DOCSLIB.ORG

"Implementing EPA's Clean Power Plan: a Menu of Options," NACAA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Acknowledgements On behalf of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA), we are pleased to provide Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options. Our association developed this document to help state and local air pollution control agencies identify technologies and policies to reduce greenhouse gases from the power sector. We hope that states and localities, as well as other stakeholders, find this document useful as states prepare their compliance strategies to achieve the carbon dioxide emissions targets set by the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. NACAA would like to thank The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) for its invaluable assistance in developing this document. We particularly thank Rich Sedano, Ken Colburn, John Shenot, Brenda Hausauer, and Camille Kadoch. In addition, we recognize the contribution of many others, including Riley Allen (RAP), Xavier Baldwin (Burbank Water and Power [retired]), Dave Farnsworth (RAP), Bruce Hedman (Institute for Industrial Productivity), Chris James (RAP), Jim Lazar (RAP), Carl Linvill (RAP), Alice Napoleon (Synapse), Rebecca Schultz (independent contractor), Anna Sommer (Sommer Energy), Jim Staudt (Andover Technology Partners), and Kenji Takahashi (Synapse). We would also like to thank those involved in the production of this document, including Patti Casey, Cathy Donohue, and Tim Newcomb (Newcomb Studios). We are grateful to Stu Clark (Washington) and Larry Greene (Sacramento, California), co-chairs of NACAA’s Global Warming Committee, under whose guidance this document was prepared. Finally, we appreciate the NACAA staff who oversaw this project, including S. William Becker, Executive Director, Karen Mongoven, Senior Staff Associate, and Phil Assmus, Senior Staff Associate. We also recognize the efforts of the NACAA 111(d) Steering Committee for this project, which included directors and staff from state and/or local air pollution control agencies in the following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin. George (Tad) Aburn Merlyn Hough NACAA Co-President NACAA Co-President Maryland Eugene, Oregon This document is available on the NACAA website at: www.4cleanair.org. ii Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................iii List of Tables ..............................................................vi Acronym List ..............................................................ix Executive Summary .......................................................ES-1 Introduction ...........................................................Intro-1 Chapter 1: Optimize Power Plant Operations ..................................1-1 Chapter 2: Implement Combined Heat and Power in the Electric Sector ............2-1 Chapter 3: Implement Combined Heat and Power in Other Sectors ................3-1 Chapter 4: Improve Coal Quality .............................................4-1 Chapter 5: Optimize Grid Operations .........................................5-1 Chapter 6: Increase Generation from Low-Emission Resources ....................6-1 Chapter 7: Pursue Carbon Capture and Utilization or Sequestration ...............7-1 Chapter 8: Retire Aging Power Plants .........................................8-1 Chapter 9: Switch Fuels at Existing Power Plants ...............................9-1 Chapter 10: Reduce Losses in the Transmission and Distribution System ...........10-1 Chapter 11: Establish Energy Savings Targets for Utilities ........................11-1 Chapter 12: Foster New Markets for Energy Efficiency ...........................12-1 Chapter 13: Pursue Behavioral Efficiency Programs .............................13-1 Chapter 14: Boost Appliance Efficiency Standards ..............................14-1 Chapter 15: Boost Building Energy Codes .....................................15-1 Chapter 16: Increase Clean Energy Procurement Requirements ....................16-1 Chapter 17: Encourage Clean Distributed Generation ...........................17-1 Chapter 18: Revise Transmission Pricing and Access Policies .....................18-1 Chapter 19: Revise Capacity Market Practices and Policies .......................19-1 Chapter 20: Improve Integration of Renewables into the Grid .....................20-1 Chapter 21: Change the Dispatch Order of Power Plants .........................21-1 Chapter 22: Improve Utility Resource Planning Practices ........................22-1 Chapter 23: Improve Demand Response Policies and Programs ...................23-1 Chapter 24: Adopt Market-Based Emissions Reduction Programs. 24-1 Chapter 25: Tax Carbon Dioxide Emissions ....................................25-1 Chapter 26: Consider Emerging Technologies and Other Important Policies .........26-1 iii Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options List of Figures Figure 1-1 Areas of a Coal-Fired Power Plant That Give Rise to Efficiency Loss . 1-1 Figure 1-2 Age and Capacity of Existing US Power Plants . 1-2 Figure 1-3 Cameo Generating Station, Grand Junction, Colorado, with Parabolic Solar Trough Installation . 1-7 Figure 2-1 Comparison of Separate and Combined Heat and Power Efficiencies and CO2 Emissions . 2-2 Figure 2-2 Existing US CHP Technology by Capacity and Site Number . 2-3 Figure 2-3 Heat Recovery From a Gas Combustion Turbine Using a Heat Recovery Steam Generator . 2-5 Figure 2-4 Annual CHP Capacity Additions . 2-6 Figure 2-5 Existing CHP Capacity by State (2012) . 2-10 Figure 2-6 CHP Can Be a Cost-Effective Source of New Generation Capacity . 2-17 Figure 3-1 Comparison of Separate and Combined Heat and Power Efficiencies and CO2 Emissions . 3-1 Figure 3-2 CHP Technical Potential and Existing Capacity by Sector . 3-4 Figure 3-3 Map of Existing US CHP Facilities Indicating Capacity and Sector . 3-5 Figure 3-4 Treatment of CHP in State Electricity Portfolio Standards . 3-10 Figure 3-5 Comparative Costs of CO2 Reduction Technologies . 3-17 Figure 4-1 Coal Characteristics by Coal Type . 4-7 Figure 5-1 Cost per Unit of Performance for Various Storage and System Flexibility Options . 5-5 Figure 5-2 Three-Phase and Single-Phase Electricity Distribution . 5-7 Figure 5-3 Major North American Electricity Interconnections . 5-8 Figure 6-1 Nuclear Power Plant Licensing and Construction Process . 6-7 Figure 6-2 Leading States for Investments in Renewable Energy . 6-11 Figure 6-3 Lifecycle GHG Emissions of Generating Technologies . 6-14 Figure 6-4 Avoided CO2 Emissions From Wind Energy in 2013 . 6-16 Figure 6-5 Water Use by Fuel and Cooling Technology . 6-17 Figure 6-6 Flexibility of Selected Generating Technologies . 6-18 Figure 6-7 Levelized Costs of Energy for Different Generating Technologies . 6-21 Figure 6-8 Comparison of Wind Power Prices to Wholesale Power Prices . 6-23 Figure 7-1 Pre-Combustion Capture at an IGCC Plant . 7-2 Figure 7-2 Oxy-Combustion Capture at a Pulverized Coal Plant . 7-2 Figure 7-3 Post-Combustion Capture at a Pulverized Coal Plant . 7-3 Figure 7-4 CO2 Phase Diagram . 7-4 Figure 7-5 Trapping Mechanisms Occur on Different Timeframes . 7-5 Figure 7-6 Eight Regions Used in USGS’s Geologic Storage Resource Assessment . 7-6 Figure 7-7 Geologic Storage Resource by Trapping Mechanism and Permeability Class . 7-6 Figure 7-8 Cross-Section of a Sample Storage Formation Showing the Distribution of Pore Volume Between Buoyant and Residual Trapping . 7-7 Figure 7-9 Phases of a Geologic Storage Project . 7-8 Figure 7-10 Many Coal-Fired Power Plants Overlie Potential Storage Formations . 7-12 Figure 7-11 Estimated Water Consumption at New Power Plants With and Without Carbon Capture . 7-15 Figure 7-12 Net Plant Efficiency (High Heating Value) With and Without Capture . 7-15 iv Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Figure 8-1 Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price, May 2008 to June 2014 ($ per MMBtu) . 8-11 Figure 8-2 US Coal Exports by State . 8-12 Figure 8-3 US Coal Exports . 8-12 Figure 8-4 Average Rail Transport Cost of Coal to the Power Sector by Major Coal Basin . 8-13 Figure 8-5 Annual Retail Electric Sales by Sector (2000–12) . 8-13 Figure 8-6 Lazard’s Estimates of Unsubsidized Levelized Cost of Energy (Dollars per Megawatt-Hour) . 8-14 Figure 8-7 Utility Incentives: Old Coal Plants Have Significant Investment in Rate Base . 8-16 Figure 9-1 Cofiring Configurations Among US Electric Generating Units (2012) . 9-5 Figure 9-2 CO2 Emissions Reductions at RGGI Sources From 2005 to 2009 . 9-5 Figure 9-3 US Fossil Fuel Prices (Real $/MMBTU) . 9-11 Figure 10-1 Simple Diagram of an Electric Transmission and Distribution System . 10-1 Figure 10-2 Average and Marginal Line Losses Increase With Load . 10-6 Figure 10-3 “Layer Cake” of Benefits Associated With Line Loss Reduction . 10-9 Figure 11-1 McKinsey GHG Abatement Curve . 11-2 Figure 11-2 Illustrative Example of Energy Savings Concept . 11-3 Figure 11-3 Common Energy Efficiency Program Types . 11-3 Figure 11-4 States That Have an EERS . 11-9 Figure 11-5 2011 and 2012 Electric Efficiency Savings and Targets by State . 11-9 Figure 11-6 Annual Spending on US Ratepayer-Funded Energy Efficiency Programs . 11-10 Figure 11-7 Projected Spending on Energy Efficiency Programs ($Billion,
Recommended publications
  • 2020 ETHANOL INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 1 Focusing Forward, from Challenge to Opportunity

    2020 ETHANOL INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 1 Focusing Forward, from Challenge to Opportunity

    RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION RFA Board of Directors Neil Koehler RFA Chairman Pacific Ethanol Inc. www.pacificethanol.com Jeanne McCaherty Charles Wilson Geoff Cooper Rick Schwarck RFA Vice Chair RFA Treasurer RFA President RFA Secretary Guardian Energy LLC Trenton Agri Products LLC Renewable Fuels Association Absolute Energy LLC www.guardiannrg.com www.trentonagriproducts.com www.EthanolRFA.org www.absenergy.org Neal Kemmet Mick Henderson Brian Kletscher Bob Pasma Ace Ethanol LLC Commonwealth Agri-Energy LLC Highwater Ethanol LLC Parallel Products www.aceethanol.com www.commonwealthagrienergy.com www.highwaterethanol.com www.parallelproducts.com Ray Baker Scott Mundt Pat Boyle Delayne Johnson Adkins Energy LLC Dakota Ethanol LLC Homeland Energy Solutions LLC Quad County Corn Processors Coop. www.adkinsenergy.com www.dakotaethanol.com www.homelandenergysolutions.com www.quad-county.com Eric McAfee John Didion Seth Harder Dana Lewis Aemetis Inc. Didion Ethanol LLC Husker Ag LLC Redfield Energy LLC www.aemetis.com www.didionmilling.com www.huskerag.com www.redfieldenergy.com Randall Doyal Carl Sitzmann Kevin Keiser Walter Wendland Al-Corn Clean Fuel LLC E Energy Adams LLC Ingredion Inc. Ringneck Energy LLC www.al-corn.com www.eenergyadams.com www.ingredion.com www.ringneckenergy.com Erik Huschitt Bill Pracht Chuck Woodside Brian Pasbrig Badger State Ethanol LLC East Kansas Agri-Energy LLC KAAPA Ethanol Holdings LLC Show Me Ethanol LLC www.badgerstateethanol.com www.ekaellc.com www.kaapaethanol.com www.smefuel.com Jim Leiting Jason Friedberg
  • The Clean Power Plan: an Enormous Economic Opportunity for Texas

    The Clean Power Plan: an Enormous Economic Opportunity for Texas

    The Clean Power Plan: An Enormous Economic Opportunity for Texas The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan establishes the nation’s first-ever limits on carbon pollution from existing power plants. The plan sets a carbon emissions reduction goal for each state in order to achieve a national power sector emissions reduction of 32 percent relative to 2005 levels by 2030. Texas’ target is to improve its power sector’s emissions intensity 33 percent relative to 2012 levels by 2030. Although Texas is the #1 carbon polluter in the country, that’s not the whole story. This is: Texas already produces more wind power than any other state. Texas ranks first in the nation for solar energy potential. Texas has greater potential to deploy energy efficiency than any other state. In fact, through current market trends alone, Texas will be 88% of the way toward meeting its 2030 Clean Power Plan target. Amplifying current trends Texas is already moving away from traditional coal generation and toward homegrown, cleaner energy sources, driven by deregulation of the electricity market, the development of the massive highway of transmission lines built to carry West Texas wind to cities throughout the state – the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ), and technological progress. Plus, this trend toward cleaner, more affordable power – which has coincided with a notable reduction in wholesale electricity prices – should continue. Environmental Defense Fund T 512 478 5161 New York, NY / Austin, TX / Bentonville, AR / Boston, MA / Boulder, CO / Raleigh, NC 301 Congress Ave, Suite 1300 F 512 478 8140 Sacramento, CA / San Francisco, CA / Washington, DC / Beijing, China / La Paz, Mexico Austin, TX 78701 edf.org Totally chlorine free 100% post-consumer recycled paper Benefits for Texans The Clean Power Plan will help Texas lead the world in the race to cleaner, more reliable power technologies, bringing significant benefits for Texas: Jobs Creation: Texas is the nation’s highest producer of natural gas.
  • Components of the Clean Power Plan: Setting State Goals to Cut

    Components of the Clean Power Plan: Setting State Goals to Cut

    COMPONENTS OF THE CLEAN POWER PLAN SETTING STATE GOALS TO CUT CARBON POLLUTION On August 3, President Obama and EPA announced the Clean Power Plan – a historic and important step in reducing carbon pollution from power plants that takes real action on climate change. Shaped by years of unprecedented outreach and public engagement, the final Clean Power Plan is fair, flexible and designed to strengthen the fast‐growing trend toward cleaner and lower‐polluting American energy. With strong but achievable standards for power plants, and customized goals for states to cut the carbon pollution that is driving climate change, the Clean Power Plan provides national consistency, accountability and a level playing field while reflecting each state’s energy mix. It also shows the world that the United States is committed to leading global efforts to address climate change. HOW THE CLEAN POWER PLAN WORKS The Clean Air Act – under section 111(d) – creates a partnership between EPA, states, tribes and U.S. territories – with EPA setting a goal and states and tribes choosing how they will meet it. The final Clean Power Plan follows that approach. EPA is establishing interim and final carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates for two subcategories of fossil fuel‐fired electric generating units (EGUs): o Fossil fuel‐fired electric generating units (generally, coal‐ fired power plants) o Natural gas‐fired combined cycle generating units To maximize the range of choices available to states in implementing the standards, and to utilities in meeting them, EPA is establishing interim and final statewide goals in three forms: o A rate‐based state goal measured in pounds per megawatt hour (lb/MWh); o A mass‐based state goal measured in total short tons of CO2; o A mass‐based goal with a new source complement measured in short tons of CO2.
  • Community Comments on EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed

    Community Comments on EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed

    Community Comments on EPA’s Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0545 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: State Guidelines for Greenhouse Submitted via regulations.gov Gas Emissions from Existing Electric February 26, 2018 Utility Generating Units The undersigned organizations oppose EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s ongoing campaign to repeal the Clean Power Plan and leave Americans without any meaningful nation-wide limits on carbon pollution from power plants. Repealing the Clean Power Plan and replacing it with weak limits on power plant carbon pollution—or nothing at all—is a reckless course of action that places the health and safety of millions of Americans at greater risk from climate change and higher levels of deadly air pollution. America’s power plants are our nation’s largest stationary source of the carbon pollution that is changing our climate and posing a dire threat to public health and welfare in the United States and worldwide. Communities and families across the country are already facing the devastating impacts of climate change in the form of more intense hurricanes, rising sea levels, heat waves, wildfires and other extreme weather events. We need to take urgent action to dramatically reduce the pollution that is destabilizing our climate, and it is essential to curb this pollution from the power sector. Deep emission reductions from the nation’s fossil fuel power plants are readily attainable, as shown by the clean energy and energy efficiency progress that is already underway and spurring innovation and job creation across the country. Despite the urgent need for action, Administrator Pruitt has proposed an outright repeal of the Clean Power Plan, one of America’s most important steps to address climate change and the only nation-wide limit on power plant carbon pollution.
  • THE RESCUE of ALSTOM Patrick Kron

    THE RESCUE of ALSTOM Patrick Kron

    http://www.ecole.org Seminar Business Life THE RESCUE OF ALSTOM Organised thanks to the patronage of the following companies : Air France Algoé2 by Alstom ANRT ArcelorMittal Patrick Kron Areva2 Cabinet Regimbeau1 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alstom Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations CEA Chaire “management de l’innovation” de l'École polytechnique December 7th, 2007 Chambre de Commerce et d'Industrie de Paris Report by Thomas Paris CNRS Translation by Rachel Marlin Conseil Supérieur de l'Ordre des Experts Comptables Danone Deloitte École des mines de Paris Overview EDF Entreprise & Personnel In 2003, Alstom was on the verge of bankruptcy. How could an ESCP-EAP Fondation Charles Léopold Mayer international, industrial company, more than a hundred years old, pour le Progrès de l'Homme have reached such a position in a rapidly expanding market ? What France Télécom FVA Management was the way out of this situation ? Alstom’s difficulties were the Roger Godino result of a combination of four factors : a technical problem, an Groupe ESSEC HRA Pharma inadequate operational performance, an impossible financial IDRH 1 situation, and the temporary collapse of its most important market. IdVectoR La Poste A rescue operation was hampered because these four factors had to Lafarge be handled simultaneously and the various bodies involved, Ministère de l’Industrie, direction générale des Entreprises including banks, shareholders, clients and employees had to be Paris-Ile de France Capitale Economique convinced that there was a future for Alstom, in spite of feelings of PSA Peugeot Citroën Reims Management School pessimism and general distrust. Acting as a catalyst, the French Renault state took on the challenge of making a successful last-ditch Saint-Gobain Schneider Electric Industrie attempt to turn the company around.
  • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Table of CONTENTS EDITOR’S COMMENTS

    2020 ANNUAL REPORT Table of CONTENTS EDITOR’S COMMENTS

    2020 ANNUAL REPORT table of CONTENTS EDITOR’S COMMENTS ...................................................................................................... 3 ENERGY SITES OF NORTH DAKOTA ................................................................................... 4 A VIEW FROM ABOVE ....................................................................................................... 4 NORTH DAKOTA GENERATION .......................................................................................... 5 GENERATION ................................................................................................................... 6 Mining ..................................................................................................................... 6 Reclamation ............................................................................................................. 7 Coal-Based ................................................................................................................. 8 Peaking Plants ............................................................................................................. 9 Wind .........................................................................................................................10 Hydroelectric ..............................................................................................................14 Geothermal ................................................................................................................15 Solar .........................................................................................................................16
  • The Ethanol Industry in Illinois

    The Ethanol Industry in Illinois

    The Ethanol Industry in Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability 703 Stratton Office Building Springfield, IL 62706 February 2008 53054_A_CGFA_Cover.indd 1 2/4/2008 10:48:13 AM Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability COMMISSION CO-CHAIRMEN Senator Jeffrey M. Schoenberg Representative Richard P. Myers SENATE HOUSE Bill Brady Patricia Bellock Don Harmon Frank Mautino Christine Radogno Robert Molaro David Syverson Elaine Nekritz Donne Trotter Raymond Poe EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dan R. Long DEPUTY DIRECTOR Trevor J. Clatfelter REVENUE MANAGER Jim Muschinske AUTHOR OF REPORT Benjamin L. Varner EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Donna K. Belknap TABLE OF CONTENTS A Report on the Ethanol Industry in Illinois – February 2008 PAGE Executive Summary i I. The History of Ethanol 1 II. Ethanol Manufacturing Process 11 III. State Government Support of Ethanol 14 IV. Ethanol Controversies 20 V. The Economic Effects of Ethanol 23 VI. Conclusion 27 TABLES: Illinois Ethanol Industry 7 E-85 Production in Illinois 15 Renewable Fuels Development Program Grants 16 Dry Mill Ethanol Profitability 23 Break Even Analysis of Ethanol 24 RFA Study Results 25 ISU Study Results 25 U of I Study Results 26 CHARTS: 2006 World Ethanol Production 4 U.S. Ethanol Production and Plants 5 U.S. Ethanol Biorefinery Locations 5 Ethanol Production Capacity by State 6 Petroleum Prices 10 Corn Prices 10 The Dry Milling Process 11 The Wet Milling Process 13 APPENDICES: Appendix A. U.S. Ethanol Plants 28 Appendix B. Illinois Ethanol Plant Permits 33 Appendix C. E-85 Fueling Stations in Illinois 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an overview of the ethanol industry in Illinois.
  • ALSTOM at a GLANCE 2020 at Alstom, We Partner with Our Stakeholders to Optimise Transport Networks by Understanding What Moves People

    ALSTOM at a GLANCE 2020 at Alstom, We Partner with Our Stakeholders to Optimise Transport Networks by Understanding What Moves People

    ALSTOM AT A GLANCE 2020 At Alstom, we partner with our stakeholders to optimise transport networks by understanding what moves people. We are proud to work together to reinvent mobility and make transport easier and more intuitive. Leading the way to sustainable and smart mobility – naturally Henri Poupart-Lafarge Alstom Chairman and CEO “The role of Alstom is not only to provide rolling stock, services and maintenance but to offer mobility solutions to a world in profound transformation. Alstom is in an excellent position to shape tomorrow’s mobility: efficient, sustainable and connected.” URBAN ROLLING STOCK CUSTOMISED MAINLINE ROLLING SERVICES STOCK A COMPLETE INTEGRATED URBAN SYSTEMS RANGE OF MOBILITY LOCOMOTIVES SOLUTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENTS SIGNALLING 03 Leading the way to greener and smarter mobility, worldwide We believe that mobility must be sustainable. Alstom’s teams view these challenges as an opportunity, and a duty, to help society move forward. We innovate to design transport systems that are the sustainable and durable backbone of a multimodal transport future. TAKE PART IN Submission deadline: THE INNOVATION 31 July 2020 AWARDS 2020 OUR STRATEGY SHARE YOUR CREATIVITY GROWTH INNOVATION EFFICIENCY by offering in smarter and powered by Alstom greater value greener mobility digital AiM in Motion to our customers solutions Driven by the One Alstom team, Agile, Inclusive and Responsible I NOVE YOU Inaugurated in 2008, this internal annual GREEN & SMART INNOVATION competition aims to reinforce Road electromobility the innovation culture and strategy in Alstom Group. Eco-design Green and traction GREEN MOBILITY manufacturing Multimodality SMART and Flow MOBILITY Autonomous management trains Data driven rail mobility 04 A localised organisation, a touch point wherever you are We are global and local, working with stakeholders at every level to support the development of the world’s most advanced transport networks and local communities.
  • Jonathan Overpeck Short Cv/Biographical Sketch

    Jonathan Overpeck Short Cv/Biographical Sketch

    JONATHAN OVERPECK SHORT CV/BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION 1979 AB in Geology (Honors), Hamilton College, New York 1981 MSc in Geological Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island 1985 PhD in Geological Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island 1985-86 Post-doctoral Research Scientist, Columbia University jointly with the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS (active in BOLD) 2017-present – Samuel A. Graham Dean, School for Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present – William B. Stapp Collegiate Professor of Environmental Education, School for Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present – Professor, Climate and Space Science and Engineering, Univ. of Michigan 2018-present – Professor, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Michigan 2017-present - Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 2016-2017 – Director, Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson 2016-2017 – Faculty Member, Institute for Energy Solutions, University of Arizona, Tucson 2014-2017 – Regents Professor, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 2014-2015 – Acting Initiative Co-leader, TRIF Water, Environmental and Energy Solutions Program, Univ. of Arizona 2009-2016 – Founding Co-Director, Institute of the Environment, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 2008-2017 – Faculty, Center for Latin American Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson 2007-2011 – Founding Director, Translational Environmental Research Program (now part of the larger TRIF Water, Environmental and Energy Solutions Program), Univ. of Arizona 2006-present – Affiliated Faculty Member – James E. Rogers College of Law, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 2004-2017 – Joint Professor, Dept. of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 1999-2008 – Director, Institute For the Study of Planet Earth, Univ.
  • The Impacts of EPA's Clean Power Plan on Electricity Generation And

    The Impacts of EPA's Clean Power Plan on Electricity Generation And

    The Impacts of EPA’s Clean Power Plan on Electricity Generation and Water Use in Texas Paul Faeth November 2014 Unlimited distribution Acknowledgements: Several people supported the effort to complete this analysis. Lars Hanson, in particular, provided significant help interpreting the Clean Power Plan, not only with review of the language, but most helpfully by reproducing EPA’s calculations for Texas so that we could ensure that the methods built into the model were correct. Erin Rebhan helped to develop the structure of the report and also handled the editing. I believe the report is more straightforward and easier to follow as a result of her help. The Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation provided the financial support to undertake the analysis, for which I am grateful. Author: Paul Faeth This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Photography Credit: xuanhuongha - Shutterstock, A.G.A - Shutterstock, pedrosala – Shutterstock, Juergen Faelchle - Shutterstock Approved by: November 2014 Don Cymrot, Vice President of Domestic Research Institute for Public Research Copyright © 2014 CNA Abstract The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new rule under the Clean Air Act—the Clean Power Plan (CPP)—to control carbon dioxide (CO ) emissions 2 from existing stationary electric power plants. In order to better understand the potential impacts of the rule for water consumption and withdrawals in Texas, a state that is experiencing on-going drought, we apply a power generation policy model to evaluate water use along with other economic and environmental indicators. We explore two scenarios: a Baseline scenario and the implementation of the CPP.
  • Energy & Environment Update

    Energy & Environment Update

    ML Strategies Update ML Strategies, LLC David Leiter, [email protected] 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Sarah Litke, [email protected] Washington, DC 20004 USA Neal Martin, [email protected] 202 434 7300 202 434 7400 fax FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: @MLStrategies www.mlstrategies.com AUGUST 31‚ 2015 Energy & Environment Update ENERGY AND CLIMATE DEBATE Congress returns from the August recess after the Labor Day holiday next week, and the in the meantime, energy and environment issues continue to play a significant role on the national and international stages through the rest of the year. Congress returns September 8 to a packed fall schedule that includes appropriations, the highway bill, reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank, the customs bill, the Iran nuclear deal, cybersecurity legislation, TSCA reform, tax extenders, the debt limit, criminal justice reform, energy legislation, a conference agreement on No Child Left Behind reform, and trade promotion authority. President Obama kicked off a busy fall climate schedule with the August 3 unveiling of the final Clean Power Plan. For recent Clean Power Plan developments, including the status of litigation, please see the Environmental Protection Agency section below. Since then, the president has traveled to Las Vegas, New Orleans, and Alaska to emphasize different aspects of his climate message, and the Obama Administration will continue in the same vein as the end of the year global climate negotiations in Paris near. As climate change increasingly becomes part of President Obama’s legacy, the president keynoted Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) eighth annual National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas August 24 and unveiled a series of new renewable energy efforts.
  • Commitment in Action

    Commitment in Action

    Commitment in action Plazza 2020-2021 Book Together, let's transform the Group Committed men, women and communities Plazza is at the heart of our commitment, and the communities selected for this issue are the perfect illustration of this. Each of them is working toward at least one of the aspects of the Engage 2025 strategy presented below. You can identify them by using the Group's colour codes. Gervais Pellissier Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Reinvent our profession as an operator People & Transformation Accelerate in high-growth regions I am writing to you in this new issue of The communities presented in this the Plazza Book amid unprecedented issue are relevant in more ways than disruptions. The health crisis has pushed one. Whether it be about networks, Place Data and AI at the heart of our innovation model us to accelerate our adaptations to the the sustainability of our customer new ways of working with a focus on relationships, our roots in growing regions Build the business of tomorrow together maintaining the Group's activities. It has or the development of our employees' been a catalyst for the new practices that skills, they reflect the four ambitions of each of you has had a chance to test out the Engage 2025 strategic plan and its Sustainably commit to inclusion and the planet in your everyday lives. sustainable commitment to society. Plazza has been in the heart of these The already-porous boundaries between changes, acting as a beacon, as a meeting the professional and personal spheres point, to support your many initiatives.