking lot), and a 4,000 SF pavilion building on a 12.5 acre site. Construction Phase - Modeling operations only. Off-road Equipment - Modeling operations only. Trips and VMT - Modeling operations only. Page 2 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Vehicle Trips - Assuming 10 trips per day from Traffic Study. Sat and sun Trips = 1.22 * default value Woodstoves - No fireplaces Area Coating - Comply with SDCAPCD Rule 67.0.1. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Improve pedestrian network (project site and connecting off-site). Water Mitigation - Water conservation strategy: 20% reduction indoor. 20% reduction outdoor, consistent with CalGreen. Use of low-flow toilets and showers. Use of water-efficient irrigation systems. Waste Mitigation - Percent reduction in waste disposed: 75% diversion rate per Assembly Bill 341.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100

tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 618,552.00 326,515.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 14.20 8.10

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 440.3

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 7.28

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.00

tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowBathroomFau 32 0 cet tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowKitchenFaucet 18 0 Page 3 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Energy 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,944.831 1,944.831 0.0804 0.0313 1,956.171 003 8 8 9 Mobile 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 48.0987 0.0000 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6539 33.5816 37.2354 0.3775 9.3200e- 49.4500 003 Total 2.3822 4.3517 9.9777 0.0373 2.9311 0.0967 3.0278 0.7848 0.0949 0.8797 51.7526 4,912.643 4,964.395 3.4542 0.0406 5,062.856 2 8 8

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Energy 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,944.831 1,944.831 0.0804 0.0313 1,956.171 003 8 8 9 Mobile 0.8668 3.3838 9.0522 0.0311 2.8725 0.0249 2.8974 0.7691 0.0232 0.7923 0.0000 2,880.668 2,880.668 0.1514 0.0000 2,884.451 0 0 7 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.0247 0.0000 12.0247 0.7106 0.0000 29.7906

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9231 26.8652 29.7883 0.3020 7.4600e- 39.5600 003 Page 4 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Total 2.3764 4.3220 9.8486 0.0368 2.8725 0.0962 2.9687 0.7691 0.0945 0.8636 14.9478 4,852.381 4,867.329 1.2444 0.0388 4,909.991 3 1 5

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Percent 0.25 0.68 1.29 1.55 2.00 0.44 1.95 2.00 0.42 1.83 71.12 1.23 1.96 63.97 4.58 3.02 Reduction

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

Improve Pedestrian Network

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 0.8668 3.3838 9.0522 0.0311 2.8725 0.0249 2.8974 0.7691 0.0232 0.7923 0.0000 2,880.668 2,880.668 0.1514 0.0000 2,884.451 0 0 7 Unmitigated 0.8726 3.4134 9.1812 0.0317 2.9311 0.0253 2.9565 0.7848 0.0236 0.8084 0.0000 2,934.213 2,934.213 0.1537 0.0000 2,938.055 6 6 1

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

General Office Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 4,260.00 4,260.00 3101.28 7,779,207 7,623,623 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4,260.00 4,260.00 3,101.28 7,779,207 7,623,623 Page 5 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00W 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unenclosed Parking with 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Elevator 4.4 Fleet Mix

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Hotel 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Parking Lot 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998

Unenclosed Parking with 0.606234 0.039465 0.179154 0.102641 0.014368 0.005395 0.016820 0.024508 0.001929 0.001857 0.005869 0.000761 0.000998 Elevator

5.0 Energy Detail

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 923.4784 923.4784 0.0608 0.0126 928.7491 Mitigated Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 923.4784 923.4784 0.0608 0.0126 928.7491 Unmitigated NaturalGas 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 Mitigated 003 4 4 8 NaturalGas 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 Unmitigated 003 4 4 8 Page 6 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated

NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

General Office 80760 4.4000e- 3.9600e- 3.3300e- 2.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 4.3097 4.3097 8.0000e- 8.0000e- 4.3353 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 Hotel 1.90587e+ 0.1028 0.9343 0.7848 5.6100e- 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0000 1,017.043 1,017.043 0.0195 0.0187 1,023.087 007 003 8 8 6 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 003 4 4 8

Mitigated

NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

General Office 80760 4.4000e- 3.9600e- 3.3300e- 2.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 4.3097 4.3097 8.0000e- 8.0000e- 4.3353 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 Hotel 1.90587e+ 0.1028 0.9343 0.7848 5.6100e- 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0000 1,017.043 1,017.043 0.0195 0.0187 1,023.087 007 003 8 8 6 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 0.1032 0.9382 0.7881 5.6300e- 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0713 0.0000 1,021.353 1,021.353 0.0196 0.0187 1,027.422 003 4 4 8 Page 7 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated

Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use

Land Use kWh/yr t MT/yr o n General Office 53760 10.7368 7.1000e- 1.5000e- 10.7981 Building 004 004 Hotel 4.22837e+ 844.4760 0.0556 0.0115 849.2959 006 Parking Lot 6580 1.3141 9.0000e- 2.0000e- 1.3216 005 005 Unenclosed 335232 66.9514 4.4100e- 9.1000e- 67.3336 Parking with 003 004 Elevator Total 923.4784 0.0608 0.0126 928.7491

Mitigated

Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use

Land Use kWh/yr t MT/yr o n General Office 53760 10.7368 7.1000e- 1.5000e- 10.7981 Building 004 004 Hotel 4.22837e+ 844.4760 0.0556 0.0115 849.2959 006 Parking Lot 6580 1.3141 9.0000e- 2.0000e- 1.3216 005 005 Unenclosed 335232 66.9514 4.4100e- 9.1000e- 67.3336 Parking with 003 004 Elevator Total 923.4784 0.0608 0.0126 928.7491 Page 8 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Unmitigated 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005

6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural 0.1024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 1.3032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 7.7000e- 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Total 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Page 9 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural 0.1024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 1.3032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 7.7000e- 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Total 1.4064 8.0000e- 8.3400e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0162 0.0162 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0173 005 003 005 005 005 005 005

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

Apply Water Conservation Strategy Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category t MT/yr o n Mitigated 29.7883 0.3020 7.4600e- 39.5600 003 Unmitigated 37.2354 0.3775 9.3200e- 49.4500 003 Page 10 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated

Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use

Land Use Mgal t MT/yr o n General Office 0.710935 / 3.0412 0.0234 5.9000e- 3.7994 Building 0.435734 004 Hotel 10.8062 / 34.1943 0.3542 8.7300e- 45.6506 1.20069 003 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 37.2354 0.3775 9.3200e- 49.4500 003

Mitigated

Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use

Land Use Mgal t MT/yr o n General Office 0.568748 / 2.4329 0.0187 4.7000e- 3.0395 Building 0.348587 004 Hotel 8.645 / 27.3554 0.2833 6.9900e- 36.5205 0.960555 003 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 29.7883 0.3020 7.4600e- 39.5600 003 Page 11 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services

Category/Year

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

t MT/yr o n Mitigated 12.0247 0.7106 0.0000 29.7906

Unmitigated 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625

8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated

Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed

Land Use tons t MT/yr o n General Office 3.72 0.7551 0.0446 0.0000 1.8708 Building Hotel 233.23 47.3436 2.7979 0.0000 117.2917

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 48.0987 2.8426 0.0000 119.1625 Page 12 of 12 Inns at BVC Operation Emissions - San Diego County, Annual

Mitigated

Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed

Land Use tons t MT/yr o n General Office 0.93 0.1888 0.0112 0.0000 0.4677 Building Hotel 58.3075 11.8359 0.6995 0.0000 29.3229

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unenclosed 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking with Elevator Total 12.0247 0.7106 0.0000 29.7906

Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 9.0.0

Daily Emission Estimates for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Pounds) ROG (lbs/day) CO (lbs/day) NOx (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) SOx (lbs/day) CO2 (lbs/day) CH4 (lbs/day) N2O (lbs/day) CO2e (lbs/day) Grubbing/Land Clearing 2.03 11.74 22.96 4.01 1.01 3.00 1.52 0.90 0.62 0.03 3,074.32 0.75 0.12 3,129.85 Grading/Excavation 2.99 20.88 34.17 4.40 1.40 3.00 1.83 1.20 0.62 0.06 5,965.04 1.42 0.19 6,056.20 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 2.28 18.07 25.66 4.21 1.21 3.00 1.67 1.05 0.62 0.04 4,368.00 1.00 0.17 4,442.45 Paving 0.68 8.21 6.54 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.01 1,345.89 0.36 0.02 1,359.99 Maximum (pounds/day) 2.99 20.88 34.17 4.40 1.40 3.00 1.83 1.20 0.62 0.06 5,965.04 1.42 0.19 6,056.20 Total (tons/construction project) 0.18 1.33 2.03 0.28 0.09 0.20 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 346.81 0.08 0.01 352.28 Notes: Project Start Year -> 2021 Project Length (months) -> 7 Total Project Area (acres) -> 0 Maximum Area Disturbed/Day (acres) -> 0 Water Truck Used? -> Yes Total Material Imported/Exported Daily VMT (miles/day) Volume (yd3/day) Phase Soil Asphalt Soil Hauling Asphalt Hauling Worker Commute Water Truck Grubbing/Land Clearing 0 0 0 0 200 160 Grading/Excavation 0 0 0 0 1,120 200 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0 0 0 0 720 200 Paving 0 0 0 0 320 0 PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified. Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K. CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs.

Total Emission Estimates by Phase for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Tons for all except CO2e. Metric tonnes for CO2e) ROG (tons/phase) CO (tons/phase) NOx (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) SOx (tons/phase) CO2 (tons/phase) CH4 (tons/phase) N2O (tons/phase) CO2e (MT/phase) Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.02 0.09 0.18 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 23.67 0.01 0.00 21.86 Grading/Excavation 0.10 0.72 1.18 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 206.69 0.05 0.01 190.37 Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.05 0.42 0.59 0.10 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 100.90 0.02 0.00 93.10 Paving 0.01 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.55 0.00 0.00 14.25 Maximum (tons/phase) 0.10 0.72 1.18 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 206.69 0.05 0.01 190.37 Total (tons/construction project) 0.18 1.33 2.03 0.28 0.09 0.20 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 346.81 0.08 0.01 319.58 PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified. Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K. CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs. The CO2e emissions are reported as metric tons per phase.